or perhaps you always come in late and your co-workers get annoyed with you.
does it matter when people get in as long as they do their work? or does a lack of punctuality just a symptom of chronics malingering and unprofessional attitude?
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)
The final question is very dependant on the nature of the work that you do.
― Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Emma, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― MarkH (MarkH), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― colette (a2lette), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
that's assuming you aren't doing work that requires your being available to other people at fixed times.
― DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:16 (twenty-two years ago)
Yeah, this is the case for me as well.
― Nicole (Nicole), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)
The next time I took a job, I told them that I would happily show up every morning at 10 AM sharp, as long as I could also switch off my lamp and walk away at 6 PM sharp. I didn't stay there very long.
― Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
We got told that core hours were 10-5 last week, which is fair enough as a lot of our time is spent in (unfortunately necessary) meetings, and if one slips a bit it can take days until everyone's free again.
The rubbish thing is the boss sending mails around saying "I don't like to name names but these rules apply to everyone". Name names, for fucks sake, or take people aside.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLUsky (coco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chris V. (Chris V), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 17:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Flexi-time is the way to go - work up a number of hours, whenever it suits. I would probably work January through to April without a break and take the rest of the year off.
― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 20:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Lara (Lara), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― hstencil, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― kevin, Thursday, 12 June 2003 00:27 (twenty-two years ago)