Every job I've had, every pub I've been in, most gigs and clubs I've been to it seems like the ratio has always been 10 men to 1 woman. Some exceptions may been working at the BBC (50/50 ratio) and my university (also around 50/50 in terms of staff, tho the student populous was probably 65/35 in favour of men)
Is this a big deal? I dunno, sometimes I just realise how much more time I spend in the company of men, whether by choice or not, and it strikes me as strange. Often this is to do with my interests but even ILE must be what - a 70/30 ratio at best?
Aren't there supposed to far more women in the world than men? Where'd they go? I'd really notice if I went somewhere and it was mostly just women - but I'm so used to it the other way round.
(this thread probably contains some sort of hidden message)
female posters feel free to 'reverse the polarity' Charmed style.
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:13 (twenty-two years ago)
I have no problem whatsoever with this.
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:18 (twenty-two years ago)
There was no overt hostility, but people who ended up in the "wrong" department for their gender left fairly quickly.
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)
Most of my pre-ILX friends were made through comic books, which is hugely male, so they are mostly men. And ILX still has far more men than women, as do London FAPs (Vicky in particular has pointed this out before). On AIM, counting the people I talk to most and feel closest to, it's much more evenly balanced, I think.
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:23 (twenty-two years ago)
No, it's not a big deal, quite the opposite. I often find it disturbing to be in an all-male environment, since I'm not good at "male talk" or "male behaviour".
(Yes, I'm a man myself. No, I'm not gay.)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)
I have no idea what this means, if anything.
(cross-post with Matt: try Friends/Buffy/Tori Amos discussion groups (or don't))
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― james (james), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)
several artistic/creative areas remain intrinsically male-dominated - specifically comics, video games, new media, electronic music. advertising, print design, film-making and the music industry seem a bit more balanced at least.
in all creative areas there is no logical reason why there should be a dominance of one gender so when it is apparent i think its down to social conditioning (e.g. comics and video games industries are stereotypically seen as the exclusive domain of nerdy guys)
i guess metropolitan bars and coffee shops are also more balanced, but when it comes to most pubs it still seems there's a stigma of 'this is a place for blokes to come get drunk talk about football' that prohibits a better balance.
the clientele at the club i'll be at tomorrow nigh will be around 80% male, perhaps because there's a certain 'trainspottery' aspect to the night. i don't think there's ever been a female trainspotter (literally) has there?
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
Possibly.
The student ration here is about 70:30 in favour of women, though I'm the boss in my office so they can't beat me down. Oh no. I have nae problem with this, nor should I.
― Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― jewelly (jewelly), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:38 (twenty-two years ago)
whew, god for something then.
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 11:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Always a handy approach for the deserving.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― liz (lizg), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― Spooner, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)
in my group of friends it's about even.
online music geeks is much more sad though... too bad.
― gygax! (gygax!), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― NA. (Nick A.), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― teeny (teeny), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 13:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)
as a schoolteacher in NYC: slightly outnumbered. it was cool to be the 'young guy teacher' and therefore be the one to talk to when someone had a problem; it sucked when we hired some younger dude because then I was automatically useless
working in publishing and the education industry: sort of outnumbered, and again glad of it
― Neudonym, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)
Actually, I think an office with too many women is worse. Women are horrible to each other.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)
Yeah, they can be. (Men can too, obviously, they just do it differently.) I spent a semester on an exchange program in Manchester, and rented a house with my girlfriend and four other students on the program -- all of whom happened to be female. Living in a house full of women was interesting. In general, as the only male (and as an attached male -- I was completely "safe") I got along with all of them. Multiple schisms developed between different individuals and sets of the women, but I was mostly spared the aggravation. (The only one I ever fought with, naturally, was my girlfriend.) My workplaces have always been fairly well mixed -- the greatest imbalance, typically, was at an alt-weekly, which was like 75 percent white guys. The office I work in right now is about evenly balanced between women and men, but in supervisory roles, women outnumber men 2:1. It's a very nice place to work.
― JesseFox (JesseFox), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― daria g (daria g), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)
*nods*
You should see some of the rows that slash writers (a genre that is 99% female) get into.
Aw, I was hoping this thread was going to be about *kinky* domination ;-)
Me too. :-)
― Christine 'Green Leafy Dragon' Indigo (cindigo), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 20:11 (twenty-two years ago)
I know 3 men.
― Mandee, Wednesday, 2 July 2003 21:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 22:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 2 July 2003 22:09 (twenty-two years ago)
when I was 15 I was at a summer program at columbia university which was about 100 girls to 15 boys. it was fun.
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 3 July 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― isadora (isadora), Thursday, 3 July 2003 02:37 (twenty-two years ago)
It's odd - in the leather community I tend to gravitate toward the all-female gatherings - I like that feeling of women being together and being intimate and sharing thoughts and play ideas and techniques ... so different when there is a male in the midst.
There really are different energies or auras or atmospheres depending on the gender composition of groups (and of the situations, too, of course) - and I don't think that one is better than the other, just different and fun and each has its place.
― I'm Passing Open Windows (Ms Laura), Thursday, 3 July 2003 02:47 (twenty-two years ago)
Every day I go to an art class. I think the lowest female-to-male ratio has been 5:1. In my photography classes, it runs close to 10:1.
This should really be a marketing tool for art departments everywhere.
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Thursday, 3 July 2003 02:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 July 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Thursday, 3 July 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Thursday, 3 July 2003 16:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 3 July 2003 17:13 (twenty-two years ago)
Well, Finland has for a long time been a strong supporter of gender equality (Finland was the second country in the world to grant the right to vote fo women). We have such mechanisms as a free municipal child-care for everyone, child benefit for everyone, a secured right to get your former job back after you return from your maternity leave etc. Because of these mechanisms and the general prevalent attitudes, the ratio between working men and working women is almost 50:50. Most women return to full-time work (part-time jobs are somewhat rare) after 1-2 years of maternity leave, and housewives are virtually an unknownw phenomena. Since the at least the eighties women have also had higher education ratings than men, and nowadays most colleges and universities are female-dominated.
Oh, and for a short time
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 July 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 4 July 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tuomas (Tuomas), Friday, 4 July 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pete (Pete), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 4 July 2003 11:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― caitlin (caitlin), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― kate (kate), Friday, 4 July 2003 13:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― lucy lurex (lucylurex), Saturday, 5 July 2003 00:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Saturday, 5 July 2003 01:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Saturday, 5 July 2003 01:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― stevem (blueski), Monday, 20 October 2003 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 20 October 2003 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)
It's possibly the office I've liked working in the most, simply due to attitude, etc. I don't know if these two things are connected.
― kate (kate), Monday, 20 October 2003 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)