― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― nnnh oh oh nnnh nnnh oh (James Blount), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:27 (twenty-two years ago)
That's a pretty strong statement.
― Ricardo (RickyT), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)
More intelligent? I tend to think of that as a fairly fixed thing, esp once you're an adult. More knowledgeable? Talk to people--ALL people, not just ones you think you can learn something from--and read books.
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― nnnh oh oh nnnh nnnh oh (James Blount), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:33 (twenty-two years ago)
- do new things (like Nick says)- think about those things- practise articulating what you think (talking, writing, whatever)- practise either defending what you think or modifying it based on other people's responses- repeat with next new thing
At its best, formal education is simply a case of getting people into the habit of doing this. Unfortunately formal education also tends to limit stage 2 by inferring or outright stating that some responses are right and some are wrong, rather than letting responses be 'peer-reviewed', which I reckon is the ideal.
(xpost) A lot of exams is about memory and recall and fluency, which are part of intelligence but not all. I never had to work very hard for exams because I have (had!) a good memory and could write quickly. But I wasn't more intelligent than someone who found the whole process a nightmare.
― Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan I., Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― james (james), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― james (james), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mikey G (Mikey G), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
a reliable indication of the absolute absence of intelligence is unqualified use of the phrase "dumbing down"
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 12:07 (twenty-two years ago)
Don't ever point out, in an obvious way, that you don't know something. Ask questions in a way that doesn't put the emphasis on what you don't know. (i.e. prefacing w/ "How does.." "How is it that.." rather than "I don't understand how.."). Seriously, I think projecting confidence, being decisive, and learning not to cut yrself down are key as far as being regarded as intelligent - meaning to have a practical sort of intelligence, not to be an absent-minded professor type. Absent-minded professor types are exasperating.
Other tactics such as listening & nodding like you understand, not running your mouth constantly, and having skills that many people in your field don't have can be useful.. As in, somebody who knows next to nothing about computers is really going to think you're smart if you get their PC back up and running by hitting control-alt-delete twice.
― daria g (daria g), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew L (Andrew L), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 19:54 (twenty-two years ago)
I'm not sure about daria's advice. I used to be afraid of admitting ignorance and invariably got tangled up in mortifying errors. Now if there's a gap in my knowledge I just say so. I'd rather get the facts from someone who does know (and usually people like to explain stuff as it makes them feel important) than stay a bluffer all my life. Noone can know everything, and one day I might be able to fill someone else's knowledge gap too.
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Cathy (Cathy), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:03 (twenty years ago)
- Look at situations with curiosity as often as you can.- Find failure as interesting as success.- Read widely and questioningly.- Think about what you say before you say it.- Identify your ignorance as clearly as you identify what you know.- Listen actively.
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:12 (twenty years ago)
― Bryan (Bryan), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:13 (twenty years ago)
― Aimless (Aimless), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:16 (twenty years ago)
—Ralph Waldo Emerson
― fields of salmon (fieldsofsalmon), Saturday, 11 March 2006 02:23 (twenty years ago)
― latebloomer (latebloomer), Saturday, 11 March 2006 03:04 (twenty years ago)
If you stop using your brain, do you go stupid?
― dog latin (dog latin), Saturday, 11 March 2006 03:47 (twenty years ago)