free-running / la parkour: Jump London

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
a programme, just on channel 4. 'Jump London'. three french guys. running. jumping. swinging. flipping. over everything. in cities.

the sebastien one talking v. philosophically about it. the discipline. the principles. I couldn't buy into it completely. I think I would have liked to.

but, my God, the heights+distances jumped.

brought to mind skateboarding [of course] and acrobatics and break and ballet dancing all at once.

the pet shop boys and will alsop were on, too. but just sitting/standing.

it was pretty amazing.

this is a sport, right?

have you heard of this/had experience of this before? did you see the programme? what?

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)

the art of le parkour - a BBC story about david belle and stuff. apparently the universally acknowledged guru and co-creator of le parkour, along w/ the sebastien foucan guy that was in this programme.

nike presto - a nike subsite for their presto range. funny they are associating themselves w/ this brand and range since I have two pairs of these trainers.

parkour proponents leap across london - guardian story about this programme. teaches me it is actually a repeat showing I have just seen. unless the time was changed.

parkour/yamakasi/street climbing/extreme walking/poochy pushah etc classic or dud? - a sebastien chikara [my sixth favourite ILXer] thread about this...sport.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Couldn't buy into it completely?

Not surprised. Lots of crap about how it helps us to rediscover/reclaim the stagnant city - cue soundbite of Will Hutton making an absolute prat of himself.

Bob Six (bobbysix), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:42 (twenty-two years ago)

My first reaction: this reminds me of a kind of super-heightened version of myself, jumping on rocks at the beach at a kid, something I could have imagined myself doing given ten times more courage and ten times less distractions. The essence of 'thinking like a child' in this way, this was how I thought as a child. Do all children feel this way?

My second reaction: the purest, most perfect art? The focus on aesthetics over simple achievement is interesting.

My third reaction: they do Nike adverts? Hmm...

Also: I hope lots of kids don't kill themselves trying to copy.

Not so interested in the 'reclaiming/re-focusing use of cityscape' idea either.

Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't like this site at all. makes it seem too much like skateboarding. which, as one of my opinions, is a bad thing. you can skateboard anywhere, perhaps, but you need a skateboard. there is no equipment required for this. there shouldn't be sites or online communities, I think. as a pursuit, it is, to me, primarily for the individual and their relationship to/interaction with 'obstacles'. maybe I am seeing this as more of a...spiritual thing, after all? maybe the only sort of spiritual thing that I could actually identify w/. I won't have a problem with that.

it is a v. human thing to do. everyone does it. mostly in childhood. it is just an exploration of self and space and then space and self.

[crosspost x2]

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Lots of crap about how it helps us to rediscover/reclaim the stagnant city - cue soundbite of Will Hutton making an absolute prat of himself.

I don't know about reclaim but I am w/ rediscover kind of utterly. re-examine. re-think. re-understand. if there is any basis for the last. or the rest.

I didn't see will hutton on the programme but, then again, I didn't see the pet shop boys immediately. you don't mean will alsop, do you?

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)

the focus on aesthetics that cook mentions--yes, this is swell, too, but, again, I am thinking more of an inward, rather than an outward, aesthetic. I am a selfish person.

cook's first reaction, also, yes. it reminds me of jumping on rocks, on lake michigan, just a couple of months ago. as well as on rocks, in the village I am from, many years ago.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)

Alsop discussing thoughts on 'alternative' ways for space to be utilised, buildings etc; this fails because architects design on the basis of: what am I being paid to create this space for? (Unless they are v. priviledged perhaps).

Gillanders is correct: this as much about inward as outward expression. It is discovering all that you are capable of, in a way.

Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

haha, cook's definition of architectural intent is v. sad and a little silly. but v. true in most cases.

there is, however, no failure on alsop's part, so much, since the spaces we are discussing here are public spaces. not operating theatres.

I think there always is/should be an indefiniteness to all public spaces of these kinds [these kinds of public spaces=the outside, essentially]. open and free spaces, in general, should be just that--almost universal places that, although made very definite in the way they are viewed or passed through or paused or stopped in or none of these in a routine way as part of people's actual routines, can be redefined in countless ways--simple: routes/paths/nonpaths taken and speeds and levels travelled at and all the other things that are the same things; depending on times and on other users and occupiers--complicated: combinations of all of these and all of the rest. I do sort of dislike the phrase 'redefinition' but not so much the concept. perhaps how useful it is is related, directly, to how [im]possible it is. I have tied myself in a knot.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Ha my statement above was supposed to be in the form of a question, i.e. I am note sure about this, please discuss/prove me wrong. But it had a question mark anyway which lost the point...

That made no sense, probably.

I suppose it is possible to say that every person redefines the space they occuppy at any time in an entirely different way. Hence this is simply an extreme form of such expression. Are we getting too deeply into this?

Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 23:05 (twenty-two years ago)

no, we need to redefine this discussion.

I didn't see the question mark. it was a good one. and the question, too.


yes, this is an extreme form. I definitely, now, do not think it should be seen a sport. not sport, not martial art. it is a recreation. recreating the person and the place.

yes, an extreme form of the simplest [x2] and most basic [x2] and purest [x2] recreational activity that everyone takes part in every day. I think to say, again and again, that we can learn from it [about ourselves and our places, yes, yes] is just underlining--this is how we learned in the beginning and things are always more obvious in the beginning. it is more obvious to those watching the beginners at the time and more obvious to the beginners thinking back when they no longer are.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)

most of the running, here, took place on/over rooftops. there are some beautiful rooftops but, for the most part, today, rooftops are just for accommodating vents and mechanisms and, occasionally, openings to afford light. this is what cook could mean with his architects-paid-to-create: they are not asked to make use of the roof but for the building itself or create access to it but for maintenance of its use to the building and, so, they can't. this programme had to negotiate the unusual accesses but these rooftops are still in the public space of the outside and most of the ones used are on public[ish] buildings.

it shouldn't be necessary to make an area the size of the building's footprint entirely offlimits--there should be care taken and generosity w/ these places. I might mean just in terms of public buildings but I don't think I do.


I think the blue nile might have had an idea of free-walking.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)

This was the guy who was in the BBC advert a while ago, yes? Wasn't some of that camera trickery?

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't remember seeing it but it is mentioned on the BBC page I liked to. david belle. he wasn't in the Jump London programme but his 'co-founder', sebastien foucan, was.

I'd have to think he wouldn't have been happy with there being any camera trickery or with people thinking there was.

there are a few videos on the nike site of running and jumping.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

That's nice to see.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

something I said to cook, as we were watching, was "they all seem to be acting and reacting the same ways." that is: they were running through and taking the same route, one after the other, but it didn't seem like following and certainly not following the precise movements and techniques of the one before because it was all too fast and gone for them to consider what has just been done by another and what they are doing and about to do themselves. so it seemed more like there was a very actual approach or discipline to the 'problems' of 'obstacles'. a set solution.

this is another way it is or should be unlike a sport: no competition. there are no 'tricks' as in skateboarding. there are better runners [in a number of ways [speed, elegance, etc.]] than others, I'm sure, and seeing these three good ones at once might have given the wrong impression but I wish it was as I imagine. concentrating on the inwardness, as I say, would re-inforce it as a study. rather than a sport.

at times their running seemed very like that of monkeys: their arms seemed longer and they were mostly low-to-the-ground. and w/ all the urbanity[uh-uh]/jungle cliches. ----------------------

memories of running like this are memories of thinking "I am barely in control because I don't know exactly what is coming after the next thing that I see but I am still balancing and moving forwards." it is like a very controlled fall.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:45 (twenty-two years ago)

i thought the actual final setpiece was astonishingly badly filmed, made everything seem pretty er, pedestrian after all the hype

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:02 (twenty-two years ago)

i think talk of inner satori and whatnot takes away a little from the elemental instinctiveness of the moment

it's not just like, athletic psychogeography

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:08 (twenty-two years ago)

The programme was a good idea but abysmally executed - could actually have done without all the talking heads and rehearsals & just shown them doing it; pure abstraction but with better filming. Maybe they should have got Patrick Keillor to direct.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)

my fave bit was when they were in france and amid the blah he came to a perfectly spaced out set of bollards and you just knew what YOU wanted to do

Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought it was poorly filmed too, the BBC ad was a whole lot better. And the philosophy stuff was a bit much for what seems like choreographed scarpering. The Saatchi plug was a bit much too. I was struck by how good London looked though - if you raise your eyes above the litter-ridden streets, it's really quite nice.

Alfie (Alfie), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

The programme was a bunch of ass. And shot and edited woefully (see the shot of the chap making the jump from the Belfast - you don't see the take off and landing in one complete take).

The first two minutes were OK I suppose but it was all downhill from then on in. Filler and padding for the most part, with some balderdash from the PSB thrown in for good measure. The programme’s claim that Street Running is "anarchic?" was laughable in the context presented, what with all the stunt co-ordinators, and corporate logos on show.

And does someone want to tell me what exactly was so impressive about *gasp* running across Foster's dodgy Millennium bridge? I think the best bit was the excited boss of Shakespeare’s Globe, his eyebrows bristling at the thought of some exciting, cewl and credible youth-orientated PR.

Alex K (Alex K), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

uh-huh, elemental instinctiveness is it.

I suppose I am not thinking of it as an awakening so much as a reawakening or, better, a reminder. a way of telling yourself 'I can cope and continue to' over and over.

I agree about the whole Jump London final run part. it started and it didn't seem like it was a conclusion. when it finished, either.

[crosspost x2]

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

http://www.ananova.com/images/web/65880.jpg

we were proposing what they might 'do' w/ the millennium bridge. we were surprised.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)

"The programme was a good idea but abysmally executed - could actually have done without all the talking heads and rehearsals & just shown them doing it; pure abstraction but with better filming. Maybe they should have got Patrick Keillor to direct."

absolutely, these were my thoughts whilst watching it last night. I was hoping for an 'elephant'-style sucession of moving images. The attempt (or at least the way it was approached) to provide some sort of narrative and backstory undermined the whole film, abetted by the terrible soundtrack and voiceover.

Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)

This programme promised so much in its first half hour that it failed to deliver in its final set piece (mainly because it was a set piece, and so dimly orchestrated around the social/architectural ostrananie factor, instead of the pure movement which, watching the kids in their home suburb, was a total joy). But wasn't one of its oddest aspects watching all these PR people for galleries, civic buildings, etc., clearly wondering whether the whole thing was a set-up, whether they were the dupes of some big C4 con to get bourgeois culture mavens to talk on air about how the latest thing the kids were up to was ... er, flying.

Keiller's next film project, by the way, is based on early 20th-C film of London, and is partly about how people treated the space (mostly unchanged since) differently: a lot more performance, he suspects.

Brian, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)

It made me think of Playtime and the games you can make of a city. It was a really interesting documentary: to have so much faith in your own body must be incredible.

...could actually have done without all the talking heads and rehearsals & just shown them doing it; pure abstraction but with better filming...

I'm not sure about this. Have you seen Winged Migration Marcello?

David. (Cozen), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks for that information Briain. Is anyone aware if Keiller's "Dilapidated Dwelling" has ever been aired on C4 (or elsewhere?)

Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)

"The Dilapidated Dwelling" seems to turn up now and again at festivals, but, as far as I know, having been made for C4, it was never aired (I may be wrong: I should know this having interviewed him about the new project for a forthcoming issue of frieze magazine). There's a related essay/ebook called "The Robinson Institute" at www.diffusion.org.uk, and he has an essay in Reaktion's big collection "London: from punk to Blair" (out Nov.). Also see Tate Britain's winter show on artists' films.... Sorry, didn't mean to derail into Keiller thread, but that programme last night seemed blissfully unaware that there was a history (maybe if Baudelaire had been a bit fitter...).

Brian, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Thanks for the link, Brian. Great idea, not sure about the pop-up assault though. I notice HSA is among the contributors...

Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i agree with a lot of what has been said here...
the final set piece was disappointing,i suppose inevitably
i mean,they were obviously going to take up the offer of a trip to london to do what they do anyway,but the fact that there had to be stunt co-ordinators,safety experts,permission granted,etc,takes away from what seems to be essentially a lot more to do with improvisation that any sort of pre-planned situation...

as for the whole philosophy underlying it,i suppose any attempt to frame something like that philosophically is bound to end up sounding a bit silly,and the matrix name drop didn't exactly diminish my cynicism,but i suppose the basic idea was that you may as well have a laugh in whatever way you can,and if you can reclaim/reinvent public space,all the better,which i completely agree with
the talking heads aspect was quite odd at times (pet shop boys and robert pires,randomly)but i quite liked seeing the (seemingly genuine)enthusiasm people had for the idea...
the quasi-matrix soundtrack was appalling
where the fuck does that style of half arsed electronic shite come from?
i can't think of anyone who makes it,there must just be one guy who gets commissioned by channell four all the time or something...

london did look great
i enjoyed it overall,and i like the idea(of the activity),its just a shame the whole thing wasn't better executed

robin (robin), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

three months pass...
To whom it may concern:
I am very interested in purchasing a copy of Jumping London, and was inquriring about where i could find it in DVD. E-mail me the informaation at the above address.
Thanks
Vie Vian

Vie Vian, Sunday, 21 December 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw this prog on C4 tonight (repeat i suppose) and I loved the idea, the fact that it doesn't require the equipment and so on.

the talking heads were annoying (all those PR ppl latching on to this 'radical' 'refreshing' thing) but this prog was showing something I hadn't seen so it had lots going for it. I'm not sure whether it could have been 'better filmed' as I don't know abt that stuff but the best bit was the 10 min sequence of these ppl doing jumps and running around all day.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)

How on earth have loads of people not killed themselves doing this?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)

they are 'professionals' matt.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw this last night & thought it was pretty amazing!

Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 22 December 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)

one month passes...
All you need to do is check out www.urbanfreeflow.com
Ive been doing parkour scince may 20th 03 and im still loving it. Its not easy but its not hard. Once you start you can stop ( litrally ! )

Check out the cambridge parkour site aswell http://jump.to/tct

Casper

Casper, Monday, 16 February 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Geez, why does every human being debate about something they know so little about! GAHH!! ...ok!

You have to understand this before you make any more conclusions about Jump London. Le Parkour is the "Art of Movement" and therefore it conceives WHY traceurs ("freerunners") do parkour. To some of us it's a way of life, there's no way I can explain it to anyone.. you just have to trust me... either that or experience it yourself (yeah that's it, go outside and try it before you talk about it please!).

The idea is to react with your surroundings in the way you feel fit. So, if one person sees a wall they may wall run it but another person might ignore it entirely or maybe wallflip it or something of the sort. It's all up to the individual.

Ok, the Jump London reactions I thought were rather annoying.. since I didn't see one person that actually has tried to understand parkour reply. I guarantee you if any one person were to walk outside and just do a bit of pk for maybe an hour just to have fun with it, they would NEVER stop. Why, because that feeling of freedom is almost impossible to find anywhere else, again, it's a feeling that no one can describe because it exists so little in todays world. SO, the show was to show everyone what parkour was about... and still everyone takes out their confusion on the editing!?! Oh and one more thing, YES Sebastien made that jump off the ship which was around.. oh.. 23 feet.

And finally.. Urbanfreeflow.com... I'm a part of this website and I will tell anyone and everyone I meet that this is the GREATEST place on the net. Why? UF has a well moderated forum and everyone is very cool on there. You can ask for help, share stories, or just have fun with other LIKE MINDED people. The UFKREW does nothing but promote the name of parkour in a good light (and train furiously to do so) and finally, they are an awesome bunch of guys that devote their lives to the art and to other traceurs. So... again, as we're all entitled to our opinions, there's mine.
Sov

SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)

since when do you have to know something about something before you can say something about it?

are you religious?

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

...not at all.

I didn't say you had to, I just said why do people do that?! It just makes you look a whole lot better and your reply doesn't seem extremely stupid to people who actually understand what the program was about. It's up to you though.

SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Global Frequency #6 to thread.

Vic Fluro, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)

you're the enlightened one.

yet, you didn't really explain anything about it and, in fact, most of what you did type had already been typed, in one way or another.

do you think it is more valuable to discuss something you have only just discovered and, perhaps, learn about it (even if from your wild misconceptions) or to just try to forget about it until someone who has the inside track lets you in on its secrets?

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Parkour is a sport, an art form and a way of life. There is no better way to describe it. I agree with Sov, go out and try it.

As for the actual show, yes Jump London wasn't put together very well, but personally I preferd most of the practice part to the actual 'Jump London' part of it. If you understand that Parkour is different things to different people, for me I don't care how high up I am... it doesn't take a large part of my philosophy, but other people love being high up. That is the beauty of Parkour, you can do as you please.

Gibsnag, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

"yet, you didn't really explain anything about it and, in fact, most of what you did type had already been typed, in one way or another."

Ermm.. I said like 3 times that it's impossible to explain. You have to try it yourself to understand where I'm coming from. I'm truly sorry if you are incapable of actually trying this artform, but if you can, get out there. This isn't an art kept to the teenagers, they just happen to be the people who actually don't mind having fun and not being smart.

SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

parkour is undiscussable.

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

www.urbanfreeflow.com
the only website y ou will ever need to do with parkour, friendly people and a great vibe

jonesie, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I have to agree with Sov, Parkour is near impossible to explain without one actually going out and trying it. You could sit here all day arguing and discussing about PK, but I doubt you'd get anywhere without actually doing it for real. goto www.urbanfreeflow.com and find some like minded people in your area and meet up for a jam, I find, that's the best way to really discover the essence of Parkour.

PK4LIFE! haha!

teen squeal, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Jesus, invasion of the prancing about evangelists.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)

is there a link to here on a freerunning website or something?

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I think if we could combine those things with parkour we'd be on to something!!

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Ice-breucking? I cannot do this without becoming the policeman in Allo Allo.

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there anyway to try this parkour thing without having to actually run? Because it sounds great but I'm kind of cack-handed and run like a girl so it would probably kill me. If not, someone might laugh at me.

Has Traceur Hand posted on this thread yet?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm totally open-minded about this, it looks like great fun if you're one of the minority physically adept enough to do it well. But I don't understand how "politics, economics, life's problems, they're all non existent, it's just you, the atmosphere, and your freedom" differs from playing golf or taking up the oboe or developing a smack habit or something.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha any fit young men (possibly wearing hoodies or other urban sportsgear) running around London from now on will be slapped with ASBOs quicker than you can say 'knife'.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)

What is an ASBO?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.crimereduction.gov.uk/asbos9.htm

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"But I don't understand how "politics, economics, life's problems, they're all non existent, it's just you, the atmosphere, and your freedom" differs from playing golf or taking up the oboe or developing a smack habit or something."

Well, I don't know about you, but when I go out and play golf when I'm having a bad day, I have a bad game. I find it as more of a way to help my spirits rather than get away from reality, and you're not exactly feeling free with 40 pounds of iron/steel on your back either. Like I said a few times before, it's damn near impossible to explain you really just have to do it yourself... that's just the feeling after a single jump... I haven't even gotten into a lifetime of this.

Matt - Technically you don't really need to run to start out. As you get better you actually go on what we call "runs" in which you do a series of moves that are all linked together. A lot of guys like myself also like to add flips into runs, so really it's very open. Do what you can, there aren't any limits.

RJG... sorry dude you keep confusing me.

SovXietday, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe this is my parkour.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

What about nude swimming, then?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

You have played golf = talk to the hand, girlfriend.

Thought the idea of someone doing this krazy jumping stuff wearing pringles and plus fours and that golfy sock pattern is making me chuckle; sort of Payne Stewart goes rad

Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Excuse me for being human... what the hell do you think we are!?

This is the type of thing that we hate, we're people just like you that have decided to venture forth and find our own physical and mental limits. Is that so crazy? Or is it just something that you wouldn't dare try because you like living in a confined state built by people that you admire. All I'd like to know is why exactly do you discriminate people like ourselves... All I'm asking is for everyone to give it a go... what's so wrong with that...


And the only thing I have to say about swimming nude is... it's not for me lol.

SovXietday, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

1: hey, this is pretty interesting
2: yeah, it kinda is and I think this
1: I think that, too, and also this
2: I'm not sure about that but I think this
1: yes, you are right
traceur: stop persecuting us!!
2: ????
1: fuck off

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Dis-regarding any mis-understanding and negative feeling in this thread...

Has anyone actually gone out and tried it yet?

teen squeal, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

I've not done parkour but I have freeclimbed buildings. Definitely a feeling of freedom. If I can get going on the parkour and combine the two things I'll totally be Spiderman and my parents' dream will be a reality.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"Parkour Stevens Can't Lose"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

petour parkour?

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait, it was Parkour Lewis, wasn't it? Oops.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Imagine this... there you are, 12 feet above the air falling toward the ground. Because of the adrenaline, it feels like you're not even moving, just floating there. A billion things are going through your mind at once, you're thinking about your technique and about how much FUN you're having. All you can hear is the wind going past your ears, everything else become a ballivion. Politics, Economics, Life's problems, they're all non existent, it's just you, the atmosphere, and your freedom.

I think it sounds fun. Mind you, I did a 134m bungee jump once and it was a bit of an anticlimax.

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

If I was 12 feet above the ir, I think my primary thoughts would be "I CAN'T BREATHE!", "OH GOD, BURNING UP ON RE-ENTRY!", and "EXPLOSIVE DECOMPRESSION STINGS!"

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)

you could've died.

cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)

How do I go and try it. Should I just get up right now and jump out of my window? Do I need special shoes?

N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.shoemaker.co.uk/shoe-custom.jpg

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)

No, just sensible sniper's shoes.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 19 February 2004 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)

SovXietday you are very touchy, aren't you? This hobby isn't helping you to relax and unwind very much... perhaps you should take up knitting instead.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 February 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

seven months pass...
walking along victoria embankment yesterday on the way to the new tate we saw a bunch of these people warming up under one of the bridges.

in my day we called it wogglehopping...

koogs (koogs), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm just off out to grease the edge of the roof.

Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

one year passes...
god, europeans are so gay

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 00:16 (nineteen years ago)

well done

RJG (RJG), Saturday, 3 June 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

it's definitely gay but it's fun to watch, i think, because it looks like how squirrels jump around in trees. most people are really not gay and not squirrel-like.

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 01:40 (nineteen years ago)

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=515642196227308929

gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 3 June 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)

i wish americans were that gay

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)

oh please. let squirrels be squirrels, monkeys be monkeys, and men be men.

i mean i guess it beats having arguing over the sudentenland or whatever but can't you all come up w/ constructive things to do??

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)

let's face it, all european sports are wack: badminton, cricket, lawn bowling, gymnastics, soccer, fencing, etc

renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 03:28 (nineteen years ago)

parkour sucks but vahid your posts are even lamer than the sport itself, so overrepeated and unfunny, and dont you listen to fucking gay dance music anyway? and what the fuck, while im at it basketball is just as graceful and pointless and gay as parkour - so the fuck what! and american football with the fucking tights and shoulder pads?? how old are you anyway?! youre infuriating me with this shit! that goes for all you american feeble internet dweebs with masculinity issues - im so sick of hearing this same 'homo' crap over and over again. get over yourselves and go hump a fat quarterback with a juicy ass

karri miback (cruisy), Saturday, 3 June 2006 06:18 (nineteen years ago)

karri miback otm

also badminton is fun, shut up

caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)

three years pass...

A+

stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:00 (sixteen years ago)

My 9-year-old son has started watching Parkour & Freerunning clips on youtube. Yesterday my wife had to give him an earful for vaulting over one of those shopping centre kiddie rides and scaring the wee toddler sitting in it. He told her he'd never be the best Freerunner in the world if she kept shouting at him for practising. Maybe in a few years he'll pop up here as a randomer and tell RJG to get out of his chair and just try it man.

stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:13 (sixteen years ago)

i've become the grumpy old man on the block because i keep flying out the door to shout at kids 'free' running through my garden.

Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)

xpost or he'd start writing awesome poetry on youtube about it (i can't believe i haven't posted this on ILX before)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrdSBvtYn2M

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)

You have!

cockles (country matters), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:26 (sixteen years ago)

there's apparently the freerun championship in london btw in trafalgar sq this evening (i thought that's why this thread got revived)

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

F-, "man up" and get a skateboard.

#/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

favo(u)rite of the big four do-it-on-yer-own sports

cockles (country matters), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)

xxxpost haha really??? i guess this is a sign that i really does too belong to this place, that's why afterall i've left marks you can still see my trace.

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)

oh yeah!

ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)

totally misjudged my audience?

#/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)

I only revived this thread as it was linked to from LJ's wank sports thread and it made me laugh I'd just had a parkour childcare incident.

totally misjudged my audience?

No worries kit, it can be your thing - like how Jerry Sadowitz calls his audience a bunch of cunts and they laugh and pretend to themselves he doesn't really mean it.

stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)

I have nothing but respect for the ILX community

#/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)

nine years pass...

pic.twitter.com/sqvfnSbWTu

— ... (@FLICTERIA) March 23, 2019

Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 5 April 2019 17:00 (six years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.