the sebastien one talking v. philosophically about it. the discipline. the principles. I couldn't buy into it completely. I think I would have liked to.
but, my God, the heights+distances jumped.
brought to mind skateboarding [of course] and acrobatics and break and ballet dancing all at once.
the pet shop boys and will alsop were on, too. but just sitting/standing.
it was pretty amazing.
this is a sport, right?
have you heard of this/had experience of this before? did you see the programme? what?
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:21 (twenty-two years ago)
nike presto - a nike subsite for their presto range. funny they are associating themselves w/ this brand and range since I have two pairs of these trainers.
parkour proponents leap across london - guardian story about this programme. teaches me it is actually a repeat showing I have just seen. unless the time was changed.
parkour/yamakasi/street climbing/extreme walking/poochy pushah etc classic or dud? - a sebastien chikara [my sixth favourite ILXer] thread about this...sport.
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)
Not surprised. Lots of crap about how it helps us to rediscover/reclaim the stagnant city - cue soundbite of Will Hutton making an absolute prat of himself.
― Bob Six (bobbysix), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:42 (twenty-two years ago)
My second reaction: the purest, most perfect art? The focus on aesthetics over simple achievement is interesting.
My third reaction: they do Nike adverts? Hmm...
Also: I hope lots of kids don't kill themselves trying to copy.
Not so interested in the 'reclaiming/re-focusing use of cityscape' idea either.
― Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:44 (twenty-two years ago)
it is a v. human thing to do. everyone does it. mostly in childhood. it is just an exploration of self and space and then space and self.
[crosspost x2]
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 21:53 (twenty-two years ago)
I don't know about reclaim but I am w/ rediscover kind of utterly. re-examine. re-think. re-understand. if there is any basis for the last. or the rest.
I didn't see will hutton on the programme but, then again, I didn't see the pet shop boys immediately. you don't mean will alsop, do you?
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)
cook's first reaction, also, yes. it reminds me of jumping on rocks, on lake michigan, just a couple of months ago. as well as on rocks, in the village I am from, many years ago.
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:07 (twenty-two years ago)
Gillanders is correct: this as much about inward as outward expression. It is discovering all that you are capable of, in a way.
― Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)
there is, however, no failure on alsop's part, so much, since the spaces we are discussing here are public spaces. not operating theatres.
I think there always is/should be an indefiniteness to all public spaces of these kinds [these kinds of public spaces=the outside, essentially]. open and free spaces, in general, should be just that--almost universal places that, although made very definite in the way they are viewed or passed through or paused or stopped in or none of these in a routine way as part of people's actual routines, can be redefined in countless ways--simple: routes/paths/nonpaths taken and speeds and levels travelled at and all the other things that are the same things; depending on times and on other users and occupiers--complicated: combinations of all of these and all of the rest. I do sort of dislike the phrase 'redefinition' but not so much the concept. perhaps how useful it is is related, directly, to how [im]possible it is. I have tied myself in a knot.
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 22:54 (twenty-two years ago)
That made no sense, probably.
I suppose it is possible to say that every person redefines the space they occuppy at any time in an entirely different way. Hence this is simply an extreme form of such expression. Are we getting too deeply into this?
― Ally C (Ally C), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 23:05 (twenty-two years ago)
I didn't see the question mark. it was a good one. and the question, too.
yes, this is an extreme form. I definitely, now, do not think it should be seen a sport. not sport, not martial art. it is a recreation. recreating the person and the place.
yes, an extreme form of the simplest [x2] and most basic [x2] and purest [x2] recreational activity that everyone takes part in every day. I think to say, again and again, that we can learn from it [about ourselves and our places, yes, yes] is just underlining--this is how we learned in the beginning and things are always more obvious in the beginning. it is more obvious to those watching the beginners at the time and more obvious to the beginners thinking back when they no longer are.
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 9 September 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)
it shouldn't be necessary to make an area the size of the building's footprint entirely offlimits--there should be care taken and generosity w/ these places. I might mean just in terms of public buildings but I don't think I do.
I think the blue nile might have had an idea of free-walking.
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)
I'd have to think he wouldn't have been happy with there being any camera trickery or with people thinking there was.
there are a few videos on the nike site of running and jumping.
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)
this is another way it is or should be unlike a sport: no competition. there are no 'tricks' as in skateboarding. there are better runners [in a number of ways [speed, elegance, etc.]] than others, I'm sure, and seeing these three good ones at once might have given the wrong impression but I wish it was as I imagine. concentrating on the inwardness, as I say, would re-inforce it as a study. rather than a sport.
at times their running seemed very like that of monkeys: their arms seemed longer and they were mostly low-to-the-ground. and w/ all the urbanity[uh-uh]/jungle cliches. ----------------------
memories of running like this are memories of thinking "I am barely in control because I don't know exactly what is coming after the next thing that I see but I am still balancing and moving forwards." it is like a very controlled fall.
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 08:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:02 (twenty-two years ago)
it's not just like, athletic psychogeography
― Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:09 (twenty-two years ago)
― Chip Morningstar (bob), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alfie (Alfie), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)
The first two minutes were OK I suppose but it was all downhill from then on in. Filler and padding for the most part, with some balderdash from the PSB thrown in for good measure. The programme’s claim that Street Running is "anarchic?" was laughable in the context presented, what with all the stunt co-ordinators, and corporate logos on show.
And does someone want to tell me what exactly was so impressive about *gasp* running across Foster's dodgy Millennium bridge? I think the best bit was the excited boss of Shakespeare’s Globe, his eyebrows bristling at the thought of some exciting, cewl and credible youth-orientated PR.
― Alex K (Alex K), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)
I suppose I am not thinking of it as an awakening so much as a reawakening or, better, a reminder. a way of telling yourself 'I can cope and continue to' over and over.
I agree about the whole Jump London final run part. it started and it didn't seem like it was a conclusion. when it finished, either.
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)
we were proposing what they might 'do' w/ the millennium bridge. we were surprised.
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
absolutely, these were my thoughts whilst watching it last night. I was hoping for an 'elephant'-style sucession of moving images. The attempt (or at least the way it was approached) to provide some sort of narrative and backstory undermined the whole film, abetted by the terrible soundtrack and voiceover.
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Keiller's next film project, by the way, is based on early 20th-C film of London, and is partly about how people treated the space (mostly unchanged since) differently: a lot more performance, he suspects.
― Brian, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)
...could actually have done without all the talking heads and rehearsals & just shown them doing it; pure abstraction but with better filming...
I'm not sure about this. Have you seen Winged Migration Marcello?
― David. (Cozen), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 11:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Brian, Wednesday, 10 September 2003 12:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nathan W (Nathan Webb), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 12:57 (twenty-two years ago)
as for the whole philosophy underlying it,i suppose any attempt to frame something like that philosophically is bound to end up sounding a bit silly,and the matrix name drop didn't exactly diminish my cynicism,but i suppose the basic idea was that you may as well have a laugh in whatever way you can,and if you can reclaim/reinvent public space,all the better,which i completely agree withthe talking heads aspect was quite odd at times (pet shop boys and robert pires,randomly)but i quite liked seeing the (seemingly genuine)enthusiasm people had for the idea...the quasi-matrix soundtrack was appallingwhere the fuck does that style of half arsed electronic shite come from?i can't think of anyone who makes it,there must just be one guy who gets commissioned by channell four all the time or something...
london did look greati enjoyed it overall,and i like the idea(of the activity),its just a shame the whole thing wasn't better executed
― robin (robin), Wednesday, 10 September 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)
― Vie Vian, Sunday, 21 December 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)
the talking heads were annoying (all those PR ppl latching on to this 'radical' 'refreshing' thing) but this prog was showing something I hadn't seen so it had lots going for it. I'm not sure whether it could have been 'better filmed' as I don't know abt that stuff but the best bit was the 10 min sequence of these ppl doing jumps and running around all day.
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 21 December 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Pinkpanther (Pinkpanther), Monday, 22 December 2003 12:36 (twenty-two years ago)
Check out the cambridge parkour site aswell http://jump.to/tct
Casper
― Casper, Monday, 16 February 2004 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)
You have to understand this before you make any more conclusions about Jump London. Le Parkour is the "Art of Movement" and therefore it conceives WHY traceurs ("freerunners") do parkour. To some of us it's a way of life, there's no way I can explain it to anyone.. you just have to trust me... either that or experience it yourself (yeah that's it, go outside and try it before you talk about it please!).
The idea is to react with your surroundings in the way you feel fit. So, if one person sees a wall they may wall run it but another person might ignore it entirely or maybe wallflip it or something of the sort. It's all up to the individual.
Ok, the Jump London reactions I thought were rather annoying.. since I didn't see one person that actually has tried to understand parkour reply. I guarantee you if any one person were to walk outside and just do a bit of pk for maybe an hour just to have fun with it, they would NEVER stop. Why, because that feeling of freedom is almost impossible to find anywhere else, again, it's a feeling that no one can describe because it exists so little in todays world. SO, the show was to show everyone what parkour was about... and still everyone takes out their confusion on the editing!?! Oh and one more thing, YES Sebastien made that jump off the ship which was around.. oh.. 23 feet.
And finally.. Urbanfreeflow.com... I'm a part of this website and I will tell anyone and everyone I meet that this is the GREATEST place on the net. Why? UF has a well moderated forum and everyone is very cool on there. You can ask for help, share stories, or just have fun with other LIKE MINDED people. The UFKREW does nothing but promote the name of parkour in a good light (and train furiously to do so) and finally, they are an awesome bunch of guys that devote their lives to the art and to other traceurs. So... again, as we're all entitled to our opinions, there's mine.Sov
― SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:28 (twenty-one years ago)
are you religious?
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)
I didn't say you had to, I just said why do people do that?! It just makes you look a whole lot better and your reply doesn't seem extremely stupid to people who actually understand what the program was about. It's up to you though.
― SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Vic Fluro, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:54 (twenty-one years ago)
yet, you didn't really explain anything about it and, in fact, most of what you did type had already been typed, in one way or another.
do you think it is more valuable to discuss something you have only just discovered and, perhaps, learn about it (even if from your wild misconceptions) or to just try to forget about it until someone who has the inside track lets you in on its secrets?
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)
As for the actual show, yes Jump London wasn't put together very well, but personally I preferd most of the practice part to the actual 'Jump London' part of it. If you understand that Parkour is different things to different people, for me I don't care how high up I am... it doesn't take a large part of my philosophy, but other people love being high up. That is the beauty of Parkour, you can do as you please.
― Gibsnag, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:59 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)
Ermm.. I said like 3 times that it's impossible to explain. You have to try it yourself to understand where I'm coming from. I'm truly sorry if you are incapable of actually trying this artform, but if you can, get out there. This isn't an art kept to the teenagers, they just happen to be the people who actually don't mind having fun and not being smart.
― SovXietday, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)
― jonesie, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 08:01 (twenty-one years ago)
PK4LIFE! haha!
― teen squeal, Tuesday, 17 February 2004 09:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 10:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)
Has Traceur Hand posted on this thread yet?
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)
― Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)
Well, I don't know about you, but when I go out and play golf when I'm having a bad day, I have a bad game. I find it as more of a way to help my spirits rather than get away from reality, and you're not exactly feeling free with 40 pounds of iron/steel on your back either. Like I said a few times before, it's damn near impossible to explain you really just have to do it yourself... that's just the feeling after a single jump... I haven't even gotten into a lifetime of this.
Matt - Technically you don't really need to run to start out. As you get better you actually go on what we call "runs" in which you do a series of moves that are all linked together. A lot of guys like myself also like to add flips into runs, so really it's very open. Do what you can, there aren't any limits.
RJG... sorry dude you keep confusing me.
― SovXietday, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)
Thought the idea of someone doing this krazy jumping stuff wearing pringles and plus fours and that golfy sock pattern is making me chuckle; sort of Payne Stewart goes rad
― Dave B (daveb), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
This is the type of thing that we hate, we're people just like you that have decided to venture forth and find our own physical and mental limits. Is that so crazy? Or is it just something that you wouldn't dare try because you like living in a confined state built by people that you admire. All I'd like to know is why exactly do you discriminate people like ourselves... All I'm asking is for everyone to give it a go... what's so wrong with that...
And the only thing I have to say about swimming nude is... it's not for me lol.
― SovXietday, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 17:41 (twenty-one years ago)
Has anyone actually gone out and tried it yet?
― teen squeal, Wednesday, 18 February 2004 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:07 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:40 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:43 (twenty-one years ago)
I think it sounds fun. Mind you, I did a 134m bungee jump once and it was a bit of an anticlimax.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:46 (twenty-one years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 18 February 2004 22:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 19 February 2004 00:45 (twenty-one years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 19 February 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)
in my day we called it wogglehopping...
― koogs (koogs), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)
― Markelby (Mark C), Monday, 4 October 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)
― renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 00:16 (nineteen years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Saturday, 3 June 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 01:40 (nineteen years ago)
― gabbneb (gabbneb), Saturday, 3 June 2006 01:55 (nineteen years ago)
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 02:16 (nineteen years ago)
i mean i guess it beats having arguing over the sudentenland or whatever but can't you all come up w/ constructive things to do??
― renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 03:22 (nineteen years ago)
― renegade bear shot by cops on frat row (vahid), Saturday, 3 June 2006 03:28 (nineteen years ago)
― karri miback (cruisy), Saturday, 3 June 2006 06:18 (nineteen years ago)
also badminton is fun, shut up
― caitlin oh no (caitxa1), Saturday, 3 June 2006 12:54 (nineteen years ago)
A+
― stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:00 (sixteen years ago)
My 9-year-old son has started watching Parkour & Freerunning clips on youtube. Yesterday my wife had to give him an earful for vaulting over one of those shopping centre kiddie rides and scaring the wee toddler sitting in it. He told her he'd never be the best Freerunner in the world if she kept shouting at him for practising. Maybe in a few years he'll pop up here as a randomer and tell RJG to get out of his chair and just try it man.
― stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:13 (sixteen years ago)
i've become the grumpy old man on the block because i keep flying out the door to shout at kids 'free' running through my garden.
― Great Scott! It's Molecular Man. (Ste), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:23 (sixteen years ago)
xpost or he'd start writing awesome poetry on youtube about it (i can't believe i haven't posted this on ILX before)https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QrdSBvtYn2M
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:25 (sixteen years ago)
You have!
― cockles (country matters), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:26 (sixteen years ago)
there's apparently the freerun championship in london btw in trafalgar sq this evening (i thought that's why this thread got revived)
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)
F-, "man up" and get a skateboard.
― #/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)
favo(u)rite of the big four do-it-on-yer-own sports
― cockles (country matters), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:27 (sixteen years ago)
xxxpost haha really??? i guess this is a sign that i really does too belong to this place, that's why afterall i've left marks you can still see my trace.
― ken "save-a-finn" c (ken c), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:30 (sixteen years ago)
oh yeah!
totally misjudged my audience?
― #/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:41 (sixteen years ago)
I only revived this thread as it was linked to from LJ's wank sports thread and it made me laugh I'd just had a parkour childcare incident.
― stop me if you think that you've heard this (onimo), Friday, 14 August 2009 13:52 (sixteen years ago)
I have nothing but respect for the ILX community
― #/.'#/'@ilikecats (g-kit), Friday, 14 August 2009 14:02 (sixteen years ago)
pic.twitter.com/sqvfnSbWTu— ... (@FLICTERIA) March 23, 2019
― Fuck the NRA (ulysses), Friday, 5 April 2019 17:00 (six years ago)