"any time i'm feeling good about myself or things, along comes a reminder of my physical presence."

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
mitch said that to me earlier.

and then, in an unrelated conversation, i said this to maura:

Dubplatestyle: i think we define too much of our lives around whether or not we are, and who we are or could be or are not, fucking. which is what all this worrying-about-appearance stuff whittles down to in the end, after the age of 14 anyway.

is this true? is it necessarily a bad thing, even if it is? does divorcing yourself from worrying about sex and your physical attractiveness to other humans allow you into some higher insight, like a monk or ray milland in "the man with the x-ray eyes"?

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:36 (twenty-two years ago)

We're designed to touch each other, hence all those nerve-endings in our skin and such. People who abstain and appear to be somehow 'enlightened' are just fucking high from not having enough tactile skin stimulation. Everyone deserves physical contact.

I am very much alone, lately, in that respect. So it's very high up in my thoughts.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:39 (twenty-two years ago)

A Greek monk who abstained from sex until he had apparently drained himself of all carnal urges remarked that it was like being "unchained from a madman". Take from that what you will.

adaml (adaml), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Being concerned with your physical form /= being concerned with sex or lack thereof necessarily.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I like mad people. tehy're interesting and fun at parties.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:44 (twenty-two years ago)

i think this thread has already been divided by the types of responses it will get.

also, nerve endings serve other distinct purposes. like letting you know fire is bad for you.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

well I think there's certainly degrees in the amount of worrying. Some small amount is probably okay, but being obsessed with your appearances and your perceived "unattractiveness" is not a good thing. It doesn't take being a monk to realize that.

hstencil, Monday, 27 October 2003 20:45 (twenty-two years ago)

That's liek saying all water is for is putting out fires though.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:46 (twenty-two years ago)

"other purposes" do not equal "all purposes"

a cool breeze on your skin or the feeling of warm water is not a sexual pleasure, by and large

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

>Being concerned with your physical form /= being concerned with sex or lack thereof necessarily

Nickalicious otm. I am fairly confident of my own sex appeal, but it can be a bit of a downer to be walking along all happy on a sunny day and then have a huge gang of children fall down laughing at you. (I am very very tall and this happens. Fucking Baltimore. Nobody got no class.)

Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think that I
will ever unchain myself
from that madman lust

I have tried and tried
and tried and tried and tried and
tried and tried. No dice.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:47 (twenty-two years ago)

That said, I'm not really worried about making myself shorter (xpost with myself).

Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:48 (twenty-two years ago)

what Tom said.
Some people think I look like Buddy Holly, or Elvis Costello. But I actually don't. Other than the fact that I have glasses and and a face and short hair.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm not suggesting that all physical pleasure is sexual, or all sexual pleasure physical, for that matter. Just that some sexual frustration is actually just physical frustration. Maybe.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:49 (twenty-two years ago)

and sometimes, when I think I want to have sex, I really just want to be accepted.

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

true, Horace.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

or hugged

Horace Mann (Horace Mann), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:53 (twenty-two years ago)

or pancakes.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

Aye. Or beer.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:54 (twenty-two years ago)

does divorcing yourself from worrying about sex and your physical attractiveness to other humans allow you into some higher insight, like a monk or ray milland in "the man with the x-ray eyes"?

I don't know about "higher insight" exactly, but I can understand how not devoting so much mental time/energy to these ends could open your thought-processes & awareness in previously-ignored areas of life. It's the same with anything one would worry/obsess over in that regard, though.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:55 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, but we ALL worry/obsess over it. whereas we don't for stamp collecting or beet root candy.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:58 (twenty-two years ago)

and sometimes, when I think I want to have sex, I really just want to be accepted.

At least you know the difference, Horace. Sometimes figuring that out can be hard.

I've never really worried about my physical presence/appearance, even when I found out it was pleasing to others. As long as I earned others' respect, THAT was important.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I want some beer.

NA (Nick A.), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

People have less sex than we imagine/fear/resent.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 20:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I meant things more along the lines of "what am I doing with my life?" or "wow I'm gonna DIE one day ugh" or other things that all humans worry/obsess about, as opposed to 'stamp collecting or beet root candy'.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:01 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, but we ALL worry/obsess over it.

yeah but not all to the same degree.

hstencil, Monday, 27 October 2003 21:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I worry that being single doesn't bother me enough.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:08 (twenty-two years ago)

256. sometimes i remember that i have something i want to talk about and i post it to ilx anyway

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

now that we've established that not everyone thinks about sex equally and enjoying nerve ending sensations doesn't necessarily give you a boner, can we attack some of the other ramifications of the above?

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think it's necessarily a bad thing. It depends if it drives from fantasy and absent-minded thought into unhealthy fixation and self-punishment, which is a difficult moment to define (especially for yourself).

How many people do you see every day who you'd like to sleep with?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh... I thought this was a weather thread. I just want to be a brain in a jar so I can comfortably live wherever's interesting. I guess I'd miss the old gonads though...

Ann Sterzinger (Ann Sterzinger), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Plus one staple of like all societies ever that I don't like is this notion SHOVED into our minds that sexuality & attractiveness are entirely a physical thing, as though self-confidence & personal-comfortability-with-oneself-as-a-sexual being aren't - in the immortal words of the GI Joe PSAs - "half the battle".

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

How often when you've had sex have you consciously thought, during or after, "yeah, that justifies all the time I spend thinking about it"?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Honestly.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

oh i really hate sex, by and large. that was one of the key points that drove the first post.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

What do you hate about it?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:16 (twenty-two years ago)

And do you enjoy masturbating? (Serious question.)

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)

attractiveness are entirely a physical thing, as though self-confidence & personal-comfortability-with-oneself-as-a-sexual being aren't - in the immortal words of the GI Joe PSAs - "half the battle".

Sure it is. You accept that now, but only because you are more mature to understand the value of self-worth. What young male thinks that far with his first brain, instead of his second?

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Hmmm, yeah I wish I was more bothered about being single. Personally, I'd say when I'm feeling positive and good about myself, it's not other people that bring me down, but the constant battle with myself and finding ways to avoid taking a step outside my comfort zone. That need to plan things to the Nth degree and be in total control of all situations. Oh dear.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

i will be much happier when i'm an old man and a darling nurse can lavish physical attention on me while i don't have to worry about the ramifications thereof.

x-post. i dislike the act. because i am a neurotic middle-class white male and it's been drummed into me that it's supposed to be something its not (whatever that something happens to be, for you.) which it never, ever is. the "good sex" i have is rare, mostly because i feel like it comes out of some realization of that something-it's-not. which is obviously fucked up, but is the conundrum i have learned to live with.

and yes, obviously, i do. but really that can come as no surprise.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:19 (twenty-two years ago)

TS: worrying about having/not having sex vs. worrying about the ramifications of sex (she/he's underage = go to jail, diseases, not knowing if it's your child or the [other] psycopath's, etc.)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:22 (twenty-two years ago)

dude, ethan already did the monk thread. And as others have said, even if you were a eunuch you could still worry about your looks. Not being able to have sex is more a symptom as is being "ugly," the real problem is low self-esteem.

bnw (bnw), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:23 (twenty-two years ago)

i want to esteem myself higher without the aid of books or effort

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:25 (twenty-two years ago)

i do love when people take the sentences with the little "?"s at the end as statements.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

I want to not watch the video for Snoop and Pharrell doing "Beautiful" again.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:29 (twenty-two years ago)

i notice how a. the ladies have not really touched this thread yet, and b. no one has yet to put forth a case for being as obsessed with sex/physical appearance as is normally thought to be "healthy" (or "unhealthy" but valorised by this here modern world and it's neurotic fuck-up artistes.)

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:34 (twenty-two years ago)

(big xpost)

i think there are limits to how enlightened anyone can be on this, a la our greek monk unchained...i don't even think that's a good option, celibacy seems like a permanent stalemate instead of a solution.

the 'evidence' supporting the evolutionary blah blah of beauty is pretty compelling (basically that It Matters, Cruelly), but beyond that i don't think science or conscience supports our current Maxim-ized culture, where sex is ever more present and public but the idea of participating in it for living people is more and more remote.

as far as 'what could i be thinking about if i wasn't thinking about (my) sex(ual self)' i really have no idea; my brain is pretty well entrenched in this area... tho to pick on monks some more i don't think history or current events give much credit to their approach.

g--ff c-nn-n (gcannon), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)

(afraid of disrupting male-bonding/sympathizing/empathizing type stuff)

teeny (teeny), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:40 (twenty-two years ago)

'what could i be thinking about if i wasn't thinking about (my) sex(ual self)'

Killing people. Generally. Crashing cars, exploding bombs, that kind of shit. And music. And football. Scoring goals. New shoes. All of which come back to facilitating me having more sex.

Which reminds me. Betjeman, on a hillside, in his wheelchair, being interviewed just before he died;

Interviewer; Sir John, do you regret anything?

Betjeman; Yes. I wish I'd had more sex.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 27 October 2003 21:43 (twenty-two years ago)

b. no one has yet to put forth a case for being as obsessed with sex/physical appearance as is normally thought to be "healthy" (or "unhealthy" but valorised by this here modern world and it's neurotic fuck-up artistes.)

well okay, I'm not sure what's "healthy" per se but I know for sure that the amount that you (meaning you, jess, not a general you) obsess over your supposedly horrid looks is super-unhealthy. How do I know? Well I've been there too, I can empathize. But after meeting you, I mean, jeez, you're not a bad looking dude at all! The idea that you'll "never have sex again" (woe is you!) is laughable. You remind me a lot of my friend Drew that way, who was so obsessed with how ugly he thought he was that it took him a long time to realize that girls really really liked him.

hstencil, Monday, 27 October 2003 21:45 (twenty-two years ago)

my real answer is quite simple...you don't need to be buff to be attractive. Mostly its the personality.

Chris V. (Chris V), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:01 (twenty-two years ago)

if i wasn't sick already, i'm sure i'd be vomiting right now

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:20 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, the implications are too horrible!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:23 (twenty-two years ago)

like andrew, i don't much care about on topicness either (as long as a good discussion results), but this thread is some sort of micro-epic of misreading. or maybe projection on the part of some of the paritcipants.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:25 (twenty-two years ago)

(note to self: "vile peopleevils are vile evils.")

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know if "Dan has a pity party and you're all invited!" necessarily makes for a good discussion.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:27 (twenty-two years ago)

it makes for a better discussion than miss mary's dating tips for young girls and boys!!

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:28 (twenty-two years ago)

I still don't understand how we've not been answering these questions...maybe a breakitbreakitbreakitdown is in order:

"i think we define too much of our lives around whether or not we are, and who we are or could be or are not, fucking. which is what all this worrying-about-appearance stuff whittles down to in the end, after the age of 14 anyway."

is this true?

This presupposes a collective "we", and thus I have to say "no". For you/someone else personally, the answer might be "yes".

is it necessarily a bad thing, even if it is?

Inasmuch as defining the quality of one's life by only one criteria, yes this is definitely a bad thing.

does divorcing yourself from worrying about sex and your physical attractiveness to other humans allow you into some higher insight, like a monk or ray milland in "the man with the x-ray eyes"?

Inasmuch as divorcing oneself from any unhealthy obsession can help shed insight on one's own life, yes.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:30 (twenty-two years ago)

but since i ain't never had no occasion to be speakin to the ones with the bits that go up inside'a them rather'n hang down low, i could surely use summathat to strike me up some conversation next time i'm down by the pig shack. i reckon i can pretend to be a sweet boy long enough to surpress the stranglin urge. that's why paw has me workin int he fields rather than the slaughterhouse witha the rest of the menfolk. i'm just too' 'gressive he says.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:31 (twenty-two years ago)

I did want to start a thread on smart people who don't like the traditional earmarks of intelligence and all of the attendant hypocrisies/contradictions therein but I couldn't figure out how to effectively phrase the kick-off question.

(Also, I think the link of personality to sex drive/sexual attraction isn't something that should be ignored in this discussion as the way someone behaves does affect how attractive they are to others.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:32 (twenty-two years ago)

nick, you were one of the people who actually managed to respond to the questions-as-asked in the first place, rather than go off on some tangent or attempt to play armchair psychoanalyst with me!! you're alright, man.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Right on!

(Sometimes I can't tell if I'm going off on some tangent or not - I blame all the psychedelics.)

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

so i'll punch you in the arm playfully, ala fred durst or some fraternity gentlemen. i only hug when young ladies are present. and then, only on occasion.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:34 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't think that disassociating yourself from sex allows you any insight whatsoever. All of the energy that was going into your sex drive and coloring your perspective from that angle is now going into some other aspect of your personality/physiology/neuroses and coloring your perspective from that angle. There's no such thing as a clear, unfettered perspective.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:36 (twenty-two years ago)

(Witness, for example, my mini-meltdown above about how people view my intelligence.)

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:37 (twenty-two years ago)

no, i agree. i just don't much see the value in trading one set of games for another, which seems to be what many people on this thread are suggesting. the end result is still a falsehood.

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:38 (twenty-two years ago)

From what I understand of Buddhism/Taoism/etc., "enlightenment" is really not far from "being a slacker" anyway.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't know if I'd go so far as to say it's still a falsehood. The conclusions you draw are probably extremely valid for the space your are currently inhabiting. I think the big problem most (if not all) people have is the whole consistency vs hypocrisy question; everyone's looking for a universal answer that makes their entire lives make sense without fully appreciating that the nature of external influences upon you matched with your innate interal chemical processes mean that you aren't the same person you were five minutes ago, let alone five years ago, and therefore looking for an overarching answer/solution to these types of questions is doomed to failure.

You can dispassionately look at relationships and dismiss them all as unfair power struggles right up until the day you meet someone who slots into your life, filling in all of the blanks you didn't know you had, at which point who cares about unfair power struggles?

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:44 (twenty-two years ago)

x-post earlier:

Dan if it helps you
I'll step up and underrate
your intelligence!

"Perry can't be smart,
nature handicapped his ass:
Cure fan? MUST be dumb"

Haikunym (Haikunym), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Normally I would say "There's no such thing as a dumb Cure fan!" but I've been to too many concerts.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:47 (twenty-two years ago)

btw: since i never bothered to explain this earlier, the opening quote struck me as applicable because blah blah if someone was truly happy inside without drawing their self-worth from the appreciation of others they would be comfortable with themselves and how they looked blah blah aint no love round here, it's just one big cycle here blah blah

mohammed abba (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:51 (twenty-two years ago)

if you convince yourself that you are intrinsically unlovable and that anyone who says otherwise is either lying to be kind or to be cruel or because they are conventional simpletons are trapped inside some kind of pitiful clichescape, then naturally you are going start behaving in hostile ways towards people who i. probably would like you if you weren't acting the way you were towards them, or ii. actually do like you

then people react against you, and you can cite the iron rules of physical-sexual attraction as having been against you from the start - "why should i bother being interested in people, i'm ugly what's the point etc etc"

obsessing that it's yr physical presence which is playing the main role in everything = deciding not to bother doing anything about the stuff which is ACTUALLY playing the main role viz yr behaviour towards people

the thing that gives you "higher" insight into other people and what they want and who they are is being interested in them and asking and finding out, or at least observing: if you let your worries abt yr fuckability stop you bothering being interested in other people then yes, i think this greatly hampers yr insight

everyone behaves like a dick sometimes: this is not their "true essence", it's behaving like a dick sometimes

i think thinking abt yr worth to others is no bad thing, but a. don't assume it just boils down to fuckability cz it totally doesn't, b. you're probably overlooking all kinds of stuff abt yourself that comes easy to you and you therefore take for granted, the stuff THEY value which you DON'T (and they're probably RIGHT and you're probably WRONG)

it's silly to pretend that ppl aren't sexual, but it's just as silly to convince yrself that the sexual lens is the only undeluded lens - don't trust undeludedness!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 19:59 (twenty-two years ago)

best advice ever!

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:37 (twenty-two years ago)

As usual, Sinker is dead on.

think thinking abt yr worth to others is no bad thing, but a. don't assume it just boils down to fuckability cz it totally doesn't, b. you're probably overlooking all kinds of stuff abt yourself that comes easy to you and you therefore take for granted, the stuff THEY value which you DON'T (and they're probably RIGHT and you're probably WRONG)

Right vs. wrong is such a subjective term, you could spend centuries in arguments discussing it. Thankfully, fuckability doesn't truly matter in the larger scheme of things. It should matter more about what you can contribute to the world, in the relatively short amount of time you've got.

Jess, I too have become guilty of disappearing on tangents. Sorry, sir.

Nichole Graham (Nichole Graham), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:41 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, as if jess has never disappeared on a tangent himself

geeta (geeta), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:42 (twenty-two years ago)

Tangents rule. Much better than coworkers.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:50 (twenty-two years ago)

ts: sines vs cosines

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 20:52 (twenty-two years ago)

ts: zen Vs. cozen.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 29 October 2003 21:09 (twenty-two years ago)

i think we define too much of our lives around whether or not we are, and who we are or could be or are not, fucking.

"Are" does not equal "could be." The POTENTIAL fucking thing is way more central to the your-life-revolves-around-it ego thing than whatever KINETIC fucking is actually going on. Way more. Way way way way more. And ta-da, potential fucking is all in your mind! Have a fucking ball! I know I do.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 30 October 2003 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)

Dude, this thread has just shown me how we're all walking brains with major neuroses and personal issues we should all be working on. OMG.

Jess, I don't give one crap if you hate me or not, because I'm going to be doing some spilling on a thread of yours and I won't be held back, plus it's something that is partially in response to another thread so yay for irritations galore.

I spent the first eighteen years of my life not letting people get to know the inner me. I was all about surface and pretty pictures and small talk. All this left me was a nervous breakdown and friendships built on shaky ground. Now I realize that people are going to pick on me no matter what I do. I'd rather have a few deep friendships and a sense that those few people know who I am inside.

As for the original topic -- yes, I can and do relate completely to looking in the mirror and hating what one sees. I've never been happy with my phsyical appearance. In fact, whenever I experience those moments in which I feel good about myself, it's because I'm secure about my inner self. I still will look at my reflection in the mirror and think how horrendous I look. And no, it doesn't have anything to do with wanting "more sex" in my life -- though "any sex" would automatically = "more sex" in my case -- because I have pretty much given up on experiencing that part of life. No, I think it's rather a case of someone of the opposite gender taking a look at me and *gasp* actually being interested. And all the advice and "wise words to ponder" aren't going to do jack unless I seek professional advice in re: this issue, because this is all part of something that is so much bigger than you or me.

And maybe that's what you need.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Thursday, 30 October 2003 03:36 (twenty-two years ago)

dunno how true it is but i usually feel pretty good about how i look, bodywise, or at least comfortable. my hair can get messy which i fret about and generally about looking like total hell after a bad night's sleep, which i really do.

but what i always worry about is that i'm too intellectualetc. to just cut loose and have a good time. or rather, that i do have a good time in intense discussions about x,y,z but that it makes it hard for others who i would like to relate to to relate back to me. like the idea of small-talk is completely alien to me, tho i do a great job at it when i feel i'm doing it for a purpose. but to just... do it... as a nice thing to do... i always feel horrible and tawdry and manipulative. okay. not really. but sometimes. its like if i don't get a certain engagement out of a conversation i drift off.

sometimes i feel jerky because of that too, the drifting off thing.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 30 October 2003 03:39 (twenty-two years ago)

The POTENTIAL fucking thing is way more central to the your-life-revolves-around-it ego thing than whatever KINETIC fucking is actually going on. Way more. Way way way way more. And ta-da, potential fucking is all in your mind! Have a fucking ball! I know I do.

For the purpose of the argument I am going to take Tracer's post here at face value -- apologies if it is more tongue in cheek. Maybe there is fundamental male-female divide here -- forgive the generalization. I think many woman have the feeling that they could "fuck" just about anyone -- so it's not something that they would necessarily fantasize over. Gareth (I mean Charlton) alludes that having someone finding you attractive makes you feel better about yourself. While this is true, it can also get in the way. There could be someone who you just want to be friends with, but they are ruining things by doing silly things to show you that they find you -- I don't known -- "fuckable"?

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I no wot you meen Sterling. Sumtimes I wurry that I are too interlekctual too.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:47 (twenty-two years ago)

i want love not sex

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:56 (twenty-two years ago)

i mean i want sex too but it is a subset of something larger in my mind.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)

although it depends who with, but i'm not looking who i want to fuck in a room full of people, i'm looking for something more than that. ideally, ya know?

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 October 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)

gareth puts things wonderfully way upthread (i.e. throw me in the gareth-tracer "it's all in the potential" camp), so yeah, mary, xx and xy def. come at this from different angles (i.e. "complications" in many cases = the interesting bits for men).

lauren is way too fucking hard on herself. stop that.

and lemme say that the worst situation to generate the types of thoughts jess mentions to start is within an actual relationship. a relationship that turns essentially platonic and it certainly makes you question yr own self-worth as a sexual object, an attractive person (and not just in the physical sense) and really yr whole sense of self overall. i've had this happen before (as i'm sure most everyone has), and really the only way to get yr head around it is to convince yrself that you don't care at all about sex or human contact or any of that shit, which takes some practice but is absolutely possible!

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 30 October 2003 05:12 (twenty-two years ago)

possible but still not great for your head (welcome to where i am now)

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 30 October 2003 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)

and lemme say that the worst situation to generate the types of thoughts jess mentions to start is within an actual relationship. a relationship that turns essentially platonic and it certainly makes you question yr own self-worth as a sexual object, an attractive person (and not just in the physical sense) and really yr whole sense of self overall.

Y3 OTM. (I love the way this thread is turning into a love fest.)

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 30 October 2003 05:36 (twenty-two years ago)

the only polite thing to do when you break up with somebody is to tell them you still find them indescribeably hottt but are breaking up for other reasons.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 30 October 2003 05:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Also: I'm really surprised at how many men here are admitting to deriving a large part of their self-worth from whether some random people think they are attractive or not. I thought this was more a female province -- leading them to competition for attention. I have always considered myself lucky that I haven't been heavily socialized in this manner -- though when I was younger I found it common to some of my girl friends.

Mary (Mary), Thursday, 30 October 2003 05:50 (twenty-two years ago)

i am emo

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 30 October 2003 06:14 (twenty-two years ago)

a relationship that turns essentially platonic and it certainly makes you question yr own self-worth

Speaking from 10 intensive years on the subject, I think you have this backwards. Or at the least, it's a self-fullfilling prophecy.

bnw (bnw), Thursday, 30 October 2003 07:13 (twenty-two years ago)

the reverse may be possible, but i do think Yanc3y is right.

the surface noise (electricsound), Thursday, 30 October 2003 08:59 (twenty-two years ago)

similarly i feel ok abt how i look. But problems do come along bczI'm not a great conversationalist and talking about records is the only thing I might be good at.

Its the whole thing of trying to build rapport with someone that is a problem and the more I want it to happen then the more difficult it would prob be.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 30 October 2003 09:25 (twenty-two years ago)

always good to see you at the FAPS Julio

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 30 October 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, I know how you feel about the conversation thing Julio. I'd say I'm sorta the same.

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 30 October 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

There could be someone who you just want to be friends with, but they are ruining things by doing silly things to show you that they find you -- I don't known -- "fuckable"?

i sometimes worry that i am the sort of person of whom mary complains, albeit in a slightly less shrill register.

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 30 October 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

yknow, actually, i am feeling fine abt my looks lately. this probably means that i'm teetering on the brink of an abyss of self-loathing but that'll do for now.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Thursday, 30 October 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I wish my face didn't dislike shaving so much. I'm either stubbly or spotty.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 30 October 2003 23:40 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.