http://www.chavscum.co.uk/

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
excellent.

splooge (thesplooge), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

old

Porkpie (porkpie), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Occassionally amusing, but a tad obvious and unforgivably snobby.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:14 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not clicking on that until i know the URL is supposed to be "chav scum".

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway http://wwww.scallycentral.com

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's pretty bloody obnoxious, actually. As a generality, I hate charvers, but I suspect that to many of the people there, "chav" = "working class person".

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

it's the only thing my classmates at journo school ever studied.

actually it's made me paranoid. every time I put on a pair of trousers or t-shirt in pastels I ask, "Do I look chav in this?"

Catty (Catty), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:19 (twenty-one years ago)

are they nike tracksuit trousers?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

i thought a chav was just like saying pleb or whatever a decade back.

splooge (thesplooge), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Up here, "charver" is a specific behaviour + dress thing - people who act like this, dress like this and talk like this = "charver". they are not regarded w/much affection, least of all by those who live amongst them.

http://www.newcastlestuff.com/charver/

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:27 (twenty-one years ago)

is it necessary to have working-class/underclass credentials before disapproving of chavs/neds/schemies/etc in order to be immune from accusations of 'snobbery' ?

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:32 (twenty-one years ago)

ha ha Pash, the shoes in that piece on the link for lifestyles, are my shoes.

I like to rock the chav look once in a while, trakkie bottoms excepted

Porkpie (porkpie), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd never heard the word chav or charver before this site. We just say "scallies". Where I grew up the local public schoolkids referred to all of us at the comprehensive as "townies", so that word has long irritated me.

Mind you, this is fucking terrifying.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

we called them "ravers" at our school, even though they weren't ravers.

what is the difference between:

chavs
neds
townies
scallies

? Hmmmm?

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:04 (twenty-one years ago)

scallies=quite north-west
neds=glasgow
chavs=SE
townies=universal but esp in university towns.

ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, if it they just said 'cunitish behaviour - bunch of scumbags' but the general tone is 'look at the clothes they like and the poverty of their aspirations!'. Unlike us, natch, who set up websites that advance humanity ever forward etc. Bunch of barleys innit.

Dave B (daveb), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't agree. i've known some quite posh "chavs" in my time, even though that's the first time i've ever used the word.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)

In my case it was more like 'look at the fist that is directed towards my face and the enormous sovereign rings that are on each finger' Dave.

xpost yes Charlie, I was at a grammar school and most of the middle-class girlies still had big old pineapple hairdos and clown jewellery.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:14 (twenty-one years ago)

in Ireland a townie is anyone who lives in a town outside Dublin. Mad, eh?

DV (dirtyvicar), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

also

charvers = north-east

my grandfather used to say this, so i think perhaps "chav" is a corruption (it's probably old norse for ne'erdowell" or summat, like).

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)

In late eighties Manchester, the loved-up scally was king.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:17 (twenty-one years ago)

that sounds like the first line of the next paul morley book...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

I was hoping so.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The chav/ned/townie/scally is definitely down to a look and attitude more than how rich they are. I believe the offensive term when one is referring to the underclasses is "pikey".

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I've heard "townie" used too often by students and public schoolies to refer to anyone who isn't them to find it anything other than odious.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

'Pikey' is what chavs call travelling folk innit.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Both of these are interesting:

http://www.northumbrianassociation.co.uk/viewarticle.php?p_article_id=71

http://www.worldwidewords.org/topicalwords/tw-cha2.htm

The second suggests "charver" is Romany for prostitute. And also has this insight into regional variations:

From a linguistic perspective the most interesting aspect is the wide variety of local names given to the type. Scots call them neds (often said to be an acronym of “non-educated delinquents”, but that’s a folk etymology, given credence by being mentioned as fact during a debate in the Scottish parliament in 2003; it’s actually from an abridged form of the given name Edward, which was attached to this group in the period of the teddy-boys, who dressed in a version of Edwardian costume), while Liverpudlians prefer scallies (a term of long-standing for a boisterous, disruptive or irresponsible young man); Kev is common around London (presumably from the given name Kevin, common among this group and popularised through the portrayal on his television show by the comedian Harry Enfield of an idiotic teenager with that name). Other terms recorded from various parts of the country are janners (from Plymouth), smicks, spides, moakes and steeks (all from Belfast), plus bazzas, scuffheads, stigs, stangers, yarcos, and kappa slappers (girls who wear Kappa brand tracksuits, slapper being British slang for a promiscuous or vulgar woman).

Bazza?!

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Dazzas and Shelleys.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, they called them Barrys and Bazzas in Cambridge - I'd forgotten about that one.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:28 (twenty-one years ago)

More Chatham references! My day is complete.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I've heard "steeks" as well in Northern Ireland.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I like "Shelleys" that's classic!

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Why has there never been a King Barry?

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Shelleys is a good one. It's actually said with love.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

"Why has there never been a King Barry?"

(Can please someone photoshop Baz Lazazz's head onto a portrait of Henry VIII here? kthxbye)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:34 (twenty-one years ago)

ah, i see - but perhaps mockery is more easily/appropriately directed towards them in terms of their look/sound/'aesthetic' than trying to take the piss out of their behaviour tendencies - derision needs a relatively harmless but visible/audible hook to hang on

the fact that there may well be a kind of self-conscious defiant adoption of the 'uniform' by some of them makes it a matter of confirmation, further dismissal, maybe funnier - and it makes it useful for all these stereotypes/cliches have a degree of accuracy - up here, being able to spot the white sportsgear and hear the high-pitched whiney nostril-talk is very useful in being able to take evasive action, or get ready for the bother

and 'neds' used to be just Glasgow - Dundee/Edinburgh used 'schemies' (i.e. yoots from 'housing schemes' => 'sink estates' in later parlance) for years - don't know if Aberdeen had it's own term.
'ned' has taken over in all of scotland due to political/meejah interest, i think.

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

'Kev' didn't come from Harry Enfield's character, at least where I grew up it was widely used in the mid-80s when I was at primary school!

We used to say 'Garys' as well but I think that was more for Kevs who dressed "smart" and thought they were slick.

poopy, Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:38 (twenty-one years ago)

"raver" must have been peculiar to north herts I think. Maybe it was even originated by my friendship group because it referred to anyone who didn't like rock music and then got more specified or something... Anyway, I know people in several different schools who used to use this term.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah yes, Garys and Kevs. You didn't go to a well-known public school in SW London, did you poopy?

Markelby (Mark C), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Let's see: I've heard schemies (all of Scotland that looks to Edinburgh/East uses this), neds, scallies, townies, chavs, charvers, spides, 'a bit Council', wide-os, asbos, bhangramuffins, rough trade, Waynes, Gazzers, Kevs (very popular in Bristol), Bed-mes (skanky girls from Bedminster, Bristol). And pikey.

But on the flip side we have cake-eaters, Hoorays, Sloanes, Henries, toffs, café society.

suzy (suzy), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)

and the fit-all term "wankers" that covers both ends of the spectrum

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

dog -- yeah i wz shocked to find 'barry' had no currency outside cb

'Pikey' is what chavs call travelling folk innit.

liz otm

ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 5 August 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

charver=olden slag meaning 'to fuck'. cf derek raymond books.

ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:00 (twenty-one years ago)

suzy,

Bedmies (often Bedmie Scum) tends to apply to everyone south of the river generically, even if it is inaccurate. I have two friends live over there - one still comes up to Gloucester Rd rather than go out over there. I've made it over that way twice in 6 years, and one of them was to go to the Hen & Chicken. A horrible place.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Gawd, there really isn't any need for "a bit council" is there? That's why Julie Burchill hated popbitch.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah yes, Garys and Kevs. You didn't go to a well-known public school in SW London, did you poopy?
-- Markelby (boyincorduro...), August 5th, 2004.

Nope. This was in Worcester, nowhere near SW London! I moved to London in 2001.

poopy, Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

i knew someone from worcester whose umbrella is still at my house.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not mine

poopy, Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

www.cafesocietyscum.co.uk

if only

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

do you want it anyway? yours for a sovernign ring

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

I remember my sister describing someone in her class as "a real Trish". It made me laugh.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Trish! better than Shelley!

We had "Trevors" at our school, except they were geeks/nerds with no dress sense. Where did you go to school Treble?

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Brazilian Street Children : THE SHAME OF OUR CITIES

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 13:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Reading ... the same school as Ricky Gervais

Treble (treble), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

dog, where'd you go?

ENRQ (Enrique), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

"Tracy" and "Sharon"?

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Highfield, Letchworth.

dog latin (dog latin), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I find it all a bit distasteful. The only group left that are ripe for invective = the white working class

Treble (treble), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I was waiting for my tram a few weeks back and encountered a gang of 15 year old Scallettes on the other platform. I could hear them all giggling as I approached and braced myself for a chorus of "my mate fancies you". Suddenly one of them hollered "Does this beautiful face come with a name?" It was bold as brass, and it was fucking hilarious. I wish I had a tenth of their attitude.

Tag (Tag), Thursday, 5 August 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

but the 'white working class' is not a homogenous entity - and these people are not 'representative' of it - so why should I mind seeing them mocked

they are maybe being ridiculed because of their correlation with acting as aggressive intrusive bigoted racist loutish inconsiderate wilfully ignorant bullies - but as i said above, that's not something it's easy to point and laugh at: so you pick the display material that goes with it
(the fact that other groups may have the same ingredients and have costumes/habits that are altogether more 'sophisticated' is a different problem - i've seen enough pisstakes of city-of-london boors and Daily Mail Mentalists to think it isn't an unrecognised one - and it shouldn't render this group immune from getting slagged off for being wankers)

they make many ppls lives a misery - mostly 'white working class' ppl too

fuckem

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 15:02 (twenty-one years ago)


they are maybe being ridiculed because of their correlation with acting as aggressive intrusive bigoted racist loutish inconsiderate wilfully ignorant bullies - but as i said above, that's not something it's easy to point and laugh at: so you pick the display material that goes with it

B-but this is a directly analogous to racism (other people look like people I have an objection to, therefore I will tar them all with the same brush)

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 5 August 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

A person's race is not the same thing as wearing a certain type of clothing, or talking in a funny nasal voice though, is it?

I think Snowy's post is pretty much spot on.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 5 August 2004 15:54 (twenty-one years ago)

so, this heed-the-baal business... it's actually head the ball, as in being a bit mental from taking one too many to the head? i've always misheard it as heed-the-bull, which i assume was someone reading to go off at moment's notice like a charging bull (they shake their heads around impatiently). interesting, kind of.

lauren (laurenp), Thursday, 5 August 2004 16:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Alba - i take yr point - i had a longer post trying to explain what i thought was different about it - some of which Pashmina has summarised in one line! - but while i think racism is indeed one form of a 'generalising' process, i don't think that makes all generalising processes analogous to 'racism' - there are situational particularities about 'generalising' (ahem) - we depend on it to function - the issues are to do with whether it decreases social justice in the name of someone's def. of 'efficiency', maybe...

Is any kind of mocking humour based on generalising (which might be an awful lot of it) to be 'directly analogous' to racism - eg jokes about certain occupations, or the upper/middle classes, or emo indiekids, or ironic trucker-hat wearers, or goths...(there's enough of that round here!)
or are you specially concerned about this because you think it is class-ical snobbery in disguise ?

Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 5 August 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

It's not as bad as racism, because no, you can't change the colour of your skin.

But it's still pretty bad - kids tend to wear clothes that let them fit into their peer group. Just because there is a disproportionate number of criminals in the tracksuit-wearing community doesn't mean it should effectively become a crime just to wear the same clothes.

Emo indiekids, ironic trucker-hat wearers and goths are just ridiculed. They aren't tarred with the brush of criminality and a generally crappy place in society isn't perpetuated.

It's impossible to argue this position without sounding like a sanctimonious prig.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 5 August 2004 18:31 (twenty-one years ago)

In Ireland we say "knackers" or "scumbags" or "scangers".

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Scobes" or "scumbags" is the word in Limerick, Ireland. Being effete and middle class (and outnumbered) i try not to use it tho.

(x-post)

fcussen (Burger), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Alba is probably right really. I think most of the time they're dehumanising terms for working class people, and I know I've had one or two debates with people who'd try and argue about "why THEY are ALL criminals" or something, these debates springing out of ones concerning the above words.

I think the issue of indie kids/goths/hipsters being ridiculed is a different one and not as serious no, though both trends are sort of conservative desire for homogeneity, just from different perspectives maybe.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

'knackers' is NOT the word for these guys in Ireland

fcussen (Burger), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

it is in Dublin.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

among people who don't distinguish between Travellers and the working class perhaps?

fcussen (Burger), Thursday, 5 August 2004 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Saying that it's not as bad as racism because you can't change the colour of your skin implies that people would be white if they could choose. Racism isn't wrong because people can't help being black, it's wrong because there's nothing wrong with being black in the first place. Whatever the definitions of chav and charver used to be, most the people I've come across using them in the last 6 months are using them as insults directed at the working class in general, not just the Borstal bound vandals who insult everyone in sight, and with the definition that most people seem to be using, you can't automatically assume everyone would love to be middle class if they had the choice. Perhaps for the money, but not for the culture. And if they do choose that, it's not easy to get there anyway. Sorry if this seems like I'm boiling it down to the simplest way of saying it and perhaps missing the point, but it also seems pretty disgusting to insult people for not being able to afford anything better.

Part time lurker, Thursday, 5 August 2004 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

That's totally twisting what I was saying! Of course I don't think it's a shame people can't all be white. And I don't want everyone to be middle class either, or to stop wearing tracksuits. Jesus!

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 5 August 2004 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I only brought the skin-changing thing up because, much as I'd like everyone to be able to be accepted whatever clothes they wear, at least clothing is a choice of sorts (albeit a limited one, as I tried to argue). Racism is worse because one doesn't even have the option of giving into the racists and changing one's skin to avoid prejudice.

Alba (Alba), Thursday, 5 August 2004 21:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, I'm not the most articulate person around (actually an ex chav. Or a current chav. Or possibly a never-at-all chav, I can never work out what it's supposed to mean, people seem to change the meaning during every internet convo I've seen to "What I (they) meant it to mean originally, but excepting anyone reading this"). I wasn't trying to suggest that you thought that, just that what you said was a bad analogy. I assumed it would be obvious no one would actually think that. I still think it's a bad way of putting it though. I don't think most of the qualities that have been recently associated with the word "chav" (whatever the original definition was) are an option taken by the people who do them anyway, and that the ones that are options (ie. dress sense, amongst other things) are things which should be accepted, not because they didn't have a choice in it, but because there's nothing wrong with it anyway. Criminal activity excepted, but then, the crimes of non-chavs haven't been discussed much, so I don't think that was ever part of the discussion. I'm not sure the racism analogy accurately described what was wrong with either racism or chavs.

Same person as above, Friday, 6 August 2004 01:50 (twenty-one years ago)

among people who don't distinguish between Travellers and the working class perhaps?

No among the entire country pretty much, most people I know actually say "traveller" to be honest, maybe with a degree of mockery but there you go. The time when "knacker" wasn't just the same as "chav" is a long time ago.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 6 August 2004 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

to be honest if I asked most people I know what "knacker" meant I'd wager more would describe the "chav" stereotype than say "a traveller" or an "itinerant" or whatever.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 6 August 2004 08:48 (twenty-one years ago)

knackers means bollocks innit - a lot like what's being said on this thread?

Saying that identifying chavs is a form of racism/classism is absolutely ridiculous. The fact that you can acknowledge their existence is reason enough to have a word for it. Whether you use it descriptively or as a term of abuse is different.
But the fact that in every suburban town centre there are people between the ages of 12 and 20 who invariably wear Burberry baseball caps, jackets with white cartoon scrawls all over them, super expensive trainers and tracksuit bottoms; who have little else to do than jeer and intimidate others; and who speak in a nasal voice etc. - is proof that they exist and therefore there is a term for it.
The Streets even glorify it - Mike Skinners songs, especially on the first album were all about how great it is to be a Barry. My little brother at one point went out of his way to achieve Ned-chic, even though he secretly liked Nirvana.
I dunno, this is all far too petty and PC for my liking.

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 6 August 2004 09:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you think you could identify a 'ned' or 'charver' from a picture? If so, and I think people can, it's clearly no longer based on behavioural traits, but instead on branding a cultural group as criminal. People don't wait until they see someone harrassing old ladies, shoplifting and spray-painting walls before they use the term.

The term is just unnecessary - I never use it and don't feel my communication is at all impoverished by the fact.

Kevin Gilchrist (Mr Fusion), Friday, 6 August 2004 09:13 (twenty-one years ago)

among people who don't distinguish between Travellers and the working class perhaps?
No among the entire country pretty much, most people I know actually say "traveller" to be honest, maybe with a degree of mockery but there you go. The time when "knacker" wasn't just the same as "chav" is a long time ago.
to be honest if I asked most people I know what "knacker" meant I'd wager more would describe the "chav" stereotype than say "a traveller" or an "itinerant" or whatever.
-- Ronan (ronan.fitzgerald6NOSPA...), August 6th, 2004.

Put it down to cultural differences I suppose. The only people I know who think 'knacker' is the same as the other two tend the be people who view the working class and travellers as one homogenous mass of criminality.

fcussen (Burger), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you think you could identify a 'ned' or 'charver' from a picture? If so, and I think people can, it's clearly no longer based on behavioural traits, but instead on branding a cultural group as criminal.

yeah i guess

http://www.scallycentral.com/images/competition2_Andy.jpg

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:13 (twenty-one years ago)

He could just be an assholish gheye hill walker. Look at the goretex on that!

Liz :x (Liz :x), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.scallycentral.com/galleries/netneds/images/kennedy_lyt.jpg

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

fcussen I guess so, I mean strictly speaking I think people KNOW that it originally referred to travellers but it's become the other. I do think the distinction is still made between the two, not that this is a big deal.

Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)

The term IS necessary- the fact that the usage of the word Chav has exploded over the last few months is an indication of this. It's as if the entire country has gone 'ahhh, THAT'S what they're called'. They were a group crying out for a name.

It only becomes problematic when the word's coupled with the word 'scum' really. It's a shame there couldn't be a more value neutral term.

I remember in Liverpool for instance that 'scally' was almost an affectionate term.

Bidfurd, Friday, 6 August 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

That's true about scallies, Bidfurd. In Manchester too. Lovable rogues. Artful dodgers.

Tag (Tag), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Do you think you could identify a 'ned' or 'charver' from a picture? If so, and I think people can, it's clearly no longer based on behavioural traits, but instead on branding a cultural group as criminal. People don't wait until they see someone harrassing old ladies, shoplifting and spray-painting walls before they use the term.
The term is just unnecessary - I never use it and don't feel my communication is at all impoverished by the fact.

I could identify a picture of a ned the same way I could a businessman or a Rastafarian. I don't think anyone said that they are criminals, though they do have a reputation for loutish behaviour - it's part of what makes them neds.
It's just a term to describe a certain group of people. What's the problem?

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe of course they're slightly different in urban and suburban settings??

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

neds have feelings too :(

(when they're not out of their heads on Buckfast)

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Ah Buckfast - the Fightin' Wine!!!!!!!!

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

monks don't fight!!

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I could identify a picture of a ned the same way I could a businessman or a Rastafarian.

Dog Latin - you may or may not be aware that in Scotland, the executive has launched an 'anti-ned' drive. I don't think you can see them doing that with businessmen or rastas. Clearly, some people just use these terms as youth culture slang. But this thread, as others, has demonstrated how it's mixed up with all sorts of other stuff too.

Alba (Alba), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)

an anti-ned drive? there's a law against neds?

dog latin (dog latin), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:51 (twenty-one years ago)

An Anti-Ned Drive - it's like a Spelling Bee or sumthin'

Dadaismus (Dada), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Crackdown on 'neds' will require extra £12m

Neds' offences not only against taste

Alba (Alba), Friday, 6 August 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

poor Ned

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

at first i thought the anti-ned drive alba said meant this

Holyrood urged to protect 'neds'

ken c (ken c), Friday, 6 August 2004 11:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, yeah, that's part of the whole thing. How many times have we had this whole discussion anyway?

Alba (Alba), Friday, 6 August 2004 11:12 (twenty-one years ago)

two weeks pass...
Pubs ban drinkers dressed in Burberry
(Filed: 20/08/2004)


Two city centre pubs have banned drinkers wearing certain brands of clothes in a crack down on alcohol-fuelled violence.



The Parody and Varsity, both in Leicester, have introduced strict clothing rules and banned brands including Stone Island, Aquascutum, Henri Lloyd and Burberry.

They have teamed up with police to compile a list of clothing they believe are worn by groups who regularly cause trouble in the city.

A spokesman for Barracuda, the company which owns Varsity and The Parody, said: "It is targeting a certain gang of young lads that have been causing concern in the area.

"People have been very understanding so far. It is quite common for different outlets to have different policies.

"There was already a no-trainers policy. This is just taking it a step further."

A police officer, from the city centre's violence and disorder team, said the policy was aimed at tackling a hard core of trouble-makers.

He said: "Well-known football hooligans have a particular dress code. These people are recognised as coming into the city centre day in, day out and causing trouble."

Michael White (Hereward), Friday, 20 August 2004 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.