Film People! Explain yourselves!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Um, right. So I ws looking at the collateral thread and the Bourne Supremacy thread etc, and theres something about them that kinda confuses me. Like, a lot of the people on those threads are dudes who I really really rate as posters (amater!st especially just seems really wise and shit-knowing, I like adam and slocki too).

But (and I know nothing about films, and I'd like to, so I totally don't want to come across as snooty or anything here) every one of these threads seems to be people saying "I AM REALLY EXCITED ABOUT X" where X is some thriller which seems kind of awful and formulaic and tired and then everyone going to see it on like the day of realease and then saying "Well that was sort of awful and formulaic and tired but I guess the bit where loads of shit blew up was kinda technically interesting".

Now, okay, I know nothing about cinema, but it seems like if you are a book buff or a music buff there is definitely a ton of stuff that you don't pay money to consume, 'cos you reckon it's kinda Not For You, because/despite popular? Is it an idea of Keeping Up, or like pretending that it all is Crazy Genius Vision to avoid the nagging feeling of "I cld do this better?". Or just some magic of cinema that's somehow closed to me?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean, I'm not trying to say YOU SHOULD ONLY WATCH OBSCURE IRANIAN IMPORTS, quite the opposite, I'm just kinda curious why y'all don't really?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

It somehow doesn't seem like a direct analogy with ILMers who like whiter-than-whte-label Crazy-Titch-feat-his-mum one-off grime promos and Toxic, somehow? Maybe it is. I don't know.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Why do people on this board get excited about Busted and Britney Spears?

Actually, I find that this board has an abundance of film snobs - Donnie Darko and Amelie getting a lot of hate especially.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

B..b..but Busted play hi-nrg guitar rock that doesn't make you feel guilty or dirty when you listen to it! Clearly they are better than the Bourne Supremacy.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Quickest derail ever!

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

it makes me feel sick when i listen to it greg.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, your syntax is totally turning into ronan's, dude!

I dunno. It just seems to me that a billion years of evolutions have finely honed us into efficient machines for liking Busted real good. Standing outside that is like, I dunno, living in trees or something.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:23 (twenty-one years ago)

in what way is my syntax like ronan's? the mind boggles.

your premise is flawed because people like busted because they're (apparently) good fun and blahblah - same as people like watching schlocky action fests, innit?

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:27 (twenty-one years ago)

hang on - yeh, i can see ronan posting what i posted.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Surely part of the feeling is that X Summer Blockbuster is AN EVENT? The increasing buildup, the feeling of anticipation, the social side, and the fact that its something that you can feel part of easily, whenever you want to an extent, with only a couple of hours out of your life or a few quid out of your pocket.

I'm not really a big film person, so I can't really relate to this, even though it happens several times a year. The level of hype around music or literature doesn't come close, especially pre-release, except in exceptional cases:

Harry Potter And The Order Of The Phoenix - the Be Here Now of books?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't speak as one of the dudes you mention Greg, and I don't comment on film threads much, but thinking about this, it's much easier for me to talk about how psyched I am to see something obviously genre-ish--witness my ebullience concerning samurai movies--than a film which stands more easily outside (or rises above) such a category--the latter I tend to quietly enjoy alone. This is probably because I'm only as articulate about film as "wasn't it rad when [x] happened?!"

sgs (sgs), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I think a lot of the time the "I am really excited about x" movies are actually really good. Have you seen Harold & Kumar, Collateral, Bourne Supremacy, etc. yourself?

Like, one could be a film dick and only watch Kubrick, Murnau, Herzog, and Cassavetes (for example) just like one could be a rockist asshole and only listen to Rush and Yes (or Velvet Underground and Roxy Music or Dizzy and Wiliey, etc); but it's funner to give them all a shot without surrendering your own critical facilities to the scales of the hegemony of whatever subculture you're most closely affiliated with.

Dan I. (Dan I.), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

it is quite natural to want the big budget studio movies to be good. they star our lust objects. they cost a lot of money (and the cinemas charge quite a lot to let us see them when they first open). so there's a lot riding on them even before you start to consider the plot, acting, direction, visual effects etc.

in a sense such films are disposable commodities just like a Busted single*. Some are good (Spiderman 2, "Thunderbirds Are Go!") and some you're disappointed by (insert your own movie/Busted examples here) but it's no biggie cos there'll a;ways be another one coming soon.

*I wasn't sure what point you were making with your ILM analogy, sorry. I'm not sure I'm a typical ILM poster any more tho'.

zebedee (zebedee), Monday, 9 August 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I like Matt and Zebedee and Sarah's things about Events, that's cool. I hadn't thought of that.

I guess what I meant with the ILM analogy is that stuff like Busted and Britney and, say, Legally Blonde/Spiderman I think of as being genre pieces where the genre is pop, whereas the atuff I'm talking aboutseems like standard genre stuff in non-pop genres, which ILM tends to to be way less keen on?

I haven't seen them, Dan - I probably will, and I'm sure I'll enjoy them. But I know nothing about film. I guess what I'm asking is: do mainstream-but-non-pop-genre films throw more of a bone to buffs than the equivalent in movies, books, etc?

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Monday, 9 August 2004 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Bourne Supremacy = Linkin Park i guess, yes.

dog latin (dog latin), Monday, 9 August 2004 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)

I think that (and this is partly a thread redirect to an earlier topic named something like 'What's the deal with I Love Film', but which I can't be bothered to look up) if one displays one's store-house of film-knowledge on ILE one is looked upon as instantly snobby, 'filmist,' broadly exclusionary, and picky. This is probably touching some sore-spots, but if one disagrees with a few IL-canonical films, one's already angered a lot of posters who feel incredibly strongly about those films. So it isn't always worth it (and doesn't seem to generate tons of discussion) to bring up anything less-than-mainstream on ILE.

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Here I enter into film-snob mode but 'Collateral' is an odd choice to pick on--it's directed by film snob fave (not with me necessarily) Michael Mann after all. 'Bourne Supremacy' is widely seen as being a 'superior' thriller and certainly its cast is very enticing if you like character actors. It's director won lots of praise and awards for 'Bloody Sunday' so it's not as if these film exist in a separate universe from Iranian imports (which have strong genre tendencies anyway).

Enrique (Enrique), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Also. All discussion seems to begin and end with genre comments (not meaning to pick on you, Enrique), which can kill threads on ILF but is more easily surmountable on ILE because of the sheer volume of posts.

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:35 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm still not sure what this is about, but thank you for liking me, that's nice.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Adam you are a treat!

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I AM REALLY EXCITED ABOUT X

I think that it is slocki that often says this, and I can tell you that he is genuinely excited about the prospect of seeing whatever movie has inspired him to type in all caps, but he knows when to call a spade a spade. Like with Sky Captain. Or The Aviator.

Somebody said this upthread but even the Iranian imports can be formulaic.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:48 (twenty-one years ago)

My version is this - who doesn't like Hollywood movies? I don't necessarily mean "high concept" films or blockbusters specifically, but movies with stars, set pieces, lush photography, etc. when they're done well? I think that this is the impetus behind the excitement for some of these films, and they do often disappoint. We can but hope.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:51 (twenty-one years ago)

The idea of 'keeping up' is interesting. With pop music you hear a lot of stuff without paying. In fact I hardly ever buy records these days but feel relatively comfortable talking about music. But with films you basically have to pay. You can wait a few years for TV, which is what I usually do, but if you don't live in London or New York most cinemas in the summer ONLY show big films. And I spose yeah you do want to 'keep up' because you like talking about films. In the same way that most ILMers probably did not buy 'Toxic' but have heard it countless times and talk about it lots.

ENRQ (Enrique), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)

dude, bittorrent!

ken c (ken c), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Natch - and given that most viewers (even many 'film snobs' around here) probably see like five hollywood flicks to one non-hollywood flick, isn't this a better place to start?

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)

I often feel the need to "keep up" with films and tend to get obsessive-compulsive about it. I am weaning myself off of this habit though, and thus I will not be seeing The Village.

Or should I? Oh no.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 12:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, okay, I know nothing about cinema, but it seems like if you are a book buff or a music buff there is definitely a ton of stuff that you don't pay money to consume, 'cos you reckon it's kinda Not For You, because/despite popular?

but yeah i think it kinda is a keep up thing, and it's so hard to know what a film is going to be like (bittorrent aside) without actually going to see it.

but then again people go and see bands sometimes that they'd never seen before! and buy books just by the way it looks! and then put them on the shelf again!

i guess a film is good too because at least it tells a story (which seeing a gig most of the time doesn't - it's hard to be immersed in a show if you don't know the songs), and is over in 1.5-3 hours (rather than a book which can be 293489282 pages long)

ken c (ken c), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:01 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm prolly a film snob but hardly ever go to the cinema. at the mo my 'wants' list is 'spartan' and 'spider-man 2', only the latter of which is on at my odeon. i sort of need to keep up bcz my friends, knowing i like films, often ask if i've seen 'x'. and i usually say 'no'. and they say, 'so why the fuck does anyone let you review films?' and i say 'uh, i was watching old movies instead'.

ENRQ (Enrique), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i think there are 'double standards' of sorts regarding the way people view pop music and film, but they are different beasts i guess - length being the most obvious difference. i just keep encountering people who seem keen to slate a film (Amelie? American Beauty? Attack Of The Clones?) but heap high praise on some mediocre (and i think the three films i mentioned are certainly no worse than mediocre, tho me being me i like them all) band or record - but it depends what you equate it to and i suppose for many the three films i mentioned would equate Zero 7, Fiona Apple and Good Charlotte or something.

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:02 (twenty-one years ago)

haha!

I actually ration out the "snob" movies and the more popular stuff, so if I've been watching a Victor Sjostrom season at the PFA, I will deliberately gorge myself on the likes of Harold & Kumar or Mean Girls for a couple of days.

Guilty. As. Charged.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:05 (twenty-one years ago)

it isn't a criticism of pop music, but because it is something that's on while you do the washing up or whatever, it's easier to have a basic knowledge of it than of film. i'm pretty familiar with this year's top 20 hits, but when it comes down to it i only see 1/10th of the films released. there just isn't time.

but otoh you might like films for certain aspects and find a lot about them shit -- so i like 'the bourne identity' despite a lot of lapses in basic things like plot, because the action is brilliantly and economically staged. but i won't tolerate that kind of mixed feeling about a pop song. there'll be another along in three minutes and... if they ain't cuttin then i put em on foot patrol.

ENRQ (Enrique), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

NORWICH - c/d s&d, etc.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

oops, wrong thread sorry! :(

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Bourne Supremacy is by the same guy that directed Bloody Sunday, which is some sort of masterpiece, so it was worth seeing just to find out what an indie director would bring to a big budget Hollywood movie. The answer? A lot, actually. Bourne Supremacy shares a certain hand-held documentary-style sensibility with Bloody Sunday, which makes the action (and even the inaction, come to think of it) extremely visceral rather than simply shoot 'em up exciting.

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:15 (twenty-one years ago)

there are lots of songs i like because they have good special effects, script/story, plot/twist/progression etc.

and i love a film with a good hook

the neurotic awakening of s (blueski), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

A Grand Don't Come For Free!

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd be more excited about The Toxic Avenger 5 than I would be The Bourne Supremecy.

C-Man (C-Man), Monday, 9 August 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

in response to the question, which i'm not sure what it is (forgive me i'm totally sick & delirious right now), uh, i like movies and i get excited about them! also a big part of my job is seeing hollywood blockbusterish movies so i obviously think about them a lot. also i think i have this eternal hope that they will be good, even if they are usually not.

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i watch film-snobby stuff too, but i guess i am more excited at the prospect of interesting discourse about films that fall outside that category (as there is already lots of informed & intelligent conversation about say iranian films)

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

forgive me i'm totally sick & delirious right now

Not you too! What's up?

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:15 (twenty-one years ago)

i've had this crazy fever for like 3 days straight, and now i suspect i have some sort of weird bacterial infection in one of my gums, so i am going to the doctor

s1ocki (slutsky), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

:(

Hope it gets better. Why are you never on AIM anymore? I have actually started using it now!

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway...film people! Explain yourselves!

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

In a minute! Jeez!

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I have seen Blackboards, that's Iranian, I quite enjoyed that, and Ali Zaova was good too.

A mixture of things is good, plus obscure Iranian films aren't often on in Ealing and I have to wait for my pal to tape them off BBC 4.

jel -- (jel), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I miss British television. It is actually very good for snob films, I think.

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

www.snobfilm.com

adam. (nordicskilla), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:20 (twenty-one years ago)

you also cant deny the appeal of bad movies either. i mean, some of these uber hollywood films have such fucking cheesariffic dialogue its funnier than most things that try and be intentionally funny. i, robot had about 15 of these types of moments and i thought it was great because of it..

bill stevens (bscrubbins), Monday, 9 August 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.