TS: Splitting the US into, say, 5 or 6 smaller independent nations?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Hare-brained Libertarian bullshit or canny, efficient governance?

Plus: NYC (or Chi or SF or...) will never have to associate with snaggle-toothed Fundies from the South anymore! Yee-haw!

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:08 (twenty years ago)

Well now at this point it seems like its becoming hare-brained Liberal bullshit too.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

...true. However, there is something to be said for small-scale gov'ts.

Cities often run much more efficiently and transparently than, say, the entire US gov't.

(and this is taking into account that most municipal govt's are hopelessly corrupt).

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:11 (twenty years ago)

We did this once already! According to the usual semi-comic blocks: a People's Republic in New England, a mid-Atlantic no-tax business haven, the South, Floricuba, Texahoma, the Great Lakes center-left state, the very-Canadian PacNorthwest + NoCal, the SoCal/Arizona/Nevada libertarian-wasteland bloc, etc etc etc.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:13 (twenty years ago)

There were some questions about divvying up the heartland and front range and how exactly Canada would react to another potential lawless libertarian freakshow through the Dakotas and Montana and Idaho.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:14 (twenty years ago)

http://www.businesstitusville.com/Discover_Titusville/Business_Location_Info/9NationsMap.jpg

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:16 (twenty years ago)

West Cal ain't gonna be associated with either AZ or NV.

Michael White (Hereward), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

We did? Where? I want to read it!

Also: those blocs are fantastic. I love how the South is still the same monolithic South.

NH might cause some problems with the People's Republic, though. I'd say New Hampshire and Maine should team up and do the wooly Live Free or Die thing.

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

Election: Urban vs Rural

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:18 (twenty years ago)

I like that Quebec is Quebec on that map haha

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:19 (twenty years ago)

Dude, you guys are too interested in cleanliness! The NE left needs New Hampshire and northern Maine to create a balance and an opposition stronghold. This is about diversity, people.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:20 (twenty years ago)

I am SO ready to be an Ecotopian. Number one national cash crop = WEED.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 14 March 2005 22:21 (twenty years ago)

http://blog.musselmanforamerica.com/archives/jland.jpg

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:22 (twenty years ago)

Yes, yes. (testily)

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:33 (twenty years ago)

Here it is. My suggestion was:

CASCADIA / SHASTA REPUBLIC: Washington, Oregon, northern California, Idaho (for balance), demilitarized zone bordering Nevada. ALASKA: give it to the Canadians; they'd take better care of it anyway. REPUBLICA DEL NORTE: southern California, Arizona, New Mexico, Utah, Colorado, waste contamination zone bordering Nevada; Hollywood versus Mormons FITE. NEVADA: a.k.a. New New Amsterdam; gambling, drugs, prostitution all legal, limit four guns per visitor. FREEMAN'S REPUBLIC: Montana, Wyoming, North and South Dakotas, Kansas, Nebraska; grain, guns, no speed limits, live free and miles away from anyone else or die. TEXAS / COMMONWEALTH OF OKLAHOMA: you know there's no way to get through this without giving Texas its independence, to which many of us will say good riddance; they can have Oklahoma but obviously they won't want to screw with the state's boundary outline by actually annexing it. WAUKEEGAN (GREAT LAKE NATION): Minnesota, Iowa, Wisconsin, Illinois, Indiana, Michigan, Ohio, northern Missouri; most desperate bids to develop near-obsolete production economies. ATLANTICA: New York, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, Delaware, Washington, D.C., West Virginia; most desperate legal loopholing to accomodate new-economy service industries -- a nationful of pharmaceutical marketers, consultants and stockbrokers, plus West Virginia to keep things interesting. PEOPLE'S MARITIME REPUBLIC: formerly known as "New England." DIXIE CONFEDERACY: "sorry about that war, it's all yours now; have fun with your laggard economy, embarrassing educational system, and never-ending race politics (NB don't make us invade you again)." FLORICUBA: in the wake of Castro's death, Floridian speculators pour money into Cuba in the hopes of creating a dual ocean resort nation to rival the tourist draw of Nevada; they are backed by other post-U.S. nations in an effort to counter the ambitions of the increasingly militarized Cuervo Republic, and Floricuba soon flourishes into a grand beautiful nation where formerly-Cuban dissidents rage against politicians' constant pandering to the entrenched authoritarian Gray Panther Party. HAWAII: have fun out there!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:39 (twenty years ago)

Do the United States of Canada take refugees from Jesusland? I want to emigrate now!

Quit glaring at Ian Riese-Moraine! He's mentally fraught! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:42 (twenty years ago)

HAWAII: have fun out there!

Nice.

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:45 (twenty years ago)

nabisco for President! (or at least Grand Poobah of Cascadia)

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 14 March 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)

Now that several years have passed I think there'd be some issues about drawing the dividing line of the Dixie Confederacy, which would lose a lot of northern territory to both the Great Lake Nation (lots of Kentucky) and Atlantica (parts of Virginia and theoretically even more parts of North Carolina). But every nation needs balance. The South could pour its energy into economic development, with Atlanta and pockets of NC as the promising high-tech service-economy models; it'd be a great help.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:54 (twenty years ago)

I seem to remember something about a war about this, some time ago...

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)

Plus, I think the South would see a lot of tourism. Seriously, foreigners LOVE the south. Well, my family does, at least (they're Irish).

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:55 (twenty years ago)

Quaint and Victorian. People eat that shit up.

sunburned and snowblind (kenan), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:56 (twenty years ago)

AND "full of character!"

...my parents just got back from a road trip down there. There's some hotel with ducks. DUCKS ON PARADE!

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)

Friendly and good food, too!

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:58 (twenty years ago)

all this "geographically correctness" is last millennium bullshit: it should be done alphabetically viz

nation A = everyone whose surname begins with a
nation B = etc

(obv they wd have cooler names than this, but who am i to insist what, as i wd be a citizen of nation S = greece)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

I wonder if it will happen in my lifetime that the South becomes "cool." I doubt it. I wonder what it would be like, though, if it were to happen.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Monday, 14 March 2005 22:59 (twenty years ago)

"my parents just got back from a road trip down there. There's some hotel with ducks. DUCKS ON PARADE! "

haha - that's the Peabody in Memphis. Which R0XX0R, btw.

Shakey Mo Collier, Monday, 14 March 2005 23:01 (twenty years ago)

nabisco, when you're Grand Poobah, do you promise to only send married drag queens as ambassadors to Texas and the Dixie Confederacy?

Michael White (Hereward), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:03 (twenty years ago)

THe Peabody! Sounds pretty great.

And, actually, I think the South WILL become cool. Because, secretly, it IS cool. It's not all backwards hicks and racial tension. (and, even more secretly, I kind of like backwards hicks, if not racial tension).

They have swimming holes!

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:05 (twenty years ago)

The Peabody is really, really fantastic. Memphis is really fantastic.

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:06 (twenty years ago)

all this "geographically correctness" is last millennium bullshit: it should be done alphabetically viz
nation A = everyone whose surname begins with a
nation B = etc

Mark, there's a children's book on this, it's called The Twenty-One Balloons. It's about these people who live on Krakatoa, and they create a utopian society there. It was a favorite of mine when I was a kid.

Shatterproof Glass (dymaxia), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

The South could be become a cultural powerhouse after the secession (like Ireland!).

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:10 (twenty years ago)

thx shatterproof! (k3rry is that u?)

in my plan the cultural powerhouse = the Ws

mark s (mark s), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:12 (twenty years ago)

What about China/Korea/other countries where "surnames" don't really exist in the same way? Do you, like, hate Asia or something?

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:14 (twenty years ago)

They use to debate endlessly about the North/South partioning of California, but an East/West split is preferrable. Arcata, Berkeley and Venice in one state, Needles, Truckee and Redding in the other.

andy --, Monday, 14 March 2005 23:15 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, Mark, that's me! In the book, the C's live in a Chinese house and cook Chinese food, the I's live like Italians, the G's are Germans (I think) and so forth.

Shatterproof Glass (dymaxia), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

I love how when people aren't happy with national politics (i.e. Dixie in 1860, Blue staters 2004) they want to leave but when they're getting their way, they're super patriotic (Dixie 2004, New England, Cali, etc 1861). The constitution is a compromise but I doubt if we could get anything much better.

andy, that's what I said above.

Michael White (Hereward), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

i think you can designate which part of yr name gets alphabetised

but only up to a point

eg not maRk s

mark s (mark s), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

cz that wd be silly

mark s (mark s), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

with Atlanta and pockets of NC as the promising high-tech service-economy models

actually, atlanta and chapel hill/raleigh/durham will be to dixie, what west berlin was to east germany -- pockets of (outside-run) sanity in a gigantic shithole.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:24 (twenty years ago)

Just for the record I'm pretty sure everyone of these comical independent-state suggestions would lead to general awfulness (even the lefty dream-states in the northern corners). Plus I bet everyone would chop out income taxes and just tax the hell out of the new "international" trade.

nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:26 (twenty years ago)

Hare-brained Libertarian bullshit or canny, efficient governance?

Some of both. In terms of democratic representation, it would be a huge improvement. Size works heavily against democracy. These six or seven nations would, of course, want to coordinate their defenses and to a large extent their foreign policy - sort of the way the original union of states was supposed to work.

That much said, it'll never happen until present economic and political conditions are a dim and distant memory. Maybe after the industrial economy collapses or something as drastic as that. Fun to talk about as a stimulus to original thining - as long as you don't believe it is The Future.

Aimless (Aimless), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:31 (twenty years ago)

k

Michael White (Hereward), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)

Fun to talk about as a stimulus to original thining - as long as you don't believe it is The Future.

Thread-killa!

giboyeux (skowly), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)

past is future:

http://www.texancultures.utsa.edu/publications/sntexas/images/Republic_of_Texas.gif

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:37 (twenty years ago)

the sane parts of this country (i.e., the blue states) should just use the red states/jesusland as our collective toilet -- send 'em nothing but our toxic and nuclear waste. it'll stop all the shit from washing up on the NJ shore and clean up fresh kills once and for all.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

"my parents just got back from a road trip down there. There's some hotel with ducks. DUCKS ON PARADE! "

haha - that's the Peabody in Memphis. Which R0XX0R, btw.

There are also Peabodies (with ducks!) in Little Rock and Orlando.

DUCKS ON PARADE ON PARADE!

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:44 (twenty years ago)

Eisbar, fuck off.

Texas is the only state that has the legal right to secede if we so chose since we were the only independant nation to ever be annexed. However I think the idea of the US splitting up is a pile of crap.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:48 (twenty years ago)

i would like to see the US split up, only if it has sexy results!

maria tessa sciarrino (theoreticalgirl), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)

Texas is the only state that has the legal right to secede if we so chose since we were the only independant nation to ever be annexed. However I think the idea of the US splitting up is a pile of crap.

It took a while but that was proved to be wrong by about May of 1865. You weren't annexed btw. You joined the Union. So too did the California Republic.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:02 (twenty years ago)

Texas is the only state that has the legal right to secede if we so chose since we were the only independant nation to ever be annexed.

Hawaii would more than likely take issue with that statement. I'll ask Queen Liliuokalani next time that I see her.

Pleasant Plains /// (Pleasant Plains ///), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

I knew I was forgetting somewhere.

Michael White (Hereward), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:06 (twenty years ago)

beat me to it PP! I did so many book reports on biographies of Queen L when I was young, I have no idea why.

teeny (teeny), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:35 (twenty years ago)

I'm pretty sure our get-out-of-the-union-free card was revoked with the Constitution of 1876 and the end of Reconstruction.

milozauckerman (miloaukerman), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

I like the idea that THE ENTIRE SOUTH is still stuck in the Civil War and would like to form the C.S.A. again.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 01:37 (twenty years ago)

and/or that race is the most important issue here right now

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 01:39 (twenty years ago)

History doesn't stand still and I do wonder what the future will exactly hold. I sorta presume the US as it stands will be around for many moons yet, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 01:41 (twenty years ago)

Texas is the only state that has the legal right to secede if we so chose since we were the only independant nation to ever be annexed.

Vermont, too, was a sovereign until 1791.

I sorta presume the US as it stands will be around for many moons yet, though.

Ned, you're a party pooper!

jim wentworth (wench), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 03:58 (twenty years ago)

This thread wouldn't even be necessary if the notion of states' rights hadn't been almost entirely abandoned by this point. GET ONE EFFECTIVE BUREAUCRACY.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 15:01 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.