Condescending to kids - c/d?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I was listening to this indie rocker play "kids songs" that he wrote the other night. Musically and lyrically, they were very simple. The verses typically consisted of one line repeated over and over, with another repeated line for the chorus. The music was pretty much the same four chords, also repeated for the duration of the song. Now there's nothing wrong with simple music, but is it valid to excuse simple songs by saying that they are for children? Obviously if your audience is kids, you may have to use their vocabulary, stay away from polysyllabic words or whatever. But to me, music and the emotions expressed through music and lyrics are based on a gut reaction, a gut reaction that kids are perfectly capable of having. Kids can understand sadness, anger, happiness, love, etc. So why do people who make music for kids feel like they have to play dumb? Do they have to play dumb?

Other topics: literature and movies for kids. I think they have improved, have allowed for the fact that kids are attracted to darker and more emotionally involved themes, and seem to have moved away from Rainbow Brite/Care Bears shit. See: Lemony Snicket, continued popularity of Roald Dahl, etc.

TV shows still seem pretty dire, from what I've seen. The Saturday morning cartoons look cheap, aren't funny or "smart" in any way. But kids watch them. So maybe I'm overestimating kids.

Also: adults who talk in "baby talk" to babies instead of speaking normally? Good thing or bad thing? I have seen news stories on "scientific studies" that say both.

Caveat emptor: I don't have kids and am rarely around kids. So I am probably talking out of my ass.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:03 (twenty years ago)

kids are smart. i think people (writers, musicians, whatever) should aim a little OVER their heads, rather than under

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

that's how you learn!!

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:06 (twenty years ago)

Totally.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:07 (twenty years ago)

I had a lot of contempt for "kid stuff" - tv shows in particular - as a kid. So, DUD.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:08 (twenty years ago)

Kids are smarter than us all. You should be worried.

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:10 (twenty years ago)

Baby noises are fine, you don't have to talk to babies like that all the time, they dig a mixture of sounds. The same with older kids. Most of the time I talk to my kids sensibly and intelligently and they respond. Sometimes we talk stupid and make fart noises. It's all good.

I don't know what cartoons you've seen, but some of the kids cartoons at the moment are on fire. Spongebob, obv, and Fairly Odd Parents are super surreal masterpieces, way better than most of what was made for TV in the past.

Anti-Pope Consortium (noodle vague), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

slocki totally otm.

hstencil (hstencil), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

Dud in general, and speaking in baby-talk, double-dud. Slocki OTM, challenge them and they'll turn out little Einsteins.

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

DUD

i knew about some things in life waaaay before anyone told me.

i learnt through books films etc, i was well above my age reading wise...

battlingspacemonkey (battlingspacemonkey), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:12 (twenty years ago)

Ditto.

I always hated it when I was a kid and they kept coming out with "Muppet Babies" and "Flintstone Kids" and all this stuff that made characters into kids or were centre on children.
I was a kid, I knew what that was like. I got enough of that Sunday through Friday. On Saturday morning, I wanted to learn about grown-ups.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

t/s: dumb entertainment for kids vs dumb entertainment for adults

teeny (teeny), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:14 (twenty years ago)

winner is:

dumb entertainment for kids that more adults than kids watch

tissp! (the impossible shortest specia), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

http://www.wiseandbarking.com/jazz_pic.jpg

Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:15 (twenty years ago)

I don't have cable so my judgement of kids TV shows is probably skewed.

n/a (Nick A.), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:19 (twenty years ago)

Dud. Unequivocally. Also dud: adults who talk about nothing but Harry Potter and y/a lit. Talk about fetishizing youth! Sheesh.

The Milkmaid (of Human Kindness) (The Milkmaid), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:21 (twenty years ago)

So far as I can tell, kids really like complex arrangements and orchestrations. (This might be why the animatronic bears in my local childhood Chuck E. Cheese's only played Beach Boys songs.)

I know of plenty of smart TV shows for older kids, but I have no idea what the 5-8 demographic would be watching.

nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:22 (twenty years ago)

That reminds me of some "news" story I saw on tv this morning, which was about whether the new Harry Potter book was too scary for children because it has murder and deaths in it. That kind of attitude really irritates me. When I was a kid I would read tons of books and stories that had murders or deaths in them, they were often some of the best books to read! I don't think it helps children at all to be sheltered from anything remotely scary or bad about life. I think it is much more harmful to children to expose them only to bland, safe, simple things.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:23 (twenty years ago)

i think i'm kind of wrong here, but what the hell:

On the state of children's entertainment

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:24 (twenty years ago)

I watched the Rocky and Bullwinkle Show growing up. This lead me to believe making puns was socially acceptable. Be careful what you wish for.

laurence kansas (lawrence kansas), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

hahaha for that reason the xanth books should totally be banned

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:27 (twenty years ago)

I agree that kids aren't stupid and are capable of listening to more complex things than Barney songs. But kids do get a lot out of simplicity and repetition. Maybe because they're more perceptive than adults are, but they get more out of a simple song than an adult does.

Not to say they shouldn't be exposed to more complex ideas also. The broader their experiences, the better.

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:32 (twenty years ago)

Ha ha, Lawrence. I have that same problem. I used to watch R&B every morning before school (in the '80s), not even realizing that it was an old show because Boris and Natasha still seemed timely.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:33 (twenty years ago)

Dud. Kids don't care if there are bits in films they don't understand, as long as they know who the bad guys and the good guys are. Do you remember the part in Star Wars about the Senate being disolved from when you were little? Of course you don't, you remember Luke flying his X-Wing and Han shooting stormtroopers. All that matters is that the plot is presented in broad enough terms for kids to follow it.

chap who would dare to thwart the revolution (chap), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:35 (twenty years ago)

Geyser OTM.

Anti-Pope Consortium (noodle vague), Friday, 22 July 2005 15:36 (twenty years ago)

Having spent the better part of the last two years working with 4 year olds, I've learned two things:

(1) Kids are easier and more fun to be around when you interact with them as "adults." By which I mean: not dumbing down your language, making obscure cultural references, etc. They LOVE it because kids naturally want to feel like they're "on the team."

(2) Kids are stupid. When things go pear-shaped, you have to remember that they are totally unreasonable.


Basically: everyone OTM.

giboyeux (skowly), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:00 (twenty years ago)

But kids do get a lot out of simplicity and repetition.

So do I.

JimD (JimD), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:01 (twenty years ago)

xpost to what Nicole said: "Classics" of children's lit like The Wolves of Willoughby Chase, Witch of Blackbird Pond, Oliver Twist are about 10x scarier than Harry Potter because they involve children being tormented by society/relatives, not just eeevil magic people. Remind these people who complain to read The Diary of Anne Frank again.

jocelyn (Jocelyn), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:02 (twenty years ago)

i think its more about fun than dumbing songs, tv shows etc down. kids up to a certain age don't feel the need to avoid goofy 'dumb' stuff they find fun in order to appear smart like adults do. if kids dont like something, they dismiss it without rationalising it to death. im talking pre-school kids here.

i dont think tv shows or songs need to be dumbed down or smarted up for kids. ive found that kids, whether you teach them or not, will pick up knowledge quickly and independently. i have a four year old niece who constantly suprises all of us (her family) by coming out with new language, social skills, actions etc that none of us have taught her and, most of the time, that none of us can work out where she might have been exposed to them. often theyre silly things like her sitting in the car with my mother and suddenly singing 'what about me' word for word or the time i was standing on a sidewalk in nyc with her, waiting for her parents, when i watched her walk a ways down the street, stand in a doorway with her back to me in a pose that ive only seen adults use - slouched at the hip with one leg out on the sidewalk, one hand on her hip the other holding her littlest mermaid phone (a piece of plastic that makes a ringing noise when you hit a button) to her ear - and hearing her saying 'mm hmm...yeah...uh huh...ok...well, goodbye for now' or how when she was two she suddenly started her responses with 'well, actually....' even though none of us do that regularly. i remember being 4 and playing with our then neighbour's pianola and teaching myself songs by watching when the keys would go up and down. my mom almost had a heartattack when i came came home one day and played 'the entertainer' on our piano for her. these are silly, cute things but they show independent learning.

i guess what im saying is that kids are going to have the concepts of 'smart' and 'dumb' (which are evil, subjective judgements anyway) shoved down their throats at school and on throughout their adult lives. i dont think its going to harm their developing intelliengence to just let them have goofy, silly fun and discover their own interests. i just wish more adults could let go a little and do the same thing.

anyway, kids are learning every minute of the day whether you think they're being taught or not.

sunny successor (he hates my guts, we had a fight) (katharine), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

anyway, kids are learning every minute of the day whether you think they're being taught or not.

MOST OTM THING EVER TYPED

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

I'm constantly baffled and frustrated by the popular notion of what makes for good "children's music", for one because children have a remarkable ability to grasp music regardless of it's complexity, and all these Raffis and Kids Bop CDs and whatnot are essentially exercises in adult ignorance. I mean, kids aren't necessarily going to enjoy, like, a 12-minute Dream Theater epic or anything, but who the fuck does besides guitar nerds?

I sometimes wonder if the notion that children will embrace simple, plain things is like some kind of subconscious adult envy of a child's imagination, as if adults' subconsciouses are all like "yeah, well, fuck you for having such a great imagination, I'm not going to try hard to stimulate your mind with my music/film/etc. because I know you don't really need it".

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

That reminds me of some "news" story I saw on tv this morning, which was about whether the new Harry Potter book was too scary for children because it has murder and deaths in it. That kind of attitude really irritates me. When I was a kid I would read tons of books and stories that had murders or deaths in them, they were often some of the best books to read! I don't think it helps children at all to be sheltered from anything remotely scary or bad about life. I think it is much more harmful to children to expose them only to bland, safe, simple things.

I think this depends on the book and child. A lot of kids really identify with Harry Potter and because of that, this book could truly upset them. hell, it deeply depressed me and I'm an adult! I would be cautious about a v. young child reading it. It's not that there are deaths and violence in it, what's disturbing is who dies and how.

Miss Misery (thatgirl), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

All kids should see "Bad Santa" around the holidays.

deej.., Friday, 22 July 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)

BEST KIDS' RECORD EVER:

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

So should we only play Ligeti tone poems for kids?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:33 (twenty years ago)

hahahahaha

I think all children who find themselves emotionally invested in works of fiction are going to have to face these huge watersheds like in the Harry Potter book. For me it was probably Transformers: The Movie and having to see Optimus Prime die. However, I don't think it's a good idea to shield them from these things, as they are probably integral in helping them better understand REAL death.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Hmm, one more time.

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

Also: kids generally seem better at dealing with death than adults.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

Maybe because they don't understand it as well, or maybe because they're not as afraid of it.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

This thread is reminding me how much Raffi pisses me the fuck off.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:37 (twenty years ago)

I sometimes wonder if the notion that children will embrace simple, plain things is like some kind of subconscious adult envy of a child's imagination,....

Well, it has been studied many times with the conclusion that kids enjoy and learn from simplicity and repetition. Although, the testing may be self-fulfilling prophecy/subconscious....

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:47 (twenty years ago)

I really like the Saint Etienne Up the Wooden Hills EP which is supposedly for kids. However, I think kids would really like most of their grown up stuff too!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:49 (twenty years ago)

This Lukas has enjoyed, this week:

March of the Penguins
Animal Collective "We Tigers"
Gorillaz Demon Days
everything Waspinator from Transformers: Beast Wars says
the part in LOST when Hurley is trying to get Jin to pee on his foot

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

haha, THINGS he has enjoyed

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:54 (twenty years ago)

Adults are allowed to read and talk about y/a fiction (incl. Rowling) if they want to. But I agree that they are not allowed to be huge Harry Potter nerds and talk about "oh that lady at the bank would DEFINITELY be in Hufflepuff" and shit like that, cause that ain't right.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:56 (twenty years ago)

I've noticed that I get more positive reactions from kids when I talk to them like I would anyone (with less swearing, mind you). I think kids like the idea of being treated as adults, or equals, or being listened to. Crazy, I know.

matlewis (matlewis), Friday, 22 July 2005 16:59 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I'm around kids a lot and I just talk to them like people. And then someone will come up all babytalk and say shit like, "Are you in first grade? Ye-ah! Yes you ARE!" And not only does it drive me crazy, but the kid shuts down and withdraws and doesn't really want to talk any more.

geyser muffler and a quarter (Dave225), Friday, 22 July 2005 17:11 (twenty years ago)

Dud, because by age six I would rather have listened to The Sisters of Mercy. Honestly. I would've put Floodland in the CD player.

Kitten, the body needs it, the body cries out for Ian Riese-Moraine! (Eastern Ma, Saturday, 23 July 2005 00:05 (twenty years ago)

Hey the first Raffi LP is not bad but he went downhill from there. My 1 yr. old daughter digs it but she also likes similar stuff like Syd Barrett. Anything really poppy and happy with a good beat will make her dance though. So I think there are certain sounds that kids respond well too but it doesn't necessarily have to be some kidz bop crap or something.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 23 July 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)

I hereby have read your post, Aja.

Twice (once was quoted)

-- OLD SPICE® CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (BLACKOP...) (webmail), July 22nd, 2005 7:37 PM. (ex machina) (later) (link)

OLD SPICE® CHEMTRAILS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! (ex machina), Saturday, 23 July 2005 00:28 (twenty years ago)

There should be more dubwise music for children. Wild sound effects, thumping basslines, creative and playful drumming -- damn, that'd be sweet!

Kitten, the body needs it, the body cries out for Ian Riese-Moraine! (Eastern Ma, Saturday, 23 July 2005 00:30 (twenty years ago)

That reminds me of how much I loved Sgt Pepper's as a kid (though yeah, obv not dub)

rrrobyn (rrrobyn), Saturday, 23 July 2005 00:47 (twenty years ago)

Perrey & Kingsley is good for babies. Dub might be a little too slow & spacey.

walter kranz (walterkranz), Saturday, 23 July 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)

i am amazed by how *strange* are all the newer cartoon shows for kids. shows were a lot more conventional, less loopy when i was growing up. they followed old adventure-story narrative patterns and stuff. the new ones are more like 30-minute-long "looney toons" episodes on uppers.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:12 (twenty years ago)

btw i don't think that's a good or a bad thing, it's just a thing. it makes children's tv more tolerable for adults probably, for what that's worth.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:12 (twenty years ago)

what do you all think would happen if i raised a kid today w/o tv or the internet or stuff like that? would they spend every afternoon "studying" with friends, would they turn early to the crank, or what?

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:13 (twenty years ago)

i'll say it for the thousandth time: kids are amazing, it's the adults who always fuck everything up.

bela lugosi meets a brooklyn gorilla (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:17 (twenty years ago)

Keep 'em off the tv for the first five or six years, and stay off the tv yourself so they won't see it as forbidden fruit — read to them every day so they develop a love of books by the time they start school — they won't be too addicted to tv later on. Aside from a couple of anime series, all my daughter's interested in is the Netflix queue and how much of her stuff she can push to the top.

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:21 (twenty years ago)

(xpost) that said, i saw this really rad sweet smart little girl today at the airport. i'm so used to watching moms taking their aggression out their children or just flat out ignoring them, but this girl's mom was engaging with her kid, getting her to behave well by giving her fun activities, and basically just treating her like a person instead of a, y'know, mistake.

bela lugosi meets a brooklyn gorilla (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:25 (twenty years ago)

Back 20 years ago my wife and I went to a Benihana and were seated with a mother and her son, who was probably seven or eight. The mom was just like you describe, Jody — out having a good time with someone who just happened to be a lot smaller. And he was polite, enjoying himself, not shy or hyper. A bit of a marvel, and J. and I thought "maybe we could make one like that."

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:31 (twenty years ago)

yeah, when i see cool kids it gives me hope for the future.

bela lugosi meets a brooklyn gorilla (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:32 (twenty years ago)

Also: kids generally seem better at dealing with death than adults.

Yeah, when I was little and saw Bambi at the theater, the only people who cried were the moms!

tokyo nursery school: afternoon session (rosemary), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:40 (twenty years ago)

maybe because most kids are totally confused about death and don't know what it means?

the little kids i've known who have lost grandparents or other relatives usually start talking about them either as if they'll return next week or they'll be hanging around as ghosts.

i dunno, i don't like to romanticize children, which sort of seems like what's happening here.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 02:47 (twenty years ago)

http://www.rockwoodcomic.com/toons/01-0727.GIF

Tumililingan (ex machina), Saturday, 23 July 2005 03:14 (twenty years ago)

also i cried at "bambi"

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 03:20 (twenty years ago)

but that has less to do with any concept of "death" as much as it does the possibility of being separated from your mother

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Saturday, 23 July 2005 03:21 (twenty years ago)

I think most children would be very happily entertained by a variety of things, from things that advertise themselves as being geared toward children to things that are patently adult. I mean, it probably wouldn't be a good idea to have a small child watch an R-rated movie (unless it's a very intelligent one and there's adult supervision, a la what my mom did when I was seven - eight and accompanying her to Fatal Attraction and Wall Street showings in the theater), but restricting a child to nothing but a diet of either kids' fare or a life of being a grownup doesn't strike me as being rather healthy for the child. The child still needs to know that he or she is a child and should feel connected with their child-ness, but at the same time, they shouldn't be made to feel that they can't be entrusted with anything from the mature adult world.

And I truly believe in my heart of hearts that almost every single child out there seems to handle death better than an adult would because they can't really absorb the full implications of the death at the time they're experiencing it. At a later date, after thought turns into reminisces, the former-child individual will begin experiencing some of the impact of their previous losses, but children don't really get all that's going on. And I am speaking from a position of experience here.

The Kind and Benevolent Oracle of Dee (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 July 2005 05:26 (twenty years ago)

And I don't see anything wrong with a certain measure of cooing when the child is still in his/her infancy, but after their third birthday or so, yes, it should be time to start talking to them as regular human beings, though not the way that the adult would talk to another adult. Respect without delusion, you know? Regular voice pitch and cadence but not the super-charged vocabulary terms * and mature themes that often pop up in adult-adult conversation.

* Though I'm not saying be monosyllabic -- just regular words.

The Kind and Benevolent Oracle of Dee (Dee the Lurker), Saturday, 23 July 2005 05:32 (twenty years ago)

Its funny thinking kids songs need to be simple, when you think about some of the cool stuff that was on the original 70s Sesame St shows. Remember the counting song with the pinball machine animation? It was a funky disco number, and I loved it. It was cool enough that mates of mine's band did a cover of it some years back.

As a kid, I loved the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack, especially that "fire on disco mountain" or whatever it was called, the funked up classical number - I used to dance around doing movement based stories to it, like a ballet. My parents had next to no records and I hated the ones they did have (Barbara Streisand, urgh. I particularly hated country music too, and still do, and I dont know why).

Trayce (trayce), Saturday, 23 July 2005 05:46 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.