Atheists identified as America’s most distrusted minority

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
they needed a study to figure this out?

Pablo (Pablo A), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:57 (twenty years ago)

oh please!

petlover, Friday, 7 April 2006 23:59 (twenty years ago)

take that, communists!

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Friday, 7 April 2006 23:59 (twenty years ago)

You can't trust people who believe in reality.

Sparkle Motion's Rising Force, Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:01 (twenty years ago)

http://www.icr.org/i/articles/btg-a/btg-052a.gif

Pablo (Pablo A), Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:04 (twenty years ago)

I don't believe it!

Jeff LeVine (Jeff LeVine), Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:13 (twenty years ago)

It's 'cause theists make the mistake of believing that religion=ethics.

naus (Robert T), Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:23 (twenty years ago)

ya think?

Frogm@n Henry, Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:30 (twenty years ago)

I had a high school history teacher (self-defined "liberal" but over the course of the year we all realized her husband was converting her into a psycho fascist) who literally spent an entire class period trying to argue that people who have no religion have no real grounds for morality. I wanted to scream very loudly.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:33 (twenty years ago)

One of the trainers at my new job is a Godjunkie, and was on a tear one day about how Thomas Jefferson was a devout Christian and the first amendment is about the freedom to pick a religion and be free of atheist influence. If I didn't really need this job, I'd have loved to rip that one to pieces.

Austin Still (Austin, Still), Saturday, 8 April 2006 00:36 (twenty years ago)

where were you a couple weeks ago the first time this was discussed? I ask because let me tell you it's no fun being an illegal alien.

Phil C., Saturday, 8 April 2006 01:37 (twenty years ago)

If only "ILXors" had been a category...

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Saturday, 8 April 2006 02:04 (twenty years ago)

[quote]Americans rate atheists below Muslims, recent immigrants, gays and lesbians and other minority groups in “sharing their vision of American society.”[/quote]

What's this "vision of american society" crap?

they think atheists can't get fat, or take too many drugs, or sit at home and watch 10 hours of television a day?

nicky lo-fi (nicky lo-fi), Saturday, 8 April 2006 07:00 (twenty years ago)

When you think about it, it kind of makes sense. I mean, I have very few friends who are religious in any way. At the same time, though, I'm not sure I know anyone who would come right out and say "I'm a atheist. There is no kind of higher power whatsoever." It's hardcore. More people would self-identify as "agnostic," which is much less... confrontational.

Admittedly this distinction may be lost on a lot of true believers.

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Saturday, 8 April 2006 14:39 (twenty years ago)

The most outspoken atheists I know are, coincidentally or not, generally speaking anti-American and lack a positive opinion of just about anything. That isn't to say that all atheists are negative, but the ones who run around telling anyone who will (or won't) listen that there is no god generally possesses other characteristics which are perceived as negative. The distrust could result from experiences with such people.

mantilla, Saturday, 8 April 2006 15:39 (twenty years ago)

Atheists are also the minority group most Americans are least willing to allow their children to marry.

I am an atheist, but my husband's parents "allowed" him to marry me.

Scratch an agnostic, find a theist. They're hedging their bets because they're still afraid of going to hell. I don't see why any atheist would say they're an agnostic. Total wuss move.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 15:56 (twenty years ago)

I still Take The Lord's Name in Vain, though. All the goddamn time.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:00 (twenty years ago)

Christ on a Fucking Crutch!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:02 (twenty years ago)

Stuff like this makes me so grateful that the UK is a genuinely secular country.

chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:05 (twenty years ago)

The most outspoken atheists I know are, coincidentally or not, generally speaking anti-American and lack a positive opinion of just about anything. That isn't to say that all atheists are negative, but the ones who run around telling anyone who will (or won't) listen that there is no god generally possesses other characteristics which are perceived as negative. The distrust could result from experiences with such people.

i used to work with a guy like that. he belonged to some sort of atheist organization. atheism was his religion.

once you stop believing in god, shouldn't god cease to be a big deal? guess those religious atheists feel really put upon by society's theistic religiosity or something. jerks. they're like people who brag about not having tv.

doubt the people in the survey were basing their distrust of atheists on negative experiences though.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:23 (twenty years ago)

I can't speak for myself (as I alluded to, being an atheist is no big deal in this country), but if I lived in a place where my beliefs were constantly portrayed as being inherently unpatriotic and even immoral, then yes, I would feel a little put upon.

chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:33 (twenty years ago)

google translation of an excerpt of Michel Onfray "Traité d’athéologie"

"to defend the values of the enlightenment against the magic proposals, it is necessary to promote a post-Christian secularity , namely atheistic, militant and radically opposed to any choice of company between the Western Judeo-Christianity and the Islam which fights it. Neither the Bible, nor Coran. With the rabbis, with the priests, with the imams, ayatollahs and other mollahs, I persist in preferring the philosopher. All these abracadabrantesques theologies, I prefer to call some with the alternative thoughts with dominant philosophical historiography: laughers, materialists, radicals, the cynical ones, hedonists, atheists, sensualists, the voluptuous ones. These know that there is only one world and that any promotion of a back world makes us lose the use and the benefit of only which is. A really mortal sin..."

S. (Sébastien Chikara), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:39 (twenty years ago)

i'm remembering more about this guy. he had been a taoist and to prove it was all - see i have taoist tattoos. anyway, he was beaten badly with a baseball bat, declared dead and then resuscitated. this is when he switched over to atheism. because, as he said - i died and nothing happened. to which i responded - but you didn't die. and he was like - i was legally dead. and i was all - yeah but you're alive.

the conversation didn't really go anywhere.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:40 (twenty years ago)

I can't speak for myself (as I alluded to, being an atheist is no big deal in this country), but if I lived in a place where my beliefs were constantly portrayed as being inherently unpatriotic and even immoral, then yes, I would feel a little put upon.

well i'm an atheist and i live in america (although i'm a buddhist which puts me in some sort of strange middle ground) and while i do occasionally feel put upon by christians, i can appreciate that their situation is complex - containing good and not so good qualities, and a lot of inbetween.

i find the superior attitude that a lot of atheists display to be particularly retarded, because while they may not be classic monotheists they still display theistic attitudes - just with different objects of veneration: material things, science, themselves, aggression, etc.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 8 April 2006 16:53 (twenty years ago)


Yes. religions carry in them the hatred of oneself and freedom

S. (Sébastien Chikara), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:01 (twenty years ago)

i find the superior attitude that a lot of atheists display to be particularly retarded, because while they may not be classic monotheists they still display theistic attitudes - just with different objects of veneration: material things, science, themselves, aggression, etc.

OTM

Exhibit A:

Scratch an agnostic, find a theist. They're hedging their bets because they're still afraid of going to hell. I don't see why any atheist would say they're an agnostic. Total wuss move.

-- Beth Parker (marthasminion...), April 8th, 2006.

latebloomer: someone's been drinking my youth! (latebloomer), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:07 (twenty years ago)

glad someone else caught that.

well i'm an atheist and i live in america (although i'm a buddhist)

my guess is that most americans, while thinking you are "weird," would not classify you as an atheist. buddhism is seen a religion.

if I lived in a place where my beliefs were constantly portrayed as being inherently unpatriotic and even immoral, then yes, I would feel a little put upon.

welcome to the world of democratic voters and "liberals."

someone let this mitya out! (mitya), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:14 (twenty years ago)

I can't speak for myself (as I alluded to, being an atheist is no big deal in this country), but if I lived in a place where my beliefs were constantly portrayed as being inherently unpatriotic and even immoral, then yes, I would feel a little put upon.

OTM

once you stop believing in god, shouldn't god cease to be a big deal?

First of all, who said that atheist believed in God in the first place. Secondly, it seems to me (compared to Britain) that God is a big deal in America, whether someone wants it to be or not.

Teh HoBBler (the pirate king), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:28 (twenty years ago)

Absolutely, especailly as the US seems to be increasing governed according to a fundamentalist Christian agenda.

chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:32 (twenty years ago)

my guess is that most americans, while thinking you are "weird," would not classify you as an atheist. buddhism is seen a religion.

true. put upon wasn't really what i meant - aside from a little teasing when i was a kid, i've never really experienced the intolerance reflected in the poll. of course if i'd grown up in rural missipppi rather than a wealthy boston suburb things probably would've been different. And now i live in nyc, so i've pretty much been ensconced in the low murmur of npr my whole life.

i guess what i meant was disturbed. our crusading government being the most disturbing example of christianity resembling nothing more than a social disease. on the other hand, i think atheists are perfectly capable of starting wars. i mean, you think dick cheney believes in god?

First of all, who said that atheist believed in God in the first place.

just using that timeline as a device. sure there was a better way to say it.

jhoshea (scoopsnoodle), Saturday, 8 April 2006 17:53 (twenty years ago)

Exhibit A:

I'm a Leo, so sue me.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 18:59 (twenty years ago)

(joke)

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 18:59 (twenty years ago)

lol

latebloomer: someone's been drinking my youth! (latebloomer), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:12 (twenty years ago)

The reason for my apparently aggro statement (though I certainly didn't think I was being so horrible, being a genial sort and not an America-hater either), was a conversation I had with my brother-in-law a while ago. He was disappointed in my niece for identifying herself as an atheist. He said that she should say she's an agnostic, because it doesn't offend, or something to that effect. But an atheist is not the same as an agnostic, and why would one say they're the other so as not to "offend?" What's "offensive" about being an atheist, anyway? Sheesh. If people put you in the position of having to say what your belief system is, then replying truthfully is NOT "confrontational."
Anyway, I'm sure there are plenty of people out there offended by agnosticism, too.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:13 (twenty years ago)

Anyone who's offended because you believe different things to them fucking deserves to be offended.

chap who would dare to be a stone cold thug (chap), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:15 (twenty years ago)

i find the superior attitude that a lot of atheists display to be particularly retarded, because while they may not be classic monotheists they still display theistic attitudes - just with different objects of veneration: material things, science, themselves, aggression, etc.

Setting aside my dismay at being lumped in with these nasty folks, I must ask you, jhoshea, do you really encounter that many people like this? Seems a little over-the-top, but if it's true, my condolences.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:21 (twenty years ago)

"He was disappointed in my niece for identifying herself as an atheist. He said that she should say she's an agnostic, because it doesn't offend, or something to that effect"

oh ok, well then he's just being an idiot there.

my beef with your statement was just that i don't think it's accurate to generalize all agnostics as being simply closet theists afraid to commit to a strong position. while it certainly may be that many are like that, most agnostics i'd assume just aren't convinced either way about the existence of god, or whether questions like that are even knowable.

(for the record i consider myself atheist or 'non-theist' in that i don't believe in a personal god or gods. and that's about as far as my commitment to the concept of atheism goes.)

latebloomer: someone's been drinking my youth! (latebloomer), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:30 (twenty years ago)

do you really encounter that many people like this

Can someone explain Ayn Rand to me?!

latebloomer: someone's been drinking my youth! (latebloomer), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:32 (twenty years ago)

I never read her. I hear things that make me not want to.
My notion of agnosticism is not perfectly accurate, of course. It's how I always thought of it though—a neither/nor belief system born of caution. Of course that doesn't cover it all, but we all have our half-formed ideas of things, our incomplete pictures that are maybe worse than no picture, and that's what excellent forums like this are for, for fine tuning our blunt instruments. I had a hard time holding back—not lashing out—when I was referred to as "exhibit A," and had to remind myself to remain analytical. It would help if we could actually discuss things rather than mouth-off, but being a hot-head is fun, I guess. Especially when it comes to these sort of topics. Dunderheads abound, and sometimes I am one of them.
SORRY ALL YOU NOT-WUSSY AGNOSTICS!!!

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:46 (twenty years ago)

personally i distrust atheists. i find them to be terminally materialistic.

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 8 April 2006 19:56 (twenty years ago)

Vahid, we're trying not to GENERALIZE here! Do all the atheists on the thread now need to prove their lack of materialism?
I BUY ALL MY CLOTHES FROM THE THRIFT SHOP, AND NOT A WHOLE LOT OF THEM.
I BUY FEWER USED BOOKS THAN SOME PEOPLE.
MY CAR IS ALL DENTED.
THE SWEATER I'M WEARING HAS HOLES.
I FEND OFF ALL YOUR ACCUSATIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BLAH BLAH BLAH!!!!!!!!!!

Doesn't the pope like, wear fancy robes? Terminally?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Don't people mistrust atheism for the same reason they mistrust gay marriage? Because they're afraid they'll get sucked in!
Their own faith/sexuality whatever is so anemic, all it takes is one little puff of wind and it's like the little pig's straw house. Poof, you're a poofter. Shazam! THERE IS NO GOD and you're going to NONEXISTENCE!!!!!!
Cue the howling wind and black void of nothingness.
No, not even that.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:17 (twenty years ago)

that's not the sort of materialism i meant.

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:28 (twenty years ago)

What kind did you mean?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:35 (twenty years ago)

http://www.island-of-freedom.com/HOBBES.GIF
hi dere

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:40 (twenty years ago)


sit down bitch

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:49 (twenty years ago)

(speaking to T H)

vahid (vahid), Saturday, 8 April 2006 20:51 (twenty years ago)

Who is that other guy?
Sorry I veered from sober discourse up above. Very difficult to avoid blanket statements or grandstanding, it seems.
Still waiting to find out what kind of materialism is endemic among atheists, so I can start working on myself.
Egotism? Uh, yeah, a little bit I guess. Is that a kind of materialism, the ego being a thing, sort of?

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Saturday, 8 April 2006 21:03 (twenty years ago)

I consider myself an agnostic in the sense that the natural, physical world is the knowable world and such fooferaw as "God" "Souls" and basically anything else held to be undetectable and unmeasurable yet somehow real and is pretty fucking unimportant and certainly unknowable/unprovable.

If this makes me a milquetoast who wishes I had Madelyn Murray O'Hare's clanking brass balls, so be it.

Austin Still (Austin, Still), Saturday, 8 April 2006 21:22 (twenty years ago)

Again, you don't have to prove anything, and there is no "panel of judges." You merely have to say, "I can do X under controlled conditions," with X being a specific claim of paranormal ability, then you just, you know, do X. If you actually can do it, you win.

You do know what "controlled conditions" means, right?

Not likely. The guy already said he sells a DVD that explain my "routine." He hasn't responded to my follow up email about performing under any temperature with my hands in my lap. I'd say those are controlled conditions, no?

Just so's you know, Tuesday, 11 April 2006 23:13 (twenty years ago)

Oh, I agree, those would be pretty controlled. Frankly, I hope they take you up on it.

phil d. (Phil D.), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 23:17 (twenty years ago)

How does it work? Who fronts the money? Where do they do the tests?

Just so's you know, Tuesday, 11 April 2006 23:29 (twenty years ago)

Dude, get one (1) FAQ.

phil d. (Phil D.), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 23:32 (twenty years ago)

"Edgell believes a fear of moral decline and resulting social disorder is behind the findings. “Americans believe they share more than rules and procedures with their fellow citizens—they share an understanding of right and wrong,” she said. “Our findings seem to rest on a view of atheists as self-interested individuals who are not concerned with the common good.”

What could be done to correct that problem? Surely something better than seeing a representative of International Humanist and Ethical Union or American Atheists on talk shows.

4856858, Wednesday, 12 April 2006 02:53 (twenty years ago)

THE ANSWER IS OF COURSE GUNS!

948u3727u4r090920298`, Wednesday, 12 April 2006 16:17 (twenty years ago)

Casuistry: ah, okay, I thought you were making out that we had more of a disagreement than we do. Although I'm still not willing to concede that it is the same as 0%. But then, I'm willing to accept the possibility of stupidly metaphysically extravangant ideas, just because we can't absolutely prove otherwise (yes, it is possible I am the only consciousness in the world, yes, it is possible that things unperceived disappear out of existence and only similarly identical things take their place later, yes yes yes). They don't really bother me as long as they don't affect my day to day operations - which is part of the reason I hate religion, as it does affect my operative world, constantly and negatively.

Also, atheist morality has so much more of a higher-ground argument to it than religious morality: it is based on altruism, responsibility and respect rather than punishment or reward.

emil.y (emil.y), Wednesday, 12 April 2006 16:35 (twenty years ago)

Gah, typos. Jeebus.

emil.y (emil.y), Wednesday, 12 April 2006 16:36 (twenty years ago)

nine years pass...

Honestly I don't know which has been worse since Paris, all the right wing bullshit, feel good "this will restore your faith in humanity" bullshit or smug atheists. I just had to point out um yeah Stalin & Mao bro when it was suggested that atheists aren't capable of the evil acts caused by religion

Amira, Queen of Creativity (upper mississippi sh@kedown), Saturday, 21 November 2015 13:57 (ten years ago)

Atheist or not evil acts are usually motivated by the desire to gain more power/control. Religion is a tool, politics is a tool, violence is a tool... whatever combination gains more influence.

Evan, Saturday, 21 November 2015 14:32 (ten years ago)

what are some other tools?

brimstead, Saturday, 21 November 2015 21:00 (ten years ago)

maybe we can start a thread

brimstead, Saturday, 21 November 2015 21:00 (ten years ago)

open goal there

brimstead, Saturday, 21 November 2015 21:00 (ten years ago)

I only meant they're tools in that context.

Evan, Saturday, 21 November 2015 23:53 (ten years ago)

Casually throwing violence in there, good work

brimstead, Saturday, 21 November 2015 23:56 (ten years ago)

Brimstead: "violence not a tool for power/control" hmm interesting, good work, etc

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 November 2015 00:32 (ten years ago)

Evan's post otm

Treeship, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:19 (ten years ago)

Mostly

Treeship, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:21 (ten years ago)

ISIS is a political organization who obviously want to gain more power and control, but for individual ISIS suicide bombers, religion is the final motivating factor. There is no end outside of glorifying Allah for these people, it seems

Treeship, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:22 (ten years ago)

Brimstead: "violence not a tool for power/control" hmm interesting, good work, etc

― MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Saturday, November 21, 2015 4:32 PM (58 minutes ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

brimstead casts "context" spell

brimstead, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:31 (ten years ago)

sorry, brimstead casts "chaos orb"

brimstead, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:37 (ten years ago)

to assist the intellect-impaired darraughmac, i was just pointing out that there are MANY other things one could substitute into that sentence besides violence

brimstead, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:38 (ten years ago)

i don't think he did that to equate religion with violence. the idea was that coercion takes many forms. Violence is probably the most basic form

Treeship, Sunday, 22 November 2015 01:55 (ten years ago)

Just to add on to what Evan said, for what I'd call "believing" violent groups -- whether it be religion or some other ideology -- I think there's often a substantial overlap between belief and recognition of the usefulness of the ideology in gaining power. Reading The Looming Tower now and it identifies a sort of confluence of people feeling humiliated by the west with a sense that they had turned away from "true Islam," and Qutb and Zawahiri and the figures the book discusses are among the ideological ancestors of ISIS, so I think it's this combination of "genuine" religious belief with recognition of the power of a religious ideology that claims to have the one true answer, bolstered by a sense that Islam is the opposite of the west and therefore the ideology to adopt in fighting the west.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Sunday, 22 November 2015 03:19 (ten years ago)

I also think most of the atheist ideologies that are responsible for atrocities take on a kind of quasi-religious fervor, or at least they have the same sort of absolutist, redemptive bent.

on entre O.K. on sort K.O. (man alive), Sunday, 22 November 2015 03:30 (ten years ago)

some videos i was forwarded recently by my atheist friend

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kyfuv46z5pM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_hS-JXoTMk

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 04:42 (ten years ago)

Yes, I was not equating religion and violence. I was saying they're both elements taken advantage of in different degrees by those seeking control/power.

Evan, Sunday, 22 November 2015 04:55 (ten years ago)

Adam you keep bringing up this particular atheist friend- I wouldn't say this person is the ideal representative for the majority of atheists!

Evan, Sunday, 22 November 2015 04:59 (ten years ago)

then don't! i haven't.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 05:37 (ten years ago)

you are otm in that first post btw

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 05:38 (ten years ago)

To assist the personality-impaired brumstead, I was suggesting that a consistent approach of terse sarcastic repetition of another person's point just makes you look like a cunt.

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 November 2015 13:36 (ten years ago)

Something to watch ;-)

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 November 2015 13:37 (ten years ago)

lol thanks i will take that into consideration if i ever give a shit what u think of me

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 16:50 (ten years ago)

but thanks for helping me realize the title of this thread asshole.

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 16:58 (ten years ago)

i didnt wander in here and call u a cunt so fuck off

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 16:59 (ten years ago)

something to watch ;-)

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:00 (ten years ago)

tips fedoraa

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:00 (ten years ago)

uh...

Number None, Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:00 (ten years ago)

Having trouble keeping the assholes apart

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:01 (ten years ago)

You illiterate moron.
Xxp

pandemic, Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:14 (ten years ago)

literacy-impaired

noe love derp wev (wins), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:16 (ten years ago)

Lol ur alright bruneau if u read the post again it was aimed elsewhere

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:18 (ten years ago)

Cool it's an situation

Hammer Smashed Bagels, Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:18 (ten years ago)

no place for persecution complexes in this thread

when's international me day? (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:27 (ten years ago)

Lol

Treeship, Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:40 (ten years ago)

lol i love u all

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:46 (ten years ago)

oh i feel like an idiot

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 17:49 (ten years ago)

Fwiw I've always appreciated yr level headedness itt!

MONKEY had been BUMMED by the GHOST of the late prancing paedophile (darraghmac), Sunday, 22 November 2015 18:07 (ten years ago)

no place for persecution complexes in this thread

― when's international me day? (Noodle Vague), Sunday, November 22, 2015 10:27 AM (2 hours ago) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

dying

mattresslessness, Sunday, 22 November 2015 20:19 (ten years ago)

yall my rib

AdamVania (Adam Bruneau), Sunday, 22 November 2015 20:21 (ten years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.