"the devil wears prada"

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
take the fashion-mag part out of it and it's still a pretty apt snapshot of cutthroat nyc office environments. at my first salaried position out of college i got the same "shut up, bottom feeder, and fetch me my lunch" treatment. which i probably deserved. entry-level assistant jobs are a pestilence upon new york city. don't even get me started on interns.

this movie was ok. but all the scenes outside the magazine and its sphere were painfully bad (the romantic interests and friends especially). the friends looked and acted like they were plucked from an infomercial.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:01 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, black chick scolding her at art opening(?)was soooooo bad. I know this was based on a novel, but how much better would this flick be if Andie went over to the dark side at the end. Also, music cues were also mostly terrible. Yeah, we're focusing on "cutting edge" fashion playing tunes from 5-10-15(!) years ago.

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:09 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the same thing about the music cues.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:10 (nineteen years ago)

SPOILER

i'm confused about what happens at the end -- does she take the new job or does she go off with her bf to boston? it seems like she takes the job, but that leaves the bf situation awkwardly unresolved.

END SPOILER

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:14 (nineteen years ago)

It was less bitchy than I expected (or wanted).

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

The line where Hathaway talks about not being beautiful, thin, glamorous, etc. = roffles.

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:15 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, did i miss the memo about her being fat and ugly?

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:17 (nineteen years ago)

egads, size 6!!

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:19 (nineteen years ago)

i did like the line where tucci calls her "six."

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:19 (nineteen years ago)

more often than not, i find streep & tucci somewhat annoying & "actorly" but here they did well, esp. streep. and hathaway, tho no powerhouse, is ultimately the one who makes this watchable (streep dominates but has relatively small amount of screen time)

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:22 (nineteen years ago)

and the scene where streep gives hathaway the lecture about "cerulean blue" trickling down from couture into cheap sweaters at the mall -- totally OTM. when you buy clothes, you're buying fashion, no matter how tenth-generation it might be.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:24 (nineteen years ago)

streep should never play anything other than rich bitches.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

when you buy clothes, you're buying fashion, no matter how tenth-generation it might be.

who cares

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:26 (nineteen years ago)

some people care!

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:27 (nineteen years ago)

why

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

yeah, that scene re: cerulean blue was good, but the argument isn't likely to convince non-believers about the importance of fashion

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:28 (nineteen years ago)

timmy tannin the way you phrase that makes it sound like fashion really is important

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:29 (nineteen years ago)

can't you be stylish and save the world at the same time? angelina does it.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

oh sorry i didn't realize angelina did it now if you'll excuse me i've got to go like fashion now suddenly

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:31 (nineteen years ago)

why are you even on this thread, dude

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:32 (nineteen years ago)

i saw the film just like you did and i have opinions regarding the film just like you do jacques lu c on t. my opinion just happens to be that the movie is a bunch of dogshit moron crapola for idiots and fashion is stupid jerkoff diarrhea barf.

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:34 (nineteen years ago)

"She's out of your league".

¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ¨ˆ (chaki), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:35 (nineteen years ago)

why did you even see the film, dude

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

here is the entire movie

SPOILER ALERT, BE CAREFUL EVERYONE SPOILERS LIE WITHIN THIS NEXT PARA-GRAPH

hey look fashion fashion fashion check it out fashion skinny women fancy things money money money money money money money money sex sex sex sex sex sex sex sex look look look look look look, uh oh it is actually a bad thing

OKAY THE SPOILER HAS FINISHED NOW, YOU ARE SAFE TO READ THIS PARTICULAR SENTENCE AND WHATEVER LIES AFTERWARD IT

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:36 (nineteen years ago)

you sound like a fun person, ath.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:39 (nineteen years ago)

ok but i don't really see what that has to do with this movie

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:40 (nineteen years ago)

if you're so deeply offended by everything this movie is about why did you go see it? were you dragged by a GURL?

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:42 (nineteen years ago)

ewwwww, gurls are stinky!!

timmy tannin (pompous), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

let's just say, for the sake of argument, jacques lu c on t, that i'm frankie muniz from the hit tv series malcolm in the middle and i was invited to the hollywood premier

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:43 (nineteen years ago)

HOLLYWOOD IS SO SHALLOW

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:44 (nineteen years ago)

now can we actually talk about the movie? surely there are other "fashion is stupid" threads on this board.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

ok i guess my chief complaint with the film was that its critique on the materialistic world of fashion journalism would have been that much more effective had the songs featured on the soundtrack been more contemporary by a minimum of three (3) years

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:47 (nineteen years ago)

and i agree. but the whole movie feels like a throwback to a few years ago, like post 9/11 but pre cancellation of sex and the city.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:50 (nineteen years ago)

dogshit moron crapola for idiots

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:51 (nineteen years ago)

i'm not even so sure it's a "critique" of fashion journalism. it comes off like a breathless tribute, and there are things about hathaway's character that are meant to be chuckled at (like her believing that anybody gives a shit that she was editor-in-chief of her school paper).

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:53 (nineteen years ago)

yeah i also was not quite exactly sure if that's what it was (a "critque") or not but i'll have you know that you can rest assured i spent a good deal of time thinking about whether or not it was and i've got a pretty good feeling that i'm about to come to a decision on this topic eventually sometime within the near future

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 02:59 (nineteen years ago)

and i mean, why, in this day and age, amidst all this political turmoil, in this tumultuous, politically-charged world in which we live and the turmoil which accompanies it, shouldn't we take a minute to pay tribute to fashion journalism by watching a movie regarding it? i mean, what, exactly, is a reason to not do this?

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:02 (nineteen years ago)

i saw the road to guantanamo a week ago. this was funnier.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:05 (nineteen years ago)

i, for one, am just glad to know that fashion has finally been paid tribute to (unless, of course, it has been "critiqued," in which case i'm not entirely sure how to feel about that)

ath (ath), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:09 (nineteen years ago)

I hate fashion and yet I feel like watching this movie just to spite ath.

polyphonic (polyphonic), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:15 (nineteen years ago)

i thought the movie was supposed to be funny?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:16 (nineteen years ago)

it's a lighthearted romp

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:23 (nineteen years ago)

the third-best comedy of the middle of the summer! -leonard maltin

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:24 (nineteen years ago)

Hathaway is a very strange actress. She's so drama club-y (it's the facial expressions and the way she changes her voice), and serious about the craft only in the way that drama club people are. I'm still not sure if her role in Havoc was the worst performance I've ever seen, or actually pretty good.

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:39 (nineteen years ago)

The sections that were basically fashion-porn (and all the touching romantic BS) were kind of meh, but I did like the rest of it.

milo z (mlp), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:40 (nineteen years ago)

her name reminds me of ann hampton callaway.

http://www.corporateartists.com/images/anncalloway.jpg

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 03:51 (nineteen years ago)

ath, fashion is important because we all wear clothes all the time and somebody had to fucking design them and that person thought long and hard about how to do it. i really dislike how certain parts of western culture maintain this absurd hatred of appearance, dividing objects of evaluation into 'surface' and 'inner' categories and automatically rejecting the former when the latter is largely incommunicable. formalism is valuable, too!

note that i haven't seen the movie, and i probably won't because i've heard from several sources how poor a grasp of fashion design it has.

lf (lfam), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 04:04 (nineteen years ago)

uh

i hope that's coherent.

lf (lfam), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 04:05 (nineteen years ago)

the movie doesn't talk about "fashion design" very much though... it focuses more on what goes into putting together a magazine. which is always interesting to see in movies (for me, anyway).

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 04:09 (nineteen years ago)

and i liked that hathaway was the only person at runway not employed there out of sheer love and awe of the trade, but her motive for stepping on her co-worker's toes was that if she did it she'd be able to last out the year and perhaps get a good reference out of it. she never gave the impression that she was growing to love her job, just that she was proud of herself for doing it well. that part's realistic enough.

jacques lu c on t (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 4 July 2006 04:20 (nineteen years ago)

more often than not, i find streep & tucci somewhat annoying & "actorly" but here they did well, esp. streep.

This might be my favorite Stanley Tucci performance. That moment, having champagne with Anne Hathaway, when he can't contain his enthusiasm over the possibility that he might leave Miranda's clutches, is the best thing he's ever done.

No one's singled out Emily Post's acidulous coworker, though.

In fact, Tucci, Streep, and Post give three of the best performances I've seen this year (Anne Hathaway and the terrible grunge-lite boyfriend get hopeless roles, but Hathaway is turning into a rather smart actress, and she always managed to give a line an unusual spin).

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 8 July 2006 20:41 (nineteen years ago)

taco OTM about the movie's unhysteric view of Miranda. David Denby got this one right: "This has to be the most devastating boss-lady performance in the history of cinema. By comparison, Faye Dunaway’s hysterics in “Network” come off as amusing freak-outs, and Sigourney Weaver in “Working Girl” is a coarse, leather-lunged shouter."

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Saturday, 8 July 2006 20:52 (nineteen years ago)

is stanley tucci actually gay?

phil-two (phil-two), Sunday, 9 July 2006 02:56 (nineteen years ago)

HATHAWAY UPSET WITH TUCCI'S BREAST OBSESSION

Actor STANLEY TUCCI couldn't keep his hands off co-star ANNE HATHAWAY on the set of new fashion comedy THE DEVIL WEARS PRADA - because he was fascinated with her breasts.
The actress reveals she had to eventually rebuke her co-star
when he kept elbowing her in the chest, because she felt it was inappropriate, and it hurt.
She explains, "There was this one day where he kept elbowing me in the breast. He wasn't doing it to be like a dirty old man, but if we were doing a scene or I was just crossing to get to my mark (on the set) he would just smack me in my boob and elbow me.
"If you're a girl you know that hurts. So, after about the fourth time, I finally turned to him and said, 'Stanley can you please stay away from my t**s?' "Stanley got really flustered and he said, 'What do you expect, you're flinging those melons around like it's harvest season!'"

Cor-Ray (chaki), Sunday, 9 July 2006 20:02 (nineteen years ago)

HI I READ DEFAMER TOO

Jimmy Mod: NOIZE BOARD GRIL COMPARISON ANALYST (The Famous Jimmy Mod), Sunday, 9 July 2006 20:14 (nineteen years ago)

hi i read associated press 2

Cor-Ray (chaki), Sunday, 9 July 2006 20:34 (nineteen years ago)

haha that story is old news already

grandfathered in (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:04 (nineteen years ago)

stanley tucci actually gay?

yess. i saw him with the bf at circle in the square.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

that sounds like a gay club but it's a theatre.

poortheatre (poortheatre), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:06 (nineteen years ago)

didn't he used to date Edie Falco?

horseshoe (horseshoe), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)

he's married

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:39 (nineteen years ago)

i hope he remembers to take off his ring when he goes out cruising!

grandfathered in (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:41 (nineteen years ago)

he denies knowing who Andre Leon Talley is - he must be gay

gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 9 July 2006 22:47 (nineteen years ago)

two weeks pass...
OK, so I agree that Jarlsberg is the perfect cheese for grilled cheese, but some of her outfits have got to go. The necklaces, off the shoulder sweater, and 19th C. Dickensian cap are a prime example of what you might expect to see on Sex and the City but not on a protege of Miranda Priestley who I doubt would have deigned to carry a Prada bag if she didn't have to put up with her creator's lack of skill in coming up with a more suitable title. The problem is clutter. Clutter without a point, ya know? (I believe in fashion's frivolity and its absolutes.)

youn (youn), Monday, 24 July 2006 22:08 (nineteen years ago)

but the title is what MADE the book!

phil-two (phil-two), Monday, 24 July 2006 23:04 (nineteen years ago)

two years pass...

cute movie

a mountain climber who plays an electric guitar (gabbneb), Friday, 9 January 2009 01:11 (seventeen years ago)

It was terrible. I like the combative Ath above, and I hated the ghastly nasty aggressive Streep speech about how fashion is actually important for all of us. Thank god this pile of bs is all in the longago past now.

the pinefox, Friday, 9 January 2009 01:19 (seventeen years ago)

do you dress well?

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Friday, 9 January 2009 01:24 (seventeen years ago)

ghastly, nasty, aggressive, Streep, speech

a mountain climber who plays an electric guitar (gabbneb), Friday, 9 January 2009 01:35 (seventeen years ago)

two weeks pass...

this is fun but kind of... self-parodic. the scene where they queer-eye hathaway and it's like the end of 'grease' or some shit. it's like, really? the ultimate hot girl before/hot girl after bit.

eligible bachelor, million dollar boat (Brohan Hari), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:25 (seventeen years ago)

yeah it's totally disney. but she was kind of perfect in the part.

Surmounter, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:28 (seventeen years ago)

she and emily blunt are certainly keeping me watching tbh.

eligible bachelor, million dollar boat (Brohan Hari), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:31 (seventeen years ago)

so jealous of you watching this right now! i just love how hathaway's eyes are so big and innocent, she looks like a beautiful deer

Surmounter, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:32 (seventeen years ago)

oh i thought this was about the horrible band. i have friends who love them and it makes me sad

k3vin k., Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:36 (seventeen years ago)

great movie

max, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:38 (seventeen years ago)

boy that adam grenier is some actor.

eligible bachelor, million dollar boat (Brohan Hari), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:41 (seventeen years ago)

lol adrian. he's all look, i'm a cute guy, see??

Surmounter, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:42 (seventeen years ago)

isn't he?

double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:48 (seventeen years ago)

i've seen my first 2 hathaway movies in the last month. she can act, rite?

double bird strike (gabbneb), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:49 (seventeen years ago)

ya he totally is. he lives in my hood. i think she's a pretty awesome actress! seems really comfortable onscreen.

Surmounter, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 22:51 (seventeen years ago)

the writer in this is a fucking dick and he looks like a tweaker also.

eligible bachelor, million dollar boat (Brohan Hari), Wednesday, 28 January 2009 23:08 (seventeen years ago)

he's actually a former tv psyhchic

It was terrible. I like the combative Ath above, and I hated the ghastly nasty aggressive Streep speech about how fashion is actually important for all of us. Thank god this pile of bs is all in the longago past now.

lol 4 lyfe

Lamp, Wednesday, 28 January 2009 23:23 (seventeen years ago)

seventeen years pass...

Will absolutely see the sequel, out soon; guaranteed to be the worst-dressed person in the theatre.

clemenza, Thursday, 12 March 2026 19:45 (two months ago)

one month passes...

shocked no revive!

boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 May 2026 15:15 (two weeks ago)

Anyway, as many highs and lows as the first. Streep, Tucci, and Blunt are terrific, Hathaway less so -- she plays Andy like Andy and Hathaway haven't learned a thing about the world and acting, respectively, in 20 years.

boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 May 2026 15:16 (two weeks ago)

rewatched the first one this week, I had forgotten everything about it other than the night scene in Paris for some reason. Will watch this this weekend.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Wednesday, 6 May 2026 15:40 (two weeks ago)

It was terrible. I like the combative Ath above, and I hated the ghastly nasty aggressive Streep speech about how fashion is actually important for all of us. Thank god this pile of bs is all in the longago past now.

― the pinefox, Thursday, January 8, 2009

amazing how ghastly posts like this weren't flagged in 2009

boners for bombs (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Wednesday, 6 May 2026 16:08 (two weeks ago)

I can't recall if 2009 was in the FP or SB era. Thank god this is all in the long ago past now.

more difficult than I look (Aimless), Wednesday, 6 May 2026 17:17 (two weeks ago)

I enjoyed this. Correct, not as good as the first one, but not a huge dip in quality. I'm an unapologetic Hathaway fan and I thought she was great in it.

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Sunday, 10 May 2026 06:01 (one week ago)

i loved justin theroux's hammy seth rogen-esque character

My homies buttthole surfers' record sounds like a f (Western® with Bacon Flavor), Wednesday, 13 May 2026 07:35 (one week ago)

my basic tier for this - did the tucci deliver?

by my grade, a smashing sucksess!

My homies buttthole surfers' record sounds like a f (Western® with Bacon Flavor), Wednesday, 13 May 2026 07:37 (one week ago)

This is just very fucking bad isn’t it? I’m not sure I even got up to whelmed at any point, just very derivative and tired, I swear to God I groaned out loud when I realised Andy is wearing a torn up version of the CERULEAN BLUE SWEATER HAHA ISN’T IT FUNNY IT’S A REFERENCE JUST FOR YOU EXCEPT NO IT ISN’T IT’S A METAPHOR FOR THE WHOLE SORRY SLOPFEST WALKING AROUND IN THE BONES OF THE SUPERIOR ORIGINAL HAHA FUCK OFF

hat stays on (gyac), Thursday, 14 May 2026 21:23 (one week ago)

xp I did not even realize that was Justin Theroux

I? not I! He! He! HIM! (akm), Thursday, 14 May 2026 22:12 (one week ago)

I loved how Theroux actually looked sort of repellent for the first time ever… and then I found out he had work done & that is his face now? Lol sob. (I think it’s the same thing that happened to Julian McMahon)

anyway this was ok?
It wasn’t good. If anything it’s a pretty bummertown summation of the state of magazine publishing … but like, why.
it wasn’t very fun or funny or fashiony & the characters were so sanded down from their original iterations

A thin gruel that I guess was edible & inoffensive

werewolves of laudanum (VegemiteGrrl), Friday, 15 May 2026 23:15 (one week ago)

I've been wanting to see this since it opened, but every day I check the seating at the London Cineplex and it's almost full, even in the early afternoon. I'd rather wait till audiences thin out.

clemenza, Saturday, 16 May 2026 00:08 (one week ago)

But in Stratford this afternoon, a near-empty theatre (no reclining seats, though)...Glad I saw it. Biggest complaint for me was two guys I've liked a lot in the past: B.J. Ryan in The Office and Justin Theroux in The Leftovers. The first seemed miscast, the second just bad. (Guessing that's the third Elon Musk I've seen at the movies--getting tiresome, and A.I. as an existential threat will likely be another exhausted movie topic before long.) All the principals were fine, and I was--it's true--even moved by a couple of scenes. (Streep/Tucci's moment especially.) The campiest line in the film was the contractor complimenting Anne Hathaway on her four-part piece on the federal reserve; I almost laughed out loud. I evidently missed Rory Mcllroy.

clemenza, Sunday, 17 May 2026 23:16 (six days ago)

B.J. Ryan in The Office

...who once had back-to-back 30-save seasons but, as far as I know, never appeared in The Office. That would be B.J. Novak.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2026 05:25 (five days ago)

(For the sake of symmetry, wish I'd also said Justin Morneau in The Leftovers.)

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2026 05:26 (five days ago)

But in Stratford this afternoon, a near-empty theatre (no reclining seats, though)...Glad I saw it. Biggest complaint for me was two guys I've liked a lot in the past: B.J. Ryan in The Office and Justin Theroux in The Leftovers. The first seemed miscast, the second just bad. (Guessing that's the third Elon Musk I've seen at the movies--getting tiresome, and A.I. as an existential threat will likely be another exhausted movie topic before long.) All the principals were fine, and I was--it's true--even moved by a couple of scenes. (Streep/Tucci's moment especially.) The campiest line in the film was the contractor complimenting Anne Hathaway on her four-part piece on the federal reserve; I almost laughed out loud. I evidently missed Rory Mcllroy.

― clemenza, Sunday, May 17, 2026 7:16 PM (yesterday) bookmarkflaglink

i would watch any DWP spinoff if all i was promised was that it has the Tucci's and the Theroux's characters

My homies buttthole surfers' record sounds like a f (Western® with Bacon Flavor), Monday, 18 May 2026 06:41 (five days ago)

Forgot to mention something I really liked: Miranda's assistant sitting next to her in staff meetings and making sure she doesn't say anything impolitic. As presented in the film, literally a Miranda whisperer.

clemenza, Monday, 18 May 2026 14:54 (five days ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.