Oh yeah, no posts dated after this one are eligible.
Don't want anyone specifically trying to make it into
the hall of fame.
1.
[tuomas-underwear-ridingcrop.jpg]
Allow me to be frank at the commencement. You will not like me. The gentlemen will be envious and the ladies will be repelled. You will not like me now and you will like me a good deal less as we go on. Ladies, an announcement: I am up for it, all the time. That is not a boast or an opinion, it is bone hard medical fact. I put it round you know. And you will watch me putting it round and sigh for it. Don't. It is a deal of trouble for you and you are better off watching and drawing your conclusions from a distance than you would be if I got my tarse up your petticoats. Gentlemen. Do not despair, I am up for that as well. And the same warning applies. Still your cheesy erections till I have had my say. But later when you shag - and later you will shag, I shall expect it of you and I will know if you have let me down - I wish you to shag with my homuncular image rattling in your gonads. Feel how it was for me, how it is for me and ponder. 'Was that shudder the same shudder he sensed? Did he know something more profound? Or is there some wall of wretchedness that we all batter with our heads at that shining, livelong moment. That is it. That is my prologue, nothing in rhyme, no protestations of modesty, you were not expecting that I hope. I am John Wilmot, Second Earl of Rochester and I do not want you to like me.
-- Zwan (anthonyisrigh...), July 29th, 2006.
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Saturday, 26 August 2006 01:35 (nineteen years ago)
Yes,It was a test,This is why:Upon being abused over the last few days, a day after 'joining' There was *absolutely* too MUCH insulting and questioning of gender that was more *childish* than anything.
Being that this is the net, You could POSSIBLY question ALOT of things,the persons gender, their race, their age, their morals, etc.etc. But then again, We do not expect people to be *liars* on a board,because then *everybody* can and may be a LIAR.Fair enough.
I was being attacked over my questions in the SEX category, Now, what the fuck qualifies as a 'good' sex question as oppose to a 'bad' one?
I was merely being honest, and besides my question just being more or less a very descriptive question, I didn't expect it to be a *problem* What sex question 'isn't' going to be somewhat intimate, descriptive or SEXUAL for fuck sake......
I found out that the Dick man (RJG) is just your typical nob, a bell end, a prick,a cheesey helmet, a bastard, a jerk, a disrespectful common idiot,a fuckwit,that You can and will find on most boards or chat rooms...and as we found out in *here* as well.When my gender was questioned,At first, I was trying to be as polite as possible, I even gave out my Yahoo! username for anyone to send me an IM to hear my voice on mic,if they wanted to.But as no one bothered to take me on my offer,and things got a little bit out of touch here, especially if in the *hair* CATEGORY (not a forum, not a 'hair' board, but a *category* no less), I was going to be to replied with something like "No 28 inch waist size man would ever fuck you..blah...blah" by the DICK headed twat-face AKA 'RJG'...that was uncalled for, maybe even so far as hostile of him to be attacking me when I was just posting my update on here about my hair,to the kind examples of human-beings who were kind enough to help me sort out that issue,There was no reason for that jerk to carry on his selfish idiotic tyrades to hassle me.Anywhere else on my other threads I was encountering this maniac AKA 'RJG' with his nonstop constant assaults,and uncalled for replies of idiodicy, mind You, they were not *civilized* OPINIONS nor something of that nature for anyone to consider like 'everyone has their own opinion, or choice or preference' this was an all in all attack of the internet kind on me, and of course, that just isn't fair (not like if LIFE is fair, cause it ISN'T)but however old this DICK is, And I bet you he is somewhere between 20-30, he certainly DOESN'T act like it.Yeah, I know many of You are going to say something like "But You went at him too" and Yes, I have, and I have done it on this message too, but that is AFTER the fact, after about 3 days of his constant crap, and to be honest, where am I wrong on calling him what he really is? (jerk, bastard, idiot, etc)The fact that Martin Skidmore at first questioned him about his attack on me, but then totally did a 180 turn, is just fine,because as soon as I gave RJG my 2 cents about what I really think about him,is ALL that really matters,It doesn't matter what this 'Skidmore' thinks of me, simply because I gave RJG a verbal lashing, after ALL the abuse I was put through by him? He deserved it,case closed.
Martin,If You expected me to stand idly by, You thought *wrong*....There are about 4 other threads of his nonsense before I gave him that one. Think about it.
Anyways, I am glad some people didn't want to see me go,even though I wasn't going to..But it was nice reading everyones support, I even got one e-mail asking me to reconsider,and it was a very nice gesture.Thankyou very much.
As for Kate, If you read along that thread, where you thought I 'had a go at You' You would understand why, and You did go a bit beside the point of the original question,and I am sure You can understand that.
I never had a problem as far as opinions go, it's the repetitive insults and name calling that is a bit far off the integrity of this whole site, I am sure many of You can agree,What is the point in asking questions, No question is a bad question, as it were; a question ends with a '?' right? It's just bad sportsmanship for someone to start hasseling someone over their gender of all things? Jesus Christ, then what? their eye colour? or better yet, the brand of toilet paper they use?
I came in here being nice and I intend to be nice,and be this an 'internet' board or not (where many people think it's 'okay' to be abusive and what not)I didn't come on here with any intention but just that of participating and looking foward to having some of my own questions answered, and I really don't think that is such a hard thing to understand, Is it?
So as for RJG-As much as I would of liked to have been your 'friend' You made it so that it wasn't possible for me to think but very VERY negatively of You, and for everyone else out there who likes this poor excuse of a human;You just need to understand and accept it.
It was never my intention,but RJG is just a sad jerk.
Alright.....Let's hear those replies now!
-- becky lucas (beckylovesni...), January 28th, 2003.
― Curt1s St3ph3ns, Sunday, 27 August 2006 04:07 (nineteen years ago)