― Ghost Roger (Roger Fidelity), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:03 (eighteen years ago)
― I Tried to Use My Cock as a Bong (noodle vague), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Brigadier Lethbridge-Pfunkboy (Kerr), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:29 (eighteen years ago)
― I Tried to Use My Cock as a Bong (noodle vague), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:30 (eighteen years ago)
He started his career by writing jokes for Yakov Smirnoff.
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:36 (eighteen years ago)
― and what (ooo), Sunday, 11 February 2007 00:39 (eighteen years ago)
YAKOV SMIRNOFF: Hey, kid, I don't do Russian jokes for last ten years. Now I do jokes about relationships and things I observe.
It's not better than now, guys!
― mark grout (mark grout), Sunday, 11 February 2007 08:44 (eighteen years ago)
Good god, NO ONE would claim that. For the last five or six or seven years, yes.
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 08:47 (eighteen years ago)
Agreed.
― polyphonic (polyphonic), Sunday, 11 February 2007 08:49 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 08:58 (eighteen years ago)
Not me though. Actually, the more i watch the newer, wackier ones the more i see they're pretty good in their own fucked up way.
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Sunday, 11 February 2007 08:59 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:08 (eighteen years ago)
― A B C (sparklecock), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:19 (eighteen years ago)
xp
― kingfishy (kingfish 2.0), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:20 (eighteen years ago)
You rang?
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:38 (eighteen years ago)
Thanks a lot, prick.
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:43 (eighteen years ago)
― I Tried to Use My Cock as a Bong (noodle vague), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 09:54 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)
Futurama doesn't come into this at all, using it was a total straw robot, my bias notwithstanding.
As to the topic at hand, to be honest I'm not really jonesing for the movie. The trailer hasn't gotten my interest. I'm way WAY more interested in the new Futurama movies/shows up for '08.
xpost
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:01 (eighteen years ago)
But don't ask me, I'm just a nerdy Bab5 lover.
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:02 (eighteen years ago)
― I Tried to Use My Cock as a Bong (noodle vague), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:03 (eighteen years ago)
I'm totally peeing myself in anticipation for it, but I would =)
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:05 (eighteen years ago)
― I Tried to Use My Cock as a Bong (noodle vague), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:06 (eighteen years ago)
That was a good show. TEN YEARS AGO.
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:07 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 10:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Sunday, 11 February 2007 11:02 (eighteen years ago)
this helps me remember the good times. and forget series 8 thru...whatever the hell they're up to now.
― pisces (piscesx), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
― vita susicivus (blueski), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:22 (eighteen years ago)
― Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)
― pisces (piscesx), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:29 (eighteen years ago)
btw, simpsons movie's gonna suuuuuuuuuuuck. i hope the whole plot is frank grimes-based.
― GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:35 (eighteen years ago)
I was contemplating whether to see norbit today. I think I'll just lounge around the house and jab toothpicks under my fingernails instead.
― Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 11 February 2007 13:49 (eighteen years ago)
― GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:22 (eighteen years ago)
― Slumpman (Slump Man), Sunday, 11 February 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Thermo Thinwall (Thermo Thinwall), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)
― So weit wie knock-kneed (kenan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
That's my limit, right there. I don't think I can get along with people who are too lazy or unimaginative to come up with something to do besides watch TV. Not that I hate TV or people who enjoy it (I enjoy a fair bit myself) or even who enjoy things that I think are meritricious crap that is actively making the world worse. But fucking christ, have SOME standards, even if I do disagree with them.
― Candy: tastes like chicken, if chicken was a candy. (Austin, Still), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Zwan (miccio), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
OTM.
― Nathan P1p (hoyanathan), Sunday, 11 February 2007 16:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:28 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:29 (eighteen years ago)
― blueski, Tuesday, 27 February 2007 18:38 (eighteen years ago)
i dunno i was sure this would blow but - albert brooks is the villain! hank scorpio!!!
― and what, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:15 (eighteen years ago)
! Okay, this could be cool.
― Ned Raggett, Wednesday, 13 June 2007 18:17 (eighteen years ago)
well The Simpsons were always, among other things, kind of a rejoinder to cheeseball 80's sitcoms, without making many explicit nods to them.
― Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:48 (eighteen years ago)
has there ever been a Perfect Strangers reference in The Simpsons?
-- blueski, Friday, August 3, 2007 4:19 PM (29 minutes ago) Bookmark Link
Balki/goat/toilet joke or something?????
― Mr. Que, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:49 (eighteen years ago)
Barting Over episode
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:50 (eighteen years ago)
Larry: Balki, why are you dancing in the toilet? Balki: What? You never heard of "Flush Dance"?
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:51 (eighteen years ago)
i swear a goat was involved
― Mr. Que, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:52 (eighteen years ago)
entirely possible - nonetheless, not one of the better episodes
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 August 2007 16:53 (eighteen years ago)
Treehouse of Horror XV:
n a parody of Perfect Strangers, Kang and Kodos are preparing the Simpsons for dinner for their "boss." Bart and Homer are the main course, Lisa is in a soup, and Marge and Maggie are pies. Bart is frying on a skillet, while Homer keeps eating himself. The boss comments on the delicious meal, whereupon his stomach bursts open, liberating Bart, who, in turn, delightfully exclaims "Cool, I'm vomit!" Kang and Kodos get a hyper-galactic promotion. Bart is sad about being an orphan, but he is adopted by Kang and Kodos. The Perfect Strangers theme song then plays over the opening credits.
― Phil D., Friday, 3 August 2007 17:01 (eighteen years ago)
I AM LOOKING FOR MY COZEN LARRY! + Andy Kaufman = Borat (also = me asleep)
-- Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, October 18, 2006 3:11 PM (9 months ago) Bookmark Link
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:03 (eighteen years ago)
well the sense i got from it was that he saw through the formal comedy cliches at work but still thought they were done effectively. i mean i'm not gonna go line for line but you have to admit there are some pretty negative parts in there. me, I just fail to see how this is all just a slightly more explicit/'edgy' version of Latka Gravas/Balki Bartokomous as played by a much less entertaining performer.
-- Alex in Baltimore (Alex in Baltimore), Thursday, November 9, 2006 8:10 PM (8 months ago) Bookmark Link
hooray we agree
― Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
I just fail to see how this is all just a slightly more explicit/'edgy' version of Latka Gravas/Balki Bartokomous as played by a much less entertaining performer.
you're right but... SFW dude.
― s1ocki, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:06 (eighteen years ago)
you misspelled stfu
― and what, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
Was Kang in the movie? I think I saw a voice credit but don't remember any aliens (unless it was in a Where's Waldo crowd scene).
― Jordan, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)
actually he's not right about the much less entertaining performer part. xp
― s1ocki, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:11 (eighteen years ago)
i want to reiterate that this movie reeked btw.
no s1ocki's right, my post was completely safe for work.
― Alex in Baltimore, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:13 (eighteen years ago)
Jordan, Kang & Kodos were originally going to be complaining during the credits but it got cut. They might have been in some other deleted scenes as well.
― Curt1s Stephens, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:17 (eighteen years ago)
slocki pls uniterate
― Jordan, Friday, 3 August 2007 17:24 (eighteen years ago)
I was wondering that too. Maybe he was cut, or maybe he sang in the anthem during the credits?
Anyway I just saw this movie and it was nice. About what I expected. It did show off the limits of the series, though: It's still a sitcom, and sitcoms don't become movies very easily.
― Casuistry, Friday, 3 August 2007 19:26 (eighteen years ago)
(Compare say South Park, which is satire, which can work in that longer format much better.)
― Casuistry, Friday, 3 August 2007 19:27 (eighteen years ago)
jesus it was fucking shit, the more I think about it the more shit it seems. the emotional scenes=crap and unconvincing attempts to return to some time 10 years ago or more, and the gags=awful one liners for as many stock characters as possible.
it was 80 mins long and by 50 mins me and my friends I saw it with were dying to leave.
i don't want this to be true but it is. someone upthread said they pandered to fans but it's exactly opposite; in an effort not to scare off casual viewers and children with arcana and um, wit, everything was flat and cursory and the rhythm was so lazy and sitcomy. Flanders was creepy. There were some good gags, stranded. It all fit together though, felt like a movie I guess. I'm not sad or anything, just kicking myself for not seeing Bourne Supremacy.
― tremendoid, Saturday, 4 August 2007 07:53 (eighteen years ago)
i mean even these days they make episodes (marginally) funnier than this on the fly, how could the time factor not result in something sharper? it seemed like they strained to avoid topicality to such a degree that most of it feels generic, so many jokes in name only. disheartening until you remember you've sat through stuff like this for at least 10 years.
― tremendoid, Saturday, 4 August 2007 08:02 (eighteen years ago)
I shouldn't say everything was cursory, I quite liked the stabs at emotion, just for being there. I should stop thinking about it, my opinion is just gonna trend 'hater' if I keep it up. It's late. I should have drank first. It was "enjoyable", "just a movie" etc. fin.
― tremendoid, Saturday, 4 August 2007 08:20 (eighteen years ago)
Others would argue that Family Guy has taken the comedy torch and run with it in a more subversive direction.
Are those "others" you speak of 19-year-olds who don't know that "potty talk" /= "subversive?"
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Saturday, 4 August 2007 10:14 (eighteen years ago)
Oh here we go...
― the next grozart, Saturday, 4 August 2007 12:06 (eighteen years ago)
-- Shakey Mo Collier, Friday, August 3, 2007 12:03 PM (Yesterday) Bookmark Link
ppl who quote themselves are AWESOME
― kenan, Saturday, 4 August 2007 12:11 (eighteen years ago)
Still, "paraplegereeno".
― Noodle Vague, Saturday, 4 August 2007 13:43 (eighteen years ago)
I quite liked the stabs at emotion, just for being there.
The movie is something of a betrayal of the really interesting emotional point the series has reach in the last four or so seasons, but if I remember right it was written back then, so that makes sense; plus the current emotional scene is possibly too bleak and tortured for a big popular movie.
― Casuistry, Saturday, 4 August 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)
90 minutes of Moe suicide jokes wouldv'e rocked.
― Noodle Vague, Sunday, 5 August 2007 01:37 (eighteen years ago)
I was thinking the Marge/Homer dynamic, but yes, where was the Lenny-in-physical-pain stuff?
― Casuistry, Sunday, 5 August 2007 04:27 (eighteen years ago)
I thought this was entertaining enough. I didn't laugh all that much, just a few chuckles here and there (esp. compared to the non-stop yuks of the 5-year-olds in the theater at 11 PM on a Tuesday night, who seemed to love any and all instances of comedic violence) -- but I had a good time.
― jaymc, Wednesday, 15 August 2007 13:13 (eighteen years ago)
SPOILERS!
I saw this last night, and had mixed feelings about it. There were numerous one-off gags that were really funny, but the main story felt kinda predictable and safe. Okay, it was nice that they focused on the Simpsons family, and tried to invest some emotion into it (Marge's video), but on the other hand the whole scheme (Homer fucks up/is bad father, but in the end proves his worth) felt played out, and didn't really do anythig the series hadn't already done a hundred times.
I guess if you see the film as an extended TV episode it was guide entertaining... But like someone mentioned, since the movie has been so long in the making, you'd think the writers would've pulled off their guards and done something more unexpected and daring. The biggest disappointment was the finale, which fell totally flat. Homer rides the bike, throws away the bomb, and... that's it. He's the hero. How cliched can you get? I guess the guys behind South Park were right in doing the South Park movie while the series was in prime, because the movie felt like it went even further than the series had done before. Whereas the Simpsons movie was perfectly funny, but also felt calculated and safe.
Some random remarks:
* Lisa's love-story was totally tacked-on, seemed like writers thought they need to provide her with a storyline of her own too.
* The meta-jokes about this not being the TV show weren't really that funny. Okay, this is a movie, you don't have to watch commercials in the middle, we get the point.
* The other end credit jokes were nice, but the one about Maggie's first word was really cheap. Though I guess it was meant to be cheap.
* What was the point of that one dude dying in the end? Had the film-makers promised some character would die, and this was their way of dealing with it?
* Am I the only one who was worried about what happened to the Spider-Pig? It was left in the burning house! And then the house collapsed! Seemed like the movie totally forgot about the whole pig.
― Tuomas, Monday, 20 August 2007 07:51 (eighteen years ago)
Spiderpig was no more - he had become Harry Plopper. It was Harry Plopper who disappeared from the plot. (Me? Pedantic?)
― Guilty_Boksen, Monday, 20 August 2007 08:19 (eighteen years ago)
Oh, but otherwise Tuomas OTM.
I enjoyed the film as a series of one liners, but the plot was pretty lame and was all to familiar. However, when it comes down to it I laughed a lot and will enjoy it again when it come out on DVD (for the xmas market).
― Guilty_Boksen, Monday, 20 August 2007 08:27 (eighteen years ago)
Dr. Nick's catchphrase on the show was "Hi, everybody!". His last words were "Bye, everybody!". I bet the writers had been sitting on that one for ages.
* Am I the only one who was worried about what happened to the Spider-Pig? It was left in the burning house! And then the house collapsed! Seemed like the movie totally forgot about the whole pig
He will appear in an upcoming episode.
― abanana, Monday, 20 August 2007 09:29 (eighteen years ago)
Ah, hope they'll explain how he was miraculously saved from the burning and collapsing house.
― Tuomas, Monday, 20 August 2007 12:21 (eighteen years ago)
"The choral version of "Spider Pig" from the movie soundtrack, credited to Hans Zimmer, reached #24 on the British singles chart for the week ending 2007-08-05. At 64 seconds, it is the shortest track to ever reach the British top 40."
― Whiney G. Weingarten, Monday, 20 August 2007 15:00 (eighteen years ago)
Maybe it's cuz I've caught the show only about half the time in the last 4 seasons, but I thought the Marge/Homer dynamic was far more touching here than anything in Ratatouille. What really interesting emotional point of the series do you mean re M/H, Cas?
also, "You're a woman. You'll hang onto it your entire life" most penetrating movie line of the year thus far.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:02 (eighteen years ago)
Who said that line to whom?
― Eric H., Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
Marge to Lisa.
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:15 (eighteen years ago)
assuming nothing in The Apatow Canon tops it.
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:18 (eighteen years ago)
not that i've seen or heard, and you're right, the line was awesome
― Mr. Que, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:19 (eighteen years ago)
oh for the love of god.
― ^@^, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:24 (eighteen years ago)
morbz if you liked that penetrating insight may i recommend a little television program called 'reba'
― and what, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:27 (eighteen years ago)
hang on to what?
― blueski, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:29 (eighteen years ago)
Anger
― kenan, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:36 (eighteen years ago)
For the last few seasons it has been more or less explicit that Marge is going to leave Homer as soon as the kids are grown.
Of course, due to the nature of the show, this is mostly because she's had to put up with him for eighteen years plus backstory. And since the kids don't grow, she will be stuck with him forever, except in flash-forwards. All that is implicit, which is probably a good thing.
In the movie, the weight of what Marge has already put up with in her life seems greatly reduced, and it's back to the simpler "I'll put up with you forever" plots of the earlier seasons. I kind of like the dizzying "Who's Afraid Of Virginia Wolf?"-style menace of their recent relationship -- but again, only because they've "earned" it over the past 18 years.
― Casuistry, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:48 (eighteen years ago)
women are going to be hanging onto a lot of anger caused by ILXors
― Dr Morbius, Tuesday, 4 September 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)
i am watching this 'on demand'. this is what i demanded. it sucks.
― sleepingbag, Sunday, 20 October 2013 02:19 (twelve years ago)
Coming out on my 48th birthday
https://variety.com/2025/film/news/simpsons-movie-sequel-summer-2027-release-date-1236534270/
― Proust Ian Rush (Camaraderie at Arms Length), Tuesday, 30 September 2025 08:17 (three months ago)
Wild to think that the first movie came out 20 years the Simpsons shorts first aired on the Tracey Ullman Show, and the second movie is coming out 20 years after *that*.
― jaymc, Tuesday, 30 September 2025 12:36 (three months ago)