― MarkH, Friday, 23 August 2002 09:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 09:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― MarkH, Friday, 23 August 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 09:24 (twenty-three years ago)
If you have VEINY LEGzz0r and knobbly knees - NEVER re: the really quite repulsive steeeeenky old mang on the tube last night. Actually I should be more hardline and say NO. If you are too hot then SURELY air-conditioning in the modern office would solve this problem.
― Sarah (starry), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― jel -- (jel), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:31 (twenty-three years ago)
― gareth (gareth), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― angela (angela), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― nickie (nickie), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― MarkH, Friday, 23 August 2002 09:40 (twenty-three years ago)
The only time I've ever worn shorts in public (actually, in my OWN HOME, they were pyjamas), my pasty legs got laughed at and asked if I ever go outside (Which is stupid, cos it's not like I'd be wearing shorts anyway, but he is a twat I still have revenge fantasies over, so that figures).
So no, I would never make you suffer like that.
― Graham (graham), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Friday, 23 August 2002 09:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 10:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 23 August 2002 11:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 23 August 2002 11:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 11:40 (twenty-three years ago)
The first time I started this - about 5 years ago - there was a protest from management. Some fool even started to intriduce a dress code. This came to nothing, I suspect once someone slightly less foolish had pointed out that it would need to be negotiated with someone as it represented a change in the terms and conditions of service and also that the Sex Discrimination Act would come into play.
― Tim Bateman, Friday, 23 August 2002 11:43 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim Bateman, Friday, 23 August 2002 11:44 (twenty-three years ago)
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 23 August 2002 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Tim Bateman, Friday, 23 August 2002 11:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 23 August 2002 12:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 12:09 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Friday, 23 August 2002 12:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 August 2002 12:39 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 12:46 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:04 (twenty-three years ago)
― Steve.n., Friday, 23 August 2002 13:18 (twenty-three years ago)
― Emma, Friday, 23 August 2002 13:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― Sean (Sean), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:54 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 13:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:00 (twenty-three years ago)
Oh heavens, I wasn't mad! :-) Fret not -- but this is further proof of the power of smileys and the problems their lack can cause. ;-)
I'm so glad everyone here agrees with me about how awful shorts are.
So Dan and I don't count? *SOBS*
I'm about to spend a week in the Nevada desert
Say hi to my housemate Danielle for me (I'm assuming you speak of Burning Man, natch).
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:09 (twenty-three years ago)
Surely speedo = 100*all attributes of shorts + skin-tight? How can you advocate that and not regular shorts?
(I fear I may have inadvertently answered my own question there...)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:11 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:14 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:16 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:20 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― J'accuse!!!! (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 14:57 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 23 August 2002 15:06 (twenty-three years ago)
I'm not advocating speedos, just offering it up for amusement purposes. I'm rail-thin, so I can get away with it, as much as anyone can "get away" with such a garment. Picture it with the rest of my costume: a fishnet with plastic toy fish tied on, and... well, that's it. Fetching, no?
― Sean (Sean), Friday, 23 August 2002 15:13 (twenty-three years ago)
Hmmm...a modern Poseidon in the middle of the desert?
― j.lu (j.lu), Friday, 23 August 2002 15:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Friday, 23 August 2002 16:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 23 August 2002 16:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Friday, 23 August 2002 17:08 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 23 August 2002 17:12 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Friday, 23 August 2002 20:13 (twenty-three years ago)
my legs are about my best feature and I will conyinue to show them off.
― chris (chris), Sunday, 25 August 2002 10:38 (twenty-three years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Sunday, 25 August 2002 10:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― chris (chris), Sunday, 25 August 2002 10:53 (twenty-three years ago)
I wouldn't mind the "shorts metal"-type shorts in the office, with the chain wallets and leg tattoos and white socks and sneakers, but I don't think this is what people here have in mind.
― felicity (felicity), Sunday, 25 August 2002 17:32 (twenty-three years ago)
― Chupa-Cabras (vicc13), Sunday, 25 August 2002 17:41 (twenty-three years ago)
― donut bitch, Sunday, 25 August 2002 17:58 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Sunday, 25 August 2002 18:26 (twenty-three years ago)
― lyra (lyra), Sunday, 25 August 2002 18:48 (twenty-three years ago)
― boxcubed (boxcubed), Sunday, 25 August 2002 18:56 (twenty-three years ago)
The drinking of shorts in the office: classic or dud?
― Tom (Groke), Sunday, 25 August 2002 19:07 (twenty-three years ago)
― Graham (graham), Sunday, 25 August 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)
― sundar subramanian, Sunday, 25 August 2002 22:36 (twenty-three years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Sunday, 25 August 2002 23:22 (twenty-three years ago)
― Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 26 August 2002 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)
and you see sooooooo often here. what do those ppl trying to say?it's the seveties jeans type who's getting older and thinks he looks more responsible with a tie, but can't get rid of the jeans? maybe it's a way of trying to attract young chicks. I don't know.
― erik, Monday, 26 August 2002 11:45 (twenty-three years ago)
― Maria (Maria), Monday, 26 August 2002 12:47 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Monday, 26 August 2002 13:26 (twenty-three years ago)
ahem!!!
― Dave M. (rotten03), Monday, 26 August 2002 15:50 (twenty-three years ago)
― Mr Noodles (Mr Noodles), Monday, 26 August 2002 15:56 (twenty-three years ago)
A POX on fashion in Seattle. I'm cursed to see at least two a week. LYRA, SAVE US!
― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 26 August 2002 17:19 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 26 August 2002 17:34 (twenty-three years ago)
― sundar subramanian, Monday, 26 August 2002 17:40 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 26 August 2002 19:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 26 August 2002 19:59 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:01 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:03 (twenty-three years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:10 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:21 (twenty-three years ago)
― Nicole (Nicole), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:23 (twenty-three years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:25 (twenty-three years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 26 August 2002 20:27 (twenty-three years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 26 August 2002 21:03 (twenty-three years ago)
But with a tie? Well, er... How about the following 'ensemble'?
Shorts: The plain, single-colour (i.e. black or dark blue), smart, tailored variety, finishing between just above the knee and mid thigh.
Shirt: The plain, single-colour (i.e. white or light blue) 'office' type, WORN TUCKED INTO THE SHORTS! Either short-sleeved or with long sleeves carefully folded up army-style to just above the elbow.
Tie: Single-colour, or two or three sober colours. Design neither too complicated nor too gaudy.
Socks: Plain, white, with turnover tops, and finishing just below the knee.
Shoes: Black leather.
Avoid at all costs: (i) Sandals! Need I say more? (ii) The colour grey. Too many echoes of school uniform! (iii) Bow ties!
Has the advantage of not showing too much bare leg. Would look okay on a woman. (Or would it look too schoolgirlish with the long socks?) But, smart or stupid? I can't decide. It's for the court of public opinion to bring in its verdict!
― D.W., Friday, 13 December 2002 15:56 (twenty-three years ago)
― Speeds Man, Sunday, 22 February 2004 04:19 (twenty-two years ago)
Hello! I'm from Germany and I wear shorts year round. But in our region it is not common to wear shorts between middle of octobre an the beginning of april. So we now are a small group of people who like wearing shorts year round. Our ONLY interest is to wear shorts, this is nothing sexual and we are woman and men . On your site The Wearing of Shorts in the Office the last post from February 22nd 2004 is obvioursly someone who also likes wearing shorts even in winter time. Please send this e-mail to that person (if you know the adress) so perhaps I will get an answer. Thank you! Gerold (I found your site on google "wear shorts year round")
― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)
― Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:14 (twenty years ago)
― walter kranz (walterkranz), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:16 (twenty years ago)
― the food has a top snake of 1 (ex machina), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:32 (twenty years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:49 (twenty years ago)
― Leon C. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 30 August 2005 00:52 (twenty years ago)
The only place shorts should be allowed is on the sports field. And possibly on the beach. Otherwise NO.-- Emma, Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
-- Emma, Friday, August 23, 2002 4:20 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
NO! shorts are a fashion faux-pas, look, i even told some of you people (dr.c, toby), but would they listen? oh no! i cannot condone shorts (even brown ones)-- gareth (gareth), Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
-- gareth (gareth), Friday, August 23, 2002 4:34 AM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link
In the office? No. Of course not! But really, are these not the 2 most uptight posters ever, or are these the two most uptight posters ever?
Shorts are the thing that get me through the misery of summer, both in that they keep me from overheating and in that they free calves, toned during a long winter on the Stairmaster, from their pant-shackles.
― Jesse, Thursday, 13 March 2008 05:27 (eighteen years ago)