Once Upon a Time in America

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
It's really really not that good, is it? The story's stupid, the make-up jobs are distracting, the clever editing is laboured, the raw brutality is a mask for gauzy sentimentality, the best scenes are "hommages" (ie copied heh), and the music is not very memorable.

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 September 2002 21:17 (twenty-three years ago)

remind me what's good about it

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 September 2002 21:18 (twenty-three years ago)

(better films in terrestrial tonight = falling down, gi jane and caligula)

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 September 2002 21:33 (twenty-three years ago)

I watched Eloge De L'Amour on BBC4 tonight instead. I liked the colour parts. As for the Leone (I went out with a woman named after him - Leone as a first name), I remember some lovely widescreen composition, distinctive pacing (very to the taste of this Japanophile, if that's a word) and strong acting, but I never liked it nearly as much as his westerns. Making sentimentality pass for toughness always sells, though.

I didn't fancy this version of Caligula they are showing - they have apparently taken out all the soft porn bits! Utter madness! Falling Down is good (I've never liked Michael Douglas, but suspect I may have been unfair to him), and GI Jane is just there, sort of not anything like as bad as it could easily have been, but really not good in any way (maybe Demi's muscles and haircut!).

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Saturday, 14 September 2002 21:53 (twenty-three years ago)

the music is not very memorable

I understand music is a subjective thing, etc....but man oh man, you are wrong here. :)


As for the film itself...(shrugs shoudlers) I think it's one of the finest. Can't wait for the DVD!

See also:
Once Upon a Time in America vs. Godfather

Joe (Joe), Saturday, 14 September 2002 22:09 (twenty-three years ago)

are we talking abt the same film? (ok calling it the "vertigo of gangster movies" suggests you have a theory of why it's good not dumb so SPILL joe)

widescreen composition probably yeah: actually one of the problem i have with it is he's replaying old shtick from his own movies as much as anything, and this wd count as that

the thinness of the story sucks out everything he builds up, re his somnolent cineaste-dream of the new york of 80 yrs ago

mark s (mark s), Saturday, 14 September 2002 23:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I would say "Mark S! It's CLASSICK!" but then I fell asleep last night while mumbling "it's goooo..."

nathalie (nathalie), Sunday, 15 September 2002 05:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Which version did you see? I haven't seen it in forever, but suspect you may be at least partially right (dreaded rememberances of "Yesterday"). I seem to recall it lacking wit - true?

James Blount (James Blount), Sunday, 15 September 2002 09:00 (twenty-three years ago)

the 4-hr version

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 15 September 2002 09:37 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah it was really really long. Leone wanted to make a godfather type epic (he was offered to direct it and he refused it). I had to play some music to get through it (I would come back and felt i missed nothing).

You could remember the music becuz there were basically two tunes that got played over and over again, which was annoying (there was more but those two tunes kept being played).

did you see the movie after that mark: Called 'Suture'. I'd like to know what the screenwriters were on when they were writing this story.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 15 September 2002 11:20 (twenty-three years ago)

i have it on video, i've never watched it: when i wz at sight and sound, it ran a v.positive piece on it at release

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 15 September 2002 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)

watched half of it but sleep won!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 15 September 2002 12:51 (twenty-three years ago)

I was flicking through the channels and Suture looked quite quite bonkers, and it had senator Palmer from 24 in it too.

chris (chris), Sunday, 15 September 2002 12:55 (twenty-three years ago)

yeah...I'd like to know how it ended. I mean, two half brothers (one black, one white). how couldn't the doctors, friends not tell 'em apart. It's a good idea (well it is! it is!!!).

it also had the gun-mad cop from police academy too.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 15 September 2002 13:01 (twenty-three years ago)

aren't they identical twins? who just happen to be played by a black and a white actor w.no physical resemblance?

mark s (mark s), Sunday, 15 September 2002 13:11 (twenty-three years ago)

(ok calling it the "vertigo of gangster movies" suggests you have a theory of why it's good not dumb so SPILL joe)

I think in the same sense that its highlight seems to be more on exploring emotional experiences: loss and betrayal. There are some films where things like plot, structure, etc., take a definitive second spot to overall atmosphere. I'd say that OUaTiA is one of those movies.

**SPOILERS**
Certainly, if one were to focus on the plot, it is filled with big question marks (some of mine: Max apparently becomes a visible business figure on the West Coast, and this escapes Noodles' notice for over 3 decades? What about Noodles' severe opium addiction leaving NYC? Why would he not re-establish himself in crime upon fleeing NYC, since that has been all he has known his whole life?) or subplots that are hinted may have initially had a bigger role in the movie (e.g., the significance of Joe Pesci and Treat Williams' characters).

But, I don't know, these seem like minutiae to me...they are not the main focus of the movie, which are lost love and personal betrayal. Leone said: "It's not a realistic film, not historical. It's fantasic, it's a fable. I force myself to make fables for adults." and also "It's not a chronological film, and it's not just a gangster story. It's a story of friendship, time, memory, hate and love."

The comparison to Vertigo is that these are the very two major themes of that one, and again its perhaps the greatest example of a Hitchcock film where plot and/or structure (i.e., think of North by Northwest, Rear Window, Notorious) are comparatively downplayed for an experience that seems more dark, brooding, 'personal' (for lack of a better word; I say that because Hitchcock's explorations of the emotion of fear always struck me as relatively more detached and playful in their execution). To me, a movie like The Godfather is more like a North by Northwest of gangster movies, with an emphasis (comparatively speaking) on plot, characters, and pure entertainment. I think OUaTiA reaches in for something deeper...

Of the music, someone described the repetition of the main themes throughout the movie as "annoying". I think that's totally missing the point. There's no way for me the movie would have been half as effective without those repetition of themes. Leone: "I have the music programmed before I begin shooting, so I can use it while I'm shooting. For me, the music is part of the dialogue, and many times much more important than the dialogue. It becomes an expression in itself." Morricone (the composer): "Leone granted a greater importance to the use of music than most other directors. For him, music was really as important as dialogue and all the other components. Therefore, he felt it was important to ask me to write the music before he shot the film...It wasn't because of our friendship; it was strictly his particular style..." Milchan (the producer): "By the time we started shooting we had recorded easily two-thirds of the music and it was playing on the set...the actors walked on the set knowing the exact mood and the feel of the movie."

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 15 September 2002 14:38 (twenty-three years ago)

''aren't they identical twins? who just happen to be played by a black and a white actor w.no physical resemblance?''

it could be but i can't remmeber now...

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 15 September 2002 14:59 (twenty-three years ago)

I have never seen this film, but I am curious as to how a non-Western Sergio Leone film would appear, and so am interested in it. I've been put off by reports of a brutal rape scene.

DV (dirtyvicar), Sunday, 15 September 2002 20:48 (twenty-three years ago)

The rape scene is pretty brutal (though not graphic, IMO), made so by what immediately preceded it, which is an impossibly lavish, romantic dinner followed by a poignant scene on the beach between the two characters in question, where you think they are finally opening up to one another. It is the true moment of death for the perpetrator; it's like in that moment, he is committing a kind of spiritual suicide. From that point onwards, it's as if he is a ghost looking back on his life...

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 15 September 2002 22:41 (twenty-three years ago)

made so by what immediately preceded it

Oops! That should say "made ESPECIALLY so" (I don't want to suggest that the scene would not be brutal otherwise).

Joe (Joe), Sunday, 15 September 2002 22:46 (twenty-three years ago)

'Suture' - clever central 'idea' that raises lots of questions abt race/identity etc., v. stylishly made, but all told, too much film studies and not enough noir. Or story.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Suture = grebt. Gi Jane = Tat. Falling Down = RoXor. Calligula = Mentalist.

Best film of the weekend though was surely Midnight Run.

Pete (Pete), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:07 (twenty-three years ago)

'Midnight Run' = grebt. 'Wild Things' = bettah.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:13 (twenty-three years ago)

sod my washing machine broke down and i had to go to use sistrah becky's and i forgot to tape wild things

haha alonso tate: yaphet kotto already has the best smile=>grin in cinema but when he's arresting serrano and all he does is break into a smile!!

mark s (mark s), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:18 (twenty-three years ago)

Did none of you watch Poison Ivy II for fuxake?

Could someone remind me why people got all hot and bothered about Falling Down, when I thought it was intelligent, literary and moving? I'm sure some people found it pretentious, but i don't care about them - it was the political/ideological objections that i recall bubbling around.

Alan (Alan), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:21 (twenty-three years ago)

yes alan, but poison ivy II was on friday (also i have seen it before: jaime pressley = v.weird shape, sort of rowr oo-er ee-ew rowr um)

Falling Down => white rage is ok => go tim mcveigh (i think this is a silly reading but i think it was what pushed buttons)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:24 (twenty-three years ago)

How is Jaime Pressly a weird shape, Mark S? I liked Wild Things prolly because I am terrible at films and can never tell what's going to happen so the twists in the tale which were no doubt v. obvious to the viewer with half a brain were v. shocking and exciting for me.

Emma, Monday, 16 September 2002 09:37 (twenty-three years ago)

Mark S, why is your washing machine called Sod?

Falling down = pretentious?? am I not reading too deeply into it? I just thought it was a slightly different take on an action movie.

Falling Down = man gets angry at world, goes to pieces, shoots all in sight

Commando = man gets angry at kidnappers, goes haywire, shoots them all.

chris (chris), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:38 (twenty-three years ago)

it is called SOD becz it doesn't bladdy work

JP = a turned-up nose AND a turned-up butt!! in fact round the pelvic area she looks a bit like an articulated Star Wars figurine

when my mum was little she cd apparently do this comical walk w.a teddy bear balanced on her bum and how she has terrible back problems => i ph34r JP is heading the same way

mark s (mark s), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:44 (twenty-three years ago)

did they show the cinema version of Wild Things (I can only get BBC channels not commercial UK terrestrial channels) - i bet they didn't!

Midnight Run and Falling Down both holding up well and destined for classic status.

I like OUATIA, but switched over just before De Niro goes out on his ill-fated date with McGovern since by that point all my favourite bits have already happened. They should really have got another actress to play Becky in the 60s (and yes, I have read the defence to this point).

Jeff W (Jeff W), Monday, 16 September 2002 09:54 (twenty-three years ago)

ill-fated date!!!! haha dear god yes u cd say that

actually i quite like that scene where she's taking off her make-up (well de niro is lousy, consistent w.his perf throughout the pic — ALL the kids are better than the respective grown-ups except whoever plays the young james woods — but i like the way she uses diane keaton shtick as a fakey actress-tantrum, which he sees through)

mark s (mark s), Monday, 16 September 2002 10:02 (twenty-three years ago)

So I take it I was the only one that watched Scum instead, then?

Midnight Run was classic, tho. Whatever did happen to Charles Grodin?

Mr Swygart (mrswygart), Monday, 16 September 2002 10:08 (twenty-three years ago)

Scum was Saturday yes? I did watch some but switched it off before that absolutely horrible rape scene, it turns my stomach. But Carlin and the pool balls is classic.

chris (chris), Monday, 16 September 2002 10:10 (twenty-three years ago)

chris the whole point of falling down is based on whether we think he goes insane or not and der der der what IS sanity in this krazy mixed up society etc etc

bob zemko (bob), Monday, 16 September 2002 11:36 (twenty-three years ago)

Sorry to go off on the Suture tangent. I can recommend seeing the trailer for Suture, but not the film itself. The trailer has the absolute best moment of the film, and it's stunning - the two guys separated by a shower curtain, pointing guns at each other. Fantastic. The film really only has one joke (everyone comments on how these two people look alike, when they don't at all), which gets tiresome.

Ernest P., Monday, 16 September 2002 14:43 (twenty-three years ago)

The best film of the weekend was GHOSTBUSTERS! Not having seen it since I was 13, I wasn't sure how well it would hold up, but I needn't have worried. It formed an interesting little Sunday evening Bill Murray double bill with his bit in WILD THINGS (which was very poor). I would almost be tempted to do a Bill Murray CorD/S&D, but surely no one would "dud" him. Surely?

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 16 September 2002 14:49 (twenty-three years ago)

(Also - I kept dipping in and out of OUT OF CONTROL on BBC1 which was TERRIFIC! Tamzin Outhwaite = new Ken Loach postergirl)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Monday, 16 September 2002 14:52 (twenty-three years ago)

Bill Murray is the best thing in Wild Things by a lap - but then so would Tamzin Outhwaite be so....

No-ones mentioned Saving Private Ryan yet. Er....

Pete (Pete), Monday, 16 September 2002 14:54 (twenty-three years ago)

why was it on twice in one week?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 16 September 2002 14:55 (twenty-three years ago)

No-ones mentioned Saving Private Ryan yet.

I think the world is waking up to the realization that any film that involves the premise that one must rescue Matt Damon from death is surely by default a flawed enterprise. The Bourne Identity may have done good enough business but would rival Spider-Man for box office take if in fact the idea was that you were to cheer for the CIA or whoever was after his butt.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 16 September 2002 14:58 (twenty-three years ago)

Well yes, Bill Murray is always classic (apart from 'The Razor's Edge' prob.) - I'm esp. fond of the v. underrated 'Quick Change', which is like a gd Donald Westlake nov (unlike all the bad films actually adapted from Westlakes...)

But I'm saddened that ppl don't share my enthusiasm for 'Wild Things', which I think is a truly great piece of softcore glam trash - the absurd, 'over-determined' number of twists/reversals, the glossy photog, the lezzing up, the sleaze, the genre cynicism - it's like 'Mullholland Drive' meets 'Showgirls'!

Andrew L (Andrew L), Monday, 16 September 2002 15:40 (twenty-three years ago)

let me tell right that I absolutely loved the 'Wild things'. I was thinking that it would be another thriller (but there's nothing to watch) but there was the ridiculous amount of twists that it was grebt, the sleaze, denise richards and Bill murray. no one was the good guy/girl (maybe the female cop, though she wasn't that interested in solving the case).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 16 September 2002 16:12 (twenty-three years ago)

''The Bourne Identity may have done good enough business but would rival Spider-Man for box office take if in fact the idea was that you were to cheer for the CIA or whoever was after his butt.''

the bourne identity was easily as good as spiderman. I don't like matt damon either but the plot made you forget that he was there.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 16 September 2002 16:13 (twenty-three years ago)

I don't like matt damon either but the plot made you forget that he was there.

I have heard this theory applied to Keanu Reeves and The Matrix as well. Alas, I cannot overcome that barrier.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 16 September 2002 16:23 (twenty-three years ago)

you can't watch the Matrix! are you sick Ned?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 16 September 2002 16:26 (twenty-three years ago)

I have fought this particular battle for three years and I will not be moved.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 16 September 2002 16:32 (twenty-three years ago)

Emma, some later posts more or less make the point that only a mad person would anticipate such an absurd amount of twist-throwing in Wild Things (about which Andrew is spot on).

Falling Down was read by some as a right wing movie: the ordinary white man unleashing his righteous rage on a world that is unfair to ordinary white men. This bears very little resemblance to the actual film, obv.

Right on Out Of Control - an obvious attempt to cover both Scum and Made In Britain, in which context it falls (no iconic central performance, for a start), but it was really excellent - and yes, Tamzin Outhwaite was extraordinarily good.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Monday, 16 September 2002 19:13 (twenty-three years ago)

one year passes...
i have just watched most of this film. it's really really not that good at all - in fact it could be terrible or maybe i just don't get it or won't submit to it. The music is terrible, the storyline is dull as well unbelievable and the acting is poor. As somone said upthread the tricksy editing is laughable and it also suffers from that problem with all italian (or italian made films) its dubbed into that language it was filmed in. I know the title flags it as a fairytale but its really not believable on any level and even some fantastical fairytales ARE.

jed_ (jed), Sunday, 11 January 2004 16:53 (twenty-one years ago)

two months pass...
why is it in slow motion?!

cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 16 March 2004 19:21 (twenty-one years ago)

four months pass...
Sheesh, it really does go *totally bonkers* at the end, doesn't it? It's sad because by the end of it, you really can't fool yourself into thinking of it as a classic of any sort, and yet there are so many wonderful scenes that calling it a travesty or something like that doesn't work either..so you're left at a sort of middle ground, but you don't WANT a middle ground, you want an all-out classic, because that's what the best scenes promise to deliver. Very frustating.

I agree with mark s that the kids are great - tho I don't think DeNiro's rubbish in it, either. One thing I really like about it is how it shows the flip-side of the Corleone/Scarface figure: instead of the OTT maniac who gets success only through losing his soul and alienating his loved ones, we have this very low-key, "About Schmidt" type figure whose bitterness/regret seems very human, very banal even, although the circumstances leading to his fall were just as dramatic as those in "The Godfather" and "Scarface". There could've been a great movie about Noodle's life in Buffalo (well, maybe not, but I do think that the idea that it happened lends a lot of weight to the movie).

I can't really see why the fuck it's supposed to be seen as a fairy tale.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 01:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there *any point at all* to anything shown after the garbage truck?

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 01:23 (twenty-one years ago)

(ok, so that's only like 2 mins of film, but still)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

a lot of stuff is so out of the blue, too: like Noodles suddenly showing up with a wifey who wuvs him (which sort of leads away from the Noodles as an emotional misfit theme that the movie previously seemed to be exploring, and when you have your main character resort to rape twice in one movie, suudenly ignoring the issues raised by that seems pretty unforgiveable.)

SPOILER AHEAD:

Same goes for Max's threachery; it's just suddenly THERE.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 01:37 (twenty-one years ago)

i just saw this movie for the first time, it was so much more insane than i expected. what a crazy movie! (especially weird: the stirring sentimental morricone theme sweeping in while kids have sex with a child prostitute)

s1ocki (slutsky), Saturday, 31 July 2004 02:06 (twenty-one years ago)

i can't believe what i'm reading. This movie is CLASSIC all the way through!! Daniel, Max's treachery, as you call it, is there right from the start - when he's a kid, he says he doesn't like bosses - his ego gets him right from the start. Check his "some partner I got" line when he greedily insists they divy up the bounty when Noodles just wants to hang with his girl.

I can't believe the haters on this board sometimes...

roger adultery (roger adultery), Saturday, 31 July 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

* MO' SPOILERS*

A lack of respect for authority and extreme amounts of ambition != willingness to betray your friends. Max already HAD what he wanted (he *was* the boss - he had partners, granted, but not superiors), and his "work before chicks" attitude is just common gangster pragmatism. I *suppose* the desperateness of the times might have justified screwing over the rebellious and alltogether difficult Noodles, but offing your other partners in the process? That's a level of cruelty that the movie previoulsy never attributed to the guy.

And hey Roger, I'm not hatin' just for the sake of it! I *wanted* to like this movie! In fact, by the end of disc 1 I was all ready to go "this is a total classic, what's everyone on about?" Too bad it went off the rails so badly towards the end...

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Can I just complain about the dvd for a second? What the fuck were they thinking when they end disc one in the middle of a great scene? And shortly after that on disc two is a perfectly good intermission spot? I don't get it.

But anyway, this movie is a big friggin' crazy mess and It is fascinating and the repeated musical themes are just deranged and the ending just boggles the mind and the whole thing would probably be amazing to see on cough syrup. I love that freeze-frame of DeNiro's demented mug at the end too. It will never surpass OUATITWest for me, beacause that film is so beautiful and hellish that it makes me want to cry, but it is still worth the time it takes to say "what the fuck was THAT all about". And the kidz stuff is priceless. Sometimes I think the whole reason that movie exists is for the one shot of the kids and the bridge. And it's worth it if that's the case.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 31 July 2004 12:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus, Dario Argento and Sergio Leone were the only two people to truly understand Jennifer Connelly's genius.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 31 July 2004 13:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus, the way that Elizabeth McGovern says the word "noodles", how great is that? Her voice, in general, is some sorta miracle.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 31 July 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Can I just complain about the dvd for a second? What the fuck were they thinking when they end disc one in the middle of a great scene? And shortly after that on disc two is a perfectly good intermission spot? I don't get it.

Yeah, definite "Monty Python & The Holy Grail" moment there.

I can't get into the "it's a mess and it's GREBT!" pov because it still fells like a let-down to me when compared to what it could've been judging by the early stages of its saga, if that makes any sense. I dunno, I'm not anti-ludicrous or anything, I just like to know early on if a movie's gonna go that way, or at least before the story gets intriguing enough for me to reallly care about how it turns out (cue my enormous love/hate affair w/ David Lynch.)

I had no idea that it was gonna be about jewish gangs before I saw the movie! Does every ethnic minority in the U.S.A. have their own gangster epic? Rok.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 31 July 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus, Dario Argento and Sergio Leone were the only two people to truly understand Jennifer Connelly's genius.

Honorable mentions for Henson and Proyas, though.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Does every ethnic minority in the U.S.A. have their own gangster epic?

i shudder to think that the deer hunter is the closest thing to a (non-russian) slavic gangsta film ... but i digress.

i luvs once upon a time in america, sprawling mess though it is ... but if yer gonna get into just one leone film, the one to get is once upon a time in the west. perhaps later today i'll be assed to revive the thread praising THAT one.

Eisbär (llamasfur), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Does every ethnic minority in the U.S.A. have their own gangster epic?

Mine is Star Wars, I guess.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I think it's a weird classic, one of the most claustrophobic movies ever made. It's very much in line with "Once Upon a Time in the West" but Leone's attempt to mythologize the world of gangsters ultimately fails because he just doesn't pay enough attention to the telling detail. He's in love with all these devices, like the ringing telephone (it's still a haunting sequence, though), and because he simply doesn't care about the plot and has no eye for naturalistic detail. He looks for the telling detail in a gallows-humor fashion (as he does in the sequence toward the end of "Once Upon a Time in the West" when Jason Robards shoots up the railroad train from above, sticks a gun in his boot and shoots the guy through the boot, and then gets back on top of the train and puts his boot back on), but I don't think it works as well in the context of urban America as it does in the west. Whereas "Godfather part 2" is so attentive to the details and even though there are few things which seem obscure on first viewing, the plot and the theme of Michael's corruption ultimately work together, and upon a second viewing what seems murky in the plot is perfectly transparent. Whereas the plot in "America" just seems irrelevant.

Still, there's a vast affection and a vast sense of regret that comes through in "Once Upon a Time in America" and I suppose that's what Leone was after, not anything remotely naturalistic/realistic.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:33 (twenty-one years ago)

should be:

He's in love with all these devices, like the ringing telephone (it's still a haunting sequence, though), and because he simply doesn't care about the plot and has no eye for naturalistic detail, they come across as mere devices--he doesn't earn them.

eddie hurt (ddduncan), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)

"I dunno, I'm not anti-ludicrous or anything, I just like to know early on if a
movie's gonna go that way,"

Daniel, I getcha, but since Eddie brings up the telephone...well, that is one way the movie gives you an inkling that it is not gonna be your usual rags-to-riches saga. I mean, it goes on for what seems like forever!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 31 July 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

nobody's mentioned the dream theory - that all we see of noodles as young and old is an opium vision, a projection to make sense of the way things have turned out. He's smiling because he thinks he's a rich man, but he hasn't opened the suitcase; he thinks he's won over Max and the bad guys, even though his friends have had to die.
Way un-pc points to the rape scene where woman begs noodles to do it.

Queen Gonna peek one more time, Saturday, 31 July 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow, what a mess!

I finally saw this thing last night, the last of the major Leone films that I had not yet seen. Funny that this thread was revived the other day; I refused to read it 'cuz I knew I'd be seeing the flick last night. Lots of great stuff on this thread. My take is pretty much the same as Daniel's (i.e. lots of great scenes, want it to be great, ultimately frustrating), so I don't have a lot to add. Scott is also very much OTM, especially here:

It will never surpass OUATITWest for me, beacause that film is so beautiful and hellish that it makes me want to cry, but it is still worth the time it takes to say "what the fuck was THAT all about". And the kidz stuff is priceless. Sometimes I think the whole reason that movie exists is for the one shot of the kids and the bridge.

So true - I saw OUATITWest around 7 years ago; I bought that Rhino Morricone anthology a couple years back, and when the main theme from OUATITWest played it made my cry as I recalled my strong reactions to that film. I can't imagine the same happening with America (nothing against Morricone's music for the latter though - I thought it was fine). But Scott right again in that one of the main virtues of America is the gorgeous mise en scene. Those shots of the bridge really are fantastic and iconic. One of the great scenes - the abrupt switch in affect between the kids skipping along Brooklyn streets in the shadow of the bridge after depositing the money at the train station, and the sudden appearance of Bugsy.

also - Plus, the way that Elizabeth McGovern says the word "noodles", how great is that?

Yes!!

One other funny thing was that I went into it not remembering exactly who comprised the cast. So when Joe Pesci appeared onscreen, I gotta say my heart skipped a beat! Man, I love that guy. And Danny Aiello was great in his brief turn. And that one dude who played Beansie on the Sopranos even showed up (he's the guy who offers up the drunk for the kids to "roll").

And yeah, the early scenes with the kids were great, riveting. Wish they could have gone on longer. The kid who played the young Noodles was fantastic.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Friday, 6 August 2004 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)

the telephone scene is the best thing ever

s1ocki (slutsky), Friday, 6 August 2004 16:40 (twenty-one years ago)

The ringing started to bug me though.

I loved when Max entered the office after Noodles had phoned the police, and turned the handset around.

And yeah, in the beginning, who were the bad guys who had beat up Fat Moe? The guy that Noodles kills when he returns to Moe's looked like one of the Burt Young henchmen dudes. Which could mean they were Frankie's guys. But didn't the gang kill all of those guys after the jewel heist? And how did Max get the money out of the train station before Noodles got there? Didn't Moe have the only key?? I'm baffled.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:02 (twenty-one years ago)

i've always thought it was interesting that after making some of the boldest widescreen films ever, leone used the academy ratio for this one. maybe it was because the film's model (at least, hoped-for commercial model), the godfather, was in the academy ratio?

there is an increasingly large coterie of film critics who think this films is one of "the greatest of all time" etc.

||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:05 (twenty-one years ago)

oh wait, i'm completely mad. i'm thinking of a different film. this one is in widescreen.

||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

carry on.

||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:06 (twenty-one years ago)

And yet Once Upon a Time In the West still pwns this movie.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

well it has henry fonda, so duh.

||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

http://website.lineone.net/~braithwaitej/mainsite/overview/actors/fonda.jpg

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

...America is such a beautiful, messy work of art. The child actors in it were leagues above the cloying twerps that pop up in movies today. The kid who played young Noodles reminds me of Joe Strummer for some reason.

Jay Vee (Manon_70), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Kid who played Noodles was outstanding.

I think it was widescreen but not "cinemascope", maybe? I'm no expert. There's still some breathtaking use of the screen-space though. Like those Brooklyn street scenes. And that great long boom shot of the hotel in Florida, the camera recording all those extras scurrying about in all corners of the screen before training upon Max and Noodles reclining on the beach. This is definitely one to see in the theater. Also I have to say while a couple scenes may have been a bit sluggish, I never felt bored. I can't imagine how they could have cropped over an hour off the thing for American release without completely destroying it.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Fonda in West is great: plays the BAD GUY and WEARS BLACK.

Monetizing Eyeballs (diamond), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:16 (twenty-one years ago)

and he SHOOTS UNARMED WOMEN AND CHILDREN

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

fuckin fantastic.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:19 (twenty-one years ago)

"I can't imagine how they could have cropped over an hour
off the thing for American release without completely destroying it."


They did completely destroy it.

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Once upon a Time in America is 1.85:1, not CinemaScope.

All of Leone's other major films are 2.35:1 TechniScope (a European CinemaScope competitor/ripoff, I believe).

So yeah, relatively speaking, Once upon a Time in America is not a very wide film.

||amateur!st|| (amateurist), Friday, 6 August 2004 17:25 (twenty-one years ago)

three years pass...

I just finished disc 1 and I am enjoying the hell out of it right now...

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 26 January 2008 18:51 (seventeen years ago)

William Forsythe as Cockeye - one of my favorite 'minor' performances ever

If Assholes Could Fly This Place Would Be An Airport, Saturday, 26 January 2008 19:24 (seventeen years ago)

mark s is otm about the make up though.

chakles, Saturday, 26 January 2008 19:43 (seventeen years ago)

just finished this. I'm weary now...but I liked it.

Bo Jackson Overdrive, Saturday, 26 January 2008 20:57 (seventeen years ago)

Empty, pretty.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn, Saturday, 26 January 2008 21:20 (seventeen years ago)

once upon a time in the west absolutely pwns it. it's one of the best films evah.

or something, Saturday, 26 January 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)

and henry fonda in it may well get one of my five noms if there ws ever an 'oscars of all time'.

or something, Saturday, 26 January 2008 21:35 (seventeen years ago)

three years pass...

mark s otm. and such small portions...

http://blogs.indiewire.com/theplaylist/archives/new_cut_of_sergio_leones_once_upon_a_time_in_america_on_the_way_with_40/

history mayne, Thursday, 10 March 2011 17:38 (fourteen years ago)

Dag. I love Leone, but the last thing this movie needs is more movie.

Josh in Chicago, Thursday, 10 March 2011 17:52 (fourteen years ago)

one year passes...

New restoration is revelatory to some eyes:

http://blogs.indiewire.com/pressplay/cannes-2012-once-upon-a-time-in-america-restored

World Congress of Itch (Dr Morbius), Sunday, 20 May 2012 14:50 (thirteen years ago)

one month passes...

gave up during the florida hotel scene where max attacks noodles cos he called him crazy. had been dragging on for a good hour before then tho tbf. kids scenes are great.

snoopsheepysheep (darraghmac), Monday, 2 July 2012 03:27 (thirteen years ago)

four months pass...

OK, this clarifies things for me.

The original 229-minute version to screen at Film Forum isn’t new—this is the edition that European and home-video fans have known for years—but the restoration, performed this year by Bologna Cinematheque, is. At last spring’s Cannes, an even longer, 256-minute version debuted, adding a lengthy death scene from Antony and Cleopatra that Leone had chosen to cut. (Frayling’s verdict: “I adore Elizabeth McGovern, but she was not a Shakespearean actress.”) Warner Bros. has since taken this extra-extended cut out of circulation for unspecified legal reasons...

http://www.timeout.com/newyork/film/once-upon-a-time-in-america-restored

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:54 (twelve years ago)

how galling... "Let's put back shit the filmmaker didn't want in there and call it an extended cut."

saltwater incursion (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 21 November 2012 18:55 (twelve years ago)

three years pass...

Just ordered the "extended director's cut" from 2015 (251 minutes), which is available on Blu-Ray at Amazon for $7.88.

Jazzbo, Wednesday, 2 November 2016 15:11 (eight years ago)

two years pass...

Well I'm going for the endurance test 251 minute version at a screening in a couple of weeks. Will there be an intermission, is what I wonder.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 July 2019 21:12 (six years ago)

Is this the same long version that's been available for a while, or a new, new restoration?

Josh in Chicago, Tuesday, 30 July 2019 21:15 (six years ago)

have you seen the matrix yet ned? (it's rubbish too)

mark s, Tuesday, 30 July 2019 21:22 (six years ago)

xpost Appears to be the one talked about a few comments back by Morbs (McGovern is mentioned in the announcement for the screening).

In re mark s's question, never did, no. I am more kindly disposed to Reeves now, granted.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 30 July 2019 22:44 (six years ago)

five years pass...

Excellent film. The themes of failure from young beginnings are the good themes. The phone ringing scene is brilliant and ofc really stretches the nerve endings, and is one of many bizarre scenes in what you'd think is a Godfather rip. But its much better.

It should be longer. That last hour feels like its compressing a lot. I read in the wiki this might've been two films (3 hrs each) and it feels like a lot of holes appear in a rush to finish, weirdly needs more. Which is fine, I was never bored.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 16 September 2024 08:20 (one year ago)

Getting one of the gangsters to play the Morricine theme tune on the panpipes was so fkn funny.

xyzzzz__, Monday, 16 September 2024 08:25 (one year ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.