GENERAL ADMIN THREAD

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
This is a thread for you to ask questions, request deletions, complain, moan or bitch to your poor moderators. So you don't have to do it on other threads.

ILM Moderators, Wednesday, 23 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

cAn you provide a link to an online dictionary so we can look up the words Momus uses?

Mike Hanley, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

keep that handsome owner out of sight, he's distracting the female employees.

ethan, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

At last an easy request. (Or here if you wanna pay.)

Josh, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

MY HERO!

Mike Hanley, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I may just be too dumb to figure it out, but is there a way to search all the posts by keyword,poster etc?

marianna maclean, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

No, unfortunately, there's not. Incidentally if anyone knows of a better BBS hosting service than Greenspun, it's something I'm certainly considering. Maybe even one with - gasp *choke* - membership functions....

Tom, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

in the interim...

my own, admittedly meagre, suggestion, is for people not to respond to confrontational or aggressive posts, most of which are very obviously intended to wind people up. not saying its not easy, i've responded to these kind of posts, and regretted it, because it just prolonged it. maybe if people continue the thread, ignoring the aggressive posts, then it won't descend into the slanging thats spoiled a few threads. don't know if anyone agrees, just a suggestion

gareth, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

What gareth said. I have been too too guilty of this recently, because such people get so fucking annoying in the long run -- most trolls are short term annoyances but there are a couple of utter black marks on humanity that simply won't go away so it gets pretty frustrating. But it is probably best just to ignore 'em because they seem to get turned on by any kind of response.

Nicole, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Oh, Trolls are a part of the magical kingdom that is the internet. Remeber, they only can hurt you if you let them. Its obvious when someone deosn't really care about music and is just trying to be mischevious

Mike Hanley, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Mischief can be fun though. It depends on who's playing at it. Right Mike?

Nicole, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I confess to trolling on this really stupid video game forum. I cound't resist. They are such asses. www.shoryuken.com

Mike Hanley, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

I have a suggestion, how about we just block Doompatrol?

I know that the obvious solution is just not to respond to these people, but that can be really difficult when you're hot-tempered. When certain people have proved that they do *nothing* but start fights and incite flamewars, can't we do something to protect ourselves?

masonic boom, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

that's o.k. no need to block, very bored with all of this. you are the weakest link, goodbye.

paul, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

The thing is, Paul has actually made some normal posts, and not everything he posts immediately qualifies for deletion. He can mumble on about being censored and such, but I really am attempting to give him the benefit of the doubt so that he has the opportunity to not be a complete cretin, because I think unwarranted censorship is bad too, and he still has the opportunity to make a positive contribution. Despite the recent thing between neuromancer/'heybuddy' and Ally, which both of them really should just stop adding to, heybuddy has actually gone from making almost solely the kind of posts that made me want to ban him, to actually contributing in his own positive way to the message board.

Josh, Thursday, 24 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-five years ago)

Of course, this is a matter of perspective too. What one person considers valuable another person could consider worthless, which is what makes the deletion of postings, etc. so tricky.

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

which is why, i'm hoping, non response to antagonism will negate the need for deletions.

gareth, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm lacking the ability to see the point in rules at all lately, but for interest of the discussion:

Gareth's got it. If you feel someone is trying to inflame you, just ignore them, reply to someone else on the thread like the person isn't even there. I've been doing that to someone I find completely annoying lately, by and large, and lo and behold I'm not finding him annoying anymore.

Ally, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

That is *VERY* difficult when the person in question continues to dog at your feet, begging for attention, and when you refuse to give it to them, they resort to more and more personal attacks against you, personally, your band, your life, and everything else.

I am not a saint. I do not have a lot of patience. I do not suffer fools well. I *know* in my head that the way to discourage these people is to ignore them, but that is very difficult when they personally attack what they know is your weakest defense. I am a bad pacifist- there are only so many times that I can be (metaphorically) kicked in the head before I will respond with the same vitriol that is directed at me.

This is hardly the first time I've come up across some asshole on the web- it happens on nearly a weekly basis across various forums. If you are outspoken and opinionated and have a high profile, people will attack you, going "Ooh, look, I'm so tough, going up against Kate St.Claire". It goes with the territory, and I am tough enough to be used to it.

But I find it *very* difficult when the attacks go from being against your opinions and ideas, to being personal attacks against yourself. You try to make a point or an argument, and they respond with an insult. That, to me, is when it starts to violate the internet "Geneva Convention".

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Paul, here's some advice if you feel you are being censored or harrassed (and keep in mind I have no clue what the hell any of you are talking about at this second - apparently this vast censorship came before I could read the stuff in question!): be the bigger person and stop talking about it. Move on. If you're serious and you aren't trolling or trying to harrass, then why have the attitude of "You attack me, I'll attack you"? Just stop, it's pretty easy to do. After a while the back and forth stops being personally funny and everyone involved just gets annoyed, and once you feel that you gotta move on, ya know?

Ally, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it's funny ally, tom, talked about, not being afraid to look ridiculous. I'm not afraid of looking ridiculous. I love music.

Suppose your right. Sometimes, the emotions that I feel for music, so big, can't barely contain it. But I'm moving on....

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Unbelievable. It's like saying the Devil's name and he appears...

This is the last time I will argue with you, Paul.

1) When did I attack you? Someone asked a question about the Strokes, and I answered with my opinion. I *really* don't like them. Then you went apeshit on me. Some people seem unable to grasp the concept that one can disagree with an *opinion* without disrespecting the person involved. I DISAGREED with you. I did not attack you. The attack was yours.

2) Upon reading other threads you were involved with, I realised that you go out of your way to attract attention, negative or positive, and quickly stopped responding to you. I was having a conversation with Scott P. as your posts got ruder and more frequent. When you realised we weren't paying attention to you, that's when you started insulting and attacking me. This thread is me *complaining* about your attacks, not a personal attack. You seem unable to grasp the idea that you have done anything wrong.

3) What does me, or my band, or your personal opinions about me being a "scenester" have to do with any of the questions we were discussing? How does insulting me personally, or my band, either advance your argument, or do anything except piss me off? Wow, that's a way to win friends, influence people, and get them to respond to your questions/posts.

4) I do not have admin priviliges, and I cannot block you. But as far as I am concerned from now on, YOU. DO. NOT. EXIST. That's right. Bang on all you like, I've given you enough attention, there is no longer ANYTHING you can do or say to make me respond to you. Now fuck off back to your hole.

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

must respond to this...

I really don't like attention, believe or not, I don't. I am honest, however and my opinion, negative or positive, piss people off. What I don't like and what I term negative scenester head is thus:

NSH (Negative scenester heads) sit a back table at any club, darkened, of course and you hear snickering coming from the table as they loudly discuss how much they hate music. They invariable are all in bands, that are mediocre or alright but they pretend that they are rock and roll stars. Other bands will come up and say hello and what not and then when they leave NSH's will immediately tell everyone how much they hate that band, after, schmoozing with said band.

But the worse, is when they take the piss out of any geek or freak that comes to the show. Cause really that is what rock and roll is there for. The geeks and freaks who go to teh show, not looking the coolest, but just going cause they love music.

NSH's will take the piss out of those people, becuase, they love music or because they idolize singers/musicians. In NSH world that is a crime to do either. I have heard amazing beautiful stories about geeks and freaks and ordinary folk (like me) coming up to singers/songwriters and telling the singer/songwriter how much they have changed their lives. That is what music is about.

You were not having a conversation about the strokes, in fact, you barely mentioned the music, on a music thread. There was no pros or cons, just negatives about how much no one should love such and such band.

I'm not on this life to make friends and schmooze. I'm here to speak my mind and to do it as honestly as I know how.

If you don't like me, I am not arsed. I have made many enemies out of NSH's and it never bothered me. I like to think I represent the ordinary people who love rock and roll. NSH's hate ordinary people but they don't realize how ordinary they actually are.

I love music and people, believe it or not. And nothing you will say, will ever make me stop and think, differently.

God bless the bellrays, the hives, primal scream, mahalia jackson and wichita recordings.

Paul.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I'm sorry. I know I shouldn't. But this leapt out at me.

this:

I love music, not the scene.

-=then=-

this:

I walked away after he played a blinding show with members of sloan, alan mcgee and various others in attendance.

this:

I love music, not the scene.

-=then=-

this:

I walked away after he played a blinding show with members of sloan, alan mcgee and various others in attendance.

this:

I love music, not the scene.

-=then=-

this:

I walked away after he played a blinding show with members of sloan, alan mcgee and various others in attendance.

heed ye

There is something of a kontradiction there, no?

kiss kiss

/<-r/-\/>-31337, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

see, you are a NSH head. just saying, that, the constantines, it was cool cause I saw them come up, just on real music...that was the point of it all. sloan hate me. see it's so negative. how come?

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

what I was trying to impress with in that thread, is that, I knew the band, they are keeping it real, not selling out, not being NSH's and it's still taking them places, they are all in their early twenties and things are happening for them without the hype. It's on the strength of the music and he's still kept it real. That to me is impressive. Watching a band work on pure talent, not being a NSH. Alan Mcgee is a friend of mine and I don't really count him as part of the scene. I forget too. But glad you are keeping watch Norman.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

it's draining having to deal with NSH's. The cynicism of it all. It's just sad, suppose.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

the point is proven with norman's response in spades.

you cant post on here becuase if you love rock and roll you are ridiculous.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i accept all contradictions, cause if you aint got that figured out, norman, life is a contradiction. kiss kiss back to you, baby.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Are there posts getting deleted or are you just going on and on and on nonstop?

Ally, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

freedom of speech, baby. deal.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Freedom of speech won't feed my children.

But then I remember I don't have any kids and that Nicky Wire should be spanked, preferably by a robot. Rice-a-roni anyone?

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Freeedom of speech can feed the kids if you win a lawsuit. Have a robot lawyer.

Mike Hanley, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Oh, I volunteer to spank Nicky Wire! But first he must paint my toenails! Will this robot produce nail varnish in punke rocke colours as well as Orange Julius? Market this concept, take out infomercial ads starring ex-actors from Law & Order! ;-)

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think there should be a sort of punk rock robot sort of like Robocop that would kick the asses of Nicky Wire and his crew, and could also do other useful functions like nails and hair.As well as serving orange julius, it could even be programmed to discuss kitsch formalism.

I don't know about Law & Order, but I think maybe Burt Reynolds or Gary Coleman could do the infomercial. My heart says Ken Berry, but I should be pragmatic about this!

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Momus Roboticus? Now you're talking!!! How about we just have a punk rock spanking robot that goes around punnishing evil bands? This is turning into Jem and the Holograms or something...

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I don't know...it still needs a codename. How bout:

J Japanoise O Oscillating S Schizophonic H Hitman

The JOSH unit would roam the land, fighting for pop justice. JOSH could rock too, and has a built-in moog. Christina Aguilera would be involved somehow, because she looks like an twisted robot synthesis of Jem and Cher.

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Dude, I totally missed the Nicky Wire conversation. Fuck all ya'alls. Fuck Nicky Wire too. I don't want him touching my toes, where's Richey?

Ally, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Please don't tell Momus about me. I am afraid he will make me play on his next record.

JOSH, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Fuck Nicky Wire too. I don't want him touching my toes, where's Richey?

They should build a robot Richey to replace the real one. But the rest of the band would get so jealous of his good looks that Nicky would accuse robots of being corporate and evil and would send him to the scrap heap.

Nicole, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

All hail, JOSH!!! Robot in disguise!!! Ah, Saturday morning cartoons await...

More likely Nick will try to use JOSH for vaccuuming, tho... (not that JOSH sucks or anything... mwah hah ha, courtest of my boy, making sarccy comments in the background)

masonic boom, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Come on now, give it a rest, yeah?

DG, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

ok, then the truth is, I'm really just applying for a job as kate st.clair's publicist. So now you know.

paul, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Jesus, Paul, why don't you just admit you're sweet on Kate and stop trying to pull her pigtails? I believe there was some discussion on spanking Nicky Wire that was quite delicious, more please.

Mademoiselle Kitty, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

i must say i've thought quite the same thing about paul/doompatrol. i've not seen such persistant teasing outside of a playground crush in quite a long time. aww.

ethan, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I've deleted all posts in this thread that are gratuitously abusive to other posters, so some of the posts above might not make sense to people reading this now.

I would recommend ignoring all designed-to-annoy posts, even (*especially*) personal attacks.

Patrick, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

A kind of response to marianne, upthread:
There's search functionality of a kind with Google, which has started putting ILM threads into its database. It will probably only work with older threads, but ones as new as one month old are already in the DB. A kludge, but it may be helpful. In the meantime, watch yer step all, you're being monitored by the search engines! COURTNEY MAY COME TO KICK YER BUTTS.

Sean Carruthers, Friday, 25 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I would pay $89 billion US to get a robot Richey, thanks. Who is building it? A robot boyfriend would be so better than a real man, who needs to deal with them?

Ally, Saturday, 26 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Figures. A brilliant exchange like this (and the creation of the JOSH, an utterly necessary piece of equipment in these, our sad times), and I was in flight to SF during all of it.

Ned Raggett, Monday, 28 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Ah, Ned, but you missed what the "brilliant exchange" was in response to... for that, you should thank whatever lucky star you were blessed with being born under. ;-)

masonic boom, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I think Nabisco should bring out a breakfast cereal called 'Freedom of Speech' just to prove Nicky Wire wrong. They could even quote him in the adverts and go 'Duh!'.

Nick, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

I thought it was fairly funny! Music to kill for today: nothing, just Elridge Cleaver's Soul on Ice.

ty@hotmail.com, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Nick is my favorite person in the world right now. I am so tired and feel like crap and that made me laugh. I'm going to get one of those sequin-name-t-shirts but it'll say "NICK" instead of my own name, in honor.

Ally, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Yes, I am best. Thank you, Ally. I would get a sequined top made up with your name by way of return, but my sister is called Ally too and she might think it was weird. Also, I'm trying to de-camp my wardrobe at the moment. Pink Velvet slacks OUT. Twister jeans IN. Sequin tops would be a retrograde step.

Nick, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

You could always get a reni hat that has "Down with mixtapes" embroidered on it. That wouldn't be camp. ;-)

Nicole, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Not at all. Now if it was a sailor hat embroidered with that, it'd be another story, but also infinitely more awesome.

Me and Ian went to Bourbon Street on Sunday night and there were NOTHING but sailors there. It was so bizarre. I was all, next time I'm calling ahead of time to make sure it's not sailor night.

Ally, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, you don't understand, Nicole. I wouldn't want the word on my hat at all, even if it had quotation marks around it to make it clear that I was objecting to the word and not the concept. It would have to read 'Up with compilation tapes and also "compilation tapes"!'.

But that would be a bit shit, too.

Nick, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

No, just claim to be one of the McCartney children and all of a sudden all of the fashion editors would be putting "compilation tape!" hats on the cover of their magazines.

Nicole, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

RISE ROBOT LOVERS, RISE!!!

Mike Hanley, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

If the stories of off-stage behaviour on the various Beatles tours are true, more of us than you imagine may well *be* McCartney's children. "Satyricon," muttered Lennon, years later.

mark s, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Hate to burst yr ego bubble, Nick, but judging by the track record of children's cereal, "Freedom Of Speech" would by all odds indeed bring heart disease.

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

...in which case a healthy-living mother could indeed proclaim "'Freedom of Speech' won't feed my children!"

Sterling Clover, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

Those damned hippies, always stealing Nicky's lyrics.

Ally, Tuesday, 29 May 2001 00:00 (twenty-four years ago)

two years pass...
I was just checking to see if there was a shouting for the moderator thread on ILM, since I can't post to ILE. And the answer is that there is.

I'm going to take the general stance of simply ignoring Calum's very existence, even if he does resort to general offensiveness of the level that he descended to the Lauren Laverne thread.

However, if I really need to ask for some moderation, I'm going to do it here. Just to let you know. OK? Thanks.

kate, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a very odd thread. It kinda hurts to read it in places.

But I guess it's good to remind ourselves occasionally "this too will pass".

kate, Wednesday, 4 June 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)

SOmeone is posting blatantly pornographic pictures spamming this thread:

Don't think. What are you thinking right now?

And this one:

Does ILM need a FAQ?

Some of us read this at work, remember?

Please remove them.

kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:28 (twenty-two years ago)

and this one:

Manitoba ICA Friday night - anyone going?

kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:31 (twenty-two years ago)

Now also the kids singing thread. And probably more soon.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Hello? Moderators? Anyone? Can someone please cross post this to the ILE moderator thread for me?

kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:40 (twenty-two years ago)

ile-based moderators maybe not at work alerted, and i've deleted three so far (despite being at work) (everyone in the office is currently at lunch)

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Cheers mark.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:44 (twenty-two years ago)

Thank you mucho, Mark. My computer crashed almost immediately after I posted that so I didn't see yer response.

kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 11:54 (twenty-two years ago)

The Jarv/Spooner thread has been tubgirled.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Thursday, 5 June 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)

Repeat: are these all coming from the same IP address, and ifso, can we please block it? Because this makes Blog View IMPOSSIBLE to operate safely from work.

kate, Thursday, 5 June 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

I noticed that there is an option on the Settings page to Hide Images. This seems like it would be the ideal solution to this problem except for one thing - it doesn't seem to work. I checked the box, but I still see images. Would it be possible to fix this option so that it actually blocks images? That would be perfect for us work-surfers.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 5 June 2003 13:35 (twenty-two years ago)

the hide images thing works well but isn't infallible. nate, I can see you definitely have that option selected. Do you still see the following as an embedded image:

http://www.sonic.net/~playland/img/it.gif

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:00 (twenty-two years ago)

When I look at it from within the thread, it shows up as a link. But if I select Blog View, I still see it as an image.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:19 (twenty-two years ago)

aha! I hadn't thought of that. I will have a quick bash at that...

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Cool - thanks a lot.

o. nate (onate), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

hurray - done that for newanswers blog, i'll add it to newquestions blog at a later stage.

Alan (Alan), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:53 (twenty-two years ago)

I would still like a JOSH unit.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 5 June 2003 15:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Excellent, Alan!

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 5 June 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)

[Youd think that would hurt, you know streching your anus that wide but maybe he likes it, who knows.]

goatse.cx, Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:07 (twenty-two years ago)

[Changing your name won't help you poxy FULE!]

kjh, Thursday, 5 June 2003 19:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I locked the pathetic little fite btw Blount and Calum.

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 5 June 2003 21:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh come on. I got some pretty pictures up and ready.

(I'm not really sure if this is a reason to unlock the thread though.)

Sommermute (Wintermute), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:02 (twenty-two years ago)

I actually invited a mod to lock it yesterday, but no dice

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:03 (twenty-two years ago)

It got boring

Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:10 (twenty-two years ago)

like ER

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:24 (twenty-two years ago)

i propose if that particular fite starts up again, on its own thread or invading others, it just be deleted thread by thread, post by post

the point's been made: calum is claiming his computer's been invaded by a hostile ilxor and believes it's blount, blount doesn't care what calum believes, escalate towards infantile tedium

mark s (mark s), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

for my part I'll just take my own advice and respond to calum off-board via the wonder of e-mail, and general apologies all around for my part in this matter.

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd also like to apologize to Maura Tierney for my ER comment

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 5 June 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

am i to take it that IP 216.127.82.98 is being an arse?

Alan (Alan), Friday, 6 June 2003 08:19 (twenty-two years ago)

choice in pics posted strongly suggests that IP 216.127.82.98 was our tubgirl-posting friend from yesterday, alan

mark s (mark s), Friday, 6 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)

drop me a line if it springs up again, obv

Alan (Alan), Friday, 6 June 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

four months pass...
I asked this burning question today, and it never showed up on the board.

Boo hoo hoo!

Buffalo Mozzarella, Tuesday, 21 October 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

Oh, duh!

As usual, my own, special, unique problem is the same problem everyone else is dealing with.

Buffalo Mozzarella, Tuesday, 21 October 2003 17:12 (twenty-two years ago)

four years pass...

classic material

banriquit, Sunday, 22 June 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

looooool @ Buffalo Mozzarella

J0rdan S., Sunday, 22 June 2008 20:19 (seventeen years ago)

NSH (Negative scenester heads)

^^ could be a meme in fall '08

banriquit, Sunday, 22 June 2008 20:21 (seventeen years ago)

four years pass...

My internet security has blocked ilxor (specifically I Love Music) a couple of times today. This has never happened in years of using the site (it's my homepage so it appears every time I use the internet). Should I be worried?

djh, Monday, 1 October 2012 19:29 (thirteen years ago)

Occasionally old image hotlinks will show up later in malware alerts. Can you say which threads are causing problems and if you're getting malware messages?

Death Grits 2 (WmC), Monday, 1 October 2012 19:42 (thirteen years ago)

Thanks.

I think it was on the I Love Music home page. Will make a note of the details/message if it happens again.

djh, Monday, 1 October 2012 19:49 (thirteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.