The State of Hip-Hop

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So I've been thinking about the legitimacy of the Source's Hip-Hop State of Emergency Summit (and the accompanying issue of the mag) when considering the international-non-story story of that Times Square MTV freestyling fracas on Monday, which I witnessed first-hand. Here in NYC it led the news as "RAP RIOT IN TIMES SQUARE" as if the kids were out busting heads to get a record deal when it was really just storeowners pissed about the crowd (hello? yr in Times Square!!!) and the cops wanting to disperse the kids but them having nowhere to go since MTV wasn't ready to open its doors. Much ado about nada, but of course EVERY news outlet runs the story, just to reaffirm what half of America already thinks: DON'T TRUST BLACK PEOPLE WITH RHYMING SKILLZ!

The new issue of the Source (which I'm still picking my way through) and the summit were basically an attack on the media's alleged hatred of hip-hop (Bill O'Reilly in particular), and the perceived notion that the media wants to take it down. This is hyperbole, as glossies make loads from hip-hop stories. Yes, pieces often focus on the sensational (50 Cent, R. Kelly), but it's the same with any topic. And the labels have major culpability in this, pushing someone like 50 Cent so hard when it's obvious that many people will object to him and will only have their fears confirmed by his bullet-ridden rhymes, diminishing hip-hop's longterm appeal. I have more to say but I'd like to hear other thoughts first...

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm at work so I don't have much time to think/write about this, but:
I don't think people w/a severely limited understanding of hiphop (I'm looking at you, O'Reilly) should say any type of blanket statement against it, which will just lead to more negative misconceptions.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I thought the emergency was that Em had taken Benzino down hard.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:54 (twenty-two years ago)

I am setting myself up for a major smackdown, but love of bling killed hip-hop. like, six years ago.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Fortunately the O'Reilly types will start dying off in the next few decades.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)

(J0hn that was pretty OTM if you ask me, at least it is for mainstream hip-hop)

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 22:59 (twenty-two years ago)

in my experience around ilX0r anti-bling sentiments are often construed as not "getting it"

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I think I 'get' mindless crap pretty well.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)

I think the problem with the "dominance" of bling is that a lot of artists lyrically go about it the same way, so it all starts to sound the same and the only differentiators lie in the sonics.

Fortunately, I've always been more into the sonics of all music over the lyrics, so it doesn't bother me that much.

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:10 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah, I also listen to hip hop for the sonics not the lyrics. However, if the lyrics or truly grating it tends to prevent me from trying to appreciate the sonics. Plus, I don't like the textures that most bling hop uses--too digital meguesses

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:15 (twenty-two years ago)

'lyrics ARE truly gratin'

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:20 (twenty-two years ago)

in my experience, people who signify a certain facet of music/lyrics/culture with the word "bling" are fools who know and care not of what they speak. I saw an article recently with a headline about "rejoicing in the demise of bling", and it sounded like some Asian dictator had been taken down.

so yeah, can we try and have this conversation without resorting to such obnoxious shorthand?

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Doesn't this happen every three years?

And good god - if I was going to taken down for hating bling, it wouldn't be here.

But I listen to hip hop for the sonics not the lyrics, so no matter.

jillian (jillian), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

one of the interesting things about ilm is that none of the "haters" of underground hip-hop (or whatever) are ever as blanket or vehement as their opposites

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

Al, do you prefer that I pontificate my obnoxiousness?

Can we not use any classifications here because they are shorthands and too convenient?

In that case, it's going to be a very, very, very, very long thread.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)

in my experience, people who signify a certain facet of music/lyrics/culture with the word "bling" are fools who know and care not of what they speak.

Well, Al, you're wrong. I've loved hip-hop since 1985. And I think hip-hop that spends lots of time talking about brand-name clothes and money is boring.

The Evil Dictator Bling will no longer terrorize the citizens of Bootyteria! Power to the people!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)

i guess you're not referring to me, jess, since i evaluate crap on a turd by turd basis.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:31 (twenty-two years ago)

rock was dead in 1968, too. [yawn]

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree w/John really, hip-hop's gotten - kinda like indie-rock - into this really hyper-stratification with not much interesting going on on any of the levels. There's bright spots sure, but overall its overrun with crap. The spectrum is crammed chock-full of apologists for completely transparent (and I would say indefensible) greed and consumerism, and on the other hand a bunch of humorless die-hard experimentalists and backpackers writing themselves in to a corner...

But I do find the assertion that mainstream America is trying to kill hip-hop is beyond ludicrous - it's absorbing it, but it doesn't want to kill it. It wants to transform it into something more easily manageable and marketable.

Shakey Mo Collier, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:34 (twenty-two years ago)

"wants to"?!?! if hip-hop were any easier to market and commodify it would be, oh i dunno, the dominant pop-music style in the country today or something, and we KNOW that isn't the case

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

"my names barney rubble/and i'm here to say/i love fruity pebbles in a major way"

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

jess wins

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)

Jess, to recall that lyric brings a tear to my eye.

I can't say bling, clothes, or the rapper's name is inherently boring because plenty of rappers have made me care about their bling, clothes and name. Just like "the love song" or "disco, baby, disco" it's just that so many are generic and tired.

Gender issues are wayyy fucked up these days too in rap, but the rest of the pop world ain't much better in that regard either.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:41 (twenty-two years ago)

jess i kiss you

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

(i was also gonna pull out the "super mario bros super rap" but maybe no need)

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:42 (twenty-two years ago)

[they were using rap on commercials in 1981, fer chrissake!]

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

I think "hyper-stratification" is sort of the opposite of what's happening in hip-hop, and though I'm as fascinated as anyone else by the differences between genres and sub-genres, and bling-undie (so-called?) dichotomies, I also find it increasingly difficult to stratify (is that a verb?) any of it. I think "hyper-stratification" exists more in publications like the 'Source' than it does in the music itself.

s woods, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:44 (twenty-two years ago)

...naturally the point isn't "it's impossible to write a good bling-bling song" -- that'd be ridiculous. Whether anybody who's writing about their clothes, cars, etc. is actually writing good songs, that's another matter. All the good writers could write plenty good bling-hop, this I don't doubt. Wanna say it again: I'm not saying the form's inherently bankrupt. Only that it hasn't produced much worth hearing. Yes, that includes Jay-Z's vapid clothing-brand namechecks.

*ducks*

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:46 (twenty-two years ago)

taking sides: chatting in unison about trousers and girls vs. chatting alone about watches and bitches

(nb: slighty altered crib from sfjones)

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:48 (twenty-two years ago)

I think "hyper-stratification" is sort of the opposite of what's happening in hip-hop, and though I'm as fascinated as anyone else by the differences between genres and sub-genres, and bling-undie (so-called?) dichotomies, I also find it increasingly difficult to stratify (is that a verb?) any of it.

Read that out loud for us.

jillian (jillian), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Does it really suck that bad?

s woods, Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:51 (twenty-two years ago)

the one thing i always find vaguely depressing about discussions like this on ilm (and i'm certainly guilty of fostering it) is that they devolve without fail (some quicker than others) into pissing contests, rather than trying to get at the heart of the matter: why does this material appeal to so many (leaving aside bullshit arguments like they're forcefed it)? why do we get off on violent/dangerous entertainment? why have we always? why are we so dishonest about it?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

"Well, Al, you're wrong. I've loved hip-hop since 1985. And I think hip-hop that spends lots of time talking about brand-name clothes and money is boring."

ok, I'm wrong. so did you start tuning out in '86 when "My Adidas" came out?

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:52 (twenty-two years ago)

as if on cue...

M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:54 (twenty-two years ago)

This post is dedicated to all of those hip-hop soldiers who have fallen in the last year and Murder Inc.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I think maybe he tuned out when Rakim answered w/ "Fila's are Dope"

Oh, wait, that type of shit didn't happen

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

::looks at Jess's post, then tries to stop pissing::

so, um, anyway...my question is: do you think they're sincere? that is to say, my problem with a lot of undie hip hop is that they're so certain about what they don't want to rap about (money, violence, etc.), but don't seem to know what they *do* want to rap about, and end up with fairly boring or abstract subject matter. at the very very least, at the bare minimum, you have to give most thug/player rappers this: they probably do care about their riches and their guns as much as they claim to in their rhymes (whether exact figures about their bank accounts and/or kill counts is grossly inflated therein is another matter entirely).

Al (sitcom), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:57 (twenty-two years ago)

i was hoping the thread would be about hip-hop's role and representation in mass media and how/if the recent crop of artists helped create that image... but whatever.

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Wednesday, 26 February 2003 23:58 (twenty-two years ago)

yancey you've been posting here this long and you still expect yr threads to stay on topic for more than a half dozen posts?

i can see al's point and i kind of agree with it: there's a certain, uh, visceralness missing from a lot of undie hip-hop which comes, at least partly, from the content. unless you get off the skills on display (which i do, sometimes, but too much and its steve vai, y'know) there's not much to glom onto...one of my favorite indie hiphop songs in the last few years was dead prez's "cop shot raptivism" and its precisely because its as much of a visceral, monodimensional cartoon as most bling-hop, just with a more, uh, "socially conscious" ( ha ha ) message...i've never gone to pop music to be reinforced on the joys of family and togetherness...i have the same problems with blackalicious as i do with "new morning" era dylan

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:02 (twenty-two years ago)

no i didn't expect it to. i'm just not sure how i feel about the hip-hop-mass-media dealio and was hoping someone else had been thinking about this. i'm not being bitchy, just giving it one last try!!!

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:05 (twenty-two years ago)

(for the record, music that's based on being anti-something invariably kills itself eventually, cause at some point you're either gonna lose or win the war, and in either case yr screwed)(which is why em needs a reinvention and why undie-hip-hop, a few artists excluded, bores me)

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:06 (twenty-two years ago)

(ha this is why i prefer there's a riot goin on and maggot brain to their respective counterparts and never really "got" curtis mayfield or marvin gaye i guess)

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:07 (twenty-two years ago)

stray thought: hip-hop's role/representation in mass media = modern athletes (esp basketball) role/representation in mass media

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:10 (twenty-two years ago)

we luv the talent/don't touch our daughters?

(the rise and fall of basketball's popularity = the rise and fall of black music's popularity since the mid-70s?)

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:12 (twenty-two years ago)

(you don't like Superfly Jess? I think it's better than Maggot Brain if not Riot--nothing on earth is better than Riot--and does just about the same things as both)

M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:13 (twenty-two years ago)

50 Cent: The Ron Artest Story

Chris Ryan (chrisryan), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:14 (twenty-two years ago)

(fan attendance at an average cleveland cavs game = total sales of last j5 album?)

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:15 (twenty-two years ago)

(i like superfly okay...by which i mean its pretty and catchy and good but ultimately i just feel affirmed not uplifted by it...riot does the same thing metal box and only a few other albums do for me)

baketball's always been a pretty good (if undernoticed) bellweather for what's on the minds/ears of hip young black kids, i think

i was mostly thinking that basically pro atheletes and rappers and the ultimate "cake and eat it too" types: they want their public profile, their endorsements, their beaucoup bucks, their franchises and multimedia (blah) deals, but they DONT want to be role models, to "preach", to basically own up to anything that a public persona seems to imply (to use, say, the model [and i do mean MODEL] of a politician, which is obv problematic to begin with)...and they're both loved/resented for these very things, often by the same demographic

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:17 (twenty-two years ago)

""wants to"?!?! if hip-hop were any easier to market and commodify it would be, oh i dunno, the dominant pop-music style in the country today or something, and we KNOW that isn't the case "

I think my sarcasm detector just blew up.

Of course mainstream America's already absorbed hip-hop, it's been it's major cultural engine for quite awhile now. But this is different than killing it, wouldn't you say...?

Shakey Mo Collier, Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:18 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, Al & oops, I concede, bling hip hop from Puff Daddy forward has produced dozens of mc's as good as Rakim or Run, it rules, great great stuff, it's really taken the genre to new artistic heights

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 27 February 2003 00:19 (twenty-two years ago)

which question is that?

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 28 February 2003 22:43 (twenty-two years ago)

"why violence?"

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 28 February 2003 22:52 (twenty-two years ago)

hoez, fules!

jess (dubplatestyle), Friday, 28 February 2003 22:53 (twenty-two years ago)

nelly video, barely.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 28 February 2003 22:56 (twenty-two years ago)

Here's the stock answer: The popularity of gangsta rap in the suburbs ([insert poignant statistic here]) proves that middle-class kids long for depictions (whether they be romanticized or brutal) of inner-city life. It's one of the few "others" left in our increasingly vanilla society. So it's escapism, much like, say Titanic was, but toward the seedy side rather than the mass-death side.

Of course the flip(mode)side is that gangsta rap is equally popular within inner-cities themselves, so in that case it's the fans' desire to see their own day-to-day lives (which, while more dangerous and violent, are no less mundane than everyone else's) depicted in an exciting way.

(nb: I'm not really sure that I believe this, just trying to get some sort of conversation rolling...)

Yanc3y (ystrickler), Friday, 28 February 2003 22:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I always thought the 'suburban white kids like gangsta becuz it's the other' argument was overplayed; I always thought it had more to do with sex, partying, violence, like a Bruckheimer flick with more liquor and drugs. I always laughed when I'd read about some critic talking about how some album was a bleak portrayal of the toils on inner city youth and they'd be talking about Doggystyle.

James Blount (James Blount), Friday, 28 February 2003 23:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i think part (or all) of the question might be "why do we like bruckheimer flicks" (which probably deserves its own thread).

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 28 February 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)

also, this. which i've been thinking about a lot and, yeah, did need more answers.

mitch lastnamewithheld (mitchlnw), Friday, 28 February 2003 23:29 (twenty-two years ago)

If suburban kids were attracted to the "other" they'd all be converting right now. John Walker Lindh to thread.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 1 March 2003 00:47 (twenty-two years ago)

when does the black music become part of white culture enough for the above to no longer be true. also, does mellow black music connote edginess to you or to the rich white kids you talk about?

20 -25 years sound about right? Jazz (as I'm narrowly defining it and with a great number of omissions) was very, very, very popular, yet still pretty underground as an art from at a space between 1910-1935. One of the big musical trends during the war was swing, which is a part of jazz -- a popularizing of an underground art from.

After that came blues which got melded and subdivided by into rock and r&b (which was also influenced by gospel and stuff) in the 50's. There's always been something new around the corner, and the underground of the previous generation becomes the mainstream act of the next.

To broaden the scope out of the Hip Hop discussion and back to rock, Punk (as we currently have problems defining on the Avril threads) started around the time that prog was blooming (1sr generation), and broke through with the hair bands (Nirvana).

Of course, by that logic something grand should be coming around any day now...

All this is generalizing obviously. My logic makes sense in my head, but what do I know. The original intent of that post back there was to address one of the reasons that this material appeal to so many. This is one of them.

jm (jtm), Saturday, 1 March 2003 04:29 (twenty-two years ago)

Hip Hop is fine. Leave it alone. Stop picking at it. Don't read The Source it is boring. Read back issues of Murder Dog instead.Rap music will live on despite you.Nothing you do or say can kill it.In fact,don't even listen to it because it doesn't need you.Listen to The Strokes,they love you.

Youbringthewoodpecker, Saturday, 1 March 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes. Bell rockage.

To post the thing I wanted to post before this thread became something else entirely: I think the only thing really "wrong" with hip-hop that wasn't all that "wrong" before, say, 1998 or so is the (widely media-dictated) stratification between mainstream and underground ("Fuck undies! I'm straight up free ballin'!") which wasn't as widespread as it was ten years ago when listening to (or having your magazine write feature articles on) both Dr. Dre and De La Soul wasn't all that out of the question despite the huge gulf in record sales between the two. Somehow the recent definitions of mainstream/underground have somehow placed popular yet non-"pop"-sounding acts in the "undie" category and therefore have done a lot to screw things up -- Jurassic 5 and Common are on MTV and get played in carbonated soft drink beverage commercials and probably sold more records than Benzino but a lot of people here and in other music enthusiast circles consider them "undie" without thinking.

As far as the violence thing, hip-hop has associated with violence for ages, at least since the Long Beach gang fight during the "Raising Hell" tour if not longer. Like most Reaganites, O'Reilly's just regurgitating bullshit from the '80s.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 1 March 2003 16:51 (twenty-two years ago)

"wasn't as widespread" = "was more widespread", actually. Fuk!

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 1 March 2003 16:53 (twenty-two years ago)

"To post the thing I wanted to post before this thread became something else entirely: I think the only thing really "wrong" with hip-hop that wasn't all that "wrong" before, say, 1998 or so is the (widely media-dictated) stratification between mainstream and underground ("Fuck undies! I'm straight up free ballin'!") which wasn't as widespread as it was ten years ago when listening to (or having your magazine write feature articles on) both Dr. Dre and De La Soul wasn't all that out of the question despite the huge gulf in record sales between the two. Somehow the recent definitions of mainstream/underground have somehow placed popular yet non-"pop"-sounding acts in the "undie" category and therefore have done a lot to screw things up -- Jurassic 5 and Common are on MTV and get played in carbonated soft drink beverage commercials and probably sold more records than Benzino but a lot of people here and in other music enthusiast circles consider them "undie" without thinking."

well said.

Al (sitcom), Saturday, 1 March 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

J5 and common's growth and success is thru their dropping of an oppositional stance: I wouldn't call common "undie" anymore, nor would most foax (tho they'd base it on taco-bell etc).

Probably a better idea would be "conscious" vs. "individualistic" -- rap as an end, or as a means to one. In that sense I side philisophically with the individualistic rappers, tho practically I find the conscious rappers more appealing in terms of attitude towards gender, violence, etc. However the way the conscious rappers start and leave it at attitude results in a dead end, while precisely because individualist rappers see rap as a road to something else they offer more of a posibility of its expansion. Common and J5 are pretty flowers, but dead ones.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 1 March 2003 21:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Having dropped their oppositional stance what they have left is simply an assertion of preference for a certain sonic template *in the abstract* -- i.e. with no normative justification for it.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 1 March 2003 21:14 (twenty-two years ago)

woah, I'm with the wanksta on this one! Though the "conscious" rappers need to listen to more James Brown/Public Enemy. More jokes, more undeniable grooves, more powerful vocal presence.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 1 March 2003 21:15 (twenty-two years ago)

less nice guy, more testify!

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 1 March 2003 21:17 (twenty-two years ago)

did I say taco-bell? I meant coke.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Saturday, 1 March 2003 21:18 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah Sterling, Taco Bell is part of the Pepsi empire! You could get shot for that kind of slip-up, man.

Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Saturday, 1 March 2003 23:37 (twenty-two years ago)

Common and J5 are pretty flowers, but dead ones.

Sterling, I love ya, but damn, that's more clever (and crit-typical) than it is true. And "oppositional"=Sean Combs? Opposed to what? You are telling me that Benzino="individualistic," whereas Common (whom some [wrongly] say have just made the After Bathing at Baxter's of hip-hop, who includes songs about trying and failing to pimp the music industry) is only just "conscious"?

Damn it, I'll say it again: you can place people in categories like this ONLY if you know what they're all about. Just because someone is aiming for chart hits, or used to deal drugs, does not mean that they are necessarily individualists, or that they have better beats.

And as for you, Anthony M., I don't think Eminem gets his sense of humor from J.B. OR P.E. (maybe Flav), nor do anyone else on the charts. I think Em's straight Beavis w/Kool G. Rap all the way...and I think his beats are flat. He dishonours the funk--but "Superman" is the greatest song to hit the radio in many a moon.

Neudonym, Sunday, 2 March 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

eleven months pass...
hahaha.. What a year it's been, etc.

Ah, how things have changed..

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 29 February 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

or have they?

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 29 February 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

yr just setting us up for a sequel thread!

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Sunday, 29 February 2004 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)

It's exactly one year later!!

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 29 February 2004 10:54 (twenty-one years ago)

(also, funny to bump into you Sterling; I'm listening to Da Unbreakables right now - it's fucking amazing. I don't know why I was lukewarm to it at first. It's really, really great)

Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 29 February 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Wow. What thoughtful thread.

Sym (shmuel), Sunday, 29 February 2004 12:16 (twenty-one years ago)

six years pass...

Want this taken srsly yall and I'm a complete HH neophyte so play nice

but I've been listening to some hip-hop from the year 2010 and liking it a LOT

am talking shit like Kno, Panacea, Kokayi

anyway, this stuff has barely been mentioned once if at all on ILM, which seems an oversight for a board with a lot of hip-hop fans

kinda bummed I hadn't heard the latter two earlier otherwise I might have nominated their albums for the '10 poll - at least Kno got in there (certainly the best of the three, I'd say)

am wondering whether it'd be worth starting an alternative rolling 2011 hip-hop thread for the more obscure (NOT 'indie' ffs) stuff which the swag cru for all their <3ly natures and discerning tastes don't rly get around to talking about

want yr opinions plz :)

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 05:49 (fourteen years ago)

swag cru posts losts of obscure stuff. if you actually DO mean indie/undie/backpacker/art-rap shit i wouldn't mind a thread to post about that shit. But doubt you could actually pull it off without a bunch of sub-ethans running in there every day to make fun, tbh

anyway, I like Nocando

our man flint flo$$y (Whiney G. Weingarten), Monday, 3 January 2011 05:53 (fourteen years ago)

swag cru posts losts of obscure stuff

Oh, I'm sure! But I postsearched all of the above artists and Drugs A. Money mentioned Kno in a list of 25, the others nada. Only going by what I've seen. And they're not necessarily indie/undie/backpacker/art-rap (although...maybe sorta? Don't like drawing the distinction rly, it's all beats, samples, synths and flow, just done differently). Deej can do his worst, tbcfh.

Nocando, huh? Will check, sounds familiar - probably guested on something I like

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 05:56 (fourteen years ago)

listened to the panacea remix album a good bit last year, "the re-route", three good tracks & a boring mc iirc

zvookster, Monday, 3 January 2011 05:57 (fourteen years ago)

year before last now, i guess - 2009

zvookster, Monday, 3 January 2011 05:57 (fourteen years ago)

lj post about it in the rolling threads! this year it is 'gun sounds'. we all like different sounds and recommend things to each other and everyone would be cool with another contributor who likes another alternative sound. just don't get all tmi lj style.

irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:00 (fourteen years ago)

cool but if folks start accusing me of not being troo kvlt or w/e then I'll be wasting my type y'know

also am not much of a mainstream rap bro, hope that's cool. the big boi album was good.

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:02 (fourteen years ago)

what is the kno solo?

zvookster, Monday, 3 January 2011 06:02 (fourteen years ago)

thats totally cool. likes of helgeson aren't mainstream rap bros, get along just fine. in fact people are more likely to recommend stuff directly to those who aren't just mainstream rap bros as their tastes are more obvious.

irish xmas caek, get that marzipan inta ya (a hoy hoy), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:04 (fourteen years ago)

Death Is Silent, fucking brilliant - rly high on Rateyourmusic's 2010 overall list in fact. Say what you want about those guys but lots of 'em have taste - I think it's a valuable resource (although I found out about Kno's album from my brother)

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:05 (fourteen years ago)

listening to "La Petite Mort" now (lol lj typecast) not my thing at all i gotta say

zvookster, Monday, 3 January 2011 06:07 (fourteen years ago)

that ain't the best track but fair fucks

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:09 (fourteen years ago)

tbh i don't know any of the ppl mentioned in the op :(

tears of a self-clowning oven (The Reverend), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:16 (fourteen years ago)

err in the revive

tears of a self-clowning oven (The Reverend), Monday, 3 January 2011 06:16 (fourteen years ago)

kno was in undie stars cunninlynguists - they had 'seasons' with masta ace, a nice back in the days type jam complete with premo style hook

zvookster, Monday, 3 January 2011 06:22 (fourteen years ago)

just post it in the swag thread & explain why u like it convincingly

i dont really know any of those artists except kno, id probably fuck w/ him ahead of anyone else in 'cunninlynguists' but i would rely on u to hook me up w/ youtubes & explanations for why that shit is worth my time

doing a separate thread tho is dumb imho

ich bin ein ilxor (deej), Monday, 3 January 2011 07:09 (fourteen years ago)

what deej said

tears of a self-clowning oven (The Reverend), Monday, 3 January 2011 07:11 (fourteen years ago)

talking of the gun sounds thread, how the hell have you got to 181 new answers already

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 3 January 2011 09:17 (fourteen years ago)

bitching about the thread title, duh

J0rdan S., Monday, 3 January 2011 09:19 (fourteen years ago)

oh god

lex diamonds (lex pretend), Monday, 3 January 2011 09:21 (fourteen years ago)

Kokayi

He's the DC rapper who's been around for quite awhile, right?

curmudgeon, Monday, 3 January 2011 15:43 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, dude's been around long enough to feature his own son on the new record

Boo Radely and the Super Fury Aminal (acoleuthic), Monday, 3 January 2011 15:44 (fourteen years ago)

two years pass...

http://www.theonion.com/articles/there-are-people-in-world-who-are-concerned-about,32162/

huun huurt 2 (Hurting 2), Tuesday, 23 April 2013 01:52 (twelve years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.