― robin (robin), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:11 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 12:51 (twenty-two years ago)
And in response to the thread title: if it shakes ya ass, it shakes ya ass.
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Bobby D Gray (bedhead), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
It's worth noting that the song doesn't exactly *need* JT for it to work, although I think there's a very savvy connection between what the song is trying to do and what JT represents. It's all about the guitar in the chorus, ultimately.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)
(* heard it at 4am @ Fu - dancefloor-friendly undie as opposed to chZZZGfucjkeat star wars stuff, probably)
― Ess Kay (esskay), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 00:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:41 (twenty-two years ago)
"positive" != "undie".
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:46 (twenty-two years ago)
Eminem - "Sing for the Moment": C/D?
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 02:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 10:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dom Passantino (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 12 June 2003 11:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Friday, 13 June 2003 00:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 13 June 2003 00:33 (twenty-two years ago)
& Is it okay to still like the Neptunes if a cheesy pop star is singing over their tracks?
Even if he tries to beatbox?
― truant (truant), Friday, 13 June 2003 00:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Friday, 13 June 2003 00:38 (twenty-two years ago)
neither,i'm suggesting that the black eyed peas released a mediocre backpacker hip hop track that would have sunk into obscurity,but instead people give it more attention than it deserves cause justin timberlake is on it
― robin (robin), Friday, 13 June 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)
robin i fucking DARE you to find me a track from any prototypical backpacker group that sounds near as exhilerating, near as contradicted and happysad, and to be honest i dare you to find me any modern group but the blackeyedpeas (and i guess sorta that wyclef-brokered wannafugees that did what would you do) that draws so much from the POSITIVE aspect of the native tongues tradition.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 13 June 2003 04:36 (twenty-two years ago)
What "Where Is The Love" demonstrates, I think, is that the key to conjuring up a return to the "golden age" is not the pop world taking notice of backpacker groups, but backpacker groups taking notice of pop. On both a what it does (sonically) level and what it means (contextually) level, getting Justin Timberlake or an equivalent to guest is so duh-obvious-but-great that it's amazing no-one else is doing it.
"What Would You Do" is a good reference point, but I always found that comparatively hackneyed and forced, like they were trying to fuse the two sides of the coin together but didn't know where the joins were.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 13 June 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 13 June 2003 07:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Friday, 13 June 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)
*I so agree with Miccio about this term, and "panty rap" is a genre I'd like to have a hand in creating
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 13 June 2003 12:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Friday, 13 June 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 13 June 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― chaki (chaki), Friday, 13 June 2003 15:05 (twenty-two years ago)
q.e.d.
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Friday, 13 June 2003 15:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 13 June 2003 16:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Friday, 13 June 2003 23:24 (twenty-two years ago)
For at least five minutes I was convinced Sterling meant Nate Dogg.
― Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Saturday, 14 June 2003 00:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Saturday, 14 June 2003 06:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:24 (twenty-two years ago)
http://www.hemisphere.nl/plaatjes/710522.jpg
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Saturday, 14 June 2003 12:27 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nate Patrin (Nate Patrin), Sunday, 15 June 2003 03:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― oops (Oops), Sunday, 15 June 2003 20:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― robin (robin), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 03:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 03:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― unknown or illegal user (doorag), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 04:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 04:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― unknown or illegal user (doorag), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 04:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― unknown or illegal user (doorag), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 04:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― trife (simon_tr), Tuesday, 1 July 2003 04:57 (twenty-two years ago)