Eminem - "Sing for the Moment": C/D?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I noticed the other day that I can't listen to "Dream On" anymore without shouting "Come on!" and "Sing it!" during the chorus.

So, the lyrics: A discourse on stardom, hiphop, fans, and their effect on each other. If there's some kind of message, it doesn't hold together very well; it's not nearly as good a song in retrospect. I do like the guitar solo, though.

you ignoramus

My name is Kenny (My name is Kenny), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 21:46 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm pathetic, every time I hear a song like this one it just makes me want to go out and buy the original. The first couple of times I heard it I thought it was all right, even fun; now the drums just bother the shit out of me. Sounds like it was mixed by a drunk.

Millar (Millar), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it's awful.

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:13 (twenty-two years ago)

I like The Eminem Show, but I've hated this song since I heard it. Though I hate it less now than I did before. The sampling/chorus is awful, but the verses are decent.

It just doesn't work though.

adam west (adamwest), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Remind me why Eminem sampling Aerosmith makes any sense AT ALL

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:25 (twenty-two years ago)

kind of a 'so bad its good' thing for me

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:33 (twenty-two years ago)

It. Sounds. Like. "Oliver". "Twist". By. Luke. Haines.

Lynskey (Lynskey), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:48 (twenty-two years ago)

more of a "so bad I hate it" for me

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Tuesday, 10 June 2003 22:55 (twenty-two years ago)

what john said. there are a few moments of inspiration but they aren't strung together meaningfully. he's getting lazy, writing rhymes out of the vestiges of his "vibe" interviews.

amateurist (amateurist), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:18 (twenty-two years ago)

so is it ok to like undie rap if there's a pop star singing the chorus?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 01:48 (twenty-two years ago)

One of my least favorite rappers sampling one of my least favorite rock groups. Classic!

Famous Athlete, Wednesday, 11 June 2003 02:07 (twenty-two years ago)

This song is so embarrassing, it makes me feel like my skin is on too tight. Ugh. And I really lik Aerosmith. And Eminem.

flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 03:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Erm, not only do I lik Aerosmith. I also likE them. Just so you know.

Rare instance of the sum being less than its parts.

flightsatdusk (flightsatdusk), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 03:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I've never heard the Aerosmith track. I think the Eminem one is OK but a dreadful choice of single.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)

I never liked the aerosmith song much even when I listened to the classic rock station as a teenager, and as I listened to it less and less I grew to hate the song. so I hate hearing it in the eminem song even though I like eminem. it seems important to me that so much of the original was retained. like vocalizing a previously submerged similarity between audiences. perhaps in ten or twenty years I'll hate eminem in ways just like I hate that aerosmith song. this is intimately tied up somehow with my wanting to distance myself from classic rock and the classic rock audience as I prejudicially conceive of it.

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)

(think of construction workers, boorish radio djs, hick high school students, stupid people, tasteless people)

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:52 (twenty-two years ago)

since i've never heard abt the aerosmith track there's nothing for me to hate.

I've heard half of the tracks from the eminem show and this was by far the best one. I want others to come back and explain why it was so dreadful.

I do like the verses to this. the 'come on' and 'sing it' could be corny i suppose.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)

oh and hi josh. how are you?

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Julio do you like it more because it's less of a hip-hop track?

I think its main flaw is the way it grinds your face into its positive sentiments so much.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:01 (twenty-two years ago)

it's important to consider that prejudicial conception of the audience together with what I said about 'vocalizing a previously submerged similarity between audiences'. that is, it sounds SO RIGHT to juxtapose that song with eminem's new lyrics, even if they're not new topics for him.

(I like eminem = I am in his audience = a previously submerged similarity between ME and the CLASSIC ROCK AUDIENCE oh no. the trick is to turn it into newfound respect and appreciation for the people I'm distancing myself from, rather than doing the lazy and easy and obvious thing and letting it eventually poison my love for em)

(and maybe other americans don't feel this way, but for the benefit of the british posters I want to mention that the aerosmith song is so canonical, so inescapably recurrent on classic rock radio, that my aversion to it is especially reinforced.)

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:04 (twenty-two years ago)

(but that I don't just hate it because of repetition)

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:05 (twenty-two years ago)

it's probably the third most played aerosmith song on classic rock radio, which is saying something

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:10 (twenty-two years ago)

oh, and the eminem single is awful. there's a reason alt-rock radio stations are playing it.

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I didn't think there were hardly 'positive sentiments'.

''Julio do you like it more because it's less of a hip-hop track?''

well I like that guitar sample at the end but I don't quite understand how its less of a hip-hop track (this is the bit where i show my almost nil understanding of it) but I like his words on that track (especially the first verse, the way he articulates the generation gap between kids and their parents).

if ppl think his lyrics are lame I want them to come here and explain (no lady if you have to ask you'll never know type shit now).

Verse 1
These ideas are nightmares for white parents, whose worst fear is a child with dyed hair and who likes earrings/Like whatever they say has no bearing, it's so scary in a house that allows no swearing/to see him walking around with his headphones blaring, alone in his own zone, cold and he don't care/He's a problem child, and what bothers him all comes out, when he talks about, his fuckin' dad walkin' out/cuz he just hates him so bad that he blocks him out. If he ever saw him again he'd probably knock him out/His thoughts are wacked, he's mad so he's talkin' back, talkin' black, brainwashed from rock and rap/He sags his pants, do-rags and a stocking cap, his step-father hit him, so he socked him back/and broke his nose, his house is a broken home. There's no control, he just let's his emotions go...

Chorus
C'mon! Sing with me (Sing!)/Sing for the year (Sing It)/Sing for the laughter/ sing for the tear (C'mon!) / Sing it with me/Just for today/Maybe tomorrow/The good Lord will take you away...

Verse 2
Entertainment is changin', intertwinin' with gangstas, in the land of the killers, a sinner's mind is a sanctum/ unholy, only have one homie, only this gun, lonely cuz don't anyone know me/Yet everybody just feels like they can relate, I guess words are a mothafucka they can be great/ or they can degrate, or even worse they can teach hate/It's like these kids hang on every single statement we make, like they worship us/plus all the stores ship us platinum, now how the fuck did this metamorphosis happen?/ From standin' on corners and porches just rappin'; to havin' a fortune, no more kissin' ass/But then these critics crucify you, journalists try to burn you, fans turn on you, attorneys all want a turn at you/To get they hands on every dime you have, they want you to lose your mind every time you mad/So they can try to make you out to look like a loose cannon. Any dispute won't hesitate to produce handguns/That's why these prosecutors wanna convict me, strictly just to get me off of these streets quickly/But all they kids be listenin' to me religiously, so I'm signin' CDs while police fingerprint me/They're for the judge's daughter but his grudge is against me. If I'm such a fuckin' menace, this shit doesn't make sense B/It's all political, if my music is literal, and I'm a criminal how the fuck can I raise a little girl?/I couldn't. I wouldn't be fit to. You're full of shit too, Guerrera, that was a fist that hit you!

Chorus

Verse 3
They say music can alter moods and talk to you, well can it load a gun up for you , and cock it too?/Well if it can, then the next time you assault a dude, just tell the judge it was my fault and I'll get sued/See what these kids do is hear about us totin' pistols and they want to get one cuz they think the shit's cool/not knowin' we really just protectin' ourselves, we entertainers, of course the shit's affectin' our sales, you ignoramus/But music is reflection of self, we just explain it, and then we get our checks in the mail. It's fucked up ain't it?/ How we can come from practically nothing to being able to have any fuckin' thing that we wanted/That's why we sing for these kids, who don't have a thing except for a dream, and a fuckin' rap magazine/who post pin-up pictures on they walls all day long, idolize they favorite rappers and know all they songs/Or for anyone who's ever been through shit in their lives, till they sit and they cry at night wishin' they'd die/Till they throw on a rap record and they sit, and they vibe. We're nothin' to you but we're the fuckin' shit in they eyes/that's why we seize the moment try to freeze it and own it, squeeze it and hold it, cuz we consider these minutes golden/and maybe they'll admit it when we're gone. Just let our spirits live on, through our lyrics that you hear in our songs and we can...

Chorus X2

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)

positive sentiments about music then, and it's not disco enough to work as a good 'feel the power of music' track for me.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:20 (twenty-two years ago)

it reminds me of nas' "I can" in ways I'd rather not go into (suffice it to say they involve 'corniness')

James Blount (James Blount), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:22 (twenty-two years ago)

''and it's not disco enough to work as a good 'feel the power of music' track for me.''

only with a disco beat?! now that's corny! ;)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 11 June 2003 08:30 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't want Marshall no more, I want Shady. Marshall's chopped liver.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 12 June 2003 01:25 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm just gonna go ahead and climb up on this rockist cross: there was a degree of subtlety, however slight, to the thoughts expressed in "Dream On." So long, subtlety!

J0hn Darn1elle (J0hn Darn1elle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 01:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Uh the beats are wack, like I said. I don't feel justified in commenting on the lyrics or the chorus or any of that, since I've paid very little attention to those when I've heard it (Aerosmith sample completely overwhelms the rest of the track when it comes in). But I will say that I could come up with and mix a better rhythm track for this tune in about thirty minutes; it's that lame.

Millar (Millar), Thursday, 12 June 2003 02:08 (twenty-two years ago)

i wrote something for my blog back about a month ago using this track as an exemplar of the imminance of pop turning reflexive, an excursion into the realm of spiritual/ideal transcendence as part of the mechanism of the movement of pop, in its oscillation about the notion of the "real".

(i don't even know if that last paragraph makes sense to me.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 03:14 (twenty-two years ago)

it immediately makes me want to know other examples of 'an excursion into the realm of spiritual/ideal transcendence'. but if you mean 'turning' in the sense of 'becoming, in the course of its ongoing oscillation, meaning becoming more real and less real in different ways', then well I guess I still want to know some examples but I'm less worried that you're claiming something historical (a novel development) about rap.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 12 June 2003 03:44 (twenty-two years ago)

in my weird schema in which i was working the whole of indie is the realm of spiritual/ideal transcendence sorta.

that which bases itself on adherence to claimed fixity of eternal concepts as opposed to that which bases itself on adherence to the immediately verifiable world of sensation.

love the ideal vs. sex the particular (or love as a rush of emotional imminance even better)

self respect vs. the respect of others

religion vs. salvation

etc.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 05:32 (twenty-two years ago)

so yeah i'm not claiming anything novel about rap in this, nor about eminem aside from the historic situatedness of how he's particularly doing it (i.e. the terms of language he's bridging from and to)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 05:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't think of any examples offhand that make the concepts central to the songs (scarface 'my block', outkast 'liberation', jay-z 'a week ago' maybe?), but: where in this scheme would you put the omnipresence of concepts of justice and community and etc. in lots of rap? as I understand you, you would have to lump them in with love the ideal etc., so on that side of things - but that seems a little weird because it seems to ruin what you're getting at about the eminem song, which seems different (yes, indie comes to mind). but I suppose since you oppose self-respect to the respect of others, you might associate some of the concepts I'm thinking of with similar sorts of 'immediately verifiable' sorts of things. er. all of this makes me a little uneasy, but there's something here.

yeah, 'the respect of others' and 'salvation' throw me.

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 12 June 2003 06:20 (twenty-two years ago)

i wuz throwing out ideas that deliberately stretch the concepts i'm playing with. the point is that this doesn't happen that often i think, and when it does its part of a conceptual shift in the ethos of a music which is what i meant by "the movement of pop".

i mean also a song "about" justice vs. a song where justice is a concept immediately at hand -- not explored by readymade.

(also on the salvation tip think class differentiation in churches -- you sorta know the creator exists becuz the good book you study tells you so at the top of the line, and way down there you get siezed by the holy spirit and start speaking in tongues. imminance.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 06:47 (twenty-two years ago)

for 'claimed fixity of eternal concepts': perhaps part of the problem I sensed above was that there are plenty of conceptions of, arguments for, concepts like justice being fixed, eternal: solid, real, something to strive for, the right thing to strive for, something we want. or even that a PARTICULAR conception of justice is. but.

it's much harder for me to think about those sorts of concepts (basically I am opposing them all, whatever they are, to 'love' in my head, and nothing else) being as SUBLIME or INEFFABLE as something like love typically is. (or is presented, conceived of, whatever.) perhaps a shift in that direction might help me make more sense of this.

(yet on say buffy when there's a decisive moment of ethical rightness, I often get the feeling that part of the magic comes from the ethical terrain the show depicts: never one kind of justice, always particular circumstances to deal with, problems to be negotiated between. somehow THAT makes it seem more ineffable to me, whereas a more vanilla presentation of justice-as-fairness or something like that doesn't have that same FEELING to it - compare to the times on the show when it seems to weigh toward one too much, like buffy going on and on about duty. obvious connection to 'practice' and ineffability here, on many understandings of 'practice' as an awesomely mercurial theoretical thingamabob that picks up some magic from lived experience and nowhere else)

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:13 (twenty-two years ago)

i feel insulted for the few times i've sat through this song; i want those minutes back so i can do anything else - eat a bagel, masturbate, read a few pages in a book, play arkanoid, write an ilm post - and i will never get them back. ever.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:19 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't like sublime and ineffable as terms for what i'm trying to get at coz they carry too many connotations. and can apply either way.

justice as notion of experientially grounded rightness vs. justice as a sura-historic set of RULEZ i.e.

justice as the killer getting his comeuppance in the end vs. justice as maybe coz he wasn't read his miranda he can't in a just society.

(law and order is a transcendant show, where it is tested and survives each episode. nypd blue is the opposite.)

translate to rap and "conscious" rap bemoans people wronging notions of universal justice and "street" rap bemoans eternal rules getting in the way of individual characters and their aims.

what i like about sing for the moment is how explicitly it transforms that kid in bedroom moment of imminence into a transcendent univeralist principle.

(alternately, and perhaps apropos of the benjamin thread, scholastic and ecstatic kabbalism)

[meanwhile jess i'm honestly surprised you dislike this song. i know its got lots of the same old em shtick in it but the i love the whole bit about moments as golden and i also love how he extends the shtick and concretizes it further -- the whole bit about loading the gun and holding it. like somehow when he makes his "ooh, is it SOCIETY or is it ME or is it YOUR KID" deal that much more earnest it takes on a whole new spin]

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:30 (twenty-two years ago)

[its also the perfect choice for a post 8-mile single since of anything on The Eminem Show it tends to presage that stuff the most]

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:30 (twenty-two years ago)

to be totally honest sterl, i have never once paid attention to the words. on the first listen when i got the album i was immediately dumbstruck by the horror of the pairing & the hamfistedness of the production. on the second (forced) listen i was enraptured (car wreck style) by the horror of the pairing & the hamfistedness of the production. the few other times i've heard it on the radio - while trapped in a car or a store or a waiting room or whatever - it's literally made me uncomfortable (which is quite a feat as it's very rare that i experience such an all encompassing loathing for a piece of music, especially hip-hop [although i guess that's a relative term here]) to the point where i try to block it out. you're right and tom's wrong that it's the perfect choice for a post-8 mile single but the idea of em persuing the "lose yourself" direction as a "direction" fills me with bile.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:35 (twenty-two years ago)

This song is one of those nagging things that makes me think Em's entire career is becoming one long performance art piece designed to give lazy cult-studies fans stiffies.

Clarke B., Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:39 (twenty-two years ago)

What I meant to say in less dickheadish fashion was, I see exactly what sorts of things I'm supposed to find interesting about this song (and about much of Em's persona, frankly, though I like lots of his stuff) -- and those sorts of things have jack crap to do with why I listen to and love music.

Clarke B., Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:41 (twenty-two years ago)

it makes me uncomfortable, too.

jess, dare I mention 'the great depression' and what you've said about it? I don't even know what I might mean by doing so but I'm sure you can do something with it. I'm mostly thinking of the AOR-jacking. (?)

Josh (Josh), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:41 (twenty-two years ago)

We have to figure out where that discomfort comes from... It makes me feel that way, too. "White America" makes me uncomfortable in a similar way -- not in the way it's supposed to make me uncomfortable I guess I should say. I *hate* the "Sign! Come on!" stuff on the chorus -- it's like Em sees infinitive verbs only as commands. And the double-tracked vocal shit? Whoa, it's like Em has multiple personalities! Several Em's talking at once! What a revelation! Stop telling me what hip-hop means to me; that's for me to decide thx.

Clarke B., Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:50 (twenty-two years ago)

i think the difference is that there's this imposed distance when someone like dmx jacks air-punching AOR because no one gives him enough credit for being subtle enough to use dumb smoke-on-the-water riffs, not exactly ironically, but certainly with a kind of googly-eyed humor (in keeping with almost everything else about him.) something like "bloodline anthem" looks straight on the surface because clarke's cult-studs guys don't take him anti-seriously enough, but he's actually deploying it as yet another way of being unhinged and clownish and menacing, whereas em is trying to, y'know, soothe the nation or whatever.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)

so there's this burden on em to come off as being real knowing and "getting in touch with his 'whiteness'" and doing some sort of clever juxtaposition, when he's basically just doing the same thing dmx is - which goes back to that kogan piece on dj's in the voice this week - in that he'll take anything that sounds good, anything from his past, memory of old songs from growing up or whatever and twist em for his own purposes. hip-hop and corn and mawkishness are old friends, but hip-hop and epic-ness rarely work.

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:54 (twenty-two years ago)

another song which makes me uncomfortable in the same way: u2 - "in the name of love"

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:58 (twenty-two years ago)

which i guess means its the chorus, since say "the unforgettable fire" doesn't seem nearly so troublesome

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 07:59 (twenty-two years ago)

" hip-hop and epic-ness rarely work." !!!

also i think that besides the most reductive level em and dmx are doing totally different things, altho 8 mile em came closer to dmx than ever before.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 08:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I heart the return of the Josh.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)

Ya know that he'd be back.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:04 (twenty-two years ago)

I burned the candle at both ends for him. (It is bothering me a touch I don't recognize Nicole's quote but I'll live.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)

This abomination is such a stinking bag of tepid crap.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I also can't get my head around these comments here that read: "since I've never heard the Aerosmith original..." Say WHAT? How on god's cursed earth did you manage to avoid it? Do you live in a cave??

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)

No, dear, just Britain.

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)

Hell, Britain's own Mission covered it back in 1988 (on the abortive Children album). If they'd heard it, why haven't you?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)

I put it to you that there's a gulf of experiences between Wayne Hussey and Tico that the latter is not keen to bridge.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 14:40 (twenty-two years ago)

arrrgh "everybody hurts"!!!!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

I am disappointed: obv. when you think Josh you also think "Return of the Mack".

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

''Hell, Britain's own Mission covered it back in 1988 (on the abortive Children album). If they'd heard it, why haven't you?''

as tico sez, I live in the UK (like you didn't know that alex) where we don't really have this thing for classic rock (I think that is the case though io avoid all radio anyway) but also like to say I have never heard of mission until now actually (i was 9 years old in '88 and actually lived in Brazil then).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:12 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, don't get me wrong -- I'm not championing "Dream On" by Aerosmith (if I had to pick an Aerosmith tune, it'd be "Back in the Saddle"), I'm just surprised that there are people on this earth who haven't heard it. To this day, it still seems pretty inescapable. But, yes, the UK is a bit more progressive in their radio programming that here in the States (and by that I don't mean they play more Marillion and King Crimson, but that they don't perpetually fetishize the past in the same way that Yank radio seems to).

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:31 (twenty-two years ago)

(Also Alex we had a Rolling Stones already)

Tico Tico (Tico Tico), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:35 (twenty-two years ago)

I don't object to this song so much. It's hackneyed, yeah, totally, but there are some great bits on the verses, and I love how Em's delivery is getting all choked up and upset like he's taking every single thing everyone says about him personally (witness him yelling at Ja Rule, "don't you ever mention my little girl's name again!" at the end of that one dis track; he sounds like he's about to cry).

However, I do have serious problems with the marketing/positioning of this song. This was his post-8 Mile, pre-50 Cent media blitz single, and it seems like he threw it out there so alt-rock radio wouldn't forget about him while he pushes 50 down everyone else's throats. Think about the terrible, thrown-together video. Cliched, obnoxious video tour footage that no one needs to see juxtaposed with a shaky single-camera shot of him standing against some shitty wall rapping. And the new footage is shot in the Nine Inch Nails washed-out yellows and greens style! Who the fuck does that anymore? It's such a blatant, clumsy grab at the attention of MOR white fans. Did this thing get played on BET even once? If the song is clumsy and forced and thrown-together (which it is, despite its strengths), the marketing of it is doubly so. Even worse, it's all based on dividing Em's fanbase into distinctly "white" and "black" subsections. Fuck that noise.

Tom Breihan (Tom Breihan), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I am disappointed: obv. when you think Josh you also think "Return of the Mack".

That's one that escaped the memory banks; I couldn't hum it if my life depended on it...

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:48 (twenty-two years ago)

Philistine.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 15:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey! Mean.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

I live in America and I never heart the original to my knowledge.

reasons: a) youth. b) never listening to classic rock stations.

jess to you distrust epicness generally or just in rap? (it appears generally from this thread)

because a general distrust of epicness writes off lots of good stuff, including lots of R&B not to mention uh, cheap trick not to mention phil spector.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't like self-help records

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:25 (twenty-two years ago)

If he actually was shouting "Sign! Come on!" it would be an infinitely better song.

Hip-hop and epicness has the unfortunate tendancy to produce things like Nas's "Hate Me Now" (and boy did I ever after hearing that pile of shit). But then again you might end up with "Fight The Power" (clearly one of the best songs ever written).

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:54 (twenty-two years ago)

jess raging OTM on this thread.

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2003 16:55 (twenty-two years ago)

"in those jeans" is my favorite R&B epic of the moment.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Thursday, 12 June 2003 17:01 (twenty-two years ago)

yes, dan i was thinking of posting something like "fight the power" != "sing for the moment" last night to underscore my point

hell, "fight for your right (to party)" != "sing for the moment"

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 17:42 (twenty-two years ago)

"hip-hop + epic-ness" = good when = inchoate political rage or = getting wicked fucked up or = 2 legit 2 quit

haha i just realized even more than u2 this is the hip-hop "jeremy"!!

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

this revelation must not go uncommented on

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:27 (twenty-two years ago)

But I like "Jeremy".

Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:31 (twenty-two years ago)

It does have that same earnestness and mawkishness as "Jeremy", definitely. And each time I hear both songs I pray I never have to hear them again.

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:33 (twenty-two years ago)

if jeremy had had "sing for the moment" he wouldn't have become "jeremy"

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:39 (twenty-two years ago)

No, he would have become Eminem and the world would be far worse off.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

having been robbed of Mark Pellington's wondrous visions

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:46 (twenty-two years ago)

shut up ned

taking sides: earnest/mawkish obsfucation vs. earnest/mawkish, um, earnestness

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 18:48 (twenty-two years ago)

The only answer to that is a Peter Saville cover, which is distinctly unearnest and utterly unmawkish. It would, however, be incredibly obsfucatory.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 19:00 (twenty-two years ago)

bless you!

amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 12 June 2003 19:15 (twenty-two years ago)

The thing that fascinates me about the song is that it seems, more than anything I've ever heard, to be completely shaped by MTV, not in the normal marketing sense but emotionally. Because back during the hair-metal era, a lot of bands were big enough that they could chart out multi-single, multi-video arcs to their albums, and there was a certain theme to the third or fourth ones: after the blazing first single and its follow-ups and the record's peak chart position came, the bands would release their big stirring AOR power-ballads -- songs not unlike "Dream On" -- as riding-into-sunset farewells. Not coincidentally, the videos for these ballads would almost always consist of slow-mo stage and backstage footage from the tours they'd just done to support the albums. The Eminem song seems built entirely around the vibe not only of hearing those songs but of watching those videos: it borrows the AOR after-the-singles music, it borrows the video-footage approach, and it borrows the Little Old Me conceit of the lyrics, talking -- at the end of a multi-single run -- about what it's all been like, getting all earnest about what he's up to and what his fans are up to, before waving goodbye and going off to work up some new tracks. Eminem is one of very few people these days who are huge enough to do a multi-single sweep with a very "album" track at the end, and since we don't see these kinds of things anymore like we did in the mid to late 80s, I can completely understand why a kid would find this great and important.

That said, I think this sloppy, sloppy song is pretty much ass.

nabisco (nabisco), Thursday, 12 June 2003 19:39 (twenty-two years ago)

In the land of the killers, a sinner's mind is a sanctum = astonishingly classic

Ess, Thursday, 12 June 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Bigtime fuckup not just using Motley Crue's "Home Sweet Home" instead, it's the same fuckin' song as "Dream On" anyway, and he could've sampled some of the video too (I love the bit where the stage gets set up in ultra-fast motion)

dave q, Thursday, 12 June 2003 20:10 (twenty-two years ago)

"Home Sweet Home" is a better song than "Dream On" or "Sing For the Moment"

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)

!!!!

That's a genius idea, it would have saved this song (I would pick the Crue over stupid old Aerosmith any day).

Nicole (Nicole), Thursday, 12 June 2003 22:39 (twenty-two years ago)

that song owned Dial Mtv

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 22:41 (twenty-two years ago)

I think it just owned MTV period. Wasn't there a rule specifically named after the video to prevent things from having a chokehold like that?

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

I'd pick Aerosmith's "Dream On" over stupid old Crue anyday (ok, maybe not over "Without You").

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:19 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, I remember them "retiring" it from Dial Mtv cuz it was so dominant (number one for like nine months of something). and this is when they didn't "retire" alot of songs (the only other one they may have done it with was "Pour Some Sugar On Me", which was number one for a long, long time also, although "Love Bites", "Armageddon It", and (to my vocal consternation) Britny Fox's "Girlschool" would knock it out of the top spot momentarily for a day or two). (the closest thing nowadays is "In Da Club" still charting high on Billboard, six months later).

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:27 (twenty-two years ago)

haha - I actually remember thinking 'this is the end of an era' when they retired it!

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:28 (twenty-two years ago)

they've had to retire plenty of songs on trl tho, right? but i think that might be a purposeful invention to keep product turnover going

jess (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:30 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah, retiring a song on trl is no big whoop, I think they do it automatically after like six weeks or something. I'm sure they retire like at least a song every two weeks there.

James Blount (James Blount), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:35 (twenty-two years ago)

i think its alright,kind of stupid but actually works quite well and is a good laugh overall
i dunno how it is so hated compared to something like cleaning out my closet which was actually the worst thing ever

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:39 (twenty-two years ago)

that reminds me of actually the worst thing ever,involving that song
i was at a rave last weekend and by about 9 in the morning the mixing was getting a bit sloppy...
as i was wandering through the woods hoping someone good would start playing,a new dj came on...
and started playing a really shit techno track
and then proceeded to play the acapella of cleaning out my closet over it
the acapella of the radio edit that is
then he stopped the track so that it was just the chorus
over and over again

it was fucking dicksweat

robin (robin), Thursday, 12 June 2003 23:45 (twenty-two years ago)

This is a great thread! I think the issue can be boiled down to whether you like the arm-waving in the video clip, which pretty much sums it up. I don't mind the song, but I'm pretty much in Tom's camp (too earnestly positive, not disco enough).

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Friday, 13 June 2003 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)

if by not disco enough you mean that the drums are mixed and programmed with such a lack of concern that it drives aspiring producers a la me into fits of rabid sputtering then I completely agree (did I mention the drum track SUCKS SO MUCH FUCKING DISEASED OLD MAN COCK THAT IT CAUSES MY PUBES TO STRAIGHTEN)

Millar (Millar), Friday, 13 June 2003 03:31 (twenty-two years ago)

it sounds like he looped the opening bass drum part from bruce springsteen's "tougher than the rest," is what it sounds like. (nb: "tttr" is a great song, "sftm" is not.)

amateurist (amateurist), Friday, 13 June 2003 04:52 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.