Why does everyone think Derek Bailey (and his fans) are po-faced?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Just a cursory glance at any of his interviews or many of his recordings would prove them wrong. Han has more audience laughter than just about any other live recording i've heard by less "serious" artists. (This question inspired by The Wire letters column.)

hamish (hamish), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:03 (twenty-two years ago)

They laugh, but through a po face.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:14 (twenty-two years ago)

oh of course. I've never been to a Derek Bailey show so I had imagined this source of laughter all wrong. (They laugh humourlessly? What does po-face mean in the northern hemisphere?)

hamish (hamish), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:19 (twenty-two years ago)

All he needs to do to destroy this perception is put Harrison Ford on the cover. Did he?

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:35 (twenty-two years ago)

(I hope this doesn't derail the thread, I'm sort of serious)

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Southern hemisphere Hamish. They laugh, but seriously: to show how clever they are. I am guessing, of course.

Derrick Bailey once said in Wire words to the effect, "Why do people listen to recorded music? What do they do while it's playing" He was genuinely puzzled. The interview shyly suggested that the listener might make a cup of tea while the music was playing. This was a classic Surreal Wire Moment.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:40 (twenty-two years ago)

People did that at "Blue Velvet" when I went a little while ago, it's a horrible thing.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:46 (twenty-two years ago)

What, make a cup of tea?

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:52 (twenty-two years ago)

Yeah. Fuck that shit.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:54 (twenty-two years ago)

that's absolutely brilliant!

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm so totally going to rip off the 'tea making' idea

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:55 (twenty-two years ago)

i thought they laughed because after each piece he would make a little demure joke like "that was the piece" as in "you poncey fules, did you not realize that what i just did for 10, 15, 20, 30 minutes was in face music and that was the end?" and they laughed so as not to feel more uncomfortable then they had already been made to feel

the rest of us just smile

jess (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 05:57 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, we smile a patronising smile, knowing we are better than all that.

colin s barrow (colin s barrow), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 06:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I go "Hmm I think Hamish would probably like this more than me" and swap it for a David Thomas record

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 06:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I assume hamish is talking about ILM's very own Dadaismus. I believe the "po-faced" epithet was employed as part of a larger statement about the kind of uncritical response endemic to a lot of the improv scene. Bailey himself is, of course, quite a salty figure with a healthy sense of humor. It seems that often, especially in regards to the "father figures", there is a reluctance to really engage critically with the improv scene. It's become this kind of noble, rarefied thing. Bailey himself would likely be the first to agree! Hence his noted disdain for recording and producing records. I think for many the early promise of improvisatory performance was to open up a kind of ideal social space rife with transformative possibility and blah blah. Instead we've had a lineage of figures who've established credentials and play the usual venues to enthusiastic crowds of punters ... it's merely another subset of music as routinized social practice mediated by commodification.

When Keith Rowe did a solo set a couple years ago in Chicago, he asked gave a very short, humble introduction in which he asked the crowd not to applaud, and invited members of the audience to come up and play after he was finished. Afterwards, everyone applauded, and no one took him up on his offer.

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 06:05 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah, here's a brief exchange on the subject. although, Julio was initially wrong - it's The Wire that's largely shit, not Dada's letter.

oh and for the record I love Bailey, and everyone should read the interview with him in John Corbett's book, blah blah blah

C'mon, Bailey recorded a feedback blowout with Buckethead - and it was one the greatest things he's ever done!

Mr. Diamond (diamond), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 06:15 (twenty-two years ago)

dada's letter sort of started from the assumption that bailey's playing hadn't changed since the early 70s: the nub of the thing is that i. it has, lots (fear of/refusal to be seen as merely ________ is one of the things driving bailey, surely?), but ii. writing abt this territory of music doesn't really reflect its topography (it's easy to begin writing about it, esp. if yr like 20 and running on pure idealism, but it's *real* hard to not fall into yr own rut, i think)

(julio told me that b.wats0n's book on bailey is out this autumn: haha pigeons meet cat)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 08:09 (twenty-two years ago)

i am not po-faced

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 08:10 (twenty-two years ago)

really?! ;-)

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)

|:|

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

as I recall there are two instances on record where the audience laughs: one is on aida where a beep sound comes up as derek is improvising, he stops, once the beeping stops he begins again and he stops after a few more secs. that's funny to me as well as the audience.

then there is the record with tristan hosinger where he barks as well as play the cello. that again is funny to me.

last week I watched alan wilkinson and some other guitarist at ryan's bar (the venue is below this bar/restaurant). they both play very loud at times. I sit at the front. there is this big window and I can see that ppl drinking outside are puzzled abt this sound and they look toward the window and then some guy is standing right next to it and he starts pointing at and covering his ears. I find this incident funny as well.

I have seen derek live once. it was polite as i recall.

ppl sometimes miss when the ending of an imporvisation and might clap early or if the improvisation ends badly for some reason that is a source of amusement too.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 08:51 (twenty-two years ago)

I haven't heard 'han' yet.

I think keith has a point abt reviews etc. derek releases many recs a year and they are reviewed by the same group of ppl who only review free improv/avant garde recs so after a while you can't expect much.

the wire has too many reviews.

but keith wants a slagging off (on the issue w/yo la tengo one reader asked for similar letters abt AMM etc) it seems to 'balance' things. damn reviewing a record on its own merits, apparently you need to keep a scorecard of bad:good reviews.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 09:00 (twenty-two years ago)

just thought I'd pull this one out as well:

do scroll down

Derek bailey Milo fine duo on wednesday 26th, Leo smith (w improvisers) (and J pierce) on the 29th march

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)

han bennink uses his arms and legs all over his kit -- greg malcolm has this interesting video of a lot of those guys at one of their "total berlin meltdowns" and i was watching it in chch/nz with some others and we all laughed at han, a big bald man, all over his kit with arms and legs very fast, and then nick (a jazz/improv/rock drummer whom hamish and i know) earnestly explained (without laughing -- you have to know him ..) that han was adjusting the tension on the skins here, dampening the rattle there, ie nick had all these technical reasons for han benink being all over his drum kit like a cheap suit

but yes, for the un-initiated, han bennink is quite the stge show to watch, let alone the noise he makes,.. maybe explains the laughter on Han

peter brotzmann seems to live out the more euphorically absurd qualities of his playing as he moves himself complete with instrument of whatever size all over the stage -- when i saw him live i really could not contain myself laughing, which just added to the hysterically speed zonk intelligent reclessness of the music he was playing

oh and cecil taylor verbally and physically addressing the piano, interrogating it, stalking it, attempting to seduce it, etc.. all part of that (they call it) "free form poetry" that often accompanies his perfomances (and maybe he's wearing a purple clown costume for a special occasion) -- don't tell me that stuff isn't meant to be laughed at

they're all great all round entertainers

bailey's ideas about how there cannot be any point to pre-conceived compositions, his book on improvistaion,.. all his school of thought i suppose -- to me he's more, a bit like coltrane, stuck within a range of harmonics, or perhaps a range relative harmonic dissonances

all these guys stick to their guns, but po-faced, i dunno -- certainly bailey seems to have produced the smallest crop of followers

george gosset (gegoss), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)

jamming bailey's performances through ring modulators and filters brings out a bit more colour in them for me -- everybody should have their own programmable ring modulators and filters built into their stereo equipment -- there is so much to be missed out on with realtively mono-chromatic types like bailey otherwise

george gosset (gegoss), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:29 (twenty-two years ago)

me agreeing w.gosset re cecil

me agreeing w.gosset re schools of thought/followers in ref the avant g. (except i think DB would agree w.this also)

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:39 (twenty-two years ago)

ie i think DB's "anti"record stance is the same as gg's "everyone shd have their own ring modulator fitted", not i think DB wd read a piece by me and say "yes mark s you are v.clever i agree totally as per"

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 10:50 (twenty-two years ago)

Derek Bailey himself is not remotely po-faced - generally I don't have a problem with musicians it's the fans and critics who idolize them who get right up my nose.

A case in point, the first time ever i saw AMM (cue for a song) was a free gig at an art gallery in Glasgow - this was open to the public and so had kids and old age pensioners and all sorts milling around. I was there with two of my friends who had no idea who or what AMM were. We were standing directly behind Keith Rowe (AMM were playing in the middle of the room encircled by the audience). At one juncture, Keith Rowe started playing his guitar with a scouring pad, at which point one of my friends burst out laughing (and why not it was funny)- hearing this, a guy who was sitting in front of me jumped up and turned round and said (to me), "Do you mind, some of us take this music very seriously". To which I replied, "I take this music fucking seriously now sit down you little prick and shut the fuck up". Exeunt little prick. Of course, after the gig, my laughing friend ended up nattering away to Keith Rowe and asked him what brand of scouring pad he preferred...

Generally, improv is often very funny to witness, which is one of the sweetest things about it. However, Derek Bailey isn't one of its funniest practitioners, it must be admitted!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 12:30 (twenty-two years ago)

if you ate an oyster sandwich at a Derek Bailey gig would you then be po-boy-faced?

hstencil, Tuesday, 24 June 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)

derek bailey is usually a picture of concentration and there's nothing wrong with that. and so are AMM.

I have seen AMM a couple of times (the last time a couple of weeks ago) and Keith had all these toys or whatever and he'd shove them in amongst the strings and I found it funny bcz I don't think he's pluck those strings with his fingers once. Though i didn't laugh out loud.

from what you're saying dada there are ppl who take music incredibly seriously and forget their manners in the process. that's v unfortunate but not all ppl who like this kind of music are like that (at least that's what i'd like to think but i don't talk to anyone at gigs).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 15:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Bailey's spoken word piece on 'Plays' and his little monologue on 'Lace' are both pretty dry/funny - plus it helps that DB used to look like John Shuttleworth and now looks like Samuel Beckett.

Mark S is TOTALLY OTM abt Bailey's sound being diff. in the 60s/70s/80s/90s, which apart from deliberate stylistic modifications/variations, also comes out of his need/desire to put himself in new playing situations.

Andrew L (Andrew L), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 19:57 (twenty-two years ago)

One time when I saw AMM live,Eddie Prévost started playing with a transistor radio. At one point he tuned into a station that was playing Steve Miller Band's "Jungle Love" and several people, AMM included just busted out laughing...Best ending everah....

brg30 (brg30), Tuesday, 24 June 2003 23:25 (twenty-two years ago)

Some possibly irrelevant things: Once Nick (the excellent drummer George mentioned above) went to a fundie-Christian rally where this cheesy televangelist called Benny Hinn healed all these people and sung really badly. We couldn't stop laughing and these xtians in front of us started threatening and abusing us. As with AMM fans some people just don't think things should be enjoyable.
Nick is currently in London playing shows with the Brunettes. They're don't play free music but theres heaps of humour in their music nonetheless so you Londoners should check them out.

hamish (hamish), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 06:46 (twenty-two years ago)

oh yeah London is a big place. I dunno where they're playing cause their crappy website uses Flash.

hamish (hamish), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 06:50 (twenty-two years ago)

what do you do when the record is on -> what do you do at a performance?!?!

Josh (Josh), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 07:02 (twenty-two years ago)

What don't you make tea at gigs?

hamish (hamish), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)

zing!

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 08:10 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't talk to anyone at gigs

Well neither do i unless its to tell them to sit down and shut the fuck up

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)

... and you forget Julio that I actually like this kind of music!

Dadaismus (Dada), Wednesday, 25 June 2003 10:11 (twenty-two years ago)

I can't stand humour in improv when it's deliberate - Willem Breuker Kollektief, Workshop de Lyon, all post-Tropic Appetites Carla Bley (not that you'd call the latter improv) - all seems a bit Rag Week to me. For the definitive demolition of this sort of thing see LeRoi Jones' "The Burton Greene Affair" essay.

The only person who can get away with the slapstick stuff is Han Bennink just because of the man's sheer unstoppable power and momentum. Especially when he's in duet with Misha Mengelberg, one of the great straight men in all of jazz/improv.

Marcello Carlin, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 10:35 (twenty-two years ago)

Po like teletubbies Po?

that new cdr with the 19 string PHWOARR!!

bob snoom, Wednesday, 25 June 2003 15:32 (twenty-two years ago)

slapstick is one sort of humour that arises that can be like spike jones or frank zappa or greg malcolm or eugene chadbourne -- an element of esp. live performance, but surely not always damning the whole event to a cringe thing ?

as to carla bley, see this thread

george gosset (gegoss), Thursday, 26 June 2003 01:15 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.