Indie 'Ethics' - Classic or Dud

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Well? Should a group of people have a communal ethic when it comes to a) being in a band b) promoting a band c) putting out a band's cd or d) writing about a band?

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 12:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I think from a band member's point of view, some rapport with the other band members would be beneficial. As the list moves from a) to d) the amount of required community decreases. In the case of d), too much community spirit results in zero objectivity.

person#0 (person#0), Monday, 18 August 2003 12:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I agree with your views on d.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 12:59 (twenty-two years ago)

a) being in a band

yes and no. theoretically yes, and in bands i have been it has been essential, but in practice perhaps not, the better music can often be made my those that have a vision they want to see through, but then much music is great from collaboration, gang spirit, spinning off each other, perhaps it is like a great football side, you want great people in your team, as long as they are not challenging you for your place in the side

b) promoting a band

i dont know, i can see how musicians are not particularly interested in this, usually this gets delegated out?

c) putting out a band's cd

well, depends, i think if its the curator type label, then no, but a gang label like suburban base was, the collaboration seems important, they were all on each others records, putting on each others events etc

d) writing about a band?

hmm, isnt writing a solitary experience? would the communality be with the bands (in which case risk some alienation from readers?), or communality with the audience? with the bands id have to say no communality otherwise you are just PR? with audience? well, i guess there has to be some communality or perhaps it might seem like they are being hectored or patronised? but probably not a huge amount of communality...

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)

Neither classic nor dud -- just...tiresome.

Naive Teen Idol (Naive Teen Idol), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:07 (twenty-two years ago)

i will put a case scenerio for you to consider - the darkness are from a corporate indie label - must destroy. alright? no biggie. however i hate the darkness and all that they stand for. i've been asked on three occassions to do live reviews of other must destroy bands. i know that i would give them bad reviews based on the fact that i feel, in a civilized world, that the darkness, that shit robbie williams metal act, must not continue. so i say 'no ... that's o.k. ...' i have turned down the chance to review said bands because i feel that i'm not open enough to them. and said bands don't get reviews in papers however is this a dodgy ethical issue? i think it would be if i reviewed said bands.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 13:32 (twenty-two years ago)

I have to admire yr ability to turn down reviews in the interests of objectivity/integrity.

person#0 (person#0), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:33 (twenty-two years ago)

thanks, i know i've got a small number of people reading the nme and following my suggestion based on those reviews and well i don't want to lead them astray by supporting something i don't believe in.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 13:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Why not just give them bad reviews then?

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:40 (twenty-two years ago)

because i ain't no hata!

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)

haha obv doomie's been reading thos magazines about hip-hop from the african american perspective he's been looking for

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:43 (twenty-two years ago)

too right.

good suggestions all 'round.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 13:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Well? Should a group of people have a communal ethic when it comes to a) being in a band b) promoting a band c) putting out a band's cd or d) writing about a band?

a) not necessarily. that's up to the group of people. sometimes, the band really is one person's project and they've got all the ideas. they just need others to help play the instruments and be part of the deal. sure, when you bring any other person into something, you're giving them some ability to alter that central idea, but still. projects happen a lot of ways and enforcing an ethic seems as lame as those punk diy nonprofit purists like propaghandi and so on... their credits accounted for every dollar spent to prove there was no profit. it's overkill.

b) i think it's a lot cheaper to be communal. if you want success, you need ground swell first. i think indie does this out of necessity. major labels can afford to promote via various mass mediums... but indie groups HAVE to do this.

c) see b.

d) eh... it can help to have a clue about a scene and sort of be involved... but i think it can be very useful to have a distance as well. when you're writing about your friends, it becomes really hard to be truly critical. we all love to see our friends succeed. frequently that increases our cred ... so conflicts of interest abound as well. it's one of those reasons why as much as i hate having a very tight budget to buy records to review on the PRL... i think it's fortunate in many ways. being a consumer, i feel the hit when a record sucks. plus i'm not overwhelmed with a stack of 50 new cds in a couple weeks time, most of which might suck, and leave me jaded and fudgemouthed with no taste left for anything that's ACTUALLY good.

i suppose that's a big duality tho. cause on the flipside, promos are cool because you have actually heard record A and record B and perhaps can really have the statistical sample large enough to objectively say, record F actually is the best of the alphabet, while fanboys like me have to just rely on hoping we spidey sense our way to record F.

and what forked stick really brought us to F?
m.

msp, Monday, 18 August 2003 13:52 (twenty-two years ago)

i dont know, i think i would take the bad review angle, i think its good to be true to yourself, if a band is bad, call it like it is. most people dont have much money to spend on records, and its good to hear if people out there think something is bad, or that something else is better. if you bought 3 albums straight that got good reviews but were actually mediocre, would you buy the 4th album (which might be fantastic)?

if something is bad, do you want to be told, or would you rather the buck was passed to someone that will give it the good review? if everything gets good reviews, what is to separate journalism from PR? tell the public the truth

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 13:59 (twenty-two years ago)

ack. but because i know i can't seperate what i think is *my* truth (personal hatred of must destroy) and the universal truth (are any of those bands worthwhile???)= conflict of interest which at that point i take myself otu of the ball game.

i know it's not a conflict of interest for others. but i'm just saying that would i know it's bad or not? critical judgement flawed. bang. no review.

and gareth - the amount of crap i get sent - believe you me - the public does get the truth!

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:03 (twenty-two years ago)

you have to state your opinion (it is art! there is no truth, only opinion!)

the public must either trust you or not on your opinion. if they believe you about 6 records, they will believe you about the 7th. if you dodge, how will they know. what a person doesnt like is as telling as what they do like, it gives a more rounded picture.

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:06 (twenty-two years ago)

however am i judging a piece of art on quantifiable merits - 'is it any good' or personal merits 'i hate band a so automatically i am resistant to band b and c'. nah. i feel ok with stepping out because my critical faculties are flawed in that area.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:11 (twenty-two years ago)

but couldnt you put that in the piece?

i mean, just as the quantifiable and personal are present in yourself, do you not believe they are not present in your readers. they will have similar things themselves?

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

ha ha "quantifiable merits"

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

"it's got a good beat and i can dance to it...i give it an 89"

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:13 (twenty-two years ago)

and in all three cases nobody got any love -- the band nor myself!!!

(PS. Strongo - I was going to actually type that and laughed when i said 'quantifiable merits'.)

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)

gareth, I would rather be focussing my energies on bands that I love than bands that I am 'meh' about. I love the gossip and am reviewing them tonight for the nme. ok. that's no problem. the new album rocks. it's got a good beat and the singer is sexy as fuck. i'm excited. however a promo comes my way from an emi-associated nightmare bon jovi band and i think - oh fuck this - and it goes unlistened to the 'rock'n'roll welfare' pile. nah. it's not exactly chekhov.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:18 (twenty-two years ago)

writer's ethics = "will it make me write well?"

this shd trump everything surely?

mark s (mark s), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:27 (twenty-two years ago)

I know Swells doesn't exactly get a lot of love round these parts, but his assertion that music journalists should be the dung beetles of rock - making it their duty to clear away all the shit that clogs up the listening pathways - remains true totally and entirely. Too much tolerance is given to mediocre and pointless bands, just because they've "made the effort" to be in a band (like it's some sort of ardous task or something). I am saying this from as objective a viewpoint as I can - if someone writes a review of Shed Seven spouting undyinglovefromthebottomoftheirheart, then good on them... Just don't be shy of panning stuff that you think adds nothing to the collective human consciousness, that's all... future generations, particularly those assigned the task of distributing landfill, will thank you for it.

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:32 (twenty-two years ago)

yea, fair point doomie, if you cant be bothered because something is merely 'meh', then there is no point, but thats not an ethical point so much as a personal point, what you actually want to do kind of thing, i mean, i wouldnt want to write those pieces either. from an external/objective point, a magazine needs to tell people that there are bad records, but from a personal view, i agree that i would fidn it difficult to wade through a mountain of mediocre indie records, and wouldnt do such a task either

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)

ie, thats not ethics i wouldnt want to do that, but because its not of any interest to do that

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)

but the ethical issue comes from - how much of the 'meh' factor is from 'must destroy' - something that i find very 'meh' or how much of it is honest-to-goodness 'meh'.

gareth - i wade through so much crap you don't want to know. it's heartbreaking. especially for a music lover.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)

mark - admittedly i dumped all over music journalism at first but to be honest - every review i've had makes me a better writer - tighter, consistent, etc (you don't see it on ilx because it is typing rather than talking) but yeah i've improved a helluvalot. a cali lit magazine wants a short story which is cool.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)

http://theaction.com/boston/pics/sealshow.jpg

Look! Look! A performing seal! It's so proud! Go on; feed it some fish.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

nah. performing seals would have done the reviews regardless of feelings. pah. don't be a hata nick. i get so many hata's i can't barely count them anymore.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 14:57 (twenty-two years ago)

well, i have a clearer picture now, and i agree, dont do the review (i originally thought you wanted to but were conflicted by ethics, now i see that its more a 'why waste time writing a 'so-so' on another indie band'). i take my hat off to people who wade through all those records, i think its good they are prepared to do that.

i didnt know you had a lot of hatas doomie, im sorry to hear that (is this something to do with increased profile at nme?)

gareth (gareth), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:04 (twenty-two years ago)

http://images-eu.amazon.com/images/P/B000007UFF.02.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:08 (twenty-two years ago)

"because i ain't no hata!
-- deathnight (jfdlaj...), August 18th, 2003 3:41 PM. (later)

I'd hate to be hated by you, doomie old chum.

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:09 (twenty-two years ago)

But to answer the question, not liking a band is all part of the journalistic experience, no? I would think you'd cover myself by telling your editor that you knew you were going to turn in a negative review and let them decide if it's what they want to run.

Mark C (Mark C), Monday, 18 August 2003 15:16 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie please stop speaking in whatever godawful vision of hip-hop slang this is supposed to be. please. dear god.

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie: "word, g sauce."

strongo hulkington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 18 August 2003 16:22 (twenty-two years ago)

pah! get out of me face hata!

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 16:26 (twenty-two years ago)

because i ain't no hata!
-- deathnight (jfdlaj...), August 18th, 2003.

What a pathetic cop out answer. If you don't like thgem have the guts to say so and be unpopular (with all those Darkness fans).

ack. but because i know i can't seperate what i think is *my* truth (personal hatred of must destroy) and the universal truth (are any of those bands worthwhile???)= conflict of interest which at that point i take myself otu of the ball game.
i know it's not a conflict of interest for others. but i'm just saying that would i know it's bad or not? critical judgement flawed. bang. no review.

If you don't believe your opinion is right, you should stop now. There is no universal truth.
If you don't like it it, it _is_ bad.

Your reasons for liking/disliking bands are no more or less petty than other peoples. As those reasons are non-musical in this case you have an opotunity to bring others around to your point of view wheras usually you wouldn't as you can't change how something actually sounds.

mei (mei), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:43 (twenty-two years ago)

I sold my ticket to Ash because they supported Robbie Williams and suddenly my respect for them hit the gutter.

So I guess there's an answer in there somewhere.

But when I'm out at a club I'll be fucked if I'm going anywhere near the indie floor.

Calz (Calz), Monday, 18 August 2003 17:58 (twenty-two years ago)

dude, mei, i have absolutely NO QUALMS about being unpopular. you have obviously not been around ilx that long... darkness have fans? i'm sorry i thought they had consumers. me? i'm taking care of my business and dude - you don't really factor.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 18:41 (twenty-two years ago)

Of Arrowe Hill are on Must Destroy, and they are FANTASTIC!! don't pass up an opportunity to spread the good Arrowe word..

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 18 August 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

roight.

having just seen the gossip live ... i can safely say that it's all indie rubbish ... my god ...beth is a bona fide star ... she destroys all that indie rubbish ...complete star. arrowe hill is an emi a & r guy's band ... pah ... beth is one sexy thang ...

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 23:06 (twenty-two years ago)

i don't give a rats ass if the head of Sony are a member. i still like them.

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Monday, 18 August 2003 23:08 (twenty-two years ago)

after seeing beth live ... my god ... whatta voice ... she is a spiritualist of rock'n'roll ... my fucking god ... actually shaking after the gig ... the only time that i'm going to admit that i'm jealous of jess is that he gets to check out that band live where he lives all the time ... that was fucking cool.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 23:09 (twenty-two years ago)

that was really fucking cool. intense.

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 23:10 (twenty-two years ago)

what a voice ... my god ... that was like lisa k from the bellrays/aretha/bessie smith ... that wasnt fashionista nonsense that was true soul ...

deathnight, Monday, 18 August 2003 23:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Hey, I saw Gossip on Sunday!

They were great!

Mmmm bearfoot Beth Ditoo.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 06:45 (twenty-two years ago)

mei - didja think what i was thinking - BONA FIDE AUTOMATIC SOUL SUPERSTAR? my god she can sing ... and entertain and put on a fucking show. afterwards i felt like i just fucked the entire band ... that has happened three times since i've been reviewing gigs live ... my god that was fantastic ... that girl is super sweet when iw was chatting to her about how to use a london payphone but when she got up on stage she owned...no questions.

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:24 (twenty-two years ago)

truthfully since it was a careless talk night i was expected some sub-par sonic youth ra ra ra i'm a girl singer in a rock'n'roll band boring boring boring nonsense but my god ... that was fucking god. afterwards i sent my friend a 1000 word email about how beth is going to save rock'n'roll from it's boring arse self!

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:26 (twenty-two years ago)

indie lives on in the funniest places.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)

yeah, movement, it's hard to be correct and concise at work. i've not actually looked at the cd case as it's been in my walkman non-stop.

but WHAT IS THE BEST PURCHASE TO MAKE AFTER MOVEMENT ... i need to carry on my love ...

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)

definitely 'that's not what i heard'. then the 'arkansas heat' EP.

stevie (stevie), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

cool. i'm hitting rough trade tonight. thanks!

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)

mei - didja think what i was thinking - BONA FIDE AUTOMATIC SOUL SUPERSTAR?

Well she's one hell of a little belter and though I know nothing about soul she WILL BE A SUPER STAR!

I said hi after the gig and asked if she got the mix CD I made for them ad yr right, she's really sweet off stage.

I saw PJ Harvey on Friday and she was wierd like that too. During the soundcheck she'd be fiddling with her pedals and talking to the band and crew in the sweetest silliest softest yokel voice then SNAP just switch on the southern midnight sex-death holler. Awesome.

mei (mei), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)

CARLTON GOES TO COMPTON

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Yo Carlton, uncle phil and aunt viv going to kill your ass when he finds out you been hangin' with twee nme hacks

Jazz (Ronan), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)

I saw PJ Harvey on Friday and she was wierd like that too. During the soundcheck she'd be fiddling with her pedals and talking to the band and crew in the sweetest silliest softest yokel voice then SNAP just switch on the southern midnight sex-death holler. Awesome.

That sound awesome - dude - where was PJ playing???

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:47 (twenty-two years ago)

Eden Project in St. Austell (see Bands who come from near where you live (do not read if you hate small towns) for more on this 'delightful' town). I am answering for Mei cos my spidey sense tells me he is doing something else.

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 10:53 (twenty-two years ago)

how was aidan smith???? i missed him on the rough trade weekend. apparently a few tracks from the new album sound like united states of america.

damn. edan project sounded fine.

deathnight, Tuesday, 19 August 2003 11:00 (twenty-two years ago)

my girlfriend and i went there the week before, its such a glorious place... fascinating.

stevie (stevie), Tuesday, 19 August 2003 11:39 (twenty-two years ago)

This is what the Eden Project looks like! Just got the photos back. If you look carefully you might be able to make out PJ on stage, just above the white van:
http://www.meirion.lewis.btinternet.co.uk/pics/edenfar.jpg


And here's a closer view. Note the pink flip flops and very short blue denim dress which were later exchanged for high-heeled leather boots that went half way up her calves and had a metal ring around each ankle bone and a white slowing pixie dress, even shorter than the denim. So short in fact that from the crowd you could see right through the gap between her legs, near the top.

More importantly, did I mention the southern midnight sex-death holler, great band interplay and passionate songs?

http://www.meirion.lewis.btinternet.co.uk/pics/pjsoundcheck.jpg

mei (mei), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 05:38 (twenty-two years ago)

cheers mei ... i submitted my gossip review last night - ric menck said that the original 1000 word stream of consciousness review was 1000x more exciting than the pro-version but you know what ... the magazine isnt a 1000 word stream of consciousness review. i only know one cat who is crazy enough to put my freeflow stuff up and it's only on the 'net ... but i think i got the essential - man, i felt like i was fucked by the entire band, all shaky, need a cigarette vibe in. edan project seems amazing. did you see aidan smith, mei?

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 07:03 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked Nick Southall's review best

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:05 (twenty-two years ago)

mei, did you review the edan project gig? can you link me up if you did? i dunno about nick southpaw's review? i read his elbow review and it contained none of the qualities that he bitched that i lacked upthread - it had a windblow over-the-top louis b meyer b-movie quality about it.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 08:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Fuck off, Doomie.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:01 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm sorry Nick, not trying to be a hata but ...


"Who are you to judge whether I can go anywhere? I'm just suggesting that there are other ways of expressing / understanding it than just spouting the same stuff over and over again, positing certain unarguable buzzwords loaded with mimetic associations that cause most people to shudder backwards and say "oh, soul, well, yes" and turn off any critical discussion that might help us actually understand who we are, what we're doing and why we're here a bit better."


Yer elbow review was like Wuthering Heights.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:15 (twenty-two years ago)

I liked it. I don't think the rekkid is *that* good and the Hood comparison is a tad bizarre, but it's hardly a candidate for Pseud's Corner. I salute your dripping enthusiasm for The Gossip as well, but it's not like I'd print a piece written like that. So it's just as well this is only an interweb discussion site, really.

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)

You are, Doomie, just admit it. I have no problem admitting that I don't like you. And I at least don't retreat behind the word 'soul' at every given opportunity.

I've never read Wuthering Heights. Is it good?

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm not saying it's awful. what i was trying to say is that i did not see the qualities that he expressed were NEEDED and not NEEDED in the review. you know? i'll be the first to admit that i'm not an rock'n'roll academic - i just like to get people excited about rock'n'roll. but i was looking for the qualities that he expressed upthread ... and did not find them.

and nick, learn to take a little bit of criticism. christ knows i do .. wuthering heights is good - the ending flags alot for my taste.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:33 (twenty-two years ago)

Can we make this a thread where Doomie has a tantrum and fucks off for the thousandth time?

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)

nah.

let's leave this thread about the southern death-hollerers ...

(it makes me laugh though that people come onto this thread and think they are upsetting me ... i just think ... wot a bunch of bizarre net people ...)

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)

and 'sides i'm waiting for mei to talk about the edan project.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)

I think more music reviews should be written like Wuthering Heights. Jane Austen too. It'd make a nice change from the usual increasingly homogenous music press house style.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, Doomie, it's one review. I've written plenty more that work on different levels apart from just the emotional resonance one. Criticism I can take, and in fact welcome, but when you've only read one thing by me it's a bit rich. My problem with you is not your 'work' writing - I've not read enough to judge - it's your messageboard deportment. Simple as that.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:39 (twenty-two years ago)

doomie we all know about your short temper

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)

nick, i read you all the time. it's good stuff and gets stronger with each review.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:42 (twenty-two years ago)

yer one of maybe three people i read? because it's cool to see it get better with each review ...

but anyways ... ego shmego ... i'm waiting on mei.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Good. Truce. Friends, even, maybe.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:47 (twenty-two years ago)

you don't have to be friends with me ... you just have to start writing like i know yer leading up to - NOW! just try to write to a smaller word count and cut down on the over-descriptives. just a test, really.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:53 (twenty-two years ago)

Overdescriptives ROCK you mentalist. The best reviews are the ones when you get the feeling you know exactly what the record sounds like before you've even heard a note.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)

I'm trying to achieve symbiosis of a small-word count AND over-descriptives; ie; 200 words of adjectives and colour nouns.

Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)

over descriptives only ROCK if the general idea is not lost in the sea of pretty words.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:43 (twenty-two years ago)

Or a sea of hyperbole and overexcited superlatives?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)

ain't saying i havent done it but i'm not a music journalist nor do i want to be one.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:04 (twenty-two years ago)

i'm a fan who happens to write about music.

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:05 (twenty-two years ago)

Just a mixed-up kid, trying to make some sense of a world gone mad

[PS Mei was just there for his own enjoyment AFAIK]

DJ Mencap (DJ Mencap), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:15 (twenty-two years ago)

mei can still talk about the edan project can't he?!!! I WANT TO GO TO THE NEXT ONE YOU SEE...

(that was funny because that is my saying as well INSTEAD it's WE ARE JUST TWO MIXED UP KIDS IN LOVE ...)

deathnight, Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:20 (twenty-two years ago)

Doomie is right about The Gossip live - they're stellar.

Tom (Groke), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 11:29 (twenty-two years ago)

was the singer from the gossip the one that appeared at a karaoke FAP? tell me about it

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 12:04 (twenty-two years ago)

learn to take a little bit of criticism. christ knows i do

Hm.

Thy Lethal Zen Ned (Ned), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 14:17 (twenty-two years ago)

Yes, that was her Gareth. Next Gossip gig in London is this Saturday at the Spitz, if anyone's interested.

Ricardo (wearing his promoters hat) (RickyT), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 14:55 (twenty-two years ago)

I am.

I think we should all meet Doomie.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 21:06 (twenty-two years ago)

there is no reason why doomie cannot come to lost on sunday to see jeff mills. i suspect he has better things to do, but i just got a new consignment of pills in so if he fancies a docklands warehouse party?

gareth (gareth), Wednesday, 20 August 2003 22:45 (twenty-two years ago)

Haha Gareth, you're going to get destroyed.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 21 August 2003 07:56 (twenty-two years ago)

he's not called doom-e for nothing. he's not called a wanker for nothing either mind you.

Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 21 August 2003 08:03 (twenty-two years ago)

Well what do you wanna know?

I intended to spend all afternoon wandering around the domes but in the end just did a couple of hours before the gig. I came down on the train to St Austel and after eating lovely fish and chips and realising finding somewhere to stay was going to be too hard I cut my losses, boutght a sleeping bag in Argos (£7.49, bargain) and got the bus to the Eden Project.

Never been before and coming in my draw dropped AND my eyes popped. The bus sort of edged around the top of the roughly bowl shaped valley the EP nestles in and there's a lot of obvious earthwork been done. The domes at the bottom of the valley look HUGE and all the modern buildings and stuff make it look like a dimple on a terraformed moon.

The car parks and bus stops and stuff are near the top of one edge of the valley and called stuff like Apple-1 and Orange-3 making it even more sci-fi, then you zig-zag down the side to the very modern entrance section, still fairly high up like a ski lodge with bars and food and toilets and a shed to locker bags etc. in. Then walk on down and around to the gig sit and the domes near the base of the valley.

The guitar riff of the first track of Songs... was playing as I walked through the entrance section, got my wrist band etc. and I thought it was odd because I've never seen a roady play the main artists songs as a check, they always do Smoke On The Water or something. Then I realised it was actually PJ so I ran down to get closer, taking a couple of photos and generally nosing around flabberghasted. I saw about twenty minutes of her warming up and discussing and trying the setting for various songs, dropping in and out of character and chatting with the band and the technician guys. She had a bit of trouble with one of the other tracks off Songs... it's got her voice echoing at the start and at first she had too short a delay time and too many repeats. One of her guitars had a beer mat taped to the back to cushion her flimsy body from its bulk. After this chunk of sunlit magic she left and we were ushered away so the area in front of the stage could be set up.

That's when I went for a walk around the domes themselves, which seemed much smaller and less impressive on the inside. The temperate zone had tomatoes which I was very tempted to nick but therre were loads of workers around and I didn't want to miss PJ over a warm tomatoe. The tropical zone was a bit hotter but it was so hot outside that day anyway there wasn't really much of a contrast.

Probably great if horticulture is yr thing but I wanted animals running round. I'm sure they could get a few monkeys or swuirrels or something to liven the place up. They had bananas growing in the tropical bit.

I was going to go back in later, during Elbow who were total, total dross - who the hell chose them? - but then I bumped into a few people I know and started chatting.

The gig bit was great but if it had been raining it wouldn've been a nightmare. There's a flattish bit of tarmac that'll hold a couple of thousand ppl surrounded by fairly steep grass banking which would be a mud slide in the wet.

What else?

mei (mei), Thursday, 21 August 2003 18:32 (twenty-two years ago)

i wont get destroyed, bluster is never to be taken seriously

gareth (gareth), Friday, 22 August 2003 00:42 (twenty-two years ago)

I want 2 go 2 the warehouse partee 2!


( But only if it's illegal, innit)

mei (mei), Friday, 22 August 2003 09:24 (twenty-two years ago)

one year passes...
Apply to join the indieclick Network and earn ad revenues today!

Apply Today!!! Only the best indie content and communities can join indieclick. You must be approved by the indieclick team to join. When you join indieclick, you become a valuable member of our Network, serving millions of impressions through the Internet’s most popular youth culture community sites, including SuicideGirls.com and MakeOutClub.com, each with 30,000-50,000 active daily users. With SuicideGirls on the cover of Spin magazine, interviewed by MTV and featured in Wired Magazine, and Makeout Club recently featured in Spin, Cosmopolitan and TechTV, the indieclick Network raises the profile of all of our members.

http://3jane.com/services.php?sub=2&cat=2a

Gillespie, Park (Is In Your Heart), Friday, 18 February 2005 18:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Indie Click Dot Com

Gillespie, Park (Is In Your Heart), Friday, 18 February 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.