"feminists" pt II: music through the gender cracks

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
So one of the questions I asked on "Feminists and Feminist-sympathizers" was what music isn't getting coverage coz of "gender trouble". Or maybe we should say "proper" coverage -- i.e. crit as opposed to MTV news etc. Or maybe even is getting "proper" coverage but dismissive or flat off-the-mark coverage.

The two things that spring to my mind are teenpop and male r&b, but those are also two of the things i generally happen to like a great deal but feel are critically underrepresented -- so it might just be my biases showing. Also in both cases the "gender trouble" is the threat of active female sexuality, as also expressed in Courtney Love - Cash Cow or Evil Bitch -- and i know this isn't the only sort of gender trouble around.

(What is is about gender and cat power, for example? Or avril?)

(Alternately when madonna provokes a response how does she always have the calvary waiting for a counteroffensive when x y and z don't?)

Which is why I'm asking this question.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 02:23 (twenty-two years ago)

what's the music equiv. of a woman in a power suit and is anyone threatened by it?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

Or of janet reno?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:32 (twenty-two years ago)

hillary clinton?

gloria s?

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:34 (twenty-two years ago)

i honestly can't think of anyone that fits the analogy

the surface noise (electricsound), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:35 (twenty-two years ago)

hilary rosen

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Oooh, chicks with guitars/pianos/other non-vocal instruments! Novel! Let's lump them all together and send them to a Lilith Fair ghetto.

this question makes my head hurt (bloodandsparkles), Monday, 16 February 2004 03:56 (twenty-two years ago)

tori/kate bush/ani you mean? i didn't mention them coz they do get coverage and coverage from people who like them i think.

and norah jones and vanessa carleton sorta broke that mold anyway i think.

does alanis cause gender trouble?

(nb i love the term gender trouble but have plenty of problems with how butler used the idea)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 04:08 (twenty-two years ago)

Anthony OTM.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 16 February 2004 04:11 (twenty-two years ago)

Surely the strongly maintained (still) division of (female) sexuality and craft is the biggest sticking point. And I think people like Tori and Kate are relevant here because, even when they get good coverage it's largely uncritical or off-the-mark because critics don't know how to tackle the problem of unwinding craft and sexuality.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 16 February 2004 04:30 (twenty-two years ago)

Tim: expand pls. i don't see it with what I've read on Tori or Kate (and surely Tori playes successfully on sexuality-as-craft as her appeal -- not to drooling guys necessarily either). I mean yeah we see tori the gifted emotionalist more than tori the skilled craftworker, but isn't that what she's *trying* to be? and don't critics usually praise her craft in doing that? [granted when she's not getting dismissed out-of-hand].

or are you arguing the opposite? i can't tell.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 04:49 (twenty-two years ago)

Ani De Franco, prolly. But the question is whether she's threatening, or if she just really sucks.

ModJ (ModJ), Monday, 16 February 2004 05:13 (twenty-two years ago)

Sinead O'Connor. Compare the results of her ripping the Bible vs. Manson's.

anode (anode), Monday, 16 February 2004 07:40 (twenty-two years ago)

Wouldn't Polly Jean Harvey be a good choice? I like the way she approaches her gender in music.

John Inglewood (John), Monday, 16 February 2004 08:23 (twenty-two years ago)

I mean yeah we see tori the gifted emotionalist more than tori the skilled craftworker, but isn't that what she's *trying* to be? and don't critics usually praise her craft in doing that? [granted when she's not getting dismissed out-of-hand].

She normally DOES get dismissed out of hand though... and I think one of Tim's points was that criticism of female singer-songwriters inevitably conflates them with each other regardless of how much or how little they actually have in common. That's true for all women in pop/rock to an extent: they get compared with each other on the flimsiest of excuses, and in ways that men rarely do.

I've seen very few reviews which praise Tori as a 'skilled craftworker' - a few token nods to her piano virtuosity in the "she was a freaky child prodigy" sense, but nothing about her stylistic shifts and self-production (eg criticism of From The Choirgirl Hotel focused on the miscarriage which inspired much of it rather than the fact that she'd gone electronic, and nothing I've seen even attempted to tie those two things together). And from what I've read... I think Tori actually prides herself more on her craft than her emotion.

The Lex (The Lex), Monday, 16 February 2004 12:43 (twenty-two years ago)

"Or maybe we should say "proper" coverage -- i.e. crit as opposed to MTV news etc."

Even with the quotation marks round "proper" this strikes me as an odd notion of the kind of coverage artists (female or not) actually want or need. Like feeling sorry for Oscar winner on the grounds that they would obviously rather have played the nurse in a touring production of "Romeo and Juliet".

Naomi, Monday, 16 February 2004 15:33 (twenty-two years ago)

well there *was* this thread: Vanessa Carlton VS Michelle Branch VS Chantal Kreviazuk VS Norah Jones VS Alicia Keys ad infinitum but it didn't get into what was going on with the lumping together genderwise.

What I meant was Tori ties emotion and craft together pretty tight in how she views music (and this is evident from the music even w/o the interviews). But maybe that *was* what Tim meant too and he was saying the crits often didn't -- but then maybe i've just missed all the bad Tori-crit or lumped it in with bad X-crit and not looked at how gender plays a part in making it a *difft* sort of bad-crit.

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

"gender cracks"!

Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Monday, 16 February 2004 15:36 (twenty-two years ago)

naomi: but what about when hitchcock was seen as a b-movie hack but still popular -- isn't that something interesting too, not just the invalidation of hitchcock but the by-implication invalidation of hitchcock *fans* (or even just ppl. who wouldn't even call themselves fans but liked his movies more than x y or z snoozer prestige picture?)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Monday, 16 February 2004 15:38 (twenty-two years ago)

Well, what was more important for Hitchcock, being popular and being given money to make the films that he made, or (not) being liked by small coterie of critics who later admitted they got it wrong?

Do you really think many people liked Hitchcock but felt "invalidated" because the critics didn't agree? Surely the solution to that isn't critics getting it right but people feeling less apologetic about liking what they like?

Naomi, Monday, 16 February 2004 16:14 (twenty-two years ago)

Actually I think Tori contributes to the problem - what i dislike is how there's this idea that women just emote through their music and then the audience receives that like a straight feed into their hearts (or bowels if they dislike it). There's rarely any discussion of the texturology of emotions or sexuality or femininity. Equating emoting with craft or craft with emoting is a step upwards but still not far enough.

ie. hardly anyone *ever* talks about the sexual or emotional content of female-produced music the way they might about, say, Maxinquaye or Vocalcity etc.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:52 (twenty-two years ago)

what's the music equiv. of a woman in a power suit and is anyone threatened by it?

maybe its becuz of my own bias towards the upwardly mobile (some might find that ironic), but I'd equate this with folks trying to make MONEY more so than art. So I guess I'd say Britney Spears, Mandy Moore, Jessica Simpson (ESPECIALLY - read the new Blender article for scary-ass proof), stuff like that. Arguably Madonna is the real pioneer here (though my love of You Can Dance demands I point out she's like, a great disco diva too) Yeah sure they're not wearing power suits, but in a theatrical world like pop music, next to nothing is on some level a power suit, it's what you wear to move up. It's not like the dudes are dressing much classier. And yeah people are threatened by it.

Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 00:58 (twenty-two years ago)

Okay Tim so who are some female artists who are victims of rather than contributors to this problem?

(Actually, Tori is victim victimizer and benificiary all at once.)

(And also for this problem.)

Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 17 February 2004 02:24 (twenty-two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.