Who else finds Bob Dylan rather dull?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm going out in a minute, and I look forward to the inevitable torrent of abuse when I get home drunk.

Wooden, Friday, 23 July 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"inevitable"? Has this place become that canonical in the last year or so? I don't care for dylan at all.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Lots of stupid people, I should think.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)

"Positively 4th Street" is good, if only for having one 8-bar section that repeats over and over, and, um . . . "Tangled Up In Blue," I guess, but otherwise I can't abide Dylan. Never owned one of his albums and can't imagine I ever will. And I'm hardly some music snob.

phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Like Dylan or don't, but calling him dull is an entirely misinformed accusation.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm sorry, but if you can't see the genius in Dylan's songwriting and singing, you're a bonehead, and fur5ther I suspect your low opinion of Dylan has to do with (erronious) associations with what you think he represents rather than the music itself. Postiively 4th and Tangled just barely scratch the surface.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Dylan is a brilliant songwriter, but much like Springsteen I don't have much use for him personally.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Dylan has upwards of 20 great singles, which is more than most songwriters will ever have, but I would never listen to a Dylan album all the way through.

joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)

For me personally, I didn't have a lot of use for Dylan when I was younger, I only owned the early stuff and I didn't play it a lot, but as I got older I found that I had a LOT of use for him. Is this common?

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not really interested in what he represents, or in what you think I think he represents. I don't care for his music, that's all.

phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)

And just how did you glean from what I wrote what I think he represents, or how I think he's erroneously associated with it? Do I know you or something?

phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

dude we already have like 1,500 bob dylan threads, what's the point of this one?!

amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)

1,501 Dylan threads can't be wrong!

scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Well, he can be fascinating, he can be dull,
He can ride down Niagara Falls in the barrels of your skull."

sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Nope, I just don't see how anyone who likes music couldn't see it. I really don't. It's a bit like saying "well, Shakespeare is alright, I like 'Othello" and "Rome and Juliet,' but..." Seriously. We're talking about an enormous body of work that has influenced everyone, even if they don't even realize it.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)

waaah, Moby Dick is too long and who cares about whales anyhow.

sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

TONS of people hate Dylan:

Is Bob Dylan overrated?

Defend the indefensible - Bob Dylan.

Why don't I like Bob Dylan?

I (heart) Dylan, myself. I don't, however, (heart) statements like "I'm sorry, but if you can't see the genius in Dylan's songwriting and singing, you're a bonehead, and fur5ther I suspect your low opinion of Dylan has to do with (erronious) associations with what you think he represents rather than the music itself." Tons of inteligent ppl don't think Dylan's a genius, and many of those are well versed in his work.

(xpost there's also tons of inteligent ppl who don't like Shakespeare, shookout!)

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)

"Well, Shakespeare, he's in the alley
With his pointed shoes and his bells,
Speaking to some French girl,
Who says she knows me well."

sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Plenty of the music I like has no discernable dylan influence. Personally, I just find his singing voice excruciating.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus, Dylan didn't write any of his songs, it was Kit Marlowe!

jedidiah (jedidiah), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)

making any artist "holy" (i.e. saying that if you don't think he's great you're WRONG almost by definition) is terribly unfair against the artist, because it's bound to make tons of people hate him/her. It's also terribly unfair to me because many of these ppl will then go on to tell everyone "you know who *I* hate? BOB DYLAN!!!" with a smug look on their face and expect them to react with shocked screams of "THIS CANNOT BE POSSIBLE, WHAT SORT OF STRANGE, FASCINATING INDIVIDUALIST ARE YOU???", and god I really really really really really hate that shit.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"And now I know you're dissatisfied
With your position and your place
Don't you understand
It's not my problem

I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
And just for that one moment
I could be you

Yes, I wish that for just one time
You could stand inside my shoes
You'd know what a drag it is
To see you"

sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)

haha daniel rf otm

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I have this wonderful, abiding, endless blind love for many artists and I of course don't think people are stupid for not liking them, because if anything that line-in-the-sand thinking takes the fun out of a spirited debate. Besides, the attitude displayed above is more likely to make people say "okay now I really don't like him!" whereas a more generous attitude, debating the music, trying to get people to see where you're coming from, might in fact help someone gain a new appreciation for his music.

Don't try it with me, though. Dylan's bollox.

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I find Bob Dylan's music (and, yes, his lyrics also) rather excruciatingly bland. In the many numerous encounters I've had with his music over the years, he has yet to put a smile on my face or a tear in my beer with his ramblings. I however can see quite clearly why so many people not as fucked up in the soul as I am enjoy/appreciate his work. I can also see quite clearly his influence on artists who I love. And I keep trying, hoping that one day there'll be that epiphanous moment where It All Makes Sense, but so far, that has yet to happen.

nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)

It too about nine beers and following along with the lyric sheet to Blood on the Tracks a few years back to finally convert me to Dylan. He's an amazing lyrcisit and, at least in his early catalog, has an uncanny ability to match the narrative with the music. It all sounds wonderful and appropriate.

Chris O., Friday, 23 July 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)

There's an alternate version of the scenario that daniel rf describes though, which is the zealous dylan fan, who I have enocuntered a couple of times - "you can't not like dylan!" "Man, you've got to listen to this" (puts on dylan rekkid) "what about this! This is classic!!" (puts on another dylan rekkid) etc etc.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)

at one point I owned a few CDs or LPs (Highway 61, Bringing It All Back Home, Desire, Time Out of Mind) and the only one I still have is the soundtrack to Pat Garrett and Billy the Kid, mostly because that's one of my favorite films from that time...

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Pashima, this alternate version was what I was raging against in my post, as it is the source of the version I described! If there weren't zealous fans there probably wouldn't be smug deriders either.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)

What musicians do you think occupy that lukewarm "neither here nor there" middleground?

Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Dylan is a brilliant songwriter, but much like Springsteen I don't have much use for him personally.

Ah, nobly and perfectly summed up. Said before and will say again that Dylan is best covered.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

you're a complex dude, ned.

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I suspect my just posted comment on the Springsteen thread will have you saying other things.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Hi Ned, how was your vacation!? Sincerely, your friend the Dylanfan, Scott

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)

It was very nice! I will post something about it on ILE after dinner.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Glad to hear it. Maria and I welcomed the Eddy clan to the island while ILX was on hiatus. We had a rousing 4th of July on the beach. His kids are the koolest.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)

oh you're back? well, welcome back then!

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I R indeed back. Venezuela was fab, etc.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry i initially welcomed you back by hurling invective!

amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:38 (twenty-one years ago)

like a lot of canonical artists, sometimes their reputation brings people into it thinking that theyre taking part in something very serious and they dont see the humanity or humor in it. i dont expect everyone to bow down to dylan asmuch as i tend to do (though i dont as much as soem) but i think it helps to try to forget the hype for a second and just approach the music like you would any other record. a lot of what appeals to me about dylan isnt necessarily in the lyrics but how he delivers them, the charcter he brings to it. lines liek "with a faaaaaaaaantastic collection of stamps" give me chills or make me giggle every time. i think its also important to think of what he tries to do is to bring the eeriness, the weirdness, and overall feeling of "real" folk music into a rock n roll setting (talkin' mid-to-late 60s stuff mostly blues) and i think he does it better than anyone, avoiding being exploitative to the roots of his music. make any sense?

tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)

You know it balances on your head just like a mattress balances on a bottle of wine.

earlnash, Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)

sorry i initially welcomed you back by hurling invective!

Oh, I was as much at fault, fret not.

There were actually two late sixties Dylan photo postcards I saw on vacation that actually really worked for me in terms of image, in that he was clearly laughing and having fun. As Tom notes, it's this kind of humor which is so missing in the Hilburnesque encomiums of the world towards Dylan, or else treated with such solemnity as to defuse said humor in any event.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned, you've obviously never read my canonical essay on Dylan and Baltimore house music. (just kidding, don't read it. I wuz drunk.)

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh my god, deja vu, I'm drunk right now!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

"As Tom notes, it's this kind of humor which is so missing in the Hilburnesque encomiums of the world towards Dylan, or else treated with such solemnity as to defuse said humor in any event."

Well, wasn't it Smokey robinson who, when asked who he thought was the greatest comedian in America, replied Bob Dylan?

de, Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a hard time imagining someone finding Dylan "dull," though I can EASILY see why someone would find him actively repellent.

As Tom notes, it's this kind of humor which is so missing in the Hilburnesque encomiums of the world towards Dylan, or else treated with such solemnity as to defuse said humor in any event.

I think this comment is very OTM - I've always found Dylan VERY funny, more often than I've ever found him, you know, "moving" and "profound" and all that stuff (though he is sometimes that as well). I remember hearing an album for the first time and expecting to hear some po-faced geezer like Leonard Cohen - while some of the early "Times They Are A-Changin'" (always my least favorite "major" Dylan song) era stuff did come off like that, most of it was delightfully playful and inventive and exciting - more akin to Wire and The Fall than Donovan. Speaking as someone who doesn't much care for the whole acoustic singer-songwriter thing OR any of the "new Dylans" (Cohen, Young, Springsteen, etc), Dylan is the only canonical '60s artist I can't see myself ever getting sick of, as long as I don't read another one of those MOJO cover stories.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"po-faced geezer like Leonard Cohen"

Leonard Cohen is REALLY funny!

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I'm willing to have my mind changed on that one (my first impression of Dylan turned out to be wrong, after all) - what's worth checking out?

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Buy Songs Of Love And Hate. It's the bomb. He just has the greatest delivery. He would have been the best stand-up comic that ever lived.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

In my opinion, being funny, poetic, AND scary is a gift from god:

"Dress Rehearsal Rag"

Four o'clock in the afternoon
and I didn't feel like very much.
I said to myself, "Where are you golden boy,
where is your famous golden touch?"
I thought you knew where
all of the elephants lie down,
I thought you were the crown prince
of all the wheels in Ivory Town.
Just take a look at your body now,
there's nothing much to save
and a bitter voice in the mirror cries,
"Hey, Prince, you need a shave."
Now if you can manage to get
your trembling fingers to behave,
why don't you try unwrapping
a stainless steel razor blade?
That's right, it's come to this,
yes it's come to this,
and wasn't it a long way down,
wasn't it a strange way down?
There's no hot water
and the cold is running thin.
Well, what do you expect from
the kind of places you've been living in?
Don't drink from that cup,
it's all caked and cracked along the rim.
That's not the electric light, my friend,
that is your vision growing dim.
Cover up your face with soap, there,
now you're Santa Claus.
And you've got a gift for anyone
who will give you his applaus e.
I thought you were a racing man,
ah, but you couldn't take the pace.
That's a funeral in the mirror
and it's stopping at your face.
That's right, it's come to this,
yes it's come to this,
and wasn't it a long way down,
ah wasn't it a strange way down?

Once there was a path
and a girl with chestnut hair,
and you passed the summers
picking all of the berries that grew there;
there were times she was a woman,
oh, there were times she was just a child,
and you held her in the shadows
where the raspberries grow wild.
And you climbed the twilight mountains
and you sang about the view,
and everywhere that you wandered
love seemed to go along with you.
That's a hard one to remember,
yes it makes you clench your fist.
And then the veins stand out like highways,
all along your wrist.
And yes it's come to this,
it's come to this,
and wasn't it a long way down,
wasn't it a strange way down?

You can still find a job,
go out and talk to a friend.
On the back of every magazine
there are those coupons you can send.
Why don't you join the Rosicrucians,
they can give you back your hope,
you can find your love with diagrams
on a plain brown envelope.
But you've used up all your coupons
except the one that seems
to be written on your wrist
along with several thousand dreams.
Now Santa Claus comes forward,
that's a razor in his mit;
and he puts on his dark glasses
and he shows you where to hit;
and then the cameras pan,
the stand in stunt man,
dress rehearsal rag,
it's just the dress rehearsal rag,
you know this dress rehearsal rag,
it's just a dress rehearsal rag.

scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Zimmerman's also a Jew fwiw (along w/me - so maybe it helps to be a Jew!)

Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:16 (nineteen years ago)

I love Robert Plant's version of "One More Cup of Coffee". (Don't think I know the original.)

Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:17 (nineteen years ago)

Psychedelic Meltzer here - not the clearest thing in the world, but he does seem to be talking about the musical composition itself re. "One of Us Must Know (Sooner or Later)":

"Proto-retrospective vision of all the gears and all the metaphoric functional gears never capable of concretion. Woo-wee! Surely, Dylan's greatest, bar none."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:33 (nineteen years ago)

The gears - you know, tongues and all that. "Proto-retrospective vision" I guess meaning pre-White Album?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:35 (nineteen years ago)

"Zimmerman's also a Jew fwiw"

Well to be fair he's been a lot of things.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:37 (nineteen years ago)

(OK, he might have been talking about lyrics there. Impossible to parse without knowing. I am sure Meltzer would make a claim for Dylan on musical terms.)

xp

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:39 (nineteen years ago)

IN FACT, he includes "One of Us Must Know" on his list of Zeitgeist period examples of rock "when it's totally, gloriously on," which "can go from A to Z - no sweat - instantaneously."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:42 (nineteen years ago)

I think it's a more difficult concept to explain rather than grasp, if you get what I mean. The excitement that an artist generates when they emerge is greater than afterwards, because at the time their story is just beginning and full of possibilities. This is above and beyond any excitement in the actual music.

There was obviously something very exciting about Dylan at the time, and I think (I wasn't there) alot of it was bound in his personality image, crypticism, the fact that he appeared to see more and understand more than both the previous generation and even his own generation.

For me, that excitement isn't primarily located in his music (maybe more in his words), so as I wasn't around to witness his emergence and having mainly his records to refer to, I do not particularly thrill to him.

I still don't get why this would only apply to Dylan, though. Or perhaps it doesn't. You might feel the same way about the Beatles, or punk or disco or old school rap, etc. But this would take the sting (or the pointedness or -- ohgodamireallygoingtousethisword? -- the relevance) out of most anything different or groundbreaking in the past, wouldn't it? It seems insulting to younger audiences, somehow: "well, you could never really get this stuff as it happened before your time!" But really, what Mordechai Shinefield said...

As to "bullying", well this forum isn't any different to any internet forum in that respect.

True. Here, though, it can be an especially fine, if annoying, art. I'm not really talking about insults and flames, just the piling on that sometimes happens (or appears to happen if an opinion is particularly unpopular).

David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:46 (nineteen years ago)

Also, in place of being there, we have some numerous documentaries that impart a sense of the times (No Direction Home, Don't Look Back, etc) and provide some context, arguably as much as we need. That's debatable, since they are by necessity framed narrowly, but then again, from the perspective of one person, so is life. I know people who lived through the late '70s thing in England and hardly let punk touch them -- only becoming interested, if at all, much later.

David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:59 (nineteen years ago)

"some numerous"?

David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:00 (nineteen years ago)

JAYMC-

CHESS WAS AN INDIE LABEL

Death Mask (deathmask), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)

"Again, why are his songs so rarely covered today?"

Prince covered one at the Superbowl a couple days ago.

Sang Freud (jeff_s), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:28 (nineteen years ago)

I wouldn't exactly call him dull, but overrated, yes. His early acoustic albums were downright dull, and after that, the only really good albums of his are those three ones subscribing to a place in every single best-ever-albums survey.

I still haven't quite gotten a grip on why his past three albums are considered so fantastic. On the other hand, I do have a soft spot for "Infidels", which may be his only underrated album (and which would have been better with "Blind Willie McTell" included)

Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:26 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.expectingrain.com/dok/who/images/soybomb.jpg

timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:35 (nineteen years ago)

something spectucularly wrong about him/his music. and i still find him dull. so, yes.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:38 (nineteen years ago)

alfred upthread is otm about dylan's vox, which for me are key to getting the guy. not that it's NOT about his lyrics (the best of which are really great) or his tunes (ditto), because it's about those things to. dylan's songs still sound good when other people do them. but they don't sound like dylan, which is the thing that dylan-lovers love. i said in my jackin pop comments that the new record is primarily a vocal record, and that's how i hear it. the songs are pretty good, a few of them are great, but his singing is so good i could listen for hours. so, you know, people who don't like his singing don't like his singing. there are people who don't like billie holliday's singing too. they're not wrong. they just hear something different than what i hear.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:45 (nineteen years ago)

("those thing too", i mean)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:46 (nineteen years ago)

("those things too", i mean. oh nevermind.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:46 (nineteen years ago)

i just like his voice and mike bloomfield

-- senator second p. newcastle (a|e...), Today 4:28 PM. (a_p) (later) (link)

senator second p. newcastle (a_p), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:58 (nineteen years ago)

that too.

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:00 (nineteen years ago)

I think I've linked it before, but I really love this Alex Ross article about Dylan--note particularly the final quarter or so, where he talks about how Dylan's music works in the service of his words. Sample quote: "The disturbing gospel number 'In The Garden' shows the agony of Jesus in the Garden of Gethsemane by wandering through ten different chords, each one like a betrayal. 'Idiot Wind,' the centerpiece of 'Blood on the Tracks,' channels its universal rage — 'Someone's got it in for me, they're planting stories in the press' — into a single harmonic convulsion: each verse of the G-major song begins with a grinding C-minor chord, which is like a slap to the ear."

Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:00 (nineteen years ago)

there are people who don't like billie holliday's singing too. they're not wrong.

Um, yes they are.

Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:01 (nineteen years ago)

(weirdly, my dylan-loving dad doesn't like billie holiday. not that they're musically alike, but it seems to me the things that might put people off bille would be less likely to put off a dylan fan.)

gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:03 (nineteen years ago)

"Zimmerman's also a Jew fwiw"

Well to be fair he's been a lot of things.

-- Alex in SF (clobberthesauru...), February 8th, 2007.

Dylan's the original David Bowie!

Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:18 (nineteen years ago)

oh, fuck this thread.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:27 (nineteen years ago)

Can't be bothered to trawl through this thread in its doubtless tedious entirety, but I do have a query; does Dylan write his own links for the Theme Time Radio Hour programmes?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:35 (nineteen years ago)

"I still don't get why this would only apply to Dylan, though. Or perhaps it doesn't. You might feel the same way about the Beatles, or punk or disco or old school rap, etc. But this would take the sting (or the pointedness or -- ohgodamireallygoingtousethisword? -- the relevance) out of most anything different or groundbreaking in the past, wouldn't it? It seems insulting to younger audiences, somehow: "well, you could never really get this stuff as it happened before your time!" But really, what Mordechai Shinefield said..."

Well, David, it just seems to me that there was a kind of "messianic" aura around Dylan in the 60s and 70s, that was subtley different to that around any other artist/band. I think Dylan himself has been dismissive of this, but I sense that people "believed" in him in a way they didn't with other artists. I've seen Don't Look Back(sic?) and it is interesting how everyone seems to be hanging on to his every word, no matter how commonplace.

Personally, as I don't buy into Dylan the visionary, I can only judge the music on its own merits. And to me it seems it bit dull. This may be my loss etc., but there you go.

Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 12:09 (nineteen years ago)

it's your loss, period.

the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:50 (nineteen years ago)

lol @ rock fans dissing the blues for being "repetitive"

m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:55 (nineteen years ago)

I think you focus a bit too much on the groundbreaking thingy, which is not really that important, except maybe from a historical Mojo type of perspective.
If you can't see beyond that and hear the way Dylan plays with intonations, the mindblowing lyrics, the understated sarcasm, the comedy, etc, then you're really missing out. Schade

is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:57 (nineteen years ago)

Funny, I've never bothered with Dylan either and I don't feel that bereft.

Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

Bob Dylan = musical marmite, it seems.

Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:02 (nineteen years ago)

BTW,from Wiki:

Marmite is a British savoury spread made from yeast extract, a by-product of beer brewing. It is a sticky, dark brown paste with a distinctive, powerful taste that polarises consumer opinion.

Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)

Nah, I don't feel as strongly about Dylan as I do about Marmite

Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:07 (nineteen years ago)

*raises hand in response to initial question*

I have his greatest hits on one side of a c90. it's...ok, I suppose. haven't fancied listening to it for many years. high praise indeed.

but I'm not that much into lyrics, which may be a substantial barrier to my enjoyment of bob.

m the g (mister the guanoman), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:08 (nineteen years ago)

Baaderonixx OTM

I think Phil is assuming that Dylan's supposed cultural importance during the late 60s must validate the value of his music to contemporary listeners. But this is misguided and unrealistic. It doesn't have to and it often won't. At the same time, he's looking to the music to convince him of this hallowed socio-cultural significance, and obviously he's not finding the same parallels he would have 40 years ago. This is expected. But assuming that you have to buy into the cult of Dylan to appreciate the depth of his songwriting and the brilliance of his simplicity is doing a disservice to art. Don't get too caught up in context. It's not about listening more closely, it's about widening your perspective.

Don Nightingale (don.nightingale), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:16 (nineteen years ago)

JAYMC-

CHESS WAS AN INDIE LABEL

Umm, what does this have to do with anything?

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)

It's very easy for me to understand why someone wouldn't like Bob Dylan, though he's one of my favorites. I mean, his music has its grating aspects. Contrary to most discussion on here, I think I listen to Bob Dylan more for the sound of his records-- including his voice-- than the lyrics. The really famous stuff from the mid-60s, I think a lot of those words are more sound than meaning anyway. But I love the organ sounds, drum sounds, guitar sounds on Highway 61 and Blonde on Blonde. And his singing and songwriting have so much energy. But something like "Maggie's Farm," I can't stand that song, and probably the way that song makes me feel is similar to the way others who dislike Dylan hear his whole catalog. I like his pop goofs -- "The Mighty Quinn" and stuff like that. "It ain't my cup of meat" isn't profound, but it is funny. He's really good at just messing around. Also, when I used to play guitar, his songs were very fun to play.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)

I think I listen to Bob Dylan more for the sound of his records-- including his voice-- than the lyrics. The really famous stuff from the mid-60s, I think a lot of those words are more sound than meaning anyway. But I love the organ sounds, drum sounds, guitar sounds on Highway 61 and Blonde on Blonde. And his singing and songwriting have so much energy.

yes!

whatever i do, it's right (teenagequiet), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:51 (nineteen years ago)

Mark's post makes me want to give Dylan another listen. Especially "those words are more sound than meaning."

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:53 (nineteen years ago)

You ask for ashtrays, can't you reach?

sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:56 (nineteen years ago)

maybe more poetic effect than meaning

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)

yes!

-- whatever i do, it's right (teenagequie...), February 8th, 2007. (later)

Mark's post makes me want to give Dylan another listen. Especially "those words are more sound than meaning."
-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), February 8th, 2007

I've been saying this for a day now! HIs lyrics are only one element. I mean, Bernard Sumner is one of my favorite lyricists, if that's an indication.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, I know you said it, too, Alfred. No offense, but Mark's recommendation means a little bit more to me knowing what he usually likes. I mean, Mark is a total whore for SOUND. And maybe you are, too, except the only instrumental stuff you like is Eno/Hassell.

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:08 (nineteen years ago)

The conversation re blues too, I mean, another area of music that some will understandably find boring. And yeah, Alligator Records, I mean, I've seen the Kinsey Report a few times. Those guys can all play, but the 12-bar form can get tiresome. There's something that clicks in my head when I'm in the wrong mood, where the song goes to that classic turnaround to get from the V back to the I chord, it can just drive you crazy with how predictable it is. I think I like that stuff more b/c of the sound too!

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)

There's a good interview somewhere with Frank Black, where he talks about the drumming in "Stuck Inside of Mobile with the Memphis Blues Again," and how the song is almost a duet between Bob Dylan and the drummer, how the fills are really part of the story. Totally rang true when I read that.

Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)

hahah that's a pretty perceptive point that mr. black made there, actually. means i'll have to listen to the track just now, but blonde on blonde is always good for a retread, any day of the week

Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:19 (nineteen years ago)

does Dylan write his own links for the Theme Time Radio Hour programmes?

I can't answer your question directly, Marcello, but the following links may help.

show credits:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_Time_Radio_Hour#Theme_Time_Radio_Hour_show_credits

part of a production diary:
http://leeabrams.blogspot.com/2006/04/dylan-diary-part-two.html

These programmes deserve their own ILM thread, if there isn't one already.

zebedee (zebedee), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:39 (nineteen years ago)

Excellent posts from Baadertronix, Mark and Don Nightingale. Really made me think.

Baader - I have heard "Blood On The Tracks". I love "Tangled Up In Blue" but after that, errrrrr.....

That's the thing. If the majority of Dylan's output was as purely enjoyable as "Tangled", "Visions of Johanna", "As I Went Out One Morning", I'd have no problem with him. But the majority of his work just doesn't seem to swing like those songs too.

I suppose if I was to unfairly single out a song that (to me) emphasises the worst aspects of Dylan, it would be something like "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest". Now it may be that this song is as many-layered as an onion, but to my ears it sounds like a bit of a shaggy-dog story set to a jaunty but by no means exemplary tune that doesn't really go anywhere.

Of course, that may be where I'm missing the essence of Dylan; that, as with Sterne, where he doesn't go is just as important (if not more so) as where he does go. But doesn't that make a true appreciation of Dylan somewhat rareified? (Think Mark is hinting at this?)

Phil Knight (PhilK), Friday, 9 February 2007 21:27 (nineteen years ago)

I mean, Mark is a total whore for SOUND. And maybe you are, too, except the only instrumental stuff you like is Eno/Hassell.

So if you like sound you must like instrumentals? Or an instrumental fan appreciates sound? Anyway, I have no idea what "instrumental" means in this context, since I own tons of jazz.

That's the thing. If the majority of Dylan's output was as purely enjoyable as "Tangled", "Visions of Johanna", "As I Went Out One Morning", I'd have no problem with him. But the majority of his work just doesn't seem to swing like those songs too.

You really need to listen to John Wesley Harding and Blood on the Tracks in their entirety. The minor works, filled with failed mainstream accomodations and grotesque sellouts, have their charms too (I recommended Empire Burlesque), in large part because there's no aura with which to suffocate the listener.

My Lou Reed fandom is a lot like my Dylan: their throwaways are often more revealing than their classics.

Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 February 2007 21:33 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.