― Wooden, Friday, 23 July 2004 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:50 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 15:52 (twenty-one years ago)
― Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:53 (twenty-one years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 15:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― joseph cotten (joseph cotten), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:02 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:03 (twenty-one years ago)
― phil dennison, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:05 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:06 (twenty-one years ago)
― sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― shookout (shookout), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:09 (twenty-one years ago)
― sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
Is Bob Dylan overrated?
Defend the indefensible - Bob Dylan.
Why don't I like Bob Dylan?
I (heart) Dylan, myself. I don't, however, (heart) statements like "I'm sorry, but if you can't see the genius in Dylan's songwriting and singing, you're a bonehead, and fur5ther I suspect your low opinion of Dylan has to do with (erronious) associations with what you think he represents rather than the music itself." Tons of inteligent ppl don't think Dylan's a genius, and many of those are well versed in his work.
(xpost there's also tons of inteligent ppl who don't like Shakespeare, shookout!)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:11 (twenty-one years ago)
― sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:13 (twenty-one years ago)
― jedidiah (jedidiah), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:14 (twenty-one years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:17 (twenty-one years ago)
I wish that for just one timeYou could stand inside my shoesAnd just for that one momentI could be you
Yes, I wish that for just one timeYou could stand inside my shoesYou'd know what a drag it isTo see you"
― sexyDancer, Friday, 23 July 2004 16:19 (twenty-one years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:20 (twenty-one years ago)
Don't try it with me, though. Dylan's bollox.
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:25 (twenty-one years ago)
― nickalicious (nickalicious), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:26 (twenty-one years ago)
― Chris O., Friday, 23 July 2004 16:29 (twenty-one years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Gear! (Gear!), Friday, 23 July 2004 16:38 (twenty-one years ago)
Ah, nobly and perfectly summed up. Said before and will say again that Dylan is best covered.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:36 (twenty-one years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:37 (twenty-one years ago)
― amateur!st (amateurist), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:38 (twenty-one years ago)
― tom cleveland (tom cleveland), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:48 (twenty-one years ago)
― earlnash, Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:53 (twenty-one years ago)
Oh, I was as much at fault, fret not.
There were actually two late sixties Dylan photo postcards I saw on vacation that actually really worked for me in terms of image, in that he was clearly laughing and having fun. As Tom notes, it's this kind of humor which is so missing in the Hilburnesque encomiums of the world towards Dylan, or else treated with such solemnity as to defuse said humor in any event.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 24 July 2004 00:57 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:04 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)
Well, wasn't it Smokey robinson who, when asked who he thought was the greatest comedian in America, replied Bob Dylan?
― de, Saturday, 24 July 2004 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)
As Tom notes, it's this kind of humor which is so missing in the Hilburnesque encomiums of the world towards Dylan, or else treated with such solemnity as to defuse said humor in any event.
I think this comment is very OTM - I've always found Dylan VERY funny, more often than I've ever found him, you know, "moving" and "profound" and all that stuff (though he is sometimes that as well). I remember hearing an album for the first time and expecting to hear some po-faced geezer like Leonard Cohen - while some of the early "Times They Are A-Changin'" (always my least favorite "major" Dylan song) era stuff did come off like that, most of it was delightfully playful and inventive and exciting - more akin to Wire and The Fall than Donovan. Speaking as someone who doesn't much care for the whole acoustic singer-songwriter thing OR any of the "new Dylans" (Cohen, Young, Springsteen, etc), Dylan is the only canonical '60s artist I can't see myself ever getting sick of, as long as I don't read another one of those MOJO cover stories.
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)
Leonard Cohen is REALLY funny!
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:33 (twenty-one years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)
"Dress Rehearsal Rag"
Four o'clock in the afternoon and I didn't feel like very much. I said to myself, "Where are you golden boy, where is your famous golden touch?" I thought you knew where all of the elephants lie down, I thought you were the crown prince of all the wheels in Ivory Town. Just take a look at your body now, there's nothing much to save and a bitter voice in the mirror cries, "Hey, Prince, you need a shave." Now if you can manage to get your trembling fingers to behave, why don't you try unwrapping a stainless steel razor blade? That's right, it's come to this, yes it's come to this, and wasn't it a long way down, wasn't it a strange way down? There's no hot water and the cold is running thin. Well, what do you expect from the kind of places you've been living in? Don't drink from that cup, it's all caked and cracked along the rim. That's not the electric light, my friend, that is your vision growing dim. Cover up your face with soap, there, now you're Santa Claus. And you've got a gift for anyone who will give you his applaus e. I thought you were a racing man, ah, but you couldn't take the pace. That's a funeral in the mirror and it's stopping at your face. That's right, it's come to this, yes it's come to this, and wasn't it a long way down, ah wasn't it a strange way down?
Once there was a path and a girl with chestnut hair, and you passed the summers picking all of the berries that grew there; there were times she was a woman, oh, there were times she was just a child, and you held her in the shadows where the raspberries grow wild. And you climbed the twilight mountains and you sang about the view, and everywhere that you wandered love seemed to go along with you. That's a hard one to remember, yes it makes you clench your fist. And then the veins stand out like highways, all along your wrist. And yes it's come to this, it's come to this, and wasn't it a long way down, wasn't it a strange way down?
You can still find a job, go out and talk to a friend. On the back of every magazine there are those coupons you can send. Why don't you join the Rosicrucians, they can give you back your hope, you can find your love with diagrams on a plain brown envelope. But you've used up all your coupons except the one that seems to be written on your wrist along with several thousand dreams. Now Santa Claus comes forward, that's a razor in his mit; and he puts on his dark glasses and he shows you where to hit; and then the cameras pan, the stand in stunt man, dress rehearsal rag, it's just the dress rehearsal rag, you know this dress rehearsal rag, it's just a dress rehearsal rag.
― scott seward (scott seward), Saturday, 24 July 2004 02:56 (twenty-one years ago)
― Shakey Mo Collier (Shakey Mo Collier), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:16 (nineteen years ago)
― Sundar (sundar), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:17 (nineteen years ago)
"Proto-retrospective vision of all the gears and all the metaphoric functional gears never capable of concretion. Woo-wee! Surely, Dylan's greatest, bar none."
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:35 (nineteen years ago)
Well to be fair he's been a lot of things.
― Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:37 (nineteen years ago)
xp
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:39 (nineteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:42 (nineteen years ago)
There was obviously something very exciting about Dylan at the time, and I think (I wasn't there) alot of it was bound in his personality image, crypticism, the fact that he appeared to see more and understand more than both the previous generation and even his own generation.
For me, that excitement isn't primarily located in his music (maybe more in his words), so as I wasn't around to witness his emergence and having mainly his records to refer to, I do not particularly thrill to him.
I still don't get why this would only apply to Dylan, though. Or perhaps it doesn't. You might feel the same way about the Beatles, or punk or disco or old school rap, etc. But this would take the sting (or the pointedness or -- ohgodamireallygoingtousethisword? -- the relevance) out of most anything different or groundbreaking in the past, wouldn't it? It seems insulting to younger audiences, somehow: "well, you could never really get this stuff as it happened before your time!" But really, what Mordechai Shinefield said...
As to "bullying", well this forum isn't any different to any internet forum in that respect.
True. Here, though, it can be an especially fine, if annoying, art. I'm not really talking about insults and flames, just the piling on that sometimes happens (or appears to happen if an opinion is particularly unpopular).
― David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:46 (nineteen years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 00:59 (nineteen years ago)
― David A. (Davant), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:00 (nineteen years ago)
CHESS WAS AN INDIE LABEL
― Death Mask (deathmask), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:12 (nineteen years ago)
Prince covered one at the Superbowl a couple days ago.
― Sang Freud (jeff_s), Thursday, 8 February 2007 01:28 (nineteen years ago)
I still haven't quite gotten a grip on why his past three albums are considered so fantastic. On the other hand, I do have a soft spot for "Infidels", which may be his only underrated album (and which would have been better with "Blind Willie McTell" included)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:26 (nineteen years ago)
― timmy tannin (pompous), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:38 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:45 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:46 (nineteen years ago)
-- senator second p. newcastle (a|e...), Today 4:28 PM. (a_p) (later) (link)
― senator second p. newcastle (a_p), Thursday, 8 February 2007 04:58 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:00 (nineteen years ago)
Um, yes they are.
― Beth Parker (Beth Parker), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:01 (nineteen years ago)
― gypsy mothra (gypsy mothra), Thursday, 8 February 2007 05:03 (nineteen years ago)
-- Alex in SF (clobberthesauru...), February 8th, 2007.
Dylan's the original David Bowie!
― Frogm@n Henry (Frogm@n Henry), Thursday, 8 February 2007 06:18 (nineteen years ago)
― J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:27 (nineteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 8 February 2007 08:35 (nineteen years ago)
Well, David, it just seems to me that there was a kind of "messianic" aura around Dylan in the 60s and 70s, that was subtley different to that around any other artist/band. I think Dylan himself has been dismissive of this, but I sense that people "believed" in him in a way they didn't with other artists. I've seen Don't Look Back(sic?) and it is interesting how everyone seems to be hanging on to his every word, no matter how commonplace.
Personally, as I don't buy into Dylan the visionary, I can only judge the music on its own merits. And to me it seems it bit dull. This may be my loss etc., but there you go.
― Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 12:09 (nineteen years ago)
― the original hauntology blogging crew (Enrique), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:50 (nineteen years ago)
― m coleman (lovebug starski), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:55 (nineteen years ago)
― is anyone anticipating the new Baaderonixx? (baaderonixx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 13:57 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:02 (nineteen years ago)
Marmite is a British savoury spread made from yeast extract, a by-product of beer brewing. It is a sticky, dark brown paste with a distinctive, powerful taste that polarises consumer opinion.
― Phil Knight (PhilK), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:05 (nineteen years ago)
― Tom D. (Dada), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:07 (nineteen years ago)
I have his greatest hits on one side of a c90. it's...ok, I suppose. haven't fancied listening to it for many years. high praise indeed.
but I'm not that much into lyrics, which may be a substantial barrier to my enjoyment of bob.
― m the g (mister the guanoman), Thursday, 8 February 2007 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
I think Phil is assuming that Dylan's supposed cultural importance during the late 60s must validate the value of his music to contemporary listeners. But this is misguided and unrealistic. It doesn't have to and it often won't. At the same time, he's looking to the music to convince him of this hallowed socio-cultural significance, and obviously he's not finding the same parallels he would have 40 years ago. This is expected. But assuming that you have to buy into the cult of Dylan to appreciate the depth of his songwriting and the brilliance of his simplicity is doing a disservice to art. Don't get too caught up in context. It's not about listening more closely, it's about widening your perspective.
― Don Nightingale (don.nightingale), Thursday, 8 February 2007 15:16 (nineteen years ago)
Umm, what does this have to do with anything?
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:35 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:46 (nineteen years ago)
yes!
― whatever i do, it's right (teenagequiet), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:51 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:53 (nineteen years ago)
― sexyDancer (sexyDancer), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 16:58 (nineteen years ago)
-- whatever i do, it's right (teenagequie...), February 8th, 2007. (later)
Mark's post makes me want to give Dylan another listen. Especially "those words are more sound than meaning."-- jaymc (jmcunnin...), February 8th, 2007
I've been saying this for a day now! HIs lyrics are only one element. I mean, Bernard Sumner is one of my favorite lyricists, if that's an indication.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:05 (nineteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:17 (nineteen years ago)
― Charlie Howard (the sphinx), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
I can't answer your question directly, Marcello, but the following links may help.
show credits:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theme_Time_Radio_Hour#Theme_Time_Radio_Hour_show_credits
part of a production diary:http://leeabrams.blogspot.com/2006/04/dylan-diary-part-two.html
These programmes deserve their own ILM thread, if there isn't one already.
― zebedee (zebedee), Thursday, 8 February 2007 17:39 (nineteen years ago)
Baader - I have heard "Blood On The Tracks". I love "Tangled Up In Blue" but after that, errrrrr.....
That's the thing. If the majority of Dylan's output was as purely enjoyable as "Tangled", "Visions of Johanna", "As I Went Out One Morning", I'd have no problem with him. But the majority of his work just doesn't seem to swing like those songs too.
I suppose if I was to unfairly single out a song that (to me) emphasises the worst aspects of Dylan, it would be something like "The Ballad of Frankie Lee and Judas Priest". Now it may be that this song is as many-layered as an onion, but to my ears it sounds like a bit of a shaggy-dog story set to a jaunty but by no means exemplary tune that doesn't really go anywhere.
Of course, that may be where I'm missing the essence of Dylan; that, as with Sterne, where he doesn't go is just as important (if not more so) as where he does go. But doesn't that make a true appreciation of Dylan somewhat rareified? (Think Mark is hinting at this?)
― Phil Knight (PhilK), Friday, 9 February 2007 21:27 (nineteen years ago)
So if you like sound you must like instrumentals? Or an instrumental fan appreciates sound? Anyway, I have no idea what "instrumental" means in this context, since I own tons of jazz.
You really need to listen to John Wesley Harding and Blood on the Tracks in their entirety. The minor works, filled with failed mainstream accomodations and grotesque sellouts, have their charms too (I recommended Empire Burlesque), in large part because there's no aura with which to suffocate the listener.
My Lou Reed fandom is a lot like my Dylan: their throwaways are often more revealing than their classics.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 9 February 2007 21:33 (nineteen years ago)