Is the best music writing being done on blogs?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I keep hearing people say this, and checking out the supposedly great music bloggers, and while they are entertaining, the writing is really short, ranty, and gets dated really fast (since they're usually reacting to something immediate)...it's kind of like blog writing makes for good samples but not good songs. What do you think?

shookout (shookout), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:13 (twenty years ago)

Well, as with anything it depends on the writer. Someone like Tim Finney, f'r instance, truly shines when it comes to blog posting-as-great writing, straight up. I think it all depends on the quality of the writer as such, and how well they work -- you get a lot of 'the blog will replace the mainstream media' nonsense these days but that's a mistaking of the medium for the contributors' abilities, which can widely vary.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:16 (twenty years ago)

If you're reading short things, then you're missing the point of blogs. Blogs let you stretch out, and most of the great blog pieces I can remember are all like 1000+ words.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:33 (twenty years ago)

Although most of the worst blog pieces I've are also 1000+ words. Without an editor if you lose the plot, you can really really lose the plot.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:36 (twenty years ago)

meta makes us stronger

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

I think I prefer the opposite: blogs as something closer to real-time experiences of music.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Seems closer to what the form itself is all about: keeping a "log."

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 18:39 (twenty years ago)

In the Jess Harvell quote used in the description for the blog panel at the upcoming EMP Pop conference in April, Jess makes the argument that you just have to read blogs.

I've read alot of interesting music writing on blogs (Tim F., the panelists at that session--Jess, Matos, Geeta Dayal, Jay Smooth, Tom Ewing and more), but I've yet to find blogs that cover African and Caribbean music as thoroughly as the Beat magazine, and I've yet to find a blog that covers Ecko/Malaco style Southern soul, or Louisiana roots stuff--brass bands, zydeco.

steve-k, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

So start one.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:20 (twenty years ago)

"In the Jess Harvell quote used in the description for the blog panel at the upcoming EMP Pop conference in April, Jess makes the argument that you just have to read blogs."

As opposed to not reading them or what?

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

The words actually attributed to Mr. Harvell in the blurb for the blog panel: "Jess Harvell opines that 'All that's really exciting in music writing right now — in terms of style, content, delivery, form, function — is coming from either blogs or the interzone between blogs and 'professionals.' I'd be surprised if the landscape and its organisms didn't look completely different in five or ten years.'"

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

Now that makes a lot more sense than the reduction quoted above, I have to say. The question of style, however, intrigues me the most because I think there this is no one 'style' on blogs as there was no one 'style' in print -- that essentially the multiplicity of voices out there reflects wider access but not necessarily as much of a shifting of goalposts as might be imagined.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

Interzone!

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:37 (twenty years ago)

I was waiting for a friend of mine -- and they all arrived at once!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

jess is like some sort of scientist, isn't he?

Senior Executive/CEO (nordicskilla), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

blogs are just zines with a phone attached

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

Not sure what you're getting @, Ned re: "wider access". Unless you're saying the blog 'style' & the print 'style' aren't as far apart as some think (which is true & not true) (ha). As a whole, I'm thinking the one true thing bloggery has to offer to the print media is its off-the-cuff conversational casualness (& sloppiness). Though it's just a ping-ponging effect between one & the other.

Interslice!

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

This fixation on 'exciting' is pure bullshit, and it's the very heart of blogger triumphalism. I write two blogs - an MP3 blog updated M-F, and a regular text-only one that I update once every 4-5 days or so. So I don't loathe the form. But I get really fucking bored with the proselytization and the mainstream music/entertainment media (you know, the writing that people will actually pay to read) allowing itself to be buffaloed by said proselytization. Blogging is this year's trendy new way to masturbate. Now, I'm not condemning masturbation, but it's not exactly a revolutionary act. All blogging really does is further separate one group of people (the owners of home computers with internet connections and lots of free time to surf and post and link) from the rest of society. Now maybe, as with homeschool kids, those people should be kept separate from everyone else, and it's good they came to that conclusion on their own. But bloggers need to get over their fuckin' selves, especially the ones who have only their blogs as outlets for their opinions.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

OTM

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

the quote upthread seems a mite self-congratulatory. anyway, pdf otm

Gear! (can Jung shill it, Mu?) (Gear!), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:10 (twenty years ago)

geeta's the scientist!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Blogging is this year's trendy new way to masturbate.

Never mind that Blogger's been around since, oh, 2000. And that 'zine culture was, in essence, blogging + dead trees. And that, of course, Worthy Media Critics And Other Types emerge fully grown from the ground like Athena, & can hit the ground running working their way up the print food chain like Mom & Dad did because that is The One True Way, and fie on those that either do otherwise or (GOD FORBID) forsake the land of Glossy Paper and Newsprint to find their own way (a way, BTW, you're totally free to ignore, if you can get over YOURself), and sheesh way to not "loathe the form" you spend a whole paragraph pigfucking, Phil. Score one for the blind reading between the lines. Again.

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:13 (twenty years ago)

masturbating vs pigfucking

DON'T MAKE ME CHOOSE!!

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

This is getting a mite strange here. I think on the one hand there's much to be said for the ease of carving out one's own niche in communication that can and will attract likeminded souls who, indeed, have the technical ability and ease to communicate readily. At the same time assuming a tectonic shift that can be recognizable as such and predicted as such is a mugs' game -- consider what was promised for the Net in 1991, then 1994, then what it finally has turned out to be. Things *have* happened that are massive in scope but they are not always the specifics claimed by the prognosticators.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

blogs are just zines with a phone attached

-- miccio (anthonyisright@GEEmail.com ), March 9th, 2005.

i love you miccio

chris andrews (fraew), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

detour/derail maybe (if someone thinks this should be another thread feel free to start it) - what music writers (that get published in tradmedia) have their best writing on their blogs? what music bloggers that don't get published in tradmedia are worth a damn?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:28 (twenty years ago)

I like Jessica Hopper's writing on her blog way more than the two or three articles I've read by her.

jaymc (jaymc), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:30 (twenty years ago)

well that's not setting the bar too high!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:31 (twenty years ago)

geeta's the scientist!

I'm a scientist.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/nsn

Never mind that Blogger's been around since, oh, 2000.

"Bogging" has been around since at least '94, probably even earlier, only it wasn't called blogging. It was just called writing on your webpage.

Crypt Newsletter was never called a blog but that's exactly what it was.

http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt

There were many such things, for all manner of subjects. I was deeply involved in computer security and, eventually, national security issues. A great deal of what I wrote wound up being cited in the mainstream news, on radio, in scholarly papers, etc. The writing generated a book, requests to contribute to other books, editorial writing for the Wall Street Journal and other things.

However, I also had journalism experience at a daily newspaper for years prior to that.

One thing has always been the same. The endless, deadening and antagonizing hype over "the future and meaning" of daily content provided in cyberspace as opposed to old school media. Cyberspace writers are always said to be overturning the slugs and sloths of the old world. Soon there will be no need for anything but computers and web addresses! You old hidebound fucks will all be out of work because you're no damn good! And slow, too!

And prescriptions that you have to read everything in cyberspace, on whatever topic you're specializing in, or you'll not be hip and soon be dumb and obsolete...were easy to come by every week since the mid-90's.

People should rightly be sick of hearing about it. And they should ratchet up the sensitivity nob on their bullshit detectors as soon as it's heard coming. Another sign that the meme is truly well rotted is when it appears reprinted as some triumphant quote or claim in the mainstream media, the examples trotted out as being things you should add to your reading list are always the same two or three. Which means the person writing the article doesn't actually waste their time either combing through the fare in cyberspace, but is responding to groupthink, that which they have seen others write and/or which now resides in Lex-Nex.

George Smith, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

geeta's the scientist!

I'm a scientist.

http://www.globalsecurity.org/org/nsn

Never mind that Blogger's been around since, oh, 2000.

"Blogging" has been around since at least '94, probably even earlier, only it wasn't called blogging. It was just called writing on your webpage.

Crypt Newsletter was never called a blog but that's exactly what it was.

http://www.soci.niu.edu/~crypt

There were many such things, for all manner of subjects. I was deeply involved in computer security and, eventually, national security issues. A great deal of what I wrote wound up being cited in the mainstream news, on radio, in scholarly papers, etc. The writing generated a book, requests to contribute to other books, editorial writing for the Wall Street Journal and other things.

However, I also had journalism experience at a daily newspaper for years prior to that.

One thing has always been the same. The endless, deadening and antagonizing hype over "the future and meaning" of daily content provided in cyberspace as opposed to old school media. Cyberspace writers are always said to be overturning the slugs and sloths of the old world. Soon there will be no need for anything but computers and web addresses! You old hidebound fucks will all be out of work because you're no damn good! And slow, too!

And prescriptions that you have to read everything in cyberspace, on whatever topic you're specializing in, or you'll not be hip and soon be dumb and obsolete...were easy to come by every week since the mid-90's.

People should rightly be sick of hearing about it. And they should ratchet up the sensitivity nob on their bullshit detectors as soon as it's heard coming. Another sign that the meme is truly well rotted is when it appears reprinted as some triumphant quote or claim in the mainstream media, the examples trotted out as being things you should add to your reading list are always the same two or three. Which means the person writing the article doesn't actually waste their time either combing through the fare in cyberspace, but is responding to groupthink, that which they have seen others write and/or which now resides in Lex-Nex.

George Smith, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

Apologies for the double post. Me and my computer malfunctioned.

George Smith, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)

You've got to GET WITH IT, George!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

The thing about most writing in trad published forms is there are usually set conventions and editorial requirements: I write an album review and there usually needs to be references to the placement of the output in respect to their other work, the current 'scene' or context, and then mentions of a few tracks in more detail. Word count. Publication tone. Etc.

So blogging on the same subject allows me to get away from that framework and write whatever I want, in the tone I choose. I guess the emphasis shifts from writing with the reader in mind (which is a must for most journalism), to writing with my own taste and preference dictating it all.

Blogging is this year's trendy new way to masturbate
And....?
I don't see what the problem with people self-indulgently creating personal space for expression is. You just don't click if you don't want to.

Abby (abby mcdonald), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

Wait a sec: blogging + dead trees = zines + phone!

?

David R. (popshots75`), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:27 (twenty years ago)

Abby,

what that sounds like to me is "place where music nerds can talk without having to even try to make what they're saying understood by non-music nerds."

djdee (djdee2005), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:30 (twenty years ago)

I think that it's a mistake to write off blogs as being this trend that is peaking at this moment in time. I think that blogs are only scratching the surface of the form right now.

I look at blogs as being just another medium, but also one that is distinct in form from other venues for writing. I think that the best blogs tend to be the ones that take advantage of the format and do something which could not be done in print media or online equivalents of print media.

I hate the blogger triumphalism, but I think the bloggers who dismiss their own medium and the luddites are even worse.

In regards to professional journalism vs. nonprofessional blogging, I'm just glad that there is a format out there where people who want to write about topics can be taken seriously without having to be a full time writer/freelancer. Not everyone wants to be a journalist, you know? Those people have interesting thoughts too. More interesting thoughts a lot of the time!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:31 (twenty years ago)

>what that sounds like to me is "place where music nerds can talk without having to even try to make what they're saying understood by non-music nerds."

Exactly. And allowing this to influence so-called "mainstream" or traditional journalism is not helpful. Music criticism is bad enough already. It doesn't need to take tips from people who often seem to be actively disdaining the idea of writing with communication in mind.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:35 (twenty years ago)

I guess the emphasis shifts from writing with the reader in mind (which is a must for most journalism),

What? This is overrated. If it were truly the hardline case the only material that would ever get published would be sports, the cartoons, and an astrology column.

George Smith, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:38 (twenty years ago)

I guess the emphasis shifts from writing with the reader in mind (which is a must for most journalism), to writing with my own taste and preference dictating it all.

For me, this would be a strange model. All my writing is there for others to enjoy it as they wish -- I would say that generally speaking more formal writing is more compact, but seeks to be no less informative or engaging. I don't equate a lack of, say, word limits with writing freedom -- not that is what you are specifically suggesting, but it seems a kind of corollary.

xpost I guess! Basically, the idea of a binary that says 'regular journalistic reporting = for the reader/blogging = for the writer' is really pushing it.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)

grr noone will answer my question

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

Can we just be very specific about the blogs we are referring to when we talk about music writing on blogs? It seems that the focus of the discussion here (and in the EMP panel) is on a bunch of blogs that aren't very widely read, while the most popular blogs about music are either mp3 blogs which are written to be extremely accessable to readers, or sites that focus on news and gossip.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

i do wonder what is the most widely read music blog - i wouldn't be surprised if it's yours matt!

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:46 (twenty years ago)

is on a bunch of blogs that aren't very widely read, while the most popular blogs about music are either mp3 blogs which are written to be extremely accessable to readers, or sites that focus on news and gossip.

So which blogs aren't widely read and why not? And which are and why? And is that the same as blogs that are always cited in the mainstream media?

George Smith, Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:47 (twenty years ago)

if blogs are "influencing" the mainstream media than by defn they are communicating so that argt don't fly

mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:48 (twenty years ago)

Blount, it's much easier for me to think of music writers who AREN'T much better on their blogs than they are in print. Douglas Wolk and Sasha Frere-Jones most certainly save their best efforts for print publications. I think that Jess Harvell generally benefits from being edited.

The most popular music blogs according to sites like Technorati are Stereogum, Large-Hearted Boy, Ultragrrrl, Music For Robots, Fluxblog, and Said The Gramophone. You can count Whatevs if you want to, but that's more of a general gossip site.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

It doesn't need to take tips from people who often seem to be actively disdaining the idea of writing with communication in mind.

name names, or yer off my OTM list

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

Oh, and then there's band-specific stuff like U2log, who get at least three times more readers than I have.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

Oh shit, I forgot to mention Catchdubs. They are pretty big too.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

musicblogs haven't had anywhere near the impact on the music press that sportsblogs and ESPECIALLY politicalblogs have had on the sports and, er, hard press have they?

j blount (papa la bas), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:52 (twenty years ago)

bloggers being published =/ music blogs influencing the press

miccio (miccio), Wednesday, 9 March 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

Blogs are vertical, tho! Albeit in an ass-backwards fashion. Maura also OTM: re new-to-old chronological order sucking, esp. when a newer entry refs to an old entry you haven't read yet, & you have to make w/ the mouse scroller. & both M's are right w/ the need / call for "outside the box" thinking in presentation & approach, though I think WordPress' "pages" might go a long way towards letting some fresh air into bloggery / personal sitery for folks not too adept at the PHP / CSS / SQL. (My excuse for site stagnation: my design ideas are like old sweatsocks.)

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 16:09 (twenty years ago)

I've gone back and forth on whether or not I should start one. But I worry about it becoming a forum for me to complain about everything from my lunch to raging against global injustices against women. I kind of need that enforced filter (i.e. editor) or else I sound like a friggin' nutjob.

I actually got a pretty lucrative writing gig based on my work on nyr0kk, but then the new editor canned me 8 months later because my writing for them--a big glossy magazine--suddenly didn't work. "You write too much about the music." Ahhh, I see.

*slaps head*

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Thursday, 10 March 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

but doesn't the notion of design trumping content go back to the print oligarchy? wasn't it admitted upthread that the principle of democratizing what constitutes public opinion seen as a positive feature, and that the favors-for-favors networks seen as bankrupt? although the wordpress sites are admittedly pretty, i don't see that as progress in and of itself.

apart from music writing, the blogs that have made me happiest are those that are alienated expressions from workplaces and homes around the country/world - everyone has a room of their own, so to speak.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 10 March 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

(xpost Marcello I'm not Mike Love I'm the Honeys/American Spring dammit)re underutilized comments: Tom's been switiching Freaky Trigger comments over to Blogger, cos Haloscan comments disappear eventually. Some have told me they haven't left Blogger comments because they don't want to have to sign up for an account first, not realizing it's free, and/or fearing even more spam (although can use another handle, incl Anonymous), and/or just not wanting to have to sign up for one more thing. As a lazy ILMer (I usually put out with the factoids, but this time I'll whine)Please Tell Me About WordPress (not everythin, just how does it compare with blogs, reader/writer- user-friendly-wise)

don, Thursday, 10 March 2005 16:42 (twenty years ago)

blackmail, i don't understand your sentence about the 'favors-for-favors network as bankrupt' at all. can you explain what you mean?

maura (maura), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Don, WordPress is real easy to install & set-up, though you're going to need a webhost (I think). Webhosting's pretty inexpensive, though - you can get a domain name for $15 (which gives you rights to that domain for at least 2 years), & webhosting will probably run you about $9.95 / month.

There was a thread about WordPress on ILE (RFD: WordPress 1.5) where folks more in the know that I testify to its fantasticness, and if you visit the WordPress site (http://www.wordpress.org), you can check out their FAQ & other documentation. As for webhosting, I've used Dreamhost (http://www.dreamhost.com) since 1999, & they've been very good to me.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

maura - yeah (typing furtively from work leads to incongruent sentences to be sure) - it's just a statement about the undemocratic aspects of publishing, in that like other fields, it's the connections that matter most (which as has been pointed out upthread as the linking fetishism that is a necessary byproduct of craven attempts at boosting readership. but blogs demonstrate the willingness of many folks to publish what they care about, for better or worse. and i think spaces like blog rock on the voice are great, even if it specializes in voice freelancers.

blackmail.is.my.life (blackmail.is.my.life), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:51 (twenty years ago)

Blogger sheds no tears for Rather

By MARLON MANUEL
The Atlanta Journal-Constitution
Published on: 03/10/05

Amid the wafting smells of spicy meatballs and wine, in front of a Sony projection TV in Sandy Springs, Harry MacDougald clutched a Samuel Adams in his left hand Wednesday night as Dan Rather bid adieu after 24 years at the anchor of the "CBS Evening News."

But MacDougald did not cry in his beer.

Along with 50 guests, including many prominent Fulton County Republicans, the Atlanta attorney cheered the final night of Rather's anchor reign in a basement entertainment room usually used to watch Georgia Bulldog football games.

MacDougald is better known to Web aficionados as "Buckhead," the conservative blogger who first noticed that Rather used forged documents in a Sept. 8 "60 Minutes" story that questioned President Bush's Air National Guard service during the Vietnam War.

"For conservatives, he's been a black beast," MacDougald said Wednesday as a coat-and-tie crowd circulated around a GOP hero. "In conservative circles, Dan Rather has been viewed as an enemy."

Which is why on the night of Sept. 8 — at 11:59:43 — MacDougald clicked the submit button on the iMac in his bedroom and posted a message questioning the documents Rather used, ostensibly from the 1970s.

He noted that the proportional spacing and typeface of the documents could not have been produced by a '70s-era typewriter, but must have come from a modern-day word-processing program.

Shortly after his post to Free Republic, a hub of conservative viewpoints, other bloggers and news organizations also impugned the authenticity of the documents. Rather, though, defended his reporting — a stubbornness that helped lead to his exit from the anchor's chair. The network, and Rather, eventually apologized for the blunder.

"It's satisfying to have been part of a movement to defeat a smear based on a forged document," said MacDougald, 46, an Atlanta native and civil litigation attorney who once defended whistle-blowers in the administration of former Mayor Bill Campbell.

He also helped draft the petition urging the Arkansas Supreme Court to disbar President Bill Clinton after the Monica Lewinsky scandal.

Cary Ichter, whose law firm represents Gov. Sonny Perdue, offered his home as the Rather farewell spot at the urging of mutual friend Phil Kent, former president of the conservative-tilted Southeast Legal Foundation.

Ichter said he typically watches Georgia football games or boxing in his entertainment room. Wednesday, his guests watched a knockout of a different kind — the toppling of a news icon for nearly a quarter-century.

"It was a triumph over the left-leaning media agenda," Ichter said.

Despite the controversy, Rather has had a storied career. The anchor who considered himself a reporter first has been on the scene for big stories ranging from the Kennedy assassination to the Iraqi elections last month.

Ken Auletta, who interviewed Rather for an article in the New Yorker, said his work should stand the test of time, particularly as one of the most aggressive TV reporters covering Watergate.

But none of that mattered to the partygoers, including former Fulton County GOP Chairman Jack Winter and Fulton County Superior Court Judge Michael Johnson — who munched hors d'oeuvres on napkins and paper plates decorated like the American flag.

"Congratulations, fella," Winter told MacDougald as he entered the party.

MacDougald sees himself and other bloggers as part of band of citizen journalists who have upset the order of corporate media giants.

"The information oligarchy that TV had, that's gone," MacDougald said. "They'll never be as powerful as network anchors once were."

As Rather signed off, the crowed filed out — MacDougald with them.

Said MacDougald, "The wicked witch is dead."

— News services contributed to this article.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

Which is why on the night of Sept. 8 — at 11:59:43 — MacDougald clicked the submit button on the iMac in his bedroom and posted a message questioning the documents Rather used, ostensibly from the 1970s.

Macs have SUBMIT buttons? Nice! Fuck a Windows anykey!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

Also:

"The information oligarchy that TV had, that's gone," MacDougald said. "They'll never be as powerful as network anchors once were."

Yep.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

yeah, one thing that really depresses me about the rise of new nontrad media is generally how much more the right have made use of it than the left - drudge breaks lewinsky which nearly gets a president impeached, freepers get's rather canned and get 'proof! proof!' that big ol liberal media is real. there are all kinds of bloggers writing about anything and everything but if you hear the word 'blogger' in the news you can be pretty sure they mean 'conservative'. it'd be really sad to see republicans dominate the blogosphere as much as they do am radio.

xpost - and what's really sad is that the silver lining is 'nontrad media will probably never be nearly as relevant as it's proponents claim'.

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:06 (twenty years ago)

This can be surprisingly hard to do, since I've found that it's *very* difficult to get a handle on who your audience knows or doesn't know.

I would recommend not so much worrying about what factoids you want your audience to know and thinking more in general terms about who you are writing for. Grant Morrison always says that he writes his comics for "intelligent 14 year olds" and that certainly worked for me as a young teen reading his stuff. I think it's better to leave people curious and interested and hint at directions they can go in on their own time rather than bore them by being pedantic. I write my blog primarily with older teens in mind. High school seniors, college kids.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:14 (twenty years ago)

cos Haloscan comments disappear eventually.

Yeah, why is this? I'm happy to know it's not just me, but that kinda sucks. (I installed Haloscan before Blogger had its own comment feature.)

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

xpost - and what's really sad is that the silver lining is 'nontrad media will probably never be nearly as relevant as it's proponents claim'.

No doubt, Blount! I imagine bloggers will "win" in that traditional media outlets will co-opt aspects of bloggery as they see fit (which is happening), but the notion that blogs will be the ones doing the subsuming is ludicrous, esp. right now.

Never mind the whole infuriating "media bias blah blah we should be heard blah blah let's put a foot in the ass of anyone that's not ONE OF US blah blah yay right wing bias uber alles" crap not-so-implied in that article. Lefty blogdom seems to be stuck reacting to what righty blogdom does - instead of trying to dictate an agenda, or at least parry & counter, they're backpedalling to prevent the 3-on-1 fast break every time something happens. (Never mind that the few times a story from lefty blogville came up - OH NO OHIO BALLOT SCANDAL - it's up & died soon after it began).

It's like Princeton vs. UNLV - yay for the grassroots pick and roll, but meanwhile LJ, Hunt, and Anthony are runnin', gunnin', and droppin' a combined 75 on your fundamentally sound asses, and it's still the first half!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:17 (twenty years ago)

In case their reading, I just want to say what an honor it was to have my Fred Durst sex raps picked for 'Blog Rock.'

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:34 (twenty years ago)

Wow, that was the 57th time I've made a their/they're/there typo on ILX!

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

I think I might drop this whole critshit and focus solely on World Class Sex Rhymes on my blog.

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:35 (twenty years ago)

SHORRDAY!!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 10 March 2005 18:38 (twenty years ago)

Thanks for the WordPress info, David R.! CNN recently did a comparison of blog-broken brouhahas, and liberal blogs have done their share, like with Trent Lott's "If Only Strom had been Our Presy-dent" speech, on living video,quickly shared (alwyas wondered if theire wasn;t an inside Admin tip about that, since twas soon backgorunded that they wanted to get rid of lazy ol' Lott, anyway) and Abu Griab burns too (although the latter didn't even wait for liberals per-se). Eric Alterman's blog has been a great source and linkport for several years now, though not leading to headlines. His book, What Liberal Bias? also was one of the first to show how the present system of disinformation and intimidation diagrams (also, some of his linkmates have done good termite war, like showing how fraudulent are the quotes etc. in various best-selling rightie screeds)

don, Thursday, 10 March 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

haha miccio did you see the note durst wrote gawker?

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 10 March 2005 19:23 (twenty years ago)

no! what was it about?

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 10 March 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

http://www.gawker.com/news/culture/sex/fred-durst-nevermind-about-that-lawsuit-thingie-035403.php

j blount (papa la bas), Thursday, 10 March 2005 19:35 (twenty years ago)

fresh cut!

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 10 March 2005 20:21 (twenty years ago)

Don, if you can't install WP, I can help you out. It's deadeasy. I'm a complete buffoon and was able to do it in ten minutes. I love it! A lot easier than MT.

nathalie barefoot in the head (stevie nixed), Thursday, 10 March 2005 20:42 (twenty years ago)

Thanks, Nathalie! Right now,I don't have the time to sufficiently tweak my back (or front) pages, but I just might do that.

don, Thursday, 10 March 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

What does anyone think about the two bloggers who got fired for blogging? On their own time, too. One was a flight attendant; she posted pix of herself in uniform, which Delta found "suggestive." The other was a Google employee, who described goings-on in his company,information which he later said was already available to the public (google it, I guess).

don, Friday, 11 March 2005 04:55 (twenty years ago)

Thus far I dont, like, try to write? I donno. The blog is something i use sort of lazily, i guess that makes for bad blogging but i'm more interested in just throwing up whatever weird or beautiful shit i come across rather than practicing writing on it. Certainly I'm not spending a lot of time trying to write on the shrimp (as has been pointed out by others) but we're more concerned with a) having fun and b) drawing attention to shit that deserves attention.

djdee (djdee2005), Friday, 11 March 2005 05:47 (twenty years ago)

Although I can understand why some ppl would find that boring, i like doing it.

djdee (djdee2005), Friday, 11 March 2005 05:48 (twenty years ago)

"Write on the shrimp"?

don, Friday, 11 March 2005 07:16 (twenty years ago)

haha i think some ppl are tired of me linking to it all the time but...
http://somanyshrimp.com

djdee (djdee2005), Friday, 11 March 2005 07:47 (twenty years ago)

i guess their style isn't generic yawnsome frank kogan/sfj whoever enough for people to get into

I would hope that this statement would inspire a genre of its own. E.g., "I guess their style isn't generic yawnsome Louis Armstrong/FDR intergalactic sculpture enough for people to get into" or "I guess their style isn't generic yawnsome Ludwig Wittgenstein/Mark Fidrych proto-doo-wop enough for people to get into," etc.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 11 March 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

You forgot the very crucial "whoever" in your things, Frank.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 11 March 2005 19:01 (twenty years ago)

For what it's worth, chatrooms/message boards are far better than either blogs or mags.

Why Music Sucks = chatroom w/ dead trees and staples.

(P.S. I use the word "chatroom" as my catchall term for chatrooms/newsgroups/forums/message boards, since "chatroom" is a far sexier term. In my book I refer to "I Love Music" as a chatroom. I can't imagine wanting to call anything a "message board," except perhaps the employee bathroom at the Strand bookstore.)

David, I was substituting "proto-doo-wop" and "intergalactic sculpture" for "whoever/whatever," but perhaps we could add "whoever/whatever" afterwards.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 11 March 2005 19:06 (twenty years ago)

E.g., "I guess their style isn't generic yawnsome Ludwig Wittgenstein/Mark Fidrych proto-doo-wop whoever/whatever enough for people to get into."

And Shakira fans could add a "wherever" as well, and say that their breasts are too small and humble for people to get into.

Frank Kogan (Frank Kogan), Friday, 11 March 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

Somewhere in this thing, defendant later admitted he had never actually read any Frank Kogan. This Shakira fan's breasts are indeed too small humble for people to get into, but the Venusians like 'em, anand anyway it's Shakira's rotatation of worldclass I-know-we-can-can I'm inspired by, esp. big ol' butt-punctuation of her music-as-video-soundtrack. I can't see WMS as chat room. For a while, issues came out frequently enough that a pre-blog bloglike, contemperanious frythm could sustain itself: here's some music I've heard, how it fits into the context of my life, at least at the moment (the music coud be the key to a whole lot of "other" stuff, although, to near-paraphrase David Mamet on money, "music isn't just music.")And this could loop with feedback, responses, either explicit or indirect (reading what somebody else had written might send me off on a tangent that probably looked totally unrelated). And/or I might read my own stuff, in the cold light of print, and respond to that, but not by changing my mind about previous subjest, but taking a differnt approach to the next victim. Eventually, publication slowed down to the point that, say, burning refutations and sub-literary feuds (or literary sub-feuds) arrived as withered vets of the spaceways. Frank even cracked a joke to this effect, for the benefit of those who still seemed to expect rapidfire response. So, def can't see as chat rooms! But, if you accepted the time gap, it could be very advantageous, as far as coming up with a condsidered reposne, rather than hitting SUBMIT in the current hairtrigger manner. And, maybe most un-bloglike of all, Frank eventually announced he wanted to be a real editor, and some of us took him up on it.

don, Friday, 11 March 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

ten months pass...
EL VIEJO BENO
Es su Nombre, nacio en la Ciudad de Bonao, Provincia de Monsenol Nouel, Republica Dominicana.

Su inclinación por la música se confirma desde temprana edad al estar en medio de los ensayos de la orquesta de su Padre.

Cuando tenia 12 anos de edad toco por primera vez en una orquesta infantil que habian formado en la Ciudad de Sabana de la Mar.

Es un Artista de corazon, escribe y canta solo las cosas vividas sean buenas o malas convirtiendolas con mucha genialidad en algo jocoso y muy picaro, para asi ayudar a la juventud a disfrutar el dia como si fuera el ultimo que viviria.

las cosas serias de las que escribe lo hace de manera muy divertida pero muy profesional, haciendo asi que la gente se olvide de las penas y problemas politicos, economicos y sociales, que nos impiden cada dia ser nosotros mismo y disfrutar la vida como debe ser.

El Viejo Beno dice que “un dia sin reir es un dia perdido”, y ese es el motivo de sus canciones, que la gente no pierda los dias que puedan disfrutar aunque este la barrera de las situaciones diarias, por que la vida es corta y solo el sufrir la hace mas larga.

Tiene escritas mas de cincuenta y cinco canciones de Reggaeton, y lo que me sorprendio mucho fue escuchar que ninguna se parece, cada una es una historia real, y lo mas impresionante es que no repite ninguna de las oraciones de sus estrofas en otras canciones.

Sus primeras tres producciones saldran, si todo le sigue saliendo como hasta ahora, en marzo de este ano y tiene planeado para fin de ano su primer album, “VACILON Y FRONTEO” con canciones como :

1 - Intro (aqui el hombre realmente se las trae)
2 - La Pecadera (Fiestera)

3 - Me gu´tan To´a (a las mujeres)

4 - El Bonaense (a su pueblo)

5 - Senda de gozo (a las mujeres)

6 - Vacilon y fronteo (a las mujeres)

7 - Soy un Tolete (de forma ironica)

8 - Realidad Negra (contra el Racismo)

9 - Vacilon en Perreo (fiestera)

10 - La home - runera (a la Rubia Poderosa)

11 - Futuro de un Chota (una jocosa e ingeniosa prediccion para el que chotea)

12 - El Chota Sangre Azul (historia real de aguien que es hijo y nieto de chota y El Viejo Beno le aconseja por medio a esta cancion)

13 - Sueno Cumplido (Reggaeton fiestero de agradecimiento con un menu de letras muy bueno y mucho sentimiento)

14 - Sin Malicia (protesta contra los que prohiben las canciones por el doble sentido)

15 – El Funio (jodio) Beep (en esta cancion El Viejo Beno protesta por que las canciones tienen que ser danadas por un maldito pip, que dana las letras y las rimas de las canciones, realizando de forma ironica el pip de la censura el mismo con la boca)
Yo tenia que escribir de esto por que como dije “El Viejo se las trae”

Y espero que siga hacia delante sin ningun tipo de tropiezos esperando que hayan mas que lo hagan como el y que pueda seguir contando con el apoyo de mas personas que quieran disfrutar mas de la vida y hacer menos dano.

Bueno y para finalizar aqui les dejo las letras de la cancion “El Funio Beep” y la direccion para que la bajen y espero que les guste, hasta mas lueguito yo les seguire informando.......
.....por que estoy haciendo esto por que aparte de que tiene talento... es un buen AMIGO

EL FUNIO (jodio) BEEP

Ahora las canciones vienen con tecnologia
Tan con un funio beep que hasta usted sorprenderian
Hay unas como esta que hasta causan decepcion
Por que suena mas el beep que las letras ´e la cancion

Mira bien el flow que tiene esa morena
Esa a mi me desbarata es una buena hembra
´Ta entera, surtia como paletera
Este ripio ´e peso guardaria en su cartera

La noche entera ........aunque me muera
Le daria beep hasta por las orejas
Y despues de beep rociarla como maguera
Por que ella bien disfruta beep a mi manera

Leavinsky posicion eso es una chuleria
Por que como ella beep lo hace con vacaneria
A esa con todo y ropa yo no me la comeria
Por que yo durante un mes solo trapos evacuaria

No haria como papo si su mujer ta enfogonada
Si ella no quiere beep el se entra a punaladas
Hasta su mujer se niega cuando uno esta de mala
Mucho beep sin un centavo pone flaco y eso sala

Como hombre chibirico tiene la bragueta abierta
Por que ahora quiere beep la noche entera
Pero no tiene un centavo ni pa´ ver telenovela
Y su mujer pa beep no esta dispuesta

CORO
Ahora las canciones vienen con tecnologia
Tan con un funio beep que hasta usted sorprenderian
Hay unas como esta que hasta causan decepcion
Por que suena mas el beep que las letras ´e la cancion

No digas de senoritas de que son inseguritas
Solo por que quieres beep y por ti no estan loquitas
Como horita.....que me rompieron la camisa
Por que muchas quieren beep a lo claro no escondidas

Pa frontear con lo que tienen demostrar lo que ellas pueden
Y te beep y tambien te beep delante de la gente
Me frontean uhmm con una miradita
Y no es mentiras ups es que se sienten seducidas

Por que me entrego por entero cuando yo beep
Pa ella dejo yo de ser viejo
Y es que a ella le gusto como yo beep
Uhm pa ella yo soy solamente el Beno

CORO
Ahora las canciones vienen con tecnologia
Tan con un funio beep que hasta usted sorprenderian
Hay unas como esta que hasta causan decepcion
Por que suena mas el beep que las letras ´e la cancion

A las Dominicanas, les gusta beep
Alla en Puerto rico, les gusta beep
En esos Nueva Yores, les gusta beep
A las Venesolanas, les gusta beep
A las Colombianas, les gusta beep
Alla en Miami, les gusta beep
En Europa entera, les gusta beep
Y a el mundo entero, les guta beep

Beep en la manana, beep al medio dia
y si Dios no mete su mano Beep tres vece al dia

Con El Viejo Beno.... a pitar Hasta que Colon Baje el Deo!!
Sigue Ahi!!

Y aqui la pueden bajar, GRATIS!!

http://rapidshare.de/files/10596842/4-funio_beep-EL_VIEJO_BENO.mp3.html
y

http://www.flurl.com/uploaded/El_Jodio_Beep__de_El_Viejo_Beno_46465.html


DISFRUTENLA!!!!!

luis hernandez, Thursday, 26 January 2006 19:32 (nineteen years ago)

one year passes...

http://idolator.com/tunes/white-noise/overheated-world-of-music-blogging-results-in-a-few-cases-of-exhaustion-308340.php

Idolator on the state of blogs

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:11 (seventeen years ago)

Not to mention this from rockcritics.com last week:

http://rockcritics.com/2007/10/03/rockcritics-music-blogger-symposium/

Ned Raggett, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:19 (seventeen years ago)

x-post

Idolator references an October 9 pretty goes with pretty blog piece referencing the October 3rd rockcritics.com blogging symposium discussion with Maura Johnston (the editor of Idolator and blogs regularly at maura dot com);
* Rich Juzwiak (He currently writes fourfour and co-writes the VH1 Blog); David Moore is a teenpop correspondent for Stylus magazine and lapsed Pitchfork contributor. [See Dave Moore’s blog: Cure for Bedbugs];
* Simon Reynolds; Carl Wilson (writer and editor at The Globe and Mail in Toronto, and blogger)

http://rockcritics.com/2007/10/03/rockcritics-music-blogger-symposium/

http://prettygoeswithpretty.typepad.com/pgwp/

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:21 (seventeen years ago)

Guys, blogs, seriously.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:22 (seventeen years ago)

Good article. This passage is especially true:

And I think the current state of the RSS feed outlined by Pretty Goes With Pretty--the lack of critical filters, the rise of the "promo MP3" and having to respond to that and only that if one is going to craft a post about a band, the symbiotic relationship between PR companies' aims and music bloggers' content--has also resulted in burnout on my end, with there being so much chatter and noise that I've gone back to only really trusting recommendations from friends and a few hand-picked sources in order to find out about new music.

It's the same as people saying the Internet would usher in an era of "real, unfiltered" information getting to the public. It's true -- as far as it goes -- but there's now so much volume online, such a loud echo chamber, such duplication and posturing, that after a while all that information becomes background noise. That leads me back to identifying a handful of sources who I trust, and relying primarily on them (which isn't a bad thing, by any means).

Daniel, Esq., Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:23 (seventeen years ago)

The Oxford article linked in the Idolator piece is good too.

Whiney G. Weingarten, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:25 (seventeen years ago)

Check out this Maura quote-

But today, with the rise of the MP3 blog and the idea that a person doesn’t need to write about a record in order to communicate what it sounds like, the space hasn’t become just for critics–while there are some great writers running blogs that have MP3s and music samples on them, there’s also been a rise in blogs that are much more enthusiasm-driven and interested in sharing music directly, without any verbal clutter. There’s a definite divide between the two generations of music bloggers, with a few people (Matthew Perpetua of Fluxblog, Sean at Said The Gramophone) straddling it. (I think I’m one of about four or five people who still is on I Love Music–although I never have time to post anymore

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:30 (seventeen years ago)

http://freakytrigger.co.uk/ft/2007/10/i-bolted-through-a-closing-door/#comment-323406

Check out the comments on the golden age of blogging (4 years ago)

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:36 (seventeen years ago)

Does Rolling Stone Magazine's circulation still dwarf most of these blogs put together?

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:39 (seventeen years ago)

I'm liking Wayneandwax.com and Dj Rupture's mudd up blog these days

curmudgeon, Thursday, 11 October 2007 05:44 (seventeen years ago)

the best music writing anywhere is done on my blog http://www.acuterecords.com/blog

dan selzer, Thursday, 11 October 2007 06:27 (seventeen years ago)

The best music writing tries to be as objective as possible, which means blogs are hardly typical of good music writing at all. But neither is very subjective music mags such as NME, snobbish elite-mags such as The Wire or extremely genre-spesific mags such as Mixmag, Kerrang or The Source. The mest music writing is done by more objective mags such as Q and Mojo. (and to some exctent Uncut, although their exaggeration of Americana's importance makes them a little too much on the subjective side)

Geir Hongro, Thursday, 11 October 2007 09:05 (seventeen years ago)

http://images-jp.amazon.com/images/P/B00005QD7O.01.LZZZZZZZ.jpg

"You've always been there for us, Q and Mojo (and to some extent Uncut)"

DJ Mencap, Thursday, 11 October 2007 09:25 (seventeen years ago)

“all in one place” can create a crackle which pushes somewhere new — niche-located allows response to be elective and selective, when (sometimes) it didn’t ought to be, and i think the push somewhere new is actually reduced (what we’ve somewhat seen is the establishment of multiple zones-in-exile pushing old lines, letting themeslves be unbothered by dissent because it’s easily screened out

the problem is that there’s no way to allow space for “serious” dissent (obv inc jokes) without also enabling “timewaster” dissent (obv inc utterly po-faced counter-args)

mark s very otm.

r|t|c, Thursday, 11 October 2007 10:59 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.