is "experimental music" a ghetto?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
been thinking about this a lot lately, mostly because the majority of 'experimental' music i listen to is hardly experimental in the actual sense of the word. sometimes i feel like it has become a lazy shorthand to mean "music with sounds that are difficult to square with", whereas i think the more accurate reading would be "music that is made by processes that are more difficult to contain/predict". do you agree? if so, what is lost in this discrepancy? how do you feel about this phrase? is it the next "idm"?

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 13 March 2005 18:42 (twenty years ago)

is it the next "idm"

expanding on this, i think 'idm' as a signifier used to have an academic/futurist currency that made it a favorable genre for brainy mainstream co-option, with radiohead being the most obvious perps. now that idm has lost its lustre, will 'experimental' step in to become the next onesheet spice of choice?

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 13 March 2005 18:48 (twenty years ago)

More like a black hole. Anything will fit into it, but the minute you're tagged with a "takes a few listens to appreciate" or "not for all audiences," you vanish into it, never to be heard from again (except by Wire readers).

Or is this a new, particular use of "experimental" that has some kind of recent connotations?

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 13 March 2005 18:50 (twenty years ago)

i guess i'm just wondering if people still think the word has actual meaning. because if it doesn't, it's only a matter of time before it gets thrown into any old stew, no?

mark p (Mark P), Sunday, 13 March 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)

"experimental" as a term has always pretty much been bullshit...it's not fucking science....it's always pretty much been shorthand for "doing wierd shit" right? unless someone was doing some kind of research on how certain frequencies or tonalities affect the human brain or looking for the elusive deep-bass "brown" note that will finally make the whole audience shit their pants....or maybe like those guys that invent new types of music intruments or something.

will 'experimental' step in to become the next onesheet spice of choice?"

yes, and it probably already has become a meaningless term, and maybe always was.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Sunday, 13 March 2005 18:57 (twenty years ago)

'experimental' can always depend on a core audience in a way that most genres can't.

Al (sitcom), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:18 (twenty years ago)

also it's a pretty relative term. if a trad band does anything slightly different, then suddenly the new Wilco album or whatever is 'experimental'.

Al (sitcom), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:19 (twenty years ago)

how is "experimental music" a new term? as in the "is it the new idm" sentence. "experimental HORSE music", now that's new.

scott seward (scott seward), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

"experimental" is also a handy catchall term for improv music that isn't jazz (and isn't necessarily "noise" either).

Al (sitcom), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:25 (twenty years ago)

there was a good thread about this a while ago that josh started...

floaty = avant-garde

geeta (geeta), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:28 (twenty years ago)

Historically, things like serialism and musique concrete could certainly have been thought of as "experiments." I guess I'd say that if someone's doing an experiment, then it's experimental. If their just doing old experiments still, then it's new music or whatever.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

*they're*

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 13 March 2005 19:36 (twenty years ago)

I guess I think of "experimental" as a word to describe music that more or less does away with the widely recognized forms of song or composition. The form or structure is where the experiment happens, maybe.

Mark (MarkR), Sunday, 13 March 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

"experimental music" is about as descriptive (not to mention proscriptive) a term as "dance music"; unfortunately it's as well-entrenched, and almost certainly will be with us for a while.

philip sherburne (philip sherburne), Sunday, 13 March 2005 20:19 (twenty years ago)

Wasn't it Men's Recovery Project who had a song "Experimental Music Is Consumer Fraud"?

Ian John50n (orion), Sunday, 13 March 2005 20:39 (twenty years ago)

i agree that the word "experimental" has more a generic than a substantive meaning nowadays in a musical context. which is too bad. it allows for some lazy judgment calls and a hackneyed notion of what constitutes adventurousness.

by all rights "experimental" should qualify not the sounds themselves but the process of making them. by which understanding "experimental music" has no monopoly on experiment.

i have this problem with "experimental film" too, and it engenders some of the same troublesome notions among its fans.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Sunday, 13 March 2005 20:57 (twenty years ago)

(it probably doesn't help that neither "experimental music" nor "experimental film" is exactly my cup of tea.)

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Sunday, 13 March 2005 20:59 (twenty years ago)

I think that anything that struggles to find an audience and a place in the market is a ghetto so avant-garde practice would fit but at the same time many musics will be rendered uneccessary by newer developments within causing a split between the ppl who follow it and those who don't with the latter trying to find their place: not avant yet ghettoized, or indiefied, if you like.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Sunday, 13 March 2005 21:29 (twenty years ago)

BTW, about one-sheets - I don't know how many people would put "experimental" on a one-sheet (but hit me with examples). I'd expect to hear descriptions like "far-out" or "mindblowing" or "gonzo" or something that makes it sound exciting - I'm not sure "experimental" has a good connotation!

I'm going to go over to www.tzadik.com, they're pretty aggressive about selling their stuff, I wonder what kind of words they use ...

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 13 March 2005 22:12 (twenty years ago)

Okay, here are some blurbs from Tzadik's new/upcoming list. Wherever they could have possibly used "experimental," I bolded the word that they chose instead.

Masada: Sanhedrin [#7346-2]

Twenty-nine sterling studio performances never available before from what many consider to be one of the most important instrumental ensembles of the past quarter century. Over two and a half hours of rare alternates, many even more exciting than the original releases, were handpicked by Zorn from the legendary sessions of 1994-1997 and are accompanied by a lush booklet filled with photos, scores, written tributes and remembrances. This pioneering band, that spearheaded Radical Jewish Culture and helped bring Jewish music into the 21st Century, continues to inspire Jews and music lovers the world over with an original musical language of honesty, imagination and originality drawing on many pasts and looks toward a myriad of futures. This is where it all began.

John Zorn: Filmworks XVI [#7347]

Zorn’s latest soundtrack is scored for percussion and electronics, and features two masterful musicians who have been working with him consistently since 1981: Cyro Baptista and Ikue Mori. The subject of the film is quite remarkable—men who work life-threatening jobs—and as the settings jump from Java to China, Nigeria to the Ukraine, so does the music. Steaming sulphur mines, the bloodbaths of a brutal slaughterhouse…these are just a few of the scenes that are evoked in this unique score that blends dynamic rhythms with ambient soundscapes.

Composer Series
Jacques Coursil: Minimal Brass [#8016]

The first recording since 1969 from one of the legends of the New York experimental music scene who has collaborated with Anthony Braxton, Sunny Murray, Perry Robinson, Albert Ayler and many others. After two astounding albums incorporating serial techniques into the angry energy of free jazz, Jacques Coursil dropped out of the music scene and returned to his native Martinique to teach linguistic theory…but he never stopped playing and never lost his connection to the music. Minimal Brass is a new beginning for this remarkable maverick [MAVERICK - ALWAYS A FAVORITE], a fabulous suite incorporating sound, noise and texture into a swirling masterpiece of overdubbed trumpets. Circular breathing, French philosophy and soulful lyricism from one of modern [MODERN'S GOOD TOO] music’s lost masters.

Time of Orchids: Sarcast While [#8013]

Time of Orchids blurs the line between metal, classical and industrial with stunning technical prowess and this new CD is their most ambitious work to date—a powerful suite exploring complex harmonies and chaotic textures with remarkable intensity and ghostlike beauty. Featuring the remarkable Julee Cruise from Twin Peaks on guest vocals, Sarcast While is an avant-rock masterpiece. Haunting synths, manic shrieks and jagged guitar/bass/drums interplay from a young band pioneering a complex and vibrant new rock sound.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Sunday, 13 March 2005 22:17 (twenty years ago)

Wait, a lot of those things you highlighted are verbs and nouns, while experimental is an adjective. And I don't think they necessarily were implying "experimental" in a lot of those cases.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Sunday, 13 March 2005 22:26 (twenty years ago)

I don't mean you could word-for-word replace them, I'm just pointing out that "maverick" is a better sell than "experimental artist." "Important" doesn't exactly mean "experimental," but it's a good way of saying, "worth the effort"; I picked "blurs the line" because genre-crossing is a staple of experimentation. When I prepare my paper for the Journal of Underground Marketing, I'll fix the errors and clarify the methodology.

Chris Dahlen (Chris Dahlen), Monday, 14 March 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)

There are four definitionshere. While definition 1 seems to be one most people on the thread are using, and is used in the mainstream, I was under the impression that definition 3 ("The performance of music of which the outcome cannot be foreseen") was the most common one used in academic music/compositional writing and thought. It refers to a specific American tradition (Cage, Brown, Cardew, et al) that is quite distinct from serialism and other avant-garde traditions. Varese, for example, distanced himself from the term, saying that all his experiments were completed before he finished a composition. Michael Nyman's book Experimental Music is a classic text on the tradition and quite readable.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Monday, 14 March 2005 00:29 (twenty years ago)

Varese, for example, distanced himself from the term, saying that all his experiments were completed before he finished a composition

this statement is so far outside the contemporary ilm-esque discourse on music that it made me laugh in total awe.

Amateur(ist) (Amateur(ist)), Monday, 14 March 2005 02:15 (twenty years ago)

wtf does "ghetto" mean in this context anyway? like it's treated by everyone else with condescension? placed on a backburner somehow? reiterating its own existence? stuck in the projects? i think your use of the word "ghetto" here is completely ridiculous--unless you meant something else entirely that i'm not getting. i mean, it's not like society at large is wronging "experimental music" in any way--if anything, fans of experimental music see things the other way around (i.e. your straw-man wire reader).

on the other hand, real-life fans of experimental music i've encountered have had some of the most open-minded, genre-hopping tastes of anyone i know, usually guided by very music-specific characteristics (unique form, texture, etc., as opposed to "indie band i hate it" or "jock music i hate it"). this may be because it takes a big leap of faith (in my experience at least) to jump into something "experimental" and figure out you enjoy it on a gut level, like learning a new language or something. from here, learning other languages is easier--and you can think much more clearly about music in general + why you like it + why you don't.

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Monday, 14 March 2005 02:55 (twenty years ago)

of course, you can do that with any other type of music too. it's just that "experimental" music is the most appealing if you grew up an indie fan/elitist.

me: sonic youth -> derek bailey, AMM -> bob marley, missy, britney

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Monday, 14 March 2005 03:00 (twenty years ago)

the great thing about taking a full leap into experimental from indie is that you're eliminating the whole narcissism of small differences thing that divides indie from the mainstream (i mean, how different are they anyway?) = you're much more able to make big leaps in how you listen to music, less able to get on an identity-based high horse.

fauxhemian (fauxhemian), Monday, 14 March 2005 03:04 (twenty years ago)

It can be meaningfully used in both loose and strict senses I reckon- the loose sense is a comparative claim- record X is experimental folk because it's less structured / harmonically "correct" / rhythmically "straight" than presumed standard folk record Y - the strict sense is "a set of conditions / situations were put in place that generated a sonic output which could not be predicted, and the recording/performance is an unedited presentation of those results"- there are plenty of pieces that satisfy this strict definition, but not nearly so many as in the loose sense. But I think people in conversation grasp both options. It is a much abused term, but only in that people disagree about how much experimental "cred" to extend to given artist X or Y

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Monday, 14 March 2005 05:01 (twenty years ago)

while i'm all for (and enjoy tremendously) autistic / self immersive / non compromising music, these days i tend to have a greater rspect for music that goes out of it's way to GIVE rather than DEMAND (i am an artist and you should listen or else you are lazy and unenlightened).
having said that, whether the production niceties of a basement jaxx / radiohead album are appropriations or benign offerings depends on whether you can take either of them orthe notion of "experimental music" seriously. i guess what i'm trying to say is: is experimental music (and you and i know that it's only a label and it so very rarely is experimental) more experimental out of context ie when it engages with the mainstream? surely that's more of an acheivement than rumbling & screeching in a basement somewhere (even tho i'll happily pay to get in to see that, or feel some sense of enormous pride having taped 30 mins of aleatoric derived noise from machines)

bob snoom, Monday, 14 March 2005 11:09 (twenty years ago)

'even tho i'll happily pay to get in to see that'

and its only a fiver :-)

I know what you mean abt the first part of yr post Bob but I think the idea that an artist demands more is surely to do with the increased closeness between him/her and the audience. also you're right the general impression I get (from reading stuff here also) is the more engaged to the mainstream needn't exclude the notion that experimentation could occur => certain sounds in new contexts can provoke shifts just as much as new processes manufactured by an avant-garde. But I also love many non-song forms too (whether new or not).

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Monday, 14 March 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)

three years pass...

John Peel not adequately replaced
Mixing It axed from Radio 3
and now BBC has axed the Experimental Music section of it's website.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/music/experimental/

The 'Experimental' genre is no longer being updated by the BBC Music team. You might find what you're looking for in either Dance & Electronica, Rock & Indie or Jazz & Blues.

djmartian, Monday, 21 July 2008 19:40 (seventeen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.