TS: Unknown Pleasures vs. Closer

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
A run through the archives didn't dig anything up...

So then, Joy Division managed to secure their place in music history despite only releasing two albums. Both are pretty undeniably classic. But which do you prefer?

stephen morris (stephen morris), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:44 (twenty years ago)

unknown pleasures

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

Closer

biznotic, Monday, 14 March 2005 19:48 (twenty years ago)

I prefer Unknown Pleasures but Closer is probably a greater acheivement and the better album.

La Monte (La Monte), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:49 (twenty years ago)

Closer

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:55 (twenty years ago)

I heard Closer first, so it's more firmly entrenched in my psyche, but Unknown Pleasures is indeed a crucial record. Still, I'm going with Closer.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:56 (twenty years ago)

closer

kyle (akmonday), Monday, 14 March 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

I can listen to "Unknown Pleasures" more often than I can to "Closer": it's more immediate, the darkness less oppressive.

Noways I play the live bootleg "Les Bains Douches," which has got some fierce renditions of UP songs, when I need my fix.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

closer

Aerodynamic (Aerodynamic), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

Closer

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

Substance. I can't get into the albums for some reason.

I got the job because I was so mean, while somehow appearing so kind. (AaronHz), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

Unknown Pleasures.

Sean Carruthers (SeanC), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:12 (twenty years ago)

Substance for me, but I lurve Unknown Pleasures because Closer is unbelievably dark and hard to take most of the time.

deej., Monday, 14 March 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

Substance.

As for the studio albums, UP has the better sound and production and Closer has the better songs. I can never decide between the two.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:18 (twenty years ago)

Actually we had this debate going recently on another Joy Division thread, but as it started out a "hate on JD" type thread, it's not your fault for missing it, Stephen.

As I said there, Closer is the better one, but I'm far more likely to play Unknown Pleasures these days.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:47 (twenty years ago)

i go w/ "unknown pleasures," just for "disorder," "new dawn fades" (the most BLATANT black sabbath riff of their careers), and "she's lost control."

Eisbär (llamasfur), Monday, 14 March 2005 20:53 (twenty years ago)

TS: "She's Lost Control" (on Substance) and "She's Lost Control" (on Unknown Pleasures)

Throw in the Grace Jones cover for good measure.

deej., Monday, 14 March 2005 21:17 (twenty years ago)

closer. definatly. even though unknown pleasures has disorder. closer is overal more solid.

j-dizzle, Monday, 14 March 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

it's not even close to a contest. the SLC on Substance makes the one on UP sound like some half-assed demo in comparison to the 12" version, which is probably my favorite JD song.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Monday, 14 March 2005 21:20 (twenty years ago)

Wow, I have to listen to them both again right now, but offhand I'd say Unknown Pleasures just for "Shadowplay" and by far the coolest cover art evar.

mnra, Monday, 14 March 2005 21:21 (twenty years ago)

been listening to the heart & soul comp this weekend - and the live disc is excellent. the booklet quotes the band as saying that the records didnt sound like they wanted, but what did they know? they were just kids etc
apart from atmosphere which is just superb.. hannetts production doesnt quite suit the band. id love to hear a remastered/unproduced unknown pleasures.

bedoah, Monday, 14 March 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

I think Unknown Pleasures is more consistent, although I used to like Closer more.


TS: "She's Lost Control" (on Substance) and "She's Lost Control" (on Unknown Pleasures)
"She's Lost Control" on Something Else!

Quit glaring at Ian Riese-Moraine! He's mentally fraught! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:18 (twenty years ago)

substance >> unknown pleasures > closer >>>>> still

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

Am being a gargantuan gargler of jizz to point out that SUBSTANCE -- as nice as it is -- IS A FUCKIN' COMPILATION, AND THEREFORE NOT ADMISSABLE, YOU YOWLING GAGGLE OF GRANDMOTHERS!

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:56 (twenty years ago)

Whichever album is playing at the time.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:58 (twenty years ago)

Am being a gargantuan gargler of jizz to point out that SUBSTANCE -- as nice as it is -- IS A FUCKIN' COMPILATION, AND THEREFORE NOT ADMISSABLE, YOU YOWLING GAGGLE OF GRANDMOTHERS!

no tracks on it appear on any of their albums, though, so I think it's equally admissable.

The Good Dr. Bill (The Good Dr. Bill), Monday, 14 March 2005 23:59 (twenty years ago)

*AHEM* There's a lil' number titled "She's Lost Control" on both Substance AND Unknown pleasures!

For songs, Closer. For sound, Unknown Pleasures.

For singles, Substance.

With your powers combined, I AM CAPTAIN PLANET!

latebloomer: damn cheapskate satanists (latebloomer), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:01 (twenty years ago)

TS: "She's Lost Control" (on Substance) and "She's Lost Control" (on Unknown Pleasures)
Throw in the Grace Jones cover for good measure.

Grace Jones, by like, four miles at least.

Nothing against the originals either, like.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:09 (twenty years ago)

Latebloomer, I don't understand.

Michael Philip Philip Philip Philip Annoyman v1.0 (Ferg), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)

I need to try the albums again. I have had Substance for years and love it, but I think I didn't give the albums proper enough of a chance. (That was partly down to the box set, which I bought them as part of, falling apart within half an hour of buying it - was not happy!)

'haitch' (haitch), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:10 (twenty years ago)

"closer" is probably my favourite album of all time, but i find it so difficult and consuming to listen to that it's seldom played. seriously: things have gone badly wrong if i'm moved to play it.

i love "unknown pleasures" dearly. but it's not "closer". nothing is.

grimly fiendish (grimlord), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)

Unknown Pleasures.

I still don't get Closer. I need to listen to it again.

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 01:17 (twenty years ago)

Side 2 of Closer is the single most harrowing side of music i've ever heard.Of course that comment is tainted by the fact that i first heard the album about a month or two after his death.By this point i had already picked up Transmission,Atmosphere & Love Will Tear Us Apart & was pretty much expecting the greatest album ever.The production on Closer is brittle & kind of ghostly.I always thought the fuller sound achieved on the singles was a better representation of them,
I bought Unknown Pleasures knowing nothing of the band based on the fact i liked the cover & a review in Sounds.I really dug it but in a year when i bought Wires "154",PIL's "Metal Box.& Magazines first album this was just 1 more really good album. I didn't realize how special Joy Dision was until the release of Atmosphere.
Plus i always wished the guitars on Unknown Pleasures were louder..Therefore i choose Closer.And i still think Love will Tear Us Apart is their weakest single.Personally i prefer Ceremony.But i guess thats for another thread.

evan chronister (evan chronister), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 02:27 (twenty years ago)

Unknown Pleasures is more patchy, but I'm much more likely to play it.

Deluxe (Damian), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 03:39 (twenty years ago)

I love Still - especially "Exercise One," "Ice Age," "The Kill," "Something Must Break," "Walked In Line" and the live show. (I know I am alone on this last point.) The fact that it was the second LP I heard (after Substance had already blown my teenage mind) probably accounts for this. I've never understood why it is so maligned.

As for Unknown Pleasures & Closer, I would have to go with UP and not because I like the songs on Closer any less, but because I like the production more on UP. I was introduced to most of the Closer material via the live versions on Still or the versions on The Peel Sessions and the Closer versions just pale in comparison.

Re: "She's Lost Control" - it's the 12" mix for me.

Kent Burt (lingereffect), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 05:44 (twenty years ago)

I'm going to get some flack for this (but no more than when I said I didn't think JD was much good a few months back)...

but Unknown Pleasures by a longshot. Closer often feels so sluggish to me, like it's difficult to get through for reasons other than it's more "dark" and "oppresive" qualities. Anyone feel this way?

dronez are not ours to eat, dronez are not ours to wear (smile), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 06:47 (twenty years ago)

clearly unknown pleasures. it is still punk whereas closer is the beginning of goth.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:08 (twenty years ago)

Closer is colder, far more devastating. I think that explains why so many people here (including me) play it far less. It's like a beautiful humongous piece of ice sculpture. Keep wheeling it out and somone's liable to get hurt. Or it might melt, which would be worse. But no, I don't hear sluggish at all.

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:14 (twenty years ago)

See, I don't hear goth. Goth is dark (or often, a cartoon kind of dark), which is not implied as either praise or damnation, but JD never sounded like goth to me. Even "New Dawn Fades" which could be seen as a bridge between Sabbath and goth (and Sisters of Mercy must surely have been thinking of it when they wrote "Some Kind of Stranger") is still too urgent and somehow real (which is an inadequate word, but do you think I'm gonna be stupid enough to use "authentic" on ILM!?).

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:18 (twenty years ago)

Why does everything have to be a fucking COMPETITION in this place?

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:24 (twenty years ago)

Closer.

Not Goth or anything to do with Goth, as David A explains brilliantly above. Closer beats UP narrowly because they really pushed themselves to come up with something different and new. The synths were more integral to the sound too. Only New Dawn Fades on UP approaches the wintry, ruined beauty of Isolation, Decades, Heart and Soul and Isolation. By then Curtis knew it was all up, and while it's almost too much to take, like all great albums from the edge, it's also strangely uplifting too. A masterpiece.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:28 (twenty years ago)

x-post
closer is more oppressive than u.p., more claustrophobic. i am not sure if i'd associate these qualities more with dark or more with cold. i think what makes me think of goth is ian curtis voice. it definitely has a creepy side to it, a graveyard timbre. in the beginning of warsaw he didn't sing like that. he shouted more. i actually started a thread about early jd a while ago here.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 08:30 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, in one sense, Marcello's right; this is a classic false dichotomy. They're both incredible albums.

A couple things though: "wintry, ruined beauty" is a perfect description of Closer (new thread: describe your favourite record in three words!)

And Curtis's voice. I know that he had that tremulous baritone thing happening that became a goth staple (Pete Murphy, Andrew Eldritch) and even antecedent ( Jim Morrison), but he was also a shouter and a crooner, which was a unique combination then and has rarely been impersonated since (this last clause is open to massive refutation). It's true he crooned less when they were called Warsaw. I wonder if I hear cold as opposed to dark simply because of the album covers (one white, one black), and even the titles. The word "closer", when pronounced as if referring to something ending, sounds frosty, whereas pleasures (even the unknown kind!) are surely warm, even if they're dark. But I should shut up now. This is starting to sound a bit obsessive.

David A. (Davant), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:00 (twenty years ago)

Hannett varispeeded his voice up and down quite a bit. Mainly up, I think - e.g Heart and Soul.

**in the beginning of warsaw he didn't sing like that. he shouted more**

But it's not surprising since they were doing a lot of punkish/stooges-ish material in Warsaw and early JD.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 09:09 (twenty years ago)

I'd go with "Closer".

David A. makes a good point when he says he wonders if he hears cold as opposed to dark because of the album covers. I've always felt "Closer" as being chilly, ghostly, pristine and beautiful partly because of the sleeve artwork. (I always thought it was odd that i so closely associated the album with the feeling the artwork gave me.)

Neil FC (Neil FC), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 11:30 (twenty years ago)

but couldn't the artwork be misleading and manipulative? it doesn't convince me at all as an aid to describe/classify the music. and anyways the cover of closer shows a necrophile scene cast in marble. is there anything more goth in the world than necrophilia?

the cover of u.p. actually is pretty much in line with the music. it shows a dying star. more precisely 80 pulses of a pulsar (neutron star) which is what stays of a mass-rich star after a supernova.

alex in mainhattan (alex63), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)

I would def. not associate Closer with cold, whereas the hollow sound of UP always evokes the image of a freezing empty warehouse at night (with the sound effects on "Insight" feeling like stumbling on something in the dark).
Closer on the other hand strikes me as a boiling tarpit, in much the same way as The Cure's Pornography.

Baaderonixxx le Jeune (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)

I think the cover art/sleeve design might be one reason why I have not yet latched on to Closer--the whole album just seems so plain and boring to me, and I think that might be because of the whiteness of it all, not because of the sound of it

Curt1s St3ph3ns, Tuesday, 15 March 2005 19:57 (twenty years ago)

If I have to choose between the two, and I don't, I'd pick Closer. But I'd sooner pick Still or Preston .. somehow shitty recordings of Joy Division are preferable to me...

dave225 (Dave225), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:03 (twenty years ago)

Unknown Pleasures. But if I was to play any JD right now it would probably be disc 3 from Heart and Soul. It is fucking end-to-end gold.

David Merryweather (DavidM), Tuesday, 15 March 2005 20:11 (twenty years ago)

Only Joy Division I listen to anymore are the live records

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 11 April 2015 17:17 (ten years ago)

i know what you mean , ez. why the hell did i never see them live, that's the biggesst reproach i make myself. but somehow i was more into ecm and keith jarrett at the time. what is the best live recording? les bains douches is very powerful but the chaotic preston in a way fits them quite well as everything is falling apart...

it's the distortion, stupid! (alex in mainhattan), Saturday, 11 April 2015 20:22 (ten years ago)

I don't know if there is a best. I like all of them about equally. Les Bains Douches and Preston are great, as are the ULU and Factory sets on the expanded Closer and Unknown Pleasures.

EZ Snappin, Saturday, 11 April 2015 22:51 (ten years ago)

two years pass...

I'm glad there was a lot of debate here. I was afraid ilx would go in for Unknown Pleasures for some reason. And Closer is better.

Treeship, Saturday, 26 August 2017 21:04 (eight years ago)

prefer closer, to me the songs and performances sound less scrappy and more solid and assured.. they sounds like giants. truly sad to think of what might have been. ayo.

brimstead, Sunday, 27 August 2017 03:08 (eight years ago)

Imagine if New Order had depressive Ian Curtis vocals, the possibilities are limitless...

Moodles, Sunday, 27 August 2017 04:37 (eight years ago)

Curtis' suicide apart, I'm quite happy with the way things turned out, to be honest.

more Allegro-like (Turrican), Sunday, 27 August 2017 10:15 (eight years ago)

Well it's 1969 OK all across the USA
It's another year for me and you
Another year with nothing to do

Last year I was 21 I didn't have a lot of fun
And now I'm gonna be 22 I say oh my and a boo-hoo
It's 1969 OK all across the USA
It's another year for me and you

Another year with nothing to do
Another year with nothing to do

It's 1969
1969 1969 1969 1969 baby
And it's 1969 baby
Baby
Baby
Baby

Neves Say Neves Again (Noodle Vague), Sunday, 27 August 2017 10:21 (eight years ago)

*sigh*

brimstead, Sunday, 27 August 2017 16:32 (eight years ago)

Unknown Pleasures is great and groundbreaking thanks to Martin Hannett. Closer is the band catching up.

Imagine if New Order had depressive Ian Curtis vocals, the possibilities are limitless.

You have heard Movement, no?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WU3w0f9NPnk

tactical piñata (Sanpaku), Sunday, 27 August 2017 19:09 (eight years ago)

they're both perfect imo.

Unknown Pleasures is great and groundbreaking thanks to Martin Hannett. Closer is the band catching up.

one listen to their their live show around the release of UP shows that it would have sounded amazing no matter who produced it. those songs burned intensely, live. i like hannett's production on UP, but the performers and songwriters deserve the credit for UP's god status, not hannett.

Karl Malone, Sunday, 27 August 2017 19:20 (eight years ago)

sanpaku he was being sarcastic i'm pretty sure

brimstead, Sunday, 27 August 2017 22:47 (eight years ago)

Well we know what George Michael preferred

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUrwmPnL-ec

I like 'Closer' a lot more. I think I actually heard the 'Still' versions of all the 'Closer' tracks first and that had a big impact on the songs I preferred by Joy Division initially.

yesca, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:14 (eight years ago)

truly sad to think of what might have been.

would Ian Curtis still be a fascist & misogynist?

crüt, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:21 (eight years ago)

You're a real dumbass if you believe Ian Curtis was a fascist or had any sympathies for fascism #smdh

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:47 (eight years ago)

Sorry but c'mon man

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:49 (eight years ago)

both these albums are overrated tbh

marcos, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:55 (eight years ago)

hate to break it to y'all

marcos, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:55 (eight years ago)

Overrated or not, the answer is still Closer iirc

Le Bateau Ivre, Sunday, 27 August 2017 23:58 (eight years ago)

I was just thinking about how impressive it is these are not overrated considering their memelike countercultural reputations

Listen to my homeboy Fantano (D-40), Monday, 28 August 2017 00:04 (eight years ago)

Overrated? Give me a second side that is better than Closer's second side.

Zelda Zonk, Monday, 28 August 2017 00:04 (eight years ago)

ian comes off as a difficult and troubled person (perhaps understandable given severe illness + unexpected fame + being young and stupid like anyone is at his age) in deborah curtis's book, but not really either "fascist" or "misogynist," espec given that there were actual nazi sympathizers in UK punk/postpunk music at that time and JD was notably not among them

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 28 August 2017 00:09 (eight years ago)

It's not 1981 anymore people, the Joy Div = Fascists/Nazi's thing has been done to death. Show me concluding evidence or the smoking gun of how Joy Div/Ian Curtis were fascists or nazi sympathizers or misogynists, or gtfo. It so, so played.

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 28 August 2017 00:16 (eight years ago)

He did vote Tory though, the twat.

Wewlay Bewlay (Tom D.), Monday, 28 August 2017 00:19 (eight years ago)

There is that :(

Le Bateau Ivre, Monday, 28 August 2017 00:19 (eight years ago)

i was probably a little loose with the word fascist but he was absolutely a misogynist. i like unknown pleasures a lot btw.

crüt, Monday, 28 August 2017 00:39 (eight years ago)

overrated.. theres that word again

brimstead, Monday, 28 August 2017 18:57 (eight years ago)

truly sad to think of what might have been.
would Ian Curtis still be a fascist & misogynist?

― crüt, Sunday, August 27, 2017 4:21 PM (yesterday) Bookmark Flag Post Permalink

oh for crying out loud, does this place have badges for posts like these or something? I'M SORRY

brimstead, Monday, 28 August 2017 19:02 (eight years ago)

Freudenabteilung were brothels at concentration camps. They wore flap pocketed shirts similar to those of the Blackshirts or Brownshirts. The cover of their first 7":

https://e.snmc.io/lk/l/l/71919d0fc3a1f040e13e7fa4e32c8a47/6331068.jpg

JD were no more fascist than they were radio astronomers (UK's cover). But toying with fascist aesthetics is rather shaky ground, ethically speaking.

tactical piñata (Sanpaku), Monday, 28 August 2017 21:29 (eight years ago)

UK Unknown Pleasure's cover

tactical piñata (Sanpaku), Monday, 28 August 2017 21:31 (eight years ago)

i'm curious if the "misogynist" label comes from what we know abt ian curtis in real life (which i won't argue w/ since it's been years since i read touching from a distance and prob have forgotten a lot of details) or from his lyrics, which mostly strike me as opaque/obscure enough that it's hard to identify any particular POV in them

and yeah the "joy division" name itself is pretty gross

(The Other) J.D. (J.D.), Monday, 28 August 2017 21:52 (eight years ago)

Which is why

Bernard Sumner 4ever.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 August 2017 22:15 (eight years ago)

I agree with marcos that both albums are overrated, but I'd go with UP, as about half of it is great. Atrocity Exhibition/Isolation makes for a very arresting opening, but otherwise I just don't get Closer.

Freedom, Monday, 28 August 2017 22:22 (eight years ago)

(xp) Bernard Albrecht surely?

Wewlay Bewlay (Tom D.), Monday, 28 August 2017 22:24 (eight years ago)

That's not his name either.

the Rain Man of nationalism. (Alfred, Lord Sotosyn), Monday, 28 August 2017 22:25 (eight years ago)

I still don't quite understand, would the albums be better if they were adequately rated? How is it interesting information in any way? Taste Jenga woo-hoo!!

brimstead, Monday, 28 August 2017 23:13 (eight years ago)

i'm curious if the "misogynist" label comes from what we know abt ian curtis in real life (which i won't argue w/ since it's been years since i read touching from a distance and prob have forgotten a lot of details) or from his lyrics, which mostly strike me as opaque/obscure enough that it's hard to identify any particular POV in them

I'm basing it on what I know about his real life

crüt, Thursday, 31 August 2017 21:53 (eight years ago)

"otherwise I just don't get Closer."

I don't get YOU

akm, Friday, 1 September 2017 02:45 (eight years ago)

Closer

I like the Hannett production on UP, but I kinda wish there were two versions of that album. One where those songs rip like they do live.

circa1916, Friday, 1 September 2017 02:47 (eight years ago)

yeah, i agree with that too. i'm guessing hannett added the effects directly onto the masters? otherwise you'd think a special deluxe "dry" version would have been released by now

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 September 2017 02:58 (eight years ago)

they are both the best albums. no need to choose between them! and british kids in the 70s were obsessed with WWII. everyone knows that. its in all the books.

scott seward, Friday, 1 September 2017 03:33 (eight years ago)

Didn't realize that the phrase "unknown pleasures" was taken from Proust until reading Proust a few years ago. Feel like there was one other thing Curtis lifted from him, but can't remember what it was.

circa1916, Friday, 1 September 2017 04:12 (eight years ago)

Pretty clued in reader for his age and period and place though, I give him that.

circa1916, Friday, 1 September 2017 04:13 (eight years ago)

Closer has wall-to-wall great songs on it whereas Unknown Pleasures doesn't, the production is better on the whole on Closer and the band perform better. This isn't even a competition.

more Allegro-like (Turrican), Friday, 1 September 2017 05:54 (eight years ago)

can't think of any wall-to-wall great songs on unknown pleasures, i think we can all agree on that

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 September 2017 06:04 (eight years ago)

oh wait, i think i misunderstood - you mean that closer has one good song after another while unknown pleasures has a few duds that break up the flow.

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 September 2017 06:14 (eight years ago)

i think i might agree with closer being a more consistent album. but the heights of unknown pleasures are so overwhelmingly good that it doesn't make any sense to me to declare one unimpeachably better than the other. they're both amazing.

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 September 2017 06:15 (eight years ago)

Closer doesn't have 'I Remember Nothing' on it, so it pretty much wins on that alone.

more Allegro-like (Turrican), Friday, 1 September 2017 06:33 (eight years ago)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvPIvoJkmGs

Karl Malone, Friday, 1 September 2017 06:37 (eight years ago)

Hahahaha!

more Allegro-like (Turrican), Friday, 1 September 2017 06:42 (eight years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.