Outhud - Let Us Never Speak of It Again

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
What's the feeling on this one? I'm loving it and have been suprised that more folks haven't been talking 'bout it. I think the vocals really do add to it. If you don't love it, why not? Thank you.

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Let us never speak of it again, please.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, h. You're a big party pooper.

Actually, there are at least two other threads on this album, but the search function is slow ass right now.

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:27 (twenty-one years ago)

just started listening last night...a different feel from the last one but i dig it. ...ethereal disco.

mono.mono (mono.mono), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:28 (twenty-one years ago)

here's one of the other threads: Out Hud - Let Us Never Speak Of It Again

i'll say it again though - i think it's fanfuckingtastic.

jermaine (jnoble), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes. I agree that h is a party pooper (although I don't know him well enough to say this). I certainly loved the last one, but I can't see how folks aren't just as excited about this one. It's very disco-y and pop-y, but it's still very schizophrenic in the best of ways. It stays interesting because of this. I'm very pleased. hstencil, what are your issues with it?

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:34 (twenty-one years ago)

1. they suck.
2. their music sucks.
3. they couldn't dance their way out of a paper bag.
4. white man's overbite.
5. etc., etc., "dance" music for indie dweebs who don't go dancing.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

h,

what would you recommend for indie dweebs or dweebs or anyone who does go dancing? why can't one dance to this? must your dances maintain regularity?

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:46 (twenty-one years ago)

it's not danceable. go to one house music club, see/hear how it's done.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

also ugliest album art ever.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:48 (twenty-one years ago)

I know the people in the band pitch little fits because no one dances at their live shows, but that's only a minor annoyance. Listening to the record at home, I'm not thinking "dance."

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:49 (twenty-one years ago)

it's so much more of an actual dance-for-people-who-like-dance 'dance' album than 89.6% of all other indie-dance i've ever heard!

jermaine (jnoble), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:52 (twenty-one years ago)

that's saying a lot.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Is it possible that you can dance to it even though it isn't just like what you might hear in a "house music club"? Expansion can be positive.

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 17:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Maybe since I could never EVER dance to house music, that is one reason why I totally disagree with h.
Also, when a friend and I went to see them live 2 years ago, and most everyone was dancin within seconds of their opening. I highly recommend them, and am travelling 5 hours to see them in a couple of weeks.

(point of reference: some of this "indie dweeb's" alltime fave dance tunes: I Can't Stand It When You Touch Me/Eighth Wonder/
Think (About It)/I Feel Love/Holy Ghost
)

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Nope. Expansion is only negative.

x-post

Johnny Fever (johnny fever), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Reason 2: I really don't give a half of a shit about album art

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm gonna be really glad when they finally leave on tour.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Contracton.

x-post

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Reason 3: I always thought of house music as being the modern rhythmic equivalent to Stars on 45

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:10 (twenty-one years ago)

if you guys are so afraid to read dissenting opinions, why the hell did you start this thread? go start a fanclub.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i won't have this turn into an out hud versus house music thread! they are not opposed!!

jermaine (jnoble), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)

out hud vs. horse music.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't mind Out Hud as much when they were a more boring Pell Mell.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:14 (twenty-one years ago)

H, all in the name of discourse. I like hearing reasons not to like something I'm really enjoying so as to further question my liking of it and discover my true feelings. Now that's advanced listening.

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:16 (twenty-one years ago)

whatever dude, asking people nicely to explain why they don't like something and then crying foul when they do explain is a bitch move.

and outhud still sucks, fools.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:19 (twenty-one years ago)

this is a great record...




































...FOR ME TO POOP ON!!!

charleston charge (chaki), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:20 (twenty-one years ago)

hstencil = angry.

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:22 (twenty-one years ago)

For you guys who honestly like the new Out Hud, you should check out the recent LTM reissue of Severed Heads' Rotund For Success. It's not all instrumental certainly, and not all of the songs are 4/4, but it was a mid-period era Severed Heads album (1989) that did a nice fusion of 4/4 New Order-ish dance music, with a prototype of "indie melodies", and enough very odd early synth noises and tape loops to probably make your hips shake... yet is 100 times more dynamic and fun.

For you guys who liked earlier Out Hud, GET ONE PELL MELL ALBUM. Flow, Interstate, Star City are all great. (Not to ignore Rhyming Guitars nor The Bumper Crop, but those are earlier more snappy fast-paced post-punkish Pell Mell releases... great, but not a great segue out of early Out Hud)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd agree that they do one of the better takes on this whole indie/CIF/dance/punk-funk thing. But when you listen to this as a house/dance fan, you can't help but feel this (and many other bands of their ilk) is like 75% whiney indie/post-rock noodling and 25% dance/disco/house. So I sort of feel can empathize Hstencil on "dance music for dweebs" POV. The same sort of macho swagger is all over the LCD Soundsystem album, and it sorta bugs me (although I can see why it thrills so many people.)

( xpost )

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll take 'em over pretty much any numlaut-folk, kthxbye

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:27 (twenty-one years ago)

This is one of the best records of the year so far. One of the first things to come from NY "dance punk" that you can actually dance to un-ironically. I said it on the other thread but it sounds like a house-ified Tom Tom Club.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks for the recommendations donut. Since I enjoy both "early" and "late" Outhud, I'll check out both.

x-post

matt2 (matt2), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:36 (twenty-one years ago)

i am a house/dance fan! my friends sign me up for 'free issue' literary supplements under the name "mr. tiefschwarz"! (that proves... something, alright!! we need to get spencer and ronan in here. i know at least one of them likes this record.

xpost!

jermaine (jnoble), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Well of course there will be house/dance fans who can get over the "indie-ness" apparent in the vocals or stylings or whatever. I'm not saying this as some dance elitist who can't cross over to the "other side," as I do love a couple of tracks on this record (mainly "It's For You" and "One Life To Live") and did generally like most of the first !!! record.

It just seems that most of these bands tilt the scale to indie instead of dance, when I'd like to see more results of what happens when the scale is tilted the other way, ie the Superpitcher Remix of "The Dream of Evan and Chan," Martini Bros remixing Tok-Tok's "Missy Queen," the latest techno-rock records by Jake Fairley, Alter Ego, Quasimodo Jones, and T Raumschiere, etc.

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:53 (twenty-one years ago)

dahnce music has plenty of lousy or annoying singing in it, nothing terribly "indie" there. plus the 11-minute cut on the Out Hud album sounds like the Chemical Brothers. anyway, as a dance music fan who likes and listens to actual dance music, I like this record a lot, whatever its provenance or the one-upmanship of indie fans.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:57 (twenty-one years ago)

h:

What are three of your alltime fave dance tunes? I only ask so that those who haven't heard this thread's album can make a clearer choice based on reference points that are more substantial than "sucks", "indie dweebs", "white man's overbite", etc.

BTW, I don't mind the dissenting opinion. Its not like we don't agree on other things. Same goes for me and donut, who I share many opinions with, but certainly not SHeads.

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 18:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Same question to you Matos: what is your version of actual dance music?

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i have a feeling stence's opinion is colored a bit by having to deal with the NYC douchebag hipster aspects of this band. mine is too, FWIW.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

...cuz its an interesting thing how one person's great dance song is another's dullsville, and vice versa

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

dahnce music, you mean? three off the top of my head: Beltram, "Energy Flash"; Omni Trio, "Mystic Stepper (Feel Better)"; Armand Van Helden ft. Roland Clark, "Flowerz"

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:03 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, I was being facetious about "actual dance music" there--I was tweaking Stencil. Ian's post just above about hipsterism coloring opinion feels accurate to me.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, I'm glad dance has a lot of lousy singing (makes me feel a little better about my own crap voice!)

I guess I was refering to the whiny Ben Gibbard/Grandaddy/Flaming Lips type vocals that seldom appear in House.

xpost

Michael F Gill (Michael F Gill), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:06 (twenty-one years ago)

My dance music love goes back to when i first started actively listening to top 40 radio in my single digit years.. I hated the Doobie Brothers, The Eagles, Bruce Springsteen, Billy Joel, Eddie Money, et al.. but i loved Donna Summer, Kano, Kraftwerk, Con Funk Shun, The Gap Band, Franki Smith, Rick James, Michael Jackson, Chic, The Whispers, etc. (I did like some rock music, but the most "rock" it ever got was XTC. Black Sea was the first "rock" album I ever bought, or asked my mom to buy) I was always into computers and all of these artists seemed more "computer"-like or robotic music to me.. the fact that they were also very danceable was actually a side issue, but subconsciously branded my brain forever...

Even when I started getting into more aggressive music, the disco/dance aspect remained, hence my love of Wax Trax!/Nettwerk/Antler/Subway type stuff in the mid to late 80s...(I did get to discover non dance bands like Fugazi and Minor Threat via Pailhead.. and then there were the 12" one-offs by Foetus/Wiseblood, Coil, Minimal Compact, Blackouts, and other off-the-beaten-path stuff on Wax Trax! that way.. they were, oddly enough, a gateway record label for me. If it weren't for that first Meat Beat album for example, issued on Wax Trax stateside way back when, I wouldn't have gotten into hip hop so rabidly in the early 90s... (I liked Run DMC and Beastie Boys and the Sugarhill Gang back then, but more for their novelty value, admittedly)

(for anyone that cared...)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I honestly love reading about the history of one's tastes, and I think that it helps others put current opinions into perspective. Thanks, donut.

peepee (peepee), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I think this album is great, especially the first half. The sequencing is really nice. I've always admired the broader sonic palette that Out Hud brings to the neo-dance-punk party, but tracks like "It's For You" and "One Life to Leave" and "How Long" are also really catchy from a pop angle. (Especially since I don't hear the vocals as "indie" trying to be pop or dance, like !!!: no, they're cool and rhythmic and kinda breathy and totally pop unto themselves.) (Oh, and Donut, I only have Interstate, but I don't hear Pell Mell at all in Out Hud: Pell Mell always seemed to me like a post-rock band that no scene wanted to accept, but way more organic and warm and, I dunno, heartland-sounding than Out Hud.)

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:27 (twenty-one years ago)

(Oh, and Donut, I only have Interstate, but I don't hear Pell Mell at all in Out Hud: Pell Mell always seemed to me like a post-rock band that no scene wanted to accept, but way more organic and warm and, I dunno, heartland-sounding than Out Hud.)

heh, well Pell Mell started in 1980.. did you mean post-punk instead of post-rock? :) Yeah, no scene wanted them, so I'll stop talking about them, since they're irrelevant by that definition.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

(I'll be starting a Pell Mell/Steve Fisk/Greg Freeman/etc. thread tonight.. once I have a gander at that first Pell Mell EP, so I can try to piece together a history of the band, and why I think they are very indirectly influential to a lot of rock music we listen to today.)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 28 March 2005 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I've always admired the broader sonic palette that Out Hud brings to the neo-dance-punk party, but tracks like "It's For You" and "One Life to Leave" and "How Long" are also really catchy from a pop angle.

Jaymc is correct. Additionally, this record doesn't sound like it's saying "this is a band" or "this can be reproduced live" or "we care that this is reproduceable live". The fact that the vocals are so faceless adds to the house-ness, and they don't really seem indie at all. They're very detached yet rhythmic (as has already been said). The Severed Heads comparison is interesting and superficially correct, but they're coming from very different places, and again the overall vibe I get from the Out Hud record is Tom Tom Club as opposed to something on Nettwerk. There's something almost Balearic (vague term I know) about this record too.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

What are three of your alltime fave dance tunes?

hard to say, there's so many good ones from so many different eras! and i know it's perverse but sometimes i take the chuck eddy line and think that a lot of rock is funkier/more danceable than some "dance music."

but 3 off the top of my head: "acid tracks," "quebec nightclub," "demented drums"

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 20:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't know wtf "get one less ocd" is supposed to mean or who it's directed to. You gave 5 reasons why you don't like them, all of which centered around them not being "real" dance music. If that is just one of a multitude of reasons why you hate them, then perhaps you should've, y'know, listed the other reasons.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 22:27 (twenty-one years ago)

1. they suck.
2. their music sucks.

These do not in any way relate to authenticity; they are subjective assessments.

Ian John50n (orion), Monday, 28 March 2005 22:30 (twenty-one years ago)

spencer weren't there plenty of "rock bands" around when the acid house style was popularized (ie. manchester late 80s)?

Rock bands in 1985 aren't especially relevant to the development of Acid House. It basically comes from black and/or gay clubs and the radio in Chicago in the mid 80s. It traveled to Europe and eventually indie bands began to consciously incorporate electronic "dance" elements (especially '89-'91). But LCD Soundsystem seems to be celebrating the rawness of that '86 sound and reappropriating it as rock - which I don't have a particular problem with, but it's nice to remember how revolutionary it was and part of that is it's provenance and what it meant for many listeners at the time.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

Ian I assumed the reason why he think they suck is that they don't make real dance music. If he would've expanded on why they suck other than just saying they're not real dance music, then I wouldn't have made that assumption.
regardless, this just seems like the same ol "oh you only like this shit cause you don't know about the REAL THING" snobbish b.s.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Rock bands in 1985 aren't especially relevant to the development of Acid House. It basically comes from black and/or gay clubs and the radio in Chicago in the mid 80s. It traveled to Europe and eventually indie bands began to consciously incorporate electronic "dance" elements (especially '89-'91). But LCD Soundsystem seems to be celebrating the rawness of that '86 sound and reappropriating it as rock - which I don't have a particular problem with, but it's nice to remember how revolutionary it was and part of that is it's provenance and what it meant for many listeners at the time.

that wasn't my question. and obv. since it has been recentered around other things, isn't there more than one way to perceive it? isn't it a rather, um, rockist view to say it can only have one version of authenticity (Chicago '85, maaaaan)?

they suck because they're shitty people who make craptastic music that even if it was danceable, would still suck - that good enough for ya oops?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 22:52 (twenty-one years ago)

A lot of the late 80s Madchester bands certainly liked to act as if they incorporated elements of acid house but I can't really think of any examples of where it actually happened. Hardly any even meddled with a proper house beat! "Back To Life" is a much better dance music reference point for most madchester indie-dance than any acid house is.

Tim Finney (Tim Finney), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, good point. I always felt indie dance at that time was a bit 'slow'. Also, I could never understand why "Back to Life" was always lumped in with house at the time! The Garage reworkings made me rethink it a bit, but even then it seemed shoe-horned into the tempo.

And Hstencil, if you read my words carefully, you'll notice that I am very careful about not saying that there's only one way to perceive/receive Acid House - obviously I would never say that there's only one authentic history. I will say that Out Hud are truer in spirit to the way I experienced house music "back in the day" than say LCD Soundsystem.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:08 (twenty-one years ago)

personally i think the 80s crop of madchester stuff (not all of which i like, at all) is still more interesting musically and more fun to listen to than most of the current revival.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

why you such a grouch?

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

why do you care?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

cause it's annoying.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:30 (twenty-one years ago)

not as annoying as you caring!

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:32 (twenty-one years ago)

but i admit i'm touched by your concern.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:33 (twenty-one years ago)

obviously to me it is!
but really, i don't know why you assume i care. i don't. go on being a grouch, it's okay.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:34 (twenty-one years ago)

to be fair, the only experienc I've had with Outhud is through one album (which I thought was in between not bad and good). I know nothing of the band as people or their fans. If I did, perhaps I'd have as much vitriol for them as you do.

()ops (()()ps), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:36 (twenty-one years ago)

only listened to it once so far (although i doubt i'll get round to a second) and i have to say it is a real let down. the bands own 12" mix of 'one night to leave' was awesome - brilliantly produced, innovative, interesting and a dancefloor destroyer. the album just seems kind of weak, like it was made with fruityloops or something. nothing really leapt out at me. maybe they should do a remix version?

stirmonster, Monday, 28 March 2005 23:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I used to have a pretty big thing for Pell Mell. I wrote a letter to the band once, one of 'em wrote me back. Didn't know they started as far back as 1980. Wouldn't mind hearing them again, it's been quite a while.

Bimble... (Bimble...), Monday, 28 March 2005 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, this turned out to be an odd thread. I'd just like to say that I like the new album, but not as much as STREETDAD, and not as much as Outhud live.

peepee (peepee), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Has anyone else noticed the disc has a pull-out quote from Pitchfork stuck to its wrapper?

sneekycheeks (nader), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 02:11 (twenty-one years ago)

Donut, I still don't get that criticism.

Well, the crux of my point is that the album just really bores me. That's mainly it, and usually enough. We'll agree to disagree here.

As for the whole MIDI thing.. well, this is probably just the software music geek in me talking, but if you've ever played with any music making software, downloaded from a demo, for example, they usually come with demo songs you can open and play, so you can see how it all works. Usually these demo songs are really awful, written off just for the purpose of the demo, and not for a greater purpose. Also, these demos show are meant to show off the MIDI features. (MIDI in brief is just a way to store note/loudness/timbre information very efficiently without needing to bother with the actual raw sound data itself.. very efficient, and customizable, as you can assign any virtual instrument to a MIDI channel). Usually, your computer is set to these default values for MIDI. You know back in the late 90s when every web page would automatically download a song playing in the background that all sounded like the same cheap software band on your machine playing it? That's MIDI in action. Anyway, my point was that when I listened to a chunk of the new Out Hud, it seemed like they used those default MIDI instruments and didn't bother coming up with more interesting timbres for their music... again, a very specific complaint from a very specific P.O.V... but, unless it's meant to funny or a novelty, cheap MIDI music is just a bad, bad thing in my book... and I'm very surprised that a band like Out Hud chose that aesthetic for their synth sounds.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)

But I know exactly what you're talking about, and I'll still agree to disagree!

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

It's quite good I think, I'm not sure I'd play it but one of the DJs at our club has been. I do agree it's probably alot better an effort at dance music than most of the whole scene it's from, but then maybe the point of the rest of that scene isn't to make dance music, but punk funk, or yeah aor music like the LCD Soundsystem record. (sorry!)

Punk funk album which is a better effort at dance than others is still inferior to just listening to dance, but as I say, I did quite like what I heard of this (30 minutes in a car journey)

I'm enjoying the Whitey album alot lately too, though that is ALOT more rockey.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 29 March 2005 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I like this. I'm listening to it twice in a row.

sleep (sleep), Monday, 4 April 2005 17:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I really like this. But everytime I listen to it, I end up concentrating on something else (phone calls, cooking, driving in dense traffic, etc.) through the second half and don't really hear it! So at least the first half is great!

sleep (sleep), Friday, 8 April 2005 17:13 (twenty years ago)

if i've listene to last half of htis record i wasn't aware of it. i go into meditation. first half it great but all in all it feels like music you'd listen to while shopping for cool hipster clothes. there's something EXTREMELY SHALLOW about this music. maybe exemplified in the "uh uh uh uh uh uh uh" in the 3rd track - the make no mistake i might be playing frenetic disco but i'm still a fucking bored hipster with a voice affectation. but its OTM with what its trying to do i think.

Susan Douglas (Susan Douglas), Friday, 8 April 2005 23:16 (twenty years ago)

As I feared, polarising opinions galore. Personally, I think the new record's fun (in a very pop way) and lush...not as kaleidoscopic and free-form as its predecessor but none the worse for it. It makes me smile.

Ian Riese-Moraine. To Hell with you and your gradual evolution! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:00 (twenty years ago)

what is fearsome about polarizing opinions?

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:06 (twenty years ago)

Expected, not feared. Je regrette.

Ian Riese-Moraine. To Hell with you and your gradual evolution! (Eastern Mantra), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:07 (twenty years ago)

je ne regrette rien, pal.

hstencil (hstencil), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:08 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
Going to see them at the Casbah in San Diego tonight. I thought they were great last time I saw em (with the less great !!! at knitting factory) so I can't wait. I guess they're in LA tomorrow night too.

tylero (tylero), Wednesday, 1 June 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)

Out Hud! In the middle of our S.T.R.E.E.T. D.A.D.

Ian Riese-Moraine's all but an ark-lark! (Eastern Mantra), Thursday, 2 June 2005 00:04 (twenty years ago)

heard this for the first time last night. it's nice enough i guess but i thought it was meant to be a bit more impressive than this?

shine headlights on me (electricsound), Thursday, 2 June 2005 00:18 (twenty years ago)

They were really good tonight. How come hot hot hot hipster chicks can dance to this 130 bpm 4/4 music but not the 130bpm 4/4 (proper dahnce) music I dj at the club gigs I get?

tylero (tylero), Thursday, 2 June 2005 07:42 (twenty years ago)

proper dahnce?????
like what?

peepee (peepee), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:29 (twenty years ago)

House, Detroit Techno, Electrohouse.

tylero (tylero), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

This has remained one of my favorite albums so far this year (admittedly in a year in which I haven't been wowed by a whole lot of stuff). I like to put it on my stereo machine in the morning and dance around my apartment.

Scott CE (Scott CE), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:54 (twenty years ago)

oh.
personally, and no offense, that's not my (nor hipster chicks') "proper dance"

But I kinda know what you mean, cuz I don't really like house or Detroit Techno or the such, but I like this Outhud stuff. Maybe cuz its different enough.

peepee (peepee), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

er, xpost

peepee (peepee), Thursday, 2 June 2005 15:59 (twenty years ago)

Frankly, it's slightly more "rock" which even girls now expect - other dance music being to "gay" or something at this point (since corny conservative indie has almost fully appropriated it). On the other hand, the vocals are kind of breezy and girly lacadaisical fun in a "Genius of Love" kind of way, so I can see why it's a hit with the ladies.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 June 2005 16:57 (twenty years ago)

dick cheney is indie.

gygax! (gygax!), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:12 (twenty years ago)

?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:30 (twenty years ago)

haha, spencer, i think it was your use of "corny conservative indie"

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:32 (twenty years ago)

It's funny though, the parts that blew the crowd up the most were when the front 3 (one guy and 2 chix) members of the group put their insturments down and the guy on the mixing board and bassist just played about 20 minutes straight of jacking beats and basslines, with cool fx on the percussion parts...kind of like...house/techno etc. I guess it's all about context. Too bad, one day I'll find my xanadu where people from both sides of the techno/indie divide cross back and forth so freely that the divide isn't even there anymore.

tylero (tylero), Thursday, 2 June 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

By and large if it doesn't have vocals people won't dance to the records I'm playing when I play out. Or at least they really only tolerate instrumental music as punctuation. I am fairly sure that this has much more to do with the people and the place than the records as I'm confident they work well at other places. Consequently I wind up being given to buying slightly trendier (not necessarily in a bad way) records than I might otherwise.

firstworldman (firstworldman), Thursday, 2 June 2005 19:07 (twenty years ago)

- other dance music being to "gay" or something at this point (since corny conservative indie has almost fully appropriated it).

what??! where are you hearing this from? also, have u been to firecracker yet, in chinatown?

Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:35 (twenty years ago)

No, what's it all about?

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:40 (twenty years ago)

it happens once a month....i mite b goin this friday!


Chinatown's Firecracker Poppin'

June 14, 2001

By Heseon Park, Special to The Times

The word is out, finally, on the underground scene at Firecracker in Chinatown, a spirited tribal gathering that transcends genre or trends.

Once a strictly word-of-mouth gathering at the Grand Star lounge in old Chinatown, Firecracker is a revolution of sorts in a city rife with clubs built on image and attitude.

Firecracker's promoters, Lisa Yu, Daryl Chou and Jim Kang, took a landmark Chinatown locale, flooded it with a truly diverse club crowd and laced it with a steady dose of urban art, spoken word, hip-hop, street culture and jazz. Being colorblind is de rigueur at Firecracker, and the result is an atmosphere the likes of which is rarely witnessed in L.A.

The turnout and vibe seen at Firecracker have proven to be an inspiration to more than its legion of fans. A documentary about the club is in the works, and a local artist, Chaz Bojorquez, known as the godfather of West Coast graffiti art, has exhibited his work in the lounge. "Chino Latino," his assemblage of chiseled letters and calligraphy, was directly influenced by the diverse scene at Firecracker.

Exhibiting work, both visual and performance-based, from local artists was one of the reasons Firecracker was started. It began as a onetime poetry slam party for friends, gained a loyal following, and recently had its two-year anniversary. Promoter Jim Kang explains, "We wanted to form an intersection of literary arts, new media, vocal talent, poetry and film in a socially enlivening kind of place."

During most of the semi-monthly Friday sessions, you'll find the Grand Star lounge packed to the point that compatriots spill out into the alleyways as the night wears on. Inside Firecracker, a mix of the past and present seems to unite everyone. In the retro-red Grand Star lounge is a jazz trio made up of Yasuko Kawano, bassist Al Hines and drummer Ed Hinton, downstairs. Upstairs, the "Firecrew," deejays Wing Ko, Logic, Positron, Eric Coleman, Alfred Hawkins and Chris Boogie, help keep the dance floor moving at a steady pace.

"The aesthetic is real hip-hop music, not the fake corporate stuff," says KCRW's Garth Trinidad, who's also been a guest turntablist. "You never know when any of those cats get daring and throw in some surprises." Past deejay guests include Raymond Roker, founder of URB magazine, J-Rocc, Jun from Bossa Nova, Supernatural, Daz and Umoja HiFi. Promoter Kang says that when he's working the front door, he sees the whole thing come together. "The jazz band's playing the standards downstairs, they play things from the bebop era and all kinds of groovy stuff and they end with Frank Sinatra. They're influencing the guys upstairs and there's mutual understanding. You have hip-hop music upstairs drawing the crowd from downstairs, and it flows through this space."

Crossing lines, whether it's color, music, neighborhood or style, is inevitable here. Firecracker regular Christina Ochoa, who works at the arts center Self Help Graphics in East L.A., explains, "The energy at Firecracker is vibrant, there's a pulse to it we're attracted to .... It's a good feel; it's like a familia, it's family oriented there in a sense. That's why Chaz got inspired to do the 'Chino Latino' painting. It was the energy. It's what was happening in L.A."

That was the energy Kang had in mind. "L.A.'s such a sprawling metropolis," he says. "You're either merging on the freeway lanes or in the malls. I wanted to create a place that truly represented the demographics of L.A."

In a city that's known for subdivisions, tracts, neighborhoods, freeways, where going from one locale to the next requires decoding the Thomas Guide, Firecracker defies convention. And if you look close on a Friday night, you'll get a near-perfect, almost futuristic vision of L.A. and its inhabitants commingling in a space that draws inspiration from the past.

Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:49 (twenty years ago)

http://www.la.com/nightlife/danceclubs/firecracker/12785

Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:51 (twenty years ago)

okay maybe twice a month:

Firecracker

Two Fridays a month at Grand Star Restaurant on Broadway in Chinatown
Cover $10 (outside hip-hop party free)

Bustling with shoppers crowding its markets and restaurants by day, L.A.'s Chinatown seems like a ghost town after 10 p.m. on most nights.


However, twice a month on Fridays, Firecracker-an indoor/outdoor hip hop party-bursts onto the Chinatown scene at the Grand Star Restaurant on Broadway, sending sparks of color and energy through the otherwise quiet streets.


Firecracker is probably the closest thing in L.A. you'll get to a New York City street party. Just outside the restaurant, in a well-lit alley of sorts, rotating DJs spin hip hop, reggae, funk, and rare grooves. Everyone hangs out under the streetlamps, dancing in groups or freestyling alone, all the while wearing cool knit caps, stylish jeans, and funky accessories. A large portion of the crowd is made up of Asian men and women of mixed nationalities. Hip hop's wide influence on the Asian community is apparent, but all ethnicities are represented.


The outside scene is the most fun, not to mention free. It is also without question a smoker's paradise. The Friday I went, promoters at the Grand Star were handing out actual firecrackers (probably because it was close to 4th of July), and there were ample lighters on hand to set the ends ablaze. The alley filled with twizzle sticks of spark and cool flame-light danced before our eyes and the mood changed to magical.


For those who want to head inside, the downstairs of the restaurant offers live jazz, a full bar, and dinner if you get there before 10:00 p.m. The cover to go inside is $10. Upstairs, there is another DJ spinning primarily dance tunes, a dance floor, and another bar, but the inside offerings are not as compelling as the outdoor fiesta.


Firecracker is a breath of fresh air as far as the club scene goes in L.A. Mellow and unpretentious yet full of snap and sizzle, it captures the spirit of hip hop-multicultural and organic to the streets. Too bad it only happens twice a month.

Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:52 (twenty years ago)

a;so - i really like this Outhud album. i suspect if one doesnt, they either know the !!! ppl personally or just dislike dancing

Vichitravirya XI, Thursday, 2 June 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.