Buddy Holocaust -- forgotten anti-anti-establishment folk hero/martyr? or recent WFMU concocted hoax?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Relating back to the Afterthoughts thread from the EMP Pop Conference presentations, Eric Weisbard -- also notably one of the curators of this conference alongside his wife, Ann Powers, who both did a marvelous job, and are great great people to boot -- did a presentation himself on a character who went under the name of Buddy Holocaust. The following is the synopsis of the piece that can be found here as well, but I'll reproduce it here...

"The Buddy Holocaust Story"

On July 29, 1981, Bill Tate, a Dartmouth student, gave his only concert as Buddy Holocaust, "pragmatic nihilist" folk singer. "We will retake Saigon," he sang in one number, sounding like Phil Ochs in the employ of Oliver North. "Give me your love or I?ll destroy the world," went a more casual ditty. There was "Drugs Did This to Me" (he kills her and eats her) and "These Morons Have to Go (retching as he impersonates them)," both as catchy as they were hateful. Presumably, Tate was kidding: exaggerating the famous conservatism of his fellow students. But he brought a fierceness to the role, an embattled sense of humor, that made such conclusions suspect. Tate was too good at being Buddy Holocaust to resist him.

According to Rob Graff, "He performed dress[ed] in a military uniform to an audience that was not certain if he was serious or not (I?m not sure whether he knew himself for sure). . . . He dropped out of college just after the concert, and went to his parents house in Southern California (where they had moved from Chagrin Falls, OH). The story is that he shopped around the tape of his concert to folks in the music industry, and - perhaps not surprisingly - found little interest in its commercial potential. I heard that he died in the fall of 1981 when he drove his (parents?) car into a highway bridge piling at very high speed with no skid marks - an apparent suicide. Stark music. It?s been over 20 years, but some of his lines still haunt me."

Me too. I?ll dig more into the history, talk about how the tape found its way to Princeton, where we played it on college radio, to Columbia, where just last year an group called The Weirdo Party performed "That?ll Teach Ya, Hiroshima" in a group rendition with tuba, and to WFMU, where a digitized copy is about to hit the airwaves. The pop masquerade always, I think, holds mirrors up to mirrors. This will be a story about someone who got lost in the reflections.

...so, Eric gives his presentation, and he shows this flyer for the singular show that happened, for which he profusely thanked an old cohort of his who he used to go to Princeton with. It looks very much like a flyer I'd expected to be made for such a thing in 1981 or so.. very much photo-copying basics. He begins with the first song "Another Kent State" but Buddy introduces the song to the audience (paraphrasing): "Hope you're enjoying your dinner.. I'll warn you right now that you may vomit in the process.... Just a warning. Don't say I didn't tell you..." and then launches into a song where he aggressively strums his guitar, his sole musical instrument aside from his voice, and sings about wishing there would be another Kent State i.e. another annihilation of protesting hippies, because, of course, "they deserve it" "Wouldn't it be great.. to have another Kent State."

The songs above are also played. "What Drugs Did To Me" physically sickened me. I was this close to having a panic attack and passing out. I didn't expect this at all. I felt very disturbed by this. I figure that was the purpose.

(Also noteworthy, while I didn't hear every song on the tape, there were no swear words used ever in the clips I heard.)

Eric goes on to tell the story listed above, and presents the dilemma. How "kidding" was Buddy Holocaust? We'll never know.

It was a great piece, absolutely, despite my being VERY unnerved by the one song in particular. I won't name names, but one of the panelists and moderators for the conference behind me voiced EXTREME distress and dissent towards this song having been played... and I honestly felt good that someone else felt the same way as me.

After the entire panel (which was part of the Black Mass panel moderated by Alan Bishop of Sun City Girls) finished, I admittedly went up to Eric and asked if I could get a CDR copy of this Buddy Holocaust tape, and he told me, noddingly, "Let's talk about it"

...

So, I tell my friends on another online forum about Buddy Holocaust and present the synopsis above, and -- again, without naming names -- I get the reply from a friend, "I smell hoax".

I literally sunk into my chair at work reading those three words.

I fucking fell for it, didn't I? How embarrassing is that? Buddy Holocaust doesn't exist. This was obviously something that some characters at WFMU made up that makes for a great story about a long lost extreme obscurity figure for the purpose of this type of dialogue.. and given the whole masquerade theme of the conference, Eric and Ann must have played along -- Eric being a Princeton alumni himself -- keeping very straight faces during the presentation while they were unveiling this "story" about this guy, who really was just fabricated semi-recently.

Or was it?

I can't tell. I do believe there are people out there obscure enough to warrant a google search that only shows mostly links to plays on WMFU charts. On the other hand... hmmmmmmmmmmm.

In retrospect, this piece may have been more evocative than I thought.

For those of you who attended or not... thoughts?

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 23:08 (twenty years ago)

Did Tom Scharpling and Jon Wurster have anything to do with this?

Keith C (kcraw916), Monday, 18 April 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)

I only see a play from Mike Lupica via google, but that's it. No Tom nor Jon. (which doesn't necessarily mean they're not involved.. but this type of hoax is of a very different color for either, i'd think)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 23:51 (twenty years ago)

why does it have to be a hoax?

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 00:03 (twenty years ago)

I don't think anybody is saying it has to be a hoax. That's why I posed the question.

This thread could be the hoax.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 00:11 (twenty years ago)

I mean, if you want to find out if something is real or not in this context, especially when the protagnist in question is dead, the only path for one to take is to look for evidence that it could be a hoax. There's no logical way, short of stalking Bill Tate's parents, to prove that it's NOT a hoax.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 00:12 (twenty years ago)


my god, ive never been more intrigued on ILM.

SO, youve heard the songs? but you have no copy of them?

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 00:41 (twenty years ago)

http://wfmu.org/onthedownload.php/0501

you can find "We will retake saigon" there.

so so so so interesting, please dont let this thread die.

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 01:16 (twenty years ago)

"The commies have to burn. The commies have to learn. We will, we will, we will retake Saigon"

fucking hell. Though I have to admit liking the melodies to the songs, even if I don't like the lyrics.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 04:21 (twenty years ago)


whoa:

http://www.dartmouth82.org/index.php?r=11

jergins (jergins), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 05:54 (twenty years ago)

I first heard "We Will Retake Saigon" over six months ago. although yes, it was on WFMU. It's an astonishingly good song. I suspect that Buddy was a character of Bill Tate's, but that like Seth Putnam of A.C. actually turning into a drunken racist scumbag, the line got too thin 'cause the music was too good.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 08:15 (twenty years ago)

It honestly never crossed my mind until now that it might have been a hoax, partly because it is so believable that - students being students and 1981 being 1981 - the guy existed and did what he did. I expect there were (less talented) analogues all over the place actually.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 14:16 (twenty years ago)


i really really want this full concert

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

i'd agree with both tom and colin -- the contrarian impulse of a student, if the story is to be believed, who already had psychological problems who created a character that was probably a manifestation of those same problems. then again, it is all speculation pulled out of the proverbial ass. Buddy Holocaust's song work because of the friction between the lyrics and music (Ochs is a pretty good comparison) which creates an extreme dischord. hoax or not, excellent.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 15:45 (twenty years ago)

Aargh! Have none of you people ever heard of the Frogs? In a WHOLE CONFERENCE about masquerades, masks, putting on a face to sing, etc., does it not make sense that somebody might think that a GROSS CARICATURE of politics not one's own or even vaguely one's own might make for an interesting or grimly FUNNY persona to sing from, especially since America doesn't have a tradition of ultrarightist songs the way it has a tradition of ultraleftist songs?

Douglas (Douglas), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 15:48 (twenty years ago)

That's why I namechecked Anal Cunt, Douglas!!!

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 15:52 (twenty years ago)

Yeah I think Brian's not asking "was he serious?", but "did he in fact exist?"

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 15:53 (twenty years ago)

yip. that's why the character thing is mentioned. but even as a mask, the mask to a certain extent is a reflection of a part of an interior world of sorts -- even the Frogs.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:08 (twenty years ago)

also, that's why i mentioned contrarian and the cognitive dissonance of the musical mode loaded with non lefty lyrics.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:10 (twenty years ago)

At this point, I'm residing to think he did exist. Well executed hoaxes exist, and I hold WFMU to high regard to pull a very good hoax on us. But that link above that jergins posted is making me believe that Bill Tate was indeed real...

...which doesn't AUTOMATICALLY prove "Buddy Holocaust" is real. If I were to exercise my conspiracy-theory-or-obsessive-desire-to-debunk-thereof mindset, I could claim that Bill Tate was the host onto which the hoax was attached.

I do find the dynamic of believing this or not itself to be fascinating.

People either FIRMLY BELIEVE it's a hoax, or people just merely accept that it's all real.

No one is FIRMLY BELIEVING it's all real, nor are people merely accepting it is a hoax.. (which gives a little more credence to Buddy Holocaust/Bill-Tate-acting-as being, in fact, real)


donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:11 (twenty years ago)

That's how I understood the question -- not as "was Buddy Holocaust REALLY REALLY REAL?" but as "who invented BH -- some college student, or those wackos at FMU?"

I'm a big fan of ambivilence and not really knowing who the joke's on. I mean, the Wire went from praising the Frogs as gay geniuses to utterly ignoring their existence inside of a couple of months, and I figure that's because they felt they got "tricked" -- but I really do think that the Frogs (and Buddy Holocaust and Anal Cunt and Jim Roche, for Pete's sake) are tapping into some very weird territory for themselves as artists and people. Even though it could all be easily dismissed as a "joke", I'm still left with the impression that these folks are too respectful of their material for it all to be just a put on, man.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:13 (twenty years ago)

Then again... dartmouth82.org is quite a wanky domain name to have to dedicate someone too. You'd figure the actual dartmouth .edu host would have just, well, hosted the page too.

ARRRRRRRRRGH! The two sides of my mind are still battling!

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:14 (twenty years ago)

Douglas.. excellent point. I'm actually now really feeling a Frogs piece was severely relevant and lacking in the conference.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

Not necessarily, Donut -- many school alumni groups exist independently from the schools themselves (often for good reason). (xpost)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:15 (twenty years ago)

xpost EXACTLY.

donut, if you get a copy of the full tape, will you shake it down, please? i would be in your debt

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

I mean, the Frogs literally USED blackface on Racially Yours... as two white guys. Talk about a great potential for discussion regarding this band.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

(And so did Six Finger Satellite.. albeit photo-negatived by Sub Pop to avoid hate mail.. which didn't stop Sub Pop from getting hate mail for signing Wolf Eyes, but anyway..)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:17 (twenty years ago)

which didn't stop Sub Pop from getting hate mail for signing Wolf Eyes


REALLY?

Open your eyes; you can fly! (ex machina), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

(Yeah, heard it straight from the source, but this is better talked about in another thread.. start it if you'd like)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)


im seriously at the point where i will pay for this buddy holocaust CD.

"who invented BH -- some college student, or those wackos at FMU?"

really, this is just beyond interesting. fuck my exam tomorrow.

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:22 (twenty years ago)

I will be contacting folks to see what I can get. It may not be immediate... and at this point, some label just flat out releasing the tape is certainly inevitable. I mean if there can be a gazillion GG Allin CD releases...

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

to be honest i dont think GG Allin really works in comparison to Buddy Holocaust.

jack cole (jackcole), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

1. The less aware you are; the less "in" on the joke the better the satire.
2. It was a great piece, absolutely, despite my being VERY unnerved by the one song in particular. I won't name names, but one of the panelists and moderators for the conference behind me voiced EXTREME distress and dissent towards this song having been played... and I honestly felt good that someone else felt the same way as me.

That person was an idiot.

Mr and bread Circus, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 16:55 (twenty years ago)

> America doesn't have a tradition of ultrarightist songs the way it has a tradition of ultraleftist songs?


Eh? Lee Greenwood, Darryl Worley, Toby Keith, Charlie Daniels Band ... ?

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 17:02 (twenty years ago)

That person was an idiot.

Mr. Bread, were you there at the panel? Would you like to shed light on why that person is an idiot? Because I've seen this person moderate another panel, and give a presentation in the past, and I can attest that this person is NOT an idiot.

Thanks for your great insight, by the way.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

Right right, a true genius. A panel discussing an obviously satirical songwriter, objectively accessing his works... and they were offended when his piece played? How much should you have to dance around it?

Mr and bread Circus, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:37 (twenty years ago)

Right right, a true genius. A panel discussing an obviously satirical songwriter, objectively accessing his works...

How do you know it was obvious?

and they were offended when his piece played? How much should you have to dance around it?

The person was not offended at the presentation. The person was offended at the song in question... specifically the "Drugs Made Me Do This" song.. a song that describes in detail sticking a knife into one's girlfriend, taking out her internals, and eating them. It may be "haha" to some, but I think many people have a right to be offended by a song like that, no matter what the fucking intention of the song was.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:45 (twenty years ago)

But the satire was designed to offend, so for someone to say "OK, I'm offended, now what?" made things a lot more interesting and immediate. It exposed the dynamic of offensive/satirical music, in that a lot of it is about producing an in-group of people who aren't offended (especially in the case of a tape being passed around samizdat style).

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:46 (twenty years ago)

I haven't heard this recording, but it sounds like the kind of thing college students do all the time, on every campus -- what's so weird/amazing about this? It seems kinda standard fare, conceptually -- is it all the execution that makes it interesting?

Hurlothrumbo (hurlothrumbo), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

Well, if we assume the satire was designed to offend, that is, then sure the dynamic is interesting. But just to close up my point against Mr. Bread: I don't think there's anything "idiotic" about being offended by it. That's all.

Anyway...

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:49 (twenty years ago)

Hurlo, I have heard a lot of those types of college student type satires as well. This thing is definitely of its own class -- mainly because we know so little about the person, and there seems to be an implicit assumption that Bill Tate was a loner, which could VERY WELL be false!

I wouldn't have started a thread about Buddy Holocaust if he was just a more controversial Wally Pleasant.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:52 (twenty years ago)

Also, Hurlo, many college type satirists in the folk tradition don't usually off themselves a year or so later.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:53 (twenty years ago)

Hurlo, I think that it's the quality of the singing and the strength of the melodies that makes Buddy Holocaust worth discussing, yes. I would agree that the rest of the stuff is hardly unique.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:56 (twenty years ago)

But you know very little about the person because, according to what's posted above, he just did this once, right? Like, it was a goofy cynical college gag, and he taped it and sent it around. Is there something mysterious about it that I'm not getting?

I'm totally not trying to be contentious about this, by the way, I just feel like I'm missing something.


xpost: yeah, but unfortunately many college kids do kill themselves.

Hurlothrumbo (hurlothrumbo), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:58 (twenty years ago)

the Frogs were the biggest bunch of dicks I ever met.

Isn't there a lot of stuff like this way way underground, like I've seen weird right wing, quasi-offensive country tapes by artists I've never heard of at weird truckstops and the like...this seems to be getting more attention just cuz of the Dartmouth connection and the fact that it might be satire? Look at stuff like the David Allen Coe dirty/racist records and stuff like that...I don't think Doug's right when he says there's no tradition of right wing type music in America, it just never gets covered.

M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 18:59 (twenty years ago)

OK two things:

I got a personal email from Rob Graff himself (look above) who was in Bill Tate's (would-be) graduating class at Dartmouth confirming the whole thing to be true.

I also got a message from Eric Weisbard himself confirming that Bill Tate/"Buddy Holocaust" is not a hoax. And he also pleaded that he doesn't wish for that tape to circulate just yet, because there are some obviously very delicate details surrounding letting Bill Tate's parents and relatives know about this before anything is "officially" distributed, and I think Eric makes an extremely cogent point.

So there you have it.

I apologize to the great folks at WFMU for accusing them and anyone else possibly involved of doing a "hoax" in this manner, although it was really meant as an odd form of compliment, since -- HAD this been a hoax -- it would have been an exemplary execution of one, and I would believe the folks at WFMU would be succinct and smooth enough to do it.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:21 (twenty years ago)

Of course, this doesn't leave the relevant questions answered.. and they probably never will be answered... perhaps for the best.

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

To my EXTREME shock, KEXP has the "Drugs Made Me Do This" song in its archives. It was played on Wednesday, April 13th, around 1pm. Go to http://www.kexp.org and navigate from there.

(I say "EXTREME shock" because KEXP, to me, seems like a station that's too afraid to even play the A-Frames without isolating listeners, much less a very graphicly violent obscurity)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

I guess there's no official title but the song has an alternate title "Forced To Kill On PCP"

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

wow

just wow.

JD from CDepot, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 21:03 (twenty years ago)

I just looked 'Tate' up in our alumni directory, and I don't see anyone at all who matches that name... unless, did he kill himself before graduating? The date on that dartmouth82.org page seems to indicate so, though I'm not sure why that would cause him to be removed.

i am nervous (cochere), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

Well, maybe that's why dartmouth82.org exists? I wish I could recall from the presentation, but I think Tate dropped out of Dartmouth and moved to L.A. to ship his music to record labels (and, for obvious reasons, didn't get anywhere... if this was the reason for the car crash suicide, I have no idea.). In any case, perhaps his being a student is being acknowledged in that specific Dartmouth '82 page whereas it can't be acknowledged in the official page(?)

donut debonair (donut), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 22:24 (twenty years ago)

I was actually working up a paper for EMP on the topic "Are the Frogs racist?", based on conversations I had with them a while back (and their catalog, obv.) Now I wish I had followed through with it. Very complex band. Suffice it to say I don't think their earlier material was 'merely' intended to shock, but framing it as satire isn't entirely adequate either.

j. niimi (litotesia), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 01:07 (twenty years ago)

Could someone explain to me why the Frogs are considered this interesting? I really like them (I saw them play with the Moldy Peaches and I was one of the few people who stayed til the end of their set--the previously-full room had almost emptied out by this point) but I don't think they're particularly transgressive comic geniuses. They have a knack for offensive comedy, but it doesn't strike me as anything special.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:09 (twenty years ago)

I can't confess to being a Frogs fanatic myself, but while It's Only Right And Natural might be the only thing that a slim majority of Frogs fan own (the other being My Daughter The Broad, and this seems to be a weirdly regional phenomenon.. L.A. exemplifying the former, Seattle exemplifying the latter, for example), The Frogs have been around since the early 80s and have been playing live on and off since. There are many, MANY layers to the Frogs' onion skin than you might think.. trust me. And there is definitely a sense of mystery, hoax vs. realism, and blackface (literally on one album) about them.

donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 20:15 (twenty years ago)

Is there a good place to go to get a feel for this, aside from listening to the albums, which, as I've said, haven't particularly conveyed this very well, at least to me? My main point of entry was My Daughter the Broad, but I've sampled fairly broadly.

I've never met the Frogs, but I have talked to Seth Putnam, and he's very nice.

Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 21:25 (twenty years ago)

The one time I saw the Frogs was in Seattle about a couple of years ago (and Ned was there!). It was a completely brilliant trainwreck of a show, which is usually par for the course for most Frogs shows, but this one was of a special caliber. The drummer was REALLY abusive to hecklers in the audience for about 15 minutes, which was what basically ended the show.. although we weren't quite sure it was the end of the show... or something like that.

I've never been on the same bill as them as a band member, and I did get a vibe from both of them, off stage, that was really quite "distant", for lack of a better term, so I can understand getting the "asshole" vibe if I were to be backstage with them. But I did see both of them being nice and apologizing for the stage act after the live show. So, different strokes, different shows, different folks, etc.

Although the really creepy guy who came on stage to show us his "thing" during the set never got an apology. The drummer reacted horrificly to him (and "it") telling the guy "What the fuck is that? Looks like one of those things you see at the state fair."

Anyway, I guess this should go on the Frogs thread instead. Apologies for the digression.

donut debonair (donut), Wednesday, 20 April 2005 22:07 (twenty years ago)

I can't go see the Frogs anymore when they play NYC. Evan Dando insists on standing in the front and staring until he finally invites himself on stage to take over. I ain't throwing away $8-10 on that.

Brian Turner (btwfmu), Thursday, 21 April 2005 01:40 (twenty years ago)

the frogs' first three albums are all great in very different ways. the debut is a bizarro, parallel-world studio pop album with lyrics that don't sound transgressive so much as they just sound wrong for a studio pop album. it's only right and natural is, besides everything else it tries really hard to be, a pretty great lo-fi pop album. and my daughter the broad sounds like early ween with less taste. i remember hearing that that one was almost entirely improvised, which makes it, more than anything else, a rather impressive display of on-the-fly songwriting. i haven't liked anything else i've heard by them, including the awful racially yours, but for those first three albums they really had something unique going.

i saw at cbgb circa my daughter the broad and they sounded like a grunge band gone bad, which i mean i the good sense. they were loud, unhinged, weird and loaded with hooks. a couple years later i saw them opening for guided by voices and they were standoffish and boring and it occurred to me there was no reason whatsoever to see them more than once, but i did love that once.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Thursday, 21 April 2005 02:51 (twenty years ago)

I can't go see the Frogs anymore when they play NYC. Evan Dando insists on standing in the front and staring until he finally invites himself on stage to take over. I ain't throwing away $8-10 on that.

Goddamn. There's only one way to rectify this situation.

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:16 (twenty years ago)

Get Dando on the horse again?

The one time I saw the Frogs was in Seattle about a couple of years ago (and Ned was there!).

The weird fucking thing was I had seen them *twice* that week some thousand miles apart, as some days previously they ended up unexpectedly on a bill in between the Brian Jonestown Massacre and the Lovetones. A Frogs show followed by Anton in mega rant mode *as well as* the best version of BJM backing him yet = a night to remember.

The Frogs definitely react with their audience as things happen -- the San Diego show was much more 'focused,' in a relative sense, than the bizarro world of the Seattle show, which was also the final one of the tour. The audience in Seattle was also much more confrontational.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:34 (twenty years ago)

I guess what I find interesting about the Frogs as songwriters is that they refuse to validate your politics no matter what your politics are. (I've also seen them play a couple of really astonishing shows, although every five years or so is probably enough for me.)

I suspect this is also true of Buddy Holocaust; having only heard the stuff Eric W. played--well, who's the intended sympathetic audience for e.g. "Another Kent State" (in the same way that there could be an intended sympathetic audience for, say, "I Ain't Marching Anymore")--someone who saw Kent State as not horrible, not even unfortunate-but-necessary, but as a good thing? Could there even be such an audience? To imagine a sympathetic audience for that song, do you have to somehow dehumanize them?

Douglas (Douglas), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:53 (twenty years ago)

Could there even be such an audience? To imagine a sympathetic audience for that song, do you have to somehow dehumanize them?

No, I could imagine it. I don't WANT to imagine it but I could, all too easily, and without dehumanizing.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 03:55 (twenty years ago)

"To imagine a sympathetic audience for that song, do you have to somehow dehumanize them?"

That's the question of the thread, along with this one: To create a character that can sing that song sympathetically/convincingly, do you have to somehoe dehumanize yourself?

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 21 April 2005 07:29 (twenty years ago)

This thread is going on as if people have heard the music being discussed. If you have it, please upload it somewhere. High on PCP isn't that good, but We Will Retake Saigon is great. Please share.

Chris H. (chrisherbert), Thursday, 21 April 2005 07:45 (twenty years ago)

I agree with your opinion about their quality, but am also moved somehow by the increasingly less amused and more disturbed audience in the background on High on PCP, and I think that fits in well with what Douglas has asked.

I don't have any Budd Holocaust files, but Jim Roche, whom I name-dropped, is obscure enough that folks should look here: http://www.ubu.com/sound/roche.html

"Bubble Blower" and "Fight It Out" are the two to listen to if you only listen to two.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Thursday, 21 April 2005 07:54 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
http://www.wfmu.org/playlists/shows/13763

Scroll down a bit. You'll have to listen to those two songs on Real Player, which is gross, but you can hear it.

I really liked "Forced to Kill on PCP."

Oh, and someone already linked to "We'll Re-Take Saigon" on WFMU's "On the Download" column.

Laurie (anonymouse), Monday, 4 July 2005 05:30 (twenty years ago)

two months pass...
Found this through a google search:
http://www.dartmouth.org/classes/82/old_site/dec98.html

"Any French Hall missive would not be complete without mentioing the late Bill Tate, our resident genius, who wrote a massive study of Nietzsche, spent nine successive terms "on", then tragically committed suicide at the age of 21 in the fall of 1981. I always think of Bill on his birthday (Sept. 3). He is buried in Laurel, Iowa."

I apologize if it was already posted.

kjf4, Friday, 16 September 2005 03:32 (twenty years ago)

one month passes...
For those who are interested -- Setlist (6/29/81): Another Kent State/We will retake Saigon/We have our reasons/Chip and Claire/Declared war on love/Guess I lost my head/Hiroshima/Fight, kill, die, love/Good to see you again/These morons have to go/And I haven't decided/ El Salvador/Judy.

Visitor, Wednesday, 9 November 2005 04:37 (twenty years ago)

since this thread got revived, let me just xpost to kjf4 and say that spending 'nine successive terms on' means that he spent 2 years and 3 months in a row taking classes

not a modest feat

nervous (cochere), Wednesday, 9 November 2005 06:42 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.