Afterthoughts of the EMP Pop Conference 2005, Go!

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm starting this thread as a way for people who attended the conference to go through and list the panels and pieces they feel they got the most out of (or feel they got the least out of, even)

I won't be able to even start such a list until tonight, but I want to give the folks who aren't chained to a workstation right now to vent their thoughts on specific pieces, why they resonated, or why they didn't resonate..

...or allow folks to summarize their entire experience.. and to allow those who didn't attend to ask questions of those who did.

..or some or all of the above!

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:10 (twenty years ago)

So did Tom like USE or what? ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:14 (twenty years ago)


dave thomas, surveying the scene


free t-shirts! 'have you got an xtra large?'

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:22 (twenty years ago)

I made the grave mistake of NOT starting such a thread after last year's conference, and as a result, after a few days, all the great stuff my brain was saturated with just evaporated, and I moved on... which I felt very guilty about for the curious who wanted to attend last year. I don't want to repeat that. I want to dwell on this stuff, because -- especially this year -- there has been expression of frustration and emotion that was not present last year, surely very tied to the theme of this year's conference as opposed to the more poignant "Magic moments" theme of last year, which didn't invite as much discourse and, dare I say, conflict that this year's conference did.

I'm emphasizing the panel on How To Rock Like A Black Feminist Rock Critic. This (and the Black Mass panel, which I will get to later in its own thread, specifically one piece in it) were definitely wrought with a combination of either emotion, frustration, fright, and/or humor.. They are the ones that "stood out" for me this year because while there have been so many great panels, these left a lot of really complex questions unanswered, and hence, leave me wanting to try to answer them as much as possible.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:29 (twenty years ago)

So did Tom like USE or what? ;-)

To be slightly serious, I think this belongs on another thread.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:30 (twenty years ago)

My thoughts-as-they-occurred are at home, so I'll have to dig them up later -- but I wanted to say for the record that I was *horrified* by Alexandra Richmond's piece on the Juggalos. Her presentation can be summarized as: "I think ICP is the worst band in the world, and I wanted to know what on earth would make anyone a fan, so I emailed a couple fans, but they wouldn't reply to me, so I just restated how bad the band is and lobbed a few facile putdowns. Oh, and I didn't want to talk to any intelligent fans, because they're obviously not representative." Her lack of engagement was so painful on so many levels, I couldn't believe it had actually transpired. There are many ways to enter and study a community -- and she opted for none of them.

On the other hand, Michaelangelo's piece on "Apache" was wonderfully well-written and educative (Matos is also a fine extemporaneous speaker); the convo with him, Geeta, Jess, Tom, and J Smooth was fascinating; Douglas Wolk's Coke jingle history was marvelous; and it should not go without saying that Eric Weisbard and Ann Powers are two of the nicest people one will ever encounter.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:31 (twenty years ago)

I didn't see the Juggalo piece but Tom E. did, and I'll speak for him for the time being since he's currently starting his journey into the air travel/jumping-ahead-8-hours vortex as we speak.

Tom pretty much agreed with you, Joseph (again, I will let Tom speak for himself once he arrives back in London and is settled.). Tom and I, on our walk balk to our lodgings/home respectively last night, talked about the piece. He was horrified by the presenter as well, but he mentioned still getting something out of it.. namely, the presenter's horror of the Juggalos pretty much clearly exemplified the POINT of the existence of the Juggalos. I then facetiously brought up whether the presenter was presenting this "Oh, this is HORRIBLE!" thing as a calculate facade or not.

(This very last thought will segue into the Buddy Holocaust thread I will start tonight)

(and Joseph, I'm sorry I never got to see you... I hope we get to meet in the future.. but it seems, by not meeting, we apparently attended each other's complement of panels, which is great for this thread.)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:39 (twenty years ago)

Yes, Eric and Ann are god and goddess respectively.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:40 (twenty years ago)

the convo with him, Geeta, Jess, Tom, and J Smooth was fascinating

I'd like to know more about this. What sorts of things were addressed? Last year's CMJ panel on "the future of online journalism" basically just talked about mp3 blogs the whole time -- which was fine and interesting (and gave Matthew Perpetua and Mark Willett a nice forum) -- but I'd hoped for something broader.

jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:41 (twenty years ago)

I was disappointed by two of the papers on the panel I was on - the abovementioned ICP one, which was indeed shallow and dismissive (and wound up almost making me buy two ICP discs I spotted in the used bin at Easy Street Records later that afternoon) and the one by Amy Phillips, which relied way too much on inaudible sound files of interview ramblings and just never seemed to get to a point. The paper on B-boy anthems was great, though, and not just because the deliverer (Joe Schloss) danced while delivering it.

Other papers I liked: one on Steely Dan by Paul Anderson (though it got a little theory-heavy), one on Albert Ayler by T.R. Johnson, one on Lester Young and the "cool mask" by Joel Dinerstein, and one on Merle Haggard by Cotten Seiler (all of these but the Steely Dan one were part of the same panel). In order to catch the Steely Dan talk, I had to be late for the Black Feminist Rock Critic panel, but I caught the last of Kandia Crazy Horse and wished I'd been able to engage her one-on-one afterward, and caught Laina Dawes talking about being a black female metalhead. I would have preferred a more formal presentation from her, but it was still very interesting and she seems cool and I definitely don't feel like the I'll-go-to-yours-if-you-come-to-mine deal I made with her in advance was in any way a one-sided favor to either of us.

Folks I had a good time talking to one-on-one: Dave Queen, Allen Lowe, Matos, Jess, Tom Ewing, donut, T.R. Johnson, Joel Dinerstein, Geeta, and surely some folks I'm forgetting.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:42 (twenty years ago)

Oh my God, I wish I'd gone now because I would have gone to the Juggalo conference and PWNED the presenter.

The Ghost of Dan "H-Bomb" Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:43 (twenty years ago)

The concept of you PWNING the presenter was brought up in our convo last night, Dang!

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:46 (twenty years ago)

Hahah, nice.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:47 (twenty years ago)

The reactions I'm hearing about the ICP piece are, indeed, truly making me wonder if it was a hoax or not, but I wasn't there, so I can't say.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:50 (twenty years ago)

jaymc, I was at the Blog panel, and it was a lot of fun. It seemed to be the complement of the mp3 blog panel you seem to be talking about, actually (although the mp3 issue was brought up at the very end)

It wasn't a theory-drenched panel by any means.. I think the intent (and Matos, as moderator of the panel, can correct me if I'm wrong) was to be a more informal, round-table discussion of a sample of bloggers.

One of the things i remember most was Geeta explaining -- in the context of the relative dearth of females in the dedicated music "blogosphere" -- from her science/MIT edu background, that she's seen evidence that guys are more inclined to make "lists of things" than women are... something, as a list-making guy myself, didn't notice.

And of course the "Are all music bloggers the product of lost fathers in our childhood?" revelation which had everybody LOLing.

(to explain, Oliver Wang brought up an interesting comment about how parents might feel about blogs, "why do you do it? how is it going to make you money?", etc. which led Matos to ask the panel "What does your mother think of your blog?", to which everyone was able to actually answer. Someone in the audience then asked "What does your father think of your blog?", and -- except for Geeta and Tom -- everyone else didn't ever happen to know their true father after their single digit years.)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 19:59 (twenty years ago)

It wasn't a hoax; she was clearly stonewalled in her attempts at getting inside the subculture, but wasn't able to go over those walls. She later told me that the only people who got back in touch with her via email were nice kids from overseas, where she wanted to talk to and hang out with local kids and/or people from similar places (i.e. American suburbs) who were into ICP. Too bad, because I was really hoping she could provide some insight on it. I did hang out w/her some later, and she's pretty nice. But as I told her, she seemed bitter about the experience, and it came across.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:02 (twenty years ago)

She should have emailed me!!! Even though I haven't bought an ICP album in what, six years?

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:05 (twenty years ago)

YOU LIKED ICP!???!?!!!?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:17 (twenty years ago)

I don't think you are a particularly representative juggalo either, Dan.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:20 (twenty years ago)

i think he's TOTALLY representative!

j blount (papa la bas), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:22 (twenty years ago)

j blount, those pics just made my day

ken taylrr (ken taylrr), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:23 (twenty years ago)

"i think he's TOTALLY representative!"

Did Dan threaten Motorbooty Magazine and not tell us about it?

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

Hahahaha MM, didn't we have this conversation in 2002?

Ringmaster and Riddle Box are fantastic albums and the "Tunnel of Love" EP is great, too. Everything else is patchy, although there are moments of greatness on Bizarr/Bizaar and The Great Milenko and "Redneck Hoe" has possibly the greatest hook ever ("Bitch, you's a hoe/And hoe, you's a bitch/Everybody knows/That you're a funky funky bitch").

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:26 (twenty years ago)

haha i love the turn this has taken

the juggalo thing was disappointing to me because it probably should have been scrapped when she couldnt actually "walk with the juggalos". perhaps the title promised too much.

strng hlkngtn, Monday, 18 April 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)

She also perhaps should not have pronounced it "jugga-LOOS" throughout.

Joseph McCombs (Joseph McCombs), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

TEH JUGGALOS NEED A JANE GOODALL! WHERE'S WWF?

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 20:56 (twenty years ago)

i actually have a fair bit of experience walking with the juggalos, or at least selling records to them. i wanted to ask her a question about the juggalo canon, since she said they hate everyone but nwa, because the juggalos who shop at my store DO buy a lot of rap, but a very select group.

strng hlkngtn, Monday, 18 April 2005 20:58 (twenty years ago)

Once again, if anyone wants to talk more about Sublette's New Orleans presentation or hears of it being reprinted somewhere, I'm interested.

Jordan (Jordan), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:01 (twenty years ago)

Sublette didn't talk to any Juggalos = IT IS NOT WORTHY

Ned Raggett (Ned), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:09 (twenty years ago)

or walk with

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:26 (twenty years ago)

To bring up a point that Drew made in the previous thread, while I certainly was a divide between the presenters coming from a very academic/theoretic angle and those who were coming from "within the art itself" angle, I really enjoyed hearing both sides of it, myself being more closer to the "within the art" side than the academia side. Of course, I'm not arguing against Drew.. just amending to his observations.

The one piece that absolutely FLOORED me was probably the most academic one of them all -- Peter Mercer-Taylor's piece on the breakdown (and I mean BREAKDOWN -- he had an extremely detailed hand-out containing outlines, diagrams, you name it!) of Cradle Of Filth's song "From The Cradle To Enslave". I was grinning non-stop throughout the piece because I rarely get to hear this genre examined in such a manner. The most academic presentation of them all rocked my ass off -- literally. I felt rectified. (NO PUN INTENDED!)

And yeah I was the guy who made the comment afterwards: "Why was everyone chuckling? If this were a Black Sabbath or Korn or Misfits or Venom song, no one would be chuckling, and those bands aren't any more worthy of being taken seriously in this context, IMHO."

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:32 (twenty years ago)

("while I certainly agree there was..." ... sorry)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:33 (twenty years ago)

choice Sublette quotes, probably not exact but they'll give you the idea:

quoting the Black Commentator blog: "'Black Americans do not need European models of fascism to understand the threat.'" (this is re: Bush's 2004 reelection)

"Slavery is a murderous business, but even compared to the rest of the West, American slavery was abhorrent."

at one point he showed a street sign crossing from N.O.: the names were RACE and RELIGIOUS

"Lots of murders means lots of work for brass bands at funerals."

In the 1800s, N.O. was the U.S. capital of sex slavery (he talked extensively about how slaves were bred for specific purposes of sex slavery, both male and female; the figures he cited were staggering--something like an increase from a quarter-million to four million over a certain number of years, like 50 or so). Slaves were primarily a cash crop: "We could just call it the slave-breeding industry."

"Why am I looking at slavery so much here? Because in New Orleans it's right in your face."

He discussed the book Mandingo at length. The author was on the list of writers Cyril (I think) Neville (or whomever the youngest of the Neville Brothers is) mentioned as people he read to learn about black history in the Neville Brothers' oral autobiography. Mandingo was--in one of the abolute greatest lines of the entire Conference--"A turd on the front door of Eisenhower's America" that sold five million copies. "One of the kinkiest books I've ever read," said Sublette, who went on to note that it is, in fact, a meticulously researched book that is also a total "potboiler."

He talked about how the Indian tribes in N.O. parades cannot be pinned down, origins-wise.

Most haunting part of the presentation: Sublette is a fast, loud, authoritative speaker with a pronounced and quite engaging twang. (He spoke about his childhood in Louisiana, and having to play "Slave Auction" in class at age nine, quoting self-written dialogue from a classmate playing the auctioneer: "I hate to break up families, but I must do my job." He's been living in N.O. for a year, which inspired the presentation, and I think he spent a good amount of time in Texas as well.) Three-quarters into his talk, he spoke about hearing the sound of one of the tribes coming up the street: "Congo . . . Congo Nation," he sang, softly. It was like someone had broken the air in the room apart, and you could hear a pin drop in the gap between the two "Congo"s.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:41 (twenty years ago)


I already raved about my faves on the other thread but now that I think of it some extra points . . .

Yes, me too, I really loved that Mendellsohn scholar that gave the Cradle of Filth talk- he ruled, and so did his handout.

I loved how the old blues and jazz geezers with beards would bust each other's chops about facts and historical "firsts" during Q+A time, it gave that part of the talks a certain treacherous feeling.

I loved Judith Halberstam's discussion of the concept of "temporal drag" in relation to queer cover songs.

Ned Sublette truly did kick a lot of ass it must be said

but so did that Morissey paper about his "artful evasions", and the Morrissey Q+A time got really confessional and weepy from some quarters which was fun and awkward


the talk about, like, how like Sun Ra was like this, like, totally far out guy into drones dood and like how, like free folk is just like Aleister Crowley dood who was like this really freaky old guy from like 1903 and stuff and like weed helped me hear Animal Collective this whole new way man etc. made me kinda cranky . . . but perhaps I'm not the intended audience, to be fair it seemed to be a survey for the uninitiated and I think we were all hitting conference fatigue at that point

aside from technological burps and gaps as people struggled with recalcitrant PowerPoint presentations it was all pretty much
totally fun and rad

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:43 (twenty years ago)

that guy Drew mentions going on about Animal Collective et al--dude was completely full of shit, but completely convincing, too. I understood why people hated his presentation, but that was literally the first time anyone has ever talked about that stuff in a way that made me understand its appeal, even if on the basis of that understanding I think it's even more full of shit than ever.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:49 (twenty years ago)

"dood" in print:
http://www.dustedmagazine.com/features/257

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:50 (twenty years ago)

my biggest regret: I didn't have my shit together enough to play any of the songs I was talking about, or show that batshit bonkers "Apache" video I filched from Nate Patrin's website all those months ago. (Douglas showed it to folks on his laptop afterward, so that was cool.)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:51 (twenty years ago)

the talk about, like, how like Sun Ra was like this, like, totally far out guy into drones dood and like how, like free folk is just like Aleister Crowley dood who was like this really freaky old guy from like 1903 and stuff and like weed helped me hear Animal Collective this whole new way man etc. made me kinda cranky . . . but perhaps I'm not the intended audience, to be fair it seemed to be a survey for the uninitiated and I think we were all hitting conference fatigue at that point

Heh heh, I think this exemplifies the "within the art" angle to the highest degree, for better or worse.

I actually really appreciated the execution of his presentation, because I think he was trying to make the presentation itself analagous to the music itself he was describing. Busy, out of sync, then in sync, then out of sync, again, background music, long quotes/rants appearing and disappearing, "like, DOOD" enthusiasm. It was a fun presentation overall.

However it didn't really endear me to the bands he was talking about per se, but I think that's because of my specific background. I've played in many improv noise-rock bands for the past couple of decades, and I've never cared much for "magick", the occult, "mystery", or did any drugs other than have the occasional beer or girlie drink... and after performances I've done with friends, I'd have people come up to me saying "dude, you totally, like, blew my mind.".. However, I can appreciate that this would have been interesting and informative to people who never heard of No Neck Blues Band, SUNN 0)))), Sun Ra, Sun City Girls, etc., so I have to give J. Farrar credit here.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:53 (twenty years ago)

That said, I am a big fan of Sun City Girls, Amon Düül, etc. but I didn't need the piece to convince me.. that's all.

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

I guess for me the issue was that he started by drawing this hardcore line in the sand between Devendra and Newsom and the REAL free folk undaground that ain't no pop crap etc. . . . and then snuck Animal Collective in the side door- which just seems really specious and inconsistent to me. I mean if he only likes Avarus and No Neck because of group improv, free floating jams etc. fair enough, but to come on so strong about how what he loves is the only real authentic thing and everything else sucks, while also praising what he praises in part because it draws on or unifies lots of different genres- seems to give the game away as one inch deep, exclusive / snobby, and just not well thought out. It was also painful to me to hear him mangle Gnosticism with Erik Davis sitting right there next to him a few feet away. But it is true that he was certainly enthusiastic, and if it does make people check out No Neck then that's cool by me.

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:55 (twenty years ago)

Julianne Shepherd's paper on Courtney Love was ultra-solid and had loads of great lines: After quoting C.L. to the effect that the fantasy image on the cover of America's Sweetheart didn't work at all, J.S. surmised it was because, "Like most fantasies, its realization would really freak us out." She also called the kind of white-male-rock-star applause for the same kind of absentee parenting Courtney did while on drugs "a Kerouackian wet dream" and called AS "Brilliant, and so naked it was nearly unlistenable." (Even if you don't like the album--I do--she's got a point.) She also referred to Love's persona on the record as "Courtney in Courtney-face," while "I'll Do Anything," built on the "Smells Like Teen Spirit" chords, was "Courtney in Kurt-face." But I missed the Q&A afterward, where the shit apparently really went down.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 21:58 (twenty years ago)

xpost to Drew.. YES! That and the Polyphonic Spree were on Farrar's dismissal list... however, again to give Farrar the benefit of the doubt, this may have been inserted more for rhetorical/comedic value rather than genuine distrust of Newsom, Spree, etc.

(Matos, thank you for the C.L. and Sublette)

donut debonair (donut), Monday, 18 April 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

btw, when I say "convincing" I mean he convinced me of his passion for the stuff, and that his manner of presentation gave me the feeling he was trying to, not that I actually agreed with him afterward.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 22:02 (twenty years ago)

btw, I did take pretty extensive notes on almost everything I saw, so you'll probably get more over time, though I really want to put it all on my blog. (where, btw, I just posted my "Apache" paper: http://m-matos.blogspot.com/2005/04/notes-on-emp-to-follow-probably-later.html

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 22:03 (twenty years ago)

)

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Monday, 18 April 2005 22:04 (twenty years ago)

OK...I'm back. One quick comment -- I say the best thing I saw was Lavinia Greenlaw's "Dressing Against: On Punk Rock and Not Being a Girl." A simple memoir of a British girl going from disco dolly to punk to post-punker, but the way she read it, with her voice curling at the end of every phrase with all this regret and residual desire, just blew me away.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 01:54 (twenty years ago)

haha okay so did i like miss all the good panels or what?

strng hlkngtn, Tuesday, 19 April 2005 03:17 (twenty years ago)

what did you see, strongo?

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 06:00 (twenty years ago)

I really wish I'd seen the Cradle of Filth panel. Damnation And A Day is pretty much exactly what a band should do when a major label hands them a big sack of money - the same kind of music they've been making all along, only now with an orchestra and a choir.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 10:17 (twenty years ago)

Some expanded thoughts.

pdf (Phil Freeman), Tuesday, 19 April 2005 12:32 (twenty years ago)

http://photos5.flickr.com/10150012_544e87198e.jpg

It's like, University Challenge, Family Feud, WHAT?

"Toxteth O' Grady..."

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

haha and jess covering his face!

jaymc (jaymc), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:47 (twenty years ago)

Also, far too many empty seats. :-(

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:48 (twenty years ago)

Turn-out was initially a little disappointing but the seats filled up after a while.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:49 (twenty years ago)

Oh good. :-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 22:50 (twenty years ago)

So far nobody's said anything about it, but the very last presentation I saw, Erik Davis' examination of Jimmy Page and the occult was spell-binding, covering Page-as-Studio-Magus/hack, why Led Zeppelin weren't rockist, Memphis Minnie's songwriting credit on "Levee", why Page's obeisance to the occult resulted in inconsistent live performances, backwards-masking as Christian turntablism, "Stairway to Heaven," on and on...quite amazing considering I've been rolling my eyes at Davis' writings for years.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:00 (twenty years ago)

I wonder what the North person means by "a moderator who was anything but"--that I'm hyper, maybe?

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:19 (twenty years ago)

I was trying to figure that out. You dominator of the dialectic.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:20 (twenty years ago)

maybe he thought you were drawing naked lady pictures there.

christ, i just need to shave my head already.

strng hlkngtn, Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:25 (twenty years ago)

I hate to say it, but I wish a better picture was taken. This looks like the aftermath of someone having just vomited in the audience, and Tom having to tell everyone politely to just let things be and move on, while Jess is trying to not look or think about it, and everyone else on the panel pretending nothing happened.

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:34 (twenty years ago)

Either that, or someone had just used the word "rockist" in a question to the panel... same thing.

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:36 (twenty years ago)

http://photos5.flickr.com/10150012_544e87198e.jpg

"Look, it's quite alright, everyone. The R-word does get dragged out every now and then, but in these times, we just must collect ourselves and move on, right? The offending gentlemen has been taken care of... now then."

donut debonair (donut), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:39 (twenty years ago)

Matos: "tic...tac...toe!"

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:42 (twenty years ago)

strongo, are your initials j h?

Drew Daniel (Drew Daniel), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

yes, it's jessica

miccio (miccio), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:43 (twenty years ago)

i dont shave my armpits either

strng hlkngtn, Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:49 (twenty years ago)

The R-word does get dragged out every now and then

But I thought people liked me. *cries*

Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 April 2005 23:52 (twenty years ago)

Was K. Sanneh there? In years past the N.Y. Times covered the event, but I haven't seen any such newspaper reviews this time.

Am I reading too much into Christgau's piece to think there might not be money available to do this next year? Or maybe they've got to try to get Boeing to kick in even more bucks?

steve-k, Friday, 22 April 2005 12:29 (twenty years ago)

J Niimi posted EMPics @ his bloggo, too - I had the address in an e-mail, but I don't have the e-mail on me.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 22 April 2005 12:43 (twenty years ago)

Daphne Carr's got lots of comments on her blog, and as noted above, is making her paper available if you e-mail her

http://themusicissue.blogspot.com/

steve-k, Friday, 22 April 2005 14:41 (twenty years ago)

"I've got a Porche."

The Sensational Sulk (sexyDancer), Friday, 22 April 2005 14:56 (twenty years ago)

Hahah.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 22 April 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

http://home.uchicago.edu/~jniimi/

i'm looking more like my dad every year

strng hlkngtn, Friday, 22 April 2005 15:30 (twenty years ago)

Is it just me or does SFJ sorta look like Billy Bob Thornton circa Hearts Afire?

Candicissima (candicissima), Friday, 22 April 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

Sasha looks exactly like an old lit professor of mine.

Alex in SF (Alex in SF), Friday, 22 April 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

Actually, Jess, you look TERRIFYINGLY like my younger brother in that picture.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 22 April 2005 16:16 (twenty years ago)

the beard looks good!

miccio (miccio), Friday, 22 April 2005 16:53 (twenty years ago)

I think the last word ANYONE wants to hear in regards to their appearance (regardless of context) is "terrifyingly"!

&, yeah, props on the beard(s) all around - I wish I could grow one, but I fear I'd make like a dying lawn more than a hirsute stud.

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:00 (twenty years ago)

I want to say how really and truly proud of ILM I am for turning discussion away from such "serious" matters as MP3 blogs to really important topics like how nice Jess's facial hair looks. Fantastic.

It is very well done actually. Mine end up all scratchy and I just shave em off, Friday, 22 April 2005 17:08 (twenty years ago)

NEW BEARD AMERICA

Pickled Pickslide, Friday, 22 April 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Beards: The Enemy of Good Music?

Pickled Pickslide, Friday, 22 April 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

"I think the last word ANYONE wants to hear in regards to their appearance (regardless of context) is "terrifyingly"!"

Clearly. Then again, you don't know my brother.

Colin Meeder (Mert), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

Clearly!

David R. (popshots75`), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:47 (twenty years ago)

really, it's just laziness on my part

strng hlkngtn, Friday, 22 April 2005 17:48 (twenty years ago)

The whole U GOT THE LOOK panel was awesome... This was the first of the panels on Friday morning. A great way to kick things off.

Jason King, Tim Lawrence, Sharon Mesmer, and *especially* Steve Waksmen were great.

Waksmen did a piece on Alice Cooper's influence on stage/camp in a rock setting, and did so vary convincingly. I like how he started his piece with Easy Action and its album cover, front and end (puns completely intended), and then ended his piece with the Billion Dollar Babies era, because after that (skipping the contract breaker album Muscle Of Love), it was essentially Cooper out-Coopering himself -- to good degrees, and after, to *cough* not-so-good degrees.

donut debonair (donut), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

The Steve Waksmen presentation synopsis on Alice Cooper ("Is It My Body? Alice Cooper and Glam Performance") is here.

donut debonair (donut), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:53 (twenty years ago)

I want to marry Daphne Carr. She is a music geek's dream girl.

shookout (shookout), Friday, 22 April 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

I'm now trying to grow out my beard to Hasidim-length. Enjoy my cuteness while you can.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Friday, 22 April 2005 19:58 (twenty years ago)

That Hasidic dancehall reggae guy needs some competition Michael. You can then take him on in a freestyle battle at next year's seminar.

steve-k, Friday, 22 April 2005 20:24 (twenty years ago)

I was explaining in the pub tonight re the ILE Fattism thread that I have always felt more prejudice vis a vis my BEARD than my weight, imagine my delight on learning that ALL MALE ROCK CRITICS except Greil Marcus and Xgau* have enormous beards, finally I felt at home etc etc.

*ok and Matos. But he could!

Tom (Groke), Friday, 22 April 2005 21:44 (twenty years ago)

Matos has explored all sorts of facial hair in the last two years.. The Freddie Mercury phase was really interesting, especially.

donut debonair (donut), Friday, 22 April 2005 22:10 (twenty years ago)

haha I went to the barber the night before the Conference started, I actually had a Cesar Rosas-style chin beard for a few weeks there.

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Saturday, 23 April 2005 02:20 (twenty years ago)

wow, first looks at keith harris and dave queen. keep these emp photos coming!!

jaymc (jaymc), Saturday, 23 April 2005 06:27 (twenty years ago)

Don't know if this has been mentioned anywhere, but if you have cable, the EMP conference is currently being shown on the Seattle Channel...

Right now it is Eric Martin Usner - Sounds of Starbucks (time is 6:30pm Pacific)

Garibaldianne (Garibaldianne), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:54 (twenty years ago)

Oops, looks like that is all they are going to show for now.

I work with a person whose husband works for the Seattle Channel and went to the conference and did a bunch of taping, so I know they have some of it on tape...

Garibaldianne (Garibaldianne), Sunday, 24 April 2005 00:57 (twenty years ago)

Of the panels I was at, only the panel w/Usner and maybe the Ann Powers one too had the noticeable presence of film cameras. In fact, I think I may have walked in front of the camera at the Usner one.

Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 24 April 2005 01:09 (twenty years ago)

two weeks pass...
PDFs and external links to a bunch of presentations (mine included) are up at http://www.emplive.org/visit/education/popConf.asp

Matos-Webster Dictionary (M Matos), Friday, 13 May 2005 18:28 (twenty years ago)

PDFs and external links to a bunch of presentations (mine included) are up at http://www.emplive.org/visit/education/popConf.asp

Thank you - my inner sociology student is going to have geekasm reading these!!!

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 14 May 2005 20:36 (twenty years ago)

*A* geekasm, even. Or multiples. We'll see.

Tantrum The Cat (Tantrum The Cat), Saturday, 14 May 2005 20:41 (twenty years ago)

one year passes...
Interview with Ned Sublette. 110,000 words into his new book on New Orleans and the floodwater hit Tulane. Don't worry - he's started over.

blackmail (blackmail.is.my.life), Tuesday, 13 June 2006 22:26 (nineteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.