A Beatles Thread: 25 years of listening to music....

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
....(consciously or sub-), and I've come to the basic realization that there is no greater rock band than The Beatles. This is partly ironic, since they probably the first band I liked anyway.

I've had various phases of obsession from my early days to today -- from the Smashing Pumpkins, Nirvana, CCR, Pink Floyd, the Doors, KISS, Metallica, the Beastie Boys, the Beach Boys, Joy Division, Miles Davis, Cannonball Adderley, Art Tatum, the Clash, Clinic, early Verve, to most recently Talk Talk -- but when I put on "I Am the Walrus" it -- still -- completely blows my mind. Even all the Beatles bootlegs I listen to now and then just present a band with an almost godly knowledge of, simply, what sounds GOOD, and how to play and produce it to sound that way. Just listen to the progression of early "Strawberry Fields Forever" demos on one of the Anthologies....there has never been another band as good as this.

Has anyone else come to this conclusion? I'm particularly interested in the opinions of all the ILM "old-timers" on here whose musical catalog and knowledge (and age!) far FAR outdoes my own....

PB, Monday, 11 July 2005 16:12 (twenty years ago)

Whatever. I hate that the Beatles are thought out as this untouchable thing, the bgeinning and end of pop music as an art form, a band that no other band can come close to, just by theory. It's like people don't even listen to the music.. tHe Beatles have long ago transcended their actual output.. they're this monolithic thing that gets credited for everything, the band that everyone has to aspire to be like, and it pisses me off like nothing else.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:19 (twenty years ago)

As great as the Beatles are/were, they never had a run as hot as the Stones from 68-72. Beggars Banquet, Let It Bleed, Sticky Fingers, Exile On Main Street. Untouchable.

kornrulez6969 (TCBeing), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

edd s hurt to thread!

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:21 (twenty years ago)

They weren't particularly good MCs, some of their beats are OK tho.

Tom (Groke), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

The Beatles were very, very fricking good.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:23 (twenty years ago)

The Beatles were a fine band until they looked like they had picked ye clothing from a past century and changed the shade of the cloth. Ghastly, ye must stay in one's time!

Esteban P. Buttez Esq., Monday, 11 July 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

They weren't particularly good MCs, some of their beats are OK tho.

Oddly, I've heard people geniunely argue that the Beatles created rap. And Punk.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:24 (twenty years ago)

Not to be rude, but is anyone else fucking sick of PB and his Beatles fixation? No offense, i'm sure he's a great guy. But we get it -- YOU LIKE THE BEATLES.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

I've pondered selling my Beatles CDs, but never did. I guess I like them well enough to keep around.

Gear! (Ill Cajun Gunsmith) (Gear!), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:25 (twenty years ago)

The Beatles were very, very fricking good.

Well yes, of course. I can't imagine anyone actually hating their music, I hate what they stand for moreso than anything else.

It's odd that this topic came up, because i've been working on an essay entitled I Hate The Beatles for a few weeks now.

The Brainwasher (Twilight), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:26 (twenty years ago)

It's like people don't even listen to the music..

Right, but the person who started this thread is talking about listening to them, and coming back and listening again after having heard much else.

I think they were very, very great, but that's not to say I like everything they recorded.

I have nothing new to say about them though.

RS LaRue (RSLaRue), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

I've heard they invented rhythm and blues music and cured cancer. Also, that John Lennon invented wit and that Paul McCartney invented freedom.

Haikunym (Haikunym), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

I've heard they invented metal and experimental music, Brainwasher, but obviously I'm glad that they invented those other things too.

(NB in the last year or two I've really got into the Beatles.)

Tom (Groke), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

Oddly, I've heard people geniunely argue that the Beatles created rap. And Punk.

I've heard the latter ("Helter Skelter" also --- evidently -- invented metal to some folks' minds). But how could anyone suggest they created rap?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:27 (twenty years ago)

dude was spittin out rhymes at the top of "sgt pepper's" like run dmc

Gear! (Ill Cajun Gunsmith) (Gear!), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

They discovered Ravi Shankar, too.

RS LaRue (RSLaRue), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:28 (twenty years ago)

Beatles = Classic
People Who Like The Beatles Too Much And Don't Listen To Other Stuff = Dud
Trying to Think Of Something Interesting To Say About The Beatles In This Day And Age = Another Dud

k/l (Ken L), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

Lest one be rude but is one and all rather ill of Alexander in Niue Amsterdam and his Killing Joke fixation? Offence or ill-will is not in my nature and I do believe that he is a fine gentlemen. But the general population of the county do indeed knows - YOU ENJOY AND QUITE LIKE KILLING JOKE.

Esteban P. Buttez Esq., Monday, 11 July 2005 16:29 (twenty years ago)

i'm pretty sure they invented delta blues, too.

but anyway...

a band with an almost godly knowledge of, simply, what sounds GOOD, and how to play and produce it to sound that way. Just listen to the progression of early "Strawberry Fields Forever" demos on one of the Anthologies

one thing about the beatles, whether you love, like, hate 'em or just don't care, is that they had a remarkable understanding of their own strengths and weaknesses. virtually every outtake, alternate take and working version from the anthology series is WORSE than the officially released version, making it pretty damn clear how deliberately they worked toward something with every damn song. in just about every case, the released version is the RIGHT version, which is quite an achievement in itself. smart young lads they were.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:30 (twenty years ago)


Lest one be rude but is one and all rather ill of Alexander in Niue Amsterdam and his Killing Joke fixation? Offence or ill-will is not in my nature and I do believe that he is a fine gentlemen. But the general population of the county do indeed knows - YOU ENJOY AND QUITE LIKE KILLING JOKE.

You really need things spelled out for you, don't you:

Not to be rude, but is anyone else fucking sick of Alex in NYC and his Killing Joke fixation?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:32 (twenty years ago)

k/l utterly completely and totally nails it.

fact checking cuz (fcc), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Beatles = Classic
People Who Like The Beatles Too Much And Don't Listen To Other Stuff = Dud

Entirely OTM. One of my closest co-worker listens exclusively to the Beatles, goes to Beatles conventions, wears Beatles t-shirts, drops Beatles-related allusions into casual conversations. It's maddening. I mean, hey, it makes her happy -- and who am I to decry that? But, y'know.....I mean, get one life, as they say.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:34 (twenty years ago)

Mr. Alex in Niue Amsterdam, I am a humble man but I have gained enough intellect in the course of my natural life to spell. I thank ye for the help but I insist that I can manage of my own.

Esteban P. Buttez Esq., Monday, 11 July 2005 16:35 (twenty years ago)

"i've been working on an essay entitled I Hate The Beatles for a few weeks now."

Are you Allan Sherman?

My daughter needs a new phonograph.
She wore out all the needles.
Besides, I broke the old one in half.
I hate the Beatles.
She says they have a Liverpool beat.
She says they used to play there.
Four nice kids from offa the street.
Why didn't they stay there?
What is all the screaming about?
Fainting and swooning.
Sounds to me like their guitars
Could use a little tuning.
The boys are from the British Empire.
The British think they're keen.
If that is what the British desire,
God Save The Queen.
No daughter of mine can push me around.
In my home I'm the master.
But when the British come into town,
Gad, what a disaster.
Little girls in sneakers and jeans.
Destroyed the territory.
'Twas like some of the gorier scenes
From West Side Story.
Of course my daughter had to go there.
The tickets are cheap, she hollers.
I was able to pick up a pair
For forty-seven dollars.
When the Beatles come on the stage,
They scream and shriek and cheer them.
Now I know why they're such a rage,
It's impossible to hear them.
Ringo is the one with the drum,
The others all play with him.
It shows you what a boy can become
Without a sense of rhythm.
There's Beatle books and T-shirts and rings,
And one thing and another.
To buy my daughter all of these things,
I had to sell her brother.
Back in 1776
We fought the British then, folks.
Parents of America,
It's time to do it again, folks.
When they come back, here's how we'll begin,
We'll throw 'em in Boston harbor.
But please, before we toss 'em all in,
Let's take 'em to a barber.

Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:36 (twenty years ago)

I don't see why trying to say something interesting about the Beatles in 2005 should be ruled out. It's still a possibility. I'm not volunteering to try.

On the other hand, I don't see the point of this thread, when there are already so many Beatles threads here already, and it's not hard to find out where different people stand regarding the band.

RS LaRue (RSLaRue), Monday, 11 July 2005 16:46 (twenty years ago)

I last voluntarily listened to the Beatles in '96: it was very pleasant, and completely boring, and I don't care if I never hear them again

Banana Nutrament (ghostface), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:09 (twenty years ago)

Before the Beatles, no music could ever have been considered Beatles-esque.

Fact!

Josh in Chicago (Josh in Chicago), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:15 (twenty years ago)

Alex -- I got the joke. Difference is this the only time I think I've mentioned the Beatles on here (I may be wrong), whereas you've made everyone fucking aware that Killing Joke is your favorite band. We get it. You like the band. It's neither funny nor interesting and the more you talk about them (though you have all the right in the world to) the more I never want to listen to them again.

Also, I admit it, this thread was not necessary. I guess I'm just curious to see if some of the older people (who've been exposed to many many more bands than I have) have resigned themselves to the fact that the Beatles are the best they're likely to hear. Pointless thread? Maybe.

PB, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

*this IS the only time

PB, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:20 (twenty years ago)

the "fact" that the beatles are the best they're likely to hear.

I don't give a rat's ass about the beatles.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:23 (twenty years ago)

Not fact......opinion. Sorry.

PB, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:24 (twenty years ago)

PB. Don't get your knickers in a twist. I was just seizing an opportunity to get you back, so to speak. Don't dish it out if you can't take it.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:25 (twenty years ago)

Ah, I see. No harm.

Sooooo you don't like the Beatles, I gather?

PB, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:26 (twenty years ago)

No, I love the Beatles. I agreed with K/L's statement above. My only negative reactions regarding the Beatles have more to do with zealous, frothing Beatle fans than with the band themselves (who are, as you rightly postulated, deservedly untouchable).

Regardless of whatever one's inidivudal tastes may be, I can't really fathom anyone having a negative reaction to the Beatles. I just can't imagine it. I can completely understand being put off by the deification the Beatles have enjoyed over the ensuing decades, but the music itself? Who could argue with it?

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:31 (twenty years ago)

Arguing whether the Beatles were good or not is missing the point. The Beatles are now just *there* in the fabric of music history, and "hating" them is like hating Beethoven - their influence is inescapable.

mike a, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:34 (twenty years ago)

Beethoven is a cock

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

hahahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:35 (twenty years ago)

I can live the rest of my life without hearing "Hey Jude" or "Yesterday," again, but I do find myself going back to the album cuts and hearing new things in them.

mike a, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:36 (twenty years ago)

Yeah, I never need to hear "Hey Jude" or fucking "Let it Be" ever again, but....

"Hey Bulldog", "I Am the Walrus", "Tomorrow Never Knows", "Taxman", "Dr.Robert", "Helter Skelter", and many more......I will never get tired of.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:38 (twenty years ago)

moderator, set fire to this thread.

let us never speak of this again.

b b, Monday, 11 July 2005 17:40 (twenty years ago)

I am comfortable with the idea that the Beatles are the Best Band of All Time, but I rarely put on their records.

Mark (MarkR), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:41 (twenty years ago)

One idea about the Beatles that I've never given much thought to is the fact that because they were extremely successful at the beginning and sold loads and loads of records, they were given the luxury of unlimited studio time and a non-meddling record company, which they actually used to better their art and stay ahead of their contemporaries, which is one of the more unheralded aspects of their uniqueness, I think.

Supposedly, the Kink's record company was really frugal with them, and prevented Davies from really producing their music the way they wanted to. It's interesting to think about what might have happened had the Beatles been stuck with some similar situation, or if Epstein had not been around.

Viz (Viz), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:49 (twenty years ago)

Whatever. I hate that the Beatles are thought out as this untouchable thing, the bgeinning and end of pop music as an art form, a band that no other band can come close to, just by theory. It's like people don't even listen to the music.. tHe Beatles have long ago transcended their actual output.. they're this monolithic thing that gets credited for everything, the band that everyone has to aspire to be like, and it pisses me off like nothing else.

I have to admit, I agree with this sentiment. I haven't been coming into contact with that attitude enough lately to be really pissed off by it, though. It's not like I read Rolling Stone (though I remember being put off by their all-time top 500 some years ago), Geir doesn't usually get a lot of support here on ilm, none of the sites or blogs I visit do any 60s cannon worshiping, etc.

Maybe some day I'll "get" what's so great about them, but it's not a high priority for me. I'm generally much more interested in more current music.

sleep (sleep), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:52 (twenty years ago)

I'd rather listen to the Beatles than 99.9% of that post-punk everyone ("everyone") drools over, but I'd also rather listen to other things than either one.

RS LaRue (RSLaRue), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:54 (twenty years ago)

The Beatles are just about the only band I listened to 20 years ago that I still enjoy today. People who hate the Beatles remind me of people who hate animals.

darin (darin), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:57 (twenty years ago)

People who hate the Beatles remind me of people who hate animals.

Hahaha

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:58 (twenty years ago)

Well, that's the main reason I like the Beatles more than animals, really, is that I don't have to walk them, feed them or worry about them shedding all over my sofa.

Alex in NYC (vassifer), Monday, 11 July 2005 17:59 (twenty years ago)

insert joke about The Animals.

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Monday, 11 July 2005 18:02 (twenty years ago)

insert joke about pest control

sleep (sleep), Monday, 11 July 2005 18:04 (twenty years ago)

So basically I'm coming to the horrible realization that it's this UK Beatle blackout that is responsible for the emergence of Oasis, is that right?

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:23 (twenty years ago)

Well, before Oasis you had Candy Flip covering "Strawberry Fields Forever" and Danielle Dax doing "Tomorrow Never Knows," both big hits and revered by shoegazers, so it's not like U-Kayers didn't know about the Beatles.

Alfred Soto (Alfred Soto), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:24 (twenty years ago)

Danielle Dax not a big hit. Neither of those were 78-83, too.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:25 (twenty years ago)

i guess the rutles movie and beatlemania on broadway was the 70's too.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:34 (twenty years ago)

but, yeah, classic rock radio in the u.s. in the 80's and oldies radio was beatles-crazy. they never went away here.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)

I'm not sure if shoegazers revered candy flip! Terrible, terrible record!

see also S & the Bs "dear prudence" (a sort-of hit), Monsoon "Tomorrow Never Knows" (not a hit, but great)

Dr C is correct abt the bealtes being off the map in the late '70's-early '80's in the uk. There was this band who's single (IIRC called "101 damn-nations" - not carter usm, & google does not help here) got hyped to fuck back then, but didn't hit. They were total beatles fetishists, and their whole act at the time was just - weird.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:40 (twenty years ago)

Similarly when Tears For Fears had their big comeback with their Beatles tribute single, just after I'd started reading the rock press, the response seemed to me puzzled more than enthusiastic, like "OK, the Beatles were lovely, but this is 1989!"

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:45 (twenty years ago)

beatlemania on broadway

...which led the way to all kinds of Beatles tribute shows in the late '70s. First concert I ever saw was the Mahoney Bros., a Central Jersey Beatles tribute band. (They also did originals, which were more like subpar Badfinger.)

In the US until Mark David Chapman, it was like the Beatles were only taking a long hiatus after Abbey Road. Surprising that the situation was completely different in the UK.

mike a, Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:47 (twenty years ago)

who knows how many people colin newman corrupted with his cover of blue jay way!

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:48 (twenty years ago)

boy did we love us some "life in a northern town" in the U.S. but, inexplicably, even though sowing the seeds of love was a smash here, the dream academy's LOVE single went nowhere!

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:52 (twenty years ago)

"...which led the way to all kinds of Beatles tribute shows in the late '70s"

I saw the band *APPLE* at the first ever New England Beatles Convention! Musta been 1978 or so. I was just a kid. I was, by far, the youngest kid there. Apple played, and I got to see the Magical Mystery Tour movie. That was the highlight of my day.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 13:58 (twenty years ago)

haha I loved "Seeds Of Love" as a kid but I don't think I quite got it as a beatles pastiche! It's possible I just thought that's what good music sounded like.

miccio (miccio), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 14:02 (twenty years ago)

Haha, Scott, I must have walked by Toad's Place dozens of times when *APPLE* was playing there, but I never went in. Not when I saw the *APPLE* sign, anyway.

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 14:32 (twenty years ago)

**Dr C is correct abt the bealtes being off the map in the late '70's-early '80's in the uk. There was this band who's single (IIRC called "101 damn-nations" - not carter usm, & google does not help here) got hyped to fuck back then, but didn't hit. They were total beatles fetishists, and their whole act at the time was just - weird. **

Norman, I *think* that was Scarlet Party. They were hyped hugely for about 5 minutes in 82-ish. I remember seeing them live (they sent them out on the Univ tour) and they were wearing red Sgt Pepper jackets. You're right, it was just plain odd at the time. There was a sense of 'that's been *done*, why would anyone want to do THAT again?'

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 14:47 (twenty years ago)

I don't hate them--it's more like I'm bemused by them, since I think the Beatles kind of knew what a version of things that were often done better (but with less wit, compression and pop sense, which is the rub and which is why I don't hate the Beatles) they were.
It's been great fun for me to pretend to hate them more than I really do, especially since Geir is around. Shit, I bought Revolver on CD the other day--my very first, and probably last, Beatles CD. Not bad at all. But not as good as Radio City, probably. Or Buck Owens.

edd s hurt (ddduncan), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 14:48 (twenty years ago)

none of this changes my original point that this is not applicable to america. america 81-85 was boston, rick springfield, pat benatar, hall & oates, reo speedwagon with a minor new pop/mtv hiccup in about early '83.

Or ZZ Top. Or ...

George Smith, Tuesday, 12 July 2005 14:52 (twenty years ago)

Yr spot on, Dr C, it was scarlet party! I remember reading an interview w/the bassist in some musician magazine back then, where he was going on about how he PLAYED WITH A PICK, none of that SLAPPING AND POPPING NONSENSE, because PAUL McCARTNEY PLAYED WITH A PICK. And the interviewer was just totally baffled.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:04 (twenty years ago)

How does Scarlet Party stack up next to the Tea Party?

k/l (Ken L), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:09 (twenty years ago)

x-post I was (and still am) partial to a bit of slapping and popping nonsense.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:11 (twenty years ago)

"They were hyped hugely for about 5 minutes in 82-ish."

in 1980, i suffered from a terrible case of adamant-itis. i know, i know, they were pirates, but still...

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:25 (twenty years ago)

so, wait, The Jam weren't big in the U.K. between 1980 and 1982?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:26 (twenty years ago)

They were, but somehow managed to get away w/the fact that TH3Y RIPP3D 0FF TH3 WH0 S0METH1NG R0TT3N for a while because they were "punks".

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:37 (twenty years ago)

Oh yeah, "taxma..." sorry, "Start", that was mentioned, w/excerpts from each track being played on the radio, but I'm sure the intro to "taxman" was the only beatles I heard on the radio that year!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:40 (twenty years ago)

and the late-70's mod revivalists probably only listened to the small faces and little eva rekkerds, right?

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:43 (twenty years ago)

I've no idea! They were all rubbish!!

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:46 (twenty years ago)

but they were around, right? and they weren't listening to Joy Division.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:47 (twenty years ago)

I guess, yes. The mod revival was just after 2-tone iirc, and at our school at least, it was all the same people who (arf...) were into it.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:49 (twenty years ago)

The mod revival was so fucking pathetic! At the same time, prophetic w/r/t british "indie" music was going to go 20-odd years later!

Also, most/all of these bands were clinging desperately onto the jam's coattails.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 15:58 (twenty years ago)

so, in the late 70's/early 80's in the u.k., you had mod revivals, skinhead revivals, rockabilly revivals, almost everything BUT a beatles revival. yeah, i know, everyone was looking to the future. some of those psychobilly haircuts were pretty futuristic. And meanwhile, I just picked up that great Misunderstood comp on Cherry Red from the early 80's. They knew the score. Them and Peely, god bless him.

scott seward (scott seward), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 17:37 (twenty years ago)

and Phil Smee

Dan Selzer (Dan Selzer), Tuesday, 12 July 2005 17:50 (twenty years ago)

the uk did have an extremely shortlived (and commercially dud) beatley psychedelic revival during late '81/early '82 - mood six, nick nicely etc.

also "love me do" was reissued on the 20th anniversary of its original release in 1982 and went top five. at the same time there was a minor rash of old-school beatle soundalikes, the most successful of which was "danger games" by the pinkees, played to death by radio 1 and hyped to number eight in the charts.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 05:04 (twenty years ago)

**and the late-70's mod revivalists probably only listened to the small faces and little eva rekkerds, right? **

I had a quick flick thru Terry Rawling's 'Mod- A Very British Phenomenon' last night to see what the likes of The Chords and The Purple Hearts had to say. It's as I thought - these guys were pretty much soul boys who were energized by punk, then picked up on The Who (Quadrophenia!), Small Faces, The Creation etc. Pretty much the same as Weller. The Beatles don't figure. I don't think anyone realised how much of a Beatles fan Weller was until Taxman, but also you have to remember that Sound Affects was also sounding a bit like Wire, Joy Div etc, so people recognized the stealing of the Taxman riff, but thought it was a bit of a one-off.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 05:52 (twenty years ago)

laura, who was something of a jam/mod fanatic in those days, never liked the beatles except bits of revolver, grudgingly.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 06:52 (twenty years ago)

and she HATED "taxman" ("it's ploddy!" which was always her worst musical insult. if it plodded, it was out the window)!

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 06:53 (twenty years ago)

there's a mojo or uncut special solo beatles edition on the stands, i flipped through it tonight and noticed that joe strummer was among the ppl quoted in the original nme coverage of JL's assassination saying he was "devastated."

do you like the beatles, marcello? i can't recall you ever saying.

J.D. (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 07:06 (twenty years ago)

I tend to vacillate between the 62-66 model and the 67-70 model in terms of preferences, but I've no problem with the Beatles (as opposed to the culture that's been allowed to grow around them posthumously, which I do find very problematic).

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 07:44 (twenty years ago)

x-post Laura sounds great, M. Was your Northern Soul enthusiasm more her interest, or yours?

The Jam - how I love them. I remember starting a C/D thread waaay back on ILM, and being taken aback by the loathing.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 08:47 (twenty years ago)

To begin with, N/Soul was maybe a bit more Laura than me, but it tied in with the whole mod thing and we were both mad about Dexy's in particular ("Seven Days Too Long," etc.). This is from the days when we were still just Smash Hits penpals! When I came down here in the '80s we went to a lot of all-nighters, day trips to Todmorden to look for rare 45s in the Goldmine shop, etc. - we were really into the whole scene (as well as all the other scenes we were also into at the time, albeit not as intensely).

The reason why I played "Do I Love You (Indeed I Do)" by Frank Wilson at the top of my Clear Spot programme last year was because it was our wedding song.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:01 (twenty years ago)

joe strummer was among the ppl quoted in the original nme coverage of JL's assassination saying he was "devastated."


I've always found that punk statement "no more beatles, stones, etc" silly.

AleXTC (AleXTC), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:08 (twenty years ago)

x-post - did Laura hail from oop North then? Did you ever make it to the Cleethorpes Winter Gardens for an all-nighter?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:11 (twenty years ago)

Born in Inverness-shire, but not up there long enough to acquire a Scottish accent - moved to Dorset shortly thereafter but essentially grew up in Oxford.

We were big on Lincs so we probably did make it to the Cleethorpe WGs - will have to check the old diaries 'cos we did go to a lot of 'em.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:21 (twenty years ago)

I saw the Sex Pistols at CWGs! Why were you big on Lincs?

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:22 (twenty years ago)

Just liked the county, that's all, ditto Norfolk, Suffolk, bits of Cambs (all-nighters at St Neots I do recall, though can't remember the name of the venue) etc.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 09:39 (twenty years ago)

The Stars on 45 Beatles medley single in late 81 or early 82 would have been the first exposure to the Beatles for a lot of 11 and 12 year olds in my class at the time. Or at least knowing it was The Beatles who sung those songs. The current NME Originals is interesting for getting a British perception of the Beatles during the 70s. Even Lennon’s murder didn’t seem to mean that much on this side of the Atlantic compared to the reaction in the US. Would this be correct? There there was too much early 80s doom and glooom going on in society for people to be already worried about.

David Gunnip (David Gunnip), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 10:19 (twenty years ago)

Dunno about that. The morning after Lennon was shot I had to go for my interview to get into Oxford. We woke with the news and everyone was a bit dazed, though muted in comparison with last Thursday. As far as music heads were concerned it was the last nail in a grim 1980 coffin - the "future of music" having died with Ian Curtis and the "history" having died with Lennon (in that week's NME there was famously a double shock when they received the erroneous report that Marley had died the same day). But I don't recall any weeping candlelit vigils, though I'm sure in Liverpool and elsewhere there must have been some. The back catalogue went back up the charts the following week and stayed there for about two months. After that Adam and the Ants struck big by essentially cheering everybody up and reintroducing colour into pop, and things.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 10:26 (twenty years ago)

As the 80s dragged on though the Beatles, as Ian Macdonald wrote in his book, became more a museum piece that lacked any real relevence tot he MTV generation. I guess it was hard during the 80s to get any real info on "the sixties" as it was before the 90s trend of myriad exhastive books or 30 page Mojo/Uncut retrospectives covering all the angles. Did the music papers ever run any retrospective articles between 82 and 87 apart from say Velvet Underground features?

David Gunnip (David Gunnip), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 10:51 (twenty years ago)

There were IIRC quite a lot of things about the 10th anniversary of punk in '86/7. Also a lot about Real Soul and Proper Music Like Aretha Not Plastic Cocktail Crap.

In the NME's 1985 Top 50 Albums list, two of the Top 10 were recorded in the '60s - Velvets' VU, and Sam Cooke Live At The Harlem Square Club. In the same year the NME updated their All-Time Top 100 Albums list - soulboy nirvana.

There was a fair amount of media kerfuffle when the 20th anniversary of Sgt Pepper rolled around and the Beatles' back catalogue came out on CD.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 10:57 (twenty years ago)

Did the music papers ever run any retrospective articles between 82 and 87 apart from say Velvet Underground features?

Well, there wasn't really any need. Most was fresh in memory, detail was covered in books, and stuff that wasn't was known only to a select few that were keeping the info to themselves.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 11:11 (twenty years ago)

>It exists the way Alfred Hitchcock's filmography exists: something beloved of prior generations that has fuck-all to do with my life.<

eh, still sad, Morrissey?

Dr Morbius (Dr Morbius), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:18 (twenty years ago)

He writes for the Wire, where every day is like last Thursday.

Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Wednesday, 13 July 2005 12:22 (twenty years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.