― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:15 (nineteen years ago)
― senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:20 (nineteen years ago)
― senseiDancer (sexyDancer), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:21 (nineteen years ago)
― The Man Without Shadow (Enrique), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:22 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:26 (nineteen years ago)
By the way, has anyone else had just about enough of Jack White referring to people as "children"?
― Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:30 (nineteen years ago)
― Huk-L (Huk-L), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:31 (nineteen years ago)
― Jack White (Aaron W), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:33 (nineteen years ago)
― mike h. (mike h.), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 16:55 (nineteen years ago)
― cdwill (cdwill), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:11 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:13 (nineteen years ago)
― cdwill (cdwill), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:17 (nineteen years ago)
Funny, though. He'd be insane to be that upset just because someone doesn't care for his band -- sounds a lot more like he's feeling some weird betrayal. "After all the nice things we've said about you!"
― nabisco (nabisco), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:19 (nineteen years ago)
Pretty funny how White doesn't seem to think he's "plagiarizing" Childish, though.
― cdwill (cdwill), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:24 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:28 (nineteen years ago)
― hold tight the private caller (mwah), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:32 (nineteen years ago)
― cdwill (cdwill), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:44 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 17:51 (nineteen years ago)
― mike a, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:22 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:29 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:33 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:35 (nineteen years ago)
I'm beginning to think there's a little Jim Morrison in Jack White.
― TRG (TRG), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:41 (nineteen years ago)
Seemingly hurt by muted reaction to The White Stripes last album ‘Get Behind Me Satan’ White has used the bands official website to give us journos a bit of a telling off.
White wrote of the record: “What a funny album, coming from divided critics to supposed disappointing sales, to going platinum in several countries, to making most critics top ten lists, to winning a Grammy. That’s funny right?”
Now onto his diatribe against reviewers, he added: “They all play a coward’s game. Only one side to their playground. Such an easy fight that way. The faceless opinion of print and the internet. What is it teaching all of us?”
“Back when there was a time when we had great writers, and respected journalists who had earned their position as tastemakers, and won peoples respect with their knowledge and insight, it was much easier to understand a written opinion because at least you knew who it was coming from.”
He went on: “Now those printed opinions are probably coming from the person sitting next to you in the mall. Why should you care about their opinion? Why shouldn’t you?”
“Critics are the only public expression that isn’t ‘allowed’ to be critiqued. Be careful children, you don’t have to listen to all those opinions out there, and not even this one you are reading.”
“Remember the person’s opinion you are reading probably knows less about less about the topic you are interested in than you do.”
http://www.gigwise.com/news.asp?contentid=14081
― James Mitchell (James Mitchell), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:42 (nineteen years ago)
― Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:43 (nineteen years ago)
― Jack Cole (jackcole), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:47 (nineteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:48 (nineteen years ago)
jack needs to join ILM
Jim DeRogatis - C/DTaking sides: Greil Marcus vs Dave EggarsDo you ever read one of Christgau's reviews and go, What the hell is he talking about?
― that's so taylrr (ken taylrr), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:49 (nineteen years ago)
Wait, when was this magical time? And if it did exist, wouldn't it have precluded the White Stripes from developing their initial late '90s zine/club buzz?
― mike a, Wednesday, 1 March 2006 18:55 (nineteen years ago)
― scott seward (scott seward), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:09 (nineteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 19:18 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 21:55 (nineteen years ago)
(I can't believe no one already said that. Were you guys just thinking it but considered it too dumb to even say?)
― Abbadavid Berman (Hurting), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 22:02 (nineteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson (Matt Helgeson), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 22:05 (nineteen years ago)
I had somehow not managed to come up with Wite Stripe. Congrats!
― Rick Massimo (Rick Massimo), Wednesday, 1 March 2006 22:09 (nineteen years ago)
Older White Stripes, especially De Stijl, were poppier and more fun to listen to than the newer variety in spite of the critical acclaim.
The Billy & Holly record is In Blood and it's fun but not as good as older White Stripes. It's mostly better than the Holly & Dan Melchior one though. Neither is as good as most solo Holly records, with the possible exception of Slowly But Surely though maybe I haven't really given that one a fair shake.
― lykvun stratta, Thursday, 2 March 2006 02:57 (nineteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 2 March 2006 03:00 (nineteen years ago)
― Bimble The Nimble (Bimble...), Thursday, 2 March 2006 04:33 (nineteen years ago)
― Slash Stab, Saturday, 4 March 2006 21:53 (nineteen years ago)
― Fritz Wollner (Fritz), Saturday, 4 March 2006 21:56 (nineteen years ago)
Maybe it is because many of Childish's records go out of print in swirly vinyl editions of 50 and people have only heard about them more than actually heard them.
― Earl Nash (earlnash), Sunday, 5 March 2006 00:17 (nineteen years ago)
― js (honestengine), Sunday, 5 March 2006 02:14 (nineteen years ago)
― lykvun stratta, Sunday, 5 March 2006 04:30 (nineteen years ago)
This is kind of a version of reverse rockism, isn't it? That magical time way back when, when critics wrote "real" reviews and people respected them, instead of some upstart critic offering their opinion (who cares if their criticism is good?).
― hgfhg, Sunday, 5 March 2006 05:50 (nineteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 5 March 2006 18:24 (nineteen years ago)
― cdwill (cdwill), Sunday, 5 March 2006 22:07 (nineteen years ago)
Indie guys make limited editions, because they want to 'sell out' (ironically). Stock unsold = stock they paid for.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 6 March 2006 09:33 (nineteen years ago)
If he told me it was raining, I'd look out the window mate.
― mark grout (mark grout), Monday, 6 March 2006 09:34 (nineteen years ago)
― xgurggleglgllg (xgurggleglgllg), Monday, 6 March 2006 09:47 (nineteen years ago)