I prefer using Sonar. I dont do protools because I've never gotten any of their hardware, and the free version does not work on my windows XP. so i have no experience with that. What i don't really get is Cubase - I have used this, and find the interface of Sonar to be much more usable/intuitive.
can i hear from others who have something against sonar? how about those who love Cubase, or Protools or something else instead and have tried other multitrack packages - what made you stick with what you're using now?
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 20 April 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)
Also:
Cubase: Classic or Dud?ableton 5 vs reason 3
― Jordan (Jordan), Thursday, 20 April 2006 18:34 (nineteen years ago)
― 0nous, Thursday, 20 April 2006 20:51 (nineteen years ago)
jordan, why do you say the EQs are better?
― AaronK (AaronK), Thursday, 20 April 2006 23:10 (nineteen years ago)
― Jordan (Jordan), Friday, 21 April 2006 01:54 (nineteen years ago)
but i learned in protools first. i like cubase though and have been using it since ver. 4 (OS 9!?). if protools were to make a free version for OSX i'd hit it.
real question is cubase sx vs. nuendo? they're so similar. i'd use nuendo if i could afford it
― nervous.gif (eman), Friday, 21 April 2006 02:51 (nineteen years ago)
sure, the bundled protools stuff is probably better than any other onboard DAW EQ, but there are tons of amazing eq plug-ins out there at a fraction of the cost.
logic's onboard stuff is quite generic - ok for workhorse stuff but not a lot of flavour - love the interface and the audio/midi features though. so why go for all the bells and whistles when i can run Logic express 7.2 instead of the full version and spend the difference on some lovely plugs?
protools is fantastic if you're stuck for ideas about how to spend your trust fund. i wouldn't get suckered into that line of thinking - check the price!
― john clarkson, Friday, 21 April 2006 11:47 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 21 April 2006 12:14 (nineteen years ago)
i'm talking btw about PT ridiculous hardware prices not their free download DAW LE. screw waves also w/ their rip-off business practices.
like this!! http://www.focusrite.com/productdetails.asp?id=62&iRange=1
40 compressors, 20 eq's, 32 channels, onboard dsp via firewire under £500. mmmm eyes glaze over. must have...
― john clarkson, Friday, 21 April 2006 12:52 (nineteen years ago)
hahahahahahah that's fucking insane
― john clarkson, Friday, 21 April 2006 13:25 (nineteen years ago)
― AaronK (AaronK), Friday, 21 April 2006 14:08 (nineteen years ago)
― Minimaxi, Friday, 21 April 2006 14:44 (nineteen years ago)
(x-post)i was dreaming of getting my hands on a liquid channel but knew i'd never ever be able to afford one. then i knew i'd be dreaming of having another one for the stereo bus and so on. now they made this.
it's like they read my freakin mind, made it 50x better and cut the cost by 2/3rds.
― john clarkson, Friday, 21 April 2006 15:29 (nineteen years ago)
the thing about it is you can't use it in windows - linux and mac only. and it's kind of a bitch to get it to run VST plugins, but it can. the LADSPA plugins that it likes are cool but limited
― bhcxjk, Saturday, 22 April 2006 19:35 (nineteen years ago)
"For the people," hmmmm. I was able to secure the last edition of Cool Edit Pro before it became Adobe Audition, Acid 4.0, CD Architect and a ton of loop libraries, most of which I'll never need, on eBay for around ninety dollars. Came with manual in a binder, too, apparently part of a corporate licensing that was being retired. That's virtually free, plus it runs on my platform. The idea behind Audacity is ambitious but ...
― George 'the Animal' Steele, Saturday, 22 April 2006 21:43 (nineteen years ago)
On the plus side it did introduce me to JackOSX though which seems like something that might come in handy for other audio apps I have, I'll have to play around with that.
― /me aaaaaaaaaa (eman), Wednesday, 26 April 2006 21:24 (nineteen years ago)
Cheers
― Ian McIntyre (Cinder), Thursday, 11 May 2006 17:56 (nineteen years ago)
― Ian McIntyre (Cinder), Thursday, 11 May 2006 18:00 (nineteen years ago)
But I've used ProTools a lot and I like it. I can work quite efficiently in it. I like Sonar, too, but the ProTools setup I've used has way better plugins and what have you.
― Steve Goldberg (Steve Goldberg), Saturday, 13 May 2006 01:27 (nineteen years ago)
SHIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIT
― Unlimited Toothpicker (eman), Saturday, 13 May 2006 01:35 (nineteen years ago)
― tricubra duamada, Monday, 15 May 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)
xpost
― jng (jng), Monday, 15 May 2006 07:14 (nineteen years ago)
― ringtones free, Saturday, 29 July 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)
― Shoes say, yeah, no hands clap your good bra. (goodbra), Saturday, 29 July 2006 03:58 (nineteen years ago)
― The GZeus (The GZeus), Saturday, 29 July 2006 05:29 (nineteen years ago)
TRACKTION
― Tracer Hand, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 16:13 (seventeen years ago)
I've recently been mucking about with a mic and a cheap delay pedal. Good fun, although the pedal doesn't do quite a long enough delay for what I'm doing. Is there some sort of program that will let me do the same thing? I mean, is there something like Audacity which you can start recording and then set to loop back at some point while continuing to record?
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 21:33 (seventeen years ago)
Do you have a Mac? I think some of the audio units can do this
― Catsupppppppppppppp dude 茄蕃, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 21:34 (seventeen years ago)
nah i have a crap pc.
― the next grozart, Wednesday, 30 April 2008 22:46 (seventeen years ago)
― Tracer Hand, Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:29 (seventeen years ago)
I use Reaper and find it quite good for this sort of thing - you can set loop points and start recording and when it gets to the end loop point, the recording starts as a take on the next track at the start loop point. Is that what you're trying to do?
― Rob M v2, Thursday, 1 May 2008 15:33 (seventeen years ago)
I just got the Apogee Duet, and I'd just like to say, HALLELUJAH! After fuxing with the Konnekt24D that we had for a while, this is a godsend.
Also, so that N/A doesn't feel like it's another gear post, which it is. We've also written some new songs on the gear! And they're not bad! Or at least, they sound cool! Little Jim Keltner on the drumses!
― Jubalique die Zitronen, Wednesday, 11 June 2008 21:25 (seventeen years ago)
i downloaded reaper yesterday and spent a chunk of the day experimenting with it but i feel like i might be too dumb for it. i can't get it to recognize my keyboard as a controller for soft synths. i put the instructions on my kindle though so i can slog through them.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 16:19 (twelve years ago)
Maybe your setup is different, but I use a MIDI keyboard with softsynths in Reaper like this:
1) Add a new track2) Choose (my audio interface) MIDI as track input3) Add softsynth to track FX4) Turn on track input monitoring5) Arm track for recording
― St3ve Go1db3rg, Tuesday, 4 December 2012 17:18 (twelve years ago)
thanks, i think i just need to slog through the instructions and muddle my way through. i thought it would be more intuitive than it is.
― congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 4 December 2012 19:16 (twelve years ago)