are the "Hide images" links less forgiving than regular parser?

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I turned on "Hide Images" when at work, and a small number of images get replaced with links that don't work.

[635472437_l.jp]
i didn't photoshop this... my cameraphone is just that bad!

-- tehresa (boringstandardaddres...), April 7th, 2006 7:57 PM. (tehresa) (link)

---

[gello.jp]

-- Momus (nic...), April 8th, 2006 5:25 AM. (Momus) (link)

These two posters used IMG SRC, but not the " around the URL.
The images are on the page just fine when I turn off that "hide images" setting.

Is the "hide images" code more strict than the regular code or is this what that "this may corrupt certain messages" disclaimer is saying?

(or: is this a genuine bug or a stupid question?)

― StanM (StanM), Saturday, 8 April 2006 04:58 (twenty years ago)

i have noticed this too.

― haitch (haitch), Saturday, 8 April 2006 05:47 (twenty years ago)

Yeah it clips the g off the ".jpg" - always wondered what caused that.

― Trayce (trayce), Monday, 10 April 2006 03:33 (twenty years ago)

the hide images code is a bit shit. not generic enough. the submit post parser could help cleaning up some too.

― Britain's Obtusest Shepherd (Alan), Monday, 10 April 2006 15:28 (twenty years ago)

I can't believe ILX lets people post stuff without quotes around html property values.

― Fight the Real Enemy -- Tasti D-Lite (ex machina), Monday, 10 April 2006 15:49 (twenty years ago)

OMG I CANNOT BELIEVE DIS SHIT

― Andrew (enneff), Tuesday, 11 April 2006 00:56 (twenty years ago)

This thread has been locked by an administrator

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.