Why has my post been deleted (without discussion, apparently)?

A question was asked, bringing up issues about the fickle nature of bisexuality, I responded with song lyrics about the fickle nature of bisexuality. They were nothing more than a facetious response to an anonymous question, of the type that many, many ILXers are guilty of. These are lyrics which have been published, released, and played on North American radio. Quoting them is well within fair use.

*Someone* decided that these lyrics were intended for them. (I"m guessing the same person that was asserting USING MY NAME on "This is the thread where..." that I had written lyrics about her.) Until she raised this little stink about a passing post, there wasn't a shred of evidence on ILX linking her with the lyrics - EXCEPT THAT WHICH SHE POSTED HERSELF.

This was not a big deal until she made it into one. If my posts can be deleted because they mention a common name which happens to be shared by an ILXer, than can I please request the deletion of posts which mention me, very specifically by name?

I'm not very clear here about what you're claiming; on the thread you mention that the offended party was bragging about the song being about them, while here you're claiming that it's a common name and anyhow it's fair use because it's been on the radio. If the song is, indeed, about the person in question, certainly you understand why continuing to poke this sore spot is a bad idea? Again, assuming it is about that person?

Since my post has been deleted for being "personal", I feel that I am well within my rights in asking for this post to be deleted:

It mentions me very specifically by name, makes untenable personal allegations about me, and therefore meets every criteria for deletion:

[link removed to make it all nice and anonymous again]

I want this post, or at least the paragraph making personal allegations about me deleted. If my posts are deleted, let hers be deleted for the same reason.

Um... touche. No?

I mean this is obviously hyperbole, but she kinda has a point.

Just kidding!

I'm actually kind of glad that you left the rest of that post entact. Because, you know, for someone who is trying to stay "anonymous", directly linking to a blog so that a post from ILX that shows their "new identity" shows up in their referrals log is a pretty self defeating thing to do. Just sayin', you know...

Is that not perhaps a clue that the "Sam" who posted the link and the "$us@n" that the blog is about are one and the same?

I'm sorry to keep on about this, but the level of hypocrisy involved is quite astonishing.

It's just a bit rich to complain, and have deleted, a lyric which just happens to contain the name of one of her multiple identities, which she herself quite merrily outs herself on another thread.

In all seriousness, if she really is as "proud" of being the alleged subject of the song as she said that she was, then, honestly, one would have thought she would not have a problem with it being quoted.