Marvel's Civil War

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
http://www.newsarama.com/marvelnew/CivilWar/civilwar_title-.jpg

Umm, okay, let's start with this question: What the hell is Daredevil doing in this image? The dude's in jail!

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Wednesday, 8 February 2006 23:52 (nineteen years ago)

Also, how did Iron Man get so much bigger than everyone else? He's huge!

Occam, Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:11 (nineteen years ago)

DAEREST MARVEL,

TEHRE R UTHER MUTNATS B-SIDES WOLFERINE

Dan (Yawn) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:14 (nineteen years ago)

i am on captain america's side.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:32 (nineteen years ago)

There should have been a six-issue setup called "Civil Disobedience".

scamperingalpaca (Chris Hill), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:38 (nineteen years ago)

What, in general, is the idea?

The photo + the title have me ph34ring some Infinite Crisis sadface.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:44 (nineteen years ago)

From what I can tell, this is the Marvel version of "Oh no, Superman and Batman and Wonder Woman aren't friends anymore!"

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:53 (nineteen years ago)

Also, there's some kind of superhero registration act thing involved, a la the Mutant Registration Act in the late 80s.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 00:55 (nineteen years ago)

is there any rumor yet of what kicks off the registration act?? anyways, it's nice to see that marvel takes a backseat to no one when it comes to crappy overseriousness

dave k, Thursday, 9 February 2006 01:11 (nineteen years ago)

I'm guessing the hubbub re: Matt Murdock's incarceration might play a not-so-slight role!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 01:23 (nineteen years ago)

I hope that Brubaker does something with people in Hell's Kitchen getting all "Free Mumia!" about Murdock's incarceration.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:13 (nineteen years ago)

Other than ASM leading up to this, do we know what's definitely tying in?

I was under the impression Bendis's Illuminati led up to Civil War, too, but I'm not sure.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:18 (nineteen years ago)

Mike Carey and Ed Brubaker both made it clear that it wasn't crossing over into X-Men or Uncanny X-Men, and it's super doubtful that it's going to take up space in Whedon's Astonishing X-Men. So it seems like this is mainly an Avengers/Spidey/FF/Wolverine thing.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:21 (nineteen years ago)

Well, that puts off my picking up the FF a little while longer. I think I still feel a little burned by defending House of M as "possibly really cool" when it was still in the "coming soon" stage.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:23 (nineteen years ago)

It's weird, I didn't think there was anything remotely cool about House of M until after it was over. And even then, not really.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:38 (nineteen years ago)

house of M should have been five or six issues long, not eight.

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:49 (nineteen years ago)

This is the thread where we mourn Bendis' fall from grace.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:51 (nineteen years ago)

i actually have NO IDEA what this civil war thing is about. i don't read FF or spidey, but there's been no mention of it in captain america, new avengers (unless i missed it?) or iron man. i bet it will be tedious and best avoided. (what is the good spidey book to read these days, btw? sometimes i have a jones.)

Special Agent Gene Krupa (orion), Thursday, 9 February 2006 03:53 (nineteen years ago)

It's only been mentioned in promo for the event! I think this Avengers: Illuminati one-shot mentioned upthread is when the shebang officially kicks off, and then everything gets stupid. Well, OFFICIALLY officially, the next issue of Amazing Spider-Man comes w/ a stupid CIVIL WAR HEA! banner on it, so I guess no collection's complete w/out that there thing.

Before this thread is subsumed in IC-esque vitriol & pith, let us remember the original Civil War thread, started by the late, great Tom. Here is a link. In case you're joining us late, Tom was chosen as the newest herald of Galactus. He is now ... THE CONCATENATOR. Godspeed, Tom, and, please, when the G gets the munchies, make sure those meeping Martian bastards get it first.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:27 (nineteen years ago)

PS - Best Spidey title = Ultimate Spider-Man. Unless you really want to deal w/ all this newfangled Spider Totem hoonja-doonja (& I don't recommend it), stick w/ that. & the Spidey / Human Torch mini from last year, I'm With Stupid.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:29 (nineteen years ago)

I'm gonna bet PAD's Spidey is worth buying once it's on its own, but yeah, I second that (those) recommendation(s).

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:39 (nineteen years ago)

Mind you, my pull list currently reads "everything with Spider-Man in it." But I'm taking JMS's Amazing off next time I'm in there.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:40 (nineteen years ago)

Yeah, the only Spider-Man title I'm going near is PAD's once this Other crap stops and PAD actually starts telling his stories.

Spidey/Human Torch was very good, though.

The Yellow Kid, Thursday, 9 February 2006 04:45 (nineteen years ago)

What's so civil about war anyway???????????

The tone here is definitely po of face, O NOES blood on the shield! And "A Marvel Comics Event in 7 Parts" has an ELP triple-album vibe to it too, whatever happened to "#1 in a 7 issue miniseries" in that nice font across the top?

That said the way it's been talked up makes it seem like it's going to be metaphorisin' a real world situation (civil liberties/Patriot Act/etc.) in the Mighty Marvel Manner. As opposed to DC, where the divisive situation is completely arbitrary and the real driving conflict is "DO WE RETCON CRISIS?". You would think that the real-world dilemma would make for better stories, but on the other hand clearly it's going to motivate fans less.

(Also I get the definite feeling that Joe Q has cried wolf a few times too often about the Huge Importance of these various events.)

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 9 February 2006 10:34 (nineteen years ago)

What strikes me in that image is that it doesn't really seem like much of a fair fight, like, unless they *really* wanna piss ppl off it's pretty obvious which side is gonna end up having been a bit more right than the other. Spidey, Wolverine, She-Hulk, Daredevil and the other cool, righteous loners will refuse to give up their secret identities, while misled, square Iron Man and Fantastic Four will ill-advisedly go along with the idea, only to learn later on that they were wrong to do so.

I mean, Spidey & Wolvie on the same team, c'mon, they're not gonna have them be in the wrong.

Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 9 February 2006 13:17 (nineteen years ago)

Asking Wolverine to reveal his secret identity would be kind of like The 500 Hats of Bartholomew Cubbins.

Anyway, yeah, the initial thing that turned me off of all this junk even as disposable ha-ha crap was finding out Bendis was putting his Illuminati gag -- which I'd been reading as a gag, anyway, you know, "oh yeah, of course a few of the more influential Marvelites get together for tea and arguing once in a while, it's the 21st century take on the Thing's old poker game with Dr Strange" -- to work as a serious comic with Ooh! New! Revealed! Secret! History! (more than a one-shot, I thought? a series or handful of one-shots? Maybe that was folded into Civil War, in actuality or in my head). It would be dumb enough even without recycling the Illuminati name -- is there anyone in the world with matching shoes who isn't sick of the factory-issued set of conspiracy theories by the end of their freshman year, if not the conspiracy theory genre in toto?

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 13:36 (nineteen years ago)

To collate: Wikipedia on Bendisimati.

And on Marvel Civil War.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 13:47 (nineteen years ago)

HAHAHAHAHAHAHA "Bartholomew Cubbins"!

Dan (OMG) Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 9 February 2006 13:54 (nineteen years ago)

oh well, at least we should be thankful that this Earth Shaking Event isn't being caused by Scarlet Witch going mental because her mystical ovaries are out of control, for once - though fear of ovaries could explain why there are no women in the Illuminati

Mark C (Markco), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:00 (nineteen years ago)

It would almost be kinda Bendisy to reveal that Viper is or was a secret member of the Illuminati. I can't think of any other women -- maybe the Wasp -- who could be included without seeming forced, given when they were formed.

Dan, go read my X-Factor joke.

Te(hardly ever shills)p (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:09 (nineteen years ago)

I guess the problem with that cover is that it suggests that the guys on the left are at war with the guys on the right, when we already know that Spidey is on the same side as I-Ron Man. And in a secret identity pissing match, you'd imagine She-Hulk would be more on the "no secret ID please" side, considering.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:27 (nineteen years ago)

Po-faced Mark Millar doesn't inspire much fealty in me. Also, enough w/ the Michael Turner love-in already. Unless he does Civil Hulk Tears in homage to his Identity Superman Tears.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:37 (nineteen years ago)

&, for the record, I am buying this, because, um, it's either this or crank?

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:40 (nineteen years ago)

Is that Namor on the loners side? And I guess Spidey's palship with Iron Man and his wonderful toys won't last. (duh)
It's attititudinal cool kids vs. science nerds, huh, with Spidey turning his back on science nerds FOREVER!!!

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:41 (nineteen years ago)

Maybe the reason Marvellians aren't getting along is because Hulk left the planet and Hulk was secretly the glue that held them all together!

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:46 (nineteen years ago)

What's the deal with Yellowjacket? Is that Hank Pym?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:50 (nineteen years ago)

Yeppers.

SCIENCE VERSUS VIGILANTES, WITH AMERICA IN THE MIDDLE

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:51 (nineteen years ago)

Does Namor even have a secret identity? (Rephrased: does Namor currently have a solo title?)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:52 (nineteen years ago)

At least he still has his hand.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)

Well wait, it doesn't matter. He's in the Bendismati and it all starts with a rift between them I think. He's a costume sympathizer.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:53 (nineteen years ago)

Why does no one call him The Sub-Mariner anymore?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:54 (nineteen years ago)

Was it distracting too many people with the thought of sandwiches or something?

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:55 (nineteen years ago)

It makes us wonder if there isn't a Dom-Mariner out there.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)

I think the Sub-Mariner to Namor what-we-call-him ratio has varied in proportion to the supervillain/menace to hero/monarch how-the-writers-use-him ratio, at least in the post-Silver Age. That's a serious answer, but not necessarily correct.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:56 (nineteen years ago)

Except you have to either ignore The Defenders there, consider it Silver Age, or consider Defenders-member Sub-Mariner to count as a "menace" (which might work).

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:57 (nineteen years ago)

It's hard for me to take Namor seriously when he's a prissy metrosexual from under the sea who is only interesting when he's macking on Reed Richards' wife.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 15:04 (nineteen years ago)

Take him seriously as a menace, that is.

Matthew C Perpetua (inca), Thursday, 9 February 2006 15:05 (nineteen years ago)

I like his outfit. He's like the sixth Village People or something

i0dine, Thursday, 9 February 2006 16:09 (nineteen years ago)

It makes us wonder if there isn't a Dom-Mariner out there.

Dom Mariani has a band called The Majestic Kelp, if that helps?

kit brash (kit brash), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:20 (nineteen years ago)

I look forward to the day that a drunken Lori Lemaris stumbles on ILC after googling "Dom Mariner."

Tep (ktepi), Friday, 10 February 2006 01:32 (nineteen years ago)

What Dave said.

Also, other than USAgent and Iron Man, I think you'd be pretty hard-pressed to find any record of political conservatism in the FF or Avengers. I don't think law enforcement or cooperation with the government are inherently conservative, politically, but Civil War's been written as if there's a direct correlation between the former and the latter. The results are just silly and cartoonish.

barefoot manthing (Garrett Martin), Friday, 19 January 2007 22:31 (eighteen years ago)

i bought this really bad parody by mistake called civil wardrobe :(

chaki (chaki), Friday, 19 January 2007 23:13 (eighteen years ago)

Okay, but isn't cartoonish exaggeration that gets to the point of the differences between the characters still preferable to the pointless, incoherent mess of Infinite Crisis? I agree about most negative points about the execution of Civil War, but I think it did more good for the characters in the long run than can be attributed to Infinite Crisis, which in itself offered very little other than to do the One Year Later thing and 52, which have both offered mixed results.

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:42 (eighteen years ago)

A lot of my opinions in this thread really boils down to "I've disliked Iron Man and the Avengers since I was five years old and I enjoy them now because Marvel portray them in a way that capitalizes on the fact that a huge chunk of the audience thinks they are total dicks."

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Saturday, 20 January 2007 00:46 (eighteen years ago)

where are you getting yr information abt "a huge chunk of the audience" thinking that Iron Man and the Avengers are "total dicks"???

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Saturday, 20 January 2007 01:06 (eighteen years ago)

1) I think getting my wang caught in a zipper while it's being gnawed on by starved piranha is better than the majority of INFINITE CRISIS wrought. (Apologies to Dan.)

2) I think the same about CIVIL WAR, tho.

3) You're being kinda glib about what IC actually brought about; even if IC concerned itself, ultimately, w/ fleshing out the fringes of the DCU, CIVIL WAR seems deadset on giving the core of the MU a nice wedgie.

4) Your last post makes a whoooole lot of seemingly off-base presumptions. (hi Ward!)

5) Sore throats blow.

David R. (popshots75`), Saturday, 20 January 2007 01:07 (eighteen years ago)

It's an assumption, a hunch, yeah, but one I definitely suspect is part of why the Avengers has suddenly done quite well for itself post-Ultimates. It seems rather plausible that a lot of the extra fans who started reading those books in recent years are there in part because they appreciate the characters being portrayed in a way that confirms what they'd always suspected of them. Most of the comics readers now grew up reading the X books and Image stuff, you know?

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Saturday, 20 January 2007 14:54 (eighteen years ago)

I mean, Mark Millar has made an entire career out of projecting his deep cynicism on his characters, and it only seems logical that his books sell so well because he's giving the readers something that they want, and something a fair percentage of them agree with.

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Saturday, 20 January 2007 14:55 (eighteen years ago)

I agree about most negative points about the execution of Civil War, but I think it did more good for the characters in the long run

hindsight, evaluation (kit brash), Sunday, 21 January 2007 04:30 (eighteen years ago)

Ugh, I write these things too quickly. "Will do more good."

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Sunday, 21 January 2007 20:29 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, dudes - THE RETURN?

From the preview I spied - this guy.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 06:37 (eighteen years ago)

I guess that's a spoiler, even though the book came out yesterday, & no one really cares?

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:12 (eighteen years ago)

Man, they can't leave anyone be. Maybe he'll form the new All-Winners Squad with Alternate Universe Uncle Ben, Gwen Stacy Clone, and Actual Bucky. (... and Jean Grey, come to think of it.)

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:23 (eighteen years ago)

Marvel's overall publishing strategy seems to be 'back to the 70s', not in terms of their storytelling style but in terms of the properties they're pushing: Cap, Iron Man, Hulk, Power Man and Iron Fist, now This Guy, Ms Marvel, Avengers, Shang-Chi's in a book somewhere isn't he?

These were the brands and properties which lost heat while the X-Men gained it, but after 3 movies, countless games etc. the X-Men are a pretty exhausted brand and so the company's pulling back and widening the focus. Like Claremont never happened!

Also I think the storytelling tone now is more 70s than 80s - a bit edgy, a bit anti-establishment and paranoid, more Gerber and Englehart than Shooter and Harras - and Civil War is a key step in moving Marvel back in that direction.

Reading back again this all seems rly obvious, but I'm posting it anyway!

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:26 (eighteen years ago)

Ha - the romp through Spidey's 1970's rogue gallery (Stegron! Man-Wolf! SWARM!) & She-Hulk's revival count, too. Maybe even Hulk's space romp! (&, yeah, Shang-Chi is in H2H.)

WE WANT BROTHER VOODOO (tho I think he showed up in a book, too)! I MEAN NIGHT NURSE! I MEAN DEVIL DINOSAUR!

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:31 (eighteen years ago)

Plus the Champions -- didn't they say or imply early on that Civil War was going to lead to a Champions reunion/revamp? (Not that I'd be against this, the characters make for a Defenders-esque interesting combination now.) And Moon Knight's back! And John Jameson's wolfy alter ego!

I would suspect some of this was coincidental before it became part of a deliberate strategy -- a natural consequence of writers coming up who'd grown up with certain characters and styles (Bendis's affection for Luke Cage and Jessica Drew is the most obvious example).

I'd be all for a revival of Marvel's wacky, mystical, and monster properties, especially these days when I don't think too many of them would be done Vertigo-style.

xpost; seriously, I had a Stegron proposal that I never got around to reworking after House of M made it impossible

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:35 (eighteen years ago)

I'd definitely count the Hulk's space-romp, yeah, good call. It's very much a return to the most popular/resonant/memorable bits of pre-PAD Hulk.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:37 (eighteen years ago)

Tom I don't think it's that obvious - or at least, you put it very well

Englehart's 'Secret Empire' storyline in Captain America (wherein it's strongly hinted that Richard Nixon is the evil mastermind out to discredit Cap) was obv. a response to post-Viet Nam blues/disillusionment, and Civil War is equally a post 9-11 comic

Ward Fowler (Ward Fowler), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:39 (eighteen years ago)

I think it's a pretty good strategy (and as Tep says, it does come naturally out of an editorial generation's childhoods) - I like the fact that it doesn't seem to be based on rejection of the 80s/90s stuff, it's more an organic shift in emphsasis.

Even if THE RETURN is by most accounts a right turkey.

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:41 (eighteen years ago)

I'd be all for a revival of Marvel's wacky, mystical, and monster properties, especially these days when I don't think too many of them would be done Vertigo-style.

Marvel Monster Line to thread! (I think only David and I were reading this in floppies)

http://www.amazon.com/Marvel-Monsters-TPB-Steve-Niles/dp/0785118934/ref=pd_lpo_k2_dp_k2a_1_txt/002-7037895-0280817

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 25 January 2007 14:51 (eighteen years ago)

Oh, I read Fin Fang Four! For some reason I didn't realize there were others. Devil Dinosaur, awesome.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:04 (eighteen years ago)

Which one had the Eric Powell cover? I bought that for fifty cents several months back and really enjoyed, but obviously not enough to remember almost anything about it.

barefoot manthing (Garrett Martin), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:07 (eighteen years ago)

Eric Powell did Devil Dinosaur. I think Bombu was my favourite.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:16 (eighteen years ago)

They all had Powell covers! But FFF was the best of the lot by far. &, yeah, EP was on the interiors for DD (thanx to my bro in conspicuous consumption for the 411).

BTW, there's MORE Monster fun coming soon - Man-Thing, Werewolf By Night, & MORE(bius)!

Even all the cosmic shenanigans going on of late (& an actualy new NOVA series) prob. have their root in this 70s revival, as (IIRC) the 70s were Marvel's most cosmic times (FINALLY all that LSD kicked in - thanx, Mantis).

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

Even the Punisher's potrayal in WAR JOURNAL - hell, even his interaction w/ spandex folks w/out throwing a lol @ spandex bitchfit like when Ennis was on the keys - is throwbacky. (Tho, if the bitchfits being had @ the scans_daily LJ are any indication, some folks are really fond of the "realistic" Ennis take on El Punno.)

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:22 (eighteen years ago)

For what it's worth, scans_daily folk were also bitching about FRAZIER IRVING, so clearly they're three sheets to the WTF.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:25 (eighteen years ago)

I'm a fan of Ennis' take on Frank Castle, certainly, but it's possibly more because he manages to rein beck the MANLOVE and HAHA I GROSS YOU OUT tendencies in his work while still getting to play up the LET'S FUCK SHIT UP aspects.

PWJ is a lot of fun though, particularly Cap's unreserved admiration for him.

aldo_cowpat (aldo_cowpat), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:32 (eighteen years ago)

Nova was a lot better than I expected it to be! (Despite the Nova Corps or whatever it's called being such a blatant rip on the Green Lantern Corps.) I was afraid Annihilation would let me down, but that was a lot of fun. I'll definitely check out the new series.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:40 (eighteen years ago)

after 3 movies, countless games etc. the X-Men are a pretty exhausted brand

Hasn't this been kind of true forever? Or at least for a half-decade up until the first movie/Grant Morrison's New X-Men.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:44 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, it's not like diff. interpretations of the dude can't co-exist, and I'm pretty sure PWJ isn't going to make Ennis' ongoing work suddenly obsolete. Tho there's prob. evidence (on this very thread!) of me going off-the-wall re: folks (MILLAR) playing fast & loose w/ characters I like, so get yr salt while you can.

[xpost]

Yeah, I'm liking ANNIHILATION lots, but the Nova book was the one that disappointed me the most, tho I can't really pinpoint why. Maybe it was all the Richard Rider / computer in his brane interplay bugging me, I'm not sure. Abnett & Lanning could def. do something fun w/ this (see LEGION), but they've been meh-ing me of late (see MAJESTIC & some awful fill-in work), so I'm actually going to abstain. Unless the 4-page preview changes my mind. Or, you know, the sun rises. (Also, "superstar Sean Chen"???? From the pages of RAI & THE FUTURE FORCE? Come on, folx!)

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

The half-decade up to the first movie was, what, 96-01? They were at a fairly low creative ebb then for sure but so was the whole industry - they were still topping the sales charts.

(Also this was the era of the successful cartoon, wasn't it?)

Tom (Groke), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:46 (eighteen years ago)

I thought the cartoon was successful in the early 90s - I think I remember the series getting lots of play (w/ the Spidey cartoons) back when I was still in high school.

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 15:56 (eighteen years ago)

I'm getting my impressions from reading Paul O'Brien's reviews, which actually have been going on about 'oh jesus another miniseries that nobody wants' for a long time - in fact over the last five years as well. The impression I get (perhaps wrongly) is that anything that went well in the X-Men world wasn't related to other media - that the comics at the time the first movie came out were reaching new heights of continuity-strangled incomprehensibility, and successes are due to New X-Men actually figuring out what worked about the movie two years later and getting Claremont back in his sunset days. In other words, they came from within the industry, and through it all, they've continued pumping out lots of comics that no-one in their right mind would buy, and yet people kept buying them.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:01 (eighteen years ago)

I definitely saw the pilot for the first X-Men cartoon in 1993. (I remember TV shows by what television I watched them on, and I only lived in Kansas City for two months.) That was the one that didn't last long and was soon replaced by the one with Jubilee in it instead of Kitty Pryde.

I liked the computerbrane stuff least in Nova, but I don't know, something about it I just dug. Though Drax was better, Drax was kind of awesome.

Tep (ktepi), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:02 (eighteen years ago)

(I'm not entirely clear what my point is, possibly that the X-universe's fortunes are unrelated to what might be waxing or waning in the rest of Marvel)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:04 (eighteen years ago)

I still heart the Drax mini the best out of all the ANNIHILATION shenanigans. If they go & make the girl into some Galactus herald, I'm going to be very disappointed.

As for X-movie synergy / revitalization: back when Marvel was fond of the 25 Cent Issue gimmick, they discounted an issue of Chuck Austen's X-Men to coincide w/ the release of X2. Said issue was first part of the fiasco where Nightcrawler was supposed to destroy the Catholic Church, I believe, which I think says it all (tho, like Andrew, I'm not really sure what it says).

David R. (popshots75`), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:13 (eighteen years ago)

Haha that's brilliant, particularly since the movie's Nightcrawler was the closest to the X-men comic's emoness. It's like, he's this bridge, and then they burned him?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:17 (eighteen years ago)

I remember TV shows by what television I watched them on, and I only lived in Kansas City for two months.

This is going to be the first line in my Jim Thompson pastiche novel.

Huk-L (Huk-L), Thursday, 25 January 2007 16:57 (eighteen years ago)

That first X-Men pilot with Kitty Pryde was from 1989, but TV stations would air it every now and then for years. The cartoon series with Jubilee started in 1992.

The Yellow Kid (The Yellow Kid), Thursday, 25 January 2007 21:26 (eighteen years ago)

I BAKED YOU A THEORY...BUT I EATED IT:

(POSSIBLY CONTAINS MSG OR OTHER SPOILERS)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.


Uatu or Dr. Strange created the anomaly to bring Mar-Vell to the present because he'd change Hari Seldon's Reed Richards' equations. With the new info, Reed will be able to claim "oh ok, now that Marv's here, the world's not going to end after all. Call off the legislators!"

do i have to draw you a diaphragm (Rock Hardy), Friday, 26 January 2007 22:44 (eighteen years ago)

possibly that the X-universe's fortunes are unrelated to what might be waxing or waning in the rest of Marvel

Well, it's a little of both. They definitely used a bit of the strength from the X-books (ie, Wolverine) to launch New Avengers and make House Of M what it was. But it seems like Marvel is making an effort to build up its other franchises in order to make them ripe for film adaptations, spin-offs, etc. I think they were spending so much time pimping Spidey and X-books for so long that they had underdeveloped a whole bunch of characters who have a lot of potential for success in the comics marketplace, and in licensing, which is where the company gets its big money. Quesada and Bendis have been pretty open about the fact that the company is making an effort to build up new and pre-existing characters with an eye towards making them fixtures of the universe -- Echo, The Sentry, The Runaways and New Avengers, that whole deal with The Hood.

M Perpetua (mperpetua), Friday, 26 January 2007 23:22 (eighteen years ago)

three weeks pass...
Yikes. Was this thing running SO late that no one had the chance to explain to Mark Millar that doing a "I knew ____, ____ was a friend of mine, and you sir are no _____" joke is in no way cool or funny or timely in the 2007s?

Mr. Perpetua, Thursday, 22 February 2007 15:20 (eighteen years ago)

Well............. that whole thing was fun I guess. Definitely soured on it as it went on, skipped deadlines, and the already-shaky continuity between main book and crossover issues got completely wrecked. TERRIBLE last issue. And what was even the point of the stupid Captain Mar-vell side issue? He doesn't do anything at all for the story! Major dud in the end sadly. Art is fabulous throughout and there are some killer 'moments' and I stand by most of the positive things I said upthread - I really do think there's potential to get some good stories out of the new status quo, same as the way outing Daredevil opened up all kinds of possibilities in his title - but the "event" itself turned into a disappointment.

Doctor Casino, Saturday, 24 February 2007 18:20 (eighteen years ago)

Yeah, ultimately Civil War was a crap story that set up the possibility for some pretty good smaller stories. Which, I guess, is the entire point of these sort of event miniseries. Have any of them been good stories in their own right? I really don't think so. And I will slap you if you say Crisis on Infinite Earths.

Mr. Perpetua, Sunday, 25 February 2007 22:40 (eighteen years ago)

Invasion was really good: it had a clear premise (aliengs invade Earth, are beaten) and two behind-the-scenes purposes that actually got carried out: to establish various long-standing alien races of the DCU as being current, including their basic natures and tendencies; and to come up with a generic hand-wavey excse for superpowers. The former may not have been followed up on much, but they certainly did the job with an entire issue of Meet The Aliens. And I guess the latter probably fell by the wayside with subsequent zillions of reboots, but it was a really good bit of handwaving in the classic DC pseudoscience manner, and was not only done well in the series but also gave a good excuse for drama-creating oh-noes-my-powers-are-playing-up flimflam in the regular books.

The format was great, too - all the heavy lifting was done in the enormous core issues, so that a) it only took up two issues of any given title, and b) each crossover issue was free to jump straight in with first FITEING ALIUMS and then mopping up the aftermath OH WAIT IT'S NOT OVER negative page. And the invasion itself wasn't done stupidly - establish a beachhead*, make other incursions and let skirmishes happen where each writer needs or doesn't need then. Gave an excuse for superheroes to actually band together with central organisation, as opposed to "the sky has turned green! let's punch it" happening independently in 20 different comics.

*It really bothered me that there was never any followup about Australia being totally destroyed and stuff later on, that it just got better! Nice of Giffen to actually address this in Dominion like 12 years later, but he fumbled it badly obv. (Not that I cared anymore by then, I'd, y'know, gone through puberty and so forth.)

energy flash gordon, Monday, 26 February 2007 05:11 (eighteen years ago)

Another good story-as-story: The Final Night. Absolutely NO long-term impact on the wider DCU, no setup for anything else, just an opportunity to tell a story which pretty much had to be done as a crossover (because if the sun's gone out in one title, let's face it, it's gone out in all of them). And it was a good story, too, it holds up even now the ostensible point of it (give Hal Jordan's heroic career a fitting conclusion) has long been retconned.

Groke, Monday, 26 February 2007 09:49 (eighteen years ago)

As for Civil War, I thought Paul O Brien's take on it in this week's X-Axis was a fair summary of what went wrong with it.

Also, given that it came out over 10 months anyway, it really could have been a 10-issue series with some of the more key plot threads from the crossovers (Speedball's story, Aunt May getting shot, Iron Man as war profiteer) folded in (and the robot Thor clone folded out!).

Groke, Monday, 26 February 2007 09:55 (eighteen years ago)

Not that I cared anymore by then, I'd, y'know, gone through puberty and so forth.

This is our Mission Statement, surely.

aldo, Monday, 26 February 2007 10:00 (eighteen years ago)

I like the Thanos crossovers but, like "Final Night" (which I enjoyed too, a bit lowkey for a crossover tho) they left no real marks on continuity at large. "Secret Wars" was good, too.

Daniel_Rf, Monday, 26 February 2007 16:34 (eighteen years ago)

four months pass...

CIVIL REPERCUSSIONS:

- Warren Ellis has Penance ineffectually banging his head against a brick wall while Bullseye gets sonned by D-list superguy (awesome)
- Punisher's (temporary?) new outfit cheeses off internet dinks (awesome)
- Spider-Man + JMS = WHINY LIKE CANNED HEAT SINGER (not awesome)
- Iron Man abuses terms like "pardon" and "registration" the way 24's Jack Bauer whips out "perimeter" & "damn it" (nooooooo)
- Captain America: STILL DEAD (yeah, sure)
- Black Goliath of Ebon Largess: STILL DEAD (lucky bastard)
- Captain Marvel: NO ONE CARES (w00t)
- Hulk & his warbound FTW (oh hell yes)

David R., Wednesday, 11 July 2007 17:56 (eighteen years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.