Another one is 'you're drunk' - which, I think, is quite a patronising response to someone saying things at you that you don't want to hear but even though you're right that they are drunk. I mean, it is patronising but it's also quite often true but the fact that it's patronising causes negates that truth and loses you the moral high ground.
What rhetorical flourishes (I can't think of a better word right now, it's hot) do you like to use and what ones frustrate you much?
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:08 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:17 (twenty-two years ago)
[Oi Archel - there are other threads for general gripes about crappy phrases.]
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:19 (twenty-two years ago)
I switch off when telesales/customer service people start using phrases they obviously have on a piece of paper in front of them to deal with whatever you have to say, especially if it's negative. Especially when they use the anti-aggression script. I didn't call *you* to shout at you, you called me. I can shout all I like.
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alex in Rotherham (Alex in Doncaster), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:27 (twenty-two years ago)
"At the end of the day" is annoying I guess, I'm sure I say it all the time though, I am more a fan of "the long and short of it is".
Going back to the topic, I agree that "You're drunk" and "grow up" are fairly snappy beatdowns. "Grow up" when used by youngish people, generally just means "shut up", usually used when someone is trying to make a point or be passionate. I presume everyone else hates those people who will interrupt a civil but animated argument by saying "oh come on, grow up both of you" or "ok thats enough" etc etc.
I've only heard "you're drunk" from my mother, a few months ago she said "you're drunk, i seriously think you may be an alcoholic", I laughed oafishly cos I was drunk. Can't remember any friends hitting me with "you're drunk", they'd probably just cut to the chase and say "shut up Ronan".
Which is definitely fairer, I'd treat them with the same respect.
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:29 (twenty-two years ago)
Threads for general gripes about useless phrases:
Most irritating cliche/phrase/expressionFour Words: Use Other Words Please"Taking Things to a Whole `Nother Level!"Commonly used phrases that inexplicably bug youUse other phrases please
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:30 (twenty-two years ago)
...but he was OLDER and IMPOSSIBLY COOL, so he had no right to get self-consciously mentally-clammed up.
― Alex in Rotherham (Alex in Doncaster), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:32 (twenty-two years ago)
I think, actually, you've right to feel hurt when someone replies 'you're patronising me' after you state they're drunk because arguing with drunks (irrational, frustrated, angry) is the worst conversation you can have. It's one of the rare situations where being reasonable escalates the argument rather than calms it, I think.
I'm trying to think of others here.
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:34 (twenty-two years ago)
'Calm down'
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)
retro: 'i am your teacher, do your parents allow you to speak like this". how sorry I am for speaking my mind, what a terrible job mum and dad have done.
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:43 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:45 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:57 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 09:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)
― The Lady Ms Lurex (lucylurex), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:00 (twenty-two years ago)
'yeah its cool man, we're just in different places man, essentially we agree really"
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:03 (twenty-two years ago)
Ronan, when you've been around as long as I have, you develop a good sense for this kind of thing.
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:05 (twenty-two years ago)
David, people say it cos they don't have any direct or sensible retort to something someone's said and so instead of simply saying "I have no logical position for what I think" they say "yeah I am venerable and I may not have a clue but this is due to many years of struggle".
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:08 (twenty-two years ago)
Like, HOW DOES THAT FUCKING WORK YOU CUNTING COCKFARMER?!
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:10 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:14 (twenty-two years ago)
God, this makes me fume. Of course, the accusation of defensiveness is one you have to take pretty seriously in a work situation where you're expected to bow to the greater experience/knowledge of yr superiors and swallow any temptation to counter criticism with an explanation of yr actions.
The more rigorous and keenly-argued your explanation (there's a reason I did this, and you should know it before slapping me down; in fact, if you see the chain of logic that got me to this point, it may demonstrate a hole in my training, or some other deeper misapprehension on my part) the greater the danger of being earmarked as 'defensive' or 'attitudinal'.
But maybe it's 'good for the soul' (hey, that's another one!) to just shut up and take it sometimes.
― Michael Jones (MichaelJ), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:16 (twenty-two years ago)
nick: did you listen to a word I just said?richard: you're drunk. no, I didn't.
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:17 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Thursday, 7 August 2003 10:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 11:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 11:32 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 11:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 7 August 2003 11:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 12:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Thursday, 7 August 2003 12:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 12:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Thursday, 7 August 2003 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 12:54 (twenty-two years ago)
― N. (nickdastoor), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)
― Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:14 (twenty-two years ago)
ok...i'll TAKE YOURS
― Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― RickyT (RickyT), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 13:58 (twenty-two years ago)
Um, no this has never happened to me, no sir.
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:01 (twenty-two years ago)
(Ideally said upon giving someone else a really hard time and getting a predictably annoyed reaction)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Matt (Matt), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Larcole (Nicole), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:24 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:26 (twenty-two years ago)
― Larcole (Nicole), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:28 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Larcole (Nicole), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:36 (twenty-two years ago)
By the way, I'm living my dream, and I hope that really bothers you.
― Larcole (Nicole), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:38 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:39 (twenty-two years ago)
― rosemary (rosemary), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:41 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:43 (twenty-two years ago)
Reminds me of this e-mail I got this morning from some clown who pretty much said the same thing to me. He really DID have nothing better to do that go on about people who think he was a poor writer (which he was and is) as opposed to improving what he does.
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:46 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:48 (twenty-two years ago)
― RJG (RJG), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mandee, Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:52 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mandee, Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:53 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:56 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Thursday, 7 August 2003 14:59 (twenty-two years ago)
Every conversation ever in college, apart from the pitchfork.
― Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 7 August 2003 15:21 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ally (mlescaut), Thursday, 7 August 2003 15:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Aimless, Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:15 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:19 (twenty-two years ago)
'why are you getting so defensive?' - what? i'm sorry, i don't speak 'wanker'...
'why are you getting so defensive?' - why are you talking like a pseudo-telepathic freudian hippie smuggins?
'why are you getting so defensive?'- why are you projecting your defensiveness onto me? (HA!)
best answer to any version of this kind of i'm-dead-empathic-me closed-system attribution-of-motives/feelings freudlite-wankyness is to reflect it back:
'you're projecting''no, YOU'RE projecting''no, YOU are projecting..'etcetc'
(unless of course you actually are arguing with another cinema projectionist about whose shift it is)
― Snowy Mann (rdmanston), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:35 (twenty-two years ago)
― David. (Cozen), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:40 (twenty-two years ago)
Me: 'Why, because it's really fun to go to gay bars and pick up hott men? Yeah, no way would I want my worst enemy to do that or enjoy it.'
― suzy (suzy), Thursday, 7 August 2003 16:45 (twenty-two years ago)
You're taking this really personally.
Get over "it."
Can't you see how paranoid that sounds?
(and my favorite)
"I guess you're always right, huh?"
― jackson anderville, Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:18 (twenty-two years ago)
― Tracer Hand (tracerhand), Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― jackson anderville, Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― amateurist (amateurist), Thursday, 7 August 2003 20:32 (twenty-two years ago)
"you must be very proud of yourself!!!!"
"SATISFIED??????"
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 8 August 2003 00:40 (twenty-two years ago)
I used to know a guy who shrugged off everything anyone ever said about anything by saying, "Six of one, half a dozen of the other." He said this about ANYTHING, regardless of whether the alternatives being offered could even remotely be construed as equal -- and even if you weren't offering alternatives. "Hey, Jim, would you please stop sucking your teeth?" "Six of one, half a dozen of the other." HUH?
― jewelly (jewelly), Friday, 8 August 2003 01:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― Asymmetric Cocktails (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 8 August 2003 02:30 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 8 August 2003 02:31 (twenty-two years ago)
― Asymmetric Cocktails (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 8 August 2003 02:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― electric sound of jim (electricsound), Friday, 8 August 2003 02:44 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 8 August 2003 10:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Mark C (Mark C), Friday, 8 August 2003 10:34 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 8 August 2003 10:55 (twenty-two years ago)
― Alan (Alan), Friday, 8 August 2003 11:12 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sam (chirombo), Friday, 8 August 2003 11:25 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Friday, 8 August 2003 11:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 8 August 2003 12:19 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Friday, 8 August 2003 12:22 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah McLusky (coco), Friday, 8 August 2003 12:48 (twenty-two years ago)
"you can't say that though, you can't say it"
― Ronan (Ronan), Friday, 8 August 2003 12:50 (twenty-two years ago)
― Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Friday, 8 August 2003 12:56 (twenty-two years ago)
me: no, I have never seen that one.
my girlfriend: yes, you have! we watched it last week!
me: no, we didn't; I have never, ever seen it.
my girlfriend: [laughing] yes, you have.
me: I don't remember ANY of the parts you describe--I have never seen it.
my girlfriend: [smiling] you have.
me: you can't say that.
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 8 August 2003 13:01 (twenty-two years ago)
― Sarah MCLusky (coco), Friday, 8 August 2003 13:04 (twenty-two years ago)
me: you must realise you cannot say that!!!!
― RJG (RJG), Friday, 8 August 2003 13:06 (twenty-two years ago)
I hope you'll all approve of people saying things like "You'll understand when you get to my age," or "of course, you're still very young," as attempts to claim special wisdom. I am generally the oldest here, so I don't want these banned. (Damn, wrote this when I started reading the thread, and this tactic is attacked. I have nothing left!)
― Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Friday, 8 August 2003 16:29 (twenty-two years ago)
― Prude (Prude), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 04:40 (twenty-two years ago)
― Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 04:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 13 August 2003 06:36 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:23 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:33 (twenty-two years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:37 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:43 (twenty-two years ago)
"Say it in English, please!" "when you get to my age" or "if you were as old as me""Engaging""You're just saying that"* "NOW do you agree with me?"* "You think you're SO smart!"* "Now let's just play devil's advocate here...""I hope you're happy now!!""you must be very proud of yourself!!!!""SATISFIED??????" "Lighten up!"
I could go on, but I'm tired of scrolling. And I'm sure each of these things is perhaps irritating to the person who mentioned them. So what? Does this mean that the people who say these things (which includes in many cases almost everyone BESIDES the person who finds them irritating) are somehow stupid or ridiculous? Are there really people going around making snap judgements about people based on whether or not they use the phrase "you're just saying that" as rhetoric? If I say such things, can I no longer be your friend? What on earth is the point of this thread?
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:49 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:51 (twenty-two years ago)
Same goes for everything else here. Suppose you ARE full of shit. Suppose, just for a moment, that you're being an arrogant ass and you DESERVE to be told "You think you're so smart!" Or maybe you're just saying that. If I tell you that you're just saying that, I'm not wrong.
Words have a time and a place. If they're often misused, that's unavoidable, but it's hardly the words' fault.
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:57 (twenty-two years ago)
For example if you're discussing something with someone and you make a point and they say "lighten up" then the discussion can't go anywhere, hence it is potentially an annoying rhetorical flourish.
Of course this isn't cut and dried and from situation to situation all the above phrases could be ok, but that's surely obvious and to deliberately ignore that makes you a bit more guilty of what you're accusing people here of doing than anyone, as far as I see.
If you read the thread you'd notice lots of people agreeing that "yes that is irritating" after a few of the examples you give.
Do you actually believe anyone actually is as histrionic as your last few lines?
The thread says "rhetorical flourishes you can't stand", people listed rhetorical flourishes they can't stand. It's pretty simple really and you're the only one showing any undue anger.
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 07:59 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:03 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:05 (twenty-two years ago)
haha "it's all so unqualifiable" = my own new irritating phrase now to shut ppl up, it's brilliant
― mark s (mark s), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:05 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:07 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:13 (twenty-two years ago)
― Kenan Hebert (kenan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:14 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:20 (twenty-two years ago)
― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:47 (twenty-two years ago)
― Justyn Dillingham (Justyn Dillingham), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 08:58 (twenty-two years ago)
― Nick Southall (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 09:03 (twenty-two years ago)
I was worried about diluting thread creep when I first posted (in response to Archel's suggestion) but by and large I think people have kept to the topic. It's *not* about which phrases or clichés are irritating per se. It's about stock phrases that are used to score points in an argument, or yes, as Ronan says, shut it down.
We probably do all use these, but they are the nasty side of rhetoric. And if overused they (thankfully) lose their power.
The constructive side of this thread is that by pointing them out and ridiculing them, we are less likely to be cowed next time someone says "grow up" or "I've got better things to be doing than sit and argue with you all day". And hopefully more productive argument will ensue.
― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 13 August 2003 10:51 (twenty-two years ago)
― dave q, Wednesday, 13 August 2003 11:02 (twenty-two years ago)
― cozen (Cozen), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 11:34 (twenty years ago)
'Meh, it's all subjective/relative anyway'. Occasionally true but never helpful.
'WhatEVER'. Best rhetorical flourish ever and I have no problem with it at all.
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:01 (twenty years ago)
― Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:56 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:57 (twenty years ago)
"haha, yeah, your mum"
only way to return a childish argument is to out-childish it.
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:58 (twenty years ago)
― ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 12:59 (twenty years ago)
Which was odd, because although I'm old I'm not that old and his film heyday, such as it was, must have been 40 years previously.
― Bidfurd, Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:20 (twenty years ago)
― Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:28 (twenty years ago)
― Alba (Alba), Tuesday, 2 August 2005 13:36 (twenty years ago)