I don't understand the "This is the thread where I say..." threads.

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Why do people post to these threads? I find them excruciating to read (and hence haven't for a long, long time) and can't really understand people's urges to post to them.

Now, obviously these threads just aren't for me. I'm just curious as to what the allure is. Also, what goes on in them these days? I had a quick glance through the most recent one and it looked pretty-much the same as in the beginning.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It's the ILX locker room. We talk about who we've banged and compare wangs.

Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:18 (twenty-one years ago)

notably, we're all 2-inch virgins.

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Like the rest of ILE, people just talk about whatever. Unlike the rest of ILE, people are generally polite.

xpost: Huck is more of a 5cm virgin, but yeah.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:22 (twenty-one years ago)

its like the mongrels sheepfuxors thread? not really meant to be read so much as participated in.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Both the This is and the Mongrel/Sheepfuxor threads function as communities within a community, and notably they make their way along without much disrupting them. A parallel might be to the legendary Nas/Jay-Z thread runs on ILM, except there a slew of outsiders came to argue and then came to stay, almost solely esconced in their own spot. Here, meanwhile, regulars (and past regulars) responded to two separate moments of inspiration that took on lives on their own.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:31 (twenty-one years ago)

gidday Ned!

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Dude the Nas and Jay-Z thread was way better, no offense or anything.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

a winner is you, ally.

the surface noise (slight return) (electricsound), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Unlike the rest of ILE, people are generally polite.

Apparently.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

*bows* No qualitative comparison was implied.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

G'day Ally, Jim, Spence

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)

The TITTWIS threads are just supposed to be basic "hey, this is how I'm doing" threads, a place where people don't have to worry about being Cooler Than Thou, exceedingly knowledgable about things, or super-impressive. That's why the TITTWIS threads are always my favorite threads around.

Some have complained of there being a clique around this thread series, when there really isn't. I think we TITTWISers can all safely say that we encourage more people to come into the TITTWIS fray and never wish to become some sort of closed-door club, exclusive to all but a few. Really, anyone who is willing to participate in a thread that doesn't seek to prove anything or impart any sort of advanced cultural knowledge is welcome.

You know, the thread isn't even geographically specific. The "mongrels sheepfuxors" thread is a perfectly fine one because obv the Oceania contingency here have the right to communicate in a way the residents of those two countries would be able to understand, with all the regional lingo and references and all, but sometimes various bits of this forum get incredibly geographically specific to the point where if you don't live in a specific part of the U.S. or UK, you can't see how in the world you can work yourself into the thread. The TITTWIS threads transcend that.

I love TITTWIS, even when I can't find the time to keep up with it the way I'd like to. I welcome as many people as possible to it.

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)

we should have a barbie Dee! the TITTWIS regulars and the mongrel fuxors.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Doesn't Ned somewhat participate in both?

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:42 (twenty-one years ago)

A barbie at Neds place!

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)

*laugh* I can't even begin to imagine what the Barbies for those two thread series would be like. Still, very good idea, gaz.

(xpost) Chris -- yeah, he does. Yay for Ned the Flexible!

(Oh wait. That doesn't mean... that.)

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Like I said, it's no offense, I'm pretty sure it's impossible to be better than the Nas/Jay-Z threads. MAYBE the Madonna fight was as good a thread. But they're kind of like the pantheon of thread excellence to be enjoyed by all.

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Yo Spencer, this weekend?

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Then there's also the 'Try Glasgow More' thread isn't there? I must admit to the guilty pleasure of reading these threads just for the pleasure of eavesdropping into conversational smalltalk from another place far far away.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but it might be pretty late on friday.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I still don't get it. "A place where people don't have to worry about being Cooler Than Thou?" In which thread are people trying to be cooler than thou? It sure as hell ain't any starring myself, gabbneb, roger, or rasheed counting electoral votes. Because that sure as hell ain't cooler than thou.

Barbies?

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:51 (twenty-one years ago)

sherry, Pleasant?

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:53 (twenty-one years ago)

My only problem with those threads (which I don't read at all) is that some of the people who do participate in them always have to critique the rest of ILE as some big-bad scary place that they need to protect themselves from or something.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, also "cleverer than thou". I mean, nothing against the electoral threads, of course, but I believe there's an element of "knowing your shit" in those threads, and that doesn't exist in the "lounge" threads.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

It's basically an ongoing FAPPY kinda thing for people in the same locale. Mutual local gossip is also shared, and we talk about what was on TV etc. It's a slightly different atmosphere, track dax and timtams and feet on the table, rather than neatly pressed shirt and cutlery. Casuistry's 'lounge thead' idea is very apt.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure "scary" is quite the critique being made.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I should be more specific - I'm not talking about the mongrel/sheep threads at all (I know very little about those but what I do know sounds like fun).

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 02:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"A place where people don't have to worry about being Cooler Than Thou?"

you certainly couldn't include "Try Glasgow More" in this group.

jed_ (jed), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I should also point out that I do in fact like many of the people that (I think) post to the "This is the..." threads.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm equally disinterested in the Mongrels/Sheepfuxor threads, even though I'm a Mongrel myself. I've tried participating before but I guess I just don't care enough to expend the effort.

Here are a few (but not the only) threads on the New Answers page at the moment which I regard as 'my type' of ilx thread:

I don't understand the "This is the thread where I say..." threads. (obviously)
ZORK
Beyond cheap
KNowing you've done something wrong, and waiting to be dealt with...
Why don't you do drugs?
Michael Douglas:The Angriest White Man?
Hatred of Itunes
Go!!
What is the single greatest compliment you've ever recieved?

As you can probably see from that list, I'm not much into the conversational or cliquey threads. I guess I get enough "hey how you doin'? that's nice" and real-life drama stuff in my life offline.

My only problem with those threads (which I don't read at all) is that some of the people who do participate in them always have to critique the rest of ILE as some big-bad scary place that they need to protect themselves from or something.

OTM.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:03 (twenty-one years ago)

i am going to imagine you in trackdax every time we meet on the mongrel thread col. it is not a pleasant thought.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Afore these threads appeared, I get the impression many of you got together for AIM chats. Which is fine, except injoke references were made to them later in ILX threads, sometimes with a "you had to be there" tone.

And yes, some people do sometimes give off a "youre not doing it right" vibe that might engender the creation of threads like these - some comments on this thread are perhaps a good example of that.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, saying things like "is that some of the people who do participate in them always have to critique the rest of ILE as some big-bad scary place that they need to protect themselves from or something" doesnt help people who might feel that way's confidence, FFS.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I always imagine you in that g-string you once mentioned, gaz.

Vive la difference! Different threads for different freds.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:08 (twenty-one years ago)

(FWIW, I dont "read" the mongrels threads - there's whole chunks of 'em Ive missed in the past. I just dip in and blab when I feel like blabbing. Whats the effin' problem?

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:09 (twenty-one years ago)

haha and i just thought you were always stoned!

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:10 (twenty-one years ago)

What the? Why? *pout*

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I just dip in and blab when I feel like blabbing. Whats the effin' problem?

I suppose it's fine just as long as that mentality stays within those type of threads. I guess I should consider it a good thing that these threads exist for people that feel the urge to post anything for the sake of posting (note I'm not condemning this).

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)

i have it on now col!

(wow, i hope those scary guys have gone)

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:12 (twenty-one years ago)

people that feel the urge to post anything for the sake of posting

But that's all of us on every thread! (Well, sorta.)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Small talk is for small minds. I have a small mind. Teehee! I don't know *giggle*, I'm just like that.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:13 (twenty-one years ago)

But that's all of us on every thread! (Well, sorta.)

The best threads I've read on ILX have been populated heavily by people who have an active interest in participating in a thoughtful discussion of an interesting topic.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Now now Col...that should have gone on the "Here's where we post something silly" thread.

xpost

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I recognise that the environment as a whole is probably necessary for those threads to come into existence.

xpost

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

You're being a bit of a fecetious cunt about this Andrew :)

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but as has been mentioned, the "lounge threads" aren't so much for reading as they are for participating in.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Andrew, I agree the most rewarding threasd to read are like those you mentioned. However BOTH kinds can be rewarding to participate in (just like silly and serious conversations)

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

That was a big ol' xpost, responding to Andrew's "the best threads are..." post.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, that's what those threads are about? Maybe I shouldn't have actually posted the lyrics to "Joey" then? Eh.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

A lot of people who were on "pink ILX" had the best day of their life being total retards, throwing the shackles of heavy discourse off.

If light banter don't float yr boat, then fine. Just dont piss in the pool if we're happy paddling in it, k?

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Sundar: oh? I thought you'd posted the words because I'd mentioned the song reminded me of an ex... *shrug* !

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, it can be a mood thing. Or a personality thing. Silly word play, gossiping about local bands and teasing trayce are two of the great pleasures of the Sheepfuxors thread. But I can totally understand if it doesn't float Andrew's boat.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)

three

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

thats three things col.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha!

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I just dont see the value in declaring such threads "excruciating" and saying "it's fine just as long as that mentality stays within those type of threads."

I thought the "haha look at this silly bad code!" thread was impenetrable boring twaddle. I didnt get it. You dont see me whining about it though - it isnt for me, is it?

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Just dont piss in the pool if we're happy paddling in it, k?

Would you fucks stop jumping on the defensive tip. I've gone to great pains in my posts on this thread to state that I'm perfectly fine with the existence of the TITTWIS, Mongrels, etc threads.

Seriously, Trayce, what the fuck?!

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think Andrew was whining Trayce. He was being baffled.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

You should read a bit more closely. I said reading those threads is excruciating. You yourself have said that you've not even read the bulk of them. The "value" in that description is that I was expressing how I feel.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost - gaz is OTM)

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I understand Trayce if you're not into the topic being discussed in any one particular thread. I was just expressing my curiosity about these hugely popular serial threads that have been around as long as I can remember...

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, Andrew was baffled. But he wasn't being aggressive about it, he just didn't get it. Fair enuff I reckon. (x-post)

Actually Andrew, the sheepfuxors thread formed out of a Pseudo Echo thread, funnily enough.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:27 (twenty-one years ago)

OK OK, calm down =) I read your posts as somewhat more than just a question, I have to admit. Perhaps it was simply some of yr wording is all.

Didnt mean to sound defensive (even if I was being). Im just not sure the point of asking "but why do this?" if you dont care why. And it seemed a little like you didnt, really (again, perhaps misreading).

I dont know. I'm flat out working, I shouldnt be flinging me orb about.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, Col not only OTM, but interestingly the TTITWIS threads also began as a specific concept - to write one's current thoughts in italic format, it had an almost poetic feel.

Somehow it morphed.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Now, I will shut up and stop taking my crazy pills.

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:31 (twenty-one years ago)

what's so hard to understand?

gabbneb (gabbneb), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Trayce: I wasn't being 100% serious. I posted them b/c luna said she didn't understand what the song was about and yeah there was some discussion of it, including your comments (which I appreciated). Just that reading this thread, it made it seem like maybe the point of threads like that wasn't actually to discuss what the thread was 'about'.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, heh. Soz. Everything's going over my head today :(

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Nah, you're with it Trayce. Its a weird thread. But hey.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

It kinda reminds me of that card game that they used to play at Governor's School called Mao or Asshole or something like that. The kicker to the game was that you couldn't be told the rules to the game when you played for the first time. You had to learn them as you went along. I hated that game and still don't know what the hell the strategeries were.

sherry, Pleasant?

This isn't one of these things where people *hugs TigerHand* and LOL ROTF, is it?

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I loved Mao! I thought Asshole was a totally different game though.

sundar subramanian (sundar), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I honestly don't remember that much about the "Try Glasgow More" thread, though what I do remember was quite nice. (jed, please take note here. *wink*)

Chris, thank you for better explaining what it was that I meant by my original post. "Well, also 'cleverer than thou'. I mean, nothing against the electoral threads, of course, but I believe there's an element of 'knowing your shit' in those threads, and that doesn't exist in the 'lounge' threads." -- exactly.

Spencer -- maybe it's because you're more well versed in many of the topics that get frequently discussed. I can and do find myself at times unable to contribute a single thing anywhere aside from the "chatty" threads and during those times I become all too aware of how ignorant and out of touch I believe myself to be. And when I'm surrounded by all of these individuals who not only know all this stuff but who are also involved in lives I find to be quite glamorous, it gets to be a bit intimidating.

Andrew, FWIW, I think you're doing an admirable job of explaining that these threads aren't exactly your cup of tea, but that you don't wish to express complete and total disapproval of them. Thanks for that. As the music mole said, "different threads for different freds".

sundar, my memory is complete shit, so I totally didn't remember that it was you who posted the lyrics to "Joey"! Don't worry about doing that, BTW. You did well and it WAS on topic as people WERE discussing the actual song itself and what its possible meaning was. It was a fine contribution. Now please feel free to contribute more to the TITTWIS series!

Pleasant Plains, we won't *hug* you or offer you popcorn or anything like that if you don't want that sort of thing. Deal?

Many Coloured Halo (Dee the Lurker), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Pleasant...i was kind of offering you a drink as a new guest at the bar-b-q. maybe you'd prefer a beer?


xpost

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

But, HOW CAN YOU OFFER ME A BEER WHEN YOU DON'T EVEN LIVE IN THE SAME STATE AS ME?

I do appreciate the sentiment, i suppose.

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

it was symbolic. a kind of greeting. set the scene. like, i don't offer sherries to people who aren't welcome.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah. Keep the XXXX for THOSE people ;)

Trayce (trayce), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:36 (twenty-one years ago)

although if i don't offer you one it doesn't mean you're not welcome...er... if i offer you one you are definitely welcome. and if i don't i am probably drunk and lapse.

Coopers Trayce?

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

What, Queenslanders?

Pleasant Plains (Pleasant Plains), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

That's at least one more X than my comfort zone.

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 04:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I better understand the threads in question now.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 05:22 (twenty-one years ago)

TITTWIS isn't about anything. It started because one night I needed a dumping ground for all the stuff that was in my head, and now it's morphed into something that has very little to do with me. I know they aren't exciting, and that's okay with me, though being called banal because of them and having people feel they're excruciating to read - well, sure, it hits a little close to home, but so be it. I talk a lot of shit, I talk a lot about who I am, a lot about sex, a lot about all kinds of nothing, and I'm sure there are many (not always complimentary) opinions of me . . . whatever, it happens.

I've wondered, however, if it isn't an idea whose time has come... and gone.

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm happy, too, that this merited it's own thread, as opposed to say... oh, I don't know, maybe emailing someone? Me? Yeah.

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

luna, you are not being called banal. I for one value your presence on ilx - I love having you around.

I wasn't aware that the threads themselves were associated with you. I was more interested in having a meta-discussion of an ilx phenomena.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, Luna, although you started the threads and generally initiate them when they change over, the thread has taken a life of its own. I don't think of it as "the threads where Luna says" specifically.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Not now, Andrew - nevermind me, really - I should really let that one go. I don't know, I just feel responsible somehow. ANYWAY, I'm not feeling particularly perky or rational right now, so I'll fuck off to bed.

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:19 (twenty-one years ago)

i dont get them either!

big chaki (chaki), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 06:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I cannot for the life of me believe how certain individuals on here pretend to be ignorant of how ILX = bastion of cooler / cleverer / hipper-than-thou-ism on the internet, due to its very structure and original format. ILM, in particular. Good grief - what next, we're going to pretend we're simply all extended family members posting recipes and reunion pictures back and forth ? (despite some fun attempts to _turn_ ilx into that, it never was or will be...)

Also, I find them excruciating to read doesn't sound terribly tolerant to me, but I hope if this thread was educational, this'll be the _last_ time this old topic is dredged up again...(search for, ahem "banal" in last year's archives)

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I find them excruciating to read doesn't sound terribly tolerant to me

See upthread for my clarification to this.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:26 (twenty-one years ago)

It's really not that hard to understand. ILX in overthinking it shocka. It's either for you, or it isn't. (And I'm not being defensive about it, cause for the most part it really isn't for me, either). Maybe you don't need to "get" or even *gasp* read every thread. I know there's a bunch a threads that I don't know what the fuck is going on in or see the point in. At that point, I click outta the thread and wammo blammo it ceases to exist for me.

Andrew, you may have just started this thread for purely good-natured, investigative reasons, but could you see how you came across a bit brash and condescending? It always makes me chuckle when someone says "why the fuck are you being defensive?" right after they've attacked something.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I mean would it help if a seperate board was started rather than a seperate thread?
Cause I have no idea wtf the noize board is on about, but I don't really care. They're doing their thing over there, and I pay it no mind.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:30 (twenty-one years ago)

didn't envision myself saying this anytime soon but what the hey.... oops OTMFM

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

=)

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:31 (twenty-one years ago)

N01Z3 dud3s are neat, be nice to them!

x j e r e m y (x Jeremy), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Well I participate in the TITTWIS threads & yeah I guess it can be dull if you just hop in & read a small section of it. I know I am coming to this discussion late & Andrew you have already clarified your position of this, but I agree with Vic above and if you don't like the threads, why bother reading them? When you say they are 'excruciating to read' it is difficult not to take offense to this.
x-post

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:47 (twenty-one years ago)

jeremy return to AIM!

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 07:48 (twenty-one years ago)

It is quite amusing how the This Is The Thread Where I Say threads are always first in the firing line where there are at least four of those enclave threads running at any given time. Also the fact that us Londoners have been doing a similar inane chat thing in our FAP threads for years without anyone noticing ;)

I don't post to TITTWIS mostly because I have no particular relationship with most of the people posting there - also there are enough ILX things draining my time as it is.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:14 (twenty-one years ago)

'try glasgow more' is for arranging and there is only one of it and it's cool, so what?

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)

why are you getting defensive? huh *poke* huh *poke poke* huh??

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah. Sorry Andrew, but you're bright enough to understand that insulting people (or, if you prefer, something that is dear to a lot of people and is made up of their contributions) and then saying "hey, I didn't mean it as an insult" just doesn't wash.

Are you worrying that threads like this that you don't understand are spoiling the purity of ILX?

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

fight, to the death.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:47 (twenty-one years ago)

also, if this place isn't gonna start getting censored or whatnot, singling threads out that one thinks is "more interesting" than others on a whole new thread, seems like a waste of time and k-lame. are there invisible standards that thread creators simply aren't meeting these days? if so they should be included in the FAQ

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:51 (twenty-one years ago)

OTM.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:53 (twenty-one years ago)

FWIW i'm not even a member of the TITTWIS community, but am friends with a lot of them outside of that. unsurprisingly i think they happen to be the least scene-y / clique-y, image-oriented foax on ilx, the nice regular people who don't give a toss about keeping up with the latest V V every wednesday

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:54 (twenty-one years ago)

lets give andrew the benefit of the doubt here, eh? i certainly have never found him anything but a gent elsewhere i've encountered him.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:55 (twenty-one years ago)

singling threads out that one thinks is "more interesting" than others

Also, that's N.'s job.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, I find the idea of ILX being somehow pure hilarious. There have always been threads that I don't understand. This is just a phenomena that I thought was worth discussing. I find the examination of ILX itself quite fascinating.

I wasn't trying to insult anybody or anything. I just quite honestly and frankly stated my opinions and perceptions. I think some people's interpretations of my postings say more about those people than me or my intentions.

I thought I was pretty clear from the start, but evidently not. In any case, I hope I've now clarified my perspective on things.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:57 (twenty-one years ago)

What the fuck is your problem Vic? You seem to be deliberately and most selectively interpreting my words to suit some agenda of yours.

At no point have I even considered suggesting that threads should be censored based on topic or content. The only level of discrimination I've levelled in this thread has been stating what is "my type of thread", and what is "not for me". Note that I'm very obviously and deliberately speaking for myself here.

Get off your fucking high horse. It's pathetic.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 08:59 (twenty-one years ago)

why are you, on yours?

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I think some people's interpretations of my postings say more about those people than me or my intentions.

So we're the baddies now? Because you started a thread calling other's postings "excruciating"?? You're just digging deeper.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I like you, Andrew, but a simple apology would have been the best way to respond to people feeling insulted. Obviously you have the threads you like, but really, it was pretty ill-thought out to question the idea of this thread in the way you did.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd be getting infuriated if I were Andrew too (and I pretty much share his views tbh) he made great pains to point out that he wasn't having a go and was curious about the attraction when several poeople have jumped down his throat.

Porkpie (porkpie), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:07 (twenty-one years ago)

So we're the baddies now? Because you started a thread calling other's postings "excruciating"?? You're just digging deeper.

I wasn't aware that there were 'baddies' in this situation. I'm not interested in creating drama or a system of competing factions within ilx. Part of the reason I posted this thread was for that exact reason; I wanted to understand what drew so many regular posters to these threads that I found so hard to comprehend.

I see that posting this thread was a mistake now. Or at least I should've posted it in a less inflammatory way. I'm sorry if I offended anyone. I hope that anyone who was/is offended can read through this whole thread to get a better understanding of my perspective on these things. I'm actually surprised I hadn't explicity apologised before.

I guess I think it's a little odd that some people - like gaz for example - were able to grasp pretty-much where I was coming from, while others were insulted or at least determined to find me insulting.

(thanks Porkpie)

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Andrew your last post to me totally counters your penultimate one (a change of mind?), so I supposed we x-posted there - I'm willing to drop this if you are.

But if you can't see it yourself, ironically _you_ do seem to be the most reactionary and defensive poster on this thread, every time one questioned your reasons for starting it. Or perhaps your _wording_ of things. Contemptuous wording, i'd say or at least the connotations imply such: "excrucriating," "mentality" "those type of threads" - etc - and as soon as Trayce brought this up in a civil manner you outbursted again to call her/whoever a defensive fuck, etc. Why ?

We're going in circles here. You didn't get Ned's point when he said But that's all of us on every thread! in reference to "posting for the sake of posting" - jesus that's about half of ILX history right there, what with the thread derailments. And TITTWIS threads aren't just for that sake anyway - they're actually there to help close friends keep in touch with one another, a point you might've observed if you read them closely. Which kind of makes your "distinction" here sound meaningless too - all of this can apply to a TITTWIS too..... get it yet ?
The best threads I've read on ILX have been populated heavily by people who have an active interest in participating in a thoughtful discussion of an interesting topic.

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:14 (twenty-one years ago)

It seems to me like TITTWIS threads have a largeish proportion of posters who feel intimdated in one way or another by other aspects of ILX. For the guy in charge to start a thread saying he doesn't get them is bound to compound this insecurity and ilicit a pretty defensive response.

I'm not having a go at Andrew, I can see where he's coming from, but then I find huge swathes of ILX excruciating to read, including my old posts, so probably wouldn't single out any one type of thread.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:16 (twenty-one years ago)

And remember I don't own a horse, I'm a nasty motorist

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't know how productive it is to discriminate between "interesting" or not threads in public in the first place (like Luna said, you could've just emailed her if you were curious), unless you're implying wishing one kind to disapear. Which, by the nature of this topic, and being the head moderator, you unintentionally may come across as doing so, even if ya don't mean it.

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm happy to drop it, Vic. Points taken.

Untimately I make decisions regarding ILX, but generally I choose not to. Zac and Alan pretty much take care of the codebase, and I don't even know who's handling the whole moderation thing at the moment. (I just don't have enough time in my life at present to justly preside over such things.)

I don't really think of myself as having any power or control over what people say or do on ILX, short of acting as a custodian in the sense that I'll always act against people deliberately attacking or sabotaging ilx. I guess that's why I didn't consider myself in that capacity whilst posting this thread. I regret that.

I don't know how productive it is to discriminate between "interesting" or not threads in public in the first place

I thought I was pretty clear that I was just stating what interested me personally. I don't know how I could've been more clear than "I'm not condemning this".

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:27 (twenty-one years ago)

it still seems like an excuse for veiled insults.

RJG (RJG), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Bring TEH HEAD MOD U should kno by now we unconsciously fear you, want to sleep with you, and castrate you etc.

But yeah, just remember that "bitchy button" from last year, and how the TITTWIS (i swear, i get such a kick out of writing that acronym, its DIRRTY) issue is very close to it. Threadrankinglistmaking as well. Of course it's "subjective," but who's doing it counts - and hey, you're special

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:34 (twenty-one years ago)

it still seems like an excuse for veiled insults.

Yeah, well you would see it that way, RJG.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:36 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post w/ Matt DC

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

bring = being

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Can we extend the acronym to include 'threads' at the end so it officially reads TITTWIST please? Ok thx bye.

Matthew Perry (Matt DC), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I never read the TITWANK threads either.

Jimmybommy JimmyK'KANG (Nick Southall), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)

It seems to me like TITTWIS threads have a largeish proportion of posters who feel intimdated in one way or another by other aspects of ILX. For the guy in charge to start a thread saying he doesn't get them is bound to compound this insecurity and ilicit a pretty defensive response.
I certainly don't (as a rule) feel intimidated by ILE. Sometimes some of the threads go over my head, which is fine with me, each to their own. I post to the TITTWIS threads as I like to keep up with/keep in touch with those posters who contribute to it.
It is difficult to separate 'excruciating to read' & 'the ilxors who contribute are excruciating'. I know what you are trying to say with this thread andrew & I can understand. Just trying to point out why ppl may have taken such offence. I have no further issue with why you may have started this thread.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:44 (twenty-one years ago)

so, ah, is there anyone out there who previously didn't understand the allure of these threads who has now been convinced of the idea that they should maybe get in on them cos they're great fun?

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

and i'll offer them a sherry if they do.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I would try but the last thing I need is another distraction at this point. :-)

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:49 (twenty-one years ago)

o well, have a sherry anyway.

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

lets give andrew the benefit of the doubt here, eh? i certainly have never found him anything but a gent elsewhere i've encountered him.
-- gaz

Exactly.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 09:57 (twenty-one years ago)

The best threads I've read on ILX have been populated heavily by people who have an active interest in participating in a thoughtful discussion of an interesting topic.

The very lack of that is what got me into ILX in the first place.

Sexual Air Supply (Autumn Almanac), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

life is too short for a version of human interaction even faker than ilx already is.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

also i kinda want andrew to get REALLY worked up and delete the lot.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

get to work, grumpy

gaz (gaz), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:38 (twenty-one years ago)

haha this is why i want him to delete it!

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:39 (twenty-one years ago)

you are special Jess, please don't go changing

Porkpie (porkpie), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 10:48 (twenty-one years ago)

nothing's too good for ilx. even autopilot for two years.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:01 (twenty-one years ago)

so, ah, is there anyone out there who previously didn't understand the allure of these threads who has now been convinced of the idea that they should maybe get in on them cos they're great fun?

Not after I read this:
they're actually there to help close friends keep in touch with one another
Surely that's a definition of cliquey?
I have no "close friends" on TITTWISTs.

(xposts'r'us)

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I think I have only ever met 2 Ilxors that are on these threads, so I really qouldn't describe my friendships there as particularly 'close' but i didn't join in on them for a while because I thought that way too. If you never join in you'll never know i guess.

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

That's what the kids in the Heaven's Gate cult said.

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

(I couldn't resist the joke.)

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:23 (twenty-one years ago)

haha

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

wait will i get a new pair of sneakers if i join these threads?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Definitely not sneakers, I get all of the sneakers, noone else, got it?!!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I will buy you a pair of keds?

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

you're not decided yet. i can understand that.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:29 (twenty-one years ago)

'I find the examination of ILX itself quite fascinating.'

It can be. Maybe the change from greenspun and the subsequent changes to the design of it made more of these conversational type threads possible.

Julio Desouza (jdesouza), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Dee on point:

I can and do find myself at times unable to contribute a single thing anywhere aside from the "chatty" threads and during those times I become all too aware of how ignorant and out of touch I believe myself to be.

This is more or less the answer: some people bring a lot of knowledge to ILX, some people are happy to read way more than they post, and these threads are for the people who don't fit into either group. It's the taking part that's important. Humans in "liking to fit in" shocker. Also: fitting in in "helping humans contribute" shocker.

And when I'm surrounded by all of these individuals who not only know all this stuff but who are also involved in lives I find to be quite glamorous, it gets to be a bit intimidating.

"glamorous" ("lives"). You need to meet more ILXors to get past this.

Adam Wayne (AdamWayne), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:36 (twenty-one years ago)

"glamorous" ("lives"). You need to meet more ILXors to get past this.

Hahaha OTM

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, Andrew's glamourous all right. Why, the times I met him he was practically sparkling!

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

No dee means glamour modelling! Well you know andrew is always half naked in the pictures he posts!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Half naked only cos you can't see the rest of him.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 12:04 (twenty-one years ago)

That's all i want to see thank you very much!!!

PinXor (Pinkpanther), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

He's a handsome lad, Pink...

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 12:42 (twenty-one years ago)

I take part in these threads, and don't feel terribly intimidated by anything on ILX (well, maybe Sinkah, Kogan, Alex T and the Pinefox discussing philosophy or something, to offer a real example, but even that doesn't stop me barging in and saying my piece) and feel no need for a refuge from these things (and this is an issue where both sides of the argument here have used very loaded language).

I read them because they include some people I care about, so hearing what they're up to and how they're doing is of interest. I post sometimes because I think that some of them might feel the same about me. I guess there is a core of regulars there, and if you don't care what they're doing, there is no great point in reading them. It's just a friendly chat area, influenced by its most regular participants. A lot of such friendly chat can be described as banal, if you aren't pals with the posters, but banality isn't a terribly bad thing unless it takes over and dominates, for me, and that can't happen when they are confined to one thread at any one time, out of the hundred or so threads active on any given day.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 12:47 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't understand the "I don't understand the "This is the thread where I say..." threads." thread.

kephm (kephm), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:10 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.workingassets.com/activism/citizen_action/ca_images/balance.gif

kephm (kephm), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand the 'THREAD CONNECTIONS' threads.
I don't understand the EXCELSIOR threads.
I don't understand the WHAT DO YOU LOOK LIKE threads.
I don't understand the FAP threads.
I don't understand the NOIZE BOARD.
I don't understand I LOVE MUSIC.
I don't understand I RATE EVERYTHING.
I don't understand ILX.
I don't understand.
I don't.
I.

Fin.

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the TITTWIS threads, because it's just a bunch of folks hanging out. You can follow many of their stories through the threads, but a lot of times it's just a bunch of people talking about whatever they feel like at the time. I like ILE in general and post to lots of different threads, but when I'm not in the mood to talk about anything in particular*, I head over to TITTWIS to check in. I realize not everyone posts to those threads, which is a shame in a way because I miss seeing posts from Ally, Kate, Tom, Dan Perry, and other posters that I really enjoy. I guess I just need to get out more, and by that I mean out of the protective realms of TITTWIS.

I must admit, I do find This is the Thread... to be a safe haven of sorts, but mostly only because it seems a little more laid back though also, to many, boring. It's not for everyone.

(* NOTE: I realize this statement is lame because hardly any threads are able to avoid derailment. TITTWIS just seems like a constant derailment)

Sarah McLusky (coco), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:39 (twenty-one years ago)

OK someone asked, above, why people always point to "This is the thread where I say..." instead of "Try Glasgow More" or "Mongrels/Sheepfuxors" or London FAP threads or whatever, and I think it is pretty easy to explain, in that the regional threads are pretty much a bunch of people who know each other in real life blathering whereas most of "This is the thread where I say..." do not know each other in real life and might never do. So I think that is the distinction; to me the "allure" of the other threads, which I do not read either, is easier to define as it's a place to make plans and chit chat with people you've met, in a way that doesn't distract the rest of the board. I guess, for me, a huge reason why I don't read "This is the thread..." is because I have not met most of the posters and am aware that most of them have not met each other and that isn't something that is for me, personally. I suppose it is like what Jess said about fake community.

Dee and Sarah have made good posts about why they like it though, though I will say to Dee that you really shouldn't think that way, about people being more "glamorous" all over the board.

Andrew is a very nice person and Vic, you're coming across like a huge asshole. You ARE twisting his words and his position, and I mean seriously, hands up who thought Andrew was implying in any way that these threads should be done away with? Anyone? Anyone? Bueller? Etc?

Allyzay Science Explosion (allyzay), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Andrew's tone seemed fairly condescending IMO, but I didn't take it too seriously because he always seems like a rational and nice guy.

n/a (Nick A.), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 13:59 (twenty-one years ago)

the italics were a very poor PR move. precious. title of the thread doesn't help either.

ron (ron), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah kinda Ally

Andrew Blood Thames (Andrew Thames), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

i like the wizard of oz

Velveteen Bingo (Chris V), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:27 (twenty-one years ago)

I like The Wiz.

Huk-L, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:39 (twenty-one years ago)

Why is meeting someone in person the defining moment in a friendship? It sounds like you're thinking of, say, someone you've met a few times at parties to be considered a more "real" friend than someone you've chatted with about all sorts of sometimes intimate topics online for years, but who lives half a world away and who you're unlikely to actually meet in person.

Casuistry (Chris P), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Casuistry raises a good point. There are a couple of people who I've not met -- some ILXors, others not -- who have proven their friendship time and again strictly through the medium of e-mail or chat.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

The idea of real and fake community is an interesting one to go down - I mean I obviously regard London ILX as a 'real' community as we all see each other on average at least once a week and several of us meet up regularly outside FAPs and other big events.

The original TITTWIS thread was started 16 months ago (!) with more or less exactly the same group of 20 or so people posting - think how far the nascent ILE had come as a community in that timespace. How is that not a real community (or as real as you can get on the internet, and by extension was ILE ever a community, even when it was much smaller)?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:52 (twenty-one years ago)

i've never met one of my best friends.

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 14:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Are 'Friends' Electric?

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

certainly

ken c (ken c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I suppose it is like what Jess said about fake community.

For me, the entire Net is a fake community. It makes me scratch my head that all you folks are getting so bent out of shape over ANY social bullshitting thread. Do you *honestly* give a shit? Gah.

Je4nne ƒury (Jeanne Fury), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I've deleted several posts just now, because while they would have made me feel better slightly, more bitchiness isn't what I need right now. Having said that, go soak your head, you know who you are.

I don't get why this is such an issue - I didn't think Andrew was being an asshole - you want to know, you want to know. End of story. I am not intimidated by much of anything, and certainly nothing on ILx. I guess, in the end, all it is is a thread about nothing...like many, many others around. It just happens to be an ONGOING thread about nothing. Boring if you aren't into it? Sure. Hell, it's bored me sometimes, but I started it, so I keep up with it. It's not for everyone, and it's okay if you think it's excruciating to read, banal, or just plain fucking dumb. It isn't for you. No harm, no foul.

Andrew asked, I think he's explained himself and everyone else has explained themselves, too, so really, can't we file this under 'asked and answered' and get on with it?

luna (luna.c), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I heard Stevie talking to Mark about the TITTWIS thing, once, and he did nice things with a metaphor of ILX as city, with threads as, um, areas or something. I can't do it justice, really.

I get a vibe, sometimes, that certain communities are encouraged on ILX, and others not, but I'm not really seeing any patterns, annoyingly. Like, every Sinist*r thread seems to attract outside attack, but perhaps that's because Sinist*r is a big enough part of ILX for outsiders to feel actually threatened? Whereas you list the Go thread (thanks for the big-up!), where it's pretty much just six-or-so people posting back and forth (new people come come come session tonight, though) as one you like. And a similar thing kinda happens with the occasional freakouts abt SECRET AIM CLIQUES, like on the Boarish thread.

Gregory Henry (Gregory Henry), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:13 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm not a participant to these threads but i always found them kinda sweet (my 2c)

s1ocki (slutsky), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

As a place to post random things that don't really merit a thread of their own as they're kind of in passing, it's a good thing. Sometimes it's like AIM for people who don't like AIM's pace. Also I do notice that quite a few of the people posting there are living somewhere that doesn't lend itself well to FAP action, like Dee or Sam or Huck.

I am so not a fan of CLIQUEFEAR. Yir ontae plums wi' that.

suzy (suzy), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm not sure why Jess and Ally are bringing up the concept of fake communities (for humour? Okay I guess) but TITTWIS is as real as the rest of ILX, though I agree that there can be a further level of intimacy on the FAP/city/real life threads.

I would assert that the safeness, cosiness, tweeness or whatever of it makes it *more* real in some ways - it may be emo and moany but fuck, that's because it's what the posters are really like. It's a place to express what you're thinking whether it's funny, banal, angry, upset or just to pass the time - and because everyone there is so comfortable with each other, it's necessarily less try-hard than a lot of other threads.

That doesn't mean it's better, though - there isn't a qualititative comparison to be made. I love Ally but I wouldn't want her on the thread - it's clear she doesn't feel anything in common with the vibe there. Which is great - I get my Ally fix elsewhere.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

The streets?

Leon Czolgosz (Nicole), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

It's a fact of life that in new communities, cliques or groups with similar interests or whatever form. TITTWIS is one of them, and as far as number of posts and friendliness of threads is concerned, it's one of ILX's most successful things. I've no doubt it's an offshoot the originators wouldn't have foreseen, but if it makes a lot of people happy, I hope that's good enough reason for it to be there.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

The gutter.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost to Suzy: Also, not everyone is on AIM at the same times, of course.

I've been here for two and a half years, and been meeting people for over two, and I've not seen any significant sign of cliques. There are groups of close friends, who like each other's company best, but that's absolutely inevitable and universal within any larger group, and I've never had the sense of their wanting to exclude anyone.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 15:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Whatever's cool with me. Rogue agent forevermore.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 16:28 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a vague feeling of jealousy about the chatty friendly threads...like I've spread myself thinly over ILX, and don't have that same level of connectedness, hmmm, nevermind.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 17:53 (twenty-one years ago)

I like how jess has the authority to deem his desired form of human interaction to be the real, authentic version. For the 20,300th time: not everyone is like you, dude. or, you know, even wants to be like you.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:11 (twenty-one years ago)

oops are your comebacks on time delay or what?

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

also: chill.

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:31 (twenty-one years ago)

anyway, the order goes:

-real life (i know nothing about this)
-ilx and other message boards
-things where people pretend to pass each other beers and give them hugs
-mud's and chatrooms

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

-the workplace
-church
-the white house

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:35 (twenty-one years ago)

dude bro i'm maxing and relaxing like john paxson. you don't really rile me up anymore. at this point it's just amusing how much of a fascist you are when it comes to these things.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:36 (twenty-one years ago)

-high school
-strip clubs
-tv

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

haha if i was really a fascist i would have just deleted the original thread when i was an ile mod

jess (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

do you think whoever does the fake beer passings doesn't know it is fake? that they aren't playing with the situation of being in each other's company while physically seperated by hundreds or thousands of miles? maybe it's just tiresome to you, but, like, what isn't?

haha but then you wouldn't get the chance to bitch about it over and over and over.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:38 (twenty-one years ago)

i've never read any of those threads. i imagine it's all "ooh poochums who i've never met, you are so hot, you go girl, ooh kisses for my clinically depressed internet friend," etc.

amateur!!stroll, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I have not read this thread but it's probably full of great stuff.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

and if there's one thing I know you actually do enjoy and never tire of, it's looking down your nose at other people. but hey, everyone has their own ways of making themselves feel good. for some, it's passing a fake beer to people on the otherside of the country whom they've never met. for others...

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:40 (twenty-one years ago)

ok i skimmed through the latest one and it's not quite what i expected.

amateur!!st, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

relax Oops - have a glass of this merlot. This is a nice one, I cellared it in 1998.

the music mole (colin s barrow), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAANDS ACROSS AMERICA

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

oh okay Ally, thanks for showing me your love after Andrew and I already made up. Coming from you, no surprise ever would be unwelcome to me - I just never could predict...

I needed this, 'coz you're my raison d'etre for first staying and now I know none other will do as it's over and I should no longer pretend. Regardless, after remembering this MAYBE the Madonna fight was as good a thread. But they're kind of like the pantheon of thread excellence I am proud to have contributed to something worthwhile! I miss Alfonso (but not Jefireeze). Maybe I'll make your list someday, even if it's not the very nice people one.

The check is in the mail - goodnite poochums!

Vic (Vic), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't make me revive jess's hippie love thread.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

(and one needn't make fascist actions in order to hold fascist thoughts)

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:07 (twenty-one years ago)

i think it's really interesting that you raised the "fascist" angle, because truly that's a very seldom disc--KILL ME NOW

amateur!!st, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

you're really working hard to take over from jess as the most sneering poster, aren't you?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:13 (twenty-one years ago)

thank god you're here.

cºzen (Cozen), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:24 (twenty-one years ago)

thank god all of us are here. pass the bread.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand Vic or oops.

TOMBOT, Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Would a diagram help?

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't understand ILX

rainy (rainy), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I can't see how Vic and I are more puzzling than those who constantly go on about how this place sucks and they're going away from it for good yet still keep coming back like a flu you can't quite shake off.

oops (Oops), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Jesus Christ, you guys can take this shit off the boards. Nobody cares.

Andrew (enneff), Wednesday, 8 September 2004 22:36 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.