24 Hour Party People

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
Who's seen this and is it worth watching?

Tristan Omega, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 02:41 (twenty-three years ago)

yes

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 02:43 (twenty-three years ago)

Seen it -- very worth watching. Do not treat it as a documentary.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 02:44 (twenty-three years ago)

It's great, go ahead and see it.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 02:47 (twenty-three years ago)

the part with the talking dinosaurs is best

James Blount (James Blount), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 02:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Yeah Mark E. Smith's and Howard Devoto's cameos are pretty cool

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:01 (twenty-three years ago)

How is Howard holding up? Does he still look like Ren from Ren and Stimpy?

Lucas, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:04 (twenty-three years ago)

yes

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:04 (twenty-three years ago)

I give it a Meh+

Aaron A., Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:05 (twenty-three years ago)

I need to see this movie. I was playing the Preston CD at work today and some guy who had never heard of JD before seeing the movie with his wife the other day starting telling how great a flick it was... he kept asking me... "Hey man, what was their hit they played on the radio. It's pretty good." I told him I would bring in Substance tomorrow so he could get a taste. I, have to admit, however, that I never knew the movie existed until he started speaking about it.

lucas, Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:09 (twenty-three years ago)

OK, make sure you sit no where near the front and eat very lightly before the show. Lot of it is made on like a handheld camera so its very shaky - a la Blair Witch. I had to excuse myself twice to go throw up in the bathroom... And I had Cambodian hot&sour soup for lunch so it was particularly nasty and burned on the way up.

otherwise, it was aiight.

phil-two (phil-two), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:46 (twenty-three years ago)

I didn't realise the guy who kept DESIGNING stuff was Factory DESIGNER Peter Saville. I'm an idiot.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 03:55 (twenty-three years ago)

The UK double disc DVD has an hour long interview with Saville (a hero of mine) conducted by Mr Tony Wilson Hisself.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 06:34 (twenty-three years ago)

saville is god. as much as i like vaughan oliver's work, he doesn't hold a candle to saville..

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 06:36 (twenty-three years ago)

jim, we are now close friends.

Spencer Chow (spencermfi), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 06:56 (twenty-three years ago)

Jim is a grand individual, Mr. Chow. Having met ya both, I can assure you you'd both easily get along. Therefore Jim has to visit LA. ;-)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 07:29 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes it's good.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:27 (twenty-three years ago)

It is an enjoyable film. I liked it.

DV (dirtyvicar), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 09:57 (twenty-three years ago)

here
here
and here

i might have to get it on dvd...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:10 (twenty-three years ago)

steve, if you just paste the URLs without doing all the <a= gubbins, then graham's automagic pastes in the name of the thread for you. smashing

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:39 (twenty-three years ago)

I have some sympathy with Simon Reynolds' view that it was a bit too geezerish/wasn't willing to approach the darkness at the still heart of JoyDiv. Nevertheless I enjoyed it. I had been led to believe that it was (just) going to ridicule Wilson... but I thought he came out of it rather heroically.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:44 (twenty-three years ago)

i am also among the parish of the church of Saville, although i found the gallery and interview on the DVD a bit disappointing (not enough work, the dialogue was tedious for the most part)

i wouldve liked to know why Factory never signed 808 State - too insignificant to be mentioned in this film though no doubt

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Wilson survives, but his incessant protests that 'this DID NOT HAPPEN' littered throughout the DVD commentary are both tiresome and a little suspect

stevem (blueski), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:48 (twenty-three years ago)

There was no darkness in 3/4 of JD, Reynolds! And we saw Ian's still swinging CORPSE, that's PRETTY DARK.

Andrew Thames (Andrew Thames), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 10:55 (twenty-three years ago)

Hmm, I think Reynolds falls into the trap of describing the film he wanted to see rather than reviewing the film he did see. Compare Ian Curtis saying "You're a cunt" to someone who has already been shown in the film top be a bit of one as opposed to the pettiness of "You're a cunt because you haven't put us on TV". One makes Curtis interesting (the first one), the second one makes him sound like a narcissistic teenager.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:00 (twenty-three years ago)

Pete - you're a cunt.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:07 (twenty-three years ago)

(Hmm, that makes Jerry so much more interesting. I wonder why he is calling me a cunt?)

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:26 (twenty-three years ago)

you didn't put him on TV

electric sound of jim (electricsound), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:27 (twenty-three years ago)

Oh - well why diodn't he say that - the narcissisctic teenager.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:28 (twenty-three years ago)

Haha you know I love you, you big dummy. I was thinking last nite about 'The Hours' thread and the difference between mine and Pete's perspectives. I was inescapably drawn towards the term "geezaesthetics" for what I think of as Pete's (but also, maybe, Ewing & Hopkins) position on things... preferring the sturdy, tight, coherent genre piece - in films, but maybe in pop and luvvly little boozers too - over the artsy, dreamy, indulgent and "pretentious". I think it's a form of cultural materialism - preferring to examine the skeleton and musculature of the body of work... rather than the skin and dreams that us aesthetes swoon over. (Ah! in another time Pete and I could have been the Powell and Pressburger of our generation.)

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:34 (twenty-three years ago)

can i have some of your drugs please jerry?

also, in the seeming absence of hopkins, THERE'S NOT ENOUGH STOCKHOLM MONSTERS...

CarsmileSteve (CarsmileSteve), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:41 (twenty-three years ago)

I was inescapably drawn towards the term "geezaesthetics"

You Momette you!

The thing is that 24HPP is not a sturdy, coherent genre piece - it's a silly, liberty-taking mess which works because it cheekily presumes that something of interest to a few fanboys can be made fascinating to anyone who watches it (it doesn't always succeed at this because I like a presumption). It doesn't approach the 'dark still heart' because Peter Saville's sleeves have already illustrated the d.s.h. better than anything else could, I think.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:47 (twenty-three years ago)

Yes, I was suggesting a broad tendency in Pete's taste rather than talking about individual films.

But going back to 24HPP - I kind of agree with SR that the film - like a lot of modern Britflicks - is afraid to slow down and be thoughtful or serious. It's a kind of Carry On Hacienda. And don't need to be a FACfanboy to be disappointed by that (eg you could be a Michael Winterbottom fanboy!).

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:53 (twenty-three years ago)

"because I like a presumption" = "but I like its presumption". God knows what my fingers were thinking.

Yeah I see your point JtN - it did set out its non-serious stall and stick with it, fair criticism if that's not what you were looking for.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 11:59 (twenty-three years ago)

Good comment by Hooky on the DVD disc 2, where he points out the blerkiness of it - the women who were involved get written out of the story, and the only time a woman is seen doing anything, it's Wilson's gf being a skivvy.

So, Winterbottom and Cottrell-Boyce* = sexists?

Though he used to do the TV review page in Living Marxism, and they're complete fruitcakes so anything's possible...

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:02 (twenty-three years ago)

I would certainly put myself more in the Michael Winterbottom fanboy realm than a FACfanboy. I don't like the term geezaesthetics - though I can see a slight justification for it which I shall obviously try and get away from. I suppose my big problem is the carving out of special treatment for a genre of literature, fiction, music or art just because it shows its education on its sleeve. I don't have a problem with erudite, clever works of art but I don't think that it deserves special dispensation on the other key areas with which we (personally) judge the object. Hence disapproval of something being "artsy" as this suggests it is trying to be like existing art (and poss quoting it for disproportionate effect).

I think what I judge pubs on is somewhat different but I'll think aabout that a bit more. Oh and please, if you are discussing me alongside cultural commentators like Hopkins and Ewing please be sure to mention me only by my surname too.

That said I think there is much more than a germ of truth in what you say Jerry.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:07 (twenty-three years ago)

I think the "geezaesthetics" vs "glamour conservatives" debate is a fascinating one but not one that applies particularly to this film btw.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:10 (twenty-three years ago)

interesting that hooky of all ppl shd note this

i tht it an uninvolving ordeal myself, and i wz watching it with one of the women who got written out — who wz spitting nails at the end

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:15 (twenty-three years ago)

i also didn't like that it just ended up being an advert for the superiority of E over beer and speed, which is weak

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:22 (twenty-three years ago)

If any drug is foregrounded, I'd say it was weed, which is ever present throughout the entire film - the one chemical constant. They also bemoan the fact that few people drank and contributed to the financial problems of the organisation, so if anything, the story is that 'we liked spliff, and we wish people boozed more really'.

Dave B (daveb), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:24 (twenty-three years ago)

E *is* better than weak beer or weak speed

(sorry)

Alan (Alan), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:25 (twenty-three years ago)

Not sure if that's strictly true Mark - E culture is what revitalises but in the end destroys Factory (Tom's idea of good, eighties Thatcherite businessmen taking over the music biz in the late eighties also has a lot to do with this).

That said, the gender politics of the film are v.weak, and the excuse that it is inherently a misogynistic film because Tony Wilson is a misogynistic character is equally poor.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:28 (twenty-three years ago)

They should have had Linder's menstrual clock in the film!

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:29 (twenty-three years ago)

and the gay animals wearing dresses made of liver and giant dildos!!

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

it wz a gay animal i saw it with

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:50 (twenty-three years ago)

ok the drugs dialetic is a bit more complex possibly

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:51 (twenty-three years ago)

ex-gay animal

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:52 (twenty-three years ago)

I was just reading about the gay animals! here.

Jerry the Nipper (Jerrynipper), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:53 (twenty-three years ago)

"broader artistic vistas and more lesbians"!!

i saw CC sing at the 12-bar abt three weeks ago, doing a tiny promo for the miaow comp

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:57 (twenty-three years ago)

Jerry, I don't recognise what you seem to be saying about my taste (aside from the fact that I hate art and all things arty, obv.) but I would like you to point me towards your artsy, dreamy, indulgent bar/pub, please.

Tim (Tim), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 13:49 (twenty-three years ago)

i don't know how they would know but it's on his wikipedia page, so I'm pretty sure it's something that people were saying before 24PP came out.

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:23 (fourteen years ago)

quite a bit before iirc

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:24 (fourteen years ago)

I remember first reading about it in 1988 or so.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:26 (fourteen years ago)

did he leave a note or something? I don't really care, this just seems like an odd detail to accept as established fact. as it is, I had never heard it before, and lol'd when I recognized the clip both because a) it is a funny clip and b) it is a funny juxtaposition

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:27 (fourteen years ago)

The Iggy Pop thing was confirmed pretty easily -- it was on the turntable. The Herzog detail I'm less sure about but I gather the TV was still on and tuned to a particular channel; I'm not sure if it was still broadcasting at that point or they just backtracked along the channel's schedule. (It's possible there's some other information explaining all this in more detail.)

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:30 (fourteen years ago)

what people didn't change the channel in those days. I dunno this just seems like silly mythologizing to me

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:32 (fourteen years ago)

also I am kinda amazed Stroszek would be shown on TV anywhere, ever. but UK is different I guess.

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:33 (fourteen years ago)

you can't change the channel when you're dead

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:35 (fourteen years ago)

j/k i know what you mean

congratulations (n/a), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:36 (fourteen years ago)

I saw it a couple times, always enjoyed it. I thought there should have been more scenes with the Mondays showing how the drugs impacted the music. Also has anyone read Bez's autobio "Freaky Dancing"? Theres a number of gigs and incidents that definitely should have been in the movie.

Did not know about a Peter Saville interview. I really need that DVD now.

Franklin_The_Turtle, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

Turns out it was a little more clear than I thought, but also, unsurprisingly, not quite like in the movie:

On Saturday May 17th, Ian cancelled arrangements to meet friends and returned to his home in Barton Street. Deborah was working behind the bar at a local disco, and had left Natalie with her parents while she was at work. While she was out Ian watched Stroszek, a film by Werner Herzog. When Deborah returned, she and Ian talked for a while, then Ian persuaded her to stay the night at her parents' house.

Alone again in the house, Ian listened to Iggy Pop and wrote a long letter to his estranged wife. In the early hours of Sunday morning he hanged himself in the kitchen using the rope from a clothes airer. His body was found by Deborah when she returned later the same day.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

That via here.

Ned Raggett, Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:38 (fourteen years ago)

ah. weird.

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Tuesday, 8 March 2011 23:39 (fourteen years ago)

what people didn't change the channel in those days

how many choices did he have? 2 other?

blvd money (sic), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 00:09 (fourteen years ago)

Still pretty fucking awesome that one of those two channels was showing Stroszek though.

'what are you, the Hymen Protection League of America?' (jon /via/ chi 2.0), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 04:32 (fourteen years ago)

what an age they lived in

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 04:41 (fourteen years ago)

Having just looked up the TV schedule for May 17, 1980 on the Times archive, I can tell you that Ian's choice that night was:

BBC1: The Val Doonican Music Show, followed by Knots Landing
BBC2: Bernard Levin interviews Dennis Potter, followed by Stroszek
ITV: Film Superdrome, followed by Tales Of The Unexpected

Zelda Zonk, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 05:04 (fourteen years ago)

woulda gone for knots landing myself

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 05:05 (fourteen years ago)

In Control, they show Curtis' last hours basically conforming to what Ned posted (as it would, since it was based on Deborah's book). I seem to recall reading something else where one of the last people to see him alive said that Ian said he was looking forward to seeing the movie on tv that night.

I actually like the way the suicide is presented (via jump cut) in 24HPP. So funny in a seriously dark way.

Your cousin, Marvin Cobain (C. Grisso/McCain), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 05:46 (fourteen years ago)

woulda gone for knots landing myself

= why you're still here
xp

your LiveJournal experience (schlump), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 05:47 (fourteen years ago)

haha

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 05:48 (fourteen years ago)

need to know what Shakey would have switched to tho

blvd money (sic), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 08:18 (fourteen years ago)

big Dennis Potter and Herzog fan so I would've been in for the night too lol

You hurt me deeply. You hurt me deeply in my heart. (Shakey Mo Collier), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 16:39 (fourteen years ago)

Don't want to piss on Curtis' memory but I find it more depressing that BBC2 won't show a film like 'Stroszek' now and would rather show The two fat hairy bikers instead.

Cluster the boots (Billy Dods), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 16:44 (fourteen years ago)

I was a particularly obnoxious 15 year old and so I was probably moaning at my parents that they were watching Tales of the Unexpected instead of that cool film on the other side and why the hell haven't we got a video recorder yet like my mate who's got a Philips V2000 for gods sake, it's so unfair.

I'm sorry, I did not create the cosmos, I merely explain it. (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:04 (fourteen years ago)

And what the devil was Film Superdrome?

I'm sorry, I did not create the cosmos, I merely explain it. (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:06 (fourteen years ago)

saw it a couple times, always enjoyed it. I thought there should have been more scenes with the Mondays showing how the drugs impacted the music. Also has anyone read Bez's autobio "Freaky Dancing"? Theres a number of gigs and incidents that definitely should have been in the movie.

Yeah I loved that book and indeed it seems like it would make a great movie on its own. But it's not as though 24HPP had much dead space...it felt like 2 or 3 movies crammed into one with a giant smirk over the top. I enjoyed it but I can't imagine how anyone who didn't know about Factory would take it. I watched it with a friend and had to explain a lot, like "oh yeah Ian Curtis had epilepsy, that's why he acted that way", and of course who the Mondays were and whether or not they really acted like that (by all accounts, they kind of got it right). I didn't really like how this movie sort of chastisted the audience if they took it seriously, as though it purposely didn't want you to really enjoy it. As for Bez I think "Freaky Dancing" would make a great movie; the thing is that like 24HPP I really have no idea how much of that is actually true (I doubt Bez knows, either!)

frogbs, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:13 (fourteen years ago)

The bloke who plays Ian Curtis must live very near me as I see him around constantly.

I see what this is (Local Garda), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 17:23 (fourteen years ago)

I watched it with my brother, who only listens to classic rock and American hip hop, and he actually thought it was pretty cool and funny. I did have to do a lot of explaining thoughout tho. I found it interesting how it balances the audience disdain and post modern japery with a heart of enthusiastic idealism, which I think was real coming from Wilson and a lot of the others.

A Bez movie would appeal to a broader audience, and maybe get the Mondays some new fans here in the States. Or maybe not; one time at a rave a couple years ago, I was frying with this kid in my car, and I put on "Pills & Thrills". The poor guy couldn't take it (he was more into evanesencelol). I was talking to a friend about the Mondays yesterday. By all rights they were kind of a shitty band, but somehow it all clicked and they became The Best Shitty Band in our estimation. Which fulfills Roland S Howard's definition of a good rock band: One that is capable of being both the best and the worst act on any given night.

This friend also rates "Yes, Please"

Franklin_The_Turtle, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:26 (fourteen years ago)

I play the Mondays on bar jukeboxes all the time and my pals seem to like them fine. I definitely wouldn't want to talk music with someone who finds Pills & Thrills unbearable; it's their friendliest album. Bummed is the one that turns people off (so obviously, it's one of my favorites)

frogbs, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:41 (fourteen years ago)

i fuck w/ any mondays up to but not including yes please, which i think is trash

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:44 (fourteen years ago)

Bummed: I love how Martin Hannett got the snare to sound like someone banging a door really loudly. Its also got Shaun's most vulgar moments.

Franklin_The_Turtle, Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:46 (fourteen years ago)

big Dennis Potter and Herzog fan so I would've been in for the night too lol

I dunno this just seems like silly mythologizing to me

blvd money (sic), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:53 (fourteen years ago)

i fuck w/ any mondays up to but not including yes please, which i think is trash

stinkin thinkin is a jam, lucky it came out before the album

blvd money (sic), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:53 (fourteen years ago)

do not like

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:54 (fourteen years ago)

I want to see a 24HPP-style film covering early 70s prog rock. Or was that Spinal Tap?

Basically this is how you do music biopics.

Davek (davek_00), Wednesday, 9 March 2011 23:58 (fourteen years ago)

The Herzog detail I'm less sure about

The story I understood was that he was at his parents' house, but went home to watch the film, as he didn't want to subject his parents to watching something they'd hate. Or maybe they were "our telly, our rules"...

Mark G, Thursday, 10 March 2011 09:49 (fourteen years ago)

I wasn't expecting Ludus's performance at the Hacienda where Linder came dressed in meat, to be sure, but still.

This might have actually been in the script, however...

There was something in the script that Linder had objected to but the film makers were not prepared to remove/alter. So, she rang her good friend Morrissey, who has a fair bit of spare money and access to lawyers, and the offending scene(s) were removed (or never filmed). Still, after the 'case' was settled, Moz was big enough to praise the resultant film...

But I guess the whole Ludus scene(s) were also dropped. Which is a shame, as then people would have mentioned Linder in the context of Lady Gaga's famous "meat" dress. Then again, I was the only one (it seemed) to remember the first Undertones single compilation album "All Wrapped Up"...

Mark G, Thursday, 10 March 2011 10:53 (fourteen years ago)

linder could have been "my meat dress, my rules"...

conrad, Thursday, 10 March 2011 11:40 (fourteen years ago)

Then again, I was the only one (it seemed) to remember the first Undertones single compilation album "All Wrapped Up"...

I remember it, fuckin' 'orrible (the sleeve, not the album obv.)

Tom D (Tom D.), Thursday, 10 March 2011 11:44 (fourteen years ago)

the Brighton Rock remake that came out this year has a scene where Sam Riley and Sean Harris have a fight, Ian Curtis punching Ian Curtis is a sight to behold (films a bit rubbish otherwise)

zappi, Thursday, 10 March 2011 12:15 (fourteen years ago)

ah I like that bit of triv, yeah!

Mark G, Thursday, 10 March 2011 12:18 (fourteen years ago)

I was told (on about the best authority possible) the Linder scenes were on the libelous side and were removed on that basis.

As Linder is now a fairly well-known contemporary artist, and Gaga lives in a microworld where people know who Carolee Schneeman is, I don't doubt the appropriation was unconscious on her part.

anna sui generis (suzy), Thursday, 10 March 2011 12:32 (fourteen years ago)

yeah, did I not say that? Oh, I didn't...

I read the Lyndsey Wilson book, the original script had the author having sex with 4 blokes she'd never met in real life, and Vinnie Riley out of Durutti Column.

So, who knows what Linder's 'tale' would have been.

Mark G, Thursday, 10 March 2011 12:35 (fourteen years ago)

I should really read that. On the extras for 24PP Hook (the right-on dude that he is) complains that the film doesn;t have enough about the women at Factory, esp. Lindsay.

Ned Trifle (Notinmyname), Thursday, 10 March 2011 14:31 (fourteen years ago)

yeah it downplays their roles massively, e.g i had no idea the extent to which lindsay reade was actually involved in the label til i read shadowplayers..

australian rules football quarterback (electricsound), Thursday, 10 March 2011 21:17 (fourteen years ago)

the Brighton Rock remake that came out this year has a scene where Sam Riley and Sean Harris have a fight, Ian Curtis punching Ian Curtis is a sight to behold (films a bit rubbish otherwise)

― zappi, Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:15 PM (6 days ago) Bookmark Suggest Ban Permalink

ah I like that bit of triv, yeah!

― Mark G, Thursday, March 10, 2011 12:18 PM (6 days ago) Bookmar]

Extra trivia - Sam Riley was supposed to be in 24PP playing Mark Smith, you can see the deleted scene (he's singing Rowche Rumble) in the extras.

I'm sorry, I did not create the cosmos, I merely explain it. (Ned Trifle II), Wednesday, 16 March 2011 23:58 (fourteen years ago)

I thought he was in the movie as well?

"Things could be worse, you could be the lead singer of The Fall" - RGretton to Ian Curtis, in "Control"

Mark G, Thursday, 17 March 2011 00:01 (fourteen years ago)

Not in the version I've just watched - but I did doze off briefly - not because the film is boring, just that it's past my bedtime.

I'm sorry, I did not create the cosmos, I merely explain it. (Ned Trifle II), Thursday, 17 March 2011 00:23 (fourteen years ago)

twelve years pass...

i tht it an uninvolving ordeal myself, and i wz watching it with one of the women who got written out — who wz spitting nails at the end

― mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 25 February 2003 12:15 (twenty years ago) bookmarkflaglink

https://thevinylfactory.com/news/women-factory-records-book/

Daniel_Rf, Wednesday, 17 May 2023 10:13 (two years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.