It's OK to shag dead animals, says judge

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/news/nation/16020590.htmThe%20Duluth%20News%20Tribune

― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:48 (nineteen years ago)

RICK SANTORUM WAS RIGHT

― GOD PUNCH TO HAWKWIND (yournullfame), Sunday, 19 November 2006 11:53 (nineteen years ago)

Why wouldn't it be?

― Through a twenty deep screen of humourists (noodle vague), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:02 (nineteen years ago)

It's one of those things where, while there's nothing inherently wrong with it, it's best to have it illegal, otherwise everyone would be at it.

― Eyeball Kicks (Eyeball Kicks), Sunday, 19 November 2006 12:58 (nineteen years ago)

alexander portnoy to thread

― and what (ooo), Sunday, 19 November 2006 13:55 (nineteen years ago)

please please let this decision extend to humans *crosses fingers*

― latebloomer (latebloomer), Sunday, 19 November 2006 14:38 (nineteen years ago)

He didn't say it was okay yet unless it is december 1st already.

― Bobby Ganush (Uri Frendimein), Sunday, 19 November 2006 16:23 (nineteen years ago)

http://www.fuckfrance.com/images/i039/25771.656bryan_james_hathaway.jpg

looks pleased with himself.

― gear (gear), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:12 (nineteen years ago)

Good old Duluth!

― The Android Cat (Dan Perry), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:13 (nineteen years ago)

He kills everything he fucks.

― Bobby Ganush (Uri Frendimein), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:16 (nineteen years ago)

Wow, they totally buried this at the end of the article:

n April 2005, Hathaway pleaded no contest to one felony charge of mistreatment of an animal for the shooting death of Bambrick, a 26-year-old horse, to have sex with the animal.

― Casuistry (Chris P), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:25 (nineteen years ago)

Because it's not really relevant to the current charges, see.

― Bobby Ganush (Uri Frendimein), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:28 (nineteen years ago)

"I'm a little surprised this issue hasn't been tackled before in another case," Lucci said

― Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:30 (nineteen years ago)

(But, yeah, it wouldn't have occurred to me that there would be enforceable laws about this.)

― Sundar (sundar), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:31 (nineteen years ago)

Amazingly enough, we have done this debate before, haven't we?

― mark grout (mark grout), Sunday, 19 November 2006 18:54 (nineteen years ago)

You may have been thinking of the reverse...

Ways you don't want to die #33829: Accidentally ass fucked to death and plastered all over the news

― gwynywdd dwnyt fyrwr byychydd gww (donut), Sunday, 19 November 2006 19:00 (nineteen years ago)

No, I think it was along the lines of "What's so wrong with neck...philia"

― mark grout (mark grout), Sunday, 19 November 2006 20:08 (nineteen years ago)

ok, the DA's name is BOUGHNER

― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Sunday, 19 November 2006 22:20 (nineteen years ago)

I remember that necrophiladelphia thread, good times.

― Jarlr'mai (jarlrmai), Sunday, 19 November 2006 23:28 (nineteen years ago)

I tried to find the "Why is bestiality wrong?" thread but couldn't.

― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 November 2006 11:10 (nineteen years ago)

I found it!

Should bestiality be illegal? If so, why?

― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Monday, 20 November 2006 11:12 (nineteen years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.