What was the concensus on the "I really fancy a friend of mine but don't want to mess up my friendship by asking her out" question again?

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I'm SURE we've covered it, and I KNOW there's a sensible answer, but I'm buggered if I can remember. Can someone fill me in?

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:10 (twenty-one years ago)

DON'T DO IT!

Ahem.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yeh, that's right - I think I did read that somewhere. Cheers!

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Depends how many friends you've got. If you have friends to burn its not a problem (and friendships can survive this. They don't always, but they can).

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

it all depends, it could go either way depending on other circumstances, there is no definitive answer/advice that will apply to this scenario every time - just as with the 'sex with the ex' thing, altho it seems that more often than not that appears to be a bad idea so perhaps this is too, particularly if you're not getting any signs of interest back

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

my advice was to go for it. it's worked for me more times than it's ruined things.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Do it. Unlike gambling you can't assess the risk always, if you like her you'll end up doing it anyway.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I've destroyed more friendships this way than anything else. Don't do it.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Right, relationship-by-democracy scores so far -

YES: 2
NO: 4

The no's have it by the looks of things.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The not knowing will make your head explode. Ask her out. Why the hell not? She'll either say "oh...I never thought of you that way" and things'll be a bit odd for, like, two weeks or something, or she'll be flattered and hopefully accept.

also - what d'you actually mean by "ask her out"? If you hang out a lot anyway, might she not actually realise she's being "asked out" as such? This has happened to me a lot of late, and the results have been comically confusing.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually the last time I did this it was a complete disaster but our friendship survived and is pretty much as strong as it used to be - admittedly, was very strong indeed which was what caused the problem to begin with.

It kind of depends on how well you know the person as well - if its someone you're just becoming friends I reckon that makes things easier, and the fallout won't be nearly as bad if things don't end up as you've hoped. If you're not especially close friends it might either drive a wedge between you or bring you close together even if it doesn't have the desired effect. There's really no hard and fast rule.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:27 (twenty-one years ago)

very good point, charlie. this gets into another interesting subject: defining a date/dating.

if, by 'asking her out', you mean just hang out normally and at some point try to make some smooth move and kiss her-- don't. awkwardness awaits you. and maybe a slap in the face.

but if you said something (like 'i think you're cute, want to go on a date?') first, that gives her time to think about it and agree or disagree.

(xpost-- and matt, aren't you glad you at least KNOW now?)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:29 (twenty-one years ago)

'i think you're cute, want to go on a date?'

Johnney B, by the looks of your email address, you're English, right?

Americans on this thread take note - English people don't date! There's barely such a concept. English people "hang out with mates", and "do stuff in the same place at the same time", til at some point, both parties are somehow separated from the rest of the group - at the bar/jukebox/fag machine/etc - drunk and susceptible enough to take the plunge and do domething rash and ill-conceived like go in for the kiss, in the vain hope that a. it'll be reciprocated, or b. if it isn't, it'll be put down to experience/inebriation and everything'll be fine in the morning.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

by which i mean to say, the "want to go on a date" line sounds, to these ears at least, like it's been beamed in from the 1950s and would elicit nothing but befuddled giggling from many Brits...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:37 (twenty-one years ago)

hmmmm. i just think it's a lot more risky to just go in for the kiss. could he at least prepare with some 'i kinda have a crush on you' conversations?

dating is good. english people should do it more.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:40 (twenty-one years ago)

This is true charlie, but isn't the dating concept rather coming into fashion over here? I know traditionally we've been rather more haphazard about the whole friendship/relationship divide and rely on alcohol to cover the cracks, but isn't there something of a sea change going on? Or is it just round here (Oxford)?

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:41 (twenty-one years ago)

As I say, if you really are interested, it probably won't go away too easily. I mean it doesn't matter what we advise you, in a way, cos you'll have to do something if you're serious, I would guess.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:43 (twenty-one years ago)

i can say with confidence that any of my english friend girls would be really excited to be asked on a date. especially if it was to somewhere other than the pub.

(xpost with ronan: true. have you been thinking about this for a while? or is it just something you're considering slightly? more details please)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, the last time something like this happened to me it wasn't an admission of a not-especially-serious crush on the part of someone I didn't know very well at the time. My reaction was mild embarassment, feeling flattered and then becoming better friends with them as it enabled both of us to get over our respective hangups around each other.

The time before that we went out for four months - but that happened more from the sort of scenario Charlie describes rather than a "hey, I have a bit of a thing for you" situation. It all depends on how serious your feelings are.

Alternatively, here are a number of approaches you could try.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, but asking people out on a date is fucking terrifying. It nearly drove me to drink the few times I tried it.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)

well, yeah, but it was worth it, right?

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:55 (twenty-one years ago)

The one time this occurred to me I ended up asking her out. And while it didn't work out mentally I was much better off asking & knowing than not asking & always wondering.

zaxxon25 (zaxxon25), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Well I assume the drinking was worth it. Anything else...

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i agree about dating more and how we should be doing that. i'm not quite sold on speed-dating yet tho

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Speed dating != dating

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Speed dating: a little bit speedy.

LC, Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:05 (twenty-one years ago)

speed garage, speed racer, speedball 2: brutal deluxe and speeding in general > speed dating

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Speed is a dirty drug.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:07 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, the only speed dating experience I've ever had was at Colette's FAP thing, but seriously, it was like all the WORST things from the "small talk" thread rolled into five excruciating minutes.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:08 (twenty-one years ago)

The orig Q:

This happened to me once. At least you will find out what she's really like. Rather that than wondering "what if".

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hi."
"Hi!"
"I was wondering.. if you wanted to go out.. sometime."
"No, I'm okay. Sandy was just ringing to see if I was going out, but I'll stay in."
"No, I was wondering if you want to go out with me.
"Oh, no. I'll probably just finish [her dinner in front of telly] and head to bed."
"Nooo, I was wondering ifyouwantedtogooutwithme.
"Ohhhhhhhh"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:16 (twenty-one years ago)

It depends on how much you really fancy her. If it burns like a bullet in your soul every time you see her, or every time you look into her eyes your entire being questions the longing of its own relentless existence, then you have a duty to see if its reciprocal or else you'll nervewr forgive yourself for not trying.

If however you just want a fuck, then forget it.

Herbie 4000 (39 Steps + 40 Winks), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:17 (twenty-one years ago)

kate, everyone else seemed to like the speeddating thing!

andrew, that is the cutest conversation ever. what was the result?

(herbie, are you actually my little brother? that used to be his nickname when we were kids...)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

you're better off without that thicko Andrew

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:20 (twenty-one years ago)

oh yeah, and matt, that thread you linked to is brilliant. i'd forgotten about my underaged 6-pack honey. sigh.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah that thread is great!

"if by working out you mean smoking a pack a day and sitting on my fat ass"-strongo

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

(Sorry, Colette, maybe it was my mental state on that night, maybe it was talking to two women, but if I had to do that "for real" I can't imagine how uncondusive it would be to actually "meeting" someone.)

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:22 (twenty-one years ago)

(I don't know why I'm in such a negative mood today.)

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:24 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, the only speed dating experience I've ever had was at Colette's FAP thing, but seriously, it was like all the WORST things from the "small talk" thread rolled into five excruciating minutes.

Haha Colette, was this anything like our tube journey from Balham to Highbury after the comedy?

could he at least prepare with some 'i kinda have a crush on you' conversations?

Do people actually say things like that to each other after the age of 12? I mean, I can imagine confiding in a friend that I fancy another friend, but actually walking up to someone, locking their gaze and saying "I weally weally godda cwush on yooouuu" makes me want to disappear into a hole in the ground - not becauee I don't have the confidence to express my feelings towards someone, but just...all the terminology sounds so fuckin' stupid!

dating is good. english people should do it more.

I think you're probably right. I've been on one actual date in my life, five years ago - I was so intrigued at having been asked, and so flattered that someone would actually bother to single me out of the melee of people surrounding us, that I simply said "sure" without even thinking about it. Naturally, being English, we went on a pub crawl of Upper Street...

I know traditionally we've been rather more haphazard about the whole friendship/relationship divide and rely on alcohol to cover the cracks, but isn't there something of a sea change going on?

I've been told this is the case, only last night in fact. I dunno, dating all seems so clinical and contrived and cold and hard and...dead, somehow. I kinda prefer the random, chaos-theory aspects of The English Way - it somehow seems more "romantic" (sic) to leave meetings/dalliances to chance to some extent, rather than ruthlessly engineering a "this is the bit where we're meant to kiss or something" moment.

i can say with confidence that any of my english friend girls would be really excited to be asked on a date. especially if it was to somewhere other than the pub.

Of course! But therein lies the problem. It's not just confined to girls, y'know?

Also, if I go on a date with someone, I might end up "dating" them, and once againm I'm lost in some weird 1950s American netherworld full of Proms and "going steady" and friendship rings and the word "dreamboat" and basically a load of other stuff I learnt from "Heathers" and "Back To The Future"...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Charlie you are a mentalist.

BRITISH PEOPLE DO GO ON DATES YOU MORANS. But we've covered this before.

Markelby (Mark C), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:31 (twenty-one years ago)

"Haha Colette, was this anything like our tube journey from Balham to Highbury after the comedy?"

see? confirmation that i SUCK at small talk. and considering that it was more than 5 minutes, i should have introduced you to the crying girl or something!

ok. i want to reply to this more. but i'm going to go learn how to do italics first. i think it's time.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:33 (twenty-one years ago)

(herbie, are you actually my little brother? that used to be his nickname when we were kids...)

Colette: you used to call your brother "Herbie 4000". How bizarre. Is he a little fucked up now?

Herbie 4000 (Herbie 4000), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:34 (twenty-one years ago)

I've been on one actual date in my life, five years ago

Who was this Charlie?

Herbie 4000 (Herbie 4000), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

HSA asked me on An Actual Date. It was really refreshing after all the English Awkwardness of the previous few years, of not knowing whether we were on dates or not, of thinking that getting together and getting drunk would do the trick (yes, it would get you laid, but it wouldn't necessarily get you into a relationship, in fact, in my case it would be a hindrance not a help, because I'm an awful drunk.)

But with HSA and I, there was never a "just friends" stage first, he made it obvious from the first meeting what his intentions were.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:35 (twenty-one years ago)

herbie: he called himself herbie. named after his small plastic dinosaur. and herbie's name was followed by how old my brother was. so, herbie 4000 is maybe like a futuristic dinosaur or something.

he's not fucked up. he's a good kid.

(you're not him, right? i can keep telling embarrassing stories about my love life?)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:37 (twenty-one years ago)

andrew, that is the cutest conversation ever. what was the result?

1) three years taken off my life.
2) one more character building story.
3) "I'm not really looking for someone right now", leading to 18 months of awkwardness before a rephrased question reveals that if she was, it wouldn't be me.
4) "humourous" postmortem worthy of The Office.

Also if you are going to ask someone out, I would advise having something else to do that you can crash and walk away from if necessary. Don't go round to their flat just to do so, because Miss Manners is strangely silent on how long you're supposed to hang around for afterwards.

(italics are <I> to start and </I> to stop)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Matt all those threads you linked to seem to be American-based, but we all know you are the Datey Datington of London ILX anyway

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)

actually that's probably Skidders

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Saucer of milk there Barry?

From the ILX dating advice archive, kindly linked to above:

White Men Who Exclusively Date Asian Women
In this thread, Sarah keeps everyone up to date with her/Link's adventures in Hyrule
American date format - why, god, why?
SO YOU CAN DRINK YOUR OWN URINE ON A DATE!!!!
Could I have a Big Mac, regular fries and a date?

And my personal favourite,

did Ned get lucky ?

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Steve, I'm very flattered, but I think you were talking to Mark?

On my first date I ended up in Lewisham Hospital. We went out for a year after that.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Is the second thread "Starry dates half of ILX"?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I kinda prefer the random, chaos-theory aspects of The English Way - it somehow seems more "romantic" (sic) to leave meetings/dalliances to chance to some extent, rather than ruthlessly engineering a "this is the bit where we're meant to kiss or something" moment.

i think there's a big difference between 'ruthlessly engineering' something and making your intentions somewhat clearer.

Of course! But therein lies the problem. It's not just confined to girls, y'know?

you don't need to tell me this. i assume you're making the point that with traditional dating, all responsability is left to the guy? this so doesn't happen. especially here, but even in america, i am consistently the person to initiate things with guys. so i do understand how hard it is to ask someone out/tell them you like them/make the first move, because i am always the one to do it.

and basically a load of other stuff I learnt from "Heathers"

indication of how fucked up i am that when i read that i thought 'wow, what a fantastic textbook for relationships that is!'

HSA asked me on An Actual Date

aww. such a good story! and it still makes you feel all warm and fuzzy, right?


colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Matt all those threads you linked to seem to be American-based, but we all know you are the Datey Datington of London ILX anyway

Matt should legally change his name to Datey Datington, it's the greatest name ever.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I think its important to be clear that you're asking someone out, as in OUT. I was taken by surprise once and thought i'd agreed to go down the pub for a drink. it only became apparent later that it was a date. Imagine my horror! Ideally, its best to have it in writing, perhaps with a separate sheet explaining all the key terms.

alix (alix), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Also I had forgotten that so many otherwise rational people will defend the American Date Format.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

i like stealth dates

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Also I had forgotten that so many otherwise rational people will defend the American Date Format

ha ha OMG THEY PUT SEX BEFORE KISSING

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:52 (twenty-one years ago)

They have a handy mnemonic with first base, second base etc that gets rid of that problem. Just like all their shoes have a L and an R on the top that only they can see.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Stealth dates SUCK if you are the unfortunate victim rather than the stealth dater.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:56 (twenty-one years ago)

lixi is OTM. one of my friends asked a girl out for a drink, intending that it would be a datey kind of thing. she agreed, thinking it was a friendly kind of thing. oops.

this supports my argument for asking people out in a clear, datey, kind of way.

i also think we should define key terms.

They have a handy mnemonic with first base, second base etc that gets rid of that problem. Just like all their shoes have a L and an R on the top that only they can see.

i've never remembered what's between first base and home plate, so that one hasn't worked for me. and there is nothing wrong with not learning left from right...

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Kate, Steve, British people don't DO stealth dating. Over here we call it "stalking".

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:57 (twenty-one years ago)

Is there a third base?

alix (alix), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Second base = hand up the shirt, third base = hand down the pants.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 11:59 (twenty-one years ago)

so that's it? you go from a kiss to hand up the shirt to hand down the pants to sex? jeez. i'm glad i never learned that when i actually might have listened to the rules!

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:01 (twenty-one years ago)

That's two hands there.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Fourth base? Fifth base? Homebase? Do It All?!

alix (alix), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:02 (twenty-one years ago)

First base = kissing with tongues. Not just common or garden kissing.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Is 4th base sex, or is that a home run? In which case, what is 4th?

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, I didn't make these rules up!

Home Run = 4th Base = "going all the way"

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:04 (twenty-one years ago)

I do not understand baseball.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

three strikes and yer out.

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

This always really confused me and I'm glad I never really knew what the whole bases thing was all about. Another reason to curse baseball.

El Diablo Robotico (Nicole), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Neither do I. But four bases is standard even in rounders or whatever, yes, no?

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Ideally, its best to have it in writing, perhaps with a separate sheet explaining all the key terms.

And a diagram, in a ballroom dancing/american football sort of way. "I will be opening the first door for you, but I won't be hurrying past you to open the second one"

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

Are the rules different if you know Softball better?

mark grout (mark grout), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

In Britain, we play cricket. There are only two states of being - missing, and knocking off.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:06 (twenty-one years ago)

am i in fourth grade that i think '1st base is french kissing'

i don't think i've thought of 'french kissing' in years.

(xpost--matt, that sounds really gross. i'm glad i didn't grow up here)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Use a sport to describe your sexual performance. , fuckers.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I think the existence of the "first base" terminology in my youth might have prevented the use of more explicit terminology. The government should get on it.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i guess by stealth i meant 'casual-not-really-a-date-type-thing-even-tho-we-do-both-seem-to-have-the-hots-for-each-other-boopbudupbupbudupbapbap'

i understand baseball better now having seen it first hand recently. Cricket still sucks all manner of waxed balls tho.

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:10 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, key terms.

i think we should start with 'date'.

"An engagement to go out socially with another person, often out of romantic interest." is what dictionary.com says.

similar to my probably misremembered cynthia heimel quote that it is a 'pre-arranged meeting of people with sexual intent.'

agree? disagree?

(xpost-- steve, your 'stealth date' sounds like what english people say happens here. that's just the part that happens before the drunken lunging, right?)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:13 (twenty-one years ago)

I am not yet steve, but I think two people vs two people out of many is the U&K bit.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:15 (twenty-one years ago)

lol "drunken lunging"...

Is it fair to say there are also financial connotations attached to the word "date" that would not necessarily be attached to any other outing? Not that going dutch isn't a perfectly acceptable state of affairs in London 2004-stylee, but...well, is it possible to go on a date to someone's house and, y'know, just hang out and watch a DVD or whatever's on telly or something, due to a crippling lack of funds? It all seems a bit adolescent...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:22 (twenty-one years ago)

date is too stigmatised as a term so when you're on one there's that pressure to behave a certain way...seems like it anyway

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Asking someone out on a date to watch telly - Charlie, you're my kind of man.

Huey (Huey), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:25 (twenty-one years ago)

Asking someone out on a date to watch telly - Charlie, you're my kind of man.

But of course! Like I say, I've only been on one actual date in my life (her name was Mel, we're still friends even though it ended years ago - since you asked, Herbie!), so to be honest I'm not sure what you're meant to do...

Oddly, our whole house had a discussion about dates last night, and we came to the conclusion that standard practice is that you meet someone while out with friends, fancy them, cleverly engineer another meeting while out with whichever friend is a friend of the person concerned, spend all night flirting ineptly, if flirting succeeds then arrange to meet some other time, or if you're already somewhere it's possible to spend the night together (sex not necessarily obligatory), then do so - and if you actually really like each other after that, spend the next day being hungover together - at which point you find out what they're *really* like...

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Also there are certain performance related standards associated with dating. If you go hang out, but nothing happens, you can always do so again. If you're on a date, though it's of course natural that nothing may happen, the question still arises. And you have a finite-but-vague number of them "left".

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I think this all speaks more about the British / English / Londonish sentiment than anything else to be honest. i.e. impossible to form any kind of meaningful relationship with anyone unless you're off your face on booze or pills.

We should celebrate those who go on dates for having the balls to actually ask that question - "Will you go out with me?" - rather than, slumped in the corner after a crushingly boring party, just gradually nudging up to them over the course of eight hours until there's nowehere else to put your tongues. The English way.

God Bless America!

Huey (Huey), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

I find using the word date is better than using the humourous at the time 'real-actual-proper-date'.

Last time I tried that method Charlie she vomitted all over my bed. When we did the hanging out whilst hungover bit I decided I didn't like vomit in my bed.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Grow some balls and do it...I did

mya, Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:54 (twenty-one years ago)

the British don't date much cos we all ming

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:55 (twenty-one years ago)

altho that - blue - crop - top - you - got - on - is nice

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 12:56 (twenty-one years ago)

When we did the hanging out whilst hungover bit I decided I didn't like vomit in my bed.

thanks, pete. i just had to spend a while not choking because i took a sip of water just before reading this. such a great statement.

the english version described by charlie reminds me of university 'dating', when you meet a friend of a friend, end up making out and staying over, and then you're 'a thing.'

this freaks me out. mostly because it ends up with implied commitment right from the beginning.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

So much is now clear.

(I thought Andrew F. was an incredibly great feller before, now I think even more highly of him for having to suffer through those struggles with date etiquette!)

Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I think this all speaks more about the British / English / Londonish sentiment than anything else to be honest. i.e. impossible to form any kind of meaningful relationship with anyone unless you're off your face on booze or pills.

It's the stiff upper lip, dear boy. Needs a bit of loosening up first or it doesn't half get in the way of the old tonsil hockey, what?

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:16 (twenty-one years ago)

steady old bean he was just joshing i fancy

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:17 (twenty-one years ago)

this freaks me out. mostly because it ends up with implied commitment right from the beginning.

haha this happened to me all the time at uni, but much more in Germany - maybe further evidence that We do Things Different Round Here?

I remember going out clubbing/gigging in Hamburg aged 21, meeting cute German girls, copping off at some point in the evening and then discovering, a week later, that I'm apparently going out with them...now *that's* scary.

Obviously, all these parameters change with age, but the above scenario has struck fear into my soul ever since. Like, how do you know what they're thinking?

..ooh, boys and girls, they're, like, from different planets and stuff...

I'm starting to warm to this more official "this-is-a-date-and-you-will-act-accordingly" scenario now!

xpost no Steve, Huey was no doubt being very serious about the English cultural booze-malaise.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Tally Ho!

Huey (Huey), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Sad thing is, he is probably at least half right as far as I'm concerned. I think I've started precisely one sexual relationship when completely free of intoxicants, and that was only because I was 14 at the time.

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:21 (twenty-one years ago)

huh, i was thinking the reason i don't go on (m)any dates is cos i don't drink ENOUGH...

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

There's quite a bit between "completely free of intoxicants" and "completely plastered. A little bit of drinking is great as a social lubricant, but the English style of binge drinking, especially with regards to getting PLASTERED and copping off... well, that's quite far in the wrong direction.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I did it and lost that friend forever. But then again, I suppose it all depends on your methods.

uh (eetface), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:24 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, s/completely free of intoxicants/completely plastered/ and the statement would be no less true.

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The problem with hooking up while completely plastered is that not just do you lose the inhibitions on asking if they fancy you... but you also lose the social niceties about not realising if they are giving you "fuck off, you pathetic drunk" messages.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:26 (twenty-one years ago)

that and it reduces your ability to woo her with your breakdancing moves.

uh (eetface), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:27 (twenty-one years ago)

But the plus side is fantastic text messages containing the word "grebt".

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, I'm not disagreeing that it's a crappy way of doing things.

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:29 (twenty-one years ago)

maybe this is why i've started drinking since i moved here...it's the only way to hook up with people. hmmm.

I'm starting to warm to this more official "this-is-a-date-and-you-will-act-accordingly" scenario now!

what's the appropriate behavior, then? we haven't clarified that point yet.

another good thing about going on dates...it leads to 'dating' (which charlie has mentioned in the weird film context), which is less serious and more fun and potentially less confusing than 'becoming a thing,' which is what happens a lot over here.

(xpost-- i impressed someone with what, apparently, looked like breakdancing. i can't breakdance. therefore, this confused me)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, RickyT, that was an x-post! *I'm* the pathetic drunk, not implying that you were!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:30 (twenty-one years ago)

he is tho

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:31 (twenty-one years ago)

since my limbs feel like jello when I'm trashed I imagine I could concoct some moonwalking reminiscent of Michael Jackson if he was a drunk construction worker suffering temporary paralysis

uh (eetface), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I have, I swear to God, got props from proper breakers for simply trying to keep my balance on a bit of dancefloor where someone had dropped a pint of water.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:33 (twenty-one years ago)

well, you impressed me with your dancing skills!

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Sadly, my days of pathetic drunkeness are largely over. Though Thursday 24th June may see a brief revival. Heh.

Ricardo (RickyT), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Suggestion (and this applies to each and every "should I/why does/will it" relationship thread on ILX:

Rent or buy every single episode of Ally McBeal, Sex and the City, Ellen, Will & Grace and Friends. Watch them all, paying very close attention to all the girl-to-girl (or girl-to-gay man) chats. You should find everything you need to know there.

If it doesn't work at least you'll have laughed at least twice and will have spent several days _not_ posting relationship questions on the Internet. This is A Good Thing

luv'n'hugs
Uncle Onimo

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Onimo, you are very mean. "Ally McBeal"???

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

hard to do that while we're at work, which is surely one of the draws of ILX advice...

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey, I wasn't even ASKING the question. I was just wondering if there was a concensus amond the great and the good of ILX. And it seems yes, there is - don't do it, you berk.

This date question is far more interesting, mind.

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Omino, but any woman who goes anywhere near your house will then assume you're gay.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, your penis will turn into a vagina, which will then travel onto your forehead.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:45 (twenty-one years ago)

i don't think there was a consensus at all.

but the date thing is also very interesting.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:47 (twenty-one years ago)

I was going to say thay the first "scorecard" counted the maybes as nos, so you were probably thinking no in the first place.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:55 (twenty-one years ago)

ha ha 'Omino' - he may be right tho

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 13:57 (twenty-one years ago)

My TV selection was based on them all being fairly long running shows and it would take a while :-P I could equally have picked MASH, Cheers and Frasier for all the good it would do you (and at least then you might laugh a wee bit more).

Onimo (GerryNemo), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

what's the appropriate behavior, then? we haven't clarified that point yet.

The appropriate behaviour, from where I'm sitting and having read this thread with interest, is as follows:

1. have a crush on someone/start fancying someone
2. tell them you have a crush on them/fancy them, and that it'd be great if they a. felt the same way already or b. think they might be able to feel the same way, given a little persuasion
3. persuade them by either a. taking them somewhere nice/interesting, or b. going out for drinks and hoping the requisite inhibition-relaxing properties of alcohol help the conversation along the way
4. retreat to a safe distance and see what happens

Not sure if number 2 can be effectively carried out by txt in this modern age, but I bet people do it.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

nobody has clarified what 'appropriate behavior' is on a date...aside from breakdancing, of course. well?

xpost-- charlie is on the ball. keep up the good work!

interesting. i never would have considered the element of persuasion involved.

so, is number 4 (no pun intended) the difference between dating behavior and 'hooking up'?

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:06 (twenty-one years ago)

You forgot:

5. Throw all dignity aside and tell them that at the very least you eat pussy like a champ.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:07 (twenty-one years ago)

I read that as "eat pussy like a chimp".

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

lick, lick, hoot, fling feces, start war in Iraq

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm also wondering if some of the US/UK differences people are describing are partly due to american overanalysis of things and english nonanalysis of things...

or is that just me overanalyzing the situation?

(xpost-- brilliant, kate. and dan, i figure that any guy who has to brag about how good he is just ISN'T. this may not be the case all the time, but it is most of the time)

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:09 (twenty-one years ago)

i read it as 'Dan Perry is the most wonderful man'

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm also wondering if some of the US/UK differences people are describing are partly due to american overanalysis of things and english nonanalysis of things...

I think you've got that the wrong way around!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Odd question Colette, I would have said entirely the opposite. It is British over examination which gets us into this mire.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

really? over analysis of feelings ? generally, my english friends are completely inexperienced with the kind of pop psychology that my american friends and i do all the time.

which could be good or bad.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:14 (twenty-one years ago)

the British and Americans over-analyse differently/different things perhaps

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Bingo

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:15 (twenty-one years ago)

ok, well, in this situation, i was just (over)thinking that the american 'date' style thing is making sure that everything is very clear and all intentions are aboveboard and there's a lot more clarity.

while the english way (intentionally leaving out the others in the brit thing-- dating one welsh guy was crazy enough) leaves everything to chance and it's all down to whether there's chemistry and darkness and a bed.

is that oversimplifying things too much? it isn't that i hate the english way-- i've been here long enough that i'm kind of used to it. and, to be honest, didn't go on that many dates in the states. i just prefer the date thing, i think.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:19 (twenty-one years ago)

British and Americans in difference SHOKAH!

Johnney B (Johnney B), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

One factor that also needs to be taken into account: post-modernism dictates that any "date" (or whatever else you call it) conversations can/will/must be peppered with wry "ooh-isn't-this-odd-we're-actually-going-on-a-date-do-people-still-do-this-how-quaint-etc"-type comments.

I think perhaps we've done this to death now...nobody's answered the text question tho!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

US overexamination => haven't you ever seen dawson's creek?

I only believe what I see on TV (jdesouza), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:22 (twenty-one years ago)

my life is so dawson's creek. just without the witty banter. and guest bands.

i think it can be done with text...flirting by text seems safe (even though it really isn't, because what is said is then IN WRITING and more permanent) and so telling someone you like them by text seems a natural extension.

although to answer you directly, you can't do that because you already said you'd feel dumb telling someone you have a crush on them!

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:25 (twenty-one years ago)

The answer is honesty > hiding feelings. Let her know and then the burden of decision is no longer on your shoulders PLUS you don't have to act weird in an attempt to keep her from knowing that you like her.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

or that you eat pussy like a champ

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:26 (twenty-one years ago)

my life is so dawson's creek. just without the witty banter. and guest bands.

you're clearly not looking closely enough! i have guest bands all the time...at least, that's why i go to gigs a lot. hmmm, maybe that doesn't count.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Yea, covering up your feelings sucks. I find being honest, too, to be better, because I remember what it was like the last time I tried to hide it/be secretive.

"Oh my god, I laughed at her joke, she's gonna think I like her. Let me make sure not to do that next time."

"Oh my god, I said hello to her, she's going to think that's rather upfront and flirtatious, I'll make sure not to do that next time."

"oh my god, I invited her to hang out with me, she's going to think it's a date, I'll make sure not to do that next time."

By the time you're finished all you'll have left to do is sit and masturbate to mental images of them in the privacy of your own home.

uh (eetface), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

I think this all speaks more about the British / English / Londonish sentiment than anything else to be honest. i.e. impossible to form any kind of meaningful relationship with anyone unless you're off your face on booze or pills.

amongst people i know in nyc, this is the only way that things happen. where in the states is all this dating taking place? i can think of like two people who have been on an actual date in recent memory. hmm.. does going out for brunch the morning after drunken shenanigans to see if you get along count as a date?

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:30 (twenty-one years ago)

No, that's the hungover thing we Brits do too. See above.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Dating is fun! Awkward conversation over dinner! Sitting next to someone in a movie, wondering if you would get slapped if you copped a feel! Awkwardly putting your arm around someone, hoping you don't smell like beef jerky! Trying to kiss someone but missing because you both closed your eyes!

IT'S THE GREATEST!

VengaDan Perry, Married Man (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:37 (twenty-one years ago)

lauren, ny isn't like the rest of america, though.

but also, please see my remark above about not actually going on that many real dates when i was in the states. i think i just really like the idea of simplifying things.

and it probably comes down to freaking out about accidentally ending up in relationships more than anything else.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:38 (twenty-one years ago)

only big city folk get drunk and sleep together. the rest of the country is amish.

bnw (bnw), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

"Accidentally ending up in relationships"

Erm, excuse me, I'm sorry to be rude, but you appear to have fallen onto my penis.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

no, ny is definitely not a barometer of the rest of the country. but i think that some of the date-non date debate can be chalked up to bigger city lifestyles rather than national differances.

i'm trying to think of the last time i went on a real date.. 2001, maybe?

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:40 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, i think i've probably 'dated' more over here. i have the excuse of being an american and not understanding how things normally work over here, and people seem to be ok with that.

xpost-- matt, that's not what i'm talking about! it's the thing where you wake up with someone (and didn't even necessarily *sleep* with them) and suddenly you're a couple. no discussion, no easing into things. it just freaks me out.

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:42 (twenty-one years ago)

xpost - oops. differences, even.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Erm, excuse me, I'm sorry to be rude, but you appear to have fallen onto my penis.

"Would you mind, you know, bouncing up and down a bit? And maybe calling me daddy? Oh I'm sorry, was that a bit much? All right, let's just stick with the bouncing, then."

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:44 (twenty-one years ago)

i like to think of Coney Sunday as a mass-ILX-date-equivalent-of-fun-filled-orgy myself Lauren, but yeah it's not the same thing I guess...

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

(it was way more fun than an actual date ever could be)

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I would like to make it clear that I have nothing to add to the discssion w/r/t things I may have heard in the last two months about any of the participants. Thank you.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:50 (twenty-one years ago)

(it was way more fun than an actual date ever could be)

and i was much, much nicer to you all the day after than usual.

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I would like to make it clear that I have nothing to add to the discssion w/r/t things I may have heard in the last two months about any of the participants. Thank you.

uh oh. is this drunken slush puppy confessions coming back to haunt me again?

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 14:57 (twenty-one years ago)

I think this all speaks more about the British / English / Londonish sentiment than anything else to be honest. i.e. impossible to form any kind of meaningful relationship with anyone unless you're off your face on booze or pills.

Well personally, and I can't speak for any other people, the times when most of the friendships I'd made began becoming more than just climbing trees or playing football in the park were was when we started going out drinking.

If this is how all the main non family relationships in your life are formed then it's no wonder this is how you intend to meet prospective lovers.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Ronan absolutely OTM. Play the cards you're dealt innit?

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't think I have ever been asked out on a date. This entire thread makes no sense to me.

Allyzay, Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:06 (twenty-one years ago)

that's kinda re-assuring

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:11 (twenty-one years ago)

friendships with girls wherein i wanted it to be 'on', it *was* indeed on, and yet i missed out through myopia: 2 (that i know of)

friendships with girls wrecked from me thinking it might be 'on' when in fact it wasn't : 0

fckng DO IT.

him, Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Ally stole the words from my keyboard.

Does anyone here dance better when drunk? Cause sometimes I seem to.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:21 (twenty-one years ago)

once I'm not full of beer, yes. one of my problems with drugs are that they DO NOT improve dancing skillz.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:22 (twenty-one years ago)

If by "improve" you mean "cause me to lose all rhythmic sense", then yes.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

jesus my posts are all over the place today, I apologise for my awful grammar on this thread. I am on drugs.

Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I DON'T DANCE at all unless I'm drunk. So that means that my dancing improves. Until, of course, you realise that I can't dance to save my life.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm fluent in German when drunk. Trouble is, nobody else seems to be.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

"A date, at this juncture inhistory, is any prearranged meeting with a member of the opposite sex toward whom you have indecent intentions." - Cynthia Heimel.

(It needs a little updating.)

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

If you don't go on dates, how can you follow the three date rule?

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:25 (twenty-one years ago)

While drunk, I also suffer from enourmous problems keeping my accent under geographical control.

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:26 (twenty-one years ago)

thanks TR! with the exception of needing to include same sex dates, it seems pretty good to me...

xpost-- yes! kate, you sounded SO CANADIAN on saturday!

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:27 (twenty-one years ago)

What's the three date rule? The point past which you should give up?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Three dates = license to fuck.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

do people actually follow the three date rule?

colette (a2lette), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:29 (twenty-one years ago)

People, no. Robots, yes.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

If I haven't had sex by the second date, I get offended and the person doesn't make it to the third date!

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Re: drink-dancing: I think it just tends to make me less self-conscious and I can get into the music more.

As for the asking out a friend thing, I did this once in the first year of uni and she turned me down, saying she'd probably cheat on me. I thought fair enough, as she was a bit of a tart half the time (she slept with my good friend and next-door neighbour, tho' to be fair, he fucked every girl in the 1st year, more or less). However, once her annoying tendencies started to really show (incessant banging on about herself, who she was shagging, falsely accusing me of being rude to her boyfriend once), I thought it a real mercy to find outr friendship deteriorated rapidly over the following 2 years.

None of this obliterates the sad fact that I met someone 100 times more wonderful 2 years ago, only she comes with a boyfriend who I can't remove from the equation and thereby ask her out. Probably doesn't help that we've been on separate continents since 2 summers ago.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Under the circumstances, being on different continents probably does help.

Pete (Pete), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

If I haven't had sex by the second date, I get offended and the person doesn't make it to the third date!

That's not fair! What if dude is trying to "build up the reservoir" in order to make the first encounter more "magical" (ie, sticky)?

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:32 (twenty-one years ago)

(Actually, that's not entirely true. Coz I didn't get sex with HSA until the third date. But because he explained on the second that he wanted to finish things with his previous ex first. So I understood, and conditionally granted him the third date.)

Super-Kate (kate), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:34 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, it's the point at which you should give it up. Fair enough.

My dancing gets better the more everyone else drinks, hence Colette's being impressed at my attempt at 'the worm' being connected to the fact that it was last thing on the last night at ATP.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:35 (twenty-one years ago)

three date rule: october 1st 2005, 2nd July 2019, 24th April 2045. Memorise it.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:36 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never had any hard and fast rules about when, during the whole getting-together process, sex happens - sometimes it's been a matter of minutes til the first encounter, sometimes literally months - oddly, neither situation bothers me all that much.

As I said upthread, some people, like the guy who finished with my friend after two dates cos he "didn't want to rip her clothes off", seem to think an utterly overwhelming lustful attraction is VITAL to a burgeoning relationship, but personally I reckon that kinda gets in the way of how you really feel about them.

In conclusion...er...if you *really* fancy them, then...oh I don't bloody know obviously.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:37 (twenty-one years ago)

sadly i think i agree with your friend charlie, but it's probably to my detriment

stevem (blueski), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:40 (twenty-one years ago)

The Rules ladies say wait until the TENTH DATE!!!! Sometimes I feel horrible perverse and nearly consider doing that, but who am I kidding? Half the time I can barely wait until the first date.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The Rules ladies have cooter cobwebs.

VengaDan Perry (Dan Perry), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:42 (twenty-one years ago)

They are crazy. And divorced, ha ha.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

(xpost Stevem)

Hmmm. Perhaps it's a great way to think if you get that overwhelming lustful thing on a fairly regular basis, but what if you never do? Or what if you *always* so? These sorts of emotions are only useful if they're distinct to how you usually feel in some way innit!

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:43 (twenty-one years ago)

We need a rules consensus, clearly.

A friend advised me once that if I fancy someone, I should just ask them to dinner. Any thoughts, ILX?

Under the circumstances, being on different continents probably does help.

Yeah, but it doesn't when I go back to uni and hang with her or do crazy things like phone her up from 3000 miles away just to say "Hey" (because an e-mail wouldn't have been enough, oh no).

Having said that, she really liked the phone call.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

My mother's friend has the 16 hour rule.

tokyo rosemary (rosemary), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:44 (twenty-one years ago)

I've never had sex on a third date - second lots of times, even first occasionally, and much later twice, but never on a third.

Yes, I've had lots of actual dates - I may even start doing so again shortly.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:48 (twenty-one years ago)

(hooray for Martin!)

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:55 (twenty-one years ago)

16th hour rule?

lauren (laurenp), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Once again we have the British = English thang going on upthread, I despair.

Mr Smee gave me a lift home from work then came right out and told me how much he liked me (in great detail) and he really wanted to see more of me, it had never happened to me and I was gobsmacked and went several shades of scarlet before thinking, hmmmm, I like this direct approach....We then arranged a meeting, got drunk together several times and THEN had a proper real life date, at his suggestion.

smee (smee), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 15:59 (twenty-one years ago)

hm, it's not really a hurray situation, Andrew - it's that I am completely single again in the first time in a while. I'd infinitely rather the changes that caused that to be the case hadn't happened.

Martin Skidmore (Martin Skidmore), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

My conclusion, I should start drinking. Though, I would go on dates if they involved going to record or comic shops, at a stretch I could take in an art gallery or a film, as long as I was home by night fall.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 16:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, I kinda like the whole 1950's courting idea. I guess I just wasn't made for these times.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

wonderful stuff - everyone OTM!

But, to answer the orig question - you HAVE to ask. IMO once you've decided you're in crush/lust with her the agony of *carrying on as friends* is worse than rejection. But wait.... you MIGHT NOT BE TURNED DOWN!!

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 17:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Jel-Barima mindmeld...(but I like movies and art galleries...and restaurants and staying out all night).

x-post - unless she's taken already (though seriously, I ALWAYS think I should just tell her), but enough about me. That's otm, Dr.

Barima (Barima), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 17:38 (twenty-one years ago)

*unless she's taken already*

This is a short-term problem that is best ignored.

Ov course I don't do any of this anymore, having lovely wife and all that.

Dr. C (Dr. C), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 17:43 (twenty-one years ago)

To be honest, I'd probably not say anything and let the friendship falter, but that's me, don't be like me.

jel -- (jel), Wednesday, 5 May 2004 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Am I the only one who's been knocked back and stayed friends with the person? (in fact, became stronger friends?)

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 6 May 2004 07:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Nope, see upthread.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:00 (twenty-one years ago)

i think most of the time the ruining friendship is on your part anyway, if he/she says no it's you who then become distant when thwarted by rejection. as long as you understand can deal with that.

i don't think the other person will stop being friends with you just because you asked him/her out. as long as you're not too over the top with your advances.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:10 (twenty-one years ago)

was meant to say "as long as you can understand and can deal with that, then go for it"

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:11 (twenty-one years ago)

at a stretch I could take in an art gallery or a film, as long as I was home by night fall.

What happens to Jel after nightfall? Some kind of Teenwolf type situation, I'll warrant.

Haha dates are rubbish if you just want a shag. Actually, even if you really do care about the other person's mind and soul but are sexually frustrated, you'll cock it up in some way, probably with a horrible drunken lunge scene. So: do as Ben Stiller does in There's Something About Mary and have a preparatory relaxing wank.

Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha dates are rubbish if you just want a shag.

strikes me as otm. as does the entirety of that post, sadly

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 May 2004 08:40 (twenty-one years ago)

I have never done this dating thing, but a preparatory relaxing wank seems highly urgent and very key.

Ricardo (RickyT), Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:20 (twenty-one years ago)

"I have to post this letter! But first.."

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:37 (twenty-one years ago)

now wash your hands

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

and have another one

stevem (blueski), Thursday, 6 May 2004 09:39 (twenty-one years ago)

A wank is so much more fun than licking the envelope and stamp. Bah for adhesive envelopes and stamps in my stationery cupboard.

Pete (Pete), Thursday, 6 May 2004 10:33 (twenty-one years ago)

What's the difference between a wank and a postbox?

mark grout (mark grout), Thursday, 6 May 2004 10:35 (twenty-one years ago)

you can put a French Letter in a postbox, but you can't put a wank in a...no, wait.

CharlieNo4 (Charlie), Thursday, 6 May 2004 10:44 (twenty-one years ago)

What have I done?

Liz :x (Liz :x), Thursday, 6 May 2004 10:59 (twenty-one years ago)

yes, I am a weerewolf. ROOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

jel -- (jel), Thursday, 6 May 2004 15:14 (twenty-one years ago)

even if you really do care about the other person's mind and soul but are sexually frustrated, you'll cock it up in some way,

i thought sexual frustration was all about cocking up anyway.

ken c (ken c), Thursday, 6 May 2004 16:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Alix was funny, re. Homebase et al. She should be praised more for that.

Farrell is showing off, with all his talk of... dates.

the bluefox, Saturday, 8 May 2004 14:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Am I the only one who's been knocked back and stayed friends with the person? (in fact, became stronger friends?)

Heavens no.

Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 8 May 2004 14:36 (twenty-one years ago)


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.