OK, enough's enough

Message Bookmarked
Bookmark Removed
I've been thinking about this since Friday, but I think it's now come to the boil. What it boils down to is that I naively thought that Liz's tragic death might signal a new beginning, the turning over of a new leaf, for ILx in general. For old grievances to be forgotten and forgiven. To start anew. What a mug I was. And then I come back yesterday and learn not only about what happened after I left the FAP on Friday night, but that ugly, inconsiderate and obnoxious behaviour continues to be in evidence on these boards as well as, unfortunately, IRL. The trolling on the "In Our Time" thread is perhaps the proverbial straw for this particular camel's back.

OK, so I should really duck to avoid the inevitable avalanche of "Dear Pot, Yours Sincerely Kettle." Yes, over the years I have been responsible for more idiotic trolling and general unpleasantness than most. But as far as I was concerned, that came to an end after 7/7. Unfortunately for the usual suspects there appears to be no end to boorish behaviour which, if regulated by even minimal bureaucracy, would have sent them packing aeons ago.

Frankly, I've got better things to do with my time and life than waste either arguing with idiotic trolls or bashing my head against the usual brick walls. I came back to FAPping after a long break, and two out of the three FAPs I've been to in the last few weeks have been marred by offensive and loutish behaviour on the part of known egos showing no respect for the feelings of anyone else present.

I know from experience elsewhere (e.g. WSC, AAJ) that it is entirely possible for messageboards not to be dungeons of torture. Similarly, recent socialising with non-ILx friends has reminded me that it is possible for sizeable numbers of people to meet and have a nice and enjoyable time without feeling the need to treat each other like cunts.

Therefore I think I have no alternative but to abstain from posting on ILx or attending FAPs for a while, until I have seen some evidence of real improvement in the attitude of people involved in either, trolls included.

Or in other words: if I - of all people! - can make an effort to improve and reform, why can't anyone else?

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:38 (nineteen years ago) link

FROM DISSENSUS
07-21-2005, 12:59 PM
WOEBOT's Avatar
WOEBOT WOEBOT is offline
I Am The Walrus

Default The banning of Rachel Verinder.
Loads of people are going to ask about this so I thought i'd better turn it into a thread.

I'm banning Marcello cos firstly because I was pretty sickened by the chest-thumping and general foul behaviour on the hip-hop thread. I fucking hated this and am guilty for just discovering the general unpleasantness therein (two people alerted me). Other people may have been stirring the shit and I'll be checking them out too.

Also, and just as importantly, I'm sick of him nitpicking blissblogger. What the fuck is your problem with Simon Marcello? Grow up. What it boils down to is this. If I'm going to have a forum in which either Reynolds or Carlin are going to feel comfortable, then it's a fucking no-brainer.

So there it is, I've made him welcome. I've completely refrained from making any attacks on him whatsoever. I've even been basically decent to him. What a pain in the fucking arse.

The Voice of Reason, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Frankly, I've got better things to do with my time and life than waste either arguing with idiotic trolls or bashing my head against the usual brick walls.

Just ignore them, Marcello. I know that's not easy to do, but you'll miss out on interacting with people who you care for.

I'd miss you here, if only because you don't email me anymore. ;-) Yes, I realize I'm not the best communicator. I'll try mailing you more. Sorry! :-(

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:46 (nineteen years ago) link

I guess the situation was down to peopl

ah you know, forget it, my tuppenceworth isn't worth it. I'm not involved with any of the flameness that has happened in the past, and am distant enough not to be drawn into it.

The two FAPs I went to were alternately a warm and friendly place, and a strange and odd atmos (I found out later it wasn't me, and fair enough). What people get so hot about, I don't understand.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:50 (nineteen years ago) link

An observant eye would have noticed that these posts on Dissensus were made some weeks ago, before 7/7.

But actually, sod it. There are people here I care for, but I'll continue to interact with them in other ways where the interaction doesn't have to be sabotaged by misanthropic cretins.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:51 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm intrigued by what the trolls on the in our time thread actually were. I don't often get trolled.

Ed (dali), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:53 (nineteen years ago) link

arguing with trolls and bashing your head against brick walls does seem like not the most important thing to do yes.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I am quite taken aback by this post, but if that's the way you feel. Trolls are just that, trolls.
On Friday some people made an effort with me, some didn't, but I guess the last thing ppl wanted to do was have to "try". Although you'd expect something such as the events of 7/7 to make a drastic difference in ppl's lives (with regards to the way they carry on in their lives) it inevitably doesn't. e.g. Listening to the words (on Friday) of those fortunate enough to be close to Liz, made me feel that I hadn't really achieved anything in my life. That is something I will be trying to change & that is what is different for me, but this wont be the case for everyone.
I'm glad that it has provoked a change in you, good for you (I mean that sincerely) but you cannot expect others to follow suit.

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:55 (nineteen years ago) link

Its worth noting too that whatever this "troll" stuff was, someones deleted it without any mention to the mod board as to what it was and why it needed deleting, this doesnt help others to understand the histories of things like this :(

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe, Marc, some people were relatively unaffected by x so carried on with the madness. Subsequently, effectively, a lot of people will never give up a fight.

Whatever. I don't care. It doesn't matter to me. I never think about it.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 08:58 (nineteen years ago) link

i think i've been to both of those FAPs that were marred if you may, but maybe i got lucky and avoided all of the crappiness, i remembered both FAPs being all in all, pretty nice. i remember talking to a bunch of good folks and had a merry time. but then again sometimes I enjoy people being cunts to each other too.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:02 (nineteen years ago) link

The anon troll posts have been removed. That's what I'll gladly do when this sort of thing happens (can't speak for other moderators). They served no constructive or entertaining (unless you are a cretin) purpose.

Making a big fuss about it just isn't really worth it. You may have seen how even an innocent thread for photos of Liz was abused by some anonymous coward who may have seen it as a powerful warning about using the interweb in such a way (to communicate and share feelings that may be best kept private or at least not displayed for just anyone to read - that same 'public exhibition of grief' that bellends like S1mon H3ff3r sneer at 'the people of Liverpool' for) - but more likely was just yet another dick with social and/or learning difficulties 'having a bit of a laugh'. The interweb's full of 'em you know.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I can't remember serious arguments or conflicts at any FAPs prior to July 7th, since the first G. incident. This leads me to suspect that emotions at these particular ones were running very high, rather than that FAPs are a bearpit.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:04 (nineteen years ago) link

And it shouldn't take the events of July 7th to make some people here realise they ought to change their behaviour, yeesh. (xpost)

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:04 (nineteen years ago) link

I never saw these photos that got posted on the Liz thread - thank Christ! - but did we ever find out who posted them? I initially thought J*n or maybe even G****m but I have read about militant Islamofascist types doing this sort of thing elsewhere on the internet from the safe anonymity of internet cafes.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, but sometimes it takes a big thing to happen, to emphasise the relatively small and unimportantness of most things...

xpost obv.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:08 (nineteen years ago) link

we should do a click-to-ban policy on anyone whom we think may well be a troll.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:10 (nineteen years ago) link

People are always arguing about what does or doesn't constitute trolling though - big grey area.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:11 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost but mark g but isn't that true exactly?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:12 (nineteen years ago) link

oh steve i was just being ironic, or something.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:12 (nineteen years ago) link

With regards to trolls, no matter what you do, it's useless.

I've tried flaming right back, with obviously disasterous results. I've tried withdrawing from the immediate situation and noting my thoughts privately elsewhere (as suggested by my anger management counseller) - with the results that various trolls followed, unprovoked and uninvited, and continued their harrassment there.

The only thing to do is to try to exercise the patience and forebearance of a Saint - and despite my name, I am no Saint. I'm as frustrated as anyone else. Tensions are *higher* because of 7/7, not lower. And some (including myself) make obvious targets for bullying and harrassment because of poor impulse control. Because the obvious thing that a troll wants is attention, good or bad.

The obvious answer is, of course, "ignore it" but this is very hard when someone does the online equivalent of walking up to you and punching you repeatedly in the face, while the whole time spouting libertarian bullshit about "if you don't like being punched in the face, don't stand in front of my fists". It is hard to show forebearance which is not shown to you.

Anyway, as harsh as this sounds in the light of the former, the only thing I can say is this - FAPs are not run for your rehabilitation, Marcello. If you cannot take the rough and tumble of pub conversation - with all the arguments that the arguments of high emotion and drunkenness produce - then I would suggest that perhaps it is for the best for you to continue to avoid FAPs.

However, whether it's good or bad to be emotionally involved with one's community (online and IRL) I cannot help but be disturbed by the events here recently. ILX feels as emotionally edgy and under attack from emotional terrorism as London feels from the bombing kind right now. The feelings are probably intensely connected and I cannot disentangle them.

This will x-post to hell, if indeed the thread isn't locked by the time I post it, but whatever.

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:12 (nineteen years ago) link

umm, say that again? ken c?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, but sometimes it takes a big thing to happen, to emphasise the relatively small and unimportantness of most things...
xpost obv.

like, honestly, there are bigger things in the world to worry about just now than some retarded internet geeks being attention-seeking dicks?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Yeah, but not even that!

It's the old "What hurts more, Your broken finger or someone else's broken leg?", it's all relative.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:18 (nineteen years ago) link

One takes comfort where one can. One's community is often one's greatest comfort. So to feel that one's community is under attack from the Emotional Terrorism of trolls conflates the greater fear of world events with the immediate and personal.

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Anyway, as harsh as this sounds in the light of the former, the only thing I can say is this - FAPs are not run for your rehabilitation, Marcello. If you cannot take the rough and tumble of pub conversation - with all the arguments that the arguments of high emotion and drunkenness produce - then I would suggest that perhaps it is for the best for you to continue to avoid FAPs.

Oh I see, so it's unreasonable for me to want to go out, meet up with people I consider friends and enjoy a nice evening as a relief from the week's work and the general pains of life without having my pleasure ruined by egotistical idiots or misanthropic mentalists with their own agenda? I have enough rough and tumble and arguments at work, but at least I'm paid to deal with them there - why should I be expected to endure more of it in my free time?

Thus, by your line of thinking, I turn up on Friday, go out of my way to be nice to people, am courteous and sociable the whole day through, and I'm advised not to go to FAPs. Whereas Graham tips bottles of wine over people's heads, generally acts like a cunt, has to be forcibly thrown out of the pub, and yet we should expect to respond to him with "understanding" and "acceptance."

Explain to me how and why Graham gets the free pass.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:20 (nineteen years ago) link

You can't change the way other people behave, only the way you yourself behave. If you can accept that, it's pretty easy to ignore trolls, I find.

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh I see, so it's unreasonable for me to want to go out, meet up with people I consider friends and enjoy a nice evening as a relief from the week's work and the general pains of life without having my pleasure ruined by egotistical idiots or misanthropic mentalists with their own agenda? I have enough rough and tumble and arguments at work, but at least I'm paid to deal with them there - why should I be expected to endure more of it in my free time?

But surely all aspects of life experience ups & downs, whether we want them to or not.

Madchen managed to say in one line what I was trying to say upthread.

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Show me this free pass which Graham is supposed to have had?

Although I was in the loo at the time, it is my understanding that he was ejected from the pub. It is also my understanding that he has been barred, wrong or right, from Freaky Trigger.

What other punnishments would you deem fit for having the audacity to disturb your rehabilitation, Marcello?

(And I am very uncomfortable with the idea of "banning" anyone from public events, as there have been events in the past, right or wrong, where such tactics would have been employed on me.)

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:23 (nineteen years ago) link

but their emotional terrorism is pretty useless if we, as some kind of community just laugh at them being idiots? The thing that attention seekers hate the most is to be ignored and it kills them inside. We Are Not Afraidmused or something

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:23 (nineteen years ago) link

If we show that we are scared then the trolls win.

WE MUST CONTINUE TO MAKE THREADS.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:24 (nineteen years ago) link

Seriously though, don't go!

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Ken C, I kiss you.

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Or in other words: if I - of all people! - can make an effort to improve and reform, why can't anyone else?

are you going to reform yourself into someone who remotely commands an amount of respect?

loggedout baiter #17, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:26 (nineteen years ago) link

Umm, if that's what happened, then :

1) Marcello doesn't have to like it, right?
2) People dont have to bear culpability for the actions of one individual, right? That really is how Nazi germany started.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh, that's hoiw Nazi German started. It wasn't clear from Cabaret. I jsut thought everyone got mighty sick of Liza Minelli.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:30 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought it was all about repressed homosexuality! Nazi Boys In Der Fickshaukel and all that!

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:31 (nineteen years ago) link

I think Hitler had something to do with it.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:32 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought it was economic fallout from WWI! I blame Franz Ferdinand!

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Oh I see, so it's unreasonable for me to want to go out, meet up with people I consider friends and enjoy a nice evening as a relief from the week's work and the general pains of life without having my pleasure ruined by egotistical idiots or misanthropic mentalists with their own agenda? I have enough rough and tumble and arguments at work, but at least I'm paid to deal with them there - why should I be expected to endure more of it in my free time?

If you think most people at the FAP are idiots or misanthropic mentalists, then yeah, it's probably a bad idea to show up.

Thus, by your line of thinking, I turn up on Friday, go out of my way to be nice to people, am courteous and sociable the whole day through, and I'm advised not to go to FAPs. Whereas Graham tips bottles of wine over people's heads, generally acts like a cunt, has to be forcibly thrown out of the pub, and yet we should expect to respond to him with "understanding" and "acceptance."

See when I go out I don't feel like being nice is some kind of effort or charity I give to people, sure I expect people to be nice back, as most people I know are fairly courteous, but I know I can't demand it from EVERYBODY. Who apart from Graham at the friday FAP was being anything but top notch?? Really? As Madchen had said so OTMly that all I can do is be on my good behaviour, that's how society works right? It's not about how I should be able to make everyone behave the way I like them to. But as I said, if you really feel that a majority of people in these places are idiots, then yeah sure it's probably not the place for you.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:33 (nineteen years ago) link

Marcello, I've never met you and you almost certainly don't even know I exist but I like you so it makes me sad to see you so scalded.

sean gramophone (Sean M), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:34 (nineteen years ago) link

environment!

xpost naturally.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:34 (nineteen years ago) link

For crying out loud...

These two FAPs were specifically ruined by two specific people. The majority of people who come to FAPs I find charming, sociable, amusing and interesting. I'm talking about the whole thing being undermined by one bad apple with his or her own agenda. Are we really supposed to tolerate Kate or Graham's freakouts at FAPs? And if so, for how long? Until we get thrown out of/are barred from every pub in London?

To paraphrase Mr Ingram as quoted above, if it's a choice between making an environment that's comfortable for Kate or Graham or an environment that's comfortable for everybody else, then really it is, as the man says, a fucking no-brainer.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:37 (nineteen years ago) link

So much for the kindler, gentler Marcello.

Would you suggest a vote, then? Ban Kate vs. Ban Marcello?

I'm glad that your new, "kindler, gentler" act has been shown up for the sham it is - just another platform for you to get on your old hobbyhorse. Cheers.

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

I hardly think that who and what are tolerated can be a communal decision (in 'real life' anyway - a moderated messages board is arguably different).

When you're not happy with someone's behaviour you are entitled to express that, just as others are entitled to ignore it because SOME THINGS ARE MORE IMPORTANT, or because they have learned the wisdom in Madchen's words and are much happier for it.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Archel is, as always, totally otm.

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Can a neutral (hah) party give a summary as to what happened on Friday for those unlucky enough not to attend.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:42 (nineteen years ago) link

These two FAPs were specifically ruined by two specific people.

see it's this bit. RUINED??? that implies it's gone from great to the shittiest fucking thing in the whole world. i mean, a little over-dramatic won't you say? The FAP on Friday was so fucking great. Despite Graham having done something despictable, isn't that a testament to how great people are?

I don't like being blunt but this is my point

To paraphrase Mr Ingram as quoted above, if it's a choice between making an environment that's comfortable for Kate or Graham or an environment that's comfortable for everybody else, then really it is, as the man says, a fucking no-brainer.

i don't think many people are feeling like the enviornment is being so utterly intolerable. but if you really can't see that all in all the positives outweighed the negatives, and finding it really uncomfortable then perhaps it really isn't the place for you. (i.e. it's also a choice between making an environment that is comfortable for you vs other people's too - there is no one environment that is good for EVERYONE ELSE because we are all after different things)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:44 (nineteen years ago) link

It's not as bad as that. Most FAPs are genuinely tedious affairs, with nothing more exciting happening than the Lex falling off his chair.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:44 (nineteen years ago) link

There is no way Graham would be accepted back with as much understanding as yourself, Marcello. "Free pass" couldn't be further from the truth. Kate has turned up at dozens of events without causing any trouble at all and therefore is a different discussion altogether.

Tom OTM upthread, really.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:44 (nineteen years ago) link

Also maybe the actual events should be kept offboard unless the actual wronged parties want to bring it up? Sorry.

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

How does it feel to be "discussed", you guys?

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:45 (nineteen years ago) link

with nothing more exciting happening than the Lex falling off his chair.

I missed this :(

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:47 (nineteen years ago) link

The two examples Marcello cites both took place at gatherings held under very difficult circumstances. They are not exemplory of what usually happens at such gatherings, or at least didn't prior to July 7th. So it seems daft to base complaints on this, because it's not the norm, and everyone is trying to come to terms with what has happened with no script.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:47 (nineteen years ago) link

To paraphrase what Matthew said further down that Dissensus thread: what's bored me about Kate over the last four years is the endless vacillating - now she's nice, now she's a twat - and I'm supposed to be patient and understanding. So I don't see any point in continuing to engage with her here or elsewhere.

Like I say, I went out of my way to nice to her on Friday. I've refrained from starting any arguments with her on ILx over the last month or so. That'll teach me to try it!

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:48 (nineteen years ago) link

These sorts of threads and arguments really put me personally off attending big FAPs in future though, it must be said (well, it didn't HAVE to be said I suppose but there you go). Not that should stop anyone else carrying on as they do.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:50 (nineteen years ago) link

i can now start attending FAPs again now stevem's been put off.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:52 (nineteen years ago) link

I still don't understand why it matters so much, but then I don't know the underlying reason(s), such as they may be.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:52 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey, get a room "fun"boys and gurls.

Lucretia My Reflection (Lucretia My Reflection), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:54 (nineteen years ago) link

I still don't understand why it matters so much, but then I don't know the underlying reason(s), such as they may be.
-- mark grout (mark.grou...), July 26th, 2005 10:52 AM. (mark grout) (later)

come on mark, his username is "Society Asshole" ffs!

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:55 (nineteen years ago) link

At least Ken and I always know to LICK and make up...

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:56 (nineteen years ago) link

From that thread I would agree that people ought "to be respectful of one another." That includes "not pouring bottles of wine over other people's heads at funeral wakes."

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:56 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought it was "Society as a whole"...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:57 (nineteen years ago) link

Marc, I thought that was established behav. for weddings and funerals...

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:58 (nineteen years ago) link

If either of you had the slightest fucking interest in a pleasant atmosphere, you'd ignore what the other one says.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 09:59 (nineteen years ago) link

This is why I would prefer in future to do my own socialising with actual IRL friends in an environment where I do not have to "ignore what the other one says."

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Marcello you are acting like a child. Why can't you make a personal decision about what you do and don't find acceptable without needing the whole of ILE on your side? Grow up.

Archel (Archel), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:03 (nineteen years ago) link

but then what will you do when one of your IRL friends starts acting up? Or are they all perfect?

xp

Ste (Fuzzy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:04 (nineteen years ago) link

Wow, I wish Melbourne FAPs were as exciting. Hell, at ours Trayce just gets schnickered and we talk about video games. London truly is where it's at.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:05 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.alles.or.jp/~jit/snickers.gif ?

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Theres not enough of us, so we have to be nice to each other to ensure we keep our numbers right mikey?

xpost

In the springtime of the year / Kate (papa november), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago) link

(Archel xpost)

Because I cannot believe that I am the only person here who finds this kind of behaviour offensive and upsetting.

Or is it just my ludicrously antiquated, decadent humanist notion that people should treat other people with basic courtesy, decency and respect? Silly me! What was I thinking?

Or maybe it's others like Graham who actually need to grow up?

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Certainly none of the responses on this thread so far have caused me to revise my original decision, so I'm just going to leave it here.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:09 (nineteen years ago) link

ILx, for better or for worse (of fuck it, clearly for better) are my IRL friends. I do not make this distinction. Don't need to, and if you do then perhaps it is not the place for you. Grandstanding on the issue is not going to help. And comparing Kate & Graham is really uncalled for. One is a friend who occasionally flies of the handle, but we (and she) puts in the effort because it is worth it. The other has had plenty of effort put in on one side and has shown no willingness to put any effort in on his side. As a friend he has repeatedly shown that he has nothing to offer us, so we shun the (lack of an) offer. Very different situations.

If you want the friendship fine. If you don't, then don't bother. Which is basically what this thread is saying right?

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:10 (nineteen years ago) link

I think we need to settle this according to the old ways.

*gestures to dusty duelling pistols mounted on the wall. one is engraved 'C/D', the other 'S/D'*

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Because I cannot believe that I am the only person here who finds this kind of behaviour offensive and upsetting.

You're not the only one, but your own behaviour (online at least) is found offensive and upsetting by same people.

Why continue to talk about Graham when a) he's not here and b) everyone agrees it's best he didn't turn out to ILE gatherings in future and would rather just forget him altogether?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:12 (nineteen years ago) link

xpost

I didn't actually see Teh Lex fall off his chair either, and am not even sure it happened. But I'm sure it could have happened, and that is the point.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

Grrrrr EVERYBODY THINKS WHAT GRAHAM DID WAS AWFUL. HE IS A TOTAL STRAW MAN HERE.

Marcello we all need a break from ILX sometimes, I can totally understand why. But EVERY TIME you need one you maneouvre yourself into a totally pointless fight so you can give yourself a 'reason to leave'. There is no shame in just taking a bloody break! I just don't get your compulsion to burn bridges as soon as you build them. :(

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:13 (nineteen years ago) link

what pete said. i've met none of you (really) 'irl' but count y'all real friends. if that's sad, so be it, but there's no clear-cut disctinction between the two.

i don't know what this thread is meant to achieve.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Plus I'm not sure if audacious, pompous 'I AM QUITTING ILX FOREVER UNTIL IT IS PROVEN TO BE WORTHY OF MY PRESENCE' threads really deserve much beyond the usual contempt to be frank.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Enrique mate, can you lend me a tenner mate?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:16 (nineteen years ago) link

I like ILX. But am not sure if the whole of ILX cares for me. Doesn't stop me from posting. :-)

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:17 (nineteen years ago) link

i don't know what this thread is meant to achieve.

A desire in this ILXer to get to a London FAP ASAP, sounds entertaining.

Matt (Matt), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Don't, he'll be asking to borrow money for his deposit next.

Pete (Pete), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Maybe we should all, each, individually, start "Should I leave" threads and everyone else vote.

On the other hand, no.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:19 (nineteen years ago) link

no worries, steve -- but are you cool to feed my cat over the weekend?

N_RQ, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:19 (nineteen years ago) link

Hell, I advocate these FAPS as a actual, literal duelling ground for feuding posters.

It would probably get fairly quiet though, very quickly.

Mike Stuchbery (Mike Stuchbery), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:20 (nineteen years ago) link

I wish someone had poured a drink over my head! It mightve been fun.

(NO ONE GET ANY IDEAS)

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:20 (nineteen years ago) link

http://www.kingdomofacre.org/images/joust.GIF

mark s (mark s), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:21 (nineteen years ago) link

what an attention seeker

shy boy, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Genuine question....What is a troll? apart from the obvious answer of "a fairy tale creature prone to living under bridges".

Knowing this would make many threads a lot clearer to me.

Paul Kelly (kelly), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Am I thinking of the right Graham? I can't believe he would do that.

rainy (rainy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Branston pickle sandwiches and pints at 20 paces!!!

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:22 (nineteen years ago) link

Paul,

1. troll
One who posts a deliberately provocative message to a newsgroup or message board with the intention of causing maximum disruption and argument

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:25 (nineteen years ago) link

What might encourage me to come back to ILx would include Dissensus/Stockwell-style hardcore policing of boards, with all trolls immediately and unceremoniously ejected, and regular persistent offenders given the sin bin/ASBOs treatment (and feel free to include me in the latter if I step over the line).

But in truth I probably won't come back to ILx (yes, MC, how many hundreds of times have you said that before, blah blah cry wolf etc etc) because chances are that I'll encounter someone acting like a twat within five minutes of my return, and I'd prefer to contribute to a message board where that doesn't happen.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:27 (nineteen years ago) link

Genuine question....What is a troll? apart from the obvious answer of "a fairy tale creature prone to living under bridges".

Knowing this would make many threads a lot clearer to me.
What makes you think there is an alternate answer?
x-post
Damnit Nathalie! ;-)

PinXorchiXoR (Pinkpanther), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago) link

for those who want a reason to not turn up at FAPs (either for the first time, or ever again)

here we go..
http://www.lolrider.com/poptimism/DCP_4419.JPG

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:28 (nineteen years ago) link

dissensus is shit, though, let's face it. if it's a choice between the occasional violation of the line between funny and twattish, which is a line some of the best posters here walk, and some grimfaced wire readers talking grime, it's a fucking no-brainer.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:31 (nineteen years ago) link

and I'd prefer to contribute to a message board where that doesn't happen.

I really dont mean to laugh, but good luck finding one - seriously Marcello, I'm not being sarky. This place is a goldmine of maturity compared to most discussion boards, by a LONG MARGIN.

Trayce (trayce), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:32 (nineteen years ago) link

this thread reads a bit like that weird troll thread that made those posts saying "Ned Ragget cannot be trusted, I beseech you all to take heed at this time of great woe. Ned is a devious manipulator" etc, and then began inserting different regular poster names in each time, with long wordy responses.

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:34 (nineteen years ago) link

1P3 is a board of love.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Grrrrr EVERYBODY THINKS WHAT GRAHAM DID WAS AWFUL. HE IS A TOTAL STRAW MAN HERE.

Marcello we all need a break from ILX sometimes, I can totally understand why. But EVERY TIME you need one you maneouvre yourself into a totally pointless fight so you can give yourself a 'reason to leave'. There is no shame in just taking a bloody break! I just don't get your compulsion to burn bridges as soon as you build them. :(

This seems very OTM to me.

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:37 (nineteen years ago) link

I did have a long post to write on this thread, but a) I've forgotten it and b) it has been xposted out of relevance since this morning anyway. And, for another, I have no idea what happened at either of the FAPs Marcello is talking about, apart from what has been posted on the thread about Friday's FAP.

The "instaban" that Marcello is apparently demanding would be a Bad Idea, though. It's a fine line between trolling and, um, not trolling. I've been a cunt towards people in the past myself - some of them current ILXors - usually when I've been feeling a bit unstable, and possibly sectionable even. At times like that, you don't feel well enough to tell yourself to step away from the keyboard; and being isolated from your friends is also likely to make you worse.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:52 (nineteen years ago) link

This is exactly why the sin bin/ASBO idea would work; it gives people time to cool off without the temptation of posting again when they're still in a rage, so that by the time they're let back on the boards, they've calmed down.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:55 (nineteen years ago) link

MAybe more photoshop threads would help

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:56 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm torn between things I want to say and the desire that we stop talking about Friday because it isn't doing anything constructive, but I will say that I rather assumed from the atmosphere during that incident that it was unlikely that Graham would be coming back, and even more unlikely that he would be at all tolerated in future.

I am sad to hear that you won't be coming to FAPs, Marcello, because whenever I've seen you in person I've liked you, which I can't always say for whenever I've come across you online.

spontine (cis), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 10:58 (nineteen years ago) link

My problem is that I'm not sure Graham won't come back. If I go to an FAP it's inevitable that I'll have one eye on the door, waiting for him to materialise, waiting for trouble to happen, and that kind of tension is no good when you're trying to socialise.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:01 (nineteen years ago) link

Report him to the Met Police and then one day he'll be running for a train and the next minute...

No more graham.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:02 (nineteen years ago) link

I'm kidding.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Seriously though.

It is an option.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:03 (nineteen years ago) link

Dude, trust your friends.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:03 (nineteen years ago) link

I dunno. Maybe we're all still far too het up over recent events to gain any proper perspective.

If FAPs really all were about having daft conversations about Irish country music and practising dance moves from More! Magazine then I'd have no problem with them whatsoever. It's the other stuff that worries me.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:07 (nineteen years ago) link

If you engage in sniping/criticism with someone online (whether you're bearing the brunt more or dishing it out more than the other person) there will be tension if you both decide to go to the pub one night. I suppose you either deal with that when you're there (my preferred method is to not talk to them but still be courteous enough when it comes to passing them) or you stay away.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:08 (nineteen years ago) link

I'd prefer to contribute to a message board where that doesn't happen.

Marcello, I've been on a lot of boards and lists, and believe me, you aren't going to find this. ILX is the best in this respect, easily, annoying though it may be when it gets all snarky like this.

Increasingly I'm thinking an "ignore user" feature, where posts from selected people aren't shown might be a good thing.

I'm sorry that there was unpleasantness at your meet-up.

Pashmina (Pashmina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:11 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to go to a FAP

but i bet everyone would ignore me there.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:12 (nineteen years ago) link

Noise Dude Enemy List

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:13 (nineteen years ago) link

I would prefer to live in a world where terrorism doesn't happen.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:14 (nineteen years ago) link

it depends if you're going to pee yourself there or not hari

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:14 (nineteen years ago) link

Bullying and Emotional Terrorism

"You have been locked out of posting to this board by an administrator"

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:14 (nineteen years ago) link

In all honesty I probably won't.

But I would make some pretty bad jokes.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

What's the quickest way to a girls heart?

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Pickaxe.

xpost.

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

THERE IS A LOT MORE WHERE THAT CAME FROM LONDON

Hari A$hur$t (Toaster), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I didn't actually see Teh Lex fall off his chair either, and am not even sure it happened. But I'm sure it could have happened, and that is the point.

a scurrilous rumour! I recall nothing of the sort and DENY IT ALL.

fwiw, I didn't feel that Graham's cuntishness on Friday ruined anything, because nothing that one insignificant potato-person does can be enough to offset the goodness of everyone else. I would understand if Colette felt differently! And Marcello, I enjoyed meeting you in person and would like to do so again, so I hope that you rethink this decision not to come to faps.

lex loggd out, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:16 (nineteen years ago) link

So hi guys..... what happened? Did I miss something? You British people are all so funny and nice and clever!

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago) link

What might encourage me to come back to ILx

How are you managing to post while you're away???

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Bizarre how that Noise Enemy thread morphed into an AMM thread two-thirds of the way through.

Still I should clearly be honoured to be included in such distinguished company.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:18 (nineteen years ago) link

that enemies thread is my favourite thread on ilx. those boys are just so cute!

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Poor Jon, he puts so much time and energy into ILE and this is how we repay him!

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:20 (nineteen years ago) link

everytime i read it it makes me want to hug everyone of them

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:20 (nineteen years ago) link

and tell them everything's going to be just fine

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:21 (nineteen years ago) link

I wouldn't hug anyone with crimson navel fluff!

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:22 (nineteen years ago) link

And when their guard's down, BAM! fork in the eye.

Andrew Farrell (afarrell), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:22 (nineteen years ago) link

and THEN straight to the moon...

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:23 (nineteen years ago) link

*checks navel urgently*

crimson

dammit...

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:24 (nineteen years ago) link

haha i've just counted! I made the noise enemy list EIGHT TIMES! can you beat that?? EIGHT TIMES! CAN YOU DIG THAT SUCKAHSS???

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:25 (nineteen years ago) link

Increasingly I'm thinking an "ignore user" feature, where posts from selected people aren't shown might be a good thing.

I'm sure this idea has been considered and rejected several times in the past. And it's not like you can add a feature like that to a FAP.

Looking at that Noize Enemy list, I'd view being on it as a compliment.

*checks navel urgently*

I heard the internet was full of navel gazers; to make sure I'd fit in, I went down to the docks to watch all the shipping.

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:26 (nineteen years ago) link

noize board enemy list superwang!

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:28 (nineteen years ago) link

(AFAIK the only person in a position to do any feature coding is currently fearsomely overworked and can't do more than firefighting. So "solutions" to the "ills of ILX" need to happen within the existing framework. Just saying before any reformers get too excited)

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:29 (nineteen years ago) link

What's the noize enemy list?

Baaderonixx cancels each other out (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link

you should see the laughter enemy list Ken

Ronan (Ronan), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:32 (nineteen years ago) link

John Knox to thread with his girdle of stout hessian!

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:34 (nineteen years ago) link

Was that meant for another thread?

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Tom was talking about reformers not getting too excited...

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:36 (nineteen years ago) link

John Knox was probably a laughter enemy too.

(and it emerged on a third thread that several ILXors have been tapped on the head with John Knox's trousers)

Forest Pines (ForestPines), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:37 (nineteen years ago) link

And there was I thinking John Knox was one of your favourite Scottish people (x-post)

Mädchen (Madchen), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:39 (nineteen years ago) link

I like the posts by Mike Stuchbery - never read him before, but he's on top form here!

I like also Mark S's jousting picture.

the blissfox, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:42 (nineteen years ago) link

I thought you said John Foxx..

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:42 (nineteen years ago) link

John Knox was, to quote Billy Connolly, "a weary willy of a man." In Alasdair Gray's book, Lanark imagines a heroic ending with John Knox's statue sinking beneath the waves of the flood, though that in fact is not the ending that he gets.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:47 (nineteen years ago) link

Aw, come on Marcello, we'd only just burried the hatchet...

Rainy, Natalie, I had considered emailing both of you re: Graham, but I'll just keep it short here. Both of you seem like great women, so I'm not saying this with any disrespect, but as someone who invested a lot of emotional time and effort in trying to be a friend to Graham, I think the mentoring process is a lot less draining if you're not in the same country. I still feel terrible for giving up on him, but without wanting to sound melodramatic, it was him or my sanity.

Anna (Anna), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:50 (nineteen years ago) link

I like...oh who cares.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:51 (nineteen years ago) link

haha i've just counted! I made the noise enemy list EIGHT TIMES! can you beat that?? EIGHT TIMES! CAN YOU DIG THAT SUCKAHSS???

-- ken c (pykachu10...) (webmail), July 26th, 2005 8:25 AM. (ken c) (later) (link)

Does that count when I accuse you of being RANDOS? ;D

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:55 (nineteen years ago) link

I think Ken is actually Jon.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 11:58 (nineteen years ago) link

Increasingly I'm thinking an "ignore user" feature, where posts from selected people aren't shown might be a good thing.

Not a very good idea in practice. Sounds good in theory, but then people will reply to one of their messages and you'll get all confused wondering what they replied to... Suddenly realizing that, oh yeah, I blocked that user.

Anna, thank you. I realize I shouldn't have commented on the thread, not knowing what happened, but I was curious. I should have also realized it's just none of my business and that I would/could upset people. I am sorry if I have done so.

I like...oh who cares.

No, no, we care a lot. :-)

nathalie's body's designed for two (stevie nixed), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Marcello, it would be a shame if you sloped off over something that happened when you were not around and was beyond your control anyway. You are also not required to keep an eye on the pub door to 'protect' the rest of us inside. In fact, most of the people making a fuss weren't even around when it all kicked off.

What we had on Friday was a situation where a lot of people were dead uncomfortable with someone's presence (and with good reason). Most of you could keep the situation at arm's length and did so; G pretty much shadowed my group of friends all the way back from Essex (distressing some of us) and we did talk about doing the decent thing and telling him to sod off at the pub door but like Kate decided in favour of giving him the benefit of the doubt. As the night went on it became clear that we would have to revise that decision, and some of the girls decided we'd simply had enough.

suzy (suzy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:06 (nineteen years ago) link

xxxxxxpost


(I thought it was 'Society is a hole')

Baaderonixx cancels each other out (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:08 (nineteen years ago) link

Hey Anna, the hatchet remains buried :-)

I just get jumpy when it comes to things like violence and shouting. Can't help it guv; way I was brought up innit :-(

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:15 (nineteen years ago) link

I really don't think Graham is going to come back. He stayed away from FAPs by and large for two years, it took extraordinary circumstances to bring him back, and he's now had it made *explicitly* clear he isn't welcome, and charges may actually be pressed if he tries anything like it again.

(Aside - I think Marcello has done exceptionally well in recent weeks in building bridges and reintegrating himself. Its a bit of a shame to see this largely unnecessary thread stir everything up again).

Matt DC (Matt DC), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:18 (nineteen years ago) link

Matt - it is a difficult struggle. I just hate to see people at loggerheads. I came back to FAPs (and a lot of other things, but you don't need to know that) after a long internal struggle with myself. I have to take it one step at a time. Sometimes it's as difficult as cutting one of my arms off. But I have to keep on doing it.

I just hate to see unpleasantness in others when I'm trying my best to eradicate it from myself.

I need to learn not to get wound up by idiotic trolling first thing in the morning. That really set my teeth on edge, in combination with everything else.

So I am totally and completely sorry if anyone got wound up the wrong way by this thread, and feel free to delete it if you think it's unnecessary.

The actual truth is I LOVE all you people but I can't stand seeing you arguing, in part because it sets me off arguing again. You know how people who've just stopped smoking suddenly become virulent anti-smoking? That's kind of how it makes me feel.

For me it's like learning to walk again. You stumble quite a lot in the early stages until you gradually rebuild your own confidence.

Apologies, apologies, what more can I say?...I'm trying, chaps, I'm trying.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:31 (nineteen years ago) link

DO try it!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:38 (nineteen years ago) link

What a day, you guys. What a day.

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 12:57 (nineteen years ago) link

WHAT HAPPENED

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 13:00 (nineteen years ago) link

Nothing of consequence Jon. I had a flare-up and then it de-flared again. Pay no mind.

Marcello Carlin, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 13:01 (nineteen years ago) link

There's days when you want to punch Marcello but today I'd want to give him a big hug.

Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 13:05 (nineteen years ago) link

Once my dad got drunk and tried to hug my brother and punch him in the back at the same time.

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 13:22 (nineteen years ago) link

(I should shut up now, sorry.)

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 13:23 (nineteen years ago) link

Wow, I kind of wish I'd been there to see Graham's spectacular display of idiocy. Even Calum isn't that stupid!

(Sorry, I'm engaging in crass point-and-laughism, will go fuck off now.)

The Ghost of Dan Perry (Dan Perry), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:26 (nineteen years ago) link

has anyone met up with calum yet?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:36 (nineteen years ago) link

I don't think he'd be that bad.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:37 (nineteen years ago) link

Cannes attendees?

(What did Graham do?)

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link

he sounds like a good laugh for a pint actually.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:38 (nineteen years ago) link

especially with a better shirt

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Does Graham post to ILX? Did he in times past?

Truckdrivin' Buddha (Rock Hardy), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:39 (nineteen years ago) link

i'd come to a fap if calum showed.

N_RQ, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:40 (nineteen years ago) link

I wonder if anyone in SF met him when he did that film festival thingie?

M. White (Miguelito), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:41 (nineteen years ago) link

OK, enough's enough

mark grout (mark grout), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:42 (nineteen years ago) link

Graham was a regular on ILX back in the Greenspun days and then wrote the code for the board as it stands now when we moved to another server.

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:42 (nineteen years ago) link

: (

RJG (RJG), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:42 (nineteen years ago) link

It'd be great to go for a pint with Calum!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:42 (nineteen years ago) link

It'd be great to go for a pint with Calumn.

the pinefox, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:44 (nineteen years ago) link

I bet you he doesn't drink tho

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:46 (nineteen years ago) link

is this Graham you're talking about the same old-skool Graham that liked Helen Love? i thought he was like hella shy n stuff?

g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:46 (nineteen years ago) link

he abhors laddism.

xpost

N_Rq, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:47 (nineteen years ago) link

ned raggett stood him up in SF i think :-(

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:47 (nineteen years ago) link

and yeah, Calum attendance at a FAP would be like, the ultimate reason for me to bite the bullet and break my FAP virginity.

g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:48 (nineteen years ago) link

was that SF? can't remember now. at somewhere that's surprisingly small. (viper room?)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:48 (nineteen years ago) link

Yay, way to go, the Nedster!

Dadaismus (Dada), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned and Calum at the Viper Room would make a great novel or play.

Leon C. (Ex Leon), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

"They've got me over a barrell" : euphemism for getting fucked up the ass?

woah, does he lurk or what?

N_RQ, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:49 (nineteen years ago) link

fanfic

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:50 (nineteen years ago) link

Graham became extremely abusive on ILX, right? I'm not sure if he was banned or if he left the boards voluntarily.

Tuomas (Tuomas), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:50 (nineteen years ago) link

he was angry becuase nobody bought him buffy boxsets as a payment for the codes on this board.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:51 (nineteen years ago) link

i prefer Sailor Moon (omgwtf xthread weirdness)

g-kit (g-kit), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 14:52 (nineteen years ago) link

remember that time graham threatened to delete ilx?

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:15 (nineteen years ago) link

Now don't do anything STUPID now... put down the keyboard... EASY...

Baaderonixx cancels each other out (Fabfunk), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:17 (nineteen years ago) link

Can someone link some of these threads so us newbies/non-FAP goers can work out WTF all this is about??

Or should we/I just mind my own business, I dunno...

Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:17 (nineteen years ago) link

(This is the last post I'll make on this subject: the reason for the bad blood between Graham and most other London ILX people is very little to do with his online behaviour. xpost So thread-linking is pretty irrelevant.)

Tom (Groke), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:19 (nineteen years ago) link

it was all pretty boring really.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:19 (nineteen years ago) link

not like now

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:20 (nineteen years ago) link

Both The Viper Room and Ned Raggett are over 350 miles away from SF.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:23 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to go for a pint with Garu G, all the other menks can fook off.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Both The Viper Room and Ned Raggett are over 350 miles away from SF.

It finally takes someone from EDGWARE to point this out.

jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:30 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to go for a pint with Garu G's gran. She seems a go-er.

beanz (beanz), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:33 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to go for a pint with Garu G, all the other menks can fook off.

Getting him to do a poo in your fanny would be the ultimate ILX trophy.

Markelby (Mark C), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:35 (nineteen years ago) link

Some days I really hate ILX. This has been one of the worst.

:-(

It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (kate), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:38 (nineteen years ago) link

been there, done that.

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:38 (nineteen years ago) link

It's certainly not been a good day for accurate geography, I grant you that.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:39 (nineteen years ago) link

Imagine if there was a Viper Room in Graeme Park, eh? EH?

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:41 (nineteen years ago) link

Shh dear.

Raston Warrior Robot (alix), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:43 (nineteen years ago) link

There's a Viper Room in Dublin.

accentmonkey (accentmonkey), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:49 (nineteen years ago) link

I want to go for a pint with Garu G, all the other menks can fook off.
Getting him to do a poo in your fanny would be the ultimate ILX trophy.
-- Markelby (boyincorduro...), July 26th, 2005 4:35 PM. (Mark C) (later)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Some days I really hate ILX. This has been one of the worst.
:-(
-- It Is What A Man Does Which Demeans Him, Not What Is Done To Him (masonicboo...), July 26th, 2005 4:38 PM. (kate) (later)
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
been there, done that.
-- Homosexual II (mandeewrigh...), July 26th, 2005 4:38 PM. (Homosexual II) (later)

xpost or no?

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:54 (nineteen years ago) link

It finally takes someone from EDGWARE to point this out.

EDGWARE is a state of mind.

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:55 (nineteen years ago) link

you know what i have to say about edgware

also, ken, it was an xpost

Homosexual II (Homosexual II), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Ken C, you're on form! (x-post: re earlier posts)

It's all true, as well, about those box sets that no-one bought!

the bellefox, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 15:56 (nineteen years ago) link

Mandee, that's outrageous.

Sociah T Azzahole (blueski), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:00 (nineteen years ago) link

(I'm not leaving the board. I've got no issues with ilxors. I'm really uncertain as to when I'll go to a FAP again, I'm not "not coming" if you know what I mean. Sorry, I just feel weird about being elusive when I could easily not be, or maybe it's not easy.)

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:02 (nineteen years ago) link

Raggett was there when River Phoenix died

gear (gear), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:06 (nineteen years ago) link

by "there" I mean driving down the 710 listening to Loveless

gear (gear), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:06 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned can't drive!

Adam In Real Life (nordicskilla), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned doesn't like Loveless.

jel -- (jel), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:07 (nineteen years ago) link

Ned is just Brent Spiner's E-Persona.

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:08 (nineteen years ago) link

It's just the e-talking.

BARMS, Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:20 (nineteen years ago) link

you're all fucking e-ejits.

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

(kidding!)

ken c (ken c), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:21 (nineteen years ago) link

KEN C. HOEK

Tumililingan (ex machina), Tuesday, 26 July 2005 16:25 (nineteen years ago) link

the reason for the bad blood between Graham and most other London ILX people is very little to do with his online behaviour

hmmm, I have been known to be quiet and awkward and hang around ppl without contributing to conversations much or at all in my time. Quite possibly this has freaked ppl put and they've wished I'd gone away. On the other hand, I have never delierately thrown wine or any other beverage over somebody deliberately and if Graham had done this to me I would definitely had punched him or kicked his ass. No desire to stir things up here - if ppl want to email me privately on the subject to explain more (seeing as I wasn't at the memorial FAP to witness the unpleasantness) then pls do so; the email address below works.

MarkH (MarkH), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 21:28 (nineteen years ago) link

Both The Viper Room and Ned Raggett are over 350 miles away from SF.

Well, that explains it now, doesn't it?

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 21:38 (nineteen years ago) link

Also:

Ned can't drive!

M. White (Miguelito), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 21:39 (nineteen years ago) link

55!!!!!!

nickn (nickn), Wednesday, 27 July 2005 22:47 (nineteen years ago) link


You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.