"Hey, if you want you can copy my post (with my message board link) and post it on ILX...I've been banned from there...I know how much they love Rockism over there and I'm sure that would ruffle some feathers..."
"Heres my list of the 13 essential albums you need know, frontward adn back, if you want to consider yoruself a Rockist:
Beatles ~ Sgt PepperBeatles ~ Abbey RoadBob Dylan ~ The FreeWheelin Bob DylanNeil Young ~ DecadeThe Clash ~ Combat RockPink Floyd ~ Pipers at the gates of DawnLiz Phair ~ Exile in GuyvilleBlack Sabbath ~ Paranoidled Zeppelin ~ IREM ~ ChronicTownNirvana ~ NevermindVelvet Underground ~ VUThe Who ~ Who's Next
These are the bare minimum. Chronologically they run from 1962 to 1993. (Yes, that means that I dont think there has been a significant Rockism album made in the last 12 plus years--but I'm open for debate). There are only three female band members here; Liz Phair, Nico and Mo Tucker, No blacks, no hispanics, no asians, no arabs. 7 of the 13 albums are from British acts, and one is from a Canadian. 7 albums are from the 60s, 2 from the 90s, 2 from the 80s and just two from the 70s (even though the 70s were in fact the greatest Rock decade of all!). There are a several other albums that came very close to making the list; Pavements Slanted and Enchanted, the Talking Head Remain in Light, and Stereolabs Space Age Batchelor Pad Music, Love's Forever Changes, the Replacements Pleased to Meet Me, etc."
Let me, Steve, say that I have no association or opinion about this list whatsoever. Please direct all comments to not-me.
― less-than three's Christiane F. (drowned in milk), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:34 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:35 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:37 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
WID A LITTLE BIT O'LUCK, WE GONE MAKE IT TROO DI NIGHT
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Steve Shasta (Steve Shasta), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
DO YOU RUN A B&B?
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:41 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Sterling Clover (s_clover), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:42 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
XP
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.musicate.org/Assets/Images/Project/Children%20holding%20hands%20up.JPG
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:43 (eighteen years ago)
― A-ron Hubbard (Hurting), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:44 (eighteen years ago)
― struttin' with some barbecue (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:44 (eighteen years ago)
http://45toursnazes.free.fr/Haut.JPG
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:45 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
1 group member
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:46 (eighteen years ago)
See:Post-Rock or Jazz RockCan someone explain 'Emo' to me?Does Postpunk even actually exist?
Suddenly, a wave of regret rushed over Christiane F.'s naive little body...
― less-than three's Christiane F. (drowned in milk), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
We all have different measures of quality. Admittedly, the Ramones have put out some poor product in their day, but they have also produced a lot of quality.
Why are they of quality?
They were very unique and original and they also had a lot of energy ofcourse, but being unique and original doesnt neccesarily equate to quality, nor does having lots of energy automatically equate to quality. No, what classified the Ramones as quality was that their music went straight to the very core of what Rock music is all about. From the time we are rocked to sleep as little babies, motion and movement have been sources of soothing and comfort. The Ramones music is like that. It is an assault on the mind that ignites the need for motion. At least it does for me. Listening to '53rd and 3rd' or 'I wanna be sedated' swells up the urge in me to stick my steel toed boot into some overfed fratboys smiley face and then go fuck a lonely fat chick like my dick was a broken perculator stuck on the 'High' setting. Then the song ends and I remember that I'm not in college anymore. But at least for a few fleeting moments, the Ramones are able to move me and that, in my opinion, is why they are quality...
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:47 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:48 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:49 (eighteen years ago)
I certainly have no plan to own this rubbish ever.
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:50 (eighteen years ago)
― No Suntan, No Credibility (noodle vague), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:52 (eighteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:55 (eighteen years ago)
― bernard snow (sixteen sergeants), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 19:57 (eighteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:02 (eighteen years ago)
― nabisco (nabisco), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:03 (eighteen years ago)
― Edward III (edward iii), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:08 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:12 (eighteen years ago)
-- Space Gourmand (papiermachealamphibia...), September 19th, 2006. (Haberdager) (later)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:19 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:30 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:37 (eighteen years ago)
― mookieproof (mookieproof), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:42 (eighteen years ago)
― Erroneous Botch (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Erroneous Botch (joseph cotten), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 20:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:38 (eighteen years ago)
― struttin' with some barbecue (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:40 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago)
― struttin' with some barbecue (jimnaseum), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:46 (eighteen years ago)
Only if by "dude" you mean "Tim Gane":
http://eil.com/newGallery/Stereolab-Space-Age-Batchel-318482.jpg
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:48 (eighteen years ago)
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:49 (eighteen years ago)
― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:51 (eighteen years ago)
― Mark (MarkR), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:54 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Mike Dixn (Mike Dixon), Tuesday, 19 September 2006 21:59 (eighteen years ago)
Last of all, this list of albums is a work in progress. I'm seriously considering adding the Woodstock soundtrack and the Saturday Night Fever soundtrack, because both of those soundtracks had a major influence on Rocists thinking--both positive and negative.So dont think this list is the list of the best Rock albums of all time--because it isnt. What it is, is a list of albums that is essential for a Rockists to understand. 13 albums that have shaped Rockists thought, that have changed, defined or created something important to Rock...
I'll know open the floor up for questions...
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Igor Adkins (Grodd), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:13 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:19 (eighteen years ago)
― H2-H4 (H2-H4), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:24 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:31 (eighteen years ago)
― Eppy (Eppy), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:45 (eighteen years ago)
― davina q (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:50 (eighteen years ago)
― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 21 September 2006 03:57 (eighteen years ago)
The reason I banned him the first time was that he was c&p-ing the same questions across different interweb forums - which is OK, obviously, but then he was also c&p-ing the same (sometimes quite long) answers, which I thought kind of strongly implied that he didn't give one fuck about what anyone here actually had to say in their replies, and which I think makes one more of a spammer than a poster. I can't remember how long a ban I slung on him, he might have changed ISPs, or the ban might have expired.
He doesn't seem to be doing the c&p thing anymore - at least not on any other forum I'm on, and googling phrases from his replies doesn't bring anything up.
If the guy annoys you (which I can understand 100% after that what-the-holy-fuck-were-you-thinking-of "let's reclaim "rockist" like black ppl reclaimed 'n-r' line, above) then NB that he seems to have abandoned SoS forum after his wird-for-word identical postings there were met w/indifference, bafflement, very, very faint hostility. Be thankful the guy isn't a 9/11 "truth" kook, I guess :/
Also, search by IP is fucked at the moment, so I can't tell if his current IP is unique, or shared w/other posters.
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Everything Is Ill-Educated (noodle vague), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:35 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.valdoonican.org.uk/rockgen.jpg
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Pashmina (Pashmina), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Everything Is Ill-Educated (noodle vague), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 21 September 2006 08:41 (eighteen years ago)
He's still doing that to some extent. The original question and the main gist of his reply are taken from his myspace board, on the "What is Rockism" thread:
http://groups.myspace.com/httpwwwmyspacecompaulewagemann
Any catagory of Rock you can think of is discussed here by all of the world's leading experts on the subject
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Everything Is Ill-Educated (noodle vague), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:22 (eighteen years ago)
That's a reasonably salient point. Still a raving fucking moron though.
― Sick Mouthy (Nick Southall), Thursday, 21 September 2006 09:38 (eighteen years ago)
I guess the most controversial aspect of my posts on Rockism is the aspect that confronts racism. Do I think Rockism is racists?No.Do I think Rock music is mostly made for caucasions and by caucasions?Yes.Do I have a hard time understanding, why anyone would think that by me stating this fact makes me a racist?Yes.Do I think 'white guilt' is funking ridiculas?Yes.Does my spelling suck?Ofcourse.
One thing that makes me confident in talking about black/white race relations is that I have alot of ties and interactions with blacks, black communities, black culture. Same goes for Hispanic culture/communities. Race does play apart in our existence. It's reality and I dont find anything wrong with acknowledging that. I've wanted very much to like Rap/HipHop. I've listened to all the big artists, all the loved artists, and its very rare that I find anything that I want to listen to. Is that a race thing? I dont think so. Becasue I like the Blues and I like Soul.So is it a cultural thing? Perhaps.But mostly it is a Rockist thing.Rap/HipHop (and Funk imo) music doesnt Rock. I dont find rap/hip authenic in general. There are some interesting sounds, beats, etc. But listening to them is similar to listening to Radiohead or some lame Prog Rock for me--its just not authentic and doesnt reach me where it counts...
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Thursday, 21 September 2006 14:37 (eighteen years ago)
― Marcello Carlin (nostudium), Thursday, 21 September 2006 14:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Fetchboy (Felcher), Thursday, 21 September 2006 14:47 (eighteen years ago)
http://my.opera.com/IrGXaNa/homes/albums/19701/I%20Give%20Up.jpg
― mark 0 (mark 0), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:07 (eighteen years ago)
this guy could be a meme machine
― deej.. (deej..), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:22 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:38 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:39 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:41 (eighteen years ago)
That's what I've said before. How can Rockism be racists, when many of the founding fathers were blacks?
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Thursday, 21 September 2006 15:49 (eighteen years ago)
― mark 0 (mark 0), Thursday, 21 September 2006 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Everything Is Ill-Educated (noodle vague), Thursday, 21 September 2006 16:01 (eighteen years ago)
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Thursday, 21 September 2006 16:04 (eighteen years ago)
50 Sea Cadets are sailingTo a place where no one sails toThey'll probably raise five grandThere but for the grace of Riot Grrrl go youSo give what you can
To the... deep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealTonight
See the gutsy lady mayoressSteer the luge to new dimensionsBeam with local prideDeck quoits with the French trance vetsCome one come all
At the New Romantic craft fairTry and guess the alien's weight"25 pence says you can't"A ton of volleyballs, top refereesWill keep us all informed
At the...deep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealDeep house victims minibus appealTonight
Stripped Italian speedcoreNew wave of righteous of righteous handbagWhat;s your contributioTo deep house victimsDeep house victimsDeep house victimsDeep house victims minibus appeal...
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Thursday, 21 September 2006 16:14 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Thursday, 21 September 2006 16:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Geir Hongro (GeirHong), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:36 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:38 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:41 (eighteen years ago)
― Thomas Tallis (Tommy), Thursday, 21 September 2006 20:43 (eighteen years ago)
― Wrinklepossum's Awesome Blossom (Wrinklepaws), Friday, 22 September 2006 00:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 01:03 (eighteen years ago)
― nate p. (natepatrin), Friday, 22 September 2006 01:09 (eighteen years ago)
― marc h. (marc h.), Friday, 22 September 2006 01:38 (eighteen years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 22 September 2006 02:45 (eighteen years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 22 September 2006 02:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Friday, 22 September 2006 02:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 22 September 2006 02:58 (eighteen years ago)
― a|ex (Pareene), Friday, 22 September 2006 04:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Harthill Services (Neil Willett), Friday, 22 September 2006 04:50 (eighteen years ago)
Paul McCartney-Liverpool OratorioGeorge Harrison- Gone TroppoBob Dylan ~ and the DeadNeil Young ~ Are You Passionate?The Clash ~ Cut the CrapPink Floyd ~ The Division BellLiz Phair ~ whitechocolatespaceeggBlack Sabbath ~ Never Say Die!Kingdom Come- Kingdom ComeREM ~ MonsterNirvana ~ NevermindVelvet Underground ~ SqueezeThe Who ~ Join Together
― ramon fernandez (ramon fernandez), Friday, 22 September 2006 12:13 (eighteen years ago)
But as for my understanding, anti-rockism is a movement started in the 50s that tried to ban that Satanic Rock music and keep Elvis's pelvis from being seen on TV. Anti-Rockism evolved throughout the 60s as the FBI and (strom thurman) tried to boot Lennon from the US and hits its peak in the 80s with Tipper Gore's mothers-agaisnst-rock (or whatever the hell that organization was called)...SO I think a true anti-rock list would have Twisted Sister, Prince, and certainly some Marilyn Manson...
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Friday, 22 September 2006 12:32 (eighteen years ago)
― Dedicated to Jaggers Who Do Drive-Bys (noodle vague), Friday, 22 September 2006 12:35 (eighteen years ago)
― lexurian (lexurian), Friday, 22 September 2006 12:52 (eighteen years ago)
― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 22 September 2006 13:23 (eighteen years ago)
what happened to The Stones and Springsteen? Clapton, etc? there's loads more core rockist touchstones than some artists on your list. and the rockists I've met would definitely NOT choose Piper over later Floyd albums.
― Paul (scifisoul), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:16 (eighteen years ago)
― Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Friday, 22 September 2006 15:30 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul (scifisoul), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Dr. Alicia D. Titsovich (sexyDancer), Friday, 22 September 2006 16:21 (eighteen years ago)
This sentence is marvelous.
― Alfred, Lord Sotosyn (Alfred Soto), Friday, 22 September 2006 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 22 September 2006 17:11 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Friday, 22 September 2006 19:24 (eighteen years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:29 (eighteen years ago)
― and PappaWheelie, author of Have You Ever Been Poxy Fuled? (PappaWheelie 2), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
― M@tt He1geson: Real Name, No Gimmicks (Matt Helgeson), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:34 (eighteen years ago)
― and PappaWheelie, author of Have You Ever Been Poxy Fuled? (PappaWheelie 2), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:40 (eighteen years ago)
― Squirrel_Police (Squirrel_Police), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:43 (eighteen years ago)
SMELL THE GLOVE
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:44 (eighteen years ago)
xpost
― and PappaWheelie, author of Have You Ever Been Poxy Fuled? (PappaWheelie 2), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:45 (eighteen years ago)
When it comes to Prog Rock, the names most often mentioned are either the dinosuars from the 70s like Pink Floyd, King Crimson, Genesis, Yes, Jethro Tull, Emerson Lake and Palmer, Frank Zappa, Hawkwind, Rush or else those from the nu-school of 90's prog like Radiohead, Phish, Sigur Ros, Mars Volta, Tool, Muse.
Often left out of the discussion is a band that scored a dozen Top 40 hits out of the windy city known as Styx. (notice that funny spelling...)
― gear (gear), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:52 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:53 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:56 (eighteen years ago)
― Space Gourmand (Haberdager), Friday, 22 September 2006 21:58 (eighteen years ago)
my standard def of rockism for years has been:thick people what don't get pop
― Paul (scifisoul), Saturday, 23 September 2006 00:52 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Saturday, 23 September 2006 01:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Colonel Poo (Colonel Poo), Saturday, 23 September 2006 01:06 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Saturday, 23 September 2006 01:15 (eighteen years ago)
Only 'cuz the niggers won't have me.
― js (honestengine), Saturday, 23 September 2006 01:34 (eighteen years ago)
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Saturday, 23 September 2006 02:06 (eighteen years ago)
― gear (gear), Saturday, 23 September 2006 02:30 (eighteen years ago)
:-P
Whereas grunge was looking back in alot of ways, there were those who were either living in the moment or looking ahead. Pavement is the perfect example of this.
XD
Quit trying to be a hipster and just admit that you know all the clues to the Paul is Dead conspiracy,
:-)
that as a teenager you got stoned and synched up Dark Side of the Moon CD with the video of The Wizard of Oz and was freaked out by the part with the monkeys
¯\(o_º)/¯
and that you've actually head banged to Nirvana while hearing it on your car radio.
:-/
Social welfare? There's no better way of keeping someone from achieving their potential than to give them hand outs and freebies. I'm all for evening the playing field and creating a society where everyone has the opportunity to achieve their dreams and reach their full potential, but government handouts do more harm than good and often just crush an ego and enable people to suck the tit of those who are actually making a living and paying taxes...
:-X
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Saturday, 23 September 2006 10:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Dedicated to Jaggers Who Do Drive-Bys (noodle vague), Saturday, 23 September 2006 12:02 (eighteen years ago)
So to the person who wrote this I ask them this: ~Do you consider Eric B's sample or James Browns original to be ROck?and this:~DO you consider Aerosmith or Zeppelin's adaptation to be Rock?
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Saturday, 23 September 2006 13:47 (eighteen years ago)
a) Because of my age and upbringing, I naturally see everything through the prism of rock. YMMV.
b) We've collected a hell of a lot of genre descriptions and such over the years, and they're all useful, but only as descriptive tools. The music itself is a result of so much crosspollination that it's ludicrous to put things into little boxes; those little boxes are the result of the media industries' creation of false marketing niches, a practice that dates back to the early decades of the recording industry.
You're buying into the false niches, like a good little consumer.
It may not have been called "rock" in the days of Bing Crosby and Bessie Smith, but they were creating their version of rock in the 1920's; a crowd of people dancing to Luda and "Gasolina" at a club or party may think of "rock" as that very narrow array of crap that you've bought into, but they're rockin' nonetheless.
I hate to be impolite, but please go away. And please rename your crusade to something that doesn't suck all the fun out of a word that's already taken.
[And Pete fucking Wylie to thread.]
And yes, there is a racist component to this: the notion of "race music" versus "good music" is, again, nearly as old as the record industry, and still exists today. This is not to say that you're a racist, just that this construct has been forever built into our mass-mediated perception of what popular music is. You're probably not a racist, but you are, it seems, as thick as rock's river is wide.
NP: The Allman Brothers Band, "In Memory of Elizabeth Reed"
― mark 0 (mark 0), Saturday, 23 September 2006 15:01 (eighteen years ago)
― js (honestengine), Saturday, 23 September 2006 16:07 (eighteen years ago)
― mark 0 (mark 0), Saturday, 23 September 2006 16:10 (eighteen years ago)
― js (honestengine), Saturday, 23 September 2006 17:04 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Saturday, 23 September 2006 21:16 (eighteen years ago)
The street kids called it "niggger marker", because they've reclaimed the word now.
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Saturday, 23 September 2006 21:27 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Saturday, 23 September 2006 21:29 (eighteen years ago)
― tzarathustra (Tzarathustra), Saturday, 23 September 2006 22:56 (eighteen years ago)
!
― Tim Ellison (Tim Ellison), Saturday, 23 September 2006 23:32 (eighteen years ago)
Do I think you can be a Rockist and mostly like hip hop?Sure. But you still need to understand the history of Rock. You still need to know the social impact Rock has had on Western culture. You still have to be able to define 'qaulity' in terms that were originally laid out by Rock's founding fathers and greatest innovators. HipHop/Rap CAN Rock. It is just my opinion that it doesnt--or at least 99.999999% of the time it doesnt...
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Sunday, 24 September 2006 00:11 (eighteen years ago)
― H2-H4 (H2-H4), Sunday, 24 September 2006 00:12 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Sunday, 24 September 2006 00:25 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Sunday, 24 September 2006 01:02 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Sunday, 24 September 2006 01:17 (eighteen years ago)
― PappaWheelie says, ''only pick any'' (PappaWheelie 2), Sunday, 24 September 2006 02:18 (eighteen years ago)
― Hoosteen (Hoosteen), Sunday, 24 September 2006 02:33 (eighteen years ago)
$1500 / copy m4riss4 style
― a name means a lot just by itself (lfam), Sunday, 24 September 2006 02:53 (eighteen years ago)
― 0xDOX0RNUTX0RX0RSDABITFIELDXOR^0xDEADBEEFDEADBEEF00001 (donut), Sunday, 24 September 2006 02:55 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Sunday, 24 September 2006 03:03 (eighteen years ago)
Yeah, I guess if there was any doubt at all left that the guy's a fake...
― Daniel_Rf (Daniel_Rf), Sunday, 24 September 2006 09:42 (eighteen years ago)
Fulfilling the twin goals of making kids dance and getting musicians laid? I'd say that 99.9999999999999999999999999999999999999% of rap does that.
― js (honestengine), Sunday, 24 September 2006 13:23 (eighteen years ago)
― Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Sunday, 24 September 2006 13:57 (eighteen years ago)
― PappaWheelie says, ''only pick any'' (PappaWheelie 2), Sunday, 24 September 2006 15:09 (eighteen years ago)
― Peter The Pill (Grodd), Sunday, 24 September 2006 15:14 (eighteen years ago)
In the terms of rock's founding fathers, yes.
Your attempts to redefine the goals of "the founding fathers of rock" has more to do with not getting the answers you want than anythin they did.
ps: Your list sucks.
― js (honestengine), Sunday, 24 September 2006 17:09 (eighteen years ago)
― PappaWheelie says, ''only pick any'' (PappaWheelie 2), Sunday, 24 September 2006 17:26 (eighteen years ago)
― Young Fresh Danny D (Dan Perry), Sunday, 24 September 2006 17:44 (eighteen years ago)
Your post advocates a( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (x) vigilanteapproach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected(x) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money(x) It is defenseless against brute force attacks( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it( ) Users of email will not put up with it( ) Microsoft will not put up with it( ) The police will not put up with it( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers(x) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists(x) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or businessSpecifically, your plan fails to account for( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email(x) Open relays in foreign countries( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses(x) Asshats( ) Jurisdictional problems( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches( ) Extreme profitability of spam( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft(x) Technically illiterate politicians(x) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering( ) Outlookand the following philosophical objections may also apply:(x) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have everbeen shown practical( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation( ) Blacklists suck( ) Whitelists suck(x) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually( ) Sending email should be free(x) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses(x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome( ) I don't want the government reading my email( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enoughFurthermore, this is what I think about you:( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.(x) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn yourhouse down!
( ) technical ( ) legislative ( ) market-based (x) vigilante
approach to fighting spam. Your idea will not work. Here is why it won't work. (One or more of the following may apply to your particular idea, and it may have other flaws which used to vary from state to state before a bad federal law was passed.)
( ) Spammers can easily use it to harvest email addresses( ) Mailing lists and other legitimate email uses would be affected(x) No one will be able to find the guy or collect the money(x) It is defenseless against brute force attacks( ) It will stop spam for two weeks and then we'll be stuck with it( ) Users of email will not put up with it( ) Microsoft will not put up with it( ) The police will not put up with it( ) Requires too much cooperation from spammers(x) Requires immediate total cooperation from everybody at once( ) Many email users cannot afford to lose business or alienate potential employers( ) Spammers don't care about invalid addresses in their lists(x) Anyone could anonymously destroy anyone else's career or business
Specifically, your plan fails to account for
( ) Laws expressly prohibiting it( ) Lack of centrally controlling authority for email(x) Open relays in foreign countries( ) Ease of searching tiny alphanumeric address space of all email addresses(x) Asshats( ) Jurisdictional problems( ) Unpopularity of weird new taxes( ) Public reluctance to accept weird new forms of money( ) Huge existing software investment in SMTP( ) Susceptibility of protocols other than SMTP to attack( ) Willingness of users to install OS patches received by email( ) Armies of worm riddled broadband-connected Windows boxes( ) Eternal arms race involved in all filtering approaches( ) Extreme profitability of spam( ) Joe jobs and/or identity theft(x) Technically illiterate politicians(x) Extreme stupidity on the part of people who do business with spammers( ) Dishonesty on the part of spammers themselves( ) Bandwidth costs that are unaffected by client filtering( ) Outlook
and the following philosophical objections may also apply:
(x) Ideas similar to yours are easy to come up with, yet none have everbeen shown practical( ) Any scheme based on opt-out is unacceptable( ) SMTP headers should not be the subject of legislation( ) Blacklists suck( ) Whitelists suck(x) We should be able to talk about Viagra without being censored( ) Countermeasures should not involve wire fraud or credit card fraud( ) Countermeasures should not involve sabotage of public networks( ) Countermeasures must work if phased in gradually( ) Sending email should be free(x) Why should we have to trust you and your servers?( ) Incompatiblity with open source or open source licenses(x) Feel-good measures do nothing to solve the problem( ) Temporary/one-time email addresses are cumbersome( ) I don't want the government reading my email( ) Killing them that way is not slow and painful enough
Furthermore, this is what I think about you:
( ) Sorry dude, but I don't think it would work.(x) This is a stupid idea, and you're a stupid person for suggesting it.( ) Nice try, assh0le! I'm going to find out where you live and burn yourhouse down!
― rock u like a § (ex machina), Sunday, 24 September 2006 18:16 (eighteen years ago)
http://www.prowrestlingguerrilla.com/roster/pics/punk.gif
"Rockism means I'm better than you"
― Sadly, he will be the next Alexis Petridish. (Dom Passantino), Sunday, 24 September 2006 18:46 (eighteen years ago)
― Marmot (marmotwolof), Sunday, 24 September 2006 18:49 (eighteen years ago)
― boney (b0n3y), Sunday, 24 September 2006 23:15 (eighteen years ago)
― Run Ruud Run (Ken L), Sunday, 24 September 2006 23:38 (eighteen years ago)
Steve, could you do me a favor and let some of my "fans" at ILX.com know I've finished my much anticipated blog about Tribute band frontmen?
http://blog.myspace.com/paulewagemann
The rock gods will look down upon you kindly if you do...
― less-than three's Christiane F. (drowned in milk), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 19:17 (eighteen years ago)
― You've Got Scourage On Your Breath (Haberdager), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 19:19 (eighteen years ago)
― PRKLTR (flezaffe), Tuesday, 21 November 2006 20:47 (eighteen years ago)
-- Paul Edward Wagemann (PaulEdwardWagemann), Thursday, 21 September 2006 04:04 (1 year ago) Bookmark Link
^^^beginning to think PEW was a better troll than CMan
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:30 (seventeen years ago)
He's more a comparison point to Geir.
― Mark G, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:32 (seventeen years ago)
except geir is at least aware
― PappaWheelie V, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:37 (seventeen years ago)
http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o170/ROCKISM_101/rockism101copy.jpg
if you would like to become a Rockism101 girl simply send us a photo of you with the words 'Rockism101' spelled across your butt with lipstick--or if you dont have enough room on your butt for 'Rockism101' then 'R101' will suffice).
― DavidM, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:54 (seventeen years ago)
what
― elan, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:56 (seventeen years ago)
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clivebillson/gallery/img9.jpg
― Just got offed, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:58 (seventeen years ago)
shoulda been a poll
― s1ocki, Monday, 23 June 2008 16:59 (seventeen years ago)
http://s120.photobucket.com/albums/o170/ROCKISM_101/
― elan, Monday, 23 June 2008 17:01 (seventeen years ago)
I was asked by Mr. Wagemenn personally to post this.
^^missed meme opportunity
― M@tt He1ges0n, Monday, 23 June 2008 17:06 (seventeen years ago)
omg rockism101.jpg
― The Reverend, Monday, 23 June 2008 19:20 (seventeen years ago)
oh man the PEW days
― cutty, Monday, 23 June 2008 19:54 (seventeen years ago)
You know all the "Ban" debates?
PEW was the only one I agreed with!
(some of the rest were after the fact)
― Mark G, Monday, 23 June 2008 20:48 (seventeen years ago)
I am not particularly familiar with "Freewheelin'" or "Chronic Town", I don't like "Exile In Guyville" at all and VU is extremely patchy. So I guess I am no rockist then.
Then again, I have always considered myself a pop fan, but when I say pop fan I mean pop as a musical genre, with strict musical rules, and not as a cultural or sociological phenomenon.
― Geir Hongro, Monday, 23 June 2008 21:44 (seventeen years ago)
I stand corrected...
― PappaWheelie V, Monday, 23 June 2008 21:48 (seventeen years ago)
Oh Geirpaws...
― leavethecapital, Monday, 23 June 2008 23:14 (seventeen years ago)
qaulity
― If Timi Yuro would be still alive, most other singers could shut up, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 07:53 (sixteen years ago)
Anyhow, share your thoughts. What silly things do you get really excited over? -- Mandee, Friday, November 22, 2002 12:04 PM (5 years ago) Bookmark Link]
― If Timi Yuro would be still alive, most other singers could shut up, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 08:00 (sixteen years ago)
See, there is one diff..
Geir's statements invite debate/discussion/fighting/etc.
PEW's ones, at best, elicit a shrug and a 'who cares?'
― Mark G, Tuesday, 24 June 2008 08:19 (sixteen years ago)
PEW looks more like a "punkist" than "rockist" to me. A "rockist" acknowledges Pink Floyd and prog rock, which after all was a result of the English 60s (Beatles et all)
― Geir Hongro, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 00:18 (sixteen years ago)
PEW once accused me of "just overflowing with white guilt" for writing a James Brown RIP blog post.
― BIG HOOS aka the steendriver, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 00:23 (sixteen years ago)
PEW was pretty good at bog-standard trolling, but really awful at race-baiting.
― The stickman from the hilarious "xkcd" comics, Wednesday, 25 June 2008 00:37 (sixteen years ago)
Is this list a joke???
― paigeterner, Wednesday, 8 May 2013 18:44 (twelve years ago)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2TN-kDEKxF0
― Retreat from the Sunship (James Redd and the Blecchs), Wednesday, 8 May 2013 18:46 (twelve years ago)