OK, 700MB Go!... Who has done what years? Who's doing what year? NATE! MATOS! Help

Message Bookmarked

Bookmark Removed

I want to do 1987.. after having done 1978.

Wanna make this the official thread for keeping tabs on the "Go!" club?

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 04:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Nate: 1972, 1977, 1979
Matos: 1980, 1989, 1997. am working on 1970 and 1920-9
Jess posted a 1985 one, did he ever make it or just list it?
DB: 1978, now working on 1987
Sarah Pedal dibbed 1965--still in?
Michael Daddino now working on 1984
others?

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:10 (twenty-one years ago)

oh yeah: Kenan, 1993

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I did a 2002 as well -- poss. the first of these -- though in retrospect it feels really incomplete and I'd ditch some tracks now (that 7L & Esoteric cut is boring, and really, "Hot In Herre" has grown on me since then).

I feel sorta like doing '68, just to see what there is beneath the boomer-rock surface.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:15 (twenty-one years ago)

ALso, Andy K. 1981, right?

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:18 (twenty-one years ago)

1981 and 1994. duh.

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Jess, 1996.

― jaymc (jaymc), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I want 1968.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I haven't done one of these yet, so Nate should let me have it. :-)

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 December 2003 05:55 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw man. See, I picked '68 because that was the year Hugh Masekela's super-awesome long-outta-print self-titled album came out. If I send you a burn of it, think you could include one of the tracks?

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:12 (twenty-one years ago)

I still have dibs on 1974, will pick another year when that is done (circa 2074)

― cinniblount (James Blount), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:13 (twenty-one years ago)

ok!

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm still doing '65, but I'm struggling to find a good method to determine what year things were released. How do the rest of you do it? And do you count single releases or album releases?

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I generally count whichever came first--if a single hit in '70 and the album in '71, it goes on the '70. if, like "Billie Jean," it was an '83 single from an '82 album, it goes to '82. also, I have way too many release dates memorized for my own good. AMG is helpful with this also.

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:34 (twenty-one years ago)

(also liner notes are your friend etc.)

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:34 (twenty-one years ago)

(and let me know if you're interested in any help with '65--I can make tons of recommendations.)

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:35 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, put me down for 1972.

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:53 (twenty-one years ago)

But I already did it

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 1 December 2003 06:55 (twenty-one years ago)

let's get someone to do 1934

― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:00 (twenty-one years ago)

was that the year you were born?

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:07 (twenty-one years ago)

it was the year I turned 40! when life TRULY begins!

― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:09 (twenty-one years ago)

It was also the year the remix was invented

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)

arr missed it there in the beginning

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:15 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, 1973 then

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 1 December 2003 07:23 (twenty-one years ago)

i am thinking about doing a 2000.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 1 December 2003 08:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I was joking around above, but I'd love to see someone do a year like that... or 1917 or whatnot. I don't have the knowledge (beyond some pop & klez stuff)/music collection for it, but perhaps someone could volunteer... AMATEURIST I'M LOOKING AT YOU!

― s1utsky (slutsky), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:15 (twenty-one years ago)

2000 will be done by earlier this evening.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:16 (twenty-one years ago)

fiddo doesn't fuck around. or more like, he fucks around a lot. isn't that twice gene simmon's record?

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Matos, you saw my 1984 short list, right?

Also, I know you're doing a 1920's double-disc set, but I'd still like to do 1927. (Stravinsky's Oedipus Rex and Blind Willie Johnson, yum yum.)

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, I think we should get to work on completing a decade so we offer these nice little CD-R box sets...

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:22 (twenty-one years ago)

waah! db, I'm putting finishing touches to a list for '87 now. Do you mind awfully? I haven't started burning yet

― J eff W (zebedee), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

1970 by week's end. Mike--can we compromise? I've been working on the 20s for months...I could send you a list.

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:43 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll be working on '68 this week.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:45 (twenty-one years ago)

waah! db, I'm putting finishing touches to a list for '87 now. Do you mind awfully? I haven't started burning yet

Jeff, wanna unite our lists and collaborate?

I don't think anyone has truly collaborated on a Go! disc yet, and I think this is a GREAT experiment for this project. Democracy may make us enemies in the end, but I think this will produce a kick-ass 1987 disc... and I think we're generally on the same page musically.

Email me.

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

U+K QUESTION FOR JESS:

Yello "Oh Yeah!"

Orig. from 1985's "Stella", yet only massively popular in 1987 (thanks to "Ferris Bueller's Day Off"). If you are NOT putting this on your comp, I will cheat slightly and snag it.. but only if you're not using it, as 1985 is its "proper" place.

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 19:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, don't worry about it, Matos. There's no reason why there can't be a 20's overview AND seperate ones for each individual year...but that can be fussed over once you finish.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:00 (twenty-one years ago)

but I need ideas! can you email me what you have?

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:01 (twenty-one years ago)

I will mail you tomorrow, db

― Jeff W (zebedee), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Thanks, Jeff. (See, I was hoping a thread like this would have prevented tears in the near future... not that there's any guaranteed lack of them! muahahahahahahahahaa)

― donut bitch (donut), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Matos, check yr e-mail.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Monday, 1 December 2003 20:37 (twenty-one years ago)

Mike, check yours

― M Matos (M Matos), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Okay, I'm going to get down to business tonight. And if anyone knows a place where I can find archives of the French charts, I will be eternally grateful.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:20 (twenty-one years ago)

my claws are clutching at precious 1959, probably ready around the end of 2003.

― rgeary (rgeary), Monday, 1 December 2003 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeff, you know my REAL address, right?

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 07:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Damn, Jess already did 1996 (I just wanted an excuse to include "Swallowed" on something).

Has '91 been done by anyone? (If not, I'm in.)

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 07:34 (twenty-one years ago)

mommy, they're taking all the years I wanted to do!

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 07:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, scratch that. 1991 has too many canonical choices to sift through, I think I'll look for a crappier year ('98?).

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 08:24 (twenty-one years ago)

btw 2000 is done, in case anyone missed it.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 14:01 (twenty-one years ago)

1976, 1986. Due date?

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 15:24 (twenty-one years ago)

And if anyone knows a place where I can find archives of the French charts, I will be eternally grateful

The Hit-Parade national was only created in oct. 1968, but some popular records of the year are listed here

― Bruno- (Bruno-), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)

no, here : http://www.district-parthenay.fr/parthenay/creparth/russeilwi/1968.html

― Bruno- (Bruno-), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:29 (twenty-one years ago)

You mean here. (Sarah's doing 1965.)

― jaymc (jaymc), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Is 1975 or 1971 reserved? Because I want to do one of them after 1984.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael, do 1971.. that's the year I was born. I'd think you'd do an outstanding job. (hint: "things get a little easier... once you understand")

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Heh heh heh. As 1971 is my year too, yes, Mike, go forth.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

NO! NO! NOT THAT SONG!

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:45 (twenty-one years ago)

IT'S TOO LATE! HAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHA!

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Ha! That's 1972.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, but wait...it peaked on the Billboard charts on January 1, 1972! Pretty damned close!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 2 December 2003 23:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Weird.. another source ("The Worst Records" book) says 1971.

And because it peaked on New Years 1972, it HAD to have been released in 1971, no?

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)

please god no MAKE IT STOP!

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:05 (twenty-one years ago)

(HAHAHAHA, goddamn, what a fucked up way to musically ring in 1972. Were people possibly singing this song at New Years parties back then along with "Auld Lang Sine")

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:06 (twenty-one years ago)

"Things get a little EASIER! Once Matos understands!"

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Matos, may I remind you of "The Americans" by Bryan MacGregor, or possibly "Dear Mr. Jesus" by Powersource? Will that make the pain seem relatively small?

Don't make me bring out the big guns like The Escape Club or Robbie Nevil.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Here's where I tried getting Nate to join the DARK SIDE.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

It needs a home, Michael. The song is orphaned. You are that foster parent.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

(The Tom T. Hall and Johnny Nash tracks I suggested are inarguably perfect, however -- even if Nate didn't use 'em.)

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

"Dear Mr. Jesus" is the black hole of popular music, from which vantage point everything looks good.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:15 (twenty-one years ago)

or possibly "Dear Mr. Jesus" by Powersource?

http://hipsterdetritus.blogspot.com/regalspaz.JPG

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

x-post to Michael...Besides, I stole Alex Chilton's "My Rival" from 1979 from Nate for the '78 comp, because he denied it too.. or just never used it.

Matos: see? Mr. Jesus makes everything seem good.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

and I'm still mystified that he didn't use ANYTHING off the first Paul Simon album! or "I Can See Clearly Now"! and and and and and....

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd forgotten COMPLETELY about "Dear Mr. Jesus" until Nate blogged about it. I wrote him a very angry letter afterward. That was over a year ago and I have still not forgiven him.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:17 (twenty-one years ago)

HOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

http://www.jokerstears.com/wrestlers/hacksaw/duggan002.jpg

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)

I don't see how "Dear Mr. Jesus" is more atrocious than something like, oh, Gloria Estefan's "The Words Get In The Way".

HUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUEAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRHHHHHGGGG!!

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)

Don't worry, Matos, just imagine Wayne Coyne's fingernails-on-a-chalkboard voice covering "Dear Mr. Jesus" as a B-side on The Flaming Lips' upcoming critically acclaimed release. Feeling better?

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:21 (twenty-one years ago)

But WAIT! I CAN use this godawful and endless medley by Carol Bunett & Julie Andrews!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd forgotten COMPLETELY about "Dear Mr. Jesus" until Nate blogged about it. I wrote him a very angry letter afterward. That was over a year ago and I have still not forgiven him.

Don't blame me! Blame Ron "Boogiemonster" Gerber for exposing me to it in the first place! (I was playing GTA: Vice City at the time... wotta mindfuck.) More horrifying: apparently it has a b-side.

Also, sorry about the lack of "Me and Julio..." I own the 7", for godsakes, how could I forget it? ("I Can See Clearly Now" = oldies radio "familiarity breeds contempt" situation)

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:29 (twenty-one years ago)

http://www.incorrectmusic.com/gallery/covers/think_understand.jpg

I need a home. :(

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

That 7" has no grooves! (in both senses of the word)

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

4 Hero respectfully disagrees with you, Nate, and invites you to eat their shiz.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

?????

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

4 Hero sampled said song for "Mr Kirk's Nightmare," IIRC.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Have you the heard the ENTIRE song, Nate?

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

OVERDOSE!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Has "Mr Kirk's Nightmare" been used in someone's CD-R?

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

1991 awaits

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Sigh, I will take the blame for this GROSS thread digression. Actually, the thought of my mom and dad jiggling me in their arms during New Years Eve 1971 singing "Things get a little easier" makes me kinda queasy now...

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:47 (twenty-one years ago)

On the brown shag carpet with the flower stickers on the wall...

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd rather they my parents were REALLY just raising the devil sign rocking out to "Archangel Thunderbird" by Amon Duul II and getting REALLY high during the new years' party...

..but I doubt it.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"Flower stickers on the wall/Doesn't bother me at all..."

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:49 (twenty-one years ago)

"HAPPY NEW YEARS FOR OUR NEW BORN SON! Honey, let's put on Yoko Ono's 'Mindtrain' again... "

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)

Holy shit, that 4 Hero track is loony; I plead ignorance and smack myself in the face repeatedly.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 00:55 (twenty-one years ago)

No worries. ONE OF US.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Things did get a little easier once Nate understood.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Shall I hug you or smite you?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:03 (twenty-one years ago)

Michael, This person claims it's 1971

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:05 (twenty-one years ago)

I like the two dead zombie smiley-faces at the bottom of that page.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:06 (twenty-one years ago)

I have a new favorite internet page!

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:07 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh yeah, I don't doubt it was first issued in 1971, but if we count a record as being from year or the other by gauging the year of its greatest impact (which is how I've been operating with my 1984 CD-R, more or less) it's a '72 record by a hair.

Dude, if you want to do '71, that's fine with me!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Shall I hug you or smite you?

Yeah Ned, what is there to life (life, life, life, life, life, life,....)

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

WAH

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:09 (twenty-one years ago)

1971's my ear of birth, but 1974-1975 is the home of my first memories. It'd give me an excuse to remember all that country music I've forgotten.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Aaaaaaaaah, ok, didn't realize your criteria was peak performance.. sorry.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

my ear of birth

I officially adore this typo.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Daddino is CHEATING!!!

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:10 (twenty-one years ago)

Plus 1975 is a 'bad' year by rockcrit standards, hence interesting.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

'75 is a GREAT year by reggae standards, however.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait, did I just imagine some exchange recently, one involving Chuck Eddy where he said this, more or less.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

this = the rule of maximum impact

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:12 (twenty-one years ago)

*sudden thought* Is there anything which could be described as country reggae? I'm sure there is, but what do you all think?

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah yeah yeah, I'm a hardass about this stuff with these Go! CDs. sue me.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Ned: Toots's (magnificent) cover of "Country Roads"

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:13 (twenty-one years ago)

also, the Bellamy Brothers and Willie Nelson did some one-drop-rhythmed stuff

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:14 (twenty-one years ago)

plus, "maximum impact" /= highest chart position. if it had been no. 10 in Dec. 71 and no. 6 in Jan. 72 tie goes to the earlier year. < /high horse>

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:15 (twenty-one years ago)

So, there is an official standard by which to "date" songs for "GO!" discs then? Because not everything I use ever really "peaked" necessarily. I just go by the "(c) 19??" on the record or CD (unless I have prior knowledge of its true origin, because some releases don't get it quite right)

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

"Born to Run" AND "Cylcotron"!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:17 (twenty-one years ago)

so do I. album release before single release = date of album. and vice versa.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)

Back to that "Mr. Music" website for a moment:

"“Norma Rae” is a film I have watched many times, partly because it is outstanding, but mostly because I never tire of hearing Jennifer Warnes sing “Child of a Working Man.” I am, in fact, a child of a working man."

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:18 (twenty-one years ago)

DAMN YOU I WAS GOING TO QUOTE THAT

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

X = X

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Usually I go by copyright dates, except for hits. I think the only mildly controversial things I've done for the '84 CD-R shortlist is including "Let The Music Play" ('83) but leaving off Billy Ocean's "Loverboy" ('84 but peaked later...not as great as I remember it, anyway).

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:20 (twenty-one years ago)

The stuff I've really really been having problems with is African music, where the information about release dates both in records and on the 'net is a tad sketchy.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:24 (twenty-one years ago)

don't get me started on that particular problem ....

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, the problem with mbaqanga is that those great Earthworks comps almost NEVER have dates on them, which is frustrating as all fuck when it comes to stuff like this. right, it doesn't matter when this stuff comes out because it's good now, but, well, you know . . .

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:27 (twenty-one years ago)

The iceberg site especially has been confusing me as far as confirming dates go... let this be a warning to novice "Go!"-phers

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:35 (twenty-one years ago)

matos if you wanted to use "mr. kirk" you should have put it in '89! (i shit you not.) (well, the white label anyway.) (and it was, like, novemeber.) (but still!) (i am floored at how old that song is.)

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:38 (twenty-one years ago)

haha also wtf is up with this thread having more responses than any of the actual list threads!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:39 (twenty-one years ago)

(i have also just outed myself as the BIGGEST NERD EVER by remembering an obscure factoid about when a white label 12" was released.)

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Billy Ocean's "Loverboy"

I know it might not be AS hot but Michael, for the CHORUS ALONE!!!!

― Anthony Miccio (Anthony Miccio), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:43 (twenty-one years ago)

haha also wtf is up with this thread having more responses than any of the actual list threads!

me :(

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 01:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Jeff, you know my REAL address, right?
we'll soon find out, I've just hit 'send' (sorry for delay, I've been really busy workwise of late)

― J eff W (zebedee), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 17:42 (twenty-one years ago)

So I'm claiming 1975, 1967...and maybe 1950. All reet?

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:01 (twenty-one years ago)

one at a time, motherfucker!

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Gosh, OK!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:29 (twenty-one years ago)

If i could possibly claim temporary dibs on 1988 instead of 1987.. I just had a look at Jeff's list, and the task for a collaboration may seem tougher initially than I thought. But I stress "may".

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

(It looks like Jeff has put in a lot of work already on this thing, where as I just started, but I still want to see what could be done.. but who knows.)

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

i am going to do 1459!!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:36 (twenty-one years ago)

fiddo in cold-rocking the Vienna canon shockah!

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:39 (twenty-one years ago)

seriously i was thinking of doing like 1919 so i could list all songs i had never heard or heard of.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

music hall is BACK!!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:42 (twenty-one years ago)

haha I saw a like 9CD Bear Family comp of British music hall at the SF Amoeba this weekend. I was *so tempted* to pick it up.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 19:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Yeah, but fiddo already rocked the Vienna canon 1985 style with Falco, yo

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris Ott: your email bumped back. I don't think anyone's taken '76 or '86, so go ahead w/either.

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

ott is doing a "go!" ?!?!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:08 (twenty-one years ago)

i am filled with the fear

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Sting's "Dream of the Blue Turtles" and the outtakes, as 24-bit stereo wav files. Yup, fearful.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:11 (twenty-one years ago)

hee hee

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 21:12 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I'm doing 1988 instead. It's official. Surely Matos will guard any inaccuracies that creep into '89 for me. But Jeff, I still need to respond to your email and I will tonight.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

So here's what I think is the tally here for the 70s and 80s:

1970 : Matos / in progress
1971 : Unclaimed!
1972 : Patrin / DONE!
1973 : Barrus / in progress
1974 : Blount / in progress
1975 : Daddino / in progress
1976 : Ott / in progress
1977 : Patrin / DONE!
1978 : DBitch / DONE!
1979 : Patrin / DONE!
1980 : Matos / DONE!
1981 : Kellman / DONE!
1982 : Unclaimed!
1983 : Unclaimed!
1984 : Daddino / DONE!
1985 : Harvell / ?????
1986 : Ott / in progress
1987 : Worrell / in progress, close to DONE
1988 : DBitch / in progress
1989 : Matos / DONE!

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Wait a second...I'm still working on the '84 thing!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:21 (twenty-one years ago)

oh..

1984 : Daddino / in progress

oops

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

my 2002 would be so cool! though it's so recent the pressure would be intense

― Ronan (Ronan), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:24 (twenty-one years ago)

1985 MP3 CDR 700MB

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)

1985 : Harvell / DONE!

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:56 (twenty-one years ago)

Nobody's claimed 1982? I MUST CLAIM IT NOW.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 3 December 2003 23:57 (twenty-one years ago)

so Jess, tell me, why is it that NONE OF US have copies of your, oh, THREE discs of this stuff except you? hmmmm?

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:03 (twenty-one years ago)

hee hee.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

that's not totally true, matos: god has one.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:12 (twenty-one years ago)

because god is everywhere.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

especially the theme to "miami vice"

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

btw check yr email

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, merci beaucoup, guys!

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 00:35 (twenty-one years ago)

1982 : Patrin / in progress

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 01:11 (twenty-one years ago)

YAY! "My Old Man's A Fatso" ahoy! (also "Billie Jean")

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 01:25 (twenty-one years ago)

haha I got "You Fucking Assole" on '80! [high-fives Nate]

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

also how is '65 coming, Sarah?

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Now that I've claimed '82, I will BETRAY YOU ALL by including, without shame or embarrassment, Asia's "Heat Of the Moment"! HA HA HA

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:56 (twenty-one years ago)

It is both a great pop song and the source of one of my longest sustained laughs ever (see MST3K's "Overdrawn at the Memory Bank" episode for further details)

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 05:59 (twenty-one years ago)

"Hey! I can sing too!"

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:00 (twenty-one years ago)

AMG (emphasis mine): " "Heat of the Moment"'s slick feel and channeled grandiose shared the charts with songs like Toto's "Rosanna" and Human League's "Don't You Want Me," which represented the early part of the decade's light fluff and new wave's superficialness." OH NO HE DINT

Ned: WHONK

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:01 (twenty-one years ago)

And speak of the devil: apparently "Don't You Want Me" was rereleased in 1982 under the "League Unlimited Orchestra" moniker as an extended seven-minute instrumental remix. Please let this be as great as it reads on paper

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:04 (twenty-one years ago)

How in the world am I going to get 1986 on one CD. Both Julian Cope and Peter Murphy's painful Yamaha Ubu covers?!

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:44 (twenty-one years ago)

It's coming, master!

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 06:50 (twenty-one years ago)

hey, I like this master stuff!

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 08:19 (twenty-one years ago)

(I wasn't trying to rush you, btw, was just curious)

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 08:21 (twenty-one years ago)

Believe me, it's worth the wait. This is going to be fantastic.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 08:25 (twenty-one years ago)

I was torturing Matos all night tonight with the ~~threat~~thought of putting "Kokomo" on the 1988 one. Serously, he was writhing. I have so much power.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 09:01 (twenty-one years ago)

[[twitches]]

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 09:02 (twenty-one years ago)

(DB this '78 thing plays like a dream)

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 09:03 (twenty-one years ago)

NO DONUT BITCH, NO

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 09:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey Matos, if you have any suggestions for the '65 mix you should e-mail them NOW.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 09:53 (twenty-one years ago)

Power? Power is having "That's What Friends Are For" and "The Greatest Love of All" in your pocket. Don't test me. :)

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:08 (twenty-one years ago)

right now, Pedal? probably too late, but don't forget "Jaan Pehechaan Ho"

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:11 (twenty-one years ago)

oh, and incidentally: C700 GO! 1970

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:13 (twenty-one years ago)

YES DONUT BITCH YES

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

BODIES IN THE SAAAAAAAAAND...

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 13:14 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh, re: 1965. Please put Sounds Orchestral's "Cast Your Fate to the Wind." Thank you in advance.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 14:20 (twenty-one years ago)

can i just chime in with how unbelievably fucking awesome andy kxllmxn's 1981 is? thank you.

― geeta (geeta), Thursday, 4 December 2003 15:04 (twenty-one years ago)

"Kokomo" is far from being the worst Beach Boys ever. There's at least one song on every Beach Boys album ever released that's worse than "Kokomo".. except "Pet Sounds", "Smiley Smile", and maybe "Sunflower".

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 16:01 (twenty-one years ago)

Calling Patrin: please email me re: 1976/1977.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 16:22 (twenty-one years ago)

I didn't do '76, but okay

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 16:49 (twenty-one years ago)

i volunteer to do 1982 or 1983 (not sure which yet!)

― geeta (geeta), Thursday, 4 December 2003 16:58 (twenty-one years ago)

I already claimed '82, so hooray

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:12 (twenty-one years ago)

has anyone claimed 93? cuz otherwise its MINE.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:15 (twenty-one years ago)

Matos: I remembered and it was one of the first things I added. Any other ideas, then?

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:31 (twenty-one years ago)

oh yeah keenan did 93 but pfft fuck that he didnt have one jungle track. REDUX.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Yes, Sarah. To repeat: Sounds Orchestral's "Cast Your Fate to the Wind." (1965 Muzakification of a Latiny Vince Guaraldi song -- awesome.)

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Geeta, if you do '83, we have to conspire together to decide which Hall & Oates track goes on what CD-R.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Nate, I'm doing 76-- wanted to see your 77 list to avoid duplication.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 18:18 (twenty-one years ago)

93 currently has 81 tracks and i havent even gotten out of the jungle yet. it's gonna have to be a double disc, i think.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 18:49 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm in the process of compiling stuff for '82, and I will tell you this: it will include the theme from Moon Patrol.

My '77 mix is here.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:00 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh: dibs on '66 if nobody's claimed it already.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Not a single overlap; mutual accuracy appreciation society.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Daddino: that song isn't showing up on slsk, so could you e-mail it to me so I can give it a listen?

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(I met the guy who created Moon Patrol. He's a bit of a dink.)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:30 (twenty-one years ago)

He better not be playa-hatin' on Sinistar

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Progress report on '68: coming along fabulously.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

He better not be playa-hatin' on Sinistar

beware i live

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 19:35 (twenty-one years ago)

Jode, when slsk gets back on I'll pester you about getting you some Masekela

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:06 (twenty-one years ago)

waah waah i got 145 tracks in and donut bitch told me i couldnt redo 93 waah waah

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:21 (twenty-one years ago)

send me that list, fiddo!

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

as soon as i type it up, sir.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:29 (twenty-one years ago)

hee hee hee hee hee [[rubs hands together]]

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:35 (twenty-one years ago)

fiddo, i didn't say you couldn't do it, i was just asking you for a LIL' PAAAYYY-SHUNNNZ.. YEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAHHHH.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 21:43 (twenty-one years ago)

Daddino: that song isn't showing up on slsk, so could you e-mail it to me so I can give it a listen?

Will do when I get home!

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

waah waah i got 145 tracks in and donut bitch told me i couldnt redo 93 waah waah

I think when we have each year of the '90's done we should have one big collaborative CD-R with all the '90's stuff everybody missed.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm in the process of compiling stuff for '82, and I will tell you this: it will include the theme from Moon Patrol.

Ooohh! Haruomi Hosono had an album of video game music released in '84 (though his actual involvement in the music itself remains unclear to me), and I'd include it on mine if I could d/l it.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

I have the Video Game Breaks records.. both volumes, some tracks of which are complete theme songs. Also, if you have an RCA cable and MAME.. well, there you go.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 4 December 2003 22:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Most of my favorite old school game themes were from around '81 -- that riff at the beginning of "Galaga" is super choice. But the "Moon Patrol" bit I got is like a 20-second snippet from actual gameplay featuring sporadic sound effects.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 4 December 2003 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

When we have each year of the '90's done we should have one big collaborative CD-R with all the '90's stuff everybody missed.

Yeah, once the box is done, we should have a thread for each decade, tally up a 1 or 2-disc OUTRAGED appendix.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 4 December 2003 23:22 (twenty-one years ago)

Ott makes me larf.

OK, so you guys are onto us (us being Matos and myself).

So Matos and I discussed last night over dinner and punk rock music at the local bar how we wanted to organize something called "MINE THE GAP: THE FORGOTTEN TRACKS" where we would take half decades..(1978-1982 for instance.. however it's best to break up the years), and go through and make CDR700MB of mp3s that "SHOULD" have been on the ones that were done individually.

I came up with a strict process for this, as these lists could theoretically become huge really quickly..

* For each single year, make up a list of ARTISTS -- not songs -- ARTISTS that were left off that year specifically, and choose a song by that artist that was done that year. (Whining about someone choosing the "wrong song" by an artist already used for that year just remains whining and that's that. Sorry.)

* Collect all the lists for each of the years in that half decade, and put it ALL together, and group them by artist -- as surely multiple songs by the same artists will have been submitted.

* Choose ONE song for each artist for each respective artist's list. This is where the fun and bar brawls come in. Who gets to choose which song? I think balancing the years in question should be the biggest priority, followed by just plain popularity or vote after that. (whoever gets to "vote" that is)

* If it's still too big, then we just have to figure out what we love the least, and trim them off the CD.

* tadah... MINE THE GAP: 19XX - 19XX CDR Go! done

What do you think, sirs?

(And yes, Ott's brilliant suggestion to do Meta-MINE THE GAP OUTRAGE CDRs for the MINE THE GAP CD-RS would only shatter the fourth dimension of insanity and musical obsessiveness, but we might actual approach that very frightening gate one day)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:07 (twenty-one years ago)

"one day" = about six weeks from now

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

weeks?

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

also, I must say that DB has a much more systematic approach to this than I do! I was more along the lines of "Nate put 'Hot Stuff' on his '79, so now I'll put 'Bad Girls' on this one!" etc.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

(no not really DB, I was making a funny! see? funny!)

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:11 (twenty-one years ago)

also gotta mention that 78-82 came about as a tip of the hat to Scott Plangenhoef, whose 1978-1982 "Box Set" was a crucial forerunner to all this 700MB madness:

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

"Nate put hot stuff on his 79" = nate is the pimp

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:13 (twenty-one years ago)

and i meant that in the dirtiest way too.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

"Nate put 'Hot Stuff' on his '79, so now I'll put 'Bad Girls' on this one!"

This sounds like a great hip hop lyric actually.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

I also think "voting" is a bit too formal for a thing like this--we should just make claims on the years (alone or in pairs) and go to town.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:14 (twenty-one years ago)

(though at the rate we're hitting right now it wouldn't surprise me if it WERE only six weeks...)

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:16 (twenty-one years ago)

Weeeeell, see that doesn't solve the problem, because if people suggest, say, Rolling Stone songs for 4 of the 5 years, there will still be a huge list, regardless of who claimed which year to fill the gaps. That's the problem. Now, maybe having multiple songs by same artists will be enough, but I predicting the limitation will be necessary, that's all I'm saying.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:18 (twenty-one years ago)

limitation being "one song per artists" that is.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)

well, that's why it's best not to do this by committee--I think it's a given that we'd limit it to one per artist.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:19 (twenty-one years ago)

like if we're doing 78-82 (and we are), we'll just figure out what gaps to cover and go to it. we can cut away overlap. doesn't seem that complicated to me.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:20 (twenty-one years ago)

I just wanted to lay it on the line JUST IN CASE there comes a point of contention. I'm sure the resolution will be a lot smoother than expected, as you describe, M. I just wanted to have lines of defense and rules in case the national Go!rd has to be called in for certain cases. (like, oh, Think's "Once You Understand" apparently)

well, in any case, to avoid offending those who are still working on the comps, we should wait until a solid contiguous run of 5 years have been DONE before thinking about a MINE THE GAP for that half decade. Once Nate closes 82 for instance, there ya go. '78 to '82 can be worked on. I figure that should be the boundary there. so '73-'77 or '83-'87 or '88 to '92, etc.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:25 (twenty-one years ago)

"Once You Understand" isn't anywhere near 78-82, thank god.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:26 (twenty-one years ago)

and yeah, I'm not doing another one for awhile--too much work to do (job-work I mean) and the holidays etc.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

That unholy handjob of a song will have to be revisited once MINE THE GAP: '68-'72 comes around in about, oh, ten days.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

(In any case, I already have some suggestion to fill gaps for '80 and '81. So semi-dibs on, um, both.. please?)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

(or actually change that to '79 and '80)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:38 (twenty-one years ago)

One more rule to add to the above

* Don't suggest songs you can't provide yourself (that's rather obvious, but just wanted it there for the lawyers)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:41 (twenty-one years ago)

god you guys are so gay

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

get a room already!!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:42 (twenty-one years ago)

whatever you say cinno blountington

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:50 (twenty-one years ago)

touche

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:51 (twenty-one years ago)

Status report: plowing though 1973.

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Friday, 5 December 2003 00:56 (twenty-one years ago)

god you guys are so gay
get a room already!!

http://www.networkoneradio.com/rex/rexmain.jpg

SOMEONE's being a bitch today.

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 01:00 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm late here, but to any of you who fancy being the first on your block to include Yezda Urfa or Heldon on your mixes, I'm sharing an "out 70s" comp on slsk. It's something that I had originally done as a 5CDR thing for a friend, and have added to over a little over time. Mostly just out there stuff from the 70s. Username dleone.

― dleone (dleone), Friday, 5 December 2003 01:42 (twenty-one years ago)

"today"

― geeta (geeta), Friday, 5 December 2003 01:44 (twenty-one years ago)

Voila!

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 06:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey fellas and ladies: I've been reading this thread and practically drooling. I'd love to hear any number of these mixes, but I'm afraid I don't have much to offer in return. (This is the thread where I admit I only own 300 CDs.) (I'd also make a mix of my own, but ... see previous parenthetical.) (And I haven't yet bothered to download Slsk for Mac, which seems like a needlessly complicated process.) So, um, I'm admitting to my embarrassing musical deficiencies cuz I really want these. What do I do?

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 December 2003 06:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm bought off quite easily with a big bag of M&M's.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 06:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha! I promise not to eat any of them this time :)

― jaymc (jaymc), Friday, 5 December 2003 06:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Seriously, I need some chocolate so bad right now that I'd probably trade you my original copy of Marquee Moon for some. Help!

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 07:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw yeah, 1966 is well underway, about a third of the way done, but it might have to wait till Monday for completion. It's a monster.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 10:30 (twenty-one years ago)

If nobody's in a rush, I'll do 1968.

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 5 December 2003 10:53 (twenty-one years ago)

JBR's doing '68...I think '69 is unclaimed, though.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 10:58 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I'll have a bash at '69.

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Friday, 5 December 2003 13:07 (twenty-one years ago)

1986 going up this weekend, possibly early as tonight. 1976 proving more difficult as 75/76 is on many levels the Year of Reggae and I've admittedly had to do some reading on that score.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Friday, 5 December 2003 16:12 (twenty-one years ago)

jaymc--some of us accept blank CDRs as trades.

― M Matos (M Matos), Friday, 5 December 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw, man ... shit, I was really eyeing that unclaimed 1969! It's a really interesting year. I should have just asked for it, but I wanted to wait until I got over my backlog of trades before committing to a new project. Plus it's like the end of the psych era and I own a couple thousand psych records. And soul records and jazz records and proto-metal records.

Billy, you should let me have it dude!

― Broheems (diamond), Friday, 5 December 2003 20:30 (twenty-one years ago)

You could do '71 - that one is still unclaimed! I'm kind of drawn to '69, and think I probably have more interesting stuff from that year. Swap with me!

(anyone reading this who I owe a trade to ... it will absolutely be finished this weekend)

― Broheems (diamond), Friday, 5 December 2003 20:32 (twenty-one years ago)

(Dear god, MINE THE GAP: '68 to '72 is happening sooner than we thought! WHAT OF "ONCE YOU UNDERSTAND"? MATOS! IT's COMING! HIDE! AAAAAAAAAAARRRRRRRRRRRHHHHHHGGGGGGGGGGGGG!)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:01 (twenty-one years ago)

< /gay according to jess>

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:02 (twenty-one years ago)

Things get a little faggier, once you become gay.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:03 (twenty-one years ago)

My mix is pretty obscuro-heavy, so there'll be plenty of room for "What kind of idiot does a '68 mix and leaves out [mainstream release]??" style gap-mining.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:09 (twenty-one years ago)

It's your call, but you oughta download some of the year's pop hits you've never heard of before and give them a chance. I found some great stuff that way, as well as several songs I "knew" but wouldn't recognise by name.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:22 (twenty-one years ago)

"gay according to jess" is the name of my new band.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:26 (twenty-one years ago)

that needs an ellipses in there after "gay"

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:40 (twenty-one years ago)

It's your call, but you oughta download some of the year's pop hits you've never heard of before and give them a chance.

Yeah, I've been doing that.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Awesome. We must trade!

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Friday, 5 December 2003 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

okay, as for 1983 -- i'm on it!

― geeta (geeta), Saturday, 6 December 2003 17:22 (twenty-one years ago)

1968: WE'RE A WINNER (a C700 GO! by Jody Beth Rosen)

(ps-- i swore off looking at anyone else's track lists while i was working on my own. now i can finally catch up.)

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Saturday, 6 December 2003 18:15 (twenty-one years ago)

>"gay according to jess" is the name of my new band.
that needs an ellipses in there after "gay"

No, there doesn't.

― donut bitch (donut), Saturday, 6 December 2003 19:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It needs to be between 'according' and 'to'

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Saturday, 6 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Is '71 still unclaimed?

― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Saturday, 6 December 2003 20:51 (twenty-one years ago)

I sort of claimed '71 until I changed my mind and went for '75. So I think it's free, unless db wants it.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 December 2003 21:48 (twenty-one years ago)

i have begun work on 1941. (i am only half-kidding.)

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:09 (twenty-one years ago)

I am finishing 1984, but damn - the sequencing is killing me.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:17 (twenty-one years ago)

this is what being snowbound will do to you.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:19 (twenty-one years ago)

Snowbound?

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)

haha there is 8 inches of snow around my house! i havent left in two days.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:25 (twenty-one years ago)

It's snowing?

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:28 (twenty-one years ago)

oh you.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

I'm going over what I have so far for '82 and, well, I hope you folks really like electro

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Saturday, 6 December 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll take '71, then, if db doesn't.

― Colin Beckett (Colin Beckett), Saturday, 6 December 2003 23:17 (twenty-one years ago)

DAMN IT why did I tell myself not to do another one of these for awhile?! oh yeah because I've made four already have a fifth on the way and am swamped with work, mutter grumble . . .

― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

you know, it might be a good idea to catalogue all the threads/tracklists we've done so far, so here goes:

CDR 700 Go: Love Potion #1965 (Sarah Pedal)
1968: WE'RE A WINNER (a C700 GO! by Jody Beth Rosen) (Bad Jode)
C700 GO! 1970 (M Matos)
This is what I've been doing instead of posting to ILM: CDR700 1972 (Nate Patrin)
CDR700MBGO!: 1977 (Nate Patrin)
CDR700MB Go! 1978 (Donut Bitch)
CDR700MBMP3: 12 and a half hours of 1979 (Nate Patrin)
Mercedes, Young Ladies . . . 1980 (a C700 Go! presentation) (M Matos)
CDR700 Go! 1981 (Andy K)
1985 MP3 CDR 700MB (Gabbo Giftington)
C700 GO! 1989 (M Matos)
POO: 1993 (Kenan Hebert)
here is what i have been doing instead of posting to ilm: CDR700: 1996 (in the grand patrin tradition) (Strongo Hulkington)
1997 MP3 CDR 700MB (M Matos)
Aw shit, it's Strongo Hulkington Presents CDR700MB Go! for the Y2K (Strongo Hulkington)
C650MB: 2002 - 454 Minutes of Madness (Nate Patrin + Stevem--though this isn't quite an "official" deal but more of a prequel to the madness that would become this little weirdo hivemind trendlet of ours)

― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:23 (twenty-one years ago)

And here's a timeline of who's working on what:

1966 Sarah Pedal
1967 Michael Daddino (?)
1969 Billy Dods
1971 Michael Daddino gave it to . . . whom?
1973 Chris Barrus
1974 James Blount (in the works for almost as long as the two mix CDs he's owed me for nearly a year now!)
1975 Michael Daddino
1976 Chris Ott
1982 Nate Patrin
1983 Geeta
1984 Michael Daddino
1986 Chris Ott
1987 Jeff W
1988 Donut Bitch
1990 unclaimed! [[oh Ne-ed...]]
1991 Miloauckerman
1992 unclaimed!
1995 unclaimed!
1998 unclaimed!
1999 unclaimed!
2001 unclaimed! [[however, I do have an 8CD compilation Sasha Frere-Jones made for that year that I fit onto one MP3 CDR. I'm loathe to count it but I should post the tracklist sometime. he also did an 18 CD 2002 set--three of them expressly of old songs, but still that's fifteen fucking CDs--that again probably doesn't count but it's still pretty incredible. and I did a 10CD thing for '02 myself whose tracklists are listed at http://web.pitas.com/spongiex/2002_mixes.html.]]
2003 I assume everyone who wants to do will do.

― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:33 (twenty-one years ago)

please somebody stop me from doing '92 or '95 or '99.

― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:35 (twenty-one years ago)

oh man, I really wanted to do one of those remaining late-60s/early-70s years; that's why I was asking Billy upthread if he would be willing to "swap" the still-open 1971 for 1969 (because that is the one I really had my eye on). I thought, implicit in that, I was staking a claim for '71. Billy never wrote back. I don't know if he's even checked this thread since then. Dammit, I really would like to do one of those years.

― Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:37 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, then you have '71. simple enough.

fuck it, I'm doing 1995. look out, kids.

― M Matos (M Matos), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:38 (twenty-one years ago)

Aw, thank you Matos. Well , I feel bad though, because apparently I didn't make my desire explicit or clear enough and then Colin expressed interest. But I really wanted to do one of those years! I mean, my whole record collecting existence has kind of been focused on that 1968-1972 glory era...

― Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:40 (twenty-one years ago)

Also, the offer still stands to Billy, if he would like to swap '69 with '71 ... but it's not a huge issue (i just don't know if he's even seen my post about it)

― Broheems (diamond), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:41 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm doing 1959! it's gonna take a me while, though, unlike some of you lovely psychotics.

― rgeary (rgeary), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:54 (twenty-one years ago)

i kind of want to call '98 but fear the wrath if i include insufficient d&b.

― rgeary (rgeary), Sunday, 7 December 2003 03:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I'd love to do '99 if I owned/knew anything

― gabbneb (gabbneb), Sunday, 7 December 2003 04:08 (twenty-one years ago)

Sorry, but after '66 i'm doing '55.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Sunday, 7 December 2003 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh no wait, nevermind. I'm not tough enough for the fifties. Next one will be 196x.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Sunday, 7 December 2003 04:33 (twenty-one years ago)

i kind of want to call '98 but fear the wrath if i include insufficient d&b

rob i think no one cared about d&b by then ;-)

― gaz (gaz), Sunday, 7 December 2003 05:09 (twenty-one years ago)

i call '98, k thnx.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 7 December 2003 06:57 (twenty-one years ago)

CDR700 GO! 1984: "Bonjour Monsieur Orwell!"

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 7 December 2003 09:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Onward to '75, I think. I think I'll forsake 1967 -- it should probably go to with a better sense of "out" than mine.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 7 December 2003 09:46 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll take '67!

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 7 December 2003 17:07 (twenty-one years ago)

1990 unclaimed! [[oh Ne-ed...]]

Wuh? No, I'm really not the person for these projects -- a happy consumer of same, yes! But my sense is that everyone else has a much better sense of the wide range needed for any particular year and the idiosyncracies that come up are v. spiff as a result.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 December 2003 17:09 (twenty-one years ago)

Next up: '64! ('66 will be done by tonight.)

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Sunday, 7 December 2003 20:08 (twenty-one years ago)

CDR 700MB Go! 1998: After The Show It's The Dot-Com Xmas Party

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Sunday, 7 December 2003 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

What, you don't want to collaborate with ddrake?

*run, ducks, hides, puts on bulletproof vest, everything, and FAST*

― donut bitch (donut), Sunday, 7 December 2003 21:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Astounding!

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Sunday, 7 December 2003 21:55 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll take '67!

That's kinda along the lines of what I was thinking...

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 7 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

Chris and I are going to do '67 as a joint effort (bring us some smoke and the pun will be intended).

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Sunday, 7 December 2003 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

AWESOME! (Though I am the last person in the world to be caught with weed, sorry!)

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Sunday, 7 December 2003 23:07 (twenty-one years ago)

CDR 700MB Go! 1998: After The Show It's The Dot-Com Xmas Party

haha! well, i snooze, i lose i suppose.

― rgeary (rgeary), Sunday, 7 December 2003 23:41 (twenty-one years ago)

The great thing about doing these is that every single time I think I've hit upon the Greatest Year In Pop Music History. This time it might actually be true. I've already got about 150 tracks so far and I haven't even checked two of my favorite references (the-breaks.com and rocklist.net) for things I'd otherwise miss.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Monday, 8 December 2003 07:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Hey Broheems, sorry I didn't see your post, I'm well into 1969, 84 tracks so far..

I may have a crack at 57, 58 and 62 if no one objects.

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:23 (twenty-one years ago)

Mike Daddino -

I didn't actually do 1975 as an MP3 disc but there's plenty of material here:

I have become obsessed with 1975

― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:26 (twenty-one years ago)

eep! sorry rob, i posted the initial "i call 1998" post while drunk and missed yr request!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:28 (twenty-one years ago)

Are ILM stormtroops exterminating those who dare to make a CDR of a year that's already been done or something?

― Tetracell White (Andy K), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:31 (twenty-one years ago)

well i have been told to "hold off" on posting my 1993 remix.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:32 (twenty-one years ago)

In fact, there are lots of year threads that aren't 700MB Go! ones - anyone who's volunteered would be as well to do a search on the year that they're covering.

― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

If they want to, obviously.

― N. (nickdastoor), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:33 (twenty-one years ago)

i am going to go ahead and call 1999, as i am crazy like that.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Monday, 8 December 2003 19:34 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, my latest tally... CORRECTIONS please direct here...

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1967 Bad Jode / in progress
1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / in progress
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems(?) / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE
1973 Chris Barrus / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE
1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / in progress
1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / in progress
1987 Jeff W / in progress
1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1990 unclaimed!
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress
1992 unclaimed!
1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 ??????
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 ??????
1997 Jess / DONE
1998 unclaimed!
1999 unclaimed!
2001 unclaimed!
2002 ????
2003 ????

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

and i forgot to add

1989 Matos / DONE

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:10 (twenty-one years ago)

matos did 97, i did 98.

i also did 2000, and just claimed 99!

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:27 (twenty-one years ago)

A reminder that I did 2002 (and may redo it someday)

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:40 (twenty-one years ago)

C700 GO! 1986: Who Made You

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 00:52 (twenty-one years ago)

1994 ??????

― Tetracell White (Andy K), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 01:21 (twenty-one years ago)

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1967 Bad Jode / in progress
1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / in progress
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems(?) / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE
1973 Chris Barrus / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE
1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / in progress
1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / DONE
1987 Jeff W / in progress
1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1989 Matos / DONE
1990 unclaimed!
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress
1992 unclaimed!
1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 Andy K / DONE
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 ??????
1997 Matos / DONE
1998 Jess / DONE
1999 Jess / In Progress
2000 Jess / DONE
2001 unclaimed!
2002 Nate / DONE
2003 ????

(I just wanted to make use of a lot of annoying text tags)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Jess did 1996!

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)

(I've also done 2003 but that's under wraps till the year-end issue of the Weekly.)

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:24 (twenty-one years ago)

Jess and his harem of music comps. Damn, he better be clean!

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:25 (twenty-one years ago)

OK! One more time and we'll break it down into the MINE THE GAP semi-decades for convenience and planning

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
(Watch out for 20s rockists, Matos!)

1963 unclaimed!
1964 unclaimed!
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1967 Bad Jode / in progress

1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / in progress
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems(?) / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE

1973 Chris Barrus / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE

1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / in progress

1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / DONE
1987 Jeff W / in progress

1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1989 Matos / DONE
1990 unclaimed!
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress
1992 unclaimed!

1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 Andy K / DONE
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 Jess / DONE
1997 Matos / DONE

1998 Jess / DONE
1999 Jess / In Progress
2000 Jess / DONE
2001 unclaimed!
2002 Nate / DONE

2003 Matos / DONE (ssssssssssssssh!)
2004 to come!
2005 to come!
2006 to come!
2007 to come!

(I'm just begging to be called gay again by Jess at this point)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:34 (twenty-one years ago)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:35 (twenty-one years ago)

(my 2003 sucks actually so you all should do one just to improve on it)

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

So, closest ones so far:

Nate finishing up 82 for MINE THE GAP: 78-82
Matos finishing up 95 for MINE THE GAP: 93-97

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:37 (twenty-one years ago)

DB and I are MINING THE GAP for 78-82.

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 02:38 (twenty-one years ago)

I tapped out of '91, I dinna have the power (or knowledge)(or Soulseek!), cap'n. I'm just going to bask in the glow of everyone else's choices.

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:15 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll do 1992.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:17 (twenty-one years ago)

fiinish 1976 first!

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:20 (twenty-one years ago)

i am your late 90s god.

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:24 (twenty-one years ago)

I was so gonna do every year myself before all this started. Oh well.

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, so no one for 90 yet. Once I get 1988 done, if 1990 is STILL unclaimed, I'll take it.. and do it in the spirit of the Raggett.

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:46 (twenty-one years ago)

That's the only way to do anything, my friend.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:52 (twenty-one years ago)

We could always draft Ewing to do 1990...

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 03:55 (twenty-one years ago)

ewing's been rather "lax" since he inherited his "wife".

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:03 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll offer to "ghost-compile" 1990 under the "Ned Raggett" moniker

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(i just found records of mine by Uncle Wiggly and Dickless from that year, and they NEED to go on that 1990 comp!)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:26 (twenty-one years ago)

Look, if you want, I'll offer up thoughts and suggestions for the year or something.

― Ned Raggett (Ned), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:27 (twenty-one years ago)

haha dickless ruled!

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:29 (twenty-one years ago)

#1 hammer - "pray"

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:30 (twenty-one years ago)

#2 dj jazzy jeff & the fresh prince - "i think i can beat mike tyson"

― fiddo centington (dubplatestyle), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 04:31 (twenty-one years ago)

1982, BLA-DOW

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 06:17 (twenty-one years ago)

db, I'm definitely working on 1971 (thanks billy for your reply); on the case as we speak...

― Broheems (diamond), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 07:11 (twenty-one years ago)

I wouldn't mind having a crack at '90, white trousered indie dance ahoy!

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 09:54 (twenty-one years ago)

will the 700MB project be ILM's greatest contribution? A kind of alternative history of pop? Any thoughts on what should be done with these once the whole series is complete? What's the big picture?

And, how would a casual music fan get his hands on some of these? Say a music fan who's lurked on ILM for some time, only posted anonymously on a couple of occasions, has little to offer by way of trade that would impress anyone here, but has had his musical tastes so fundamentally altered by the ILM-hivemind that's he's been salivating at the thought of further mind-expansion by way of these comps?

(you know, just speaking hypothetically here)

― anotherMark (mark s.), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 19:54 (twenty-one years ago)

by emailing the individual parties and asking.

― M Matos (M Matos), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 19:56 (twenty-one years ago)

If there aren't any objections, I'd like to officially volunteer to assemble and distribute the set once all is said and done, buy some out-of-the-ordinary packaging and all that, make it a proper boxed job. Design work, donations (if necessary) and encoding standards to be debated by all at a (much?) later date, pending election of course.

― Not Any of the Contributors and certainly not a controversial former Pitchfork W, Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:13 (twenty-one years ago)

At the very least, Ned and Matos will get that.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:14 (twenty-one years ago)

OK, I'm officially claiming 1962 here.

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:54 (twenty-one years ago)

In the home stretch of 1973 right now so it'll be a little while before I can get to it (JBR and I are working on 1967 next), but I definitely want 1962

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:58 (twenty-one years ago)

So, Billy, is that a yes on '90?

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 20:59 (twenty-one years ago)

Haha, this thread is what, a week old? And look what's resulted!

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 21:17 (twenty-one years ago)

Yup, I'll do '90. I'm backing out of doing anything else though.

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 21:52 (twenty-one years ago)

Even 69?

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 22:21 (twenty-one years ago)

(I can't wait for the saucy rejoinders for this one)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 22:22 (twenty-one years ago)

i'm still doing 1959 despite never appearing on the tallies! i think i'd like to try 1960 right after as well.

― rgeary (rgeary), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:03 (twenty-one years ago)

eep! sorry rob, i posted the initial "i call 1998" post while drunk and missed yr request!

s'okay fiddo.

― rgeary (rgeary), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

especially since you then cranked out the '98 in, what, three hours?

― rgeary (rgeary), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:05 (twenty-one years ago)

Even 69?

No, should have '69 done by the weekend. Maybe even get the CD done too, boom boom.

― Billy Dods (Billy Dods), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:10 (twenty-one years ago)

new tallies...

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
(Watch out for 20s rockists, Matos!)

1958-1962

1958 unclaimed!
1959 rgeary / in progress
1960 rgeary / maybe?
1961 unclaimed!
1962 Elvis T / in progress

1963-1967

1963 unclaimed!
1964 unclaimed!
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1967 Bad Jode / in progress

1968-1972

1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / in progress
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE

1973-1977

1973 Elvis T / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE

1978-1982 : MINE THE GAP / in progress!

1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / DONE

1983-1987

1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / DONE
1987 Jeff W / in progress

1988-1992

1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1989 Matos / DONE
1990 Billy Dods / unclaimed
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress but REQUESTING HELP TO FINISH UP!
1992 unclaimed!

1993-1997

1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 Andy K / DONE
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 Jess / DONE
1997 Matos / DONE

1998-2002

1998 Jess / DONE
1999 Jess / In Progress
2000 Jess / DONE
2001 unclaimed!
2002 Nate / DONE

2003-2007

2003 Matos / DONE (ssssssssssssssh!)
2004 to come!
2005 to come!
2006 to come!
2007 to come!

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:20 (twenty-one years ago)

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
(Watch out for 20s rockists, Matos!)

1958-1962:
1958 unclaimed!
1959 rgeary / in progress
1960 rgeary / maybe?
1961 unclaimed!
1962 Elvis T / in progress

1963-1967:
1963 unclaimed!
1964 unclaimed!
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1967 Bad Jode / in progress

1968-1972:
1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / in progress
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE

1973-1977:
1973 Elvis T / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE

1978-1982 : MINE THE GAP / in progress!:
1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / DONE

1983-1987:
1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / DONE
1987 Jeff W / in progress

1988-1992:
1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1989 Matos / DONE
1990 Billy Dods / unclaimed
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress but REQUESTING HELP TO FINISH UP!
1992 unclaimed!

1993-1997:
1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 Andy K / DONE
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 Jess / DONE
1997 Matos / DONE

1998-2002:
1998 Jess / DONE
1999 Jess / In Progress
2000 Jess / DONE
2001 unclaimed!
2002 Nate / DONE

2003-2007:
2003 Matos / DONE (ssssssssssssssh!)
2004 to come!
2005 to come!
2006 to come!
2007 to come!

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:25 (twenty-one years ago)

(just wanted to reformat because the "h" tags in ILXOR cause major spaces)

― donut bitch (donut), Tuesday, 9 December 2003 23:26 (twenty-one years ago)

'66 Tears, motherfuckers.

Next up, 1964: the final installment in the most badass trilogy since The Godfather.

― Sarah Pedal (call mr. lee), Wednesday, 10 December 2003 07:38 (twenty-one years ago)

[[snort]]

― M Matos (M Matos), Wednesday, 10 December 2003 10:17 (twenty-one years ago)

There's no 1964 equivalent to Sofia Coppola, is there?

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Wednesday, 10 December 2003 14:58 (twenty-one years ago)

Latest tallies...

1920-1929 Matos / in progress
(Watch out for 20s rockists, Matos!)

1958-1962:
1958 unclaimed!
1959 rgeary / in progress
1960 rgeary / maybe?
1961 unclaimed!
1962 Elvis T / in progress

1963-1967:
1963 unclaimed!
1964 Sarah Pedal / in progress
1965 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1966 Sarah Pedal / DONE
1967 Bad Jode / in progress

1968-1972:
1968 Bad Jode / DONE
1969 Billy Dods / DONE
1970 Matos / DONE
1971 Broheems / in progress
1972 Nate / DONE

1973-1977:
1973 Elvis T / in progress
1974 James Blount / in progress
1975 Michael Daddino / in progress
1976 Chris Ott / in progress
1977 Nate / DONE

1978-1982 : MINE THE GAP / in progress!:
1978 Donut Bitch / DONE
1979 Nate / DONE
1980 Matos / DONE
1981 Andy K / DONE
1982 Nate Patrin / DONE

1983-1987:
1983 Geeta / in progress
1984 Michael Daddino / DONE
1985 Jess / DONE
1986 Chris Ott / DONE
1987 Jeff W / in progress

1988-1992:
1988 Donut Bitch / in progress
1989 Matos / DONE
1990 Billy Dods / unclaimed
1991 Miloauckerman / in progress but REQUESTING HELP TO FINISH UP!
1992 unclaimed!

1993-1997:
1993 Kenan / DONE
1994 Andy K / DONE
1995 Matos / in progress
1996 Jess / DONE
1997 Matos / DONE

1998-2002:
1998 Jess / DONE
1999 Jess / In Progress
2000 Jess / DONE
2001 unclaimed!
2002 Nate / DONE

2003-2007:
2003 Matos / DONE (ssssssssssssssh!)
2004 to come!
2005 to come!
2006 to come!
2007 to come!

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 21:49 (twenty-one years ago)

So, Milo, how can we assist if you still believe you need help? Wanna volunteer someone else you choose to take over for the rest? or what?

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:01 (twenty-one years ago)

after 1995 I'll probably want 1961, but won't object if someone else claims it first.

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:23 (twenty-one years ago)

funny, because I'd been thinking of doing '61 anyway

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

please do '61!

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:26 (twenty-one years ago)

(i want to make a good bit of headway on '67 before i claim anything else, but i could do some fun things with '63.)

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:28 (twenty-one years ago)

actually, you know what? i'm claiming that shit right now.

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-one years ago)

yeah, do it!

mmmm, jazz....

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:29 (twenty-one years ago)

Um, which one did you just claim, jode, 61 or 63?

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:31 (twenty-one years ago)

'63

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Jode and Sarah ROCKIN' THE MID SIX-TEEZ!

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I just realized I have violated my "one at a time, motherfucker!" post from earlier and would like to summarily apologize to Michael Daddino for any hardship I may have caused. (dude, do 1950!)

I picked '61, DB

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:34 (twenty-one years ago)

'61 = Coltrane's ubergreat 16-minute "Chasin' the Trane" + tons of other great jazz

and Jody, '63 = Lee Morgan's "The Sidewinder," you lucky woman!

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

So, does this mean Ott is allowed to do 1992 now?

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:39 (twenty-one years ago)

and I'll offer to work with Milo on finishing up 1991 if it turns out to be a good working relationship. :)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:41 (twenty-one years ago)

I suppose it does!

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:42 (twenty-one years ago)

Oh O-o-o-o-ott, you still want 1992?

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

(note: if he doesn't include loads of rave records, he is not allowed) >;-)

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

and Jody, '63 = Lee Morgan's "The Sidewinder," you lucky woman!

you read my mind, matos!

― bad jode (Jody Beth Rosen), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:45 (twenty-one years ago)

I think Matos's original concern is still cogent though. There's a point where ravenously gobbling up years takes away the fun and energy for all involved, especially for the compiler.. It's a lot more fun to think about a new year than to finish the one you're currently on, certainly. I know that feeling. I think that's a general day job analogy.

I've chosen to do this one year at a time just for financial reasons. :) (I tend to take these far more obsessively and seriously than most, I think), though I don't mind peripherally contributing to other things on the side where help may be needed.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:47 (twenty-one years ago)

(Let's put it this way, I now have practically reconstructed my early hip hop CD collection because of this.)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

(and let's not talk about the vinyl purchases)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 11 December 2003 22:49 (twenty-one years ago)

In case folks missed it, 1973 is done.

― Elvis Telecom (Chris Barrus), Monday, 15 December 2003 23:15 (twenty-one years ago)

FOUR ON THE FLOWA I GOT NINETY TOOO. 76 was mostly a pile of shit I can't wait to have behind me, so yes, 1992 will be my Christmas present to myself. That's it for me: 76, 86, 92.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Tuesday, 16 December 2003 13:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Coupla things:

* 1988 is 90% looking to definitely be a 2xCDR700MB Go! thing ("GoGo!"?) Over a gig, certainly. There's simply too much that i couldn't ignore. Surely will have it done by the end of the year, though hopefully if I could, within the week. But goddamn holiday season and shopping and ILX guests coming into town (Hi, Ned! ;) )

* Do any of the more freeware/shareware savvy here know of a good free normalization tool you can apply to a folder of mp3s or any encoded files?

I ask because, I did a loudness/RMS normalization of the wavs of the 1978 comp before i encoded them, to try and make the mix sounds more "pro" (and i stress the quotes), and I feel it made a HUGE difference in how the mix was perceived. And if there IS such a tool out there, I think it would really give some extra magic to all these mixes you guys are doing.

I'm listening to Daddino's mix on shuffle mode right now, and i often (though not all the time) have to re-adjust the volume every song, which is slightly unsettling (never mind the actual CD itself being unsettlingly brilliant), but unfortunately doesn't allow you to easily escape the fantasy that you're listening to some official 19?? Rhino-or-whatever mega box-set of music or whatever.

Never mind me, though. I'm a bit more technically anal about sound issues like that, and I'm surely the only one who would notice the difference.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

change "doesn't allow" to "allows" above. oops

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)

No, the volume issue bugs the living fuck out of me as well. I was forced to tinker with the volume on a couple of tracks because some of them were way too soft, especially the High Rise one, obviously a poor MP3ization of a superdim bootleg. (Though in retrospect it's now way too loud...)

Some of it is gonna atrocious no matter what anybody does. GodDAMN Hüsker Dü sounds like total utter shapeless crap on CD.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 02:36 (twenty-one years ago)

Way around volume: download the OctiMax normalization/drive plugin. This thing has changed my digital life.

Bigger problem on MP3: pure analog recordings (i.e. 70s) tend to sound really crap no matter what (unless they've subsequently been remastered and reissued).

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 02:54 (twenty-one years ago)

Just downloaded it and I agree: OCTIMAX WORKS. Pity it's 50 bucks.

― Michael Daddino (epicharmus), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 03:18 (twenty-one years ago)

i'll work on '83 over christmas (right now my brain is being consumed by a certain '83-related book project)

― geeta (geeta), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 05:48 (twenty-one years ago)

Silly question from a frequent lurker and occasional poster: um, why only one person per year? If two diff. people both wanna take on the same year, the more, the merrier, eh? [And for the record, I'm about to embark on 1986.]

― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 19:41 (twenty-one years ago)

You can do whatever you want Thomas, and post the track listing and all that. We've just informally kept it to one person per year because:

* just so there doesn't arise a case where people feel like they're "competing" with each other, which i think would bring out the worst in mixes, imho, since the whole notion of "mix competition" is really silly to begin with
* We already have a system in place that allows you to "protest" exclusions from a given year, read above
* I think more interesting mixes arise from years that you might, gasp!, not necessarily have as your first choice...i.e. it forces you to do some research and discover things you never discovered before

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 20:45 (twenty-one years ago)

Neither 1978 nor 1988 were my first choices actually. With 1978, I was all "Someone give me a year" and Matos gave me '78. If you look on top, I originally wanted to do 1987, but Jeff W came in at the last minute with an almost finished mix himself (and turned out to be a GREAT impetus for this thread, for fear of parallel duplicate year mixes), so I just shifted over a year, and now I'm having a blast.

Again, there really are no "rules". This is just a little community thing, and having people "filling in" the unclaimed years as opposed to redoing another year would make the communal project more effecient, challenging, and fun, me thinks.

I just speak for myself though.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 20:47 (twenty-one years ago)

and one more thing, you'd have to PH3AR DA SHA-DOUGH UV 0TT'Z 8TEE-S1XX M1XX, D00D

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 20:50 (twenty-one years ago)

I used her, she used me, but neither one cared-- we were gettin' our share. Workin' on our night moves.

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 21:31 (twenty-one years ago)

Just wanted some feedback, and I 'preciate yours, Donut Bitch. I ended up choosing '86 because I wanted a year that wasn't obvious (for me, that would've been '84 and '88), and that would be a challenge (discussed the matter with some ILM-posting pals). Got the link to Ott's '86, but didn't look at the tracklisting; that would be like cheating, methinks.

― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Heh, you could make this the Ultimate Musico Geeko version of the game Boggle, where you send off, like, four or five people to put together a 100 song mix CD from ONE YEAR, and you only get to include the songs that were mentioned no more than once.

― donut bitch (donut), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

That's a good idea!

― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 22:44 (twenty-one years ago)

1960 seems to be kind of unclaimed. I'm not claiming it as such but I'm starting an experiment. Rob can still do it if he wants.

1960 - pick one track and pass on the baton till a CDR700 of stuff is made

― N. (nickdastoor), Wednesday, 17 December 2003 23:11 (twenty-one years ago)

that's a terrible idea! I like odd stuff but obscurantism for its own sake is so boring.

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 18 December 2003 00:09 (twenty-one years ago)

"Song being mentioned once" != "obscure". The exercise is highly dependent on the people involved of course. I think it's interesting to see the results of such an exercise, and..um.. don't immediately see what's so terrible about it.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 00:30 (twenty-one years ago)

Its the reverse psychology that would make it fun. "Ooh, I bet she's gonna put X on that list, so I will too, but then maybe she won't because she knows I know that, therefore i won't", etc.

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 00:32 (twenty-one years ago)

Good or terrible idea, it's musically obsessive to a creepy degree, no doubt..haha

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 00:33 (twenty-one years ago)

I dunno, maybe I'm thinking more in terms of older years where musical overproduction wasn't as rampant as it is now--there's no doubt ten people could have completely different lists for any year from about '91 on and they'd all be equally valid. earlier on, that's less likely, which isn't to say it's impossible. but I guess I'm enough of a (pick one) innate populist/sucker that I want to hear megahits rub up against three-people-bought-this just for variety's and/or cognitive dissonance's sake. the thing I like about the ones I've seen/heard thus far is that they take that principle to heart. I hope I don't sound too much like a cop when I say I'd like to keep that tradition (haha "tradition") going.

― M Matos (M Matos), Thursday, 18 December 2003 00:46 (twenty-one years ago)

Well, i thought the above idea was good as a game primarily, not as much for making the best compilations.

One person
one heart
one CD
many loves
:)
<3 <3 <3
6> 6> 6>

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 01:45 (twenty-one years ago)

The bottom line here is further ILM-Pitchfork prejudice as I'm the only one being targeted for upstaging!!

(Excuse to remind you to please see my recently added cover in the 1986 thread if you missed it).

― Chris Ott (Chris Ott), Thursday, 18 December 2003 03:04 (twenty-one years ago)

Actually, Ott, as more of a lurker/reader than poster, I'd forgotten you were Pitchfork. Until now, that is.

― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Thursday, 18 December 2003 14:13 (twenty-one years ago)

(me thinks Ott was nyukking us)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 15:49 (twenty-one years ago)

Possibly. But remembering the Ott v. ILM "battles" of past years, one can never be certain.

― Thomas Inskeep (submeat), Thursday, 18 December 2003 17:47 (twenty-one years ago)

Haven't heard from Milo about 1991. If he's ditching this, I'm taking it over. Milo?

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 18 December 2003 22:54 (twenty-one years ago)

It's all yours, I gave up hope a hundred posts back. I know zilch about 1991, and no time to research. If a round two comes along, I'll give something a go then.

― miloauckerman (miloauckerman), Friday, 19 December 2003 01:51 (twenty-one years ago)

All rightie then. Thanks :)

― donut bitch (donut), Friday, 19 December 2003 04:16 (twenty-one years ago)

one month passes...

I know y'all's're obsessed with the whole Rough Guide thing (which I have found myself woefully underprepared to actually contribute to sans the usual Beck/indie rap stuff) but hey, 2003. Maybe not as good as Matos', but at least it's... uh... yeah.

― nate detritus (natedetritus), Thursday, 22 January 2004 03:02 (twenty-one years ago)

I'll be starting a brand new page for the "Go!" community, which will have links to ALL the completed threads dedicated to each "Go!" CD... unfortunately, I'm working a fucking 70 hour work week now, so it will have to wait for the time being... (thank the gods for overtime pay)

― donut bitch (donut), Thursday, 22 January 2004 03:55 (twenty-one years ago)

ten months pass...

Did geeta ever do 1983?

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 27 November 2004 13:30 (twenty years ago)

Ah - there's this thread seems to have been superseded.

The official CDR Go! thread

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:20 (twenty years ago)

Sorry about the garbled English there.

― Alba (Alba), Saturday, 27 November 2004 15:21 (twenty years ago)

You must be logged in to post. Please either login here, or if you are not registered, you may register here.